►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
am,
I
am
sitting
the
flat,
so
it
has
equally
as
much
energy
as
grif
does.
A
Let's
see
so,
let's
do
intentions,
distractions
and
for
intro
question
who
plays
vitalik
in
a
movie.
That
would
be
a
fun
one:
okay,
just
kind
of
piggybacking
off
the
last
weeks.
Okay,
so
intentions
for
this
call
make
sure
we're
all
on
the
same
page,
make
sure
see
what
I
can
do
to
help
out
and
see
what
is
left
until
we
officially
launch
distractions.
I
totally
goofed.
A
I
just
got
back
last
night
from
a
trip
to
la,
but
I
left
my
keys
at
a
hotel,
so
I
came
back
to
my
house
and
realized
I
couldn't
get
in
so
I
just
literally
20
minutes
ago
got
inside
my
house
anyway
and
who
should
play
metallica
in
a
movie.
I
think
I
think
something
really
offbeat.
A
No,
this
is
not
too
offied.
Actually
rami
malek
would
be
a
really
really
good
metallic
and
I
will
pass
it
to
nugget.
C
C
D
Intentions,
sketching
up
distractions.
Well,
I
rearranged
a
furniture
as
you
may
have
noticed.
So
my
my
background
is
a
little
bit
different
and
also
I
just
came
back
from
like
I.
I
took
some
dates
off
towards
the
end
of
last
week
because
of
some
health
problems.
So
now
everything
is
better,
but
I'm
catching
up
with
a
bunch
of
stuff,
so
I'll
be
a
little
bit
distracted
during
the
call
and
for
today's
question
I
have
vitalik's
character
for
something
that
that
could
be
like
a
full
transformation.
D
So
I
don't
know
if
someone
here
watched
the
the
golden
glove
or
or
something
like
this,
it
was
a
german
film
and
the
transformation
from
that
actor
was
amazing,
so
I'm
actually
thinking
of
like
a
tom,
holland
or
or
team
of
the
chalamet
or
something,
but
they
would
need
to
like
spend
eight
hours
per
day
in
in
makeup
like
something
like
that,
I
think
that
would
be
crazy,
but
yeah
really
looking
forward
to
that
film.
Actually
I'll
pass
it
to
griff.
E
That
made
me
think
of
a
second
a
second
person,
but
okay,
so
I'm
gonna
start
with
that.
So
the
first,
the
first,
the
transformation
thing
made
me
think
of
christian
bale
on
the
machinist.
I
don't
know
if
you
ever
saw
the
machinist
like
he.
You
know
it's
batman,
but
then
he
gets
like
thin
as
for
the
machinist,
and
it's
almost
scary,
so
I
think
he
could
pull
that
off.
But
I
was
originally
thinking
the
guy
from
road
trip.
I
don't
know
he's
like
a
character
in
roach.
E
E
What
went
wrong
and
also
the
conviction,
voting
stuff
that
we're
looking
at
for
giveth,
just
bringing
that
to
light
and
seeing
how
much
it
matters
or
what,
if
it
affects
tc
or
how,
where
we
go
from
there
and
as
far
as
distractions,
none
other
than
like.
Oh
man,
giveth
launch
is
coming
up
really
soon
and
I'm
pushing
really
hard.
So
I'll
probably
you
know
occasionally
be
looking
at
all
my
chats
of
developers
being
like.
What's
this
mean,
and
that
kind
of
thing
and
I'll
pass
it
to
apollo.
F
Thanks
grief,
I
was
thinking
about
dj
quals
as
well.
I
think
he
will
be
a
great
vitalik.
F
F
H
Oh
sorry,
I
had
to
pop
up
no
hey
everybody.
I
was
thinking
alexander
skarsgard.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
ever
watch
true
blood,
but
he
was
the
movie
actors
in
true
blood.
So
I
think.
H
I
think
he
might
be
a
good
good
italy,
but
in
terms
of
intentions
for
today,
just
like
last
week,
I'm
just
here
to
really
absorb
and
take
it
all
in
and
listen
and
contribute
where
I
can
and
and
in
terms
of
distractions.
I
think
I
had
a
little
bit
of
a
covet
scare,
so
I'm
waiting
to
hear
back
and
see
see
if
I
see
if
I
have
come
in
actually
just
got
a
test
done
today,
so
waiting
to
hear
back
about
that.
So
I'm.
G
Do
you
know
that
actor
from.
C
C
Yeah,
I
also
just
looked
up
the
the
brother
of
of
alexander
skarsgard.
He
is
called
bill
skarsgard
and
he's
oh
yeah.
I
think
he
would
work
also
good.
G
G
So
maybe
for
some
reason
something
went
wrong
and
we
ended
up
with
a
19
of
reserve
ratio,
because
now
it's
giving
the
correct
number
or
it's
giving
the
current
number
now.
