►
From YouTube: W5 Tech Spec WG: Reviewing issues and IH formula
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - what's your favorite dinosaur?
04:10 - Intencions of the call
05:58 - Griff goes over the board to review issues starting with funds from 1hive
08:20 - Min and max goal
08:55 - Impact hours conversion
09:22 - Finish hatch smart contract
10:58 - Launch demo rehearsal of full test
14:05 - Integrate the new apps in the template
21:10 - Adapt the Hatch frontend to new contract
22:02 - Task assignments
36:19 - Dandelion smart contract
42:55 - Feedback on IH formula
51:18 - Closing
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Should
we
begin
with
intentions
or
distractions?
I
think
that
we
we
can
do
something
else
this
week.
Maybe
I
loved
a
question
in
the
com
in
communication
group.
That
was
what's
your
favorite
dinosaur
and
in
my
case
I
like
the
ones
that
fly,
because
it
was
like
it's
the
precursor
of
the
verse.
You
know
and
I'm
going
to
pass
it
to
safety.
B
B
C
Okay,
jake
interesting
opinions,
maybe
start
a
forum
post
about
it,
see
what
everyone
thinks.
Okay,
so
yeah,
I'm
gonna
stick
with
the
same
one.
I
said
last
time:
it's
the
prototaxadies.
No,
let's
see
prototaxitis,
which
is
ancient
giant
mushrooms
that
were
giant
like
trees
and
they
don't
exist
anymore,
but
there's
fossils
of
them.
So
that's
my
favorite
dinosaur
and
I'll
pass
it
over
to
paulo.
F
G
I
H
F
A
I
also
wanted
to
know
what
were
your
intentions
for
this
call
from
my
site
if
we
can
grab
now
a
kind
of
quick
agenda
from
my
site,
what
we
can
do
is
because
we
have
also
done
here
where
we
are
right
now
and
what
are
we
going
to
do
this
week?
That's
one
the
second
one
is
and
where
we
are
personally
each
one.
What
what
can?
What
are
we
doing
and
how
and
if
we
need
some
help
or
something
from
the
group
to
give
the
space
to.
A
A
Thank
you
for
for
the
for
the
funding
that
that
was
worth
it,
but
I
think
that
we
are
also
going
to
need
some
more
funds
if
we,
because
the
other
meanings
that
we
have
to
to
fund
the
project
is
be
bitcoin,
but
we
are
not
receiving
so
much
money
from
from
bitcoin
and
yeah
the
idea.
The
idea
is
to
request
more
funds.
Grief
was
saying:
let's
request,
150
more
honey.
H
H
A
H
H
A
Yeah,
it's
done
and
viewed
on
it
and
I
ready
we
done
and
we
have
it
done.
The
only
thing
is
that
we
have
to
deploy
it
in
the
we
have
to
integrate
it
into
the
template
and
deploy
it,
which
will
take
some
more
time.
But
I
don't
know
whether
the
moment
to
close
it
or
just
leave
it
open,
because
there's
two
things:
no.
H
A
A
A
A
A
H
H
H
H
H
A
A
Yeah
motherless,
maybe
maybe
pablo,
can
take
on
the,
but
the
problem
is
that
it's
it's
something
that
is
in
air.
You
cannot
do
one
thing
before
you.
You
have
the
the
bigger
one
kind
of
it's
more,
it's
more
or
less
the
same
issue,
but
we
we
are
splitting
it
up
very,
very
much.
But
at
the
same
it's
it's.
It's
all
the
same
to
work
in
the
in
the
hatch.
E
Want
to
know
how
to
integrate
the
impact
hours
formula
to
the
hatch,
but
I
can
discuss
that
with
some
on
a
private
meeting
or
something
but
yeah.
I
think
I
can
do
it
with
with
some
help.
I
know
I
will
need
some
feedback
from
sam
with
the
latest
update
on
the
on
the
hatch
changes,
but
but
I
think
I
can
do
it.
E
E
H
E
H
H
A
H
H
In
fact,
one
thing
is,
I
guess
the
hash
tribute
sounds
like
that's
going
to
be
part
of
a
later
thing,
so,
like
defining
some
of
these
things
that
we
have
to
actually
include
into
the
template
like
we
have
to
separate
out
all
this
conviction,
voting
and
and
augmented,
bonding
group.
Stuff
too,
I
guess
that's
easy,
but
maybe
not.
A
J
A
H
H
H
H
A
G
G
Then
I
tried
to
to
publish
the
library
in
the
npm,
but
I
faced
that
paolio
already
created
the
the
organization
on
npm,
so
I
couldn't
so
paulo
this
morning.
Added
me
to
the
organization,
so
I'm
ready
to
publish
the
the
the
project
as
a
library,
so
anyone
can
use
it
with
an
npm
command
so
that
from
that
site
take
you
is.
Is
it
ready
and
my
my
goal
for
this
week
is
to
work
on
the
original
task
that
you
assigned
me?
