►
From YouTube: W40 0mega WG: Process, Creative & Energy Flows & More!
Description
The 0mega Working Group examines the ethos of and ethics in token engineering as well as the shared vision and diversity of its communities.
We gather every two weeks on Wednesday at 8pm CET.
Steward: Sebnem
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
C
A
D
C
A
I
kind
of
started
to
do
that
with
the
here
I'll
share
really
quickly.
If
that's
okay.
F
A
Hey
there
so
on
on
the
specific
project
pages,
you
can
kind
of
start
seeing
here,
for
example,
the
regenerative
workflow
you
can
kind
of
start
seeing
how
they
relate
to
each
other.
So,
for
example,
like
satori
and
jeans,
dub
imaginarium
calls
it
kind
of
informs
the
dynamic
energy
budget
technical
cult
as
well,
and
then
from
there
we're
synthesizing
like
the
the
the
prototype
and
then.
C
E
E
So
if,
if
nick
you
want
to
share
the
screen
with
participants
or
for
the
recording-
and
I
think
you
already
also
introduced
very
well
at
the
agenda
of
today
right
so
basically,
first
of
all
welcome
everyone-
and
I
don't
know
if
you,
if
you
want
to
make
a
check-in
round
or
connect
to
the
senses.
E
E
E
You
know
what
are
the
first
principles
that
we,
at
least
in
the
beginning,
over
one
and
a
half
years
ago,
decided
we
can
put
together
and
know
that
and
again
omega.
We
decide
here
to
explore
this
decentralized,
decentralization
and
autonomy,
maybe
up
to
its
limits,
meaning
you
know.
E
We
said
it's
not
going
to
be
another
meeting
another
work,
another
session
you
have
to
just
get
into,
but
actually
a
place
for
people
in
the
space
who
want
to
make
sense
of
of
it
all
and
because
omega
also
focuses
on
token
entering
ethos
and
ethics.
It
was
just
important
to
hold
that
space
and
not
structure
it,
but
see
what
emerges
and
it
seems
self
sovereignty.
E
And
before
going
in
there
too
much
is
that
we
had
some
experiments.
E
We
pulled
actually
to
pull
through
ideating
around
initiatives
creating
common
sense
over,
I
would
say,
an
improv
phase
over
a
year,
but
we
also
managed
to
go
through
the
structured
process
of
token
entering
comments,
meaning
you
make
a
proposal
and
then
you
explain
why
that
what
you
are
asking
support
for
is
going
to
a
public
good
for
token
engineering.
E
E
Like
working
style
together,
people
came
in
came
out.
We
had
no
roles
defined.
Just
you
know.
Yes,
I
took
the
role
of
stuart
and
because
I
really
felt
that
this
is
important,
but
now
there
are
just
so
many
more
people
who
feel
the
importance
and
yeah.
I'm
just
amazed
just
want
to
say
that
that
it
seems
to
be
working
that
people
actually
connect
over
values
instead
of
over
tasks
and
assignments,
and
so
on.
So
today,.
E
Defining
what
what
it
is
that
we
are
doing
in
terms
such
that
it
also
computes
within
the
predefined
rules
and
and
guidelines
of
token
engineering
commons.
E
So,
typically,
if
you
go
into
other
working
groups,
you
will
need
a
scrum
like
project
execution
and
that's
what
we
would
call
here
process
flow,
so
we
we
will
have
these
processes.
E
We
have
predefined
processes
for
token
engineering
commons
to
work.
That's
how
we
interact
with
the
augmented
bonding
curve
via
means
of
proposals
that
have
this
advice
process
then
later
on.
It
goes
into
conviction,
process
and
in
between
you
have
all
the
hoops
that
not
hoops
but
steps
that
you
need,
so
that
needs
to
take
so
that
these,
especially
this
funding
and
funds
distribution
processes
can
be
automated,
are
automated
against
the
bonding
curve
and
they
are
transparent.
E
They
are
auditable
at
any
time
and
so
on.
Right
now,
here
in
this
document,
I
also
go
in
there.
We
have
the
basic
process
flow.
That's
really
this!
This
is
what
we
have
done
to
iterate
once
through
the
token
engineering
commons
process,.
E
And
there
are
some
things
I
think
we
should
just
go
through
once.
E
Any
questions
that
you
might
have,
please
ask
them
so
that
this
description
actually
answers
questions
and
we
know
what
questions
come
up
and
there
are
some
things
that
I
want
to
share
from
this
experience.
What
actually
is
not
written
anywhere,
but
what
needs
to
be
done
in
order
to
actually
create
also
yeah,
not
momentum,
but
what
you
would
typically
do
in
an
organization.
E
E
So
these
are
other
process
steps
that
we
can
discuss
and
then
once
we're
through
the
swans,
I
would
like
us
to
actually
make
around
and
share
especially
of
those
who
have
started
these
different
working
styles
and
different
areas
of
work
where
we
have
the
more
creative
cradle
flows,
but
also
that
is
something
that
came
into
working
group
omega,
but
definitely
had
energized
people.
So
we
picked
it
up.
It's
the
dynamic
energy
budget.
E
To
model
how
we
are
sharing
funds
and
our
contributions,
which
are
also
energy,
we
input
into
the
systems
and
how
we
actually
digest
and
and
what
we
turn
it
into
right.
So
that's
a
huge
research
project,
but
I
think
we
are
keen
on
looking
into
how
to
apply
it
actually
for
also
for
funds,
distribution
which
would
be
pretty.
