►
From YouTube: W52 0mega WG: Initiatives Updates
Description
The 0mega Working Group examines the ethos of and ethics in token engineering as well as the shared vision and diversity of its communities.
We gather every week on Wednesday at 8pm CET.
Steward: Sebnem
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
The
game
theory
user-
for
maybe
applying
this
to
the
allocations
of
future
resources,
maybe
on
the
board
that
we're
redistributing
not
like,
maybe
the
main
mechanism,
or
we
can
just
add,
updates
or
having
this
kind
of
just
thinking
about
the
game
theory,
but
also
having
the
other
mechanisms.
We
were
thinking
about,
maintaining
things
and
having
the
energy
creates
a
business.
So
it's
super
interesting.
Having
this
at
hand.
B
B
This
is
so
lydia
right
now
we
have
quite
some
interesting
sorting
to
do,
or
you
know
it.
It's
getting
interesting
goes
with
the
coincidence,
library
and
this
research
that
we
have
going
on
with
okay.
How
can
we
embed
or
host
multiple
different
work?
Styles
working
styles-
I
mean
ours
anyway,
that's
everything
very
asynchronous,
and
then
how
can
we
also
experiment
with
distributional
funds?
You
know
we
have.
I
think
we
have
15k
from
for
this
prototyping,
the
concealers
library,
and
then
we
we
wanted
to
play
with
the
distribution
of
it.
B
So
that
will
be
a
topic,
and
maybe
we
can
you
know
first,
I
know
it's
an
important
topic
for
for
the
people
contributing,
but
at
the
same
time,
lydia
is
also
trying
to
sync
up
with
this
omega.
With
respect
to
token
engineering
ethics,
the
focus
groups-
and
you
know
she
wanted
to
already
start
in
july.
B
We
knew
it's
going
to
be
hard
with
all
the
community
events
going
on
in
europe,
so,
but
still
now
that
we
have
our
here,
if,
if
all
of
you
are
okay,
maybe
we
reserve
the
first
half
hour
to
synchronize.
B
B
Do
you
need
feedback?
You
know
I
I
raised
my
hand
to
to
provide
anything
that
in
anything.
In
addition,
if
if
there
is
needed,
but
would
be
great
if
we,
if
you
use
the
first
half
hour
to
sing.
C
D
C
Like
some
of
the
questions,
but
it
was
a
bit
like
some
questions-
were
a
bit
difficult
or
like
we.
We
wanted
to
discuss
this
in
a
bigger
round.
C
C
Yes,
so
this
was
the
idea
of
felix
and
me:
can
you
share
again.
B
E
In
the
other
focus
group,
one
in
august.
B
Do
you
already,
for
example,
are
you
well
connected
and
do
you
know
how
to
gather
focus
group
of
token
engineers?
Can
we
support
you
in
that,
like
we
should
definitely
get
t
comments,
other
working
groups
or
stewards
to
sup
help
with
that
I
mean
lydia.
D
E
Is
actually
one
of
the
two
things
we
wanted
to
ask
you
for?
Is
your
support
in
in
getting
enough
and
good
and
interested
participants
to
the
folks
right.
B
A
Group,
yes,
it's
now
updated
the
channel,
so
you
can.
I
will
share
the
document
in
the
omega
main
one,
so
we're
gonna
say.
B
So
if
we
directly
ask
and
we
motivate
well,
then
the
first
focus
group
we
had
actually
everyone
showed
up
and
I
think
we
were
six
or
seven
practicing
token
engineers.
E
That
would,
I
think
we
said
that
we
would
need
at
least
five
to
seven
upper
end
would
be
like
15.
yeah
around
15..
So
I
think
if
we,
if
we're
already
on
the
lower
end,.
E
Let's
say,
screening
for
diversity
would
and
even
more
reduce
the
yeah.
So
I
think,
as
long
as
we
don't
have
more
than
15,
we
would
just
take
everyone
in
the
group
like
into
the
finished
group.
B
B
And
and
one
thing
I
will
look
or
let
us
let
us
get
the
documents
just
one
question:
for
example,
one
thing
that
is
always
coming
up
is
like
who
is
a
token
engineer
and
and
the
typical
idea
that
we
have
is
like
people
with
the
engineering
heavy
background
right,
but
more
and
more,
we
realize
see,
accept
and
also
want
to
foster.
Actually,
you
know
the
humanities
side
of
this
crypto
economics.
Flower
is
super
important
and
needed
within
daos.
B
You
know
not
just
doing
token
engineering
and
then
also
that,
like
how
much
token
network
participants
need
ma
should
be
knowledgeable
about
the
token
economics,
because
basically
they're
voting,
you
know
and
then
sometimes
they
need
to
actually
participate
in
more
complex
mechanics
mechanisms
and
so
on.
So
what
do
you
think
about
that?.
C
I
think
it
depends
on
the
focus
group
discussion,
so
I
think
what?
