►
From YouTube: W24 0mega WG: The TE Consillence project
Description
The 0mega Working Group examines the ethos of and ethics in token engineering as well as the shared vision and diversity of its communities.
We gather every two weeks on Wednesday at 8pm CET.
Steward: Sebnem
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
D
C
I
I
really
need
to
take
you
up
on
what
you're
currently
exploring.
C
C
C
G
C
H
I
hope
hey
yes,
yes,
I've
been,
in
other
token
trenches.
As
you
said,
yeah
I
have
been
keeping
an
eye
on
everything
you
have
been
working,
so
no
worries,
I'm
aware
of
some
things,
not
the
other
working
groups,
because
I
normally
don't
join
the
other
calls.
So
I
know
there's
a
huge
work
happening
in
the
other
groups
and
I'm
not
very
up
today
with
that,
but
I
think
it's
not
that
worse.
C
We
can
start
right
so
for
today
the
agenda
will
be
that
we
go
through
the
two
initiatives:
the
funding
proposals
and
basically
get
you
know
your
final
input
or
or
acknowledgement,
and
then
martin,
I
can
publish
the
proposals
and
basically,
that's
also
the
the
start
of
maybe
refactoring
the
working
group
omega.
Now
that
structures
are
in
place.
C
I
likely
those
two
initiatives
will
have
work
streams,
their
own
rhythm
and
we
can
use
the
working
group
weekly
meetings
to
share
updates
from
those
streams,
but
also
to
yeah
pick
up
the
fundamental
or
this
underlying
current
that
keeps
coming
up
that
diversity,
you
know,
means
a
lot
more
to
us
and
and
basically
how
we
can
handle
that,
but.
C
With
appropriate
care
and
insights,
okay,
so
and
and
for
today,
we
said,
let's
have
a
round
to
basically
share
again
what
what
brought
us
to
omega
red
and
what
we.
What
is
our
intention,
like
all
of
the
topics
that
we've
been
discussing
for
not
quite
a
year?
C
No,
not
even
but
this
whole
thing
started
with
token
engineering
philosophy
in
the
channel
and
then
move
to
token
during
comments
in
this
working
group,
and
here
we
focused,
or
we
figured
out
the
core
of
it-
is
figuring
out
the
token
engineering
ethos
and
how
to
make
it
emerge
without
yeah
norming
it
right.
C
And
basically
that's
that's
my
intention
so
as
I
started
that
we'll
just
give
it
over
to
to
to
the
next
participant,
maybe
just
to
add
to
it.
I'm
really
excited
with.
C
With
all
the
insights
that
are
coming
out
of
this
group
and
also
really
the
discussion
that
happened-
and
I
would
love
so
my
intention
would
be
to
create
the
space
and
and
some
as
it
as
a
liberating
structure
to
let
that
evolve
in
a
way
that
people
can,
you
know,
maybe
drop
off
into
token
trenches,
but
then
come
back
with
more
insights
and
and
maybe
more
more
stories,
and
also
maybe
more
questions
that
they
have
and
the
tough
questions
that
there
is
no
manual
or
a
git
book.
H
We
consider
that
to
be
a
mix
of
different
backgrounds,
different
transdisciplinary
practices
right.
So
my
intention
today
is
to
come
back
to
the.
Maybe
if
we
can
to
the
specifics
about
the
two
initiatives,
I
will
be
happy
to
advance
a
little
bit
about
the
rewards
and
the
logistics
to
advance
this
to
the
considering
library
and
the
ethics
group.
So
I
would
like
to
maybe
to
focus
if
we
can
a
little
bit
on
the.
H
I
I
It
will
bring
very
different
value
that
most
of
the
projects
or
like
people
like
surplus
to
think
like,
for
example,
we
talked
about
how
revolutionary
the
crypto
space
could
be,
but
we
don't
talk
about
what
would
be
the
guideline
for
that's
a
revolutionary
act
that
may
change
our
lives.
So
I
really
like
omega
working
space.
Then
I
joined
and
I
start
to
contribute
what
letty
mostly
done
to
library
initiative,
try
to
give
my
best
thoughts
and
I'm
here,
and
I'm
very
glad
that
I'm
part
of
omega.
G
I
kind
of
typed
this
out
in
the
chat,
but
basically
I
I
at
the
core
of
it
like
outside
of
the
tec,
just
in
general.
I
I
wish
to
create
a
future
in
which
people
can
just
like
feel
safe
to
explore,
who
they
are
and
have
the
freedom
and
the
ability
to
gain
self-knowledge
and
grow
as
a
person,
since
I'm
surrounded
by
people
who
don't
have
that
luxury,
and
you
know
I
wish
I
wish
more
people
could
see
the
beauty
of
the
world
here.
But
it's
hard
when
you
know
you're
doing
other
things.
G
You
have
to
do
other
things
in
order
to
survive
so
yeah,
I'm
here,
because
I
I
want
to
direct
people
towards
like
thinking
about
how
to
create
better
systems
and
omega
is,
I
think,
very
important,
like
the
work
that
omega
is
doing
is
very
important
because
it
kind
of
tel
it
shows
people
all
the
things
that
would
be
good
to
consider
when
you're
creating
systems,
because
because
it
affects
you,
know
other
people's
lives,
it's
not
just
yeah,
it's
not
just
code.