How
do
you
call
it
pretty
hands-on
and
we
can
just
try
it
out,
for
example,
in
the
workflow
of
creating
the
token
entering
coincidence,
library,
but
also
it
is
research,
so.
E
It
has
to
have
this
creative
freedom
or
what
we
used
to
say
economic
freedom
kind
of
it
might
end
up
with
the
insight
that
it
wouldn't
work
or
not
in
that
sentence
and
not
in
in
one
way
or
the
other,
that
we
thought
it
would
work
and
in
in
research.
Actually,
every
insight
counts
and
token
engineering
has
that
experiment
driven
mindset
has
to
because
it's
a
very
complex
domain,
so
kind
of
it's
it's
helping
people
to
find
ways
to
actually
move
from
them.
E
You
know
industrial
age,
task,
distribution,
bounties
and
getting
things
done
to
actually
interacting
and
creating
value
and
sharing
value
in
much
much
more
complex
and
intertwined
networks.
So
it's
a
research
project.
E
Now
today's
focus
one
once
we
go
through
this
process
flow
and
then
add
our
insights,
how
we
actually
put
at
the
token
engine,
continuous
library
through
the
process
floor.
E
But
obviously
these
things
are
insightful
also
for
a
decentralized
autonomous
organization
that
realize
okay,
you
know
just
automating
some
processes
and
and
buttons
pushing
buttons.
It's
not
all.
Actually
it's
a
human
coordination
problem
that
we're
getting
at
and
it
requires
more
innovative
and
imaginative
ways
and
more
human
ways
to
actually
relate
to
each
other.
E
Maybe
it's
going
to
be
harder
for
those
who
are
used
to
work
also
in
their
day.
Job
in
this
creative
flow.
Ask
any
questions
that
you
have
about
now.
The
process
flow
that
we
have
in
token
entering
commons
and
about
how
you
think
the
work
that
you
have
been
contributing
can
be
part
of
the
ground
work,
a
research
groundwork
of
omega.
E
If
you
feel
that
your
contribution
or
what
you
would
love
to
contribute
doesn't
fit,
then
also
raise
your
hand.
Even
if
you
don't
get
to
that
point,
I
would
definitely
take
it
on
to
the
agenda
summary
and
somehow
either
next
week
or
offline,
meaning
in
the
chat
continue
that
discussion,
because
now
it's
about
updating
the
working
group
omega
manifesto,
the
work
style
session,
which
will
state
that
we
are
experimenting
with
regenerative,
workflows
and
inclusive
workflows,
embedding
multiple
different
work.
Styles,
what
else
yeah?
E
G
I
I
put
it,
I
put
it
there
on
the
agenda.
I
also
think
it's
very
important
for
us
to
sort
of
like
do
a
demo
or
like
which
is
the
first
point
I
put
there
considering
inspiration
practical
example
format.
Guidelines
like
we
can
go
into
the
the
notion
page
and
there's
a
couple
of
you
know:
there's
a
sargon
one
and
there's
one
about
me,
but
if
you.
E
Okay,
gotcha,
but
that
needs
to
go
into
the
topic
bucket
and
if
you
say
this
needs
like
we
can
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
next
week
directly
just
make
it
I
help
you
like
today
is
really
about
talking
in,
like
the
work
group
groundwork
and
next
week
we
can
make
it
about
the
token
engineering,
consultants,
library
again,
so
the
tokens
and
content
library
also
again
it's
an
initiative
within
and
it
has
going
to
it,
has
workflows
and
test
contributors,
etc.
E
A
Cool,
so
you
want
us
to
imagine
how
an
alternative
to
the
current,
like
proposal.
E
No,
no!
No!
No!
No!
It's
really
like
the
working
group
omega.
We
have
the
initial
initiative
technology
consultants,
library
funded.
The
working
group
omega
has
contributors
and
amazing
work
being
done
right
and
the
whole
token.
During
ethics,
for
example,
it
was
planned
as
an
initiative,
but
I
think
it
needs
to
be
fed,
not,
I
think,
but
actually
that
came
out
through
discussions
that
it
needs
to
be
fed
through
some
research
groundwork
and
that
research
groundwork
is
what
we're
going
to
write
into.
The
proposal
of
funding
working
group
omega
is
fundamental
contributions.
E
A
E
So
yeah,
and
basically
now
those
of
you
who
have
been
doing
research
groundwork
like
energy
flow,
dynamic,
energy
budget,
creative
flow
and
the
whole
onboarding,
with
the
energizing
levels,
etc.
Again,
these
are
all
ground
work
in
working
group
omega,
like
we
we're
doing
things
differently
already.
Now
we
have
to
write
this
into
our
working
group
omega
proposal,
why
this
work
should
be
funded,
how
much
and
for
whom,
who
is
doing
this
work
so
that
we
get
the
people
the
contributors
acknowledged
appropriately
and
then
also.
E
I
would
as
always
make
a
point
that
we
describe
it
in
such
a
way
and
also
think
how
can
we
make
these
things
accessible
to
token
engineers
and
token
economy?
Participants,
like
everything
we're
doing
here,
actually
is
useful
as
a
token
engineering
commons,
as
a
public
goods
for
people
who
might
be
struggling
with
the
same
issues,
for
example
right
so.
E
E
So
let's
go:
let's
go
into
the
notion
and
maybe
I'll
make
some
annotations,
so
we
can
also
use
it
directly.
