►
Description
The 0mega Working Group examines the ethos of and ethics in token engineering as well as the shared vision and diversity of its communities.
We gather every two weeks on Wednesday at 8pm CET.
Steward: Sebnem
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Yeah
so
sister,
if
yeah,
I
actually
went
into
the
the
slide,
the
copy
of
governance,
moral
philosophy
and
right,
like
that's
something
that
was
really
really
just
from.
The
first
quote
that
we're
facing
philosophical
bankruptcy
was
just
so
piercing
and
so
incisive.
In
its
comment,
social
commentary,
which
I
I
think
it's
it's
one
of
the
things
that
that
that
we're
we're
lacking,
that
is
having
just
like
systemic
problems
across
the
cultural,
legal
and
economic
sphere
and
and
yeah.
B
A
Totally
so
this
is
today
we'll
we'll
start
through
through
it
together.
Okay,.
B
A
So,
but
that's
just
one
of
those
three
tracks,
I
believe
you
already
get
going
so
that
would
be
cool
how
we
can
settle.
The
content,
like
you
know,
a
short
description
of
these
sessions
and
then
basically
how
we
can
offer
really
schedule
and
then
in
advance,
communicate
and
reach
out
to
people
who
can
basically
benefit
from
it
right
and
reach
out
in
community.
A
B
I
know
I
know
for
a
fact
that
for
the
second
writing
training
next
week,
I'm
gonna
be
funko
was
kind
enough
to
lend
me
a
spot
in
the
training
and
I'm
gonna
be
presenting
on
the
psychology
of
human
leadership.
And
it
sounds
like
your
typical
convention
center
topic,
but
it's
it's
it.
B
I'm
really
gonna
make
it
so
practical
and
trying
to
like
look
behind
the
scenes
on
on
how
we
perceive
leadership
and
how
that
affects
the
leaders
that
we
choose
the
things
that
we
focus
on
et
cetera,
and
I
think
that's
it's
it's
entirely
within
the
the
last
part
of
the
iceberg.
C
B
Yeah
the
mental
models
so
I'd.
I
like
to
volunteer
later
on
some
session
to
present
on
yeah
on
on
on
there's
two
mental
models.
This
one,
the
one
that
I'm
going
to
be
adapting
and
presenting
and
towards
conflict
management
on
on
the
gravity
train
next.
B
Meta
thinking
and
and
yeah
I'd,
maybe
that's
why
I
found
it
so
useful
because
it's
something
I'm
already
researching,
working
on
and
and
yeah
so
that
that's
something
for
for
later
on,
but
I
can
contribute
with
with
the
mental
models.
I've
I've
some
some
other
things,
that
I've
come
from
books
on
our
mental
models
and
I
like
to
to
share
that
with
the
community.
A
E
A
The
the
whole
ai
ethics
goes
back
to
you
know,
I'm
just
saying
it's
not
something
token
engineering
related
restricted,
knowing
that
our
field
is
quite
interdisciplinary
transdisciplinary,
anyways,
but
it's
really
something
that
is
in
embedded
in
everything
we
do.
Every
tool
technology
we
create
technology
is
not.
A
Ideology,
free
in
a
sense
that
we
wish
it
did.
But
it's
not
you
start,
you
see
it
with
these
algorithms
that
you
know
learn
things
from
the
data,
but
the
data
is
curated
and
fed
into
those
algorithms
by
some
people,
and
even
if
they
just
you
know,
don't
see
it.
A
They
have,
for
example,
created
set
data
sets
with
biases
into
them
right
and
it's
very
simple
or
easier
to
see
now,
but
in
token
engineering
I
think
that
was
the
from
the
very
start
when
you
realize
you
have
this
new
power
of
embedded
thing
really
programmable
values
into
an
infrastructure.
This
is
when
you
realize.
Oh
do
I
know
what
I'm
doing
for
sure
and
that's
basically
one
thing
to
go
to
those
mental
models.
B
I'll,
just
I'll
just
say
that
it's
it's
very
interesting.
What
what
you
said
these
some
authors
describe
it
as
weapons
of
math
destruction,
wmd's
mass
destruction,
because
they
are
invisible,
monsters,
right
and-
and
I
bet
that
when
we
when
we
first
shifted
from
nomads
to
being
sedentary
and
building
communities
around
agriculture
and
livestock.
