►
From YouTube: W46 0mega WG: Initiatives Updates
Description
The 0mega Working Group examines the ethos of and ethics in token engineering as well as the shared vision and diversity of its communities.
We gather every week on Wednesday at 8pm CET.
Steward: Sebnem
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
So
lydia
is
supposed
to
well.
Lydia
is
my
girlfriend.
She
asked
me
to
join
today
because
I
would
like
to
yeah:
do
the
the
research
she
is
doing
in
as
part
of
her
traineeship
I'd
like
to
contribute
to
that,
and
also.
B
So
the
tec
is
part
of
my
case
study
on
the
common
stack
and
yeah.
I
want
to
use
that
to
also
gather
some
data
and
yeah
fill
in
some
blanks.
C
That's
great,
can
you
please
give
us
yes
gathering
of
the
association
and
what
it
emerges
there,
because
we're
just
speaking
about
this
new
regeneration
or
regenerative
trend?
Do
you
think
that's
a
trend,
because
I
think
you
were
focusing
on
that
as
well.
Can
you
give
us
your
opinion
on
that
or
what
you
saw
in
the
gathering.
B
Yes
sure
in
the
in
the
refi
unconference
we
we
just
had
last
month
in
the
beginning
of
may
so
to
me.
Refi
is
in
the
end
just
another,
mostly
another
name
or
another
hashtag
for
well
cryptocommons
in
a
way
for
blockchain
for
good,
progressive
crypto,
and
you
know
it,
it
reverberates
very
much
all
these
ideas.
It's,
though,
a
more
less
abstract
notion,
because
it
has
this
attachment
to
nature
in
a
way.
B
Well,
interesting
and
all
and
fun,
but
it
also
brought
about
that.
There
were
a
lot
of
questions,
a
lot
of
criticism
with
more
straightforward
tokenization
of
nature
and
focus
on
carbon
credits.
To
some
degree,
there
was
a
lot
of
focus
on
language,
or
rather
on
on
how
terms
in
refi
same
as
in
crypto
overall
are
used
misleadingly.
B
For
example,
the
notion
of
a
reserve
for
klima
for
klima
dao
would
make
you
assume
that
this
reserve
can
really
back
the
token
as
in
it
can
be
sold
to
raise
the
price
of
a
token.
But
that
was
not
the
case,
so
this
reserve
does
actually
not
hold
up
to
price
and
under
many
other
examples
that
were
conversations
that
we
had
around
imprecise
wording.
B
But
you
know
overall,
it
was.
It
was
a
very
interesting
gathering
and
it
was
great
to
see
to
see
again
a
group
of
people
forming
and
staying
in
contact
after
so
we
we
just
recently
had
our
first
decompression
call
after,
and
it
was
great
to
see
how
many
people
are
are
well
on
fire
in
a
way
to
to
get
something
done
together.
A
B
A
Yeah
and
yeah
by
the
way
was
was
then
the
first
person
felix
said:
okay,
actually
lydia's.
You
know
I
never
get
it
right,
but
yeah,
anthropologist
and
peace
studies,
or
you
know
really
into
the
topics
also
that
are
in
working
with
gravity
like
conflict
and
so
on,
and
she
is,
you
know,
one
of
those
researchers
that
I
would
love
to
have
accompanying
whatever
it
is
we're
doing
here,
where
we're
figuring
out
and
why
you
know
now
that
we
have
really
an
omega
this
transdisciplinarity.
A
That
includes
arts
and
science,
which
is
really
big.
In
my,
in
my
view,
I
see
it
only
in
other
areas.
The
curve
lapse,
that
I
see
it,
that
this
is
happening
and,
of
course,
dada
like
the
artist
community,
is
actually
owning
the
owning
tag
or
owning
up
to
the
technological
freedoms
that
are
available
and
yeah.
A
I
just
feel
like.
We
need
more
support
on
the
sense
making
side
from
people
who
are
actually
from
that
such
disciplines.
You
know
that
they
look
into
the
do
the
qualitative
research
and
and
really
reason
about
what
is
happening.
What
is
this
movement
right
and
then
yeah?
What
is
the
ethos?
A
A
What
are
we
optimizing
for
and-
and
this
is
basically
what
you
also
said-
like
a
lot
of
confusion
about
what
finance
should
be
for
and
what
it
is,
how
it
is
implemented.
A
A
C
A
It
doesn't
give
direction
right,
you
have
you
still.