If,
for
the
first
one
it's
much
more
open,
but
I
think
it
would
be
in
like
I
would
say
it
would
be
interesting
to
have
kind
of
diversity
with
regard
to
new
members
old
members
in
the
background,
and
also,
of
course,
geographical
diversity.
C
Yes,
but
I'm
just
thinking
because
for
for
my
for
my
focus
group
discussion
like
because
if
we
speak
about
value
system,
it's
a
very
pro
topic.
We
can.
I
think
that
the
problem
would
be.
If
we
start,
we
would
need
more
focus
groups
just
to
define
maybe
what
are
important
values.
C
So
my
idea
would
be
maybe
to
start
with
one
or
two
values
with
like
in
the
first
focus
group
discussion
and
to
really
go
in
too
deep,
like
I
don't
know
like
two
three
important
values
but
yeah
we
were
discussing
this
also,
the
last
time
we
were
a
bit
unsure
like
what
could
be
two
three
core
values
and
yeah.
So
this
is
my
question
to
like
to
you
to
all
of
you.
B
A
Yeah,
that's
like
going
back
to
the
original
question
we
were
discussing
like
what
is
the
social
methodology.
We
are
really
following
to
have
any
kind
of
study
being
done
within
the
tech,
because
we
have
and
stated
missing
invisible
values,
but
that
was
really
established
by
the
original
people
that
were
like
the
steelers
or
the
original
people
working
within
the
tech.
A
But
if
we
are
studying
now,
what
are
these
systems
or
are
we
studying
really
like
if
these
values
are
being
implemented
with
a
qualitative
criteria,
or
are
we
really
signing
or
asking
for
the
sample,
then
this
new
samples,
you
say:
okay,
do
you
feel
connected
with
the
values
we
say
at
the
beginning?
So
I
see
like
those
two
very
different
things.
A
Right,
one
is
like
qualitative
and
quantitatively
asking
if
the
museum
fixing
values
are
being
established
and
followed,
and
the
other
is
like
redesigning
for
the
optimization
of
the
system
in
a
way
right
like
saying
what
is
not,
according
with
your
values
in
the
system
and
yes,
people
are
super
different
in
in
the
different
circles.
Let's
see
of
this
ecosystem.
B
And
so
one
very
big
thing
that
we
state
is
ethic
yeah,
ethical
approach
and
so
on,
and
I
think
even
if
you
would
just
get
at
that,
you
know
eg
ethics
and
then
the
questions
that
you're
formulating
that
will
be.
The
focus
group
will
revolve
around
these
questions
right.
How
are
these
values
actually
put
into
practice?
I
think
that
cover
is
let
the
what
you're
saying
like
from
the
focus
group.
B
As
through
these
discussions,
we
will
see
like
how
is
it
in
practice
right.
C
Or
lydia,
but
I'm
super
I'm
super
concerned.
This
will
be
too
proud
because
we
don't
have.
We
will
not
do
like
focus
group
sessions
around
the
radio
system
and
we
will
not
have
five
six
sessions.
We
will
have
maybe
one
and
if
we
see
like
to
be
also
pragmatic
and
realistic.
Now,
like
let's
say
we
start
with
one,
we
see
okay,
there's
huge
potential.
We
can
maybe
do
another
one,
but
if,
like
I
think
for
me,
this
topic
of
ethics,
it's
a
bit
too
too,
too
proud
or.
D
A
Because
you
cannot
downside
ethics
to
one
stupid
person,
because
all
of
them
are
interrelated
really,
so
you
are
just
just
entering
the
system
to
get
your
your
your
answers.
D
C
B
B
C
Yeah
I
mean
how
I
mean
I
see
like
I
see
that
the
problem
we
pick
one
or
two
values,
and
I
see
also
like
what
you
are
saying
know
that
this
like
we
will
disregard
or
downguard
certain
issues,
but
I'm
just
like
from
my
experience.
It
would
be
better
to
have
a
more
specific
specific
topic
because
for
me
I
will
also
prepare
some
like
questions
for
the
focus
group,
discussion
and.
B
No,
no,
I'm,
okay!
So
so
what?
If
you
you
know,
you
don't
have
to
give
an
example
from
this,
but
what
would
be
a
a
more
focused
question
or
how?
What
would
you
suggest
like
I
mean
here,
you
know,
values,
human-centered
advancement,
you
know
anything
over
short-term
profits
and
seriously
literally,
not
even
pre-hatches.
Already,
oh,
we
have
to
make
profits.
B
Otherwise
the
token
is
going
to
tank.
I
mean
these
are
so
obvious
dissonant.
Why?
Why
aren't
we
going
into
this?
You
know.
B
Do
you
know
what
I
mean?
I
mean
it's,
it's
interesting,
it's
not
funny,
maybe,
but
it
is
interesting
as
it's
so
in
our
faces.
Yet
you
know
I
mean
I
would
love
to
focus
on
that.
