►
From YouTube: W45 Commons Swarm WG: Updates and Bonding curve changes
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Board game
06:14 - Timeline
07:06 - Gardens
14:32 - Migration tool
15:39 - TEC Converter
18:55 - Dashboard
32:18 - Bonding curve changes
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
There
are
other
games
that
it's
a
pity
because
we
have
been
discussing
during
the
weekend
with
bradley
and
another
guy
who
was
here
called
janik
about
board
games
and
how
could
those
play
board
games
together
and
bradley
is
a
huge
fan
of
board
games.
So
it's
a
pity
that
the
day
that
this
question
is
my
ideas
he's
not
here,
but
my
favorite,
I
think,
is
katan.
A
B
A
C
Oh
sorry,
I
missed
the
except
passed
it
to
me.
I
I
think
I
also
love
settlers.
I
like
I
like
the
like
collaborative
games
too.
There's,
like
you
know
like
the
werewolf
game
or
any
of
those
games
where
you
know
it's
like
there's
like
a
spy
in
there
and
it's
like
it's
it's
kind
of
like.
I
guess
the
spy
can
win
or
you
can
win,
but
also,
I
don't
know
I
feel
like
there's
some
really
cool
collaborative
games
out
there
that
are
pretty
fun
to
play
where
it's
like.
C
D
D
Because
the
thing
is,
you
cannot
say
no,
so
if
some
guy
says
yeah,
I
was
going
to
do
that.
But
then
he
convinced
me
to
get
drunk.
You
have
to
say
yes,
okay,
I
did
that,
but
only
because
that
guy
there
had
actually
done
whatever.
So
you
kind
of
pass.
The
bug
and
it's
great
fun
and
yeah
I'll
pass
directly
to
wagner.
C
C
D
C
If
there's
extra
time
I'll
also
throw
something
about
snapshot
and
what
we
want
to
do
there,
okay,
well,
sam,
do
you
want
to
start
with
the
augmented
bonding?
Well,
maybe,
okay,
no,
we
start
with
status
updates,
so
we'll
leave
augmented
bonding
curve
for
the
end.
What
about
what
about
gardens?
Some,
I
think
we
found
fabry
and
x
and
gabby-
are
going
to
work
on
gardens
a
bit.
A
A
A
It
will
be
as
as
it
is
right
now
in
order
to
change
them.
You
have
to
reinstall
the
conviction,
voting
and
change
all
the
connections
that,
for
example,
the
agreement
has
or
the
hooks
it's
a
mess.
It's
it's
a
it's
really
honest
so
now
that
it's
been
updated,
let's
use
this
change.
In
order
to
add
this,
this
ability
to
change
the
request,
token
and
the
state
token
we
could
include
the
inc-
include
the
bolt
as
well
the
common
pool
ladders.
A
C
C
Yeah,
absolutely
it
makes
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
So
then
the
idea
would
be
that
that
that
would
get
included.
So
like
the
the
effectively,
I
could
tell
people
that
for
the
75
percent
stuff
the
governance
give
backs,
we
will
have
we're
working
to
get
the
precursors
needed
into
the
smart
contracts
before.
C
C
A
C
A
C
C
A
And
the
other
changes
are
changing
the
parameter.
I'm
sorry,
I
changing
the
in
the
permission
of
creating
votes
in
order
to
make
it
configurable.
So
an
acl
oracle
can
continue
it
and
only
allow
certain
amounts
of
certain
people
to
create
votes,
and
it
will
be
useful
for
right
id
nice.
Oh
that's,
cool.
C
A
A
C
C
A
The
only
thing
in
relation
to
to
the
rest
of
the
commons
update
is
we
need
to
write
tests
in
order
to
do
the
input
of
the
test
that
we
already
have
with
the
compute
in
the
common
subgrade
in
order
to
do
all
of
it
programmatically
and
make
sure
that
it
it's
working
before
we
we
do
the
demo,
but
it
should
not
take
so
long.
Paolo
already
did
most
of
the
work
he
had
it
working.
C
A
A
A
C
C
Nice,
okay,
cool
well
I'll
I'll
play
with
that,
and
I
can
add
that
to
our
community
call
great
on
the
config
dashboard.
We
are
going
to
move
to
the
winning
repo,
probably
on
tuesday
worst
case
wednesday.
We
but
there's
a
lot
of
back-end
work.
That's
that's
still
in
the
works
and
noggin.
