►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
12:19 - ABC feedback
14:51 - TEC Convert
31:45 - EVM Crispr
34:50 - One time change addresses
40:55 - Governance giveback
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
D
A
A
So
for
me
it's
an
nft
called
scammer.market.
That
is
song.
Stems
I'm
really
excited
about
this
because,
like
nfts
are
going
to
be
really
powerful
in
remix
culture
and
the
musician
who
made
the
this
nft,
you
know
a
song
stem
is
like
a
beat
or
a
little
hook.
So
these
are
like
three
to
40
seconds
of
music.
A
Then
they
built
an
interface
that
lets
you
like
put
nine
nfts
in
a
grid
that
you
can
use
your
keyboard
to
make
a
new
song
with
and
like
I'm
just
excited
about
nfts
and
remix
culture,
and
this
is
the
first
like
I've
been
waiting
for
something
like
this
to
appear.
So
I'm
excited
about
that
intentions,
for
this
call
are
make
sure
that
we
are
moving
towards
the
commons
upgrade
very
excited
about
that.
We're
getting
super
close
and
no
distractions
from
my
side
this
week
and
I
will
pass
it
to
zeptimus.
C
Thanks
bradley
yeah,
my
intentions
is
just
to
sing
with
you
guys,
and
I
also
have
a
big.
We
have
to
make
a
heart
style:
boat
yeah
I
was
I
wasn't
with
sam.
I
know
he
got
everything
ready,
but
yeah.
It's
sadly
grief
is
not
here.
We
will
vlog
because
yeah
the
trusted
seat
gardeners
still
do
not
confirm
the
addresses
but
yeah,
I
I
I
mean
just
to
check
it
in
like
if,
for
the
common
swarm
site,
it's
everything.
F
G
G
H
You
can
really
program
what
the
token
will
will
be
doing.
It's
like
you,
you
can
configure
the
the
flows
at
any
time,
so
so
really
excited
about
this
and
intentions
for
the
call
I
would
like
to
especially
the
update
of
this
week.
From
my
side,
this
I've
been
touching
a
lot
the
crispr,
and
I
would
like
to
do
a
demo
with
the
newest
things,
using
the
the
example
of
morning
and
minting
tokens
for
the
addresses.
H
J
Hi
everyone,
my
intentions
for
this
week,
is
checking
with
you
thinking
with
you
and
report.
My
latest
work,
which
is,
has
been
basically
working
on
the
crisper
and
finishing
the
the
test
for
the
connector
and
the
for
the
forward
function,
which
is
which
is
the
like.
The
last
feature
that
we
need
to
test
so
yeah.
J
A
E
Hey
hello:
I
am
here
trying
to
sync
up
and
find
a
place
that
I
can
help
out.
I'm
excited
about
the
gardens
and
commons
swarms
and
the
gal
interface
that's
being
built
and
extraction
is
like.
Oh
there's,
google,
it's
my
distraction
is
just
personal
life
blowing
up
but
happy
to
be
here
and
I'm
not
sure
who
to
pass
it
to
so.
If
you
could
take
it.
A
B
B
I
B
A
Did
we
hear
from
everybody
else
just
want
to
make
sure
lost
track?
Okay,
so
yeah?
Let's
move
on
to
progress
check-in.
So,
let's
see
we've
got
feedback
feedback
from
the
abc
on
at
the
stand-up.
Last
thursday
I
mentioned
that
this
week
I
could
probably
pick
up
some
work
addressing
sokai's
feedback
on
the
abc.
H
H
M
A
F
Yeah,
well,
it's
going
it's
it's
going
forward.
I
think
it's
looking
great
and
we
are
yeah
fabio
and
pedro
are
hard
at
work.
The
back
end
is
mostly
running
by
now.
I
think
vitor
wanted
to
finish
the
the
github
generation
between
like
until
thursday,
I
think
or
wednesday.
So
that
will
be
also
it's
also
it's
all
on
track.
Actually
we
just
you
know
making
some
some
issues
about
stuff.
We
see
that
have
to
be
corrected,
but
it's
it's
it's
on
track.
F
F
I
I
wouldn't
feel
comfortable
saying
anything.
I
don't
know
enough
to
to
say
that
I
know
we
are
testing
now
with
the
with
the
actual
like
not
with
the
figma
anymore,
but
the
actual
product
and
kind
of
iterate
over
that.
But-
and
I
mean
the
plan
was
to
have
it
finished
by
october.
I
think
so
and
I
think
it's
going
fine
so,
but
I
can't
I
don't
feel
comfortable
saying
more
than
that.
Of
course,.
A
H
F
Yeah,
I
actually
also
tried
it
a
bit.