B
I
bet
that
we
did
not.
We,
we
wouldn't
like
just
snakes,
running
around
our
zone
where
he
was
starting
to
become
civilized,
but
right
now,
because
we
have
invisible,
snakes
and
monsters
and
wolves
of
different
scope,
they're
silent
weapons
and
most
of
the
world
that
has
not
seen
or
beyond
unbanked,
and
the
people
who
who
make
really
the
ball,
really
not
odds
that
we've
been
fortunate
enough
to
receive
the
opportunity
that
we
have,
but
really
the
bulk
of
the
world.
B
They
haven't
even
really
like
being
empowered
by
web
2
and
now
we're
bringing
web
3
and
they're
like
wait
what's
web.
So
we
have
this
monumental
pass
before
us
like
educating
and
evangelizing
and
pulling
back
the
curtain
on
a
lot
of
these
things,
the
mental
models
again
and
it's
mental
models,
it's
physical,
mental
models
and
it's
it's
it's
a
digital
mental
model.
You
know
like
algorithmic
mental
models
and
then
there's
like
derivatives
in
the
political
economy
behind
them,
it's
so
complicated
right
now
I
mean
it's.
A
And
roberto
basically
joined,
I
think
today.
Maybe
you
can
also
share
it
a
little
bit
because
I
believe
it
touches,
or
at
least
the
worldview
part
touches
a
little
bit
it's
so
complex,
but
we
also
want
to
have
progress
right.
We
don't
want
to
be
paralyzed
by
by
analyzing
all
of
the
aspects,
because
it's
just
not
going
to
get
any
simpler.
Just
by
analyzing.
B
Although
the
the
kinetic
framework
that
we're
gonna
share
with
us
several
times,
I
think
that's
that
goes
into.
A
That's
also
super
helpful,
just
one
more
for
for
the
others,
basically,
that
we
understand
that
these
are
the
planes
different
planes
and
when
we
have
something
working
you
know
we
went
from
the
chaotic,
complex,
complicated,
modeled
and
simulated
and
got
it
into
automation
and
into
simple.
A
You
know
a
simple
bonding
curve
that
will
work
and
it
might
work
for
that
situation
that
we
managed
to
simplify
without
truncating,
but
these
planes
are
all
always
moving
and
as
soon
as
we
are
on
on
on
different
terms,
those
simple
rules
that
we
have
embedded
might
not
work
anymore.
So
that's
going
to
be
one
session.
I
highly
recomme
all
of
us
highly
recommend
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
definitely
so
and
today
really
yeah.
So
that's
basically
where
we
were
coming
from
right.
A
Just
you
know,
seeing
quantifying
events
and
saying,
okay,
we
just
need
to
create
the
right
rewards.
So
those
events
change
by
changing
the
behaviors
of
people.
This
is
the
the
leverage
point
that
we
are
working
off
from,
but
it
would
be
much
more
effective
if
we
started
you
know
the
deeper.
We
go,
the
higher
the
mental
models.
So
if
you
can
make
the
system
structures
visible,
then
people
will
be
better
able
to
change
their
behaviors,
not
just
by
being
rewarded.
A
You
know,
and
not
like
the
social
scoring
systems
that
I
I
truly
and
I
think
most
of
us,
you
know,
dread
and
wouldn't
want
token
economies
to
to
be,
but
really
even
going
further
helping
people
to
check
their
mental
models
when
they
make
decisions,
design
decisions,
but
also
decisions
and
participating.
A
You
know
people
just
voting
their
gut
feeling,
but
also
knowing
why
right
and
challenging
how
people
or
communities
together
to
to
not
challenge
for
the
sake
of
challenging,
but
just
be
aware
that
in
a
group
in
a
global
community,
especially
as
diverse
as
as
ours,
these
different
belief
systems
are
valuable
right,
but
still
for
common
action.
A
A
Let
me
put
it
that
way
that
pushing
the
envelope
that
we
really
need
participants
to
become
self-sovereign
individuals,
be
able
to
make
the
right
decisions
and
be
knowing
that
that
rights
will
adapt,
because
the
system
changes,
etc,
but
still
keeping
the
ability
to
form
consensus
in
the
true
meaning
of
the
word
is
feeling
together
right.