B
I
don't
know
what
you
think
like
when
you
okay
question.
C
Science,
like
the
probe
like
what
you
written
and
I
I
thought
I
like
I-
I
also
put
down
tweaks
like
two
examples
like
like
just
what
I
was
reading
from
the
documents
like
you
created
before,
I
think
once,
for
example,
self
serenity
and
the
other
one
called
creation,
like
as
an
example
of
yeah,
one
conclusion,
but
I'm
also
not
sure.
But
now
you
mentioned
no.
D
F
B
B
B
Radically
open
source
non-hierarchical
and
I
think,
that's
cool.
You
know
there
are
things
that
you
say.
Oh
yeah
like
this
is
happening
transparent
in
their
intentions,
accountable
for
their
actions
and
so
on,
and
then
also
things
that
are,
you
know
as
soon
as
yes
look
at
the
economics
and
then
okay,
we
didn't
find
a
surefire
way
of
figuring
out
public
goods
funding
like
no
one
has,
but
we
will
continue
emphasizing
that
over
short-term
profits
and
at
the
same
time
we
have
this.
B
E
D
About
that
yeah,
so
yeah
we
write
all
this
stuff,
but
the
fact
is
is
that
in
working
groups
we'll
often
just
go
well,
it
just
needs
to
get
done
so
we'll
choose
some
short
term,
something
that
seems
best
for
us
at
that
moment,
not
in
the
omega
group
not
having
a
discussion
about
ethics,
nothing,
we
just
choose
the
pragmatic
almost
every
time.
In
my
estimation
and
then
just
move
forward
and
then
later
only
later
on.
Do
we
go?
Oh
geez,
you
know,
because
we
could
do
that
thing.
We.
D
We
also
thought
that
we
should
do
that
thing
right
and
so
so,
when
we,
when
we
unintentionally
or
unconsciously,
smush
the
could
and
the
should
together.
That
seems
to
me
to
be
an
ethical
problem
right
and
so,
but
I
also
don't
see
a
lot
of
other
stewards
coming
in
and
having
deep
ethical
discussions.
You
know
because
they're
so
busy
doing
things
right
that
they
they
don't
necessarily
you
know,
spend
the
time
on
it.
D
So
it's
great
to
say
all
this
stuff,
but
if
we
don't
have
practical
tools
that
are
enforced
by
the
people
who
are
running
working
groups
according
to
those
things
and
they're,
just
practically
useless.
B
And
I
mean
that's
a
that's
the
life
of
a
token
engineer
too,
like
or
any
tech
person.
To
be
honest,.
A
Well,
I
guess
that's
the
cooperatives
around
really
in
every
and
any
organization
we
are
working
with
and
talking,
engineering
thomas
is
yes
of
reflection
of
of
the
general
problems
we
are
having
now
with
standing
up
for
ethics
and
standing
up
for
this.
If
you
want
to
say
responsibility
in
a
sense,
so
it's
like.
Yes,
we
learn
as
we
go
along
and
we
learn
that
systems
are
very
hard
to
change
for
the
core
and
it's
like.
A
B
B
Be
optimally
all
discussions
that
might
start
now
should
come
in
the
focus
group
discussion.
So
that's.
D
B
I'm
going
to
you
know,
cut
it
a
bit
short
we're
not
or
yes
come
to
the
focus
group.
I
I
just
want
to
understand
or
help
that
we
all
get
a
clear
picture.
What
lydia
and
and
felix
need
to
be
able
to
do
do
this
or
our
company
and
as
focus
groups
and
one
thing
I'm
seeing
now,
is
so
the
first
one
value
systems
of
tech
community
and
if
you
look
here,
for
example,.
B
B
And
that
seems
to
be
reflected
in
this
one
issue
that
we
have
when
we
say
here.
We
prioritize
advancements
of
token
engineering
over
short-term
profit,
but
now,
all
of
a
sudden
you
know
we
say,
oh
god,
we
need
to
find
ways
to
make
revenues.
Otherwise
the
token
is
going
to
tank
and
and
also
that,
immediately
creates
the
question.
Oh
wait.
A
second,
wasn't
this
token
supposed
to
incentivize,
open
source
creation
and
sharing
of
token
entries
tools,
resources,
learning
materials?
B
B
How
are
we
going
to
balance
private
profit
versus
common
benefit?
Where
do
these
revenues
come
from,
and
why
should
you
know
whatever
mechanisms
we
come
up
with
those
participants
share
their
revenue
for
common
benefits
and
share
their
ip
in
open
source
for
common
benefits
versus
having
private
profit.
E
Right,
I
so
I
thought
that
in
this
sense,
but
also
in
the
sense
of
opens
becoming
unlocked
soon
and
and
really
the
question
for
individuals,
do
they
sell
their
tokens
or
part
of
the
tokens
as
long
as
the
price
is
still
up
or
do
they
keep
on
holding
them
now.
