►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
Okay,
so
yeah,
I
am
going
to
start
this
call
thanks
everyone
for
joining
and
yeah
thanks
everyone
for
for
being
in
the
graviton
training.
This
is
our
10th
session,
so
that
means
we
will
end
this
training
today.
A
Yeah
I
was
just
saying
that
today
is
is
the
last
session
of
the
groudon
training
and
yeah.
I
am
super
happy
about
how
it
has
been
going.
A
I
hope
that
you
have
enjoyed
this
training
and
that
this
is
not
the
last
thing,
but
actually
this
is
a
starting
point
if
you
want
to
collaborate
more
into
gravity
or
if
you
want
to
actually
mediate
conflict
or
if
you
just
want
to
apply
the
the
skills
that
that
you
learned
here
in
your
everyday
life
yeah.
A
That's
that's
just
the
starting
point,
but
for
the
agenda
for
today
I
have
two
things
that
I
want
to
do
and
one
is
to
talk
about
the
pops,
because
I
know
that
there
has
been
a
little
bit
of
of
of
problems
with
the
claiming
of
the
pops,
and
I
would
really
want
to
know
like
what
is
the
the
actual
state
where
we
are
with
them,
and
also
in
the
case
that
there's
a
major
like
leak
of
pops,
that
the
actual
participants
don't
have
them.
A
A
So
well,
I
I
do
things
today
yeah.
The
first
thing
is
to
talk
about
the
pops
and.
A
A
So
my
idea
is
that
everyone
jump
into
this
spreadsheet
and-
and
please
double
check
that
you
have
claimed
your
pops
like
yeah
here
you
can
see
session
one
session
two
session
three
session
four
session,
five,
so
yeah,
please
check
that
you
got
your
pops
and
some
of
them
have
already
been
claimed
by
by
bots.
A
So
if,
if
you
click
the
link
for
your
pop-
and
it
says
that
it
has
been
already
minted-
please
dm
me
because
I
will
make
a
list
of
people
who
is
missing
yeah
the
pops
to
see.
How
can
we
fix
that.
C
Question
should
we
write
like
next,
like
there's
the
the
the
like
sort
of
the
tick.
If
someone
minted
it
or
like
basically,
the
tickets
it
was
sent,
but
maybe
the
people
could
that
miss
another
co-op
could
write
next
to
their
name.
Just
missing
and
or
like
I
don't
mind
what
you
write,
you
can
also
write
a
nice
message
or
a
story
or
put
a
star
there,
but
just
sort
of
mark
your
name
with
the
pull-ups
that
are
missing
next
to
your
name,
that
that
won't
be
super
super
helpful,
because
I
think.
C
D
In
case,
it's
helpful,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
every.
A
Yeah,
so
the
the
pod
for
the
session
nine,
they
were
all
claimed
by
bots.
So
like
I
think
that
session
nine
is
the
one
that
will
have
the
most
missing
links
and
like
people
don't
being
able
to
claim
but
yeah,
please
eight
and
eight
so
yeah,
please.
A
If,
if
you
have
any
problems
like
write
like
this
like
missing
in
in
the
session-
and
we
will
try
to
fix
that
mostly
this
problem
happened
between
session
eight
and
session
nine
and
the
pop
for
session
ten.
I
will
just
paste
it
here
in
this
call,
so
that
you
can
make
the
live
claim
and
we
can
get
ahead
of
the
bots.
A
So
I
I
in
in
session
10
I
will,
I
will
be
adding
the
the
the
links
just
now
and
yeah.
The
idea
is
that
you
can.
Please
write
your
your
name
next
to
the
to
the
link
that
you
used
for
for
claiming
so
yeah
right
now
you
can
make
the
claim
of
your
pops
here
in
session
10.
E
Yeah,
I
wanted
to
say
something
some
folks
have
noticed
that
if
you
don't
climb
claim
your
co-ops,
you
won't
get
them.
They
have
a
shelf.
F
E
A
E
I've
been
trying
to
help
someone
and
they
had
a
hard
time
doing
it,
saying
that
they
were
no
longer
able.
A
A
To
to
to
be
in
order
with
that,
so.
D
A
A
Sorry
there
were
two
people
talking
at
the
same
time
and
I
and
I
couldn't
understand
I
I
heard
durga's
and
the
voice
of
a
woman,
but
I
didn't
recognize
it.
D
This
is
morgan,
identifies.