A
Who
strive
to
understand
first,
before
being
understood,
you
know
curious
enough
or
capable
enough
also
to
communicate
in
this
community.
These
are
the
things
that
will
be
true
game,
changers
and
yeah.
I'm
coming
to
understand
that
you
know,
I
think,
the
that
what
can
be
embedded
in
a
smart
contract
on
a
global
ledger
will
be
very
simple
to
help
us
by
interacting
with
it,
to
you
know,
show
our
preferences
or
our
beliefs,
but
also
see
others
and
really
help
people
to
coordinate
better,
not
making
decisions
for
them
better.
A
You
know,
so
I
think
this
whole
reasoning
part
will
and
shall
be
human
because
yeah,
because
we
are
bringing
what
it
is.
A
That
makes
these
systems
qualitatively
different,
and
that's
basically,
when
I
say
coming
from
first
principles:
it's
really
about
the
all
of
the
qualitative
aspects
of
human
coordination,
right
that,
if
you
just
took
it
to
in
data
driven
algorithms
and
optimization
where
I
come
from,
we
would
not
have
that
quality
of
the
system,
but
that
requires
really
us
humans
to
be
able
to
communicate
across
different
worldviews,
identify
you
know
these
different
modes
of
reasoning,
and
I
think,
with
these
decision
frameworks,
we're
opening
up
to
just
you
know,
opening
up
to
see
that
these
frameworks
are
helping,
that
we
can
use
multiple,
etc
and
that
we
have
this
goal
to
reach
a
common
understanding
common
language,
a
common
guiding
principle,
knowing
that
those
principles,
especially
the
organizational
ones
must
change,
must
be
adapted,
because
this
is
a
complex
adaptive
system.
A
So
and
with
that,
basically,
these
are
you
know
that
this?
What
I
would
love
to
make
into
something
that
is
more
like
a
game
like
more
interactive.
So
that
would
be
that's
why
it
would
be
great
if
you
try
to
apply
understand
what
it
might
mean
or
what
it
means
to
you
when,
when
we
go
through
this
now
and
also
really
just
play
back,
you
know
without
hesitation.
A
There
is
definitely
no
right
or
wrong,
or
am
I
doing
this
right?
It's
really
about
testing
whether
this
is
helping
us
to
see
different
worldviews
when
we're
thinking
about
making
a
decision-making,
a
design
of
a
token
economy
and
one
one
thing
we
could
do
unless
you
want
to
bring
something
else.
A
Is
you
can
take
the
example
that
that
sean
wrought
in
our
first
focus
group,
so
we
had
a
focus
group
with
many
practicing
token
engineers
and
participants
of
of
token
economies,
but
most
people
who
really
make
those
decisions
and
implement
or
are
there
as
token
engineers
in
a
project
and
one
one
of
such
story?
Was
you
know
of
this.
A
Project
where
the
the
participants
of
this
token
economy
or
those
who
want
to
design
it
actually
designed,
for
you
know,
making
the
preserving
preservation
of
forest
pay
off
such
that
people
decide
to
actually
not
cut
off
old
trees
that
you
know
will
require
decades
to
grow
back,
but
also
currently
really
capture
multitudes
of
co2
compared
to
other
sorts
of
trees.
So
it's
a
special
forest.
A
You
know
when
you
come
from
the
side,
it's
very
clear.
You
know
don't
cut
them,
but
on
the
other
side,
people
who
live
there
also
live
from
the
revenues
of
logging
and
also
there
is
a
whole
industry
behind
with
lobbies
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
all
of
that
worlds
existing
world
views
right
that
an
industry
that
is
profitable,
you
know,
must
be
protected
at
all
costs.
And
now
there
is
this
new
group
coming
in.
But
basically
you
know
this
token
engineer
felt
that.
A
They
were
not
100
sure
that
it's
either
right
or
wrong.
You
know
people
who
live
there
require
revenues.
This
old
system
is
very
hard
to
to
just
get
rid
of.
How
do
you
incentivize
for
or
against
something
without
knowing
what
is
100
percent
desired
or
good?
A
A
Then
we
would
go
through
these
world
views
when
we
take
this
example.
In
the
back
of
our
hand,
head
and.