So
here
basically,
maths
is
started
with
the
obvious
things.
The
advice
process
informed
discussions,
but
typically
and
as
you
have
now
been
experiencing.
E
Before
you
can
put
a
proposal,
there
is
a
formation
of
an
idea
and
and
or
even
fermenting
of
ideas
like
process
step.
Zero
is
basically
proposal
for
media.
E
No
strange,
oh,
I
have
to
repre
refresh
okay
now
we're
getting
we're
understanding
how
how
notion
works.
So
I
have
to
type
and
refresh,
let
me
see
as
because
now
it's
refreshed
and
it's
deleted
on
my
end.
Wait
a
second
one!
Second
one!
Second,
we
reverse
engineering.
How
notion
works
proposal
formation
so
now
I
refresh
it.
E
E
So
now,
in
that
proposal
formation
now,
let's
see
do
you
remember
how
token
engineering
coincidence
library
formed?
E
Yes,
we
were.
Maybe
you
give
give
a
short
short
intro.
C
We
were
discussing
the
omnifesto
with
the
omnifest
I
think,
like
in
the
middle
of,
and
then
like.
We
wanted
to
create
new
things
in
this
embodied
state,
so
we
realized
that
the
integral
theory
was
very
relevant
too,
and
we
were
talking
about
many
many
philosophers
and
complex
thinking
theories
and
then
because
wilbur
was
too
bro.
We
couldn't
just
focus
on
wilbur
because
we
said
okay,
the
quadrants
and
all
the
integral
theory
is
very
relevant
to
everything.
C
C
Nothing
like
we
wanted
to
focus
the
problem
with
the,
which
is
the
problem,
and
it's
like
if
you
focus
on
only
one
discipline
and
you
are
not
jumping
across
the
whole
crypto
flower
wilson
was
setting
up
the
problem
and
on
in
the
omni
festival
we
said
we
were
moving
from
wilson.
That
is
the
constituent's
book
to
like
embody
now
more
integral
theory,
with
kirk
and
wilbur,
and
all
their
liberation
systems.
E
And
yeah
and
that's
throughout
the
throughout
the
work
and
throughout
also
our
exchanges
literally
become
you
know,
embodying
the
wisdom
of
web
three,
which
is
that
our
eglan?
I
think
people
really
resonate
that
like.
E
Why
do
we
think
this
library
has
to
be
different,
needs
to
be
different
because
we're
way
beyond
or
we
need
to
be
way
beyond
just
acquiring
knowledge
collecting
knowledge?
But
actually
you.
C
E
So
in,
in
short,
basically,
you
know
through
this
work,
we
came
with
this
unity
and
diversity
as.
E
A
as
a
principal,
a
sort
of
right,
we
have
this
diverse
background,
talking
entering
ethos
and
so
on,
and
we
don't
want
to
just
subscribe.
You
know
this
is
the
way,
because
that's
not
it.
That's
not
talking
engineering
or
crypto
economics
at
all
about,
but
that's
why
it's
also
so
hard
to
learn
like
there
is
no
book
there
is
no
textbook
and
will
never
be
etc.
But
there
are
so
many
many
insights
that
the
con,
the
crypto
economics
flower,
drawing
from
many
disciplines,
transdisciplinarity
and
drawing
from
many
disciplines.
E
Everything
that
people
have
ever
created
frameworks
around
all
things,
coordination
and
all
things
resource
allocation.
This
is
basically
how
in
the
foundations
of
crypto
economics,
paper
and
sherman
and
zargan
came
up
with
this
cryptoeconomics
flower
that
we
just
took,
and
all
of
these
hints
and
then
purpose
or
principles
are
basically
pattern.
Recognition
that
we're
doing
like
we're
recognizing
patterns
that
exist
in
this
domain
or
in
this
emerging
field
and
we're
orienting
based
on
those
patterns.
E
There's
the
more
fat
three,
it's
a
huge
purpose.
If
you
think
about
what
that
would
mean
or
entail
when
you
say
you
know
this
wisdom
of
f3,
it's
this
academics,
background,
etc,
but
also
a
lot
of.
E
Fields
or
in
between
insights
that
are
also
new
and
emerging
like
consilience
itself.
These
are
the
things
that
we
want
to
pick
test,
work
with
and
really
embody
like
it
starts
with.
With
you
know,
self-knowledge.
E
A
So
it
is
this
basically
like
what
should
be
our
north
star
when,
when
we're
writing
or
thinking
of
initiatives
and
writing,.
E
Exactly
exactly
so
here,
maybe
after
this
call
I'll
continue
editing,
but
we
could
say
okay.
This
is
how
it
was
like
a
case
and
from
the
past
an
example.
This
is
how
we
actually
you
know,
came
up
with.
E
Oh,
we
should
have
a
library,
but
not
just
any
library,
not
a
list
of
you
know
that
you
go
through,
but
it's
different
and
you
can
also
read
in
the
manifesto
like
there
is
this
example
in
manifesto
of
when
we
say
our
work
style
is
the
actions
over
outcomes,
meaning
we
want
to
focus
on
meaningful
actions
that
we
can
take
now
versus
have
a
vision
of
what
a
library
is
today
and
deliver
on
that
vision
within
a
given
time
frame
like,
for
example,
exactly
focusing
on
outcome
would
be
we
set
ourselves
a
you
know,
deadline
work,
backwards,
break
down
what
needs
to
be
done
minimally
and
so
on,
and
then
we
could
have
within
two
weeks
a
library
put
together.