G
It
genuinely
affects
real
life
and
people's
emotions,
and
you
know
so
yeah,
and
I
also
want
to
make
that
journey
easier
for
people,
so
I'm
trying
to
find
ways
to
do
that.
C
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
A
Well,
I
haven't
been
so
much
involved
in
omega
lately
because,
like
I
have
been
also
stewarding
gravity
and
that
has
been
taking
like
a
lot
of
time
and
like
also
like
being
on
like
immersed
in
all,
what's
happening
in
the
community
like
the
commons
upgrade
and
like
yeah
all
those
things,
but
I
feel
that
omega
has
a
a
a
really
good
mission
that
that
I
share
and
and
is
to
create
better
systems,
and
I
feel
that
more
or
less
gravity
like
aims
to
that
same
mission
of
creating
better
systems
so
so
yeah.
A
I
I
would
really
like
to
to
contribute,
and
now
that
I
see
that
the
the
library
and
the
the
ethics
proposals
are
are
being
more
polished
yeah.
I
I
want
to
come
back
again
and
and
contribute
the
way
that
I
can,
because
I
feel
there.
This
is
a
really
cool
project
and
I
will
pass
to
steph
is
if
he
could
solve
his
mic
problems.
C
Staff
is
quite
new,
so
maybe
if
he
wants
to
say
a
few
words,
please
feel
free
step,
but
don't
feel
over
over
bound
or
driven
to
say
something.
But
maybe
if
you
want
to
share,
if
what
resonated
for
you
to
come
back
to
omega,
that
he
ethics
and
the
knowledge
initiatives.
C
B
J
Yeah
I
can
share
yeah,
so
you
know
kind
of
the
ethical
philosophy
has
always
kind
of
been
interesting
to
me,
and
I
think
it
dovetails
really
well
with
tea
and
token
engineering
with
token
engineering.
You
know
you
have
the
opportunity
to
have
you
know
more
ex
expressivity
in
the
the
economic
systems
that
you
design,
and
so
I
think
it's
really
important
to
get
those
ethical
things
correct.
So
yeah,
that's
my
interest,
just
kind
of
here
to
learn
and
see
what's
going
on.
Thank
you.
C
Okay,
then,
since
you're
17
minutes,
then
I
will
take
only
two
more
minutes
to
just
stay
because
also
good
ass,
etc.
Couldn't
make
it.
Maybe
we
have
another
roundup
of
this,
but
one
of
the
initiatives
that
has
been
longest
brewing
is
the
who
owns
ethics
or
the
ethics
participatory
research
initiative,
and
what
we
did
was
the
community
survey.
Then
this
dialogue
became
focus
groups
and
we
had
one
and
analyzed
that
and
from
that
focus
group
analysis,
we
extracted
what
emerged
this
these
principles
and
based
according
to
those
principles.
C
We
also
came
up
with
practical
courses
because
those
questions
well
our
dilemmas,
obviously
hard
to
get
at
and
written
from
this
group
facilitators
and
co-facilitators
raise
their
hands.
Who
could
really
provide
insightful
yeah
conciliants
of
of
many
mental
models?
So
we
have
come
up
with,
I
think,
very
fundamental
for
t
principles
and
practical
courses
at
gobez,
and
we
will
be
asking
for
funds
for
that.
And
basically
yes-
and
these
are
the
facilitators
myself,
fabio
and
alberto
are
seldom
here,
but
they
have
already
contributed.
A
lot.
C
C
So
that's
that
and
what
we
are
missing
here
or
what
is
currently
going
to
happen
is
as
soon
as
those
facilitators
and
the
group.
This
little
group
inside
come
up
and
finish
with
their
offer
of
that
you
practice
session.
C
C
C
So
if
I
guess
I
don't
want
to
take
more
time
because
actually
matt
has,
or
literally
like
this
has
been
in
the
in
the
works
very
long
time,
and
if
someone
has
a
comment
that
we
should
be
going
into
now,
we
can,
but
all
in
all,
if
anything
new
comes
up
anything
that
we
should
be
restructuring,
or
so
that
will
be
just
ongoing,
ongoing
work
and
we
will
take
them
as
as
we
go
basically.
C
G
So
it
will
be,
oh
sorry,
it
would
be
writing
and
it's
not
going
to
be
like
how
gravity
did
the
graviton
training,
where
it's
it's
like
a
session.
C
Yes,
yes,
so
these
sessions
will
be
created,
but
definitely
we
can
have
a
write-up
of
what
these
principles
mean
right
and
basically
also
what
we're
planning
that
yeah
and
we
can
offer
this-
that
writing
about
the
tea
ethics
principles,
upfront
or
while
we're
preparing
the
the
practice
session
right
and
here
basically
also
the
facilitators-
have
all
freedom
to
to
to
go
at
their
own
pace
right
and
and
offer
it
at
convenient
times
for
for
them.
I
know
that
doug
does
has
difficulties
to
make
this
hour,
for
example.
C
So
all
of
this
should
be
now
that
it's
structured,
pretty
self-organized,
yes,
but
one
thing
we
can
do
is
explain
those
the
ethics
principles
that
have
emerged.