Well,
it's
working
in
winky
be
it's
working
the
deploy.
I
forget
and
updated
everything
to
the
last
point
and
wrinkybee
was
working
extire
wasn't
I
don't
know
exactly
why,
because
it
should
be,
it
should
kind
of
recognize
it,
but
yeah
like
in
in
the
code.
It
says
that
it
when
you
check
the
network,
there
is
the
corporation
for
x-style,
so
I
don't
know
exactly
why
that
could
be
maybe
something
to
look
into
and
yeah.
F
I
was
away
this
weekend,
so
I
wasn't
really
able
to
get
a
lot
of
work
done
on
the
issues
I
wanted
to
solve.
Also
I've
seen
that
my
limited
react.
Knowledge
is
at
the
end
there,
so
I
was
kind
of
more
like
doing
some
tutorials
to
see
why
the
thing
I
thought
was
going
to
work
wasn't
working
and
I
planned
to
to
kind
of
spread
it
out
this
week,
but
yeah.
That's
that's
from
my
part
how
it
stands.
H
Okay,
I
think
that
I
it's,
it
has
been
a
lot
of
times,
so
I
don't
remember
completely,
but
the
latest
thing
is
that
I
just
deployed
it
on
rinkevi,
so
into
kv
was
working
and
next
time
probably
the
latest
version
of
the
convert
is
not
compatible
with
what
we
have
right
now
in
next
day.
I
thought
there
is
some
real
money
in
that
house
which
we'll
check
out,
because
there
was
around
3
300
bucks
or
something
like
that.
H
H
I
I
hope
that
this
this
week,
I
can
just
focus
more
on
this.
In
this
part,
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
freaking
out
is
that
the
ac
lotta
calls
in
in
the
garden's
house
was
not
working,
so
it
was
like
yeah,
but
we
are
depending
on
those
in
order
to
be
able
to
vote
so
I
was
just
researching.
Why
was
why
wasn't
it
working,
and
why
did
the
hatch
work,
but
the
gardens
are
not
working,
and
how
can
it
be
that
the
difference
of
who
can
it
be
the
this
book?
H
H
So
this
is
why
I,
I
was
just
checking
out
this
part
in
regards
of
that.
We
know
that
the
common
security
is
at
this
point.
It's
done,
but
we
cannot
test
it
because
of
this
difference
in
version
and
drinking.
So
two
options
are
opening
up.
One
is
to
redeploy
aragon
entirely
in
drink
heavy,
which
I
don't
think
that
it's
worth
it
from
our
side.
H
We
could
also
check
that
everything
is
fine
and
go
forward,
but
I
I
would
prefer
doing
a
just
a
test
and
I
think
that
that
would
be
the
next
step.
Just
do
not
do
it
on
ringer.
We
do
it
or
next
time
it's
a
beauty,
because
it's
it's
going
to
add
some
random
things
into
xd
gardens,
but
we
cannot
there's
this
particular
thing
in
in
drinking
at
the
moment.
H
L
H
L
H
H
L
A
H
H
H
H
H
H
D
H
H
H
H
H
E
H
H
H
H
E
E
H
H
A
J
Fetching
stuff
ipfs
during
the
test-
and
this
can
be
quite
a
problem
because
so
many
times
we
had
like
too
many
requests
an
error
from
the
server
or
maybe
the
state
that
we
were
using
to
run.
One
of
the
tests
was
already
updated
from
the
previous
test,
so
it's
better
like
to
have
a
new
state
for
every
test,
and
basically
I
was
working
on
improving
the
the
way
we
do
this
by
using
a
local
state
with
dummy
data,
and
the
other
thing
that
I
was
talking
about
was
basically.
J
Finishing
the
the
test
for
the
connector,
which
is
basically
a
piece
of
software
that
allows
us
to
fetch
data
from
the
arragon
subgraph,
so
we
needed
to
do
the
test
for
that,
and
also,
as
I
was
a
as
I
was
saying
earlier,
the
forward
function
so
for
this
is
better
like
to
fork
the
blockchain
using
some
of
the
functionalities
that
hard
hat
offers
and
tests
that
everything
works
correctly.
So
I
hope
that
I
can.
I
think
I
can
have
all
this
for
today
and
with
that
we
have
we.
J
H
H
H
Before
that,
you
have
to
do
this,
this
way
evm
crease
pair,
install
new
and
now
it
is
way
easier
because
you
just
have
to
know
which
are
the
commands
and
you
can
use
it
like
in
a
terminal,
install
application
and
use
this
parameter
on
this
parameter.
Grant
this
to
this
entity,
this
permission
and
all
of
this,
so
it's
an
another
way
to
to
write
it,
which
is
much
much
easy
to
understand
as
well,
because
you
can
see
here
that
you
want
to
install
a
token
manager
with
this
particular
token.
