►
From YouTube: W36 Commons Swarm WG: 75% Governance giveback, issues to improve future hatch and more!
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Have you ever broke a bone?
08:58 - Issues in the Hatch that need to be fixed
17:37 - 75% Governance Giveback
41:21 - Gardens
49:52 - Dashboard is up!
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
Hey
thanks
bradley.
I
have
broken
bones
in
the
past,
but
actually
like
yesterday,
I
was
pretty
damn
close
to
getting
another
one
added
to
the
collection,
but
I
just
got
this
and
yeah.
Well,
the
rest
of
my
arm
is
really
nasty.
I
wouldn't
like
to
show
you,
but,
but
it
was
all
scratches.
Luckily,
it
was
like
a
small
motorcycle
accident,
I'm
happy
to
say
not
lately,
I'm
very
happy
to
say
that
today
and
about
agenda
topics.
B
I
would
really
like
to
suggest
the
conversation
that
happened
today
on
arbitrary
migration,
there's
just
like
a
lot
going
on
and-
and
I
feel
that
we
could
probably
talk
about
how
it's
gonna
affect
the
common
storm
and
and
all
of
the
work
that
has
been
going
on
lately,
especially
after
the
comments
upgrade.
So
I
would
like
to
suggest
this
agenda
topic
and
other
than
that
intentions.
C
D
D
And
I
will
show
you
in
the
meantime.
Well,
it's
like
it
looks
like
it's
not
loading.
Can
you
guys
see
my
video,
yet
it's
showing
us
loading.
At
my
end,
I
have
a
broken
finger
that
I'm
trying
to
hold
up
and
my
intention
is
just
to
catch
up
but
like
it's
healed
now,
but
I
jammed
a
finger
in
jiu
jitsu
and
it's
in
a
perma
curve.
Now
so
yeah
broken
bones
are
a
thing
with
me
and
al
pass
to.
I
hope.
I'm
saying
this
right.
D
E
D
E
E
F
F
No,
it's
okay!
It's
okay!
This
is,
I
mean
this
is
the
common
swarm
culture.
I
don't
even
know
if
this
is
a
common
culture
in
one
hive
or
not,
but
it
comes
from
like
giveth
and
common
stack
culture
either
way
the
my
my
I
have
broken
a
few
bones.
I
have
a
really
high
pain
tolerance.
So
when
I
break
a
bone,
I
just
don't
believe
it.
F
F
Where
I
have
this,
I'm
actually
on
a
scooter
with
a
unicorn,
and
that
was
this
is
like
off
of
a
real
picture
that
was
drawn
because
I
at
burning
man,
I
had
a
handicap
pass,
so
I
could
use
this
scooter
to
drive
around,
even
though
you're
not
usually
supposed
to
be
able
to
do
that.
So
that's
cool.
So
I
have
a
broken
leg
in
my
profile
picture,
but
yeah
intentions.
For
this
call,
I
am
happy
to
share
the
review.
F
The
the
outputs
of
the
other
call
that
we
had
about
the
improvements
for
the
hatch
and
yeah.
I
just
want
to
hear
definitely
hear
any
updates
from
sam
on
evm
crispr
and
figure
out
what
the
blockers
are
to
launching
something
so
that
demoing,
the
full
product
is,
is
always
my
dream
so
I'll.
Ask
that
every
time
and
I'll
pass
it
to
vitor.
G
Hey
guys,
yeah,
I
broke
my
bone
of
my
knee
once
and
it's
pretty
bad,
because
I
I
kind
of
run
seriously-
and
sometimes
I
just
like-
cannot
run
more
than
some
length
because
of
my
knee
to
seal
like
pants
and
yeah,
and
I
broke
my
little
finger
as
well
and
intentions
for
the
call
sync
up
see
how
how's
the
comments
upgrade
going
and
I'm
doing
giving
some
updates
in
the
comments
upgrade
dashboard
as
well,
because
graphic
dashboard,
yeah
and
that's
it
I'll
pass
to
septimus.