But
when
the
vote
is
executed
and
the
initial
buy
is
made
for
some
reasons-
the
for
some
reason,
the
there's
already
changes,
which
will
not
have
any
sense.
G
G
G
It
will
take
two
days,
so
I
thought
don't
know
which
is
the
best
moment.
Maybe.
E
Thursday
to
open
it
any
any
moment
whenever
as
soon
as
it's
ready,
because
it's
got
a
much
less
quorum
and
it's
okay.
G
Okay,
this
is
the
only
thing
I
think
that
is
in
relation
to
the
the
demo.
There
were
other
minor
things,
such
as
the
amount
of
the
amount
of.
G
G
Now
we
are
implementing
it
with
buy
okay,
because
if
not
it,
we
will
be
changing
the
parameters
and
it
will
be
a
mess
yeah.
So
we
are
buying
and
we
are
moving
funds
from
the
common
pool
to
the
reserve
and
we
are
creating
tokens
that
goes
to
the
the
ball
that
it's
buying
them,
which
is
the
the
common
pool.
G
E
I
mean,
I
also
think
it's
fine
to
not
mint
them
at
all
and
just
have
the
the
the
ability
to
mint
and
burn,
but
I
understand
I
understand
also
the
psychological
challenge
of
being.
If
we
did
it
once,
then
that
opens
the
door
right
so.
E
Okay,
so
but
but
we
can,
I
think
we
can.
I,
I
think,
is
there
a
reason
not
to
mint
it
to
the
agent?
Is
that
did
you
have?
Did
you
have
a
reason
not
to.
G
No,
actually,
it
was
just
the
contrary,
because
I
think
that
these
tokens
were
were
going
to
be
sent
to
the
last
attack
multisig,
which
is
the
use
of
the
laser
diagnosis.
If
not
it's
true,.
G
G
But
at
the
same
time
I
I
question:
why
should
it
be
needed
if
we
already
have
the
the
agent
that
can
do
the
same
things
than
the
multisig?
G
It's
it's
just
a
question
for
maybe
it's
something
that
was
not
in
in
the
discussion,
so
I
just
I
am
just
telling
it.
E
E
It's
supposed
to
go
through
conviction,
voting
so
having
like
a
dow
voting
funding
like
votes
because
like
if
the
laser
tag
multistick
gets
that
much
money,
then
that's
like
a
lot
more
than
what
conviction
voting
should
be
able
to
can
really
manage,
and
so
we're
just
gonna
use
snapshot
vote.
Instead
of
of
doubt,
voting.
G
Okay,
so
because
we
have
this
mechanism
that
we
can
buy
for
some
for
somebody
else,
we
we
will
be
using
it.
We
we
will
use
it.
The
common.
H
E
Yeah,
oh,
that's
awesome!
Oh
yeah!
I
also.
I
also
just
think
this
is
kind
of
like
you
know.
It's
dealer's
choice,
sam
on
and
I
think
you
can
just
simply
decide
because
it
it's
such
a
edge
case
fallback
solution.
You
know
that
that
is
not
likely
to
even
need
to
be
used.
So
it's
like.
Do
we
put?
How
much
is
it
like
400
tokens
or
something.
G
E
No,
no!
No!
No!
No.
I
mean
more
for
the
this
fallback
plan,
where
we
have
to
have
mint
extra
tc,
just
in
case
the.
E
Loses
their
keys
in
that
like
10
minute
window?
In
that
one
small
edge
case,
we
have
to
mint
some
tec
and
how
many
tc
do
we
have
to
make.
E
Okay,
so
four
thousand
dollars
in
tec,
considering
that
it's
a
1.5
million
dollar
economy,
I
mean,
if
that
goes
to
the
laser
tag.
Multisig
or
it
goes
to
you
know
an
agent.
I
think
it's
relatively
irrelevant.
G
Okay,
probably
we,
we
are
not
understanding
everything.
Okay.
What
septi
was
saying
is
that
we
are
buying
2,
150,
50
000.
G
E
G
E
It's
not
going
to
be
smooth,
but
it
could
be
done.
I
I
think
the
I
think
it's
I
think
at
this
point,
though.
Second
guessing
our
our
community
decisions
is
not
very
useful.
I
mean
we
there,
it's
not
it's
like
whether
it
could
be
done
better
or
in
a
different
way.
Sure
it
could
be.
Bitcoin
could
have
15
minute
block
times,
but
or
could
have
five-minute
block
times.
You
know
it's
like
okay.
Well,
you
know
here
we
are,
it
has
10
minutes.
Let's
move
on.
G
Okay,
one
of
the
things
I
did
not
mention
at
the
beginning-
I
I
don't
know
which
topic
do
we
have
to
talk
about
today.