I
think
that's
a
good
contribution
that
we
can
already
share
with
the
community
now,
while
we're
working
on
on
the
practice
session-
and
there
is
more
already
commented
here-
yeah,
but
we
can
take
this
up.
I
think
latin
after
the
holiday
season,
so
the
next
time
we
meet
any
any
other
comments
or
questions
that
I
that
we
can
address
now
else.
C
I
would
stop
sharing
and.
A
C
So
I
would
instead,
I
think
we
should
have
a
holiday
break.
B
C
You
decide
we
can.
We
can
maybe
pick
that
up
at
the
end
and
there's
a
question
like
what
are
the
people's
availabilities
etc,
but
maybe
two
weeks
a
break
to
recharge
is
a
good
idea.
I
So
in
the
first
phase
we
want
basic,
a
notion
library
that
will
be
put
creations
of
subject
matter,
experts
on
their
like
the
topic
of
choice
under
this
flower
of
crypto
economics,
which
I
showed
just
recently.
So
I
opened
the
notion
page.
You
know
you
know
it
so
for
the
structure,
I
actually
want
to
steal
some
from
prime
down
which
I've
been
working
for
some
time
or
this
notion
page.
I
I
I
So,
firstly,
as
I
said
in
the
first
place,
we
will
have
outcome
as
a
notion
library,
very
basic,
very
straightforward.
So
let's
look
at
the
comments
from
our
like
community.
So
nick
asked
how
many
subject
matter
experts?
Is
there
a
limit
sham
now?
What
do
you
think
like
is?
Should
there
a
limit-
or
you
like
to
make
it
like
10,
but
it's
flexible?
What
do
you
think
guys.
A
Hello,
maybe
what
would
be
the
downside
of
having
too
much
subject
matter?
Experts.
G
I
I
H
Yeah,
I
think
we
were
talking
in
the
very
beginning
that
there
was
gonna
be
like
one
or
two
experts
category
just
because
those
were
like
the
people
committed
beginning
to
start
this
process.
So
maybe
we
can
give
it
like
this
or
just
open
it.
Okay,
let's
just
process
to
have
five
people,
communicating.
K
A
I
Yeah,
my
internet
is
not
very
good,
so
that
was
that
is
the
first
place.
First
phase
we
are
planning
to
do
and
in
the
first
place,
what
we
need
is
that
we
need
someone
to
write
start
here,
page
someone
to
write
libraries
manifesto,
these
things
that
let
you
very
like,
secondly,
put
out
like
why
we
need
this
library
and
like
will
wilbert's
integral
theory,
etc.
I
I
I
So
we
have.
We
have
to
create
notion
structure.
I
think
it's
kind
of
a
big
job,
maybe
to
have
one
help,
will
be
very
good.
So
we
we
want
to
to
create
a
library,
marketing
strategy
how
we
like
to
like
market
this
library
and
nate,
wants
to
write
an
article
about
library
on
medium.
So
it
will
be
a
one
part
of
the
marketing
strategy,
but
it
will
be
open
to
any
kind
of
marketing
contribution.
I
If
you
like
to
work
on
it,
just
assign
yourself
police.
I
will
share
notion
again
in
omega
chat,
so
you
can
take
a
look
and
she
can
advise
me
to
add
this.
Maintenance
lead
and
roll
for
the
roles
for
the
first
phase
I
have
in
mind,
is,
or
are
those,
but
do
you
have
anything
in
your
mind,
for
example,
would
you
would
you
like
to
divide
some
roles
into
two
or
three
categories,
so
that
people
can,
for
example,
can
devoid
some
little
time
if
they
have
little
time
but
can
also
get
rewarded.
H
E
A
So
that
is
not
someone
who
is
like
paid
all
the
time
to
search
for
these
sources,
but
rather
than
people
that
feels
that
they
have
some
source
to
share.
Maybe
they
can
actually
share
it
and
receive
some
kind
of
rewards
for
sharing.
H
Yeah,
I
think,
but
it
was
like,
was
trying
to
well
in
the
agenda.
I
think
that
was
like
our
reward
system
meeting,
because
I
know
the
the
other
one
have
been
talking
a
lot
about
how
this
records
are
gonna
be
distributed
in
other
proposals,
and
ours
is
not
an
exception,
so
we
are
trying,
maybe
because
of
the
best
practices
you
have
been
developing
in
other
processes,
but
as
it
is
a
little
different,
because
each
group
right
is
gonna,
be
asking
fans
to
the
comments
upgrade
separately.
H
It
is
like
we
are
trying
to
understand
what
is
the
intrinsic
motivation
for
people
to
come
here
to
the
library,
so
I
think
they
are
like.
There
can
be
a
a
main
person.
Maybe
it's
the
administrator
who
is
rewarded
if,
if
this
person
chooses
to
to
be
in
the
in
the
process
of
creation
and
is
like
the
yeah,
the
administrator
of
the
library,
this
person
can
be
paid
by
the
hour
as
as
contributors
or
as
not
the
steelers,
but
maybe
in
a
more
in
a
more
regular
basis.
H
And
then
we
have
the
bounties
for
the
creator.
So
they
can
be
like
a
different
agreement
on
time
and
resources,
so
we
we're
gonna
have
like
different
user
personas.