D
A
No,
no,
no
you
can
you
can
like
this
is
my
my
pop
thing
and
I
already
claimed
the
10
of
them
but
like
if
you
click
for
an
example
in
this
you
can
see
the
collection
and
when,
when
you
open
the
collection,
you
you
you
can
see
all
the
the
the
the
claims
that
that
were
done
on
this
pop.
A
D
A
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
like
them
in
in
x-day
and
in
maine.
They
charge
you,
but
all
of
these
I
think
they
they
were
minted
in
in
xdi,
okay,
yeah,
this
this
one's
in
particular
so
yeah.
If,
if
the
link
expired,
please
write
next
to
the
link
expired
if
the
link,
if
the
link
was
already
claimed
like
in
session
nine,
please
write
missing.
A
The
git
coin
guys
asked
us
to
have
a
mediator's
phone
book.
It's
not
necessary
to
give
your
number
your
your
cell
number
or
but
like
just
putting
your
your
your
username,
your
discord
handle
if
you
want
to
be
enough
in
a
phone
book
of
mediators
in
for
for
dows.
A
The
idea
of
having
this
is
that
I
understand
that
this
training
is
is
very
general
and
that
not
all
of
you
want
to
actually
mediate
in
conflicts.
Some
of
you
just
want
to
learn
about
conflict
management
to
apply
it
in
your
everyday
life.
A
So
I
don't
so
I
I
like.
Maybe
you
can
be
a
graviton,
but
you
just
want
to
have
it
for
yourself
and
you
think
that
maybe
mediating
in
conflicts
would
add
like
more
work
to
you
and
you
feel
that
your
load
is
enough.
So
I
don't
want
to
have
like
all
gravitons
being
mediators,
so
so
yeah
the
people
that
would
like
to
participate
in
this
mediator
list.
A
Please
you
can
say
your
name
or
write
it
directly
in
the
spreadsheet,
because
we
will
share
this
with
the
bitcoin
guys,
and
the
idea
also
is
that
we
have
a
lot
of
people
from
different
communities
here,
and
one
of
the
things
that
would
be
really
good
to
do
in
these
next
days
is
to
make
clusters
and
to
say,
like
okay,
we
are
going
to
be
the
gravitons
on.
A
I
don't
know.
Search
grid
and
okay,
x,
y
and
and
c
are
going
to
be
the
gravitons
that
will
that
are
participating
in
git
coin
or
or
yeah.
These
two
or
three
people
are
going
to
be
participating
in
gibbet,
and
these
two
or
three
people
are
actively
participating
in
proof
of
humanity.
So
that
way
we
can
have
like
clusters
from
gravitons
in
different
communities
and
yeah,
that's
something
that
will
be
really
cool
to
do
after
in
these
next
sessions.
A
Also,
I
want
to
say
that,
even
though
the
training
is
is
is
finalized,
today,
we
will
steep.
We
will
still
keep
meeting
in
the
same
hour
on
tuesdays
but
to
coordinate
on
the
working
group,
so
it
will
be
like
a
a
weekly
working
group
called
mostly
about
coordination,
and
we
will
still
continue
the
nbc
book
club
until
we
finish
with
the
book,
and
this
week
we
will
be
going
over
chapter
number,
nine
of
the
non-violent
communication
book
club,
so
every
everyone
is
invited.
I
think
that
the
book
has
14
chapters.
A
So
after
the
the
we
end
that
book
club,
we
will
decide
as
a
group
if,
if
we
will
decide
as
a
group,
if
we
want
to
continue
meeting
on
tuesdays
or
if
we
want
to
move
to
thursdays
or
other
schedules
so
yeah
on
that
on
that
issue,
we
will,
if
you
want
to
continue,
collaborating
with
us.
A
G
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
just
say
that
we're
planning
on
trying
to
create
other
things
to
continue
broadening
skills,
for
example
like
practice
groups
where,
instead
of
just
talking
about
the
book
in
nvc,
we
actually
practice
and
come
up
with
things
out
of
the.
So
there
are
other
things
that
we're
planning
as
we
transition
into
the
gravity
dial
side
of
the
thing
too.
So
just
please
leave
your
suggestions
and
also
don't
forget.
We
have
a
get
coin
grant
going
up.
So
please
pay
attention
to
that.
Thanks.
A
Yeah
yeah:
this
is
our
git
coin.
Grant
it's
not
yet
active.
It
will
become
active
in
round
number
12.
But
if
you
want
to
support
us,
you
are
invited-
and
we
have
this
gnosis
safe-
that
currently
has
zero
tokens
in
it.
