►
From YouTube: W23 0mega WG: How to reach to more contributors
Description
The 0mega Working Group examines the ethos of and ethics in token engineering as well as the shared vision and diversity of its communities.
We gather every two weeks on Wednesday at 8pm CET.
Steward: Sebnem
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Is
opened
up
but
yeah
this
whole
scheduling
thing
takes
up
a
lot
of
energy
yeah.
B
A
A
The
the
problem
or
not,
the
issue
is
getting
started,
is
always
it's
just
too
big
of
a
too
big
of
a
challenge
to
bite
off
yeah
and
the
and
the
thing
is
even
breaking
it
down
into
tasks
can
be
daunting
right.
A
A
D
A
Yeah,
you
didn't
know,
but
I
realized
that
there
are
some
people,
maybe
not
in
our
group,
but
maybe
even
in
our
group
that
have
not
yet
read
the
paper
but,
for
example,
are
actually
asking
hey.
Where
is
the
flower
from
which
is
great?
We
have
a
meme
right,
but
I
think
maybe
we
should
really
start
with
taking
this
paper
apart
and
through
this
taking
it
apart
and
putting
together.
A
We
could
also
start
basically
this
whole
curation
process.
You
know
it's.
This
whole
paper
is
is
made
up
of
actually
pulling
together.
What
previous
research
and
academic
branches
have
looked
into
the
same
topics
and
set
of
problems
that
we
are
looking
into
this,
that
crypto
economic
systems
and
then
basically
saying
well,
no
surprise:
it's
a
system,
it's
a
complex
system.
Beyond
that,
it's
a
social
system
and
beyond
that
you
know,
we
don't
just
have
a
social
network
where
we
share
likes
and
so
on.
A
We
really
want
to
share
value
that
we
co-create
and
we
take
basically
crypto
economics
or
crypto
economic
systems
and
starting
off
from
from
bitcoin.
A
A
A
I
basically
did
the
double
major
computer
science
and
economics
and
later
basically
I
dropped
after
getting
into
computing
in
programming.
I
minored
in
economics.
I
came
back
to
germany
and
so
on
and
basically
and
everything
I
learned.
I
learned
at
siemens
literally
not
at
the
university
but
from
you
know,
fellow
engineers
and
power
system,
building,
automation
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
basically
went
into
interest
wise
machine
learning,
knowledge
management
and
a
little
bit
of
operations
research.
So
these
are
the
two
two
sides
right
and,
for
example,
can
you
say.
C
I
think
it
was
on
governance.
Like
I
forgot
the
name
of
the
paper
it
was,
I
mean
I
was
there
and
the
second
one
was
from
curve
labs
like
pat
yeah.
He
was
talking
about
rescuing
in
import
substitution
through
like
tokens
which
I'm
like
very
interested
with
political
science.
So
it
was
amazing,
like
these.
Those
two
papers.
A
A
In
my
view,
it
was
quite
simplistic
like
just
plug
in
computer
science
and
some
games
theory
or
crypto
crypto
and
game
theory.
That
was
this
was
the
understanding
before
and
it
was
always
something
like
something
is
missing.
Something
is
missing
because
of
all
of
these
rabbit
hole
lives
like
you
discover
so
many
complexities,
that
is
not
just
economics
and
not
just
distributed
systems,
and
not
even
just
money
and
so
on.
A
So
basically
what
we
could
do,
and
that
would
be
the
proposal
that
we
really
plugged
this
flower
into
its
petals
and
basically
each
one
of
us
I
mean
definitely
dugadas
and
manu
were
also
interested,
but
it
was
this
whole
coordination
problem
moloch.
A
I
guess
it's
really
hard
to
to
break
things
down
and
but
if
you
can
manage
to
break
it
down
into
something
that
has
rhythm
that
we
can
use
as
a
start,
I
believe
that
could
work,
and
basically
my
proposal
would
be
let's
plug
this
apart
and,
let's
have
you
know,
get
together.
It's
like
this
book
reading,
like
the
book
clubs,
but
more
like
the
the
other
way
around
that
we
pick
up
one
domain
yeah.
A
C
Yeah
I
I
thought
like
we
should
also
like
utilize.