I
think
that's
what
nick
was
trying
to
develop
in
a
more
understandable
way,
so
we
have
those
different
rewards
systems
within
the
library
which
is
connected
to
the
token.
To
the
token,
as
well.
C
But
then
I
have
a
quality
assurance
if
you
will
like
people
who
are
really
involved
in
caring
about
the
transdisciplinarity
etc
of
of
the
contributions
or
the
annotations
of
the
contributions
decorated,
so
that
we
have
the
setup
and
also
it's
really
I
mean
latinos
that
might
has
been
picking
up,
and
it's
really
a
good
chunk
of
effort,
concentrated
efforts
to
bring
structure
even
come
up
with
the
tasks
right.
People
are
asking.
C
When
someone
enters
the
library
they
they
get.
How
to
contribute-
and
they
know
what
to
do,
and
they
know
what
is
the
rewards
that
they
can
get
so
that
will
be
phase
two
basically
open,
but
also
based
community
behind
this
library.
That
will
always
take
take
care
of
it
of
the
intentions
that
that
was
there
in
the
beginning.
C
I
I
I
After
the
initial
seat,
we
will
go
to
phase
two
which
we
will
collect
creation
from
public,
so
we
will
have
librarians,
which
are
like,
for
example,
after
after
each
month
we
can,
in
in
one
working
group
like
discussion.
We
can
discuss
which
creation
we
would
like
to
like
give
reward
and
we
can
democratically
vote
it.
Then
we
will
give
some
reward
to
those
creations
to
incentivize
quality
contribution.
I
So
in
the
second
phase
we
would
like
to
ask
like
15
more
another
15k
for
further
development,
which
we
will
create
like
type
forms
and
like
library
structure
that
can
like
have
like
different
levels
of
accessibility,
etc,
etc,
and
we
we
want
to
use
it.
Some
of
them
is
for
development
and
but
most
of
them
for
the
bounties,
because
development
is
little
part
of
it.
So
we
want
to,
for
example,
like
that
allocate
10k
for
the
bounties
for,
like
let's
say
four
months,
five
month
period
or
six
months.
I
I
I
put
reward
as
wag
as
I
answered
letty's
comment,
because
I'd
like
to
discuss
it
with
you
guys
like
how
we
we
should
reward
it,
etc,
but
it's
not
the
most
urgent
part,
because
at
the
beginning
we
should
like
put
to
phase
one
with
a
very
good
quality
so
that
we
can
like
attract
those
very
good
seed
creators.
Subject
matter
excerpts,
then
we
will
open
phase
two
and
one
after
that
we
will
go
to
phase
three.
If
community
likes
the
library,
for
example,
we
will
go
there.
I
We
have
an
idea
about
te,
consilla's
library.
We
wanted
to
make
it
more
beautiful,
more
engaging
more
aligned
with
the
culture
of
web3.
So
we
want
to
work
with
meta
profile.
We
could
incorporate
meta
profiles
to
our
library,
so
we
will
have
like
reputation,
points
the
exp,
expertise,
badges
and
all
those
other
stuff
like
meta
profiles,
but
this
will
be
the
step
if
community
wants
it,
so
we
won't
be
like
this
will
be
the
next
definitive
step.
So
we
will
create
those
two
steps.
I
For
example,
if
community
says
oh,
this
two-step
is
more
than
enough,
like
people
are
already
contributing
it,
it's
very
good.
We
don't
want
to
spend
like
time
and
money
to
this
phase,
three
which,
which
only
will
make
it
culturally
more
reliant
and
better
looking
or
the
community
will
say.
Okay,
this
no
one
is
using
this
library.
I
think
it's
worthless
to
invest
in
phase
three,
so
phase
three
will
be
like
not
obligatory,
but
it's
an
idea
or
it's
a
vision
for
the
future
of
library,
but
the
first
two.
C
I
Since
we
have
like
very
little
time,
I
like
we
will
work
on
this
asynchronously
about
other
parts,
I
think
we
should
go
for
the
funding
parts
because
it's
hard
to
discuss
it
asynchronously,
since
we
are
now
here
so,
like
I'm
sorry,
I
were
talking
about
like
last
meeting.
We
were
too
so
how
to
allocate
this
one.
I
It
is
better.
It
is
hard
to
assign
like
value
to
task
like,
for
example,
how
do
you
define
like?
Is
it
time
or
is
it
like
the
hardness
of
the
task?
It
is
again
a
problematic
question
like,
for
example,
is:
is
it
hard
to
harder
to
write,
manifest
or
a
started,
page,
etc,
etc?
Kind
of
thing?
So
we
wanted
to
make
this
session
as
like
a
democratic
discussion
like
open
forum
kind
of
thing,
how
about
thinking
how
to
like
allocate
this
15k
so
that
we
can
write
it
proposal.
I
C
C
Exactly
so
so,
basically,
I
also
because
you
know
working
group
in
general
and
then
also
t
ethics
and
getting
up
one
of
the
sessions
etc.