E
E
We
would
ask
some
hourly
rates
and
be
done
with
it,
but
we
said
we
will
do
it
differently
and
number
one
it
came.
It
brought
us
to
this
different
work
style
that
we
need
to
embed
idea.
I
don't
need
to
go
in
there
just
to
focus,
but
also
it
brought,
for
example,
participants
like
nick
and
who
actually
have
a
much
more
vivid
vision.
E
So
things
like
this
wouldn't
have
happened.
If
you
just
had
a
deadline
from
and
to
start,
the
community
would
have
had
a
library
last
year
already,
but
we
wouldn't
have
all
these
incense
along
the
way
and
also
it
helped
to
coordinate
basically
get
people
together
around
the
direction,
but
then
also
co-vision.
E
You
know
what
to
keep
in
mind
and
if
you,
you
know,
have
these
principles
in
mind,
and
I
think
you
know
t
ethics
and
ethos.
I
know
it's
very
broad,
but
for
me
it
actually
helps
to
to
focus
also.
E
And
that's
the
thing
like
is
it?
Is
it
so
one
of
the
insights
of
this
past
year's
discussions
also
is
like
what
is
the
common
pool
resource
like
if
you
have
participated
in
any
other
or
in
this
param
parties
etc.
Our
common
pool
in
token
engineering
commons
is
obviously
the
common
pool
like
this
x,
diet
that
accumulates
for
funding
things
like
the
working
group,
working
groups
or
other
proposals.
E
So,
and
that
is
knowledge
right
and
you
know
it's.
Basically,
it
gets
more,
it
gets
shared,
etc,
and
I
I
used
to
always
say
knowledge,
or
these
type
of
comments
are
not
comparable
to
to
fish
fish.
Commons,
like
what
a
strom
ostrom
actually
created
her
theories
around
like
scars.
E
E
Where
the
economics
is
different,
you
know
it
doesn't
get
depleted,
but
people
forget
me
included
that
those
digital
goods
and
services-
and
what
have
you
that
are
put
and
have
different
economies
of
scale-
are
still
put
together
by
people,
people
who
actually
can
be
depleted
literally
on
on
many
many
levels.
So
like
this
working
regenerative
work,
style,
research.
H
And
I
didn't
really
know
about
the
token
engineering
comments
only
from
like
their
website
and
things,
so
I
never
really
followed
the
process
of
like
the
engineering
academy
and
this
kind
of
stuff
or
university
or
yeah
like
so.
From
my
point
of
view,
it
was
kind
of
an
experience
of
like
which
I
also
had
in
my
previous
organization,
with
the
artist
comments
like
starting
something
from
an
idea
creating
a
community
dynamic,
a
kind
of
like
missionary.
A
H
So
I
had
like
this
kind
of
personal
feeling,
also
that
if
I
like
contributed
to
it-
but
I
didn't
know
like
how
it
works
on
the
back
end,
what's
the
organization
how's
the
economy
of
the
system,
and
then
I
felt
a
bit
like
I'm
just
like
contributing
to
something
I'm
not
really
expecting
anything
out
of
it,
but
like
over
the
course
of
a
few
months.
I
started
to
understand
that
there's
actually
a
much
larger
complexity
going
on.
E
So
I
think
it
that's
basically
a
hint
that
yes,
we
should
actually
explain
this.
Also
how
the
whole
proposal
up
to
the
economics
of
token
engineering
commons
works
like
how
do
those
proposals
maybe
relate,
if
at
all,
they
don't
currently,
but
we
get
funding
and
we
are
or
those
proposals
should
be
providing
to
the
public
good,
but
that
that
letter
condition
is
not
encoded
anywhere.
E
If,
as
far
as
I
can
see
so
that
is,
for
example,
something
we
can
make
an
improvement
proposal
that
the
the
proposals,
if
working
group
or
else,
should
at
least
provide
some
insights
or
something
that
is
useful
to
token
engineering
at
last
at
large
or
token
economy
participants.
You
know,
even
if
it's
just
explainers.
H
F
H
A
H
Learning
and
seeing
like,
if
there's
affinities
and
on
the
other
side,
maybe
other
newcomers
if
they
join
like
that
they
have
a
bit
of
like
maybe
like
a
one-pager
or
a
little
explanation.
A
E
A
E
The
community
working
group
creates
resources.
A
E
Okay,
so
so
that's
the
thing
like
we
can't
do
it
here.
What
we
do
here
is
we're
explaining,
within
the
omega
context,
how
the
token
and
dream
commons
works
right.
So,
but
definitely
we
could
also,
you
know,
give
this
feedback
to
the
community's
working
group
to
add
you
and
basically
tell
them
yeah
about
the
feedback
that
we've
been
trying
to
do.
We
have
done
this,
so
it
is
definitely
useful,
but
maybe
an
extraction
of
it
as
as
steph
says,
really
a
one
pager.
E
A
E
And
this
is
also
something
that
needs
updating
with
respect
to
our
groundwork,
like
there
are
and
information
about
work,
styles
and
so
on.
So
this
explains
actually
a
lot
the
overview,
but
it's
not
enough
to
be
able
to
go
through
the
proposal
in
process
without
hiccups
and
so
on.
E
E
We
have
a
okay
omega
should
be
in
there
and
if
not
it's
because
it
was
updated
for
so
long.
So
that's
part
of
the
whole.
This
current
up
update.
Okay,
that's
fine!