We
still
have
to
find
it
ourselves
with
immense
freedom.
So
that's
that's
quite
an
interesting
space
to
be
in.
E
F
F
F
F
I
don't
know
if
you
remember
those
little
eyes.
F
And
I
don't
know
if
I
should
just
provide
some
kind
of
structure
or
maybe
just
kind
of
work
by
myself
or
I
don't
know
there.
I
think
I
need
to
ask
others
like
how
is
it
going
with
the
map
how's
it
going
with
the
nft
and
how
is
it
going
with
the
depth?
So
what
are
the
structures
there?
Because
if
I'm
just
working
in
the
blue
with
thinking
of
like
how
to
translate
one
idea
into
some
visual
idea,
then
it's
a
lot
of
like
work
to
constantly
rethink
it,
which
is
also
a
nice
challenge?
A
Is
there
a?
Is
there
a
concrete
case
of
work,
duplicated
that
we
that
we
understand,
where
does
it
happen
or
which,
which.
F
Just
posted
it
on
the
thread
and
I
just
posted
the
thread
in
the
thread
on
the
what's:
it
called
the
console.
A
F
E
Yeah,
so
I
think
in
terms
of
like
architecture,
satori,
letty
and
and
merch.
E
A
Okay,
and
and
what
do
you
think
like
in
one
case,
you
could
also
see
this
as
people
actually
who
can
contribute
those
things
are
doing
and
and.
A
Expressing
what
is
in
their
minds
and
then
putting
it
out
there
doesn't
that
help
in
actually
seeing
the
potential
and
seeing
where
collaboration
can
happen
or
where
someone
else
you
know
is,
is
farther
faster,
better
and
and
one
one
would
do
some
some
other
domains
like.
Could
we
use
that
not
saying
the
application
as
in
oh,
we
know
exactly
what
this
is,
and
this
is
the
exact
duplicate
of
what
has
been
done,
but
actually
making
use
of
these
expressions
to
see
what
are
the
collaboration
areas.
E
It's
duplicating
that
the
work
is
not
actually
the
same,
but
more
like
people
are
doing
working
on
the
same
thing,
which
is
cool
if
you're.
Okay,
with
that,
I
guess,
if
everyone's
okay
with
it,
but
I
know
for
sure,
from
the
onboarding
team.
Well,
I
think
it
was
mentioned
that
it
kind
of
felt
like
yeah.
E
It
was
just
like
well
what,
then,
what
do
we
do
now,
because
the
work
that
we
were
working
on
it
turns
out
that
the
gamer,
what
we
saw
on
the
last
working
group
call,
was
pretty
much
like
an
omega
onboarding.
So
then
it's
like
okay!
Well,
it's
just
the
same
thing:
we're
already
low
energy
anyway,
let's
not
continue
working
on
this
yeah.
C
I
think
yeah
I
think,
like
last
week,
we
were
duplicating
kind
of
the
work
because
we
had
this
week
this
call
on
monday
and
we
were
singing
up
to
this
architecture.
C
They
were
steph
satori
me
well,
several
people
in
you,
the
onboarding
team,
were
working
at
the
same
time
in
the
other
on
boarding
stuff,
and
then
we
call
this
things
and
we
saw
okay.
This
is
like
duplication,
because
it
was
the
same
initiative
by
like
different
look-alikes,
so
I
feel
like
it
was
like
energies
towards
the
initiative,
but
then
this
was
too
thin,
like
people
didn't
feel
they
were
doing
effective
work.
C
It
is
not
like
it's
duplicated
in
a
way
because
the
initiatives
were
there
and
all
the
people
were
like
a
little
bit
interested
in
working
in
this
constituency
library.
But
then
we
saw
like
it
was
duplicating
energies
more
than
work
like
trying
to
work
on
the
same
things
from
a
different
perspective,
so
and
then
not
coordinating
this
with
within
the
group
yeah.
C
Yes,
you're
working
on
that,
but
then
it's
like
you're
losing
an
idea.
Yeah,
I
mean
it's
on
boarding
if
on
boarding
we
talk
about
this.
It's
like
this
super
too
big
thing,
and
it's
not.
That
has
no
focus.
I
see
that,
like
super
proud
to
to
be
depleting
our
ideas
from
people
like
you
discuss.
This
super
broad
focus
like
very
prone
to
that
as
well.