This
asynchronous
work
like
so
I
think
maybe
if
we
can
like,
I
think,
as
far
as
I
see
in
the
space
people
will
pursue
the
work.
If
they
see
the
product
will
be
done
like
yeah
yeah.
So
maybe
we
can
create
like
tasks
with
you
now
like
what
we
need,
then
then
we
will
like.
We
will
share
it
publicly
and
we
will
say:
oh
if
you
like,
you
can
assign
it
yourself
so
yeah.
C
A
Yeah
yeah,
so
I'm
basically
that's
actually
pretty
straight
forward,
and
I
think
this
group
is
producing
already
quite
the
main
pillars
from
you
know
what
it
is
that
we
say
it's
about
ethical
conduct,
token
engineering,
inclusivity,
etc,
and
I
think
that's
basically
pretty
straightforward
and
we
have
like
every
other
group
and
that
also
needs
an
update.
A
So
what
we
need
to
do
is
basically
this
edited
yeah,
so
what
we
need
to
do
is
two
more
basically,
this
is
the
anchor,
but
it
was
since
the
beginning
or
since
we
did
this
okay,
what
is
it
that
this
is
about,
and
we
came
up
with
these
two
initiatives
to
learn
about
the
transdisciplinarity
in
token
string?
That
became
this
library,
the
consistence
library,
where
we
jumped
the
transdisciplinary
knowledge
together
and
the
other
one
is
going
to
be
t
ethics,
for
example,.
A
What
we
can
or
what
we
should
do,
we
should
create
then
two
posts
and
in
those
posts.
Basically,
I
think
it's
even
we
have
even
a
template
here.
D
D
A
A
B
Are
working
offline
on
some
detailed
things
about
making
some
of
this
stuff?
You
know
quantitative
and,
and
you
know
getting
deep
into
some
of
the
basic
principles
and
coming
up
with
graphics
and
whatnot
for
really
deep
dive
into
this,
but
trying
to
make
it
quantitative
as
well.
So
you
know
we're
both
kind
of
working
separately
on
those
things
so.
B
Oh,
just
you
know
we
just
taken
some
of
the
stuff
that
we've
already
brought
and
some
of
the
stuff
that
was
already
on
the
agenda
you
know
for
for
and
just
trying
to.
B
A
B
Just
you
know
so
he
and
I
are
kind
of
asynchronously
hacking
in
between
omega
meetings
too.
So
just
you
know,
okay.
B
We're
just
you
know,
the
point
was
really
that
it
just
felt
like
you
know
it's
better
to
to
sink
in
the
omega
groups
and
then
maybe
you
know
sort
of
hack
separately.
You
know
so
so
we're
kind
of
doing
that
plus
we're
just
doing
a
deep
dive
on
some
of
these
things.
You
know,
and
it
didn't
feel
like
a
good
use
of
omega's
time
so.
B
A
A
A
But
the
param
party
or
the
parameterization
of
the
bonding
curve,
doesn't
yet
have
any
augmentation
of
proposal
in
there
or
does
it
already
have
it.
A
Okay:
okay,
let's:
let's
do
that?
Definitely
yeah,
that's
important
and
actually
just
one
more
question.
Actually.
I
had
also
mentioned
that
with
another
discord,
invisible
economy
and
data
discord
and
they
would
be
interested
on
hosting
one
as
well.
A
A
I
was
thinking
the
tech
recording
is
the
discord
port,
but
apparently
it
has
absolute
assistance
still
here.
A
So,
okay,
okay,.
B
So
now,
suddenly,
I
feel,
like
I've
got
a
deadline
on
on
the
work
that
we're
doing
when
we
were
trying
to
just
kind
of
have
an
open
open-ended
thing.
So
we
could
come
up
with
what
we
needed.
But
now
I'm
just
like
hey
come
up
with
some
params
and
I'm
like
yeah
we're
trying
to
do
that.
But
now.
A
We've
got
a
deadline.
Do
you
think
that's
the
goal
I
mean,
if
have
you
ever
attempted
any
parameter
at
sessions
or
anything?
Oh.