E
E
This
take
that
again,
we,
as
you
said,
we
are
incorporating
our
ideologies
and
our
assumptions
in
any
system
we
we
encounter,
and
in
this
regard
we
we
are
seeing
like
this
tokenized
economy
is
being
applied
to
many
many
ecological
transition
projects,
and
this
is
something
that
is
affecting
like
the
whole
world,
and
sometimes
we
are
here
and
we
we
are
in
our
group,
saying:
okay,
yes,
let's,
let's
focus
on
use
cases-
and
this
is
one
of
the
main
use
cases
that
are
right
now
being
applied
for
nfts
and
then
you
you
are
speaking
out
canada
and
you
say:
okay.
E
This
is
fantastic.
If
in
canada
they
don't
get
the
oak
trees,
that
would
be
fantastic
for
reducing
carbon
emissions.
But
then
you
you,
you
start
thinking,
okay,
this
is
happening
in
canada
and
this
is
worldwide
view
or
trying
to
conserve
nature.
And
do
you
want
to
use
more
renewable
energies,
but
then
you,
you
see
right
now
in
canada
and
the
u.s,
the
electricity
prices
and
the
index
prices
are
fairly
normal
in
comparison
with
what
they
have
been
in
the
last
five
years.
E
So
to
speak
money
you
come
to
europe
and
you
say:
okay,
let's
make
the
same
advances
in
an
ecological
transition,
but
then
you
have
germany
and
you
are
super
used
to
to
work
for
this
transition
economy
for
electricity,
and
you
know
in
western
europe
right
now
the
the
electricity
prices
are
rising
like
hugely,
and
then
you
see,
maybe
electricity
and
gas.
Energy
is
right
now
possible
in
the
us
and
in
canada,
but
it
is
not
feasible
for
europe,
so,
for
example,
this
is
like
a
huge
right
now
in
the
markets.
A
So
I
like.
Actually
I
think
electricity
is
a
bit
more
controversial,
because
maybe
we
should
take
that
because,
for
example,
you
know,
I
always
say
decentralized,
solar
and
storage,
but
then
when
people
tell
me
that
but
lithium
getting
lithium
out
of
the
ground,
it's
not
that
clean
and
people
lose
their.
You
know
there's
another
problem
with
the
resource
scarcity
of
lithium
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
may
I'm
just
making
a
note
that
that
might
be
a
better
more
controversial
example.
E
In
the
supply
economy
supply,
so
any
change
in
one
of
these
supply
and
demand
markets
is
one
of
the
other.
So
we
cannot
say
this
like.
This
is
the
primordial.
This
is
the
best
use
case,
because
then
you
want
to
impact
all
the
other,
all
the
other
markets,
so
we-
and
this
is
not
something
that
as
an
analyst
or
a
developer,
you
you
first,
you
know
like
okay,
my
whole
tokenized
system
is
gonna
impact,
the
other
point
of
the
world
economy,
but
this
happens.
A
So
then,
basically
we
when
we
have
such
a
scenario,
I
think
which
we
should
have
this,
maybe
like
an
origin
story
and
then
ask
you,
know
these
these
four
poor
questions
right.
You
know
why.
Why
does
this
tokenized
economy
ecosystem
needs
to
exist
or
how
it
will
come
into
existence.
A
That's
a
nice
question
because
it
goes
down
to
your
your
or
to
participants,
belief.
Some
of
them
will
say,
because
there
is
no
other
option.
Some
of
them
say
because
you
know
other
people
want
to
make
money
right.
The
second
one
is
the
unfolding
pattern
like:
what
do
you
think
this
transition,
or
this
token
economy
will
evolve
when
you
put
it
once
you
put
it
in
place?
A
Or
the
mapping,
when
you
have
done
it
like
this,
the
participants
of
the
token
economy,
the
the
rough
value
exchange,
why
the
token
economy
exists
and
the
initial
rules
you
might
have
set
in
place?
Where
will
it
evolve
to
and
the
the
fourth
one
is
actually
the
the
most
important
one,
and
this
leads
back
to.
Actually,
you
know
questioning
all
of
the
three
before
you
know
what
makes
these
justified
beliefs
justified?
A
Is
it
just
you
know
the
founders
who
believe
in
the
system
or
have
they
gone
through?
You
know
a
collaborative
process
where
those
beliefs
actually
have
been
incorporated
or
have
been
collectively
worked
through
and
hence
true,
consensus
believed
to
be
justified
or
believed
to
be
holding
true
for
the
system.