C
That's
it
I'm
exhausted
too,
so
I'm
not
the
best
person
today,
yeah,
I
I
will.
I
will
be
taking
care
of
as
well
for
for
my
energies,
that's
my
for
those
of
you
who
have
not
been
here
before
with
this
reflection
exercise
when
we
were
trying
to
analyze
and
personally,
where
our
levels
of
energy
are
and
what
what
do
we
give
energies
to
and
when?
Where
do
we
get
energies
from?
And
I
just
have
this
super
enlightening
moment
when
I
see
that
I'm
close
to
burnout,
so
it's
just.
C
I
think
there
is
no
like
these
questions
about
what
is
energizing
me
or
not.
It's
like
at
which
level
am
I
right
now
and
it's
it's
not
only
from
my.
I
have
this
too
many
responsibilities
inside
this
space
and,
of
course,
it's
interrelated
and
when
I
feel
I'm
not
giving
my
whole
energies
to
omega,
I
just
feel
like
the
group
is
at
the
same
level.
So
it's
like
all
is
interconnected,
really.
A
Again
or
you
know,
coming
from
other
projects,
what
I,
what
I
see
is.
A
What
I
see
is,
okay,
you
know
jobs
to
be
done,
things
that
are
always
done
the
same
way
and
even
in
those
crazy
novel
way
of
creating
a
library
and
the
novel
experience
of
this
library,
things
will
be
done
the
same
like
this
coordination.
Who
is
doing
what
or
how
many
people
are
currently
thinking
about
design.
It
can
be
amazingly
source
of
abundance
right,
but
not
of
course,
if
someone,
if
we
think
that
it's
duplicating
work
right
so
definitely
and
then
yeah.
A
So
I
would
be
interested
in
figuring
how
to
figure
this
out,
but
from
the
regenerative
workflow
perspective,
it's
a
it's
a
definitely
like
communications
issue.
Yeah
yeah
go
ahead.
H
I
keep
on
going
back
to
that
to
this
concept
that
we
keep
on
talking
about
in
the
dynamic
energy
budget,
about
the
relationship
to
the
contact
points
and
so
like.
We
need
to
map
out
and
identify
the
ecosystem
of
omega
and
like
these
contact
points,
for
instance,
like
monday.
Imaginarium
creative
flow
sessions
is
like
the
contact
point
for
the
nfp
self-discovery
game,
also
to
kind
of
like
get
it
in
contact
and
see
who
wants
to
work
on
the
website
like
that's
what
it
is
involved
with
youtube.
H
I
think
it's
consolidating
and
maybe
even
like
a
dancing
the
people
that
are
interested
in
the
similar
work
like,
for
instance,
to
I
should
because
I
I
have
a
relationship
with
within
the
bathroom,
but
helping
them
guide
them
to
to
help
steph
and
and
everybody
within,
like
the
visual
aspect
of
the
website,
you
know,
but
also
too,
I
think
what
I
think
it's
for
us
and
deb
to
create
like
that
visual
kind
of
like
map.
H
I
keep
on
going
back
to
that
that
one
when
nick
was
showing
the
onboarding
island,
but
I
wanted
like
like
like
a
sow,
but
it's
like
like
what
what
the
contact
points
of
what's
going
on
in
omega
and
hopefully
like
later.
This
becomes
like
the
compass
to
like
navigate
the
the
the
library.
E
H
H
Yeah,
but
what
I'm
saying
is
it's
like
an
easy
one
for
for
all
of
us
to
like?
Well,
I
mean
we're
saying
it,
but
it's
like
like
the
cheat
sheet
to
do
it
right,
so
the
image
that
of
of
like
the
compass,
so
I
I
I
view
it
should
be
more
like
looking
like
a
sound
but
encompass
is
fine
too.
You
know
and
that
that
is
like
you
know,
the.
What
we
were
talking
actually
earlier
than
dynamic
energy
budget
is
is
to
identify
those
points
of
that
we
already
have.
H
We
already
have
structures
like
we're
talking
about.
We
we're
not
necessarily
labeling
and
defining
them
at
structurally
in
the
list,
but
we
do.
We
do
have
ways
that
we're
already
doing
it,
the
the
what
I'm
referring
to
the
contact
points
of
the
day.
You
know
every
week
we
have
open
meeting
on
on
mondays.