A
F
D
Short-Term
thinking
than
I
am
about
people
thinking
about
short-term
profits
and-
and
you
know
if
short-term
thinking
leads
to
short-term
profit,
taking
right.
So
so
that's
I
guess
where
I
was
coming
from
plus
not
all
profit
is
short
term
in
its
thinking
right.
So
because
we're
thinking
about
that
and
like
have
a
sample
group
and
things
now
doesn't
mean
that
that
necessarily
yeah.
B
Yeah
but,
but
I
think
this
I
mean
you
know,
I
guess
we
need
to
have
some
hypotheses
around
what
the
focus
groups
will
yield
and
not,
but
you
know
how
do
members
reason
about
buying
selling
or
holding
tech?
A
Have
there?
Yes,
I
mean,
I
think
this
was
this
will
be
solved
in
a
little
sense,
with
the
risk
aversion
or
like
being
to
invest
it
into
the
system.
So
it
will
be
like
an
economic
incentive
as
well.
So
as
long
as
you
are
very
invested
into
the
system
and
if
we
think
only
in
a
pure
economic
sense
right,
you
will
be
wanting
to
maximize
your
already
invested
early
on
funds.
A
So
you
will
be
holding,
I
guess
and
if
you
are
more
risk-averse
and
you
are
expecting
sure
profits
and
you
have
all
the
investments
and
you
are
really
diversified-
maybe
an
investor
as
such.
That
can
be
also
here
in
the
defender
in
commons,
because
we
know
we
have
like
original
token
designers.
So
they
are
also
interested
in
other
positions.
But
you,
you
will
be
opting
out
because
you
don't
see
like
this
public
goodies
really
being
realized.
So
maybe
you
ought
to
exit.
A
I
guess
the
the
economy
for
the
aversion
versus
holding
investments
in
the
community.
E
E
Not
just-
and
I
think
all
of
that
really
belongs
into
the
focus
group-
I'm
I'm
happy
that
we
already
wanna
kind
of
start
talking
about
specific
issues
in
there,
but
we're
gonna
prepare
some
text
like
a
paragraph,
each
as
an
invitation
to
the
focus
group
and
basically
bring
bring
to
paper
what
what
we
just
talked
about
and
and
what
the
feedback
we
got
from.
You.
B
B
Yeah,
so,
okay,
and
then
I
I
think
here
or
let
me
finish
that
that
one
one
thought
if
that
is
happening
so
now
here
we
see.
C
Go
ahead
now,
just
one
question
for
us
also
with
the
timing
now,
because
you
said
in
the
beginning
that
maybe
july
might
be
difficult,
because
people
might
be
they're
a
lot
of
community
events,
so
people
might
not
be
available.
So
the
idea
could
I
mean
we
are
flexible.
We
can
also
do
it
in
algos.
That
all
goes
no.
C
B
C
E
B
24
26
in
two
weeks:
let's
try
because
the
first
focus
group
it
seems
to
be
I'm
not
saying
simple
but
like
easy
to
organize.
I
would
just
say
I
think
these
were
basically
ideas
of
how
to
you
know.
C
A
B
A
B
Okay,
can
you
hear
me
yeah?
Okay,
so
now
I'm
trying
to
help
the
so
lydia
and
felix
are
saying:
okay,
we
need
to
keep
the
focus
groups
focused
else.
It's
going
to
be
difficult
to
analyze
and
so
on
totally
agree
so
and
I'm
trying
to
help
there,
but
at
the
same
time
the
t,
ethics
or
definitely
I
would
love
to
have
an
update
or
a
proper
conducted
focus
group
on
tsx.
B
Also
from
our
side,
maybe
better
prepared
with
more
concrete
questions
and
in
there
my
suggestion
would
be.
You
know,
keep
these
biosystems
with
our
value
systems
and
so
on
how
ethics
will
come
up,
but
at
the
same
time,
this
whole
profit
thing
will
also
come
up
and
in
on
second
one,
we
focus
on
private
profit
versus
common
benefits.
B
B
About
token
engineering
ethics,
you
know
we,
and
especially
because
you
know
we
put
it
up
there,
but
there
is
literally
no
resources
other
than
zargham's
article,
also
really
coming
from
as
a
public
good
to
be
used
by
token
engineers
right
so,
and
our
attempt
basically
to
try
and
create
principles
and
and
and
practice
sessions
was
really
good.
B
But
again
I
had,
for
example,
issues
with
it
having
to
be
funded
somehow
and
having
to
find
yeah
like
funding
ethical
ethics,
research
about
ethics
having
to
ask
and
then
go
and
having
to
market
it,
and
we
even
had
discussions
about.
Oh,
we
need
to
make
ethics
sexy
and
for.
F
B
D
We
can,
I
suggest
that
we
maybe
look
at
the
stuff
that
manu
was
dealing
with
with
the
marty
ascends
capabilities
approach,
which
seems
to
meld
all
the
parts
together
about.