B
A
So
I
I
think
what
zepty
wants
is
that
everyone
who
is
active
actually
goes
through
the
process
of
of
you
know,
looking
what
are
the
parameters
of
a
bonding
curve
of
the
total.
A
And
so
on,
and
maybe
it
gives
us
ideas
of
on
how
to
whether
this
is
something
or
whether
that's
too
full.
I.
I
think
it
will
be
much
more
complex
than
what
we
would
need
to
just
distribute
the
budget
to
the
contributors,
facilitators.
A
And
dada
had
approached
me
or
we
were
discussing
this
parameterization
of
bonding
curves
with
other
anyway,
so
we
can
put
together
and
yeah
have
one
gather
some
ideas
but
don't
feel
pushed
towards
coming
up
with
quick
parameters.
I
think
the
first
thing
we
really
need
to
do
is
breaking
these
initiatives
down
into
what
are
the
people?
What
we.
B
A
A
B
B
Of
the
effort
for
me
was
that
I
became
aware
after
last
week's
meeting,
that
what
was
happening
was
that
you
kept
sort
of
making
the
same
request
of
me
over
and
over,
and
I
was
like
okay.
I
think
I
just
need
to
stop
delaying
taking
all
this
stuff
into
all
these
different
contexts
and
actually
make
it
make
it
have
some
parameters
of
its
own.
You
know
something
actionable
and
quantifiable,
so
that's
kind
of
where
mono
and
I
have
kind
of
gone
to
so
last
week.
B
Sessions
for
us
was
was
just
syncing
up
to
say
what
are
some
basic
principles
we're
going
to
try
to
follow
in
terms
of
our
inquiry,
but
the
goal
is
basically
what
you've
been
asking
me
for
all
along
is:
how
do
you
take
all
these
different
things
that
you're
all
the
time
talking
about
and
turning
into
some
kind
of
actionable
data?
So
that's
kind
of
our
focus.
You
know-
and
I
didn't
want
to
you
know,
so
I
was
just
aware
that
I
just
keep
showing
up
to
say
what
about
this,
and
what
about
that
and
I'm.
A
Well,
all,
okay!
I
think
in
any
case,
it's
really
good
that
everyone
gets
into
those
reflection
mode.
What
am
I
bringing
in?
What
do
I
need
to
actually.
A
Provide
and
then
also
what
am
I
hoping
and
that
this
outcome
will
bring
to
the
community
yeah.
You
know,
why
are
we
doing
what
we're
doing
and.
B
A
End
from
the
t,
ethics,
it
will
be
a
short
overview
of
what
are
the
ethical
principles
right.
We
worked
out
through
months
almost,
and
we
have
according
sessions,
most
of
them
by
you,
but
many
facilitators
and
people
who
want
to
co-facilitate
from
this
group
of
those
sessions.
So
we
have
the
principles
and
we
have.
How
do
we
you
know
in
in
practice?
How
can.
B
A
Helpful
as
a
group
to
token
engineers
who
are
in
those
situations,
I
think
that's
pretty
clear,
but
again
it's
great
that
everyone
goes
and
says.
Okay.
What
is
the
sensible
approach
that
we
can
take?
That
is
that
works
for
for
individuals
and
then
proposing
it
to
the
group
and
maybe
riffing
off
and
coming
up
with
something
that
works
for
all
participants
or
all
active
participants
who
want
to
provide
would
be
fantastic
right
and
if
you
say
okay,
there
are
three
different
or
two
different
options
and
want
to
just
try
it
out
again.
B
B
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
report
that
we've
done
a
sync
session
and
we
have
a
basic
principles
thing
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
how
we're
going
to
proceed
and
then
we're
going
to
try
to
work
through
all
the
different
layers
over
the
next
month
or
so
and
then
try
to
come
up
with
something
that
hopefully
you'll
be
happy
with
in
the
end
and
yeah
I'm
volunteering
today.
So
I
have
a
little
time,
but
I've
gotta
go
probably
now
so
yeah.
A
No
worries
thank
you
for
for
updating.
A
A
A
That
will
be
the
creation
basically
right,
but
then
also
I'm
going
to
invite
people
who
I
know
you
know,
for
example,
inviting
pet
is
not
a
problem
at
all
right
and
I'm
sure
he'd
be
he'd,
love
to
join
and
then,
basically,
in
that
session,
already
talking
about
specific
one
or
relating
it
to
the
others.