H
We
have
the
two
kind
of
meetings
today
and
within
that
we
have
the
asynchronistic
contact
points
of
the
threads,
also
coupled
with
the
figment
board,
and
the
mirror
like
this
is
our
landscape
of
how
we
navigate
the
directing
our
energies
towards
this
project
like
these.
These
are
the
the
this
is
the
landscape,
and
these
are
the
areas
where
people
are
already
directing
their
energy
sports
and
yeah,
but
like
at
that
that
visual
of
of.
A
Where
do
you
see
the
boards
that
you
know
that
that
spun
up
now
in
the
work
on
the
convenience
library.
E
It's
in
the
consilience
library
thread.
Let
me
just
keep
scrolling
up
and
I'll
I'll
grab
it
and
paste
it
on
the
dock.
Here.
A
A
Or
simpler,
like
we
have
the
meetings,
we
have
the
conversations
and
threads
and
then
we
have
the
boards
that
people
either
use
for
their
own
ideations
or
collaboratively
right.
So
when
we
have
the
tea
coincidence,
library
as
part
of
the
archipelago,
onboarding
right
and.
A
But
like
the
question
is:
should
we
continue
working
within
the
the
island,
the
coincidence,
library
and
the
board
and
connect
all
other
boards?
Even
you
know,
if
you
say,
I'm.
A
I
like
to
work
alone,
which
is
totally
you
know:
okay
good,
you
know,
but
this
is
what
I'm
currently
working
on
or
this.
These
are
the
areas
I'm
currently
working
on.
This
is
the
input
that
I
require.
This
is
what
what
is
coming
out
and
and
have
a
look
at
it,
because
I
think
it
is
going
to
be
going
to
be
the
input
of
this
or
that
so
I
mean
when
we
work.
A
E
I
think
the
issue
is
or
would
you
like
to
go
ahead?
Sorry,
no.
H
I
was
just
gonna
say
it's:
it's
like
how
to
translate
the
different
areas
of
that
the
board
right
like
I
could
translate
like
how
to
read
my
board.
H
B
H
Of
breaks
down
like
that
blah
blah
blah,
and
then
I
go
on
how
I
you
know,
broke
off
the
narrative
of
what
what
I'm
probably
talking
about
what
we
talked
about
in
omega.
A
Coming
from
coming
from,
you
know
one
or
more
weeks
off,
but
in
entirely
different
working
environments
and
number
one.
I
think
this
is
really
where
we
are
at
figuring
out
our
mandalas,
like
a
personal
self
organization.
How
do
I
organize
my
work
and
then
how
do
I
share
it
with
others?
So
we
actually
get
not
too
creative
comments
right,
but
a
collaborative
comments
and
again,
that
is
something
you
can
search
for.
A
It
collaborative
comments,
it's
a
blank
canvas
identified
by
jeremy
rifkin
and
I
think
this
is
exactly
what
you're
doing,
but
there
is
no
explanation
of
it
yet
or
explication
of
it.
It
is
happening
and
we're
struggling
through
it
and
within
omega,
especially
with
this
whole
original,
workflow
research,
etc.
The
whole
point
is
that
we
don't
give
in
and
say
hey.
This
is
duplicate
work.
A
I
think
we
should
have
a
you
know,
a
four
worker
and
the
task
scheduler
and
you
know,
let's
not
fall
back,
let's
no,
don't
give
up
and
we're
gonna
get
there
it's.
It
is
different.
It
is
different
than
just
pure
creative
work,
yes,
bring
your
creativity,
but
in
a
way
that
others
can
find
their
interface
or
their
contact
points
too,
and
it
is
always
like
it's
like.
C
C
A
A
Spread
out
the
task
get
the
job
done
be
done
with
it,
but
our
experiment
is
really
why
we're
doing
it.
Can
we
please
figure
out
what
it
is,
how
we
want
to
do
it
differently,
because
right
now
we're
doing
the
same
thing
that
the
big
siemens
global
conglomerate
is
doing.
You
know
we
call
it
working
groups,
we
call
it
stewards.
What
have
you,
but
it's
like
groups
being
managed
someone's
saying,
what's
needs
to
be
done,
others
agreeing
to
it
and
then
getting
the
job
done.
It's
not
siemens.
A
So
if
you're
just
going
to
replicate
this,
you
know
that
that
would
I
I
don't
think
that's
why
we're
here,
we're
here
really
to
figure
out
what
it
is
that
we're
that
we're
seeing
that
we're
struggling
that
to
to
get
out
yeah,
and
it's
not
two
of
them
processes,
doing
everything
for
us,
automate
all
the
things
and
that
the
techie
view
are
coming
into
this.
