►
From YouTube: Graviton Training Session #4: Roleplays :D
Description
On the recording we show the conclusions of every group that participated in their roleplay groups!!
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Really
fun
experience
to
see
how
this
exercise
went.
It's
really
funny,
because
everyone
was
at
first
really
lost,
and
first
everyone
was
trying
to
push
for
their
own
interest.
Okay,
that
hey
everyone.
We
just
have
one
group
missing
that
they
still
working
on
the
on
the
agreement,
but
it
was
very
funny
to
see
that
at
first
everyone
was
only
defending
their
interest
or
for
their
part
interest.
A
And
then,
after
a
time
all
of
the
groups
were
talking
about
joint
interest
and
also
there
were
all
of
the
groups
talked
about
feelings,
and
I
loved
that
at
certain
point,
or
some
all
of
the
groups
talked
about
having
an
apology
between
the
parts
involved
and
also
trying
to
see
deeper
into
into
into
the
conflict
like
not
only
having
the
the
the
information
that
is
on
top
and
the
really
basic
information,
but
trying
to
see
deeper
into
what
caused
the.
A
What
caused
the
conflict
and
also
a
lot
of
the
groups,
talked
about
like
having
an
agreement
to
have
non-violent
communication
because
they
were
like
calling
their
names
one
another,
and
they
were
not
like
having
a
good
communication
between
parts
so
yeah.
It
was
really
nice
to
see
like
how
everybody
at
the
end
also
talked
about
about
the
feelings
of
the
parts
and
how
can
like
they
benefit.
A
So
I
want
to
hear
from
you
what
was
your
experience?
There
were
five
groups.
I
am
going
to
go
in
order,
so
I
am
going
to
go
first
with
the
group
of
santi
sem
and
septimus.
How
did
you
go?
Did
you
make
an
agreement.
B
Yes,
I
can
lead,
and
then
I
can
the
word
to
the
other
part,
but
we
have
agreed
to
integrate
the
mr
gate
that
showed
interest
for
the
new
product
that
that
hacker
has
been
developing,
integrate
him
in
the
company
and
lead
the
marketing
and
sales
area
of
the
company.
That
way,
we
solve
the
problem
of
of
letting
our
r
d
go
away
because
it
will
come
back
to
the
company.
B
We
will
be
part
of
the
company
and
try
to
and
try
to
solve,
the
issues
that
have
lead
to
the
conflict,
defining
the
boundaries
of
work
for
r
d
in
future
and
and
basically
that's
that's
the
agreement
that
we've
we've
reached.
I
I
can
give
word
to
the
other
part.
C
Yeah,
we
are
happy
with
with
the
agreement,
because
we,
our
client,
actually
is
more
aligned
with
he.
He
never
wanted
to
go
out
of
the
of
the
company
and
what
he
actually
wanted
was
to
have
a
more
active
part
in
the
research
and
development
which
well
he's
happy
with
if
having
and
letting
and
start
and
letting
the
the
mr
gates
take
the
other
part
that
he's
not
that
interested.
D
E
C
A
Yes,
it
is
an
important
option
to
rewrite
the
employment
agreement
to
avoid
future
disputes,
because
maybe
you
can
solve
this
dispute,
but
it
arrives
again,
so
we
can
try
to
like
avoid
having
the
same
dispute
in
the
future
and
also
like-
including
some
of
these
things
into
into
the
new
agreement.
Okay,
we're
going
to
go
into
the
next
group
that
was
greece,
tam
and
ygg.
F
Yeah,
I
have
some
notes
here
that
I'll
read
we
came
to
an
agreement
yeah.
This
was
quite
the
process.
It
got
very
heated.
There
was
a
lot
of
name
calling
at
the
beginning,
so
that
was
one
of
the
first
things
we
came
to
is
we.
Both
parties
had
to
agree
to
come
to
a
level
of
professionalism
and
maturity,
and
no
more
name
calling
and
mutual
respect.
F
So
I'll
read
what
we
have
here.
We
offer
an
investment
deal
to
gates
hacker
requires
that
the
team
have
a
dedicated
marketing
and
sales
person.
Hacker
also
requires
a
recognition
of
mistakes
and
attributions
that
the
business
side
was
not
properly
executed
and
that
hacker
gets
creative
credit
for
the
production
of
power
screen
hacker
will
have
a
research
and
development
role
from
now
on
and
hacker
will
engage
with
maturity
and
professionalism.
F
And
so
yeah,
as
for
feelings,
I
can
say
it
was
quite
heated,
I
think
the
majority.
The
bulk
of
this
case
is
about
feelings,
particularly
me
and
tamara
were
representing
hacker,
and
we
could
see
in
the
agreement
there
that
he
wasn't
the
finances
weren't
his
first
goal.
His
first
mission
was
to
just
have
proper
recognition
for
what
he
had
created.
So
I
think
that
was
a
really
big
part
of
it.