Did
your
oracle
or
you
know
what
else.
H
Not
really
good.
Thank
you.
Victor
yeah,
I
didn't
go
yeah.
My
intention
for
the
call
is
just
to
sing
up
agenda
topic.
I
think
it
would
be
worse
to
talk
about
the
the
state
of
the
common
swarm
regarding
the
75
percent
of
the
token
governance.
After,
like
the
firm
discussion
like
just
to
make
some
clarity
on
the
community
and
regarding
the
bonds
I
never
broke
one.
I
was
very
good
kid
all
day
playing
video
games
so
no
chance
to
get
anybody
broken
yeah,
I'll,
pass
it
to
bradley.
A
Let's
see!
Last
week
we
had
a
review
of
the
my
mouse
is
shaking.
I
must
have
a
virus,
that's
not
good!
All
right,
so
griff
forwarded
on
the
the
issues
that
need
to
be
fixed.
I
think
this
will
be
a
great
place
to
start
before
we
get
into
updates
on
the
work.
So,
let's
see
I'll
just
read
through
the
read
through
some
highlights
real
quick
here
remove
the
vesting
completely
because
it
was
left
in
the
pre-sale.
F
Let's
see,
that's
exactly
it,
there's
only
invest.
The
vesting
is
not
even
used,
there's
no
vest.
The
detached
token
is
non-transferable
so
like.
Why
is
there
vesting
on
a
non-transferable
token
anyway?
We
just
left
it
there
because
the
pre-sale
was
audited,
but
but
then
it
actually
caused
problems.
So
it
was
a
mistake
to
leave
it
in.
We
thought
it
was
the
right
solution,
but
it
wasn't
okay,
but
also
time
and
stuff.
F
It
was
the
right
solution,
given
everything,
but
if
we
redid
it,
we
should
everything
was
the
right
thing
because
we
launched
right
so
like
we
did
everything
right,
but
we
could
have
done
it
better
here.
Maybe
I'll
go
through
these,
because
I
wrote
this
and
I
can
give
the
context
I'm
just
reading
now
is.
It
looks
like
it
has
no
context.
The
refund
script
is
a
bit
centralized
and
it's
probably,
but
that
issue
will
be
fixed
if
we
remove
vesting.
F
If
we
don't
remove
the
vesting,
then
maybe
we
can
figure
out
a
better
solution
there.
The
hatch
connector
is
not
needed,
so
the
hatch
connector
is
like
what
makes
the
website
is
the
graph,
the
sub
graph
and
the
sub
graph
tracks
transactions,
but
we
don't
need
to
track
transactions
really.
So
we
could
remove
that
complication
from
the
hatch
completely
and
and
really
yeah.
F
It's
just
more
work
than
it's
needed
and
we
can
just
go
directly
from
the
contracts
and
events
yeah.
We
we
can
add
a
multi-step
panel.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
ever
used
celeste,
but
it
has
this
really
nice,
like
approved,
like
three-step
like
pop-up.
That
shows
you
your
progress
as
you're
making
the
transaction.
F
So
it
would
be
nice
to
have
that
kind
of
ux
experience
for
people
who
are
making
transactions
because
they
have
to
first
they
have
to
do
you,
know
approve,
and
then
they
have
to
send
the
transaction
and
then
oh,
you
know
so
a
similar
walkthrough
would
be
good.
We
had
a
white
page
error
where
the
hatch
went
down
and
there
was
just
a
white
page
and
unhandled
error
and
so
hope
that
was
because
the
graph
went
down
so
again.
F
If
we
remove
the
connector,
then
we
won't
have
this
white
page
error
to
worry
about,
but
we
should
probably
still
make
sure
to
handle
errors
a
little
bit
better
and
make
sure
it
goes
to
the
error
page
and
not
just
like
a
blank
screen,
because
that's
not
good
and
then
we
also
need
to
apollo
and
follow
and
sen
analyzed
a
bug.