C
It's
quite
filled
up
my
time,
but
I
said
I
I
care
for
the
library
definitely
and
I'm
I'm
there
and
I
would
love
to
create
and
or
get
others
like,
zargam,
sherman,
trent
and
so
on
to
to
contribute
or
curate
these
things
I
can
do
and
kojak
also
said
that
he,
you
know
economics,
finance,
token
economics
as
his
interest
and
background.
He
could
also
be
available
but
cannot
commit.
C
A
So
if
that
somehow
helps
on
the
distribution
of
work
between
phase
two
and
and
phase
one
yeah,
it's
just
a
number
that
that
can
help
you
to
design
the
the
the
workloads
but
yeah.
It's
it's!
It's
not
that
it's
a
stone,
written
law!
It's
not
that!
But
it's
something
that
we
more
or
less
have
like,
talked
and
used
for
the
proposals
in
the
other
working
groups.
A
Yeah,
it's
it's
the
rate
that
all
the
stewards
are
being
compensated
for
their
work.
So
it's
like
more
or
less
maintaining
the
the
the
payment
that
we
have
been
having
for
the
cultural
build,
but
yeah.
A
It's
not
like
a
stone
written
thing
that
if,
if
you
say
that
some
people
can
be
rewarded
more
because
the
complexity
of
their
work
requires
that
or
if
it's
just
one
time
contribution,
but
it
has
like
a
lot
of
development
time.
Yeah.
A
Like
a
bounty
for
that,
but
for
like
work
related
two
hours
or
like
daily
work,
it's
like
more
or
less
that
rate,
but
it's
also
a
rate
that
can
be
compensated
by
bounties,
like
you
have
this
basic
rate.
But
then
you
work
on
two
things,
and
then
you
have
two
bounties
and
yeah
that
that
makes
better
your
your
your
your
salary.
C
So
that
was-
and
that's
I
I
guess
my
opinion,
but
then
I
will
be
quiet,
because
I
also
want
to
hear
others,
but
one
can
easily
also
say
hey.
This
is
going
to
a
library,
it's
going
to
be
quite
helpful
for
a
lot
of
people
right
who
are
coming
in.
C
Actually
I
mean
I
can
show
you
messages
right
and
left
why
people
get
lost
and
and
where
they're
lost,
etc,
and
because
it's
transdisciplinary
and
people
really
first
one
or
two
years
go
into
actually
understanding
the
overlaps
of
complex
topics
in
which
we
in
which
we
are
so
my
thinking
and
that's
what
I
also
said.
Look,
I
don't
want
to
discuss
hourly
rates
because
we're
going
to
end
up
very
low
and
that's
not
the
issue
right.
We
basically
say:
okay,
what
is
the?
C
What
is
this?
What
is
the
value?
What
is
the
long
time,
long
term
value?
If
you
get
this
started?
Is
it
going
to
be
useful
for
how
many
people
is
it
going
to
be
useful,
etc
and
then
also
knowing
that
you
know
five
people
to
to
have
them
actually
working
on
it
and
really
take
their
time
more
or
less,
no
matter
how
long
it
takes
right
so
that
that
was
the
thinking
of
it
and
also
about
the
desire
that
we
can
reasonably
ask.
C
That
was
the
thinking
and
I
would
really
recommend
not
to
try
to
break
it
down
into
hours
and
then
time,
because
that's
basically
the
system
we
want
to
get
out
out
of
either
you
have
to
sell
your
hours.
C
That's
not
how
how
you
know
wealth
or
prosperity
is
created,
but
we
invest
right.
We
invest,
we
get
see
the
mass
the
15k
I
see
as
a
seat.
Invest.
C
C
So
that's
why
I
would
say
you
know
you
can
put
the
price
tag
on
to
maybe
tasks
right
like
bounties,
but
don't
break
it
down
to
two
hours.
C
It's
it's
yeah!
It's
my
view:
you
see
it
as
an
investment
you're,
not
knowledge
workers,
you're
intellectual
investors,
and
we
need
we
need
you
and
we
need.
You
know
we
need
you
not
to
care
about.
You
know
how
to
pay
the
bills
etc,
but
we
don't
need
you
to
give
us
reasons
how
many
hours
you
had
to
work
on
it
and
why
an
hour
cost
19,
18,
20,
25
or
200
euros.
F
Yeah,
I
would
really
join
that
point
of
view,
also
taking
in
account
that
not
all
persons
live
in
the
same
cost
of
living,
so
getting
in
price
per
hour
can
cause
like
some
problems.
If
certain
persons
are
living
in
very
expensive
areas,
while
others
are
not
and.
H
Yeah,
it's
samina
was
talked
about,
rewards
like
topic.
Maybe
breakdown
specific,
I
guess
the
right
balance
between
what
seminal
is
saying
like
we
are
here
to
advance
the
token
engineering
and
this
knowledge
important
tax
plan.
We
all
know
that
even
a
very
good
job,
there's
a
balance
between
the
other
working
groups
and
the
wealth
wars,
the
contributors
and
all
these
process
that
been
also
quantified,
so
we're
here
also
to
try
to
come
up
with
new
models
or
new
modes
of
of
quantifying
this
kind
of
things,
which
is
really
difficult.