A
But-
and
currently
I
am
the
only
participant
in
the
multisig,
but
the
idea
is
that
we
we
make
a
committee
that
will
actually
distribute
and
manage
the
funds
that
we
will
receive
as
a
sadao,
based
also
on
the
on
the
funding
proposal
that
we
are
do
that
we
want
to
do
for
the
for
for
the
tc.
A
The
idea
is
that
we
can
have
rewards
for
people
that
mediate
in
conflicts,
but
we
can
also
have
rewards
for
people
that
make
trust
building
activities
and
that
we
can
also
make
rewards
for
for
different
types
of
contribution
so
yeah.
This
is
another
creative
part
that
is
going
to
start
right
after
this
graviton
trading
that
we
will
need
to
decide
who
are
going
to
be
the
custodiers
of
this
of
this
multisig
and
yeah.
A
We
will
try
to
receive
funds
both
from
bitcoin,
both
from
making
offering
our
services
to
other
dows
and
also
with
the
funding
proposal
from
the
tc.
That
will
be
like
our
kickstarter.
A
And
yeah
on
that
side
is
there
any
question
any
comment.
A
For
the
for
the
multisig,
the
only
thing
that
that
I
am
want
to
require.
That
is,
that
the
participants
have
to
have
the
title
of
graviton,
meaning
that
they
finished
either
the
first
training
or
the
the
second
one
and.
A
It
yeah
I
I
like,
I
really
wanted
to
be
on
it
too,
but
we
are
going
to
have
a
participatory
process
and
the
idea
is
that
I
am
going
to
make
a
forum
post,
like
the
one
that
says
of
the
initial
buy.
A
And
the
idea
is
that
we
can
have
like
nominate
five
people,
and
then
we
vote
on
these
nominations
so
that
it's
not
like,
even
though
that
durgadus-
and
I
are
like
coordinators
of
of
gravity
like
I-
I
don't
want
it
to
be
like
imposed
like
these-
are
the
people
that
have
to
be
there.
And
I
want
to
be
more
of
a
participatory
process
so
like
having
a
nomination
and
then
we
vote
on
them
and
for
five
people.
E
B
A
Well,
we
that
that
can
also
be
done
yeah
this
this.
This
is
not
like
rock
solid.
I
am
going
to
make
a
post
and
have
an
advice
process
like
what
would
be
the
best
way
to
manage
this
multisig.
It
can
be
good
the
way
that
that
septic
says
it
like
one
graviton
one
boat,
or
it
can
be
also
like
a
committee
of
gravitons
that
idea
that
septi
gave
I
really
really
liked
it
so
yeah,
it's
something
that
we
will
be
have
to
be
figuring
out
in
this
in
the
next
days.
B
I
was
saying
it
more
to
both
in
the
committee
like
like
the
thing
is,
like
you
know
like
how
are
you
going
to
make
this
boat
like?
If
you
use
tc
tokens,
then
there
might
be
a
lot
of
private
engine
here?
Who
I
mean
this
gravity
thing
is
just
getting
started
and
I
think
it's
good
like
yeah
there's
just
people
like
they
don't
have
tc
tokens
and.
A
A
What's
it
called
doodle.
A
One
of
these
voting
tools
that
that
allow
us
to
have
like
one
one
person,
one
boat,.
C
We
can
also
do
that,
for
example,
with
a
bottom
discord.
There's
like
very
nice
voting
bots
on
discord.
So
it's
also
like
a
super
centralized
process
in
terms
of
just
where
it
is
where
it's
happening
instead
of
going
on
another
like
it's
super
visible,
you
could
put
it
to
the
discord
channel
and
use
it.
So
there's
many
ways
of
doing
that,
and
you
could
actually
also
verify,
for
example,
that
if
someone
holds
a
pro
up,
they
can
actually
vote,
which
is
also
a
pretty
neat
feature.
A
Okay,
that
that's
amazing,
yes,
that
that's
the
type
of
coordination
that
we
need
and
actually
like.
I
I
created
the
multisig,
but
if
the
results
of
the
boat
end
up
saying
that
I
am
not
in
the
in
the
in
the
committee,
if
we
end
up
having
a
committee,
I
will
just
like
yeah
pass
the
permissions,
and
I
will
retire
myself
from
from
from
the
multisig.
A
So
it's
not
like,
I
have
to
be
there
or
it's
more,
that
we
want
it
to
be
like
a
participatory
process
and
the
the
brainstorming
that
we
have
done
here
is
is
really
great.
So
I
think
that
that
we
will
be
good
in
in
moving
into
that.
That
point.
A
But
getting
to
the
mid
of
this
session,
I
don't
want
to
finish
the
the
graviton
training
without
having
a
role
play.