Okay,
it's
shattered.
That's
not
gonna
happen,
but
we're
not
gonna
go
back
to
politics
either.
I
I
When
you
human,
you
said
that
you
know
cement
was
organizing
ex-southern
of
employees.
I
was
wondering
you
know
how
much
a
big
corporation
create
wealth
because
they
do
organize
employees.
I
mean
I'm
wondering
you
know,
I'm
wondering
where
the
wealth
is
coming
from.
I'm
that's
just
a
question.
I
wanted
to
raise
this
idea
of
organizing
people.
You
know
what
does
that
mean
and
what
is
the
imagination
and
what?
Where
does
it,
connect
to
in
industrial
or
industrial
society
and
yeah.
A
The
again
big
research
question
people
are
starting
just
asking
themselves
and
we
have
the
opportunity
here
to
live,
apply
it
and
then
figure
it
out.
So
it's
great
having
that
opportunity
in
a
lifetime
and
then
it's
about
self-organization,
look
up
these
words
self-organization
collaborative
commons,
and
they
are
saying
the
things
that
you
need,
but
there
is
no
how-to,
no
manual,
it's
not
have
been
figured
out.
Yet
there
are
things
like
teal
organizations
etc,
but
yeah.
I
don't
want
to
do
any
story.
I
just
wanted
to
say
this
is
a
great
opportunity.
A
This
is
a
great
task
challenge
for
the
regenerative
workflows
research
group
to
actually
dig
into
this
and
and
I'm
king.
So
I
just
wanted
to
offer.
F
I
would
like
to
add,
maybe
like
what
I
sometimes
feel
is
that
we
get
confused
between
when
we're
thinking
or
kind
of
like
brainstorming
or
posting
a
lot
of
things,
making
a
lot
of
material.
I
think
that's
a
very
creative
and
a
very
free-flowing
kind
of
form
of
work,
but
at
the
moment
that
it's
about,
like
getting
things
done
like
having
this
meeting,
also
implies
that,
like
this
court
is
working
we're
actually
using
some
kind
of
interface
that
has
been
developed.
F
So
I'm
constantly
trying
to
how
to
say,
like
I
think,
the
gratification
or
the
energy
flows
back
when
we're
actually
working
on
something
that
is
existing,
and
if
that
is
a
thing
that
needs
to
be
built
within
omega,
it
requires
some
kind
of
form
of
work,
which
also
needs
to
be
made
with
tools
that
are
yeah
that
are
standardized
at
this
moment.
So
otherwise
we
really
need
to
build
everything
from
scratch,
which
would
be
kind
of
a
crazy
thing
to
do.
F
So
just
to
say
like
sometimes
I
I
feel
that
I
just
need
to
keep
working,
which
can
be
maybe
a
bit
like
frustrating
until
that
there
is
some
kind
of
result
which
can
be
done
put
into
a
group
and
be
like
commented
upon
or
kind
of
like
analyzed
and
put
apart
or
like
free
flowing
again.
So,
like
that's
a
bit
like
what
I
feel
sometimes
where
we
get
lost,
where
we're
talking
about
things,
have
new
ideas
and
a
week
later,
we
didn't
really
come
to
something
that
is
fruitful.
F
So
it's
always
like
plucking
fruits
before
they're.
Really
there
that's
a
bit
like
how
I
sometimes
feel
in
this
process,
just
to
say,
like
from
my
point
of
view,
I'd
rather
keep
working
onto
something
when,
with
an
artwork
also
like
when
the
artwork
says
like
okay,
the
artwork
is
kind
of
ready
to
be
abandoned.
It's
never
finished
when
the
artwork
is
there
to
know
in
this
matt
saudian
kind
of
a
thing
when
the
artwork
says
like
okay,
now
it's
time
to
do
something
else,
then
it's
an
artwork
with
the
library.
F
E
E
Alive,
secondly,
I
think
it's
not
just
a
problem
of
oh,
we
don't
have
a
a
one
place
where
we
all
put
a
work
in
it's
more
like
we
have
a
diversity
of
thoughts
here.
How
do
we
decide
on
which
thought
to
move
forward,
since
everyone
has
knowledge
to
to
bring
in?
How
do
we
know
how
to
move
forward?
Now
that
we've
got
all
the
knowledge,
then
do
we
choose
one?