H
So
I
could
say
like
this:
maybe
a
good
amount
like
let's
say
in
k
and
it's
it
could
be
more
complicated
if
we
come
down
to
an
hour
breakdown,
because
that's
gonna
be
more
difficult
for
people
to
to
value
that,
let's
say
my
last
rate
when
I
was
billing
directly
companies
and
clients
were
was
almost
a
hundred
dollars
per
hour.
H
So
I
will
not
come
here
and
ask
my
value
to
be
here
contributing
because
I
know
there
are
like
other
spaces
in
other
places
that
that
are
going
to
value
this
kind
of
library,
which
is
like
right,
but
I
also
know
that
I
have
been
contributing
here
and
that
has
a
value
and
something
that
we
have
to
put
in
an
amount.
Let's,
let's
say
it's
something
like
that
or
say:
okay,
we
are
not
gonna
put
a
specific
time
hours
for
people,
but
maybe
we
are
a
whole
team.
H
We
are
asking
for
this
kind
of
amount,
let's
come
up
later
with
say
based
the
amount
for
for
the
bounties,
which
is
gonna,
be
different,
but
we
need,
like
a
team.
H
C
So,
and
and
15k
from
from
your
side,
is
it
the?
Is
it
reasonable?
I
could
put
a
little
bit
more
because
this
is
something
like
that.
H
C
And
also
thinking
about
it,
because
I
started
with
investment
etc.
Right,
there
were
also,
quite
I
mean
everyone
that
comes
in
says
hey.
Actually,
there
is
a
whole
ecosystem
around
these.
These
knowledge
products
and
such
a
libraries
is
one
of
that
right,
so
I
believe
in
phase
two
or
even
once
we
have
through
and
we
see
what
it
is
that
we're
offering.
C
C
I
sense
that
we
will
be
a
tokenizing
those
flows
and
be
also
connecting
to
early
contributors,
as
well
as
the
token
engineering
commons
back
so
trying
trying
to
keep
that
in
mind,
but
also
at
the
same
time.
C
I
think
these
first
proposals
are
really
to
get
to
a
place
where
we
can
show
yeah,
first
prototypes,
really
rudimentary
right,
but
with
a
group
that
is
really
motivated
to
to
see
this
through
also
through
phase
two
and
phase
three
and
grow
that
okay
and
would
you
would
you
like
to
say,
okay,
we're
five
people
are
killing.
Can
I
see,
can
you
scroll
down
to
the
team
people's
and
raise
their
hands?
Who
will
be
there
so
basically
march
nick
mano,
douglas
letty?
C
And
one
do
you
would
you
like
to
you
know?
You
know
certain
tasks
that
need
to
are
already
there
and
there
needs
to
be
basically
someone
who
keeps
track
of
the
whole
coordination
effort,
etc.
That's
been
married
mostly
recently.
C
One
option
is
to
say:
okay,
we're
that's
the
four
of
us
and
we
just
basically
divide
and
conquer
every
week
and
see
and
then
distribute
accordingly
or
an
easier
version
would
be
that
people
sit
down
and
say:
okay,
let's
say
this
is
the
first
run-off.
This
is
the
first
listing
of
tasks
we
came
up
with
and
likely
there
will
be
a
second
and
third
iteration.
Once
those
tasks
have
been
done,
we
will
find
more
fine,
granular
tags
that
need
to
be
done
and
basically
cut.
C
The
budget
in
three
chunks
distribute
the
first
one
over
the
first
tasks
then
come
up
with
the
polishing
and
distribute
the
second
chart
chunk
over
the
next
iteration
of
tasks,
so
that
type
of
iterative,
fine
tuning
of
how
to
take
care
of
the
task,
progress
and
funds
distribution
could
be
done
or
you
could
say,
hey.
Obviously,
it's
been
mostly
us
the
last
year
and
we're
going
to
be
here
the
next
three
months
to
see
this
true,
let's
distribute
according
to
our
needs
and
availabilities
that
could
that's
the
other
option.
G
I'd
like
to
say
well,
ask
I
guess
like
steph
since
you're
here,
are
you
interested
in
joining
or
contributing
to
the
omega
working
group.
F
Yeah
at
this
point
I'm
quite
interested,
but
I
don't
want
to
barge
into
a
project-
that's
already
in
quite
a
far
state,
so
I
think
I'll
stay
a
bit
on
the
sideline
and
help
where
I
can.
I
have
a
few
ideas,
but
I
don't
know
if
they're
relevant
to
the
process
now,
but.
F
F
So
maybe
that's
a
nice
way
of
like
pee
reviewing
each
other
and
as
a
contributor
that
I
can
kind
of
say.
I
think
I
would
get
this
much
for
it
and
then
from
the
peer
review.
It
can
be
kind
of
a
kind
of
compromise
or
something
that
kind
of
confirms.
Okay.
This
is
kind
of
what
we
think
is
worth
your
contribution.
C
Exactly
that,
that's
ideas
for
phase
two
definitely.
C
So
maybe
we
also
add
steph
on
on
on
call
and
yeah
anytime.
We
go
into
that.
M
F
After
so
I
can
be
there,
but
I'm
gonna
be
on
night
shifts
or
in
a
very
irregular
yeah.
C
Okay,
maybe
voluntary
parties,
but
not
not
on
call
but
interested.
Definitely,
okay,
yes!