I
love
role
plays,
and
I
think
role
plays
are
good
for
practicing
conflict
management,
so
we
will
be
doing
this
role
play.
I
will
share
this.
This
link,
it's
already
posted
in
the
in
the
gravity
text
channel,
but
I
I
will
repost
it
again,
and
this
is
a
role
play
based
in
three
roles.
A
A
So
what
we're
gonna
do
is
that
we're
going
to
divide
in
groups
of
three
and
yeah
we
are
going
to
have
people
that
is
going
to
be
the
department
chair,
people
that
is
going
to
be
the
the
physician
and
people
that
is
going
to
be
the
mediator
and
we
will
split
into
into
breakout
rooms
and
and
have
this
activity,
it's
not
necessary
that
we
have
groups
of
three.
A
We
can
make
groups
of
six
like
two
people
being
the
department
chair
and
two
people
being
the
physician
researcher
and
two
people
being
the
the
mediator
so
yeah.
I
am
going
to
explain
the
case.
It's
it's
really
really
easy,
but
it
can
go
a
lot
of
different
directions
and
I
I
also
like
this
case,
because
there
are
other
cases
that
have
more
of
an
adversarial
position,
but
this
is
a
case
that
that
has
no
adversarial
positions
and
it's
mostly
like.
A
How
can
you
solve
this
situation
and
it's
a
lot
of
the
conflicts
that
we
have
in
in
gravity?
Not
all
of
them
are
like
with
adversarial
positions.
Some
of
them
are
just
like
coordination,
things
and
like
how.
How
can
we
communicate
better?
So
I
liked
this
case,
and
it
is
like
there's
a
superstar
professor,
who
continues
to
take
on
significant
new
commitments,
despite
being
overextended,
a
department
chair
who,
while
not
wanting
to
diminish
his
academic
superstar
value
to
the
university,
is
concerned
about
another
new
grant.
A
He
or
she
wants
to
take
on
as
principal
investigator
and
an
administrator
who
is
trusted
colleague
of
the
department
chair
and
provides
a
willing
ear
for
how
to
approach
this
conflict
so
yeah,
it's
it's
really
easy
one,
and-
and
this
is
something
we
also
see
in
the
space-
a
lot
like.
We
don't
know
how
to
measure
our
loads,
and
we
sometimes
tend
to
overload
when
we
try
to
give
ourselves
some
issues
to
do
with
overload
with
them,
and
we
don't
know
how
much
is
the
right
amount,
and
this
case
is
about
this.
A
It's
about
someone
who
maybe
wants
to
do
a
lot,
but
as
as
as
peers.
Sometimes
we
we
think
that
it
it's
better
when
when
the
loads
are
distributed
and
yeah
there,
there
are
the
description
of
the
roll
is,
is
here
below
so,
depending
on
on
the
role
that
that
you
choose.
You
have
to
read
this
information
and
to
yeah,
make
the
theater
like
get
into
that
skin
and
and
play
that
role
so
yeah.
A
I
will
try
to
split
the
group
and
then
we
will
start
the
the
exercise.
The
idea
is
that
in
this,
in
the
split
groups,
we
can
first
study
the
role
and,
and
then
we
make
the
the
other,
the
other
breakout
rooms
where
we
will
do
the
activity.
A
So
initially
we
just
need
three
groups.
I
will
have
like.
A
People
that
that
that
I
am
really
close
to
like
being
the
leaders
of
of
of
one
group
so
levy,
could
you
be
the
leader
of
of
the
group
from
that
will
play
the
department
chair.
E
A
Okay,
so
yeah,
please
jump
to.
I
don't
know,
parameters
or
another
voice,
channel
and
people
who
want
to
play
the
department
chair
can
jump
with
living.
A
Yeah
yeah,
it's
the
the
the
role,
the
the
character
description.
It's
really.
D
B
H
All
right,
so
the
character
is
the
department
chair,
and
so
you
are
a
chair
of
the
neurology
department
at
a
large
academic
medical
center.
You've
spent
the
last
few
years
trying
to
keep
your
superstar
physician
researcher
happy
as
she
is
always
letting
you
know
about
offers
she
receives
from
other
prestigious
universities.
H
H
Typically,
she
has
students,
post-docs
and
others
who
work
for
her
labs,
covering
many
of
her
academic
duties.
The
sponsored
projects
office
has
brought
to
the
attention
of
the
provost
the
dubious
effort
reports
she
has
submitted
and
the
provost
has
asked
you
to
look
into
the
matter
because
they
fear
she
would
not
pass
muster
with
federal
auditors.