Paula
found
the
bug
and
some
some
went
deep
into
it
to
see
like
if
there
were
any
situations
where
someone
could
actually
make
money
by
sending
money
to
the
hatch
and
then
rage
quit.
F
It
was
like
because
he
had
so
many
more
impact
hours.
His
impact,
our
rate,
went
up
more
than
the
cost
of
putting
money
in
and
so
avoiding
that,
avoiding
that
you
know.
Luckily
we
avoided
it.
It
really
wasn't
there.
There
was
just
maybe
just
a
little
bit
possibility,
but
just
being
aware
of
that
vulnerability
of
a
misaligned
incentive,
and
then
there
were
some
other
other
topics
that
were
probably
too
big
to
include.
F
But
there
were
kind
of
ideas,
but
that
it
it
felt
like
to
me
when
I
was
in
the
call
that
these
ideas
were
like
more
work
than
than
their
than
the
impact.
But
it
would
be
interesting
to
include
celeste
into
dandelion
dao
and
the
migration
tools
themselves
could
be
a
really
good
product.
As
like
a
dow
to
down
negotiation
tool
where
you
both
download
this
app
and
then
the
dows
can
actually
exchange
tokens
and
exchange
things
with
them.
F
Each
other
within
one
transaction,
and
so
migration,
tooling,
is
really
interesting
as
a
product
and
then
also
we
could.
Instead
of
starting
out
with
a
hatch
and
a
dandelion
dowel,
we
could
technically
add
the
some
of
the
features
of
dandelion
dow
to
gardens
and
actually
start
with
the
gardens
and
not
need
the
migration
tools
and
just
migrate
from
like
basically
start
with
a
garden.
F
F
Yeah,
I'm
in
vienna,
outside
of
a
conference
where
the
the
internet
sucks
it's
like
the
ccg
and
like
zargham's
here,
jeff
and
dan
and
jess
and
and
arthur
brock
just
gave
a
talk
but
online
he
was
supposed
to
come.
He
didn't,
but
it's
like
a
bunch
of
blockchain
for
good
people,
but
the
the
walls
and
the
internet
sucks
and
the
walls
are
full
of
lead.
So
I
have
to
go
outside
to
get
good
enough
wi-fi
to
do
a
video
call.
H
A
B
F
Before
we
like
realize,
and
then
when
we
do,
the
upgrade
we'll
probably
have
to
have
another
one
of
these
retrospectives
so
that
we
can
make
sure
to
capture
overarching
things
to
improve
this.
Hopefully
one
day
the
hatch
could
be
its
own
product.
You
know
I
don't.
I
don't
know
if
that
will
happen,
but
it
it
wouldn't
happen
very
well
without
this.
So.
A
C
F
F
So
the
the
I
hadn't
read
your
reply.
So
the
the
topic
is,
we
want
to
separate
governance
from
the
from
okay
background.
There
are
praise
debates
right
and
one
of
the
the
winning
the
winning
proposal
that
ended
up
being
compromised
with
was
called
no
abnormal
intervention,
and
one
of
the
suggestions
in
that
in
that
post
was
that
we
try
to
reward
people
who
deducted
impact
hours
with
because
they
were
deducted
because
they
were
paid,
but
that
deduction
doesn't
that
their
payment
was
just
die,
and
so
they
were
deducted.
F
But
what
they
reducted
deducted
was
money
and
governance
rights,
and
that's
not
really
fair.
There
did
they
shouldn't
be
deducted
governance
rights
for
being
paid.
They
should
just
be
deducted
money,
and
so
the
idea
was
well.
We
can
tease
them
apart.
We
can
still
reward
the
people
who
were
deducted
with
governance
rights
and
that
would
be
up
to
70.