A
D
I
just
wanted
to
know
if
we
have
access
to
that
document.
I
I
really
yeah.
A
You
can
also
share
the
original,
the
bigger
one
that
has
more
context
but
yeah
I'll
share
it
again.
F
Yeah,
this
is
really
cool
and
yeah.
I
think
a
lot
of
this
I've
seen
similar
things
with
the
kind
of
like
when
doing
systems,
thinking
or
kind
of
like
going
deeper
into
into
that
and
how
how
important,
yeah
the
mental
models
are
right
for
the
yeah,
for
the
structuring
and
for
the
really
understanding
of
how
complex
systems
work
right.
So
I
guess
one
one
thing
that
I
that
I
wonder
right
is
the
in
terms
of
the
application
of
of
these
ideas.
F
Right
like
I
was
mentioning
in
that
in
that
chat
right
or
in
that
comment
that
I'm
I'm
I'm
in
touch
with
several
dolls,
and
I
think
that
there's
different
flavors
of
dao,
so
the
infant
model,
I
think
definitely
we
need
something
like
that
for
daos.
F
I
think,
because
they're
so
so,
broad
now,
right
and
and
what's
what's
interesting
to
me-
is
that
I'm
seeing
a
bit
of
a
repeat
of
2017
right
when
the
icos
were
the
craze
right
and
everyone
was
like
yeah,
you
know
throw
stuff
off
the
wall,
we'll
see
what
stinks
it
doesn't
matter.
If
we
break
it,
let's
just
move
fast
right
and
yeah
right,
which
is
cool.
I
I
like
I
like
the
spirit
of
that
right,
but
and
I'll
get
back
to
the
mental
models
in
one.
F
Second,
just
want
to
give
the
context
go
ahead,
please
so
so
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
noticing
is
that
just
awareness
about
what
mental
models
people
are
using
is
is
completely
lacking
right
in
a
lot
of
these.
Yes,
in
a
lot
of
these
conversations
and
in
a
lot
of
these
dials,
so
I'm
wondering
if
a
low-hanging
fruit
is
to
actually
have
I
mean
it's
kind
of
like
cliche
or
a
little.
You
know
I
don't
know
how
cringy,
but
you
know
hey
five
things
that
you
should
ask
yourself
before.
F
F
As
you
were
talking,
I
was
thinking
about
how.
How
would
we
be
able
to
apply
this
quickly,
because
I
do
think
that
there's
there's
a
there's
low
hanging
fruit
here.
I
think
that
the
level
of
depth
that
we're
in
right
now
is
like
you
know,
even
but
not
here.
The
attention
would
already
be
kind
of
like
would
give
people
a
little
positive
to
think
that
more
about
what
they're
doing.
A
So
I
agree
with
you
totally,
even
even
the
wordings
etc.
Maybe
maybe,
instead
of
explaining
the
model
or
framework
like
this,
is
the
question
a
make
it
really
accessible.
What
am
I
asking
myself
in
these
four
and
and
then,
as
you
say,
maybe
our
first
goal
is
really
just
awareness
raising
and
saying.
If
you
want,
you
know,
if
you
got
goosebumps
and
and
you
realize
the
the
power
of
mental
models
and
that
you
know
you
want
to
gain
more,
then
you
know
we
can
go
deeper
into
that
direction
whereby
I
must
say
really.
A
Fabian
used
to
you
know.
I
I
think
that
was
when
world
views
go
past
each
other
without
making
the
noise.
I'm
like
you,
don't
realize
how
how
far
back
I
am.
You
know.
I
come
you
this
industrial
world,
where
everything
is
automated.
You
make
a
decision,
you
know
decision
tree
and
you
know
the
world
will
sort
itself.
According
to
your
decision
tree,
that's
the
mindset,
you
know
we're
trying
to
actually
just
put
the
little
crack
in
it,
so
the
rest
will
come
yeah.
C
I
do
want
to
say
that
to
this
end,
I
feel
like
there
is
a
we
need
to
kind
of
develop
a
pedagogy
of
increasing
complexity,
tolerance
in
people
yes,
and.
F
C
And
so
I
do
wonder
if
we
can,
you
know
maybe
think
about
a
process
by
which
that
can
happen,
and
I
do
find
that
people
engage
with
the
gravity
work
a
lot
because
it
goes
to
the
emotional
part
of
themselves.