A
Yes,
feelings
are,
I
I
wouldn't
say
always,
but
most
of
the
times
key
to
solving
disputes,
because,
as
we
saw
in
earlier
sessions
when
people
don't
feel
recognized
or
feel
that
their
feelings
are
being
ignored
or
or
they
are
being
hurt,
they
tend
to
close
or
to
react
irrationally
just
to
defend
themselves.
A
So
I
think
that
the
position
of
hacker
like
yes
sumi,
that
is
just
a
position
that
he
took
because
of
defense
like
trying
to
defend
himself,
but
it
was
not
like
the
most
rational
decision,
because
if,
if
we
sue
this
case,
it's
gonna
be
very
complex
and-
and
both
of
the
parts
have
have
a
good
point
in
in
the
in
the
argument,
but
there
is
also
an
employment
agreement.
A
So
it's
it's
it's
a
complex
case,
but
it
shows
how
sometimes
what
we
need
to
reach
a
better
solution
is
just
to
communicate
and
and
how
sometimes,
even
though
that
the
direct
parts
involved
are
not
having
the
dialogue,
maybe
the
two
third
parts
that
are
professional,
professionally
responsible
can
like
make
an
agreement
for,
for
for
when
two
parts
are
having
communication
issues.
I
want
to
know
if
pam
or
grief
have
to
say
something.
G
I
grew
up
a
lot
during
that
call.
I
I'll
be
honest,
I
you
know
people
kept
dropping
in
and
I
kept
telling
the
star
side
of
the
story,
and
maybe
I
was
being
a
little.
You
know
emotional
about
it
and
I
I
I
learned
to
keep
a
calm
head.
You
know
I
went
to
the
balcony
and
I
and
then,
and
so
we
could
build
the
bridge
and
yeah.
That
was
my
side,
but
but
no
I
I
I
I
think
we
just
we.
G
We
we
had
to
kind
of
rush
it
near
the
end.
It
would
have
been.
It
was
tough.
We
needed
more
time
really
to
debate
the
finer
points,
but
I
think
we
can
come
around
to
a
place
where
both
parties
can
be
like
civil.
I
I
do
worry
about
like
the
long-term
success
of
staying
together
and
I
feel
like
we
might
need
to
add,
like
extra
relationship
counseling
of
some
sort,
but
we
didn't
get
to
that.
We
didn't
really
get
to
discuss
it.
Tim
did.
You
have
anything.
A
H
Yeah
sorry,
I
missed,
I
had
to
restart,
and
I
missed
a
little
bit
of
that
yeah.
I
thought
it
was
a
very.
It
was
an
amazing
exercise
what
you
said
about,
including
something
into
the
the
new
employment
contract
we
didn't
get
to
either,
but
that's
actually
very,
very
smart
to
avoid
future
conflict.
I
So
this
case
doesn't
present
again,
but
we
also
included
an
apology
from
star
to
hacker
for
not
recognizing
the
power
screen
potentials
in
the
beginning,
and
we
offered
a
hacker
at
25
or
we
think
both
group
of
lawyers.
We
think
that
hackers
should
get
at
25
of
the
royalties
and
yeah.
I
think
that
that
was
it.
I
don't
know
if
libya
mateo
wanna
have
something
else.
H
I
thought
it
was
interesting
by
listening
to
everyone's
case
is
how
jorge
was
so
given
at
first
that
made
us
not
want
to
push
that
much.
It
was
like
oh
yeah,
that
sounds
great
actually
and
then
I'm
thinking
now.
If
there
was
more
of
a
push,
if
that
would
have
incentivized
a
more
fair
and
like
very
thought
out,
solution
should
come
up.
C
A
We
have
there
one
question
to
you
guys
on
the
restraints
of
on
choice:
did
you
get
to
think
what
was
going
to
be
the
the
most
common
criticism
you
may
receive
on
the
agreement.
I
I
I
think
we
didn't
actually
get
there,
but
if
stood
thinking
fast,
the
I
think,
maybe
the
easier
criticism
would
be
that
we
gave
too
much
royalties
to
hacker.
Maybe
15
of
20
would
have
been
enough,
but
yeah.
We
didn't
really
get
that
that
far.
A
I
wanted
to
keep
my
relationship
and
keep
my
company.
So
yes,
it's
important
also
to
prepare
always
like
a
quick
response
to
a
most
common
criticism.
Okay,
we're
going
to
go
to
jake,
jeff
and.
A
I
J
I
had
to
have
some
notes,
so
we
had
we,
we
didn't
maybe
get
quite
as
far
along
as
some
of
the
groups,
but
we
have
a
couple
potential
options.
One
is
to
propose
a
buyout.
J
And
then
admit
that
we
didn't
acknowledge
the
value
of
the
product,
but
that
our
need
to
properly
market
existing
products
interfered
with
our
ability
to
appreciate
it.
I
J
Loves
and
then,
if
that's,
if
we
can't
come
to
an
agreement,
then
just
let
the
venture
capital
buy
out
and
and
give
up
control
but
get
paid.
But
I
don't
think
that's
what
the
hacker
wants.