F
That
would
be
about
75
percent
of
the
governance
rights
that
they
would
have
received
had
they
not
received
it
to
any
deductions,
and
so
that
that
and
the
75
percent
idea
was
because,
while
they
did
agree
to
by
taking
payment,
they
agreed
to
receive
a
governance
deduction.
But
it's
probably
in
the
dow's
best
interest
to
actually
have
governance
in
the
hands
of
the
people
who
are
being
paid
to
do
this
work
full-time
because
their
heads
are
in
it
and
they
have.
They
have
good
perspective,
so
governance
rights
by
not
giving
them
governance
rights.
F
F
There
is
a
quick
and
dirty
solution
that
sem
and
I
have
a
conflict
around
a
like
a
disagreement
around
whether
or
not
it's
harmful
or
not.
To
take
that
to
take
that
quick
and
dirty
solution,
and
that
would
be
to
make
a
one
character
change
in.
I
guess
yeah
one
character
change
in
the
bonding
curve
contract
and
I,
if
we
make
it
it'd,
probably
be
a
two
character
change,
but
basically
there's
the
virtual
supply.
F
Parameter
and
right
now
that
virtual
supply
parameter
is
in
is
an
unsigned
integer,
so
it
can
only
be
a
positive
number,
but
if
we
turn
that
into
a
negative
integer,
then
if
we
make
it
just
an
int,
we
remove
the.
U
then
it
could
be
a
negative
number
and
effectively
the
dow
could
mint
tec
tokens
and,
at
the
same
time
make
the
virtual
supply
negative.
So
the
bonding
curve
would
basically
ignore
the
minting
of
the
tokens
so
for
the
bonding
curve
price
it
wouldn't
be
affected.
F
The
bonding
curve,
like
everything
would
it
would
be
balanced
out,
because
the
dow
could
actually
negates
the
minting,
so
it
can.
But
then,
when
it
mints
those
tokens,
it
puts
those
tokens
into
an
infinite.
Vesting
contract
infinite
a
long
time
we'll
all
die
before
it's
unvested
right,
so
that
those
tokens
could
never
be
sold
into
the
bonding
curve
or
anything
they
would
only
be
available
for
governance.
F
So
that's
the
quick
and
dirty
solution.
It
would
it's
great
because
it
has
a
one
character:
change,
it's
horrible
because
it
has
not
been
tested.
It
has
not
really
been
thoroughly
reviewed
on
whether
or
not
it
is
safe,
and
it
also
creates
some
weird
side
effects
on
like
eat
on
like
block
scout.
It
will
look
like
people
have
more
money
in
their
wallet
than
they
actually
do,
and
these
sorts
of
things
right
and
some
can
probably
go
more
into
the
other
negatives
around
around
it.
F
The
other
solution
is
drawn
up
on
this
forum
post,
where
that
sum
has
that
would
be
basically
making
it
so
that
you
can
have
two
tokens
work
in
conviction,
voting
long
story
short.
So
then
we
would
mint
a
non-transferable
token.
That's
different
than
the
tec
token.
We
won't
have
to
mess
with
bonding
curve,
math
or
anything,
and
we
could
just
have
multiple
tokens
aggregate
into
voting
on
conviction
voting.
F
That
would
be
the
ideal
solution.
However,
it
will
take
a
lot
of
development
and
would
not
be
ready
at
launch.
Nor
will
it
guarantee
to
ever
be
ready.
So
it's
like
it
would
be
like
a
hope,
and
probably
it
would
take
so
long.
It
would
also
take
another
vote,
so
we
would
never
really
do
it
anyway.
You
know
it
take
another
vote,
the
tc
to
even
upgrade
and
do
all
these
things.
F
So
it's
it's
kind
of
not
really.
If,
if
if
that
was
the
only
solution
going,
then
this
vote
would
be
kind
of
irrelevant,
but
but
it
would
if
the
vote
passes,
then
we
and
we
can't
and
we're
fat,
and
we
find
that
the
the
unsigned
making
the
integer
making
it
an
integer
may
take
making
the
one
character
change
would
have
dramatic
effects
or
risks
that
are
unacceptable.