Do
we
vote
on
them
like?
What
do
we
do.
A
So
we
have
individuals
works
and,
as
staff
said,
they
need
to
be
worked
on
until
the
individual
fields.
It
can
be
shared
right
so
and
then,
when
it
is
shared-
and
there
has
been
work
on
on
similar
topics,
do
you
see
that
as
duplicate
or
do
you
see
that
hey
interesting?
I
want
to
look
into
it.
What
is
it
that
we
could
be
collaborating
on?
What
is
it
that
we
could
be
jamming
on
and
so
on,
and
do
we
have
that
kind
of
agreement
or
protocol?
For
that?
A
It
seems
like
what
I
hear
is:
okay,
multiple
people
worked
on
design
and
it
is
duplicate
work
or
is
it
an
invitation
to
see
how
one
can
collaborate
and
then
also
the
question
could
could
the
people
have
would
would
it
make
a
difference
if
you
knew
that
every
one
of
those
were
working
on
some
part
of
the
design
or
architecture
and
so
on
by
actually
sharing
their
boards
directly
or
being
on
the
same
board?.
J
Yes,
no,
no,
sorry,
I
I
was
a
bit
late
because
I
had
some
traffic
jumps
I
joined
later,
and
no
because
I
was
just
to
take
up
the
idea
of
let's
say,
having
more
qualitative
research
and
doing
like
this
focus
groups.
J
A
Yeah,
definitely
the
focus
groups
are
for
the
token
engineering
ethical
principles.
It
would
be
great
to
have.
Maybe
I
put
it
just
on
the
agenda
for
for
next
week
and
if
you
can
share
I'll
tag
you
and
and
in
the
chat,
if
you
can
share
a
bit
like
what
did
that
you
wanted
to
look
in,
I
think
you
could
definitely
use
some
some
collaboration
support.
There
would
be
great.
B
I
want
to
do
also
around
the
time
that
the
the
tokens
from
the
hatch
unlock,
so
I
want
to
let's
see
my
broad
question-
is
how
do
how
does
private
profit
play
out
against
a
common
benefit,
and
I
think
that
this
unlocking
is
is
a
great
moment
where
you
can
see
how
how
major
token
holding
addresses
behave
and
also
have
interviews
before
that
and
after
or
focus
groups,
and
I'm
still
wondering
whether
some
of
that
could
be
relevant
for
what
you
want
to
find
out
as
well
or
rather,
if
I
could
frame
my
question
so
that
it
fits
you.
B
H
B
A
Collected
yeah
exactly
we
have
collected
some
some
some
topics,
like
the
soul,
incentive
mechanisms
and
mechanisms
shaping
our
behavior,
but
also
our
mindset
shaping
those
having
shapes
those
incentives,
especially
with
talking
string,
ethics,
sorry
top
entering
comments,
and
that
is
one
major
topic
that
matt
wants
to
take
up.
F
A
And
it
would
be
fanta
yeah.
It
would
be
fantastic
to
to
have
a
focus
group
around
that
maybe
yeah.
Maybe
the
I
think
that
the
incentive
questions
or
behavior
shaping
architecture
that
we
create
it's
a
bigger
question
and
then
concretely,
we
ask
okay
and
the
design
of
the
hatch
and
the
incentives
and
the
rules
that
we
put
in
place
that
provided
some
behavior.
How
is
it
going
to
change
or
how?
How
will
these
participants
behave
during
those
decisive
changes
right?
A
That
would
be
fantastic
and
if
you
can
edit
in
in
the
chat
either
in
omega
or
if
you
want
in
token
entering
ethics
and
principles
topic,
we
could
definitely
form
and
find
maybe
yeah
either
sub
questions
in
those
focus
groups,
but
definitely
a
place
plays
well
and
and
yeah,
and
what
I
need
to
do
is
also
publish
the
the
summary
of
the
first
focus
group
that
we
did
and
the
subsequent
work
some
of
the
token
entering
ethical
principles
and
practice
sessions.
A
So
I'm
hoping
that
we
get
some
more
of
those
obvious
questions,
big
questions,
and
it
would
be
great
to
have
your
point
of
view
like
if
those
are
interesting
to
take
up
in
in
your
research
would
be
greater
when
we
have
a
proper
analysis.
G
B
Okay,
so
shall
lydia
and
me
prepare
something
from
our
side
for
next
week.
Then.