H
You
are
especially
concerned
now
that
she
has
emailed
you
that
she
will
stop
by
to
have
you
sign
off
on
her
proposal
to
be
principal
investigator
on
the
new
nih
institutional
research
training
grant,
which
would
admit
four
trainings
per
year,
requiring
her
supervision
and
guidance
so
yeah.
I
think
that
our
superstar
researcher
is
overextending
herself
she's
playing
fast
and
loose,
and
her
effort
report
might
indicate
that
she's
not
performing
well,
that's
what
I
kind
of
got
out
of
that.
E
I
think
I
would
also
add
that
it's
a
risk
for
our
institution
to
to
have
this.
What
is
the
word?
I'm
looking
for
potential
liability
in
terms
of
the
responsibilities
for
how
we
do
our
research
and
the
results
that
we
have.
So
I
think
that
the
biggest
concern
is
that
there's
a
liability
for
our
institution.
H
Yeah
and
since
the
provost
of
the
said
that
the
effort
reports
she
did
submit
were
kind
of
dubious,
so
basically
meaning
she
just
you
know,
she's
kind
of
exaggerating
on
the
accuracy
of
of
that
effort
report.
H
Yeah,
so
I
think
we
have
like
what
three
things
that
are
really
important:
it's
a
it's
a
risk
to
the
institution,
she's,
a
liability
for
other
she's
having
a
lot
of
people,
do
the
work
for
her
and
she's
kind
of
exaggerating
and
lying
on
her
effort
report.
So
those
are
three
major
concerns
that
we
have
with
this
character.
E
H
I
think
we'll
know
when
we
get
back
in
there.
I
think
kind
of
just
understanding
our
character
and
knowing
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
and
what
we're
trying
to
convey
to
the
researcher.
E
But
I
think
this
chair
of
neurology
department,
let's
say
she's
a
she
and-
and
she
has
spent
the
last
few
years
doing
all
of
the
super
hard
work
for
those
other
superstar
researcher.
To
be
happy-
and
let's
say
this
is
a
he
and
he
has
been
like
promising
you
offers
in
universities
and
supporting
valuable
programs,
but
he
has
been
like
loose
with
his
responsibilities
right.
Do
we
have
an
understanding
on
that
because
before
I
was
confused,
so
there's
two
people
here.
E
C
I
think
we
go
back
to
the
room
and
then
basically
discuss
like
like
one
or
two
showcases
and
then
go
into
some
more
smaller
groups.
A
E
A
You
are
gonna
play
the
department
chair,
there's
the
there
is
the
two
other
roles,
one
is
the
superstar
researcher
and
the
other
one
is
the
is
the
mediator.
A
So
basically,
you
are
concerned
that
the
superstar
researcher
is
overloading
himself
with
work
and
you
think
that
if
he
or
she
assumes
more
responsibility,
then
the
quality
of
of
their
work
may
be
affected
and
also
because
there
are,
there
are
audits
of
of
of
of
of
the
way
that
the
workload
is
is
is
distributed
and
for
the
researchers,
and
you
are
concerned
that
if
this
principal
researcher
has
another
another
grant,
maybe
that
that
will
be
something
that
can
be
reported
in
an
audit.
A
So
your
idea
is
what
what
your
position
is
is
that
you
will
try
to
look
for
solutions
with
the
mediator
and
with
the
researcher.
A
To
to
to
see
like
yeah,
if,
if,
if
he
or
she
would
agree
to
be
the
secondary
researcher
of
the
grant,
and
also
how
can
you
express
that
concern
that
you
have
of
the
quality
of
the
job
being
affected
by
the
amount
of
load
that
that
that
he
or
she
is,
is
carrying.
E
A
Yeah,
we
are
understand
you,
you
are
the
department
chair,
chewie
and
the
others
are
the
administrator
and
dingo
and
brittany
are
the
superstar
researchers.
So
what
we're
gonna
do
now
is
that
we
are
going
to
split
into
the
groups
where
we
will
have
the
mediation
so.
A
What
we
are
going
to
do
is
that
we
are
going
to
have.
A
I
am
going
to
first
tell
the
people
that
that
are
the
superstar
researchers
to
to
to
jump
into
different
into
different
voice
channels.
A
B
H
So
they're
gonna
break
into
a
bunch
of
different
rooms,
so
dingo
yinsley,
brittany
and
miss
mcgay
they're,
going
to
beat
the
role
of
the
superstar
researcher
and
then
the
next
group
is
going
to
break
out
into
different
rooms
and
then
we're
going
to
break
out
into
different
rooms.