Okay,
so
again
like
there
is
a
lot
of
work,
groundwork
or
process
work.
That
also
needs
to
be
done.
Information
needs
to
be
put
together,
updated
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
E
E
Okay,
sorry,
I
got
a
few
phone
calls.
E
E
Why?
Because
it
is
useful
research,
insights
that
we
can
share
and
we
can
make
accessible
to
others
who
are
also
working
in
these
well
networks
that
are
just
connected
through
some
discord
channels.
Most
of
the
time.
E
E
E
Mart
isn't
here
and
nate
was
it
nate?
I
think
it
was
nate
who
also
asked
about
incentives
or
more
about
speculation,
meaning
incentivizing
for
speculation
that
that
might
bring
short-term
ease
but
but
long-term
menace
tool
to
a
community,
and
that
do
do
you
have
any
updates
there.
Nick.
A
So
until
the
30th
of
april,
our
goal
is
basically
to
research.
Current
existence.
Well,
do
this
until
the
30th
of
april
yeah,
okay,.
A
Incentive
design
research,
so
I
will
add
I'll
put
it
into
the
I'll
put
it
into
the
archipelago
and
kind
of
just
formulated.
E
It
yeah
so
and
that
actually
directly
plays
into
again
t
ethics,
so
that-
and
that
is
basically
why
we
more
or
less
restructured.
We
started
with
a
token
entering
ethics
initiative,
but
it
was
just
too
much
coordination,
too
much
pre-planning
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
For
so
many
people
who
are
actually
in
the
trenches,
it's
very
hard
to
you,
know,
get
in
sync
with
working
group,
omega
sessions
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
E
So
the
idea
is
to
have
this
research
as
the
groundwork
of
omega
and
basically
on
an
ongoing
basis.
We
can
have
research
proposals
and,
of
course,
they're
encouraged
if
they
basically
look
into
token
engineering
ethics,
how
to
foster
transdisciplinarity
unity
and
diversity
and
token
engineering
or
crypto
crypto
economics
ethos.
E
E
And
anything
that
contributes
to
the
ethics
will
be
always
and
that's
deal
will
always
so
working
group
omega,
no
matter
what
happens,
even
if
it's
sometimes
not
funded
or
whatever
or
just
one
person
standing
will
always
be
free
and
be
here,
for
you
know,
covering
all
things
token,
engineering,
ethics
or
holding
space
for
ethical
concerns
and
and
research
needs,
but
also
what
we
did
very
well
in
this
first
trial.
E
Of
our
token
engineering
ethics,
participatory
research
is
to
create
you
know
to
look
at
what
is
coming
up
and
if
we
can,
if
in
this
group
or
we
know
somewhere
else,
any
other
researchers
or
practitioners
actually
have
a
framework
that
could
help
people
practically
deal
with
an
ethical
principle
issue
concern.
E
Then
we
want
to
have
this
token
entering
ethics
practice
sessions.
We
should
always
strive
for
it.
You
know
just
to
have
ethical
principles.
You
know,
don't
do
this
or
do
that,
so
the
principles
are
not
described
like
the
ten
commandments,
but
these
are
just
principles
that
then
come
out
of
research
or
all
of
these
focus
groups
that
we
did.
E
Any
useful
tools,
frameworks
or
mental
models
in
place,
whatever
we
can
come
up
with,
or
we
know-
and
we
have
accessible
to
us
in
this
group
or
in
the
network
of
this
group
that
we
come
up
with
practice
sessions
because
that's
the
most
important
part
of
this
is
it's
applied,
applied.
E
It's
definitely
applied
research,
it
is
social,
institutional,
techno-economic,
research
and
it
is
in
effect
it's
like
you're
building
a
rocket
ship
because
blowing
up
can
cost
you
as
much
as
a
rocket
ship.
Almost
you
know,
300
millions
of
yeah
usd
worth
of
tokens
lost
that
could
have
been
put
to
good
use
these
type
of
things,
but
also
all
the
other,
really
ethical
issues
that
are
not
quantitatively
in
your
face,
but
actually
going
on
and
it's
hard
to
talk
about
these
topics
etc.
E
E
Some
sort
of
funding,
so
if
we
do
this,
then
we
get
funding.
If
we
don't
do
this,
then
we
don't
get
funding.
If
we
reach
out
to
some
external
organizations
and
if
we
get
sponsorship,
then
we
can
think
about
ethics,
so
that
must
not
be
so
anyways
again.
That
was
a
bit
too
much,
but
I
think
it's
super
super
important.
F
So
but
I
in
having
some
freeform
discussions
with
folks
in
the
omega
channel
I've
I've
found
ways
to
apply
some
of
this
higher
thinking,
so
I'm
trying
to
create
graphics
to
that
end,
but
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
I'm
still
doing
my
thing
over
here
and
still
thinking
about
it
a
lot
and
it
seems
like
we
have
a
little
a
little
consent
group
now
started,
there's
a
consent
channel
where
aloysius
and
myself-
and
I
think
gene
are
talking
about
this
stuff.
F
So
you
know,
hopefully
that
will
come
to
something.
It
just
takes
a
little
bit
of
time
and
I
haven't
had
space
to
think
about
that
as
deeply
as
I'd
like.
F
E
F
Seems
to
me
that
where,
where
the
work
between
gravity
and
omega
overlaps
is
is
consent,
do
you
know
what
I
mean
and
ethics.