E
E
If
we
can't
live
in
the
same
house,
then
some
somebody
might
have
to
buy
the
other
person
out
and
go
their
separate
ways
that
we
were
trying
to
like
yeah
just
get
get
to
the
core
needs
which,
like
another
group
said,
was
like
the
acknowledgement
was
so
big.
So
like
it,
like,
you,
said
juan.
Maybe
you
know
it
doesn't
need
to
go
as
far
as
a
lawsuit.
Just
sometimes
people
want
to
feel
heard
and
acknowledged
and
the
communication
wasn't
there.
A
Yes,
this
shows
that
there
is
not
one
way
to
solve
this
conflict.
A
buyout
is
also
like
a
possible
a
possible
exit
to
the
conflict,
and
it
it's
not
bad.
A
It's
not
really
bad,
but
I
I
want
to
to
ask
on
this
like
like
this
tool
that
we
had
like
what,
if
the,
what
if
I
say,
no,
what
if
the
other
part
says
no
to
to
that
proposal,
you're
going
to
go
to
to
litigation
or
wha
or
what,
because
it's
also
really
important,
always
to
ask
ourselves
what,
if
the
other
part
says
no.
E
A
Expensive,
okay-
and
I
I
am
going
with
the
last
group
that
is
with
metaverde,
decentralized,
sdg
and
rafael.
How
did
you
guys
go
just
to
to
have
this
last
move.
K
Then
we
try
to
analyze
the
strengths
and
weaknesses
of
both
sides
and
came
to
conclusion
that
you
know
there
were
each
side
was
going
to
come
in
with
thinking
you
know
fully
to
their
strengths,
but
I
think
then
we
tried
to
see
some
of
the
potential
weaknesses
that
if
it
went
to
litigation
or
arbitration
that
it
might,
it
creates
sort
of
an
uncertainty
for
either
party
and
to
mitigate
that
uncertainty.
K
We
were
looking,
then,
for
common
solutions,
and
we
discussed
at
least
what
you
know
what
could
be
shared
sort
of
like
if
you're
thinking
about
a
divorce?
What
what
then
is
the
joint
custody?
K
K
So
you
make
very
clear
in
the
settlement
agreement
as
to
what
the
sort
of
the
terms
of
divorce
are,
what
the
sharing
of
that
software
could
look
like
only
what
was
developed
at
that
moment,
sort
of
a
shared
use
and
then
maybe
moving
on,
but
this
is
about
where
we.
This
is
where
this
is
at
least
my
one
view.
Maybe
other
colleagues
want
to
share
their
views.
Thank
you.
D
Yeah,
it
didn't
seem
like,
in
spite
of
being
starr's
attorney
reading
through
the
employment
agreement
carefully.
I
think
he
should
have
had
me
draft
it
and
not
whatever
fly-by-night
guy.
He
had
do
it.
It
doesn't
say
anything
about
intellectual
property
in
the
agreement,
so
it
was
really
difficult
for
me
to
negotiate
heavily
for
him
and
what
we
did
managed
to
come
away
with.
D
Was
that,
since
my
client
is
so
incredibly
unhappy
with
making
a
profit
in
software
his
first
four
years
in
business
and
thinks
that
he
should
be
like
mooning
with
it,
somehow
it
and
thinks
that
somehow
two
products
are
enough
in
four
years
that
you
can
tell
I'm
a
little
prejudiced
here
that
I
was
going
to
talk
with
my
client
and
convince
him
that
he
should
be
happy
with
having
the
rights
to
use
the
latest
software
that
hacker
had
developed
like
we
weren't,
even
sure
if
it
fell
into
the
if
it
was
even
covered
under
the
employment
degree
agreement,
because
it
had
to
do
with
software
controlling
other
devices
or
something
I
don't
have
the
exact
wording
in
front
of
me.
A
Well,
if
rafael
wants
to
say
something,
I
want
to
say
some
finishing
remarks
on
the
exercise
and
also
yes,.
A
Okay,
now
I
hope
everyone
has
enjoyed
this
exercise
this.
These
role
plays
are
really
important
into
the
formation
and
the
training
of
mediators,
and
the
idea
of
gravitons
is
to
be
able
to
do
this
exact
same
work
that
we
did
today
like.
A
Maybe
if
there
are
two
people
that
are
having
a
conflict
and
that
they
don't
have
a
a
good
communication
between
themselves
like
we
as
gravitons
representing
them,
can
like
get
into
agreements
and
and
propose
things
to
benefit
the
best
of
them
all
and
to
like
calm
and
keep
to
help
people
keep
calm
and
building
bridges
to
like
make
good
decisions
and
and
and
good
negotiations
and
foster
the
well-being
of
our
communities.
A
So
with
that
said,
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
coming.
A
I
will
be
sending
the
plots
by
dm,
and
also
I
want
to
invite
you
all
to
the
next
week
session
that
we
are
going
to
have
libya
leading
it
and
talking
us
a
little
bit
about
soft
gob
and
of
off
strong
principles,
and
why
are
they
so
important
in
in
in
the
well-being
of
communities
and
in
the
for
the
endurance
of
common
pool
resources?.