I
actually
closed
your
pull
request
because
you
were
doing
slippage
correctly
and
that
was
the.
That
was
the
question
you
know.
C
D
D
No,
no
yeah!
No,
that
that
I,
I
saw
your
your
answer.
I
I
kind
of
made
a
new
pr
with
the
correct
slippage
and
just
the
changes
that
pedro
asked
me
but
yeah
thanks
for
bringing
that
up,
because
I
was
also
like
half
thinking.
If
the
slippage
was
right
or
wasn't
so
it's
great
that
we
have
the
confirmation
now
that
this
is
how
we
want
it
to
work.
C
Yeah,
it's
the
slippage
experience
not
like
the
change
in
the
in
from
the
transaction,
so
it
was
just.
I
think
I
think
that
with
the
with
the
tributes
being
taken
out
and
then
like
you
know
the
fact
that
it
is
kind
of
like
heavy
weighted
towards
yeah-
I
don't
know,
I
just
thought
the
numbers
looked
a
little
weird
being
one-third
about
off
so,
but
it
makes
sense.
C
C
You
know
for
sure
by
wednesday
or
worst
case
thursday,
but
none
of
th,
but
they
shouldn't
right,
like
if
you
vote
on
something
during
that
time,
it's
like
mostly
just
a
little
bit
to
get
like
people
to
see
the
that
this
is
an
interesting
proposal
to
fork
and
then
we're
really
focused,
there's
a
there's,
a
blog
post,
there's
a
forum
post
out
there.
That's
like
you
know
this
is
like
play
and
learn
right
now
for
this
period
of
time,
and
then
the
next
period
of
time
is
like
learn
and
debate.
C
So
starting
on
like
on
the
11th
or
something
like
that,
oh
man,
I
guess
I
should
get
this
post
up.
We
are.
We
will
actually
start
moving
towards
more
parameter
debates
and
that's
where
people
will
bring
their
proposals
and
they
will
discuss
whether
or
not
they
are
like.
You
know
and
they'll
present
them
and
then
they'll
be
challenged
on
whether
or
not
they're,
good
and
and
so
that'll
be
fun.
C
C
So
from
the
19th
to
the
23rd
is
when
we
would
encourage
people
to
vote
on
the
final
parameters
and
then
we'll
have
like
a
committee
just
to
certify
the
results
like
making
sure
that
there
aren't
like
forks,
that
are
splitting
votes
that
keep
them
out
of
the
top
top
four,
even
though
they
were
supported
by
the
people
and
just
kind
of
a
check
on
with
token
log.
It
doesn't
quite
work.
You
know
it's
easy
to
split
votes
and
stuff
and
and
then
to
figure
out.
C
If
we
have
three
or
five
or
three
four
or
five
proposals
in
the
runoff
and
then
and
then
we'll
have
the
runoff
and
the
runoff
will
be
will
be
settled,
it
will
will
happen
for
six
days
from
the
25th
to
the
first.
So
on
the
first
we
would
have
on
the
first
of
december.
We'd
have
parameters,
and
that
means
we'd
want
to
actually
deploy
the
safe
version,
basically
on
the
second
and
launch
this
thing
with
those
parameters.
C
That's
that's
okay.
I
mean
not
for
I
wouldn't
it's
okay,
but
man.
I
I
guess
it's
not
preferred
in
my
opinion,
because
stuff
changes
when
it's
on
x
die
right,
I
mean
like
the
block
times
change
and
and
the
x
die
deployment
is
generally
more
up
to
date
like
are
they
gonna
when
they
make
the
yeah,
I
feel
like
they
keep
the
xd
deployment
more
up
to
date,
right.
A
There
is
two
two
ways
to
to
set
up
this
demo:
one
is
having
people
playing
with
it
with
a
an
interface
and
the
other
is
running
tests
in
a
in
a
controlled,
xdi
fork
or
even
extra.
If
we
want
but
mixing
them
them
will
create,
it
will
make,
it
will
say
it
will
be
like
creating
a
garden
before
the
real
garden,
so
it
will-
and
it's
a
garden
that
then
we
cannot
change
it.
It
will
be
there
forever,
like.
C
A
C
I
know
at
least
giveth
has
a
test
gardens
deployment
on
x-die.
That's,
like
you
know,
a
different
front
end
than
the
regular
gardens
the.
I
guess.