A
F
A
F
D
F
You
know,
like
I
know
that
you
and
I
you
know,
resonate
with
that
fab
for
relate
stuff,
but
it
can
be
a
little
bit
challenging
you
know
to
get
through.
So
I'm
trying
to
make.
A
E
E
It
also
directly
applies
to
an
area
of
concern
that
we
have
not
gotten
to,
but
it's
obvious
ethics
of
experimentation
that
somehow
relates
to
enabling
informed
participation.
So,
for
example,
I
learned
that
many
people
don't
know
that
token
entering
commons
is
the
zeroth
iteration
of
common
stack.
So
you
know.
E
One
I
always
say
that
it's
not
a
tech
issue
or
common
stack
issue.
It's
a
typical
issue
of
this
decentralization
that
people
coming
from
their
you
know,
experience
expectations
and
so
on
and
their
connection
to
this
topic
and
expect
something.
Obviously
it's
just
one
one
slice
that
they
expect
and
connect
to
with
number
one.
This
thing
is
much
bigger
token
engineering
commons
is
forming.
It
is
an
experiment
in
and
on
itself
we
applied,
tested
and
built
the
first
cultural
build
around
an
augmented
bonding
curve.
E
So
I'm
talking
chinese
or
any
other
language
that
you're,
not
speaking,
if
you're
new
right.
So
how
do
we
get
people
to
understand?
All
of
that,
I
think
that's
definitely
communitas
like
us,
and
also
this
onboarding,
like
enable
informed
participation
and
what
nick
actually
just
to
end
that,
like
nick
literally
and
we
have
a
cartoon
of
it
on
our
on
our
mirror
board,
nick
literally
enabled
or
brought
that
you
know
this
inflatable
bridge
that
she
was
working
on
in
her
free
time.
E
That
literally,
is
needed
on
omega
in
token
during
comments
and
literally
any
other
community
I'm
contributing
to
and
again
it
relates
to
back
to
regenerative
workflows,
because
it
has
this,
you
know
what
energizes
you.
You
know.
Why
do
you
think
you're
here?
If
you
don't
know
yet,
that's
okay,
you
know.
So
it's
super
super
cool
and
I
think
the
two
of
you
at
the
earliest
and
also
manu,
of
course,
and
some
of
the
you
know,
working
group
leads
like
they.
E
They
used
to
join
omega,
but
the
calendars
are
feeling
more
and
more
so
it
is
actually
very
useful
and
very
important
work
and
that
when
we
see
overlaps
is
not
overlaps,
our
areas.
Overlaps
are
sources
of
abundance.
E
Literally
because
you
do
one
thing
you
exchange
with
others,
you
improve
it
in
many
many
ways
and
you
can
use
it
manifold.
That's
literally
a
positive
thumb
game,
so
number
one
pro
social
game,
design
principle
in
token
engineering.
E
So
I
definitely
see
those
too
and
look
at
this.
I
hope
it's
it's.
It
reflects
what
you
said
that
it's
inter-working
group
work,
omega
gravity,
consent.
F
E
F
F
A
F
You
know
along
the
top
and
then
but
once
we
arrive
somewhere,
then
we
have
to
make
sense
of
it
right.
So
there's
there's
for
me
when
the
when
I
get
to
this
part
portion,
where
there's
this
chaotic
change
right,
I
might
need
to
say
this
has
implications
for
other
groups
or
other
taos,
or
you
know
what
I
mean
so
that
we
can
then
document
and
process
how
we're
going
to
deal
with
that
side
of
it.
And
then
we
need
to
start
the
informed
consent
process
again
to
actually.
H
F
A
C
Yeah,
can
I
add
here
something
because
I
feel
there
are
more
speed
lovers
from
the
gravity
working
group,
because
they
were
in
principle
to
mediate
and
to
resolve
these
kind
of
communications
problems
within
developmental
organizations
and
with
other
doubts
and
do's
which
are
in
this
3d
movement.
So
I'm
seeing
in
my
personal
experience,
I'm
just
spilling
over
from
other
communities
which
came
to
gravity
or
the
expectations
gravity
were
putting
forward
in
the
space
trying
to
yeah
to
solve
their
complex
problems
or
their
complex
organizational
liaison.
C
That's
what
I'm
saying-
and
I
myself
I'm
involved
in
some
doubt
about
communication
for
complex
thinking,
for
I
guess,
gravity,
expectations
or
programs
or
yes,
the
quality
of
gravity.
So
this
would
be
like
down
to
the
work
group
or
ethical
implications
of
being
interactively
doing
this
consent,
but
also
yes,
practically
implementing
that
in
steps
right.
C
H
My
point
of
view
like
here
in
brussels,
my
question
towards,
like
the
token
engineering
commons
in
general
and
specific,
like
the
omega
group,
is
like,
is
I'm
dealing
with
the
project
which
is
called
like
residency
wild
cards.
H
So
is
it
interesting
from
your
point
of
view
to
actually
have
me
inviting
other
persons
that
might
be
interested,
but
that
are
mainly
working
with
performing
arts
or
visual
art.
Their
interest
is
probably
a
lot
about
how
it
links
to
the
traditional
economy
and
that's
also
a
bit.
What
is
about
like
how
it
can
go
from
this
kind
of
web
tree
flows
into
like
solidarity,
economies
which
are
fully
compatible
with
like
persons
that
have
like
no
knowledge
about
what
these
kind
of
crypto.
E
Think
for
that
group
really
the
not
not
the
group,
the
the
omega
working
group,
that
is
really
you
know
token.