G
A
G
G
G
A
A
G
G
A
A
G
A
A
A
G
H
A
J
G
F
A
H
H
H
A
I
think
that
we
are
going
to
use
the
same
one.
The
idea
with
that
was
to
modify
a
little
part.
So
when
you
vote,
you
don't
block
everything
during
two
weeks,
you
vote
only
the
tokens
that
you
have
been
voting,
because
the
problem
that
we
have
right
now
with
dandelion
is
that
imagine
you
vote
with
one
token
and
then
you
received
another
token
because
you
buy
it
on
the
bonding
court
or
whatever
used.
A
A
H
H
H
A
H
H
H
Yay
sorry,
I
just
got
out
of
like
three
hours
of
doing
this,
like
I
had
one,
the
giveth
call
where
I
do
this
with
the
github
and
then
two
hours
with
the
common
stack
and
now
it
just
feels
like
it
just
feels
so
good
right
now,
I'm
gonna
just
roll
in
with
it.
Sorry
about
that
guys,
I'm
having
too
much
fun.
I
don't
mean
to
take
over
the
meeting
with
this.
H
F
J
J
A
Then
did
you
wanted
to
to
comment
something
on
the
on
the
impact
hours
formula
or
something
like
that?
I
I
you
already
said
that
you
like
it,
but
do
you
have
any
other
feedback
that
in
some
way
you
will
change
it
or
something
I
I
was
wondering
if
it
was
everything
fine.
I
was
looking
for
feedback
to
okay,
but
that
that
is
not
exactly
true
or
whatever
I
don't
know.
I
I
have
been
working
on
that,
but
I
I
I
am
not
100
sure
that
it's
it's
the
formula
that
we
want.
C
Yeah,
so
I
think
the
formula
is
really
cool
and
but
the
I
think
the
biggest
thing
with
the
formula
now
is
simply
the
complexity
of
it.
So
we
need
the
translation
so
that
everyone
can
really
understand
what's
happening,
and
I
know
even
me,
I
was
reading
through
it
and
I
don't
think
I
got
all
the
intuition
so
far.
For
example,
I
was
a
little
bit
stuck
on
the
m
parameter.
It
seemed
backwards
to
me
like
it
should
have
been
the
opposite.
C
C
I'll
go
on
the
forum
and
I'll
I'll
just
think
about
it
more
and
see
what
I
can
post
and
I,
but
I
think
all
it's
going
to
take
is
having
a
few
discussions
and
like
in
the
parameters,
call
we'll
talk
about
it
and
I
think
we'll
all
get
some
good
intuition
around
it.
I
think
that's.
The
major
thing
is
just
like
getting
everyone
up
to
date
on
the
intuition
around
it,
and
then
we
might
see
we
might
have
to
tweak
it
a
little
bit
but
but
yeah.
A
I
also
had
some
problems
with
them.
Actually,
initially,
the
m
was
combining
the
two
x,
the
two
axis
and
the
nominator
and
the
denominator,
and
the
rnm
is
the
inverse
of
the
two
initial
m's,
which
are
com,
punish
the
the
egg,
the
h,
so
it's
it's
better.
If
added
the
inverse
of
of
the
of
having
the
two
amps
are
combining
the
xs.
G
A
C
That's
what
I
I
think,
maybe
you
did
that
in
the
reciprocal,
like
you
just
described,
but
you
might
have,
I
think,
the
way
you
wrote
about
it.
You
might
have
been
writing
about
your
initial
logic,
because
I
was
thinking.
Oh,
I
think
it's
going
the
opposite
way,
so
I'll
double
check
that.
That's
that's
good
to
know,
though,
that
how
it
can
be
the
reciprocal
it
could
be
the
a
very
small
fraction
or
it
could
be
in
the
denominator.
C
H
It's
like
I,
I
feel
like
these
things
might
be
a
little
bit
too
abstract
and
we
might
be
kidding
ourselves
when
we
say
oh,
this
is
what
it
does,
because
no
it
just
tweaks
the
equation,
and-
and
we
can
just
say
this-
tweaks
the
equation,
and
if
it's
really
big,
then
it
does
this.
If
it's
really
small,
then
it
does
this
and
not
try
to
lie
about
it
being
something
real,
because
it's
not
it's
like,
like.
A
A
A
H
It's
a
great
post,
awesome,
really
nice,
it's
a
beautiful
equation.
In
fact,
I
would
I'm
curious
if
jake
has
any
objections
to
pushing
back
the
abc
conversation
and
maybe
just
having
a
quick
review
over
like
the
hatch,
the
hatch
parameters
and
dandelion
parameters
that
maybe
didn't
get
enough
play,
and
we
pushed
the
abc
stuff
for
later
in
this
conviction
voting
stuff
for
later
since,
since
we're-
I
don't
know
if
jake's
here,
but
since
we're
really
focusing
on
the
dandelion
dow
and
the
hatch
this
week.