You
know
the
ethics
with
the
capacity
of
the
individuals
right.
B
D
B
A
B
A
I
think
we
should
look
at
the
top-down
dynamics
in
the
system
because
we
were
like
trying
to
incentivize
those
with
the
ai
or
with
the
talking
design,
but
we
really
didn't
think
about
the
terminal
characters
that
were
studies.
So
it's
like
this
contrarian
effect
that
was
like
having
this
immense
voice
into
the
community,
but
I
think
it
was
not
seen.
This
was
an
unseen
thing
in
the
system,
so
we
couldn't.
A
We
couldn't
really
know
where
to
happen
because
it
was
not
seen
it
was
in
the
dark
space,
so
this
is
in
the
yeah.
It
will
go
back
to
our
system.
There
were
like
several
places
we
were
like
in
the
dark
matter
in
the
dark
space.
This
was
one
of
them
like
the
synergistic
mechanisms
that
were
embedded
in
the
top-down
hierarchies
and
the
working
different
circles,
and
I
think
that's
that
comes
down
a
little
bit
to
that.
A
Issue,
it
was
the
issue
like
we
were
well,
I
don't
know,
what's
the
issue,
it's,
like
my
guys,
say
my
personal,
an
ethical
opinion.
Maybe
in
this
moment
I
don't
know
if
it's
like
this
is
the
actual
working
group
or
ethical,
the
second
focus
or
not,
but
I
will
say
like
if
I
look
back
now.
A
I
I
think
we
started
with
this
broad
and
super
passionate
embrace
fine,
yes,
kind
of
new
talking
designs
with
these
technical
values,
but
those
were
two
conducted
conducted
by
people
that
have
other
power
in
the
community
right
or
they
were
very
busy,
and
so
the
working
groups
also
became
embedded
with
kind
of
leadership
that
I
don't
I
don't
say
it's
it's
it's
bad
in
a
way,
but
it
it
was
proclaimed
that
stigmas
will
be
stigmas
as
long
as
they
wanted
in
a
sense,
so
they
were
like
putting
their
culture
inside
a
working
or
is
it
like
they're
working
in
this
talking
mechanism,
some
salaries
by
themselves,
and
they
were
distributed,
no
matter
what
so
that
was
the
mechanistic
design
of
it
like
it
was
salary
by
hour
and
then
by
the
culture
of
the
working
group.
A
So,
though,
that
was
a
top
down
that
I
mean,
even
if
we
say
well,
there
was
agreement
mamas,
which
is
very,
but
then
you
are
putting
out
a
system,
a
dynamic
that
is
gonna,
recreate
a
certain
kind
of
culture.
Even
if
we
are
starting
from
the
top
down
that
we
won't
get
the
values,
then
don't
work
with
that
insider
working
groups
too,
and
we
have
a
culture
that
is
spread
to
working
groups.
A
B
B
D
Well,
it's
also
true
that
people
will
tend
to
if
they're
focusing
on
like
this.
I
have
lost
track
of
the
number
of
meetings
that
I've
been
where
we're
saying
what
the
tec
is
a
do
occur.
D
B
B
B
E
B
We
really
need
support
with
is
what
what
questions
and
how
are
they
posed.
Like
I'm
sure,
there
is
a
method
to
asking
the
right
questions
in
the
right
way,
and
I
don't
know
I
if
I
speak
for
the
group,
we
don't
really
know,
and
that
would
be
great
to
have.
E
E
Yeah
sure
we
will
prepare
an
interview
guide
for
each
of
the
focus
groups
as
soon
as
we
have
it
narrowed
down.
E
So
I
think
first,
we
will
write
a
paragraph
each
on
each
of
the
focus
groups
and
make
that
as
a
proposal
to
really
tie
things
down,
because
the
outcome
of
the
focus
group
is
gonna,
be
the
better
the
more
focused
we
are
on
one
theme
or
even
question
so
by
bringing
it
to
paper
and
then
all
kind
of
agreeing
on
that
and
that
having
having
basically
as
a
description
that
everyone
reads
before
the
focus
group
starts,
really
helps.
E
And
then,
as
soon
as
we
have
agreed
on
these
paragraphs,
we
will
develop
interview
guides
for
each
of
these
focus
groups.
Right
and
these
we
will.
I
think.
E
Yeah
will
be
disrupted
by
us,
as
there
should
be
some
kind
of
difference
in
the
roles
between
us
facilitators,
interviewers
and
participants
to
the
focus
group.
C
Don't
you
need
any
help
methods,
also
in
the
in
the
focus
group
discussion,
so
it
doesn't
have
to
be
like,
like
I
don't
know,
some
creative
methods,
maybe
as
well
like
shortly
short
yeah.
B
B
Okay
for
the
values,
I
would
really
suggest
to
sift
through
t
comments,
and
we
also
asked
libya
for
support
two
three
core
values.