H
H
2K
tokens
from
this
address
and
it's
going
to
mint
the
same
amount
into
this
others.
It's
going
to
work
from
this
address
this
amount
and
it's
going
to
mint
into
this
others.
This
amount
and
it's
going
to
burn
and
mint
this
amount
from
these
others
to
this
address
and
because
the
the
votes
cost
1
000
dice.
H
H
H
H
C
A
A
G
E
G
E
G
H
B
O
E
B
I
H
B
A
D
D
D
First
of
all,
like
I'm
biased,
because
of
the
way
I
I
I
I
had
like
very
like
strong
opinions
against
praisewand
and
about
like
what
originated
the
the
the
context
of
this
boat
and
the
second
one
is
that
I
might
not.
I
may
not
be
like
technically,
very
like
accurate,
but
anyway
I'll
I'll
just
tell
it
in
in.
I
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
see
if,
if
I
can
have
some
feedback,
but
yes
well.
D
I
didn't
really
support
the
pre-squad
proposal
back
then,
like
I
didn't
really
like
the
part
of
people
like
agreeing
to
something
and
then
just
I
feel
that
the
praise
system
got
improved,
but
at
a
high
cost,
which
was
like
a
strong
part
of
our
cultural
build.
So
anyway
the
community
decided
to
go
with
it,
and
so
I
mean
we
we
all
must
like
go
with
it.
D
At
some
point,
however,
when
this
proposal
came
by
asking
to
give
like
people
75
of
their
governance,
I
mean
I
I
found
it
fair
like
it
came
from
a
good
point.
However,
when
I
started
reading
about
this
proposal,
spinning
spinning
around
like
non-transferable
tokens,
that's
when
I
that's
when
a
a
red
light
came
up
for
me,
because
I
really
really
don't
support
like
non-transferable
governance
tokens.
I
just
I
just
put
myself
in
in
that
place.
D
You
know
if,
if
I,
if
I
approached
the
dao
and
I
found
that
they
had
like
some
interesting
proposals
and
community
and
ideas,
if
I
found
out
that
there
was
like
a
certain
percentage
of
the
total
token
supply
or
that
that
has
like
this
voting
power
and
it's
non-transferable,
I
I
I
really
don't
think
that
goes
with
it's
just
like.
I
feel
that
it
doesn't
fit
and
in
a
way
taking
this
taking
this
decision.
D
On
top
of
everything
like,
I
feel
that
it's
like
a
domino
effect
that
doesn't
really
go
with
with
the
way
we
like
take
decisions
and
and
in
the
end
I
feel
that
it
it
it
affects,
like
democracy,
might
be
like
a
bigger
word,
but
yeah
like
the
the
way
we
we
we
make
decisions
in
the
community.
I
feel
that
it's
affected
by
this,
and
I
don't
agree
with
voting
power
being
like
not
non-transferable
because
of
because
of
this.
G
G
And,
but
also
this,
this
boat
is
to
signal
support
to
start
developing
the
the
the
solution,
but
the
detailed
implementation
should
be
like
supported
by
the
commons
upgrade
and
detailed
by
the
commons
upgrade
so
yeah.
It's
not
like
a
final
step
with
this
boat.
It's
it's
the
the
the
step
to
to
start
materializing,
some
technical
solution
that
would
but
yeah
I
for
sure,
understand
and
respect
your
point
of
view
and
yeah.
That's,
I
want
to
say
well.
H
It's
it's
not
final,
but
because
nothing
is
being
executed,
but
actually
it
is
the
moment
in
which
this
thing
is
voted,
because
when
we
do
the
commands
update
the
commands
operator
is
going
to
be
in
one
sense
or
the
other.
I
mean
right
now.
It's
not
going
to
those
tokens
are
not
going
to
be
minted,
but
if
this
board
passes
in
the
commands
upgrade
these
bro,
these
tokens
are
going
to
be
in
the
final
down
people
vote
in
the
command
upgrade.
H
B
F
So
you
know
at
the
beginning,
when
the
hatch
upgrade
happens,
they
have
full
voting
power
with
their
tokens,
but
those
tokens
voting
power
becomes
less
the
more
time
passes.
So
if
they
don't
continue
to
contribute
to
the
dow
and
get
more
or
buy
more
tokens
or
kind
of
yeah
kind
of
get
involved
in
the
actual
dow
in
the
future
years,
their
voting
power,
which
is
giving
now
to
compensate
for
the
switch
equity
in
the
past,
gets
less.
I
would
I
was
asking
something
like
that.