A
Yeah,
okay,
and
if
you
can
share
it
already
in
the
in
the
in
the
thread,
it
will
become
a
topic
definitely
on
the
agenda
anyways,
because
you've
been
working
on
it,
so
please
share
actively
and-
and
it
will
be
then
on
the
attainment.
Okay,
okay-
and
I
can
also
focus
more
on
that.
D
E
A
You
know
about
about
the
collection,
so
what
what
is
interesting
is
I
I
am
having
some
private
dms
or
yeah
dms
with
income
denta
right
and
actually
he
is,
he
is
pretty
active
in
decorations
and
he
points
out
to
things
that
he
shared
in
decoration.
So
I
think
it
definitely
is.
A
E
Oh
well,
I
just
wanted
to
create
like
a
discord
server
where
people
can
start.
You
know,
learning
from
the
content
and
curating
content,
but
not.
E
But
since
it's
separate
it's
it's
a
bit
more
clear
like
the
the
user
flow
for
it,
and
we
can
also
start
implementing
like
ways
to
like
observe,
I
guess
the
energy
flows.
You
could
say
and
yeah
and
then
from
there
use
our
learnings
to
apply
to
the
actual,
like
library
website,.
E
E
B
A
Okay,
but
I
think
we
need
we
need
it
otherwise,
yeah,
I
if,
in
my
view-
and
it's
not
just
my
view,
but
it's
it's
actually
a
living
wisdom.
You
know
just
designing
in
our
heads
what
what
is
it
we
need
to
space
where
people
are
actively
creating
and
actively.
A
Actively
using
that
curation,
we
need
that
space
in
whatever
prototype
form
it
has,
and
I
think
the
omega
creation
is
happening
and
people
are
referring
to
their
creation.
Saying
hey,
you
know.
C
All
share,
I
would
collect
into
racing
things
like
we
were
focusing
on
the
design
because
it
was
like
yes
transposing
all
these
collective
creation
in
the
website
to
have
personality,
so
it
wasn't
empty
when
some
visitor
is
coming
right.
So
the
thing
was,
like
our
energies
were
focused
on
the
design
to
to
to
transpose
the
content
that
wasn't
ready.
A
Yeah
yeah,
but
then
so
I
would
definitely
support
that
and
also
bring
in
people
actual
alpha
users,
as
I
mentioned,
also
have
them
active
because
otherwise
we're
going
to
design
things.
Maybe
they
are
normal,
etc,
but
only
in
our
designer's
head
and
that's
something
we
say
token
engineers
shouldn't
do
and
I
think
ux
designers
shouldn't
do
either.
A
So,
let's
get
to
space
where
people
actually.
A
C
F
Yeah,
when
we
were
going
through
this
ideas
for
the
website
to
come
to
some
kind
of
specifics
or
like
the
whole
idea
of
getting
this
library
thing
is
to
tell
to
these
designers
what
are
the
characteristics.
F
B
F
G
A
F
A
Mean
the
few
designers
are
actually
those
who
we
want
to
build
this
for
people
curating
for
the
library
and
people
using
the
curation
right,
so
that
that's
the
thought
that
the
the
pitfall,
the
pattern
that
we
go
back
to.
F
Yeah,
the
paradox
and
the
question
there
is
between
like
okay,
like
what
do
we
send
if
we
want
somebody
to
interact
with
the
curation
like?
What
do
we
send
this
person?
Is
it
a
google
document?
Is
it
like
a
yacht
form,
or
is
it
kind
of
integrated
website
like
what
is
this
kind
of
first
context
with
the
library.
A
I
mean
what
is
it
yeah,
but
what
is
it
now,
like?
The
google
docs
that
we
send
out
prove
to
be
absolutely
not
engaging
anyone
even
us
what
works
is
the
the
channel
where
people
just
drop
their
curation
and
ask
or
interact,
and
we
should
definitely
you
know
our
signal.
It
is
working.
People
are
interacting
with
those
creations
like
make.
Let's
make
that
a
space
I
I
would
definitely
go
go
for
it
before
you
know
stepping
back
again
and
say
we
have
we
don't
know
what
I
mean.
We
have
tried
the
google
docs.
A
No,
we
have.
I
tried
the
channel.
Yes,
it
works
better
people
are
engaging,
let's
get
more
people
to
do
their
creations,
but
doing
it
in
tech
is
going
to
be
difficult,
and
if
we
have
a
discord,
server
for
doing
creations
and
interacting
as
alpha
testers
with
those
curations
and
expressing
wants
and
needs.