I
mean
soft
call
literally,
the
the
home
of
token
engineering,
commons
values
all
of
the
mission
mission
work.
Do
you
have
good
contact
to
lydia,
vivi
and.
B
E
B
Okay
and
and
I'll
also
ask
her
and
then
maybe
if
she
needs
more
background
and
if
she's,
if
she
can
make
time,
maybe
this
week
we're
lucky
because
it's
the
weekend
between
barcelona
and
paris,
let's
reach
out
to
her,
and
I
think
she
can
also
tell
okay.
You
know
we
had
an
update
of
the
vision
mission
that
I
used.
People
voted
on
them
and
so
on.
B
So
she
really
has
instead
of
values
and
then
maybe
she
can
help
and
say:
oh
yeah,
let's
pick
these
three
because
they
were,
I
don't
know,
debated
what
have
you
or
maybe
she
also
said
hey.
B
Let's
look
at
those
values
that
we,
you
know
decided
to
put
forth
here
and
I
think
olivia's
really
the
the
go
to
person
there
and
also
help
reaching
out
that
we
get
a
good
representative
of
people
new
to
token
engine
comments,
but
also
you
know,
hatchers
the
ones
who
basically
pulled
it
off
common
sense
people,
but
as
well
as
token
engineering.
B
Okay,
is
this
okay
and
the
second
one
I
think
edu
communities,
because
he
or
or
he
has
you
know
who
is
the
hatchery
and
so
on
that
type
of
info
and
who
we
should
reach
out
to,
and
the
reason
I
am
proposing
working
groups
is,
I
believe
these
topics
are
also
beneficial
to
those
working
groups.
B
You
know
that
we
get
also
stakeholders
interested
in
in
the
outcomes
of
these
focus
groups
and,
of
course,
the
ethics
part
from
us,
whatever
you
need,
but
we
definitely
need
help
and
in
how
to
conduct
this
yeah,
and
then
we
get
people
and
we
will
be
discussing
okay
and
in
the
analysis,
if
you
need
additional
support
there
as
well,
we
do
our
best.
F
B
But
yeah
just
tell
us.
B
Okay,
cool
good:
that's
an
update.
E
Thank
you
so
much
for
taking
the
time
was
yeah
a
bit
more
than
half
an
hour.
Now,
no.
B
E
I
just
use
a
location,
we
just
published
the
call
for
the
crypto
commons
gathering
22.
That
is
what.
D
E
It's
the
second
edition
of
the
crypto
commons
gathering
again
in
the
austrian
alps.
That's
the
crypto
commons
hub
and
it
starts
on
august
27th
and
ends
on
september
2nd.
So
it's
seven
full
days
and
it's
an
unconference
on
yeah,
the
state
of
art
of
crypto
commons,
both
theoretical
questions
and
more
practical
and
political
and
embedded
discussions
pretty
much
everything
but
price.
B
Yeah
yeah,
no,
I
already
said
mart
is
someone
who
would
really
benefit
from
connecting
with
the
cryptocurrency.
I
think,
but
he
just
left
like
I
see,
but
yeah
definitely
also
share
the
link.
Thank
you
I'll
do
that
here.
Okay,
so
now
we
get
to.
B
A
Okay,
this
is
updates
from
the
what's
new
in
the
documentary.
I
would
know
something.
So
that's
the
last
update
we
have
for
me.
B
Yeah,
I
think
this
current
objective.
I
like
this.
It's
like
we're
like
a
flock
and
and
depending
on
how
much
budget
energy
budget
we
we
have
and
then
what
is
currently
drawing
energizing
or
needs
our
energies,
it's
kind
of
where
we're
moving
so
current
objective.
It
also
shows
dynamics.
So
it's.
I
definitely
like
that
to
focus
of
all
of
that.
That's
really
such
a
pity,
but
it
is
what
it
is
I
mean
she
did
so
much
and
and
supporting
or
creating
support
satori.
B
So
this
facilitating
of
calls
and
so
on,
as
a
tourism.
Here,
I
almost
feel
like
yeah.
It
would
be
great
if
we
continue
with
this
type
of
innovation
and
experimenting
with
that
going
on.
But
the
story
is
this
week:
at
the
very
least
on
the
road
he
said,
yeah
and-
and
I
guess
you
know
if,
if
I
have
to
facilitate,
then
I
will
fall
back
to
my
coping
mechanism,
which
is
like
okay,
what
needs
most
attention.
A
A
B
Yeah
yeah,
so
deb
improve
pitch
collective
creation.
B
So
deb
is,
you
know,
jean's
research
calling
like
imaginarium
is
the
calling
of
satori
and
so
on,
and,
and
we
just
always
need
to
be
or
need
to
yeah.
You
know
if
we,
if
we
do
to
do
here,
that
we
kind
of
contextualize
right
so
and,
and
that
for
me,
is
totally
in
context.