Entering
ethics
ethos
embodying
wisdom
of
three,
like
literally
it
is.
This
group
should
also
challenge
like
the
token
engineering.
E
First-Timers
or
people
who've
been
here,
you
know
who've
been
trying
to
get
through
this
for
for
a
long
long
time,
but
that's
exactly
the
reason
why
nick
put
such
an
emphasis
of
on
onboarding
that
it's
really
open
to
everyone
who
is
interested
but
really
genuinely
interested.
E
But,
for
example,
in
this
case,
I
believe
the
token
entering
confidence
library,
this
living
library,
that
body
system
and
everything
that
we
have
in
mind
would
be
a
fantastic
door
opener.
It's
literally
like
what
the
library
does
in
in
a
community
or
in
in
a
city
right,
I
don't
know
like
and
and
especially
because
you
have
some
so
many
contributions
already
in
the
library,
and
you
have
also
just
this
idea
that
you
could
somehow
host
readings
or
or
what
have
you.
E
I
think
we're
going
to
ideate
on
that
a
lot
more
when
it
is
also
more
more
concrete.
All
the
time
comes
closer
that
how
could
we
host
these
consultants,
library
sessions
in
physical
and
especially
also
engineering,
far
places
who
likely
could
benefit
a
lot
from
learning
about
these?
These
web
three
of
learning
about
crypto
economics
and
so
on.
E
So
definitely
a
big
yes,
but
I
think-
and
maybe
even
you
know
next
year
in
a
sense
like
let's
go
through
this
working
group
process,
slash
creative
slash
energy
floor
and
let's
have
that
embedded
and
working
and
then
maybe
we
will
be
even
really
ready
to
to
host
anyone,
because
that's
that
is
that
is
yeah.
That
is
an
aspiration
right.
E
But
as
always,
I
say
this
topic
is
so
hard
to
onboard.
I
don't
know
software
engineers
and
data
scientists
into
you
know
even
for
them.
It's
super
super
complex,
but
if
you
get
go
through
this
one
by
one
and
we
have
the
library
that
can
be
more
open
and
more
interactive
and
more
accessible
in
terms
of
various
media
and
so
on,
I
think
it's
a
real
chance
to
see
that
aspiration
get
real.
B
Yeah
I
kind
of
wanted
to
to
go
into,
but
I
thought
you
know
my
my
idea
what's
this
forming
into
like
this
first
phase
of
this
game
to
help
guide
the
library,
so
the.
A
B
Self-Discovery
game
and
that
you
know
I
had
the
arbitrarily
the
three
flows
as
like
these
doorways
into
into
the
library
and
going
into
what
like
steph
was,
was
saying
he's
like
the
first?
Well,
it's
not
the
first,
but
it's
like
you
know.
I
kind
of
I
kind
of
view
it
as
like
in
the
beginning,
like
you
have
just
these,
these,
like
phrases
who
who
owns
like
token
engineering
ethics?
What's
the
value
of
transdiscipline,
what's
the
value
of
novelty
and
then.
B
Like
this,
the
token
engineering
like
basic
stuff
like
what
what
goes
on
in
token
engineering
what's
going
on
in
the
library
and
it
kind
of
like
helps,
guide
you
in
this
like
order
and
invites
you
to
like
you
know,
to
come
and
like
go,
go
through
the
the
community.
B
B
Groundwork,
research
that's
going
on
and
then,
like
the
creative
side,
is
more
abstract
and
it's
probably
like
the
the
different
like
videos,
different
sayings
that
come
up
and
that
becomes
like
yeah.
What
I'm
saying
arbitrarily
is
like
the
payoff
is
like
you
get
it
like
a
little
nft
of
our
gift
of
wisdom
and
but.
E
So
yeah
exactly,
I
think
these,
let
me
put
it
that
way:
onboarding
and
regenerative
workflow
research
we're
going
to
experiment,
whatever
research
we're
doing
really
hard
on
the
talking
engineering,
confidence,
library
and
whatever
insights
we
get
from
that.
What
is
working?
We
can
add
to
our
originative
workflow
research.
E
You
know
as
groundwork,
so
I'm
just
calling
it
a
creative
flow
and
energy
flow.
Just
for
us
to
have
some
nicknames.
E
Okay
capabilities
approach
contributes
to
so
that's
one
issue.
I
have
or
a
question
I
have
so
in
my
head.
The
capabilities
approach
was
mean
to
contribute
to
a
tv
ethics,
ethical
principles
that
we
have
already.
E
See
patient
okay,
this
con,
the
incentive
design
research,
definitely
contributes
to
token
drink.
It
takes
beware
of
social
engineering,
meaning
manipulation
or
being
manipulative.
E
Connects
consent
and,
and
all
these
nice
things,
so
this
is
where
I
see
yeah
and
capabilities
approach
manu
introduced
that
I
don't
know
how
many
of
you
were
there
already
like
that.
We
also
had
an
introduction
to
capabilities
approach
is
a
huge,
huge
undertaking
right,
but
definitely
that
speaks
to
that
capabilities
and
maybe
also
capacity
what
we
call
here.
C
E
It
will
ask
of
each
one
of
us
who
want
to
contribute
in
one
or
many
of
those
research
groundworks
like
what
is
our
commitment.
How
much
can
we
put?