So
for
the
proposal,
we
don't
have
to
explain
how
we
break
it
down,
but
does
anyone
of
you
who
signed
up
have
concerns
like
we
should
clarify
something
before
we
ask
for
funding?
Does
anyone
of
you
say
I
need
more
discussion?
C
I
have
an
objection
that
we
should
be
getting
clarified
before
we
move
on
with
requesting
the
15k
and
and
continuing
with
finding
the
best
way
to
how
to
distribute
that
among
the
participants
among
the
contributors
and
and
really
the
phase
one
contributors.
C
It's
basically
us
right
and
I
guess
we
need
to
have
this
basic
standing
and
then
already
started
so
that
we
can
reach
out
to,
for
example,
zarga
and
say
you
now
give
us
the
tour
around
the
whole
of
this
crypto
economics,
flower
or
sherman,
for
example,
right,
and
it
would
be
great
because
they're
also
quite
time
restricted,
but
would
love
to
contribute,
I'm
sure
if
they
know
quickly
how
to
right
to
get
it
into
a
stage,
definitely
yeah
of
those
people
who
commit
to
get
it
into
such
a
stage.
G
I
have
some
questions,
so
I
will
also
be
starting
a
full-time
job
in
january,
but
I
have
chosen
a
bunch
of
tasks
that
I
believe
I
can
do
once.
I
finish
my
working
day,
but
it
does
mean
that
I
might
not
be
able
to
attend
the
course,
but
I
do
plan
on
catching
up
to
them
like
on
the
youtube
and
stuff.
Does
that
just
like.
C
That,
no,
I
think,
that's
the
type
of
organizations
we
go
for
right,
asynchronous,
but
totally
synced
up
in
a
way,
and
one
ask
I
would
have
really
you
know,
raise
your
hand
if
something
isn't
working
the
way
you
you
thought,
don't
burn
yourself
out,
that's
something!
C
Actually
I
don't
know
if
fred
went
to
stuart
meeting
but
tamara
shared
with
me,
and
I
found
it
really
soothing,
and
I
also
shared
that
the
new
new
contributor,
the
writing
of
a
new
contributor
in
token
engineering,
commons
and
hopefully
in
that's
becoming
the
culture
we're
here
for
is
basically
you
know,
figuring
out.
C
The
tasks
to
be
done
is
is
a
task
in
and
on
itself,
contributing
there
and
then
raising
your
hand
and
saying
I
want
to
do
this
committing
to
it,
but
then
also
coming
back
and
say
I
cannot
do
this
anymore,
that's
totally
fine
and
then
basically,
the
the
task
and
the
bounty
whatever
is
left
of
it
goes
back
into
into
in
progress
or
or
and
picking
up.
We
we
will
figure
that
part
out
for
sure,
so
no
guilds
all
play
and
yeah.
G
Well,
I
mean,
for
example,
like
when
jargodus
and
I
were
discussing
the
user
persona
ideas.
You
know
like
that
required
a
cold
and
I
feel
like
when
you're
working
on
something
with
someone.
It
tends
to
end
up
being
a
coal,
but
that's
something
I
personally
struggle
with,
but
I
don't
want
to
make
it
difficult
for
other
people
to
work
with
me
if,
if
they
join
me
on
a
task
so
should
I
maybe
remove
myself.
C
C
C
I
wouldn't
have
a
problem
with
tech.
You
know
asynchronous
chats,
that's
also
my
style.
So
that's
why
I
hope
it
isn't
the
problem,
but
if
it
would
become
a
problem,
I
guess
we
would
really
get
together
and
talk
right
in
a
sense.
Why
is
it
a
problem
right?
Why
isn't
it
working,
but
it
shouldn't
be.
C
From
the
task
that
you
have
picked,
I
don't
see
it's
a
problem
right,
yes,
so
and
with
the
structure
yeah
with
the
structure,
if
it
doesn't
work
asynchronously,
if
you,
I
don't
think
it
mike
knows,
I've
been
very
asynchronous,
so
we
can
say
it's
kind
of
working
and
at
some
point
we
had
a
call,
but
that
was
okay
as
well.
So
let's
see
how
it
unfolds.
C
So
this
isn't
a
paid
paid
one.
Did
you
ask
tam?
C
So
if
you
want
to
go
full
force
or
something
it
would
be
bad
to
discover
a
dead
end
or
so
because
it's
not
a
paid
option,
but
I'd
also
pay
up.
It
wouldn't
be
a
problem,
but
you
can
also
ask
tam
or
the
stewards
working
group
whether
there
there
is
resources,
a
pooled
resource,
a
pooled
notion,
engineering,
commons
notion,
team
or
so
right.
I
I
I
So
we
just
need
two
things
now
so
since
we
just
want
breakdown
of
this
15k.
So
as
far
as
I
understand,
but
please
make
me
correct:
if
I'm
wrong,
we
will
just
break
down
it
after
we
have
delivered
the
work
right.
We
will.
We
will
ask
tc,
like
once
we
have
done
work.
We
will
say:
okay,
like
I've,
done
this
this
this
okay,
this
much
so,
let's
break
it
down
kind
of
work.
N
C
C
Okay,
that's
the
goal
of
the
forum
post
and
advice
process.