I
have
an
extra
one.
B
G
Okay,
maybe
we
have
to
start
talking
about
finishing
common
swarm
and
which
is
the
way
in
which
we
can.
G
I
was
expecting
to
do
some
kind
of
party
in
in
like
three
weeks
from
now
or
something
like
that.
But
it's
not
it's
something
that
it's.
What
are
we
going
to
do
during
all
these
all
these
weeks?
Maybe
we
have
to
pause.
G
E
G
Oh,
and
there
was
something
else
we,
the
voting
code,
was
opened
and
then
closed.
Oh
really,
I
don't
know
if
you
saw
that,
no,
no,
it's
it.
It
also
happened,
but
it
it.
It
is
close.
Now
we
have
had
many
many
many
problems
with
them
it.
G
It
has
not
been
a
clean
one,
but
still
we
we
go
back
and
go
back
and
go
back
and
now
we
are
finally
opening
it
and
everything
is
with
all
the
changes
we
are
in
in
the
in
the
correct
place-
and
I
guess
finishing
this
demo
finishing
the
article
on
the
avm
crispr,
give
a
final.
G
E
G
Okay,
and
in
order
to
so
how
much
more
times
do
we
met
again?
I
I
think
that
we
should
talk
about
this.
E
I
mean
I
can
facilitate
a
party
if
we
just
get
a
doodle
going,
invite
it
to
all
the
people
you
know,
and
then
we
pass
it
around
and
it's,
like
everyone,
tell
one
story
about
the
comments
forum.
You
know
or
something
like
that,
and
it's
like
byob
drinker
bring
your
own
drinks,
you
know
and
we
we
laugh
and
okay.
You.
A
A
G
And
yeah
and
and
other
board
games
like
we
have,
we
had
to
talk
about
diplomacy.
Really.
Yes,
we
do.
B
We
do
for
sure,
okay,
when
let's
talk
about
that
out
of
the
swarm.
G
After
no,
I
am
talking
about
the
the
party
of
the
swarm
party,
the
party.
E
So
the
the
the
launch
probably
won't
happen
until
mid-january,
oh
well,
then
I
I
think
we're
we're
going
to
wait
until
after
the
to
do
the
voting
well
after
the
like,
there's
like
your
holidays
in
europe
around
the
6th
of
january,
so
we're
just
gonna
skip
the
holiday
season
as
they
call
it
and
do
the
votes
right
after
that.
G
Yep,
so
let's
have
this.
A
I'll
I'll
work
on
that,
I
can
get
the
scheduling
going
stuff
like
that
and
make
sure
that
we
have
a
good
discord
party
agenda
going.
I
don't
know
I
like
daily
okay.
G
Maybe
we
can
do
that
the
same
week
that
the
launch
is
done
and
that's
it
also.
The
the
launch
is
going
to
be
along
one
week,
because
we
we
need
to
vote
on
the
dow,
the
hotel
and
then
do
probably
one
week
vote
on
on
the
opening
on
the
voting
corps.
So
during
this
week,
which
is
not
after
before,
because
there
is
not
a
one
single
time
for
the
launch
in
between.
G
E
Okay,
so
we
covered
the
party
we
covered.
What
went
wrong
with
the
demo?
For
the
most
part,
we
covered
the
the
minting
of
tokens
into
the
agent
versus
the
multi-sig,
I'm
sorry
for
being
so
confused
about
which
tokens
we
were
talking
about
minting
and
then
do
you
have
any
other
topics.
Some
I
have
the
one
that
we
were
discussing
in
the
dm
the
bright
bright
dial
dm,
which
one
the
fact
that
the
parameters
seem
a
little
bit
off
on
the
ui
of
conviction.
Voting,
okay,.
G
You
can
consider
it
as
an
estimation
actually
for
the
time
that
it
requires
you
are
doing
a
a
a
division
of
different
logarithms.
It's
it's
all
an
estimation,
and
this
should
be
taken
as
an
a
different
project
to
solve
this
or
to
improve
conviction
voting,
which
is
a
a
project
that
I
would
like
to
to
take
do
a
conviction
about
inversion
2.
G
H
E
E
This
is
a
different
issue,
but
then
I
put
in
exactly
as
many
tokens
as
was
asking
for
and
now
you
can
see
that
the
bar
is
like
way
past
the
line-
and
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
this
a
problem
with
the
ui
or
is
this
a
problem
with
our
the
way
that
we're
picking
putting
the
parameters
in
or
is
it
a
problem
with
the
smart
contract
or
where?
Where
is
the
problem?
Where
is
the
problem.
G
One
is
for
the
minimum
threshold
and
the
other
is
for
the
half-life
or
the
commission
growth.