So
one
of
the
four.
F
H
H
A
Hey
everyone,
okay,
so
the
groups
are
in
communitas
here.
How
many
people
do
we
have
here.
A
Okay,
we're
gonna
split
in
couples
and
each
couple
is
going
to
jump
into
either
communitas
transparency,
commons
and
softcup.
F
Researcher
so
then
we
need
somebody
who's
going
to
be
the
department
chair.
F
F
Okay,
very
cool-
I
guess
I'm
the
only
one
that
is
in
the
was
in
the
the
physician
researcher,
one
okay,
cool.
H
All
right
and
so
morgan
are
you
the
the
administrator?
Is
that
correct.
H
F
D
H
D
Yeah,
and
as
far
as
I
understand
from
one,
I
think
that
we're
gonna
get
a
unique
prompt.
D
Well,
because
these
scenario,
one
and
scenario
two
is
like,
as
if
like
the
department
chair
and
I
had
had
like
lunch
together
and
we're
chit
chatting
about
stuff
yeah.
I
saw
that
as
far
as
I
understand
kind
of
like
the
role
of
the
administrators
for
me
to
kind
of
like
offer
to
both
the
the
director
and
the
physician
researcher
around,
like
you
know,
kind
of
like
what
consequences
are
you
all
tending
to
considering
how
far
stretch
the
physician
researcher
has
done
and
what
are
the
concepts.
D
There's
so
much
in
here,
they're
like
study
it
in
five
minutes,
figure
it
out
and
then,
like
the
tense
of
the
questions
that
we're
supposed
to
ask
ourselves
like
flipped
roles
twice
and
like
what
the.
E
D
One
of
the
scenarios
so
director
you
have
asked
a
fellow
administrator,
the
trusted
colleague,
myself.
Aloysius
has
my
sidekick
to
have
lunch
away
from
campus,
so
we
can
discuss
how
to
best
approach
the
situation
with
your
physician
researcher
superstar,
professor,
so
brittany,
you're
here,
but
not
here
so
pop
in
with
your
ego.
F
H
H
So
the
problem
is,
is
that
she
has
continually.
H
It
is
kind
of
exaggerated
almost
to
the
point
where
it's
lying,
you
know,
and
and
for
me
that's
that's
a
huge
issue
and
we're
taking
a
big
risk
as
an
institution.
By
allowing
this
to
happen-
and
I
just
kind
of
want
her
to
you-
know,
take
less
of
a
role.
I
know
she
wants
these
things
and
she
wants
to
get
the
new
grant.
H
But
for
us
it's
just
kind
of
it's
a
it's
a
high-end
risk
for
us,
and
so
we
want
to
try
to
prevent
her
from
over
overworking
her
post-docs
and
her
students
that
she's
working
with
and
making
sure
that
she's
actually
doing
the
work
that
she's
doing
and
there's
some
accountability
there.
So
that's
that's
the
problem.
From
my
perspective,.
D
Yeah
and
in
your
conversations
with
brittany,
do
you
have
any
sense
on
what
driving
is
driving
her
behavior.
H
No,
I
mean
you
know
she's
she's,
very
she's,
very
aggressive
for
the
notoriety
that
comes
with
being
an
all-star
researcher
and
she's
constantly
reminded
us
that
you
know
she's
had
offers
from
other
institutions
and
using
that
as
leverage
to
keep
getting
the
work
from
us.
That
we
have,
and
so
part
of
me
thinks
is
just
kind
of
this.
H
You
know
wanting
to
to
to
be
the
best
in
in
her
field,
which
is
not
a
bad
thing,
but
at
times
it
gets
frustrating
to
manage
that
because
she's
always
just
leveraging
that
against
us,
and
so
I
really
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I
would
like
her
to
not
be
in
charge
of
this
grant
and
possibly
delegate
it
to
another
researcher.
D
H
Yeah,
it's
a
tough
one,
because
I'm
afraid
that
we
will
we
may
lose
her.
And
the
thing
is:
is
that
I
I
don't
want
to
sign
her
effort
report
because
I
I
do
think
it's
false
and
that
that's
kind
of
the
the
big
basis
of
what
we're
what
I
want
to
prevent
like.
We
need
to
go
over
the
fact
that
some
of
these
these
claims
and
her
effort
report
are
just
fabricated.
D
So
you're,
like
between
the
ten
us
options
of
taking
on
the
liability
of
her
stretching
her
limits,
but
then
also
you
lose
the
the
assets
that
she
brings
to
the
table.