During
that
time
we
can
work
out
the
the
breakdown
of
this
budget.
I
would,
I
would
suggest
some
iterative
yeah
if
you,
for
example,
making
three
iterations
and
saying
who
will
be
basically
asking
or
getting
the
funds
for
what
type
of
works
and
then
direct
to
the
task,
page,
etc.
C
I
H
C
It
makes
sense
to
go
through
the
advanced
process,
even
if
it's
just
for
a
week
and
get
some
comments
and
feedback
just
not
to
and
then
also
to
refer
to
that
advice,
post.
Definitely,
okay,
because.
H
H
A
Be
before
or
after
the
grid,
the
the
process
is
first
to
post
the
proposal
in
the
forum
and
the
proposal
will
only
be
able
to
pass
after
the
commons
upgrade,
but
the
dates
of
the
commons
upgrade
is
more
or
less
the
first
weeks
of
january.
A
So
this
would
be
like
it
would
be
really
good
if
the
proposal
can
be
in
the
forum,
maybe
in
the
last
days
of
the
first
or
the
first
days
of
next,
like
maybe
in
the
last
days
of
of
this
year
or
in
the
first
days
of
next
year,
so
that
it
can
have
like
10
or
12
14
days
in
the
in
the
forum
to
have
advice
process
before
it.
It
actually
goes
as
a
proposal
for
for
the
for
the
conviction.
Voting.
C
A
So
you
can
see
more
or
less
how
we
are
like
designing
that
that
proposal
and
and
yeah
the
idea
is
that
we
can
be
able
to
to
propose
this
for
next
year
and
to
start
with
this
proposal
with
the
commons
upgrade.
A
Yeah
yeah
conviction
voting,
makes
proposals
to
compete
for
conviction
but
like,
and
that
will
be
really
the
like
defined
by
the
the
parameters
that
we
choose
in
the
commons
upgrade.
But.
A
H
For
funding
the
whole
working
groups
right,
it
would
be
competing
for
funds
between
the
working
group
so
there's
a
maximum
allocate.
I
can
log
in
for
for
the.
A
That's
the
maximum
allocation
that
can
have
a
proposal,
but
the
the
the
breakdown
it's
up
to
the
working
groups
and
also
the
thing
is
that
through
conviction,
voting
one
of
the
things
that
we
are
trying
to
do
is
that,
if,
if
we
require
too
much
conviction
to
pass
a
proposal,
then
proposals
may
compete
between
themselves
to
choose
like
who
passes
and
who
doesn't
pass
us.
A
A
Okay,
we
got
found
funding
for
three
working
groups
and
there
are
six
working
groups
that
aren't
being
able
to
have
funding
because
of
of
the
of
the
conviction,
voting
parameters,
and
rather
like
that,
we
are
being
able
to
pass
like
a
bunch
of
of
of
proposals
in
a
week
or
two.
We.
C
C
So,
that's,
why
don't
don't
you
know,
let's
see
what's
happening
and.
C
C
Yes,
yes,
so
don't
see
it
that
way,
please!
This
is
literally
the
alpha
test.
Okay,
if,
if
you
think
like
okay,
is
this
going
to
be
how
life
is
in
token
entering
comments?
Let's
no
okay,
we
that
that's
the
first
time
and
let's
see
how
that
all
of
that
feels.
Okay
mark
make
your
comments
and
everything
and
let's
put
that
into
improvements
moving
on,
but
definitely
we
need
to
find
ways
to
get
to.
C
You
know:
abundance
mindset,
collaborative
mindsets
and
tools
and
and
processes
and
parameters
that
allow
for
that
to
happen
what
we
actually
are
living.
So
that's
my
two
cents.
We
are
20
minutes
over.
So
is
that
again
don't
take
this
literally?
It's
not
your
hourly
work.
It's
not
it's!
It's
it's
our
test
with
a
little
budget,
okay,
mostly
for
testing
the
whole
process
and
not
at
all
to
actually
put
a
value
on
your
priceless
contributions
and
what
you
share
and
what
you
hopefully
will
be
sharing
to
to
make
this
a
great
ride.
Okay,.
A
Only
to
say
I'm
sorry
because
my
internet
jumped
when
I
was
while
I
was
speaking,
but
it's
just
that
yeah-
that
there
are
going
to
be
like
a
lot
of
proposals
in
conviction,
voting
and
yeah,
that
that
our
strategy
is
to
be
able
to
pass
them
and
and
not
to
be
like
conflicting
between
proposals
within
the
parameters.
A
But
that's
what
it's
so
important
to
choose
like
good
parameters,
because
the
parameters
that
we
choose
are
going
to
be
the
ones
that
that
set.
How
many
proposals
we
will
be?
Will
we
be
able
to
pass
at
a
certain
time
and
if
proposals
will
compete
between
them
but
yeah?
I
don't
want
to
take
more
time
and
yeah
thanks
everyone.
This
is
super
interesting.
C
Thank
you
fan
for
providing
the
informations
that
we
needed
and
thanks
everyone
so
mike.
Let's
get
these
proposals
online
into
the
forum
post
and
ask
everyone
to
to
engage
with
it
with
those,
and
you
definitely
have
two
weeks
time
then
so,
if
you
can
get,
those
up
would
be
great.