H
Well,
actually,
it's
not
this
argument
that
it's
tweety,
it's
not
if
you
keep
your
tc
tokens
for
all
your
life,
you
are
also
going
to
have
governance
token
all
the
time.
So
this
is
not
exactly.
I
don't.
I
don't
think
that
this
should
be
actually
the
point.
The
point
is:
are
those
tokens
legit
or
not.
H
B
E
D
I
just
have
concerns
like
behind
this.
I
I
feel
that
it
creates
like
some
kind
of
hierarchy
right.
It's
like.
Oh,
I
have
more
voting
rights
than
you
because
I
was
here
before
and
but
but
I
mean
it
shouldn't
be
like
something
that
that
counts.
I
mean
that
I
feel
that
that's
what
that's
what
a
poep
is
for.
You
know
like
we
called
cat
poe
said
yeah,
we
were
hatcher,
but
I
don't
feel
that
it
should
spin
around
like
governance,
yeah.
E
E
I
don't
understand
why
we
can't
just
create
a
different
token
for
governance
and
distribute
it
like
to
everybody
and
then
just
let
the
pc
tokens
that
we
already
have
just
be
like
a
financial
thing.
I
don't
understand
that,
but
I
know
there's
a
reason
I
mean
I
don't
know
how
to
mix
it
up
and
make
it
reasonable
in
any
way.
C
Yeah,
I
also
don't
think,
go
look
at
governance,
it's
you
know
it.
It
goes
against
the
freedom
of
people
selling
it.
You
know
like.
I
really
don't
like.
Also
look
at
you
know
like.
If
people
want
to
leave
a
place,
they
should
be
free
to
leave
at
any
moment
and
give
that
covenant
to
someone
else
that
wants
to.
C
K
C
E
I
don't
know
if
we
have
abstain
proposals
in
the
tec,
but
a
real
problem
in
one
hive
is
a
lot
of
people
got
a
lot
of
tokens
early
on
before
honey
gained
a
lot
of
value,
and
now
we've
got
this
abstain
proposal.
That's
got
some
insane
amount
of
money
locked
in
it
when
there's
not
a
lot
of
people
actively
using
their
honey
for
governance,
and
it's
just
really
really
hard
to
get
anything
passed
and
the
risk
we
run.
E
If
we
have
people
that
are
permanently
locked
into
their
tokens
that
they're
going
to
drop
them
like
if
we
have
an
abstain
proposal
or
something
to
that
effect,
they
can
just
drop
their
tokens.
There
go
away,
I
mean
go
to
the
bahamas.
Forget
we
even
exist.
You
know
and
then
we're
stuck
with
this
governance
block.
H
E
B
There's
a
side
effect
to
that
that
I'll
point
out.
It
might
not
be
a
major
issue,
but
if,
if
we
have
tokens
that
are
sellable,
we
will
no
longer
be
eligible
for
git
coin
grants
and
historically,
we've
received
a
substantial
amount
from
the
bitcoin
grant
program.
Go
they.
They
have
a
no
quid
pro
quo
rule
and
no
monetary
tokens.
If
there's
a
monetary
token,
their
person
is
not
eligible
for
bitcoin
grants.
That
may
be
a
concern.
F
Think
I
kind
of
get
what
you
mean,
but
I
think
that
we
have
like
this
old
system
with
the
bonding
curve,
and
that
is
kind
of
the
point
is
to
have
something
which
is
self-sustaining.
So
I
guess
the
idea
would
be
that
when
we
have
the
tc
commons
running,
we
don't
really
need
git
grants,
because
the
tc
works
by
itself
with
this
economic
system
with
the
particular
buying
minting
selling
burning-
and
I
think
the
experiment
is
actually
that
so
yeah.
That's.
M
F
That's
kind
of
why
what
me,
with
with
the
kind
of
we
have
this
great
system
which
works
this
way,
and
then
we
have
this
little
other
bunch
of
tokens
which
are
like
separate,
but
do
the
same.
That's
kind
of
the
that's
why
I
said:
that's
why
I
mentioned
the
vesting,
but
I'm
I'm.
I
don't
have
a
clear
opinion
on
this.
Actually
so.
H
H
A
Well,
this
discussion
is
really
valuable
and
I
don't
want
to
end
it
prematurely,
but
I
have
to
go
to
a
different
call,
so
I
just
want
to
point
out
to
finish
the
the
business
side
of
the
call.
I
I'm
happy
to
see
some
new
faces
here.
It's
great.
We
were
working
on
an
effort
to
clean
up
the
board
before
I
ran
into
some
health
issues,
but
now
that
I'm
back
hoping
that
we
can
make
it
easier
for
new
folks
to
figure
out
how
to
contribute.