So
the
exactly
the
maximum
amount
of
conviction.
I
I
don't
know
which
is
the
name
now
the
what
we
used
to
call
beta.
This
is
exactly
the
same
in
the
smart
contract
and
in
the
parameters
spending
the
spending
limit
is
going
to
be
always
correct,
and
if
we
have
a
problem,
it's
with
transforming
the
means.
The
nuclear
myth
mean
conviction.
G
E
Yes,
totally
yeah,
and
that's
that,
because
you
know
we
had
this
problem
sort
of
with
the
last
dashboard
too,
where
it
was
like.
Oh
yeah,
okay,
well,
you
think
you're
going
to
get
this
well.
If
we
don't,
you
know
we,
then
we
had
like
the
solution,
was
scale
impact
hours
and
give
everyone
a
little
less
impact
hours
to
make
everything
work
to
match,
and
so
I
imagine
that
we
will
need
to
do
something
slightly
similar.
E
G
E
Well,
in,
in
this
case,
we
put
in
a
six
percent
minimum
conviction:
no
six
percent
yeah
minimum
conviction,
and
you
you
think
this
is
just
a
ui
bug
that
it's
saying
that,
because
I
oh
okay,
yeah
yeah,
I.
G
G
The
there
is
a
bigger
problem,
which
is
the
this
other
the
slide
this
this
line
is,
I
think,
in
the
in
the
correct
place,
but
the
amount
that
you
are
having
is
more
than
the
one
that
that
you
needed.
E
G
Yeah
yeah,
you
are
right
now
adding
more
token
than
the
required
ones.
G
G
E
Yeah
I'll
try
it
because
we
can,
we
can
get
pretty
close
and
I'll
test
it,
and-
and
you
also
can.
G
Calculate
what
is
six
percent
of
the
tokens
and.
E
G
And
it
will
give
you
six
percent,
which
is
going
to
be
a
little
bit
less
because
of
this
precision
that
is
lost,
and
this
is
something
that
it's
it's,
how
it
is,
but
the
other
one
it's
it's
clearly
something
that
is
not
calculated
properly.
G
E
G
E
G
C
G
E
E
So
if
I
this
says,
I
need
to
add
900,
but
then
I'll
probably
even
need
to
add
a
little
bit
more
see
what
happens.
But
the
thing
is,
I
shouldn't
be
adding
new,
it's
weird
that
I'm
adding
new
tokens,
because
I
do
have
tokens
staked
on
another
proposal.
That's
just
out
of.
Like
that's
that's
past.
It's
private.
G
E
G
E
H
G
E
Oh
interesting
and
also
when
you
know
that,
and
also
when
so
I
just
went
to
change,
support
and
then
it
like
and
I
wanted
to
add
900,
but
instead
it
just
changed
my
support
to
that's
my
bad
interesting
user
experience
for
sure
I
yeah
I.
G
Makes
the
conviction
of
every
every
proposal,
including
yours,
more
difficult
to
get
conviction?
It's
a
bad
way
to
the
calculations.
E
G
G
E
G
There
is
two
maximums
one
is
the
symptot
that
you
are
selecting
and
the
other
is
the
real
maximum
that
you
can
request,
which
is
never
going
to
be
the
asymptote,
because
it
will
ask
for
infinite,
but
you
can
only
ask
for
100,
so
there
is
another
maximum
way.
Yeah.
You
are
saying:
okay,
okay,
I
I
will
get
20,
but
it's
not
20,
it's
maybe
14
or
15
percent.
G
G
E
Yeah,
so
are
there
any
action
steps
on
this
stuff
like?
Is
there
something
that
we
need
to
check,
or
I
mean
it
actually
looks?
Okay
to
me
now.
E
E
Is
calculated
so
so
that
would
be
really
interesting
if
we
could
figure
that
out
if
we
could
get
like
what
we
should
default,
because
I
guess
we
need
minimum
conviction
to
some,
we
don't
really
need
it
right
like
we
can
live
without
it.
E
G
You
don't
want
me
if
you
are
going
to
select
a
minimum
amount
of
near
six
percent,
then
the
minimum
competition,
the
minimum
effective
supply
should
not
be
five
percent
because
it's
going
to
affect
in
one
way
or
another.
E
Yeah
see
I
added
that,
and
now
it
won't
pass,
that's
great
okay.
So
but
there's
there's
no
action
steps
on
this.
Maybe
we
figure
out
a
new
default
for
minimum
effective
supply.
G
Is
the
most
complete
demonstration
of
how
everything
works
in
the
most
technical
way
is?
The
is
the
simulation?
Is
the
collapse.
G
G
Okay,
cool;
no,
not
this
one,
the
collab!
I
I
sent
to
the
group
the
one
that
was
used
later
for
doing
the
config
dashboard.