E
It
could
be
that
your
day,
job
requires
this
of
you
and,
and
you
know,
you're,
you
know
applying
it,
meaning
you
could
make
use
of
it,
but
also
you
could
bring
insights
from
the
field
that
is
so
so
important
in
sense
from
the
field
how
this
research
actually
applies
to
token
economies
in
the
wild
organizations
that
are
trying
to
become
decentralized,
etc.
E
E
If
you
need
help
or
if
it
gets
too
much,
please
also
say
in
advance,
but
it
would
be
great
that
we
update
basically
that
part
of
the
omega
archibalagos,
which
just
has
this
t.
Ethics,
participatory
research.
H
E
E
We
have
done
this,
this
research
groundwork
and
underneath
the
research
groundwork
we
actually
have
the
regenerative,
workflow
and
so
on,
and
then
maybe
on
the
level
of
the
top
level,
a
description
of
omega
and
the
the
top
level
bubble
we
have,
inter
wiki
or
connection
to
other
groups
like
gravity
communities
and
underneath
thoughts.
We
have
the
people
contributing
and
and
the
topics
that
they
see
as
being
in
those
areas
and
with
that
basically,
we
would
be
able
to
update
the
manifesto
our
archipelagos,
the
working
group
proposal,
that
goes
into
advice
process.
E
Again.
This
will
be
something
we
will
roll
over
and
over
again.
As
you
see,
it's
not
easy,
or
it's
not
as
simple
or
short
thing,
but
we
will
work
this
through
so
that
you
know
everyone
who
joins
has
the
opportunity
to
continue
understanding
better
the
processes,
but
also
that
we
have
this
wonderful
documentation.
E
With
links
and
practical
tips,
what
can
go
wrong,
etc,
and
we
update
the
token
engineering
commons
handbook
with
our
website,
and
that
will
be
basically
that's
our
working
group
description.
F
Just
I
don't
know
if
you've
seen
these
recent
things
that
I've
made,
but
I
did
kind
of
it
seems
to
me
that
contextually
it
might
help
people
to
onboard
to
you
know
a
group
like
ours
with
a
lot
of
complexity.
F
If
you
had
something
where
you're
like
okay,
so
you've
showed
up
here,
but
we're
actually
because
we're
all
educated
in
these
ways
on
the
left
here,
we
I
it
seems
to
me
that
gravity
and
many
of
the
additional
groups
that
aren't
directly
related
to
the
creation
of
a
token
or
you
know
the
money
or
the
tech
side
of
this
is
mostly
about
doing
this
step
number
two
right,
where
we're
figuring
out
ways
to
break.
A
A
F
A
A
F
F
Fix
everything
or
whatever,
but
I
actually
think
that
we
should
sort
of
intentionally
break
them
up
and
the
reason
why
I
say
that
is
because
I
feel
like
there
is
kind
of
a
a
process
for
that
that
that
even
bitcoin
or
you
know
satoshi
himself,
you
know
would
be
understanding
and
I
think
you
know
we're
building
out
the
practical
philosophy.
E
Do
you
think,
like
the
step,
two,
this
bureaucracy,
it's
a
no
word.
A
E
So,
by
the
way,
I
think,
our
our
general
or
our
main
working
group
session,
I
think
for
the
topic
of
the
day
we're
done.
But
if
you
want
to
continue,
I
I
just
want
to
do
it
as
if
you
have
some
more
time,
because
I
wanted
to
get.
A
E
That
I
find
super
super
interesting
because
it's
true
obviously
you've
seen
you.
You
have
contextualized,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
the
token
engine
comments
that
this
cultural
build.
Are
you
you
weren't?
I
don't
know
if
you
were
in
the
very
in
the
very
very
beginning.
F
E
It
literally
introduced,
in
my
view,
step
two
and
the
biggest
issues
I
had
with
talking
in
token
and
dream
comments
or
the
way
it
is
the
way
it
is
and
or
it
is
applied
is
it
seemed
to
me
very,
very
bureaucratic
yeah,
but
it's
a
necessary
step,
as
you
say,
like
this
working
groups,
and
so
on.
E
You
know
my
position
was,
for
example,
to
say
this
is
like
how
any
political
party
and
working
groups
or
any
political
association
works.
This
is,
you
know,
is
this
it
and,
however,
you
need
to
build
out
infrastructure,
communication,
infrastructure,
the
processes
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
I'm
also
currently
seeing
the
an
alternative
to
how
that
could
work.
If
it's
not
bureaucracy,
it
is
the
benevolent
dictator
for
life,
because
you
you
need
this
accountability
and
typically
a
benevolent
dictator
for
life.
E
It's
an
open
source,
nickname
for
the
leader
or
of
an
open
source
organization.
Someone
who
has
you
know,
spread
their
hearts
out
for
that
before
even
people
got
got
there
got
into,
and
now
those
people
of
course
have
huge
respect
and
and
trust
and
division
of
this
person.
So
it's
the
benevolent
bdfl
and
that's
what
you
need
like
a
conductor
or
something
you
need
to
see
and
actually
align
yourself
with
or
say.
Okay,
this
is
division.
Is
this
division?
Okay,
am
I
aligned
with
this
version
or
not
so.
F
F
I'm
gonna,
you
know
what
I'm
saying,
because
they're
still
so
so
so
like
when
you
have
a
person
like
yourself
or
a
person
like
griff
or
person
like
livy
who've,
been
in
these
places
for
quite
some
time,
then
in
community,
organizing
they're
good
at
breaking
up
power
right,
but
they're
also
very
used
to
having
that
same
power.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
and
so.