You
know,
and
so
so
like
I
often
describe
spiral,
dynamics
and
integral
theory,
both
of
which.
C
A
C
And
I
think
if
you
did
it
in
the
other
way
around
you
wouldn't
not,
you
would
not
necessarily
get
the
same
kind
of
message
and
it
might
not
motivate
you
as
much
so
perhaps
we
can
just
consider
as
a
group
different
ways
in
which
to
you
know.
A
You
do
you
have
a
schedule
of
you,
know,
past
or
ongoing
sessions
or
in
gravity
that
you
gave
like
those
those
courses.
Do
we
have
a
calendar
of
those.
A
D
But
for
for
the
past
ones,
I
think,
like
the
the
all
the
videos
are
in
in
youtube
until
yesterday's
session
and
yeah,
we
have
a
link
that
to
the
to
the
graviton
training
calls
to
the
calendar.
A
Yeah
definitely
so
we
should
definitely
link
those
because
it
really
goes
hand
in
hand.
You
know
the
seeing,
but
then
the
next
question
is
okay.
I
grasped
it,
but
I'm
lacking
the
capability
to
communicate
language
communication.
That's
a
whole
different
level.
You
know
ability
to
find
the
right
word.
So
that's
why
I
really
would
love
to
you
know,
get
people
here.
You
know
from
the
mechanistic
view.
There
is
more,
and
this
is
why
you
know
and
then
get
this
crack.
Have
them.
A
E
I
think
you
are
identifying
like
what
is
the
problem
of
methodology,
and
it
is
not
something
like
primordial
or
in
the
base
of
what
we
are
like
talking
in
this
world.
So
you
you
think
you
we
lack
like
a
mannequinistic
way
to
be
able
to
express
what
we
have
been
gathering
in
this
kind
of
sessions
and
to
be
able
to
communicate
this
to
people.
But
then
I
just
connecting
to
what
the
regatta
said
like
the
pedagogy.
E
Sometimes
sometimes
people
don't
need
to
to
have
like
these
compressed
words
coming
from
the
same
people
or
the
same
mouse,
because
the
same
mods
are
bias
or
complicits
of
of
the
world
views
they
they
put
into
the
table
right.
So
I
think
your
linguistics
thing
or
your
communication
or
make
a
mistake
approach.
You
think
you
lack,
which
is
possibly
your
world
view
or
something
you
are
considering
from
your
eye
to
your
interior
right.
E
If
I'm
correct,
I
don't
want
to
be
like
being
very
psychological
here
in
into
the
world
views
of
everyone,
because
this
is
the
the
value
maybe
of
this
group
to
be
able
to
to
gather
all
the
differences.
All
the
all
the
different
yeah
ways
of
being
right,
because
what
we
are
doing
here
is
is
being
in
this
a
communal
space,
but
I
guess
for
being
practical.
A
What
I
would
love
is
if
we
came
to
really
this
dialogue
or
monologue.
A
If
we
could
offer
this
such
that
people
actually
come
and
let's
try
it,
and
you
know
there
is
the
situation,
you
know,
okay,
the
situation
where
you
have
to
decide
how
you
want
to
incentivize
this.
You
know
sustainability
project
that
you
know.
A
I
think
it
needs
that
there
needs
to
be
a
situation
described
so
that
you
know
an
example
situation
clear
enough
that
people
can
wrap
their
heads
around.
What
is
the
dilemma?
What
is
it
that
one
cannot
100
percent
say
this
is
how
we
should
be
doing
it
and
what
I
would
love
to
do
and
I
think
it
could
work,
but
really
this
situation
when
people
you
know,
spend
five
minutes
with
the
situation.
A
You
know
many
sides
and
there
are
the
people
who
want
to
cut
the
trees
they're
the
people
who
live
there,
who
are
conflicted,
who
need
the
money
and
the
trees
and
they're
the
people
who
want
to
save
the
trees
at
all
costs,
but
might
not
be
into
the
people
who
live
there.
You
know
might
not
know
their
position
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
and
then
basically
really
have
this
group
where
people
are
invited
to
just
take
on
one
world
view
and
really
like
a
role
or
like
in
a
debating
class.
A
If
you
will
right
to
explain
or
to
explain
what
the
token
economy
should
reward
and
why
and
why.