Because
what
is
the
importance
or
what
is
the
difference
of
this
consilience
library?
A
A
Handle
the
complexity
of
it
more
consciously,
which
we
call
token
engineering
and
tokens
in
commons.
How
do
we
see
this
right
and
then,
basically
and
through
that
there
would
be
promotional
material
right?
There
will
be
community
engagement,
there
will
be
people
who
actually
are
shaping
that
they
come
in
and
also
see
what
is
token
during
commons
and
working
group
omega,
and
specifically,
this
consistent
initiative
is
about.
Maybe
they
get
excited
and
want
to
be
active,
want
to
share
more,
have
ideas
of
how
to
take
it
further
or
into
their
vows
and
libraries.
A
Yeah,
you
know
I'm
trying
to
come
up
with
something
that
is
fluid.
You
know
that
has
that
is
a
simple
process,
but
basically
generates
the
content,
the
creation,
the
community,
the
promotional
material
and
that.
B
C
C
C
A
C
If
we
can
like,
if
we
adopt
like
reputation
points
so
after
people
like
so
we
should
talk,
we
should
have
like
reputation
point
parameters
like
metrics,
so
how
do
we
allocate
them?
It's
like
tokenomics,
basically
like
who
will
have
reputations
and,
for
example,
stewards
will
have,
let's
say
1000
to
reputation.
Point
that
newcomer
will
have
like
200
reputation
point
so
stewards
will
have
some
power
to
like
lead,
especially
in
the
beginning
of
library
like
how
where
to
go,
etc.
C
Yeah,
mainly
maybe
on
that
thing
we
can
add
some
other
layer
which,
for
example,
like
a
special
case,
for
example,
designed
by
you
for
like
combining
three
branches
of
crypto
economics,
flower
and
making,
like
let's
say,
like
special
creation
of
the
week
or
month,
align
knowledge
more
into
like
more
unitary
thing.
A
So
my
my
learning
is
start
off
with
something
and
when
you
see
the
problems
or
potential
pitfalls
like
when
we
say
stuart
versus
newcomer,
okay,
power
dynamics,
usefulness
of
contribution,
sure
people
are
bored,
but
then
they
buy
votes.
This
is
basically
how
you,
how
you
go,
it's
a
good
idea,
but
what
could
go
wrong?
A
Oh
good
good.
What
could
go
wrong
and
then,
basically
you
you,
you
start
with
it
and
see
whether
it
goes
wrong
and
then
then,
basically
before
that,
though
you
we
just
need
to
have
a
thing
saying:
okay,
when
we
see
it,
the
system
is
being
gamed.
We
stop,
we
change,
we
improve
and
we
deploy.
We
redeploy
this
small
protocol
that
we
have.
What
I'm
thinking
is.
C
A
Gather
data
in
a
sense
like
we
got
the
data
and
we
I
call
it
now
process
side,
my
my
favorite
word
of
the
month.
A
So
basically,
this
task
list
right
we're
trying
we're
coming
up
with
something
that
we
say:
okay
kind
of,
but
then
once
we
have
gone
through
the
first
seat,
curator
and
their
experience,
they're
gonna,
say
hey.
This
worked
great.
This
is
how
you
should
do
it
make
a
list
of
top
five
invite
your
top
five
people.
A
Top
five
created
list
invites
the
people
that
you
think
have
contributed
to
that
domain
or,
at
the
very
least,
share
your
excitement
so
that
there
is
a
group
who
is
going
to
talk
about
that
curation
and
why
it's
such
a
great
thing
and
then
you
can
one,
can
invite
them
or
offer
it
to
the
token
engineering
community,
saying
hey
tonight,
we're
going
to
talk
about
this
and
that
host
right
then
comes
back
and
says:
okay.
It
took
me
one
month
already
to
to
prepare
this
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
What
worked?
A
What
didn't
work
and
then?