You
do.
The
way
I
see
is
like
asking
okay,
what
are
the
insights,
what
is
new
and
and
then
trying
to
use
it?
A
Accounting
for
energy
value
of
those
which
are
very
connected
to
sally
guerner,
so
it's
like
a
research
question
and
I
see
as
we
are
seeing
any
research
question
takes
time
and
if
we
are
pressure
on
this
sign
or
the
results
of
that
design,
we
are
just
specifying
and
being
in
use
case
as
the
postage
in
their
original
question.
How
would
you
run
our
to
public
goods
without
really
having
availability
to
have
a
super
budget
before
the
beginning?
So
it's
like,
we
are
near
peaks.
It's
like
we're
experimenting
with
this
yeah.
A
B
You
know,
and
now
the
business
model
all
of
a
sudden
turns
out
to
make
profit
so
show
profit.
Yeah.
A
But
I
don't
see
benefits
as
a
problem,
because
benefits
can
be
in
a
lot
of
realms
for
the
human
spirit
and
mind.
So
if
just
proclaim
and
say
that
the
problem
is
profiting
the
benefit,
we're
in
a
scarcity
mind
and
that's
really
a
winner.
B
No
yeah
yeah,
but
again
from
that
experience,
if
we
would
for
regenerative
workforce
for
supporting
that
research,
if
we
would
really
ask
for
funding-
and
I
mean
to
support
the
research
and-
and
people
are
doing
this
right-
I
would
say:
let's
make
this
super
explicit
right,
because
what
I
don't
appreciate
at
all
is
you
know,
after
every
stewards
call
somehow
martha
and
not
last
time
also
manu
coming
super
stressed
out.
What
is
the
status
number
one?
I
really
want
everyone
to
read:
agile,
too.
B
It's
a
really
good
collaboratively
written
a
handbook.
I
would
say
on
yeah.
B
B
F
F
B
Yeah,
so
let's
make
this,
you
know
main
case
that
anyone
advising
on
that
pro
proposal
are
putting
their
conviction
on
really
has
to.
B
You
know,
provide
feedback
on
that
topic
because
it's
like
yeah,
it's
like
how
do
durga
says
you
know
when
it
comes
to
it.
It's
like,
oh,
but
we
have
to
get
things
done,
do
do
do
and
report
on
progress
and
again
in
the
startup
world.
There's
a
word
for
it:
vanity
metrics
right,
you
show
progress,
and
then
you
show
big
numbers
and
then
we
we're
on
boarding
170.
B
I
don't
know,
people
are
growing
more
and
more
people
are
coming
in
coming
into
what
did
we
produce
more
public
goods
and
token
engineering?
That
should
be
the
metric
right.
So
again,
I
really
like
next
time
also
for
the
proposal
version
two.
The
thing
is,
the
library
is
simple.
B
But
for
dredging
workforce,
if
you
go
for
for
funding
that,
I
would
really
make
make
that
a
big
point
and
really
take
see
to
it
that
we
get
people
who
fought
it's
again.
There's
a
word
for
this
called
smart
money,
that's
money
or
funding
that
comes
from
people
who
are
really
interested
in
the
same
outcome
or
in
the
same
insights
that
you
are
interested
in
in
your
research
at
or
in
your
style.
B
B
Okay,
so
I'll
just
chase
my
to
to
explain
and
also
to
list
the
wallet,
who's
signing
and
so
on,
and
once
we
have
that
I
updated
the
others
on
monday.
B
So
we
have
an
opportunity
to
work
with
magic
power,
they're
really
interested
in
the
whole
self-discovery
navigation
or
gamified
navigation
and
they're,
really
good
and
not
truncating
the
complexity,
but
helping
make
things
simple
for
for
the
start,.
B
At
least
some
mock-ups,
but
high-fidelity
mock-ups
is
what
they
really
do
well
and
if
you
could
capture
in
the
mock-ups
the
really
the
progress
that
people
in
the
imaginarium
made
with
this
choose
your
own
adventure
and
then,
whilst
discovering
knowledge,
you
discover
yourself
and
you
discover,
connections
to
other
token
engineers,
and
there
is
the
potential.
D
B
So
since,
since
I
don't
know
ethics,
I
don't
know
if
the
other
value
system,
private
profit
versus
common
benefit-
I
don't
know
it's,
maybe
political,
political
economy
or
so,
but
definitely
philosophy,
law
and
ethics
is
one
petal
of
the
cryptoeconomics
flower
and
what
I
was
thinking
I
don't
know,
maybe
it
resonates
or
we
have
more
better
ideas
is,
if
you,
for
example,
are
going
to
have
a
discord
for
the
library
and
we
have
and
these
curation
level
channels
it
could
have
interconnections
we
could
also
have
petals
and,
for
example,
there
could
be
the
focus
group
three
could
be
in.