The
the
big
thing
that
I'm
worried
about
is,
like
you
know
these
small
changes
that
will
happen
on
xdi
around
permissions
and
around
around
other
things.
C
A
So
I
don't
want
to
be
trapped
in
that
situation
in
which
a
small
change
in
the
template
in
order
to
deploy
a
new
something
we
have
to
update
the
graph.
And
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
of
effort
that
that
doesn't
pay
at
the
end
of
the
day,
because
it's
we,
we
can
do
the
same
thing
on
on
drink
heavy
or
we
can
do
the
same
thing.
Programmatically
and
check
out
that
everything
is,
is
working.
A
A
C
C
A
A
B
C
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
This
one
is
the
one
this
one
paulo
has
this
pull
request,
but
the
problem
is
that
what
we
wanted
is
a
test
that
make
sure
that
this
is
the
change
that
we
want,
basically
is
changing
the
order
in
which
we
are
burning,
and
now
the
test
passes
with
these
changes,
but
still,
how
do
we
know
if
this
is
the
correct
move
or
not?
So
we
still
need
to
check
out
if
that's
the
that's
the
way
to
go.
A
A
B
A
A
This
is
because
this
receive
approval
interface,
that
we
have
that
actually
we
are
not
using,
but
it's
if
we
are,
if
we
have
it
in
the
in
the
contract,
it's
it's
a
good
thing
not
to
remove
it
and
for
some
reason,
showcase
things
that
we
did
not
understand.
Well,
actually,
I
I
didn't
add
this
this
function
and
I
still
trying
to
understand
how
it
works.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
The
super
missions
thing.
I
think
that
it's
interesting
to
have
one
permission
to
buy
and
one
permission
to
sell,
because
maybe
we
we
want
to
let
people
let
people
with
right
id
or
whatever
to
buy,
and
we
don't
want
to
have
any
anything
any
permission
to
sell
whatever
we
can
have
it's
it's
better
that
it's
granular
in
my
opinion.
So
I
just
closed
this
issue.
A
E
A
And
we
also
could
make
we
have
made
this
before
before
opening,
but
I
mean
open,
adding
the
collateral
and
opening.
At
the
same
time,
I
think
that
it's
it's
okay,
now,
okay,
and
what
else
there
was
three
permissions
in
order
to
manage
the
collateral,
and
now
I
just
added
one.
So
we
simplify
the
permissions
here.
A
Of
the
variables,
I
think
that
it
was
done
why,
sometime
in
the
past,
by
paolo
the
we,
we
also
removed
this
initialized
check.
I
think
that
it
was
pablo
as
well
this
time
the
balance
of
there
is
this
function,
balance
off
that
I
made
internal
and
he
was
talking
about.
The
more
roles
are
important.
My
lesbian
is
highly
sensitive
as
a
warning
that
do
not
mess
up
with
the
with
the
rules,
but
it's
more
like
a
warning
by
roles:
does
he
mean
permissions,
or
what
does
this.
D
F
A
If
you
mess
up
with
one
permission,
you
are
done,
oh
god,
but
it's
it's
more
like
a
it's
more
like
a
warning,
yeah,
okay!
So
I
already
talked
about
this
three
and
now
there
are
here
two
that
were
taken
by
baby,
and
the
thing
is
that
this
message
sender
was
not
a
message
sender.
It
was
a
message
value.
A
A
A
C
C
Isn't
it
like
white
listed
tokens
as
in
the
collateral
token
I
mean
our.
Our
intention
is,
to
only
add
tokens
socially,
so
I
feel
like
this
can
just
be
a
social
check
and
it's
just
a
reminder.
A
warning
make
sure
that
it's
erc20
not
an
erc
777
token
that
can
have
tokens
taken
out
of
the
bonding
curve
or
something
crazy
like
that.
A
A
C
C
C
E
C
Yeah
yeah
for
sure,
and
it's
very
interesting
too
you
know-
maybe
it
was
right
all
along
otherwise
brett
is
goddamn
genius.
I
mean
my
god.
How
do
you
re?
How
do
you
just
pull
that
out
just
by
looking
at
it?
You
know
but
yeah
so
well.
Thank
thank
you,
sam
for
the
great
presentation
and
thank
you.
Oh
anson
and
child
shoe
thanks
for
jumping
in,
but
it's
just
the
end
of
the
call
so
and
zep.
I
would
love
to
chat
with
you
really
quick.