Basically,
the
next
creator
will
have
an
easier
starting
point,
or
it
could
be
that
next
creator
is
going
to
say,
I'm
super
creative,
I'm
going
to
do
it
very
differently,
but
through
this
whole
process
we
a
get
it
set
up
and
and
think
about
all
these
mechanics
that
exist
and
what
we
can.
Actually
you
know
what
are
the
kpis,
basically
that
that
we
are
looking
for
is
also
actually
important.
A
C
For
example,
we
talked
about
the
technocracy
issue
there
like
yeah,
for
example.
I
really
like
the
idea
of
reputation
point
because
it's
democratically
like,
for
example,
we
talk
about
a
newcomer,
will
can
create
a
creation
about
how
to
be
a
newcomer
in
crypto
space,
so,
okay,
so
like,
for
example,
the
reputation
point
will
allow
this
creation
to
be
very
high.
Let's
say
compared
to
my
academic,
political
science,
crypto
relationship
creation,
so
I
believe
introducing
with
implementation
point
will
help
our
like
contextual,
ethical
understanding
of
like
omega
into
library
a
lot.
C
A
No,
no
I'll,
I
I
like
it
and
we
should
make
it
transparent
that
that
there
might-
and
we
have
already
also
noted
it
down.
So
I
think
that's
definitely
one
point
and
if
I
understand
you
right,
you're
basically
saying
well
the
way
we
actually
distribute
those
reputation
points
is
basically
in
the
beginning,
we're
just
saying:
okay,
who's,
a
newcomer
and
who's
the
steward
right
now,
which
is
then
a
new
com,
a
newcomer
who,
who
has
basically
let's
say
because
they're
new.
A
They
have
a
zero
reputation
point,
but
they
are
offering
a
very
well
curated
list,
and
that
goes
that
is
upvoted
through
usefulness
and
that
can
have
a
appropriate
rating
right
so
that,
basically,
this
whole
power
dynamics
is
democratically
balanced
out.
C
Yeah
like,
for
example,
there's
a
little
bit
of
in
democratic
side
that
we
have
seed
creators
first
and
stewards
will
have
some
more
effect
initially,
but
we
talked
about
it.
Maybe
it
is
good
for
like
settling
the
direction
of
the
library
at
the
beginning.
Then
after
some
point
everything
will
be
equalized
like
every
people
will
happen.
C
A
When
we
have
the
specification
that
it's
very
easy
or
when
we
have
a
clear
specification,
then
it's
much
easier
to
implement
than
for
example.
If
you
now
look
for
a
developer,
they
will
be
like
okay.
What
do
you
want
me
to
develop?
A
Like
we
don't
know
we're
figuring
it
out,
try
this
and
that
so
things
like
this,
the
first
round
having
just
an
excel
file
because
we're
just
a
handful
of
people
and
the
the
issue
is
more,
on
the
other
hand,
actually
starting
creating.
A
You
know
not
swearing
off
the
people
who
are
actually
motivated
right,
let
them
do
their
annotations
and
well.
The
quality
is
better
than
nothing
right
and
we
here
are
really
motivated
people.
A
I
think
that
will
work
itself
out
like,
as
you
say
in
the
beginning,
we're
just
really
valuable
and
we
want
this
resource
we
can
provide
or
it
develops.
We
can
reach
out
to
people
who
who
would
be
wonderful,
curators
and
that's
fine.
A
A
Okay,
then,
for
the
kpis,
so
quality,
of
course,
that
it's
engaging.
A
Yeah,
I
think
in
the
in
the
first
iteration
it
will
be
well.
This
is
what
we
hope
for
and
what
we
wish
for
right
and
then
so
how
to
contribute.
Let's
go
to
right
manifesto,
sorry
manifesto
here.
C
C
C
A
One
second,
just
so
the
overview
crypto
economics
foundations
and
the
rational.
C
C
A
Yeah
we
can
invite
path
or
basically
through
past
the
maybe
the
the
guild
leader
or
how
they're
called
there.
But
basically,
why
do
we
want
this
meta
mymeta
number,
one
hoping
that
it
helps?
Basically,
you
know
creator
create
a
background.
Then,
if
we
have
any
badges
or
any
crypto
economics
implementation
that
we
can,
you
know
use
that
interface
to
show
the
reputation
points
exactly
and
so
on.