It
is
important
from
this
from
these
different
worldviews.
A
You
know
saying
we
don't
know
right
what
is
the
perfect
incentivization
of
how
many
of
those
trees
should
stay
and
how
many
cuts,
but
people
want
to
start
already
with
with
an
experiment,
so
we're
just
going
to
define
the
process
and
we'll
adjust
this
process,
the
more
information
we
have,
because
we
cannot
know
it
from
the
start.
A
F
I
can
take
it
right.
Yes,
please
yeah,
so
I
guess
you
know
if
I
were
to
argue
that
I
would
say
that
the
trying
to
like
the
the
concept
of
value
capture
right
and
all
the
the
externalities
and
then
the
intrinsic
you
know
subjective
measures
of
of
what's
valuable
and
how
much
something
is
valuable
right
that
that
that's
theoretically
a
good
idea
and
then
we
should
strive
for
that.
F
But
the
reality
is
that
the
when
we're
thinking
about
I
mean,
even
if
we
look
at
our
current
economy
right,
everything
is
reduced
to
money.
Right
and
money
represents
multiple
choices,
that
people
are
subjectively
and
implicitly
making
about
value
right,
but
we
all
can
agree
on
and
that's
really
the
the
protocol
right
that
allows
us
to
exchange
things.
A
Does
anyone
want
to
take
another
another
stab
at
or
what
we
could
also
do?
We
have
couple
of
more
minutes
just
to
get
a
feel,
and
I
really
crave
for
feedback.
A
F
A
Oh
no,
no,
like
yeah
right
now,
I'm
just
trying
to
basically
get
an
idea
of
if
we
can
make
this
more
more
interactive
like
when
we
have
the
session
with
multiple
people
or
how
we
could
make
this
more
interactive.
F
A
F
I'm
gonna
copy
it
here,
so
it's
a
really
cool
meeting
space.
B
Isn't
it
isn't
it
one
that
has
like
a
game
world
yeah,
it's
kind
of
like
yeah.
F
Yeah
so
I
I
see
a
lot
of
meetings
are
taking
place
now
and
then,
when
you
come,
when
your
avatar
come
close
comes
close
to
other
avatars,
then
the
the
video
screens
pop
up
right.
So
if,
if
we
wanted
to
to
have
something
where
people
kind
of
like
split
into
groups-
and
they
have
their
own
kind
of
like
points
to
argue
right,
there
could
be
something
that
is
as
a
group
like
everyone
listening
in
it.
C
A
Or
basically,
not
competition,
but
you
know
in
in
one
group:
you
you,
you
are
in
this
command
and
control
world.
C
A
Everything
you
see
is,
you
know,
I
think
the
explanations
again
needs
needs
definitely
more
accessibility,
yeah,
but
let's
say
we
have
three
different
worlds
and
if
you
enter
them,
you
see
only
from
this
perspective
only
that
this
value
set
right.
Maybe
when
people
can
work
out
the
value
set
and
then
after
I
don't
know,
10
15
minutes,
we
gather
together
and
then
we
have
people.
You
know
the
possibilities,
the
command
and
control
people
and
the
logical,
positive
wisdom.
A
C
Because
I
I
see
in
a
few
of
those
things
that
some
of
the
action
modes
from
connection
would
be
appropriate
in
that
right.
So
you
know.
F
C
Right
so
I
could
kind
of
read
into
those
different
world
views.
You
know
bits
from
this
too
right
so.
A
Yeah
but
but
I
see
immediately
or
like,
for
example,
those
people
who
who
measure
who
are
used
measuring
and
they
might
insist
on
best
practices
that
they
have
already
you
know
and
those
who
say:
okay,
we
can't
know
everything
up
front,
they
would
say
no
not
best
practices.
Please
not
that's
going
to.
You
know,
throw
us
into
chaos.
A
We
need
to
do
it
like
this,
but
then
those
people
right
now
they
need
to
talk
and
and
find
the
common
common
point
and
there's
something.
A
Actually
we
had
in
one
of
those
session
on
one
of
the
past
sessions,
where
we
looked
at
the
omega
working
group,
science
that
marco
did-
and
it
actually
is
quite
helpful
that
we
say:
okay,
you
have
one
world
view
you
know
and
the
other
one
might
be
diametrically
opposing
it
right,
but
there
is
a
common
if
you
can
still
find
this
common
ground
or
this
grain
of
truth
here
right,
then,
basically,
you
can
simplify
all
of
the
rest.