Have
you
all
had
a
conversation
about
like
you
know
what
those
layers
of
vulnerability
are
so
that
at
least
it's
been
spoken
to
in
a
transparent
way,
and
she
knows
what
the
consequences
are
if,
like.
H
H
Yeah
we
haven't,
we
haven't
done
that
at
all,
and-
and
the
thing
is,
is
that
you
know
most
of
our
relationship
has
been
based
on
her
trying
to
leverage
more
work
and
get
more
grants
through
the
institution,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
how
that
would
pan
out
or
the
consequences
that
will
fall
out.
And
I
we.
H
H
H
Oh
man,
so
let's,
let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
this
report
from
the
application,
the
nih
we
have
to
go
over
see.
This
is
where
I'd.
D
D
Okay,
so
nate,
thank
you
so
much
for
for
bringing
in
this
conversation
to
make
sure
that
brittany
is
held
in
great
care
by
this
department
and
that
their
work
is
being
validated
and
also
that
you
all
can
work
together
in
a
streamlined
way.
D
F
D
F
D
Let
me
repeat,
or
just
kind
of
keep
going,
nah
keep
going.
Okay,
so
we're
here
to
have
a
conversation
to
figure
out
how
to
best
support
you
in
the
work
that
you're
offering
the
department
and
also
to
sort
of
look
through
a
little
bit
of
the
pieces
of
the
contract
or
the
application
that
you
put
forward.
Maybe
to
bring
someone
to,
and
I'm
trying
to
hold
some
space
to
make
sure
that
you
both
are
healing
each
other
and
getting
your
needs
met.
F
Well,
I
mean
I
really
was
just
expecting
to
come
here
and
have
them
sign
off.
I
mean,
as
we
already
know,
I
am
the
principal
investigator
already
of
two
large
nih
program,
so
I
wasn't
really
expecting
that
there
would
be
much
to
talk
about
what
what
seems
to
be
the
issue.
H
F
The
effort
report
correct-
can
I
can
I
ask,
what's
concerning
about
that.
I've
been
delegating
to
my
medical
students,
various
duties
and
things
that
need
to
be
done,
and
I've
never
had
a
problem
with
that
before.
So
you
know,
as
you
know,
I
direct
a
course
for
medical
students.
F
I
have
many
different
trainees
and
you
know
I
I
travel
often
I
have
a
lot
of
things
going
on,
and
so
I
delegate
different
aspects
of
the
effort
reports
to
them
and
I
trust
their
ability
to
be
able
to
come
up
with
correct
reporting.
So
I
mean
what's
the
issue
now
so
a
long
time.
H
Yeah,
it's
the
effort
report.
The
the
federal
auditors
come
in
and
make
sure
that
the
the
compensation
that
we're
giving
you
is
is
reflected
within
your
different
roles,
as
a
teacher
as
a
researcher
as
a
public
service,
administrator
and
other
university
related
activities
and
we're
because
you've
taken
on
so
much
research
work
that
you
have
kind
of
delegated
too
much
of
the
work
to
others.
H
And
the
effort
report
that
you
had
submitted
indicated
that
you
had
been
doing
almost
all
of
this
work
and
we
we
find
that
to
be
find
that
hard
to
believe
with
the
amount
of
student
and
postdocs
that
have
been
turning
in
work
for
you.
And
so
it's
really
hard
to
justify
that
type
of
risk.
When
a
federal
auditor
comes
in
order
to
actually
justify
giving
you
this
new
grant.
F
Well,
I've
gone
through
many
federal
investigations
before
and
I've
come
out
winning
on
all
of
them.
So
you
know
I'm
not
new
to
this,
and
you
know
I
can
100
percent
back
the
effort
reports
that
they
are
true
and
accurate.
D
So
what
I'm
noticing
is
there's
a
bit
of
discrepancy
between
the
two
of
you
all
and
I'm
wondering
if
it
might
be
beneficial
to
like,
maybe
get
into
some
of
the
minutia.
D
We
don't
have
these
details
sidebar,
but
to
get
into
the
minutia
of
what
the
what
the
responsibilities
of
the
university
are,
that
we're
being
held
to
and
be
able
to
like
near
it
as
honestly
to
the
work
that
brittany,
you
are
bringing
to
the
table,
because
we
like
deeply
respect
you
and
your
kick
ass
research
and
we're
super
thankful
for
what
you're,
bringing
and
also
it
seems
like.
There's
some
discrepancies
around
like
what
the
university
needs
to
show
and
they
don't
feel
like
they
can
show
it
at
this
time.