C
A
First
of
all,
self
select.
A
From
within
tech
and
te
community
steward
seed
creators
see
here,
we
go,
let's
call
it
situations
to
write
seed
creators
set
setup
profile.
A
A
A
That
thank
you.
So
it's
very
powerful.
We
can
have
all
sorts
of
connections
here,
but
I'm
not
very
fluent
in
it
either
so
some
select,
so
we
should
have
one
how
to
contribute.
First,
we
can
do
one
with
ourselves
saying:
okay,
everyone
who
wants
to
start
be
a
seed
creator
with
an
omega.
Let's
have
a
session
first
of
all,
go
through
the
how
to
contribute
yeah.
A
Question
mark,
so
what
we
need
is
how
to
contribute
done.
B
A
Right
manifesto
how
to
contribute,
and
then
we
go
to
pet
and
say
look:
this
is
what
you
want
to
do,
and
this
is
what
we
think
the
curator
profile
should
look
like
and
how
to
connect,
and
is
this
possible,
like
some
crypto
economics
fund,
I
know
they
have
nfts
badges
and
stuff,
so
we
could
have
a
steve
curate
the
badge.
Definitely,
then,
whether
it
is
linkable
to
notion
and
if
not
where
else
an
an
option
could
be,
we
do
this
in
ocean,
but
it
is.
A
The
thing
with
github
is,
most
people
won't
be
fluent,
and
that
will
be
a
blockage,
but
I
just
remembered
that
there
is
an
option
to
actually
commit
things
with
the
tag
of
someone
else
that
you
can
say.
This
was
the
contribution
of
someone
else
like
a
co-author
type
of
thing,
so
there
might
be
hacks,
but
again
it
could
be
also
that
yeah.
A
Exactly
because
he
here
also,
you
can
see
people,
for
example
right
and
if
we
have
you
know,
imagine
we
have
here
the
profiles
of
top
curators
like
this
right.
A
A
A
Think
well,
let's
do
it
like
this
creators
are
incentivized
and
advised
incentivized
to
call
sessions
about
their
their
curated
list
with
eg
people.
A
A
C
A
C
Then,
like
it
will
like
like
may
forward
you
to
appropriate
page,
you
like
to
learn,
for
example,
if
you
like
to
contact
somebody,
it's
there,
if
you
like
to
know
how
to
contribute
it's
there
or
like
it's
basically
a
start,
starting
page
talking
about
like
guiding
people,
how
to
find
their
ways
in
this
library
like
make
them
not
like
lost
yeah.
Exactly.
A
Yeah,
that
can
be
in
in
parallel
in
parallel
yeah
after
these
two
and
that
can
be
in
parallel
and
basically
write
manifesto.
A
Have
you
seen
how
these
things
could
be
connected,
for
example,.
A
So,
for
example,
we
say:
hey,
you
basically
get
get
extra
extra
points.
If
you
can
present
articles
that
combine
many
yeah
exactly
many
things
and
how?
How
do
we
link
it?
Then,
for
example,
let's
say
and
it's
a
good
example
like
the
crypt
economics
foundation's
paper
right-
let's
say
I
I
add
an
annotation
to
it.
A
A
C
Maybe
we
can
like,
under
before
top
creators,
we
can
just
open
pages,
called
like
political
science,
ethics,
ai
and
you
will
click,
but
then,
if
we
think,
if,
if
if
the
creator
thing,
it
is
like
linked
to
both
things,
he
can
fork
this
creation,
both
both
things.
It's
possible
yeah,
it's
possible
in
notion.
I
know.
A
It
should
be
right,
so
basically
it
should
be
possible
because
it's
really
like
a
database,
the
structuring
it
should
be
possible
when
I
click
on
this
paper
right
and
I
see
the
site
of
I-
I
see
inside
my
annotation.
B
A
Would
be
like
this
card
right,
I
see,
I
see
this
annotation
and
I
see
where
it
belongs
to,
but
then
I
can
also
pick,
let's
say,
political
science,
and
I
I
see
this
and
inside
I
see
all
of
the
articles
or
papers
or
books
that
have
been
tagged,
political
science,
but
I
will
tag
this
article,
political
science.