B
B
I
don't
know
if
that
resonates
somehow
that,
but
that
we
have
a
community
or
a
learning
space.
For
that.
A
There
was
actually
this
core
server
being
created
by
nick,
but
we
are
like
they're,
four
or
five
people,
because
this
piece
was
made
when
we
were
trying
to
come
up
with
okay.
Do
we
need
like
a
separate
way
to
contain
all
the
creations?
It
was
like
our.
A
B
What
what
do
you
think
I
mean,
even
if
that
there
needs
to
be
a
place
more
than
the
the
thread
in
omega,
where,
where
discussions
around
the
library
can
happen
both
while
building
it
as
well
as
while
using
prototypes
or
building
or
doing
curations,
and
so.
A
On
yes-
and
we
had
that
feeling
that
we
needed,
like
this
whole
user
experience,
so
we
were
creating
on
the
omega,
but
we
have
like
the
discord,
specific
library
discord
server,
maybe
because
we
were
living
with
also
communities
and
software
to
have
this
kind
of
container
too
and
at
the
same
time
we're
creating.
So
maybe
it
was
too
much
for
us
to
cope
with,
but
we'll
be
doing
all
these
kind
of
workflows
having
the
disco
server
and
having
the
library
created
to
have
the
nft
game.
A
So
it
was
all
coming
together
in
a
sense.
So
yes-
and
we
did
their
wifi
creation-
maybe
with
the
bootcamp,
we
maybe
have
the
repositories
or
create
something
like
more
yeah.
A
B
So
the
refi
bootcamp
is
starting
this
this
friday,
but
it
is
very
dynamic
as
well.
I
don't
know
if
we
are
going
to
get
them
immediately,
but
they're
already
creating
reading
lists
and
so
on.
A
Yeah-
and
I
would
heard
also
an
excel
doc
from
one
of
the
mentors
there
and
he's
already
like
writing
this
excel
doc,
and
I
was
sure
there-
and
I
think
I
I
have
to
post
this
in
our
college-
curation
right
so
in
omega.
So
we
can
just
say:
okay
continue
this
excel.
Do
we
go
to
other
so
re-linking
this
with
our
omega
okay,
cool.
B
Okay,
good,
then
I
don't
want
to
take
more
of
your
times.
B
Okay,
I
will
chase
match
for
the
distribution
of
funds
and
then
definitely
be
more
active
on
wrapping
up
and
then
creating
a
design
spec
from
what
has
been
done,
and
hopefully
with
the
support
of
magic
part,
even
creating
a
few
good.
You
know
mock-ups
that.
B
Capture
the
essence
and
but
put
it
out
there
beautifully,
so
we
get
appropriate
funding
and
support
for
actually
building
out,
but
from
there
I
think
it's
really
a
thing
on
its
own.
We
can
definitely
add
a
token
model
there,
and
it
already
has
various
outlets
like
the
gallery
of
staff.
B
Satori
is
thinking
to
link
in
it
to
minds
and
so
on
I'll,
definitely
link
it
somehow
to
the
book
and
then
whatever
any
one
of
us
comes
up
with
there
is
this
multiplying
value
flows
where
we
can
yeah
generate
revenues,
and
can
you
know
it's
like
steph's
cups,
fill
the
cups
and
then
also
flow
back
to
the
to
the
omega,
not
omega,
but
to
the
consensus
library?
I
think
that
will
be
quite
easy
and
it
will
be
also
for
tech
tokens.
B
So
I
think
it's
really
a
good,
really
really
good
effort,
worthwhile
effort.
A
Yeah.
Thank
you
thanks
for
yes
leading
us
again
to
this
original
question,.
B
Yeah
yeah,
if
you
don't
have
the
people
who
can
not
energize
the
additional
areas,
it's
just
going
to
fall
back
to
the
minimum
yeah.
That's
because.
A
Like
we
don't
have
it,
because
we
were,
that
was
like
a
form
of
for
us
to
experiment
with
our
current
energy
types,
but
what
I
also
love
human
design-
and
maybe
that's
like
something
we
need
to
explore
more
in
a
sense
because
it's
like,
if
we
don't
update
our
energy
footprints
or
imprints,
we
will
go
back
again.
I
mean
there
is
no
more
energy
coming
into
the
system.
It's
true
that
we'll
be
optimizing
for
us.
The
original
estate
thing
like
for
the
egoistic
mind,
so
yeah
yeah
say
that.
B
But
yeah
again
I
mean
when
satori
is
back,
I'm
sure
he
can.
He
can
do
some
different
facilitation.
I
definitely
know
that
we
need
these
type
of
shakers.
B
Okay.
Thank
you.
Everyone,
for
you,
know
your
participation
as
always
and
really
look
forward
to
the
token
engineering
focus
groups.
So,
let's,
oh
yeah,
one
question:
does
any
one
of
you
have
a
good
good
contact
or
open
communication
to
add
you
and
communities?