A
That
is
where
we
will
get
information
about
how
people
interact
with
the
transdisciplinary
knowledge
and
again
also
when
we
have
people
there
interacting,
then
we
can,
you
know,
play
around
with
them.
With
the
you
know,
the
balloons
satori
balloons
right
about
self-discovery
as
as
a
game
through
knowledge.
F
F
G
E
A
Yeah,
of
course
I
mean
at
the
end
it
should
be
a
website,
but
should
be
people
wait
until
the
website
is
finished,
or
can
we
make
steps
where
creations
and
interaction
with
creations
can
happen?
While
we
are
again
also
interacting
with
you
know,
how
could
this
look
and
feel
and
the
wireframes
and
so
on
and.
E
E
E
F
E
F
For
a
wire
for
an
architecture
or
a
wireframe,
do
I
just
build
templates
that
all
these
things
then
can
kind
of
that
people
can
onboard
through
the
website
and
then
later
on?
We
can
eliminate
features
or
at
which
point,
or
is
it
going
to
be
sent
to
a
web
designer
because
for
me,
just
to
know
like
how
much
of
it
is
kind
of
like
part
of
this
library
thing
like
which
kind
of
processes
happen
and
what
isn't
so
or
or
maybe
I
just
keep
building
until
I
really
don't
know
anymore.
A
A
A
The
other
thing
playing
around
getting
creative.
I
want
to
play
with
this
total
freedom,
but
then
you
know
that
that's
the
freedom
that
you
take
right,
but
if
you're
building
features
for
people
to
use,
who
are
those
people
right
and
again,
the
library
is
actually
super
straightforward
in
a
sense,
there's
curated
material,
meaning
there's
a
created
journey,
meaning
people
actually
create
content.
Who
are
these
people
yeah.
C
B
A
A
And
again
it
can
be
limited
to
people
and
and
curations.
So
there
is
no
wasted
effort
or
anything,
but
without
without
curators
and
without
people
looking
and
engaging
with
those
curations
thinking
about
features
again.
There's
the
novelty
aspect:
that's
why
it
is
totally
welcome
and
free
flowing
the
creative
flows.
A
Sync
points
are
there
for
that,
but
at
some
point,
when
you
have
something
that
is
a
feature
you
you
have
to
find
someone
who's
going
to
use
it
and
ask
them
what
they
think
right,
and
that
is
something
should
maybe
help
each
other
a
bit
more.
So
so
steph,
if
you
yeah,
if
you
feel
that
that
might
have
been
the
issue,
that's
yeah,
let's
rethink.
E
Yeah
well,
like
I
don't
know
if
you
saw
the
updates
on
that,
but
basically
I've
been
saying.
I
think
it
would
help
with
confusion
if,
like
steffy,
continue
like
helping
with
mert
and
satori
and
letty,
and
then
I
can
just
like
take
that
out
and
like
kind
of
work
on
it
as
a
personal
project,
because
I
think
I
think
that
idea
might
be
like.
I
guess,
like
energy
hit
like
heavy
or
it
requires
a
lot
of
energy
and
it's
something
that
I
can
do
personally
but
like.
B
E
F
B
B
F
Getting
some
orientation
because
otherwise
I
feel
I'm
just
kind
of
like
building
things,
and
I
don't
really,
of
course
like
building.
Just
a
library
aspect
is
very
easy,
like
that's
kind
of
the
myro
board,
that's
like!
What's
on
your
architecture
on
the
left
side,
but
then,
like
the
middle
of
like
the
whole
games
there,
it
also
became
very
clear
what
kind
of
you
know:
it's
just
a
kind
of
structure
within
that
structure.
There's
like
a
lot
of
possibilities
to
make
a
lot
of
different
things
than
to
kind
of
keep
things
connected.
E
A
It's
really
good
that
we
gave
each
other
feedback
on
that
then
so
question
that
came
up
as
well
before
we
go.
I
would
like
to
put
it:
do
you
think?
Is
it
possible
that
we
get
together
just
for
the
token
entering
concerns
library
and
go
through?
You
know
all
the
artifacts
that
have
come
out
and
you
know
clarified,
you
know
it
would
be
really
sad
if
people
are
saying
okay,
I
should
take
this
out
because
it's
confusing,
whereas
it
actually
was
motivating
and
so
on,
see.