A
C
We
then
create
a
model
to
go
across
the
line
between
the
complicated
and
the
simple,
and
then
you
end
up
with
the
best
practice.
So
it
could
be
that
we
actually
need
to
include
all
of
those
things
or
if
things
have
just
gone
horribly
wrong,
we
might
need
to
start
in
the
chaotic
and
resolve
the
thing
and
then
get
into
complex
and
complicated
and
then
get
to
simple.
Do
you
know
what
I
mean?
So
that's
my
way.
A
F
Sorry
I
do
have
to
drop
in
in
a
second
one,
one
quick,
sorry
to
interrupt
one
quick
thought
when,
when
it
comes
to
actually
bringing
people
together
to
kind
of
like
talk
about
this,
I
I'm
so
I'm
I'm
more
on
the
application
side
right.
F
So
I
definitely
want
to
dig
in
deep
and
understand
the
complexity
and
that's
you
know,
and
I've
been
involved
in
all
sorts
of
kind
of
like
deeper
things
right,
but
I
think
that
what
really
galvanizes
the
conversation
and
interest
is
to
have
a
very
specific
thing
to
discuss
right
so
not
have
it
be
attract,
but
actually
have
something
like
okay
xyz,
and
this
is
an
example
that
actually
based
on
the.
C
F
F
So
having
kind
of
like
framing
it
in
the
context
of
a
specific
example,
I
think
would
be,
would
enable
people
to
embody
the
position
better
because
when
you
start
with
a
high
level
kind
of
like
very
abstract
position,
right,
there's
so
many
different
angles
that
you
can
take
on
that
position
that
even
the
language
in
the
way
of
you
know,
you
may
actually
be
saying
the
same
thing
it's
just
like
you're
using
language
is,
is
the
problem
right.
So.
A
Yeah
yeah
definitely
going
for
for
for
a
special
or
easy
case
on
which
we
we
apply.
Those
and
also.
F
E
Can
I
please
follow
up
on
that
idea
because
we,
yes,
we
are
close
into
the
column
in
a
few
minutes
and
I
think
that's
what
the
methodology
approach
and
the
kinetic
approach
we're
trying
to
solve
like
we.
We
started
here
with
this
integral
theory
that
is,
of
course,
high,
very,
very
high
models
to
understand
reality
and
then
the
I
think,
the
practicality
or
the
reson.
E
Detroit
of
this
group
is
to
to
try
to
apply
this
from
a
methodological
point
of
view
like
having
these
playbooks
on
this
gamify
framework
for
not
only
token
engineers
but
any
developer,
any
creator,
any
artist,
any
thinker
that
comes
here.
So
I
think,
like
this
suggestion,
you
are
making
to
have
something
more
specific
and
more
approachable
for
people
to
be
engaged
is
what
we
are
trying
to
to
galvanize.
C
E
But
I
don't
think
that's
about
having
the
integrated
interaction
into
the
group
and
in
the
weather
ecosystem.
I
think
all
the
doubts
are
discussing
this
right
now
and
I
don't
know
if
there
is
going
to
be
like
a
holy
grail
for
everything,
but
maybe
we
can
strive
for
making
these
specific
avenues,
and
I
guess
this
is
like
the
bridges
drug
address
is
taken
from
the
simple
tree
complicated.
But
it's
not
that
simple.
E
Into
the
gamified
suggestion
we
are
making
for
for
the
for
next
session,
yeah.
F
C
A
Or
maybe
I
just
write
it
in
the
in
the
summary
not
to
take
too
much
of
your
time
and
while
I'm
thinking
while
I'm
talking,
but
I
believe
these
sessions
that
play
well
into
each
other
and
this
one
worldviews
game
could
be
really.
You
know
interaction,
but
just
to
make
the
interaction
easier
could
be
tied
to
to
a
a
story.
A
A
Maybe
that's
even
you
know,
seeing
those
differences
might
might
even
galvanize
people
just
to
see
that
there
is
a
playground
that
can
be
had,
and
you
know,
decision
making
or
life
doesn't
need
to
be
the
drama
of
decision
making
unfolding
so
yeah.
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
for,
for
sharing
you.