D
F
Absolutely
I
I
have
no
problem,
you
know
kind
of
going
through
the
details
of
how
I
delegate
and
how
the
numbers,
how
we
come
to
them
to
make
sure
that
you're
comfortable
with
the
reports
that
I'm
giving,
because
I
do
understand,
because
I
have
been
through
many
federal
audits
before
that
it
is
important
that
all
the
the
details-
the
minutia,
as
you
said,
is
exact
so
that
you
can
get
through
these.
These
federal
audits,
clean
and
clear.
H
F
Well,
you
know,
I
recently
got
a
divorce
and
I've
got
all
the
time
in
the
world
to
devote
to
this
project.
I'm
very
focused
and,
like
I
said
you
know,
I've
got
already
two
nih
underneath
my
belt
that
I've
been
running
for
a
while,
and
I
feel
confident
that
I
am
the
perfect
person
to
be
the
principal
investigator
for
this
particular
grant.
F
Well,
absolutely
you
know,
I'm
I'm.
I
got
a
divorce.
You
know
based
upon
being
able
to
allocate
all
of
my
time
to
my
research
and
as
we
know,
I've
got
many
opportunities
to
go
other
places,
and
I
really
have
my
heart
set
on
this
particular
project.
So
you
know,
like
I
said,
I'm
willing
to
sit
down
and
go
over
the
details,
the
minutiae
to
make
sure
that
you're
comfortable,
but
you
know
after
I
do
that.
F
I'm
expecting
to
be
able
to
add
this
to
my
my
list
of
nih
projects
underneath
my
belt.
I've
deserved
it
and
I've
earned
it.
H
You
have,
and
we
value
you
tremendously,
but
there's
there's
one
aspect.
That
is,
that
it
kind
of
it
kind
of
sets
up
this
conflicting
area
where
you
know.
We
know
how
valuable
you
are
but
to
be
operating
under
these
these
guidelines
and
these
restrictions,
and
knowing
that
you
can
use
this
as
leverage
to
get
other
offers
from
universities,
and
things
like
that,
makes
it
very
difficult
for
us
to
make
decisions
about
this,
because
we
do
value
your
research
and
your
expertise.
F
F
F
But
I
do
have
you
know
a
wanting
to
have
this
particular
project
and
I've
put
a
lot
into
making
sure
that
I'm
in
a
position
to
be
able
to
to
do
the
work
so
yeah
you
know,
unfortunately,
if
that's
how
you
feel
I
apologize,
but
inevitably
I
do
have
these
other
offers
and
if
I
don't
get
what
I
want
here,
then
I'm
obviously
going
to
go
somewhere
else.
D
E
F
A
Yeah,
what
was
the
the
the
agreement
that
that
you
did.
B
A
Yeah
was
there
a
different
alternative
that
other
groups
reached
reached
to
it.
A
And
did
someone
continue
to
to
have
the
superstar
as
the
principal
researcher.
C
No,
I
think
we
offered
or
like
in
our
group
the
physician
was
offered
to
to
help
others
and
supervise
them,
because
he
has
like
outstanding
skills
and
that
this
will
also
be
good
for
his
reputation
and
yeah.
That
was
the
compromise
and
and
that
he
steps
back
but
helps
others.
A
A
This
exercise
was
also
fun
because
it's
it's
a
thing
that
we
see
every
day
and
not
all
conflicts
are
actually
adversarial
positions,
so
some
of
them
are
just
coordination
issues,
and-
and
it's
it's
good-
that
we
can
have
practice
to
to
to
manage
this
kind
of
scenarios
that
when
we
leave
it
as
a
role
play,
we
we
can
also
learn
for
our
for
our
own
practice
in
our
everyday
life.
A
So
well
not
with
with
nothing
more
to
say
from
my
side,
I
will
just
say
thank
you
all
for
coming
for
joining
the
the
graviton
trainings
and
that
I
hope
to
see
you
very
soon
and
to
stand
to
stay
close.
If
you
want
to
say
something,
the
the
the
mic
is
open.
I
Yes,
I
I
echo
that
quanka
and
it
just
made
me
really
happy
when
you
were
like
doing
some
retrospective
on
on
gravity
and
and
some
of
the
goals
that
you
had
for
the
second
graviton
training
and
how
all
those
expectations
were
met.
And
it
was
like
beyond
that,
when
it
was
so
enriched
by
so
many
people
that
that
could
make
it
for
for
the
second
training.
So
yeah
raise
the
bar
for
the
third
one.
I
I'm
pretty
sure
the
gravity
dial
will
reach
its
goals
and
thank
you
and
congratulations
for
this.