F
J
C
C
This
dirty
and
quick
solution
will
be
time,
but
at
the
same
time
it
is
not
good
practice
at
all,
and
this
is
why
I
will
discard
it.
I
don't
think
that
this
is.
This
should
be
the
the
way
to
go
specifically
because
because
this,
because
we
can't
say
that
the
dao
can
annulate
the
bad
effect
of
this,
there
are
cases
in
which
the
dao
could
not
emulate
it.
C
C
C
This
is
the
only
thing
that
is
available
right
now,
using
the
guardian's
template
in
the
future.
There
will
be
other
possibilities
for
having
a
multi
multi-token
garden,
or
this
kind
of
things
it's
an
interesting
thing
to
have
so
probably
in
half
a
year.
I
don't
know
it's
something
that
will
be
available
so
having
this
new
governance
tokens
already
in
the
dao.
C
C
Go
but
also
conviction
voting,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
for,
and
that
is
interesting,
I
don't
know
if
the
proposal
is
going
to
pass.
Actually
maybe
it's
something
that
we
can
discuss
after
the
proposal
passes,
but
I
will
not
go.
I
I
am
not
going
to
put
some
something
that
is
potentially
potentially
threat
harmful
in
in
the
code.
F
Excuse
me
like
what
would
what
would
be
an
example
of
that
risk
occurring?
Like
you
know,
I
mean
if
I
mean,
because
that
risk
is
still
the
case
with
virtual
supply,
if
it
was
a
positive
number
right,
like
there's
a
misconfiguration
risk
of
that
positive
number,
being
2
being
higher
being
not
what
it
should
be
as
well
right.
F
C
C
F
The
thing
is
for
this
to
be
messed
up
right:
it
takes
a
dow
vote
to
change
it
to
change
the
virtual
supply
and
the
dao
could
vote
to
just
take
all
the
money
and
burn
it
like.
The
dow
votes
are
inherently
risky
in
this
circumstance
you
know
so,
like
I
don't
feel
like
giving.
The
functionality
actually
adds
any
extra
risk.
That's
not
already
there.
C
Yeah
and
we
it
and
when
it
moves
money
out
of
the
bonding
curve
or
whatever
it,
it
says
clearly
in
the
in
the
message
that
you
are
moving
money
out
of
somewhere
and
people
vote
based
on
on
that.
But
it's
not
it's!
It
doesn't
look
like
something
that
you
are
going
to
be
doing
within
a
boat.
It's
it's
more
like
it's
a
a
kind
of
a
hidden
effect,
and
it's
it's.
What
I
said
in
the
post
is
it's
faulty
by
the
design.
C
It's
not
the
way
that
you
should
be
building
a
a
bonding
curve,
and
even
if
it
could
be
something
that
we
do
specifically
for
dc,
I
would
not
have
this
for
the
general
bonding
curve
out
there,
and
still
I
don't
want
to
do
this
in
for
for
pc,
because
it
is
directly
it's
flawed
by
design
you.
You
have
to
always
remember
that
you
have
this
weird
thing
with
the
one
thing
and.
D
What
what
are
the
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt?
What
are
the?
What
are
the
I
mean,
because
I
think
I
think
we
understand
this
argument
here.
I'm
pretty
sure
what
are
the
issues
with
with
deploying
a
second
governance
only
token,
what
are
the
issues
with
that
can?
Why
is
there
a
problem
with
allowing
conviction
voting
with
with
deploying
conviction,
voting
with
two
governance,
tokens
with
two
separate
tokens
that
counts.
F
D
B
D
F
D
F
So
the
the
biggest
problem
there,
what
could
be
done
is
base
but
would
be
kind
of
bad
ux
would
be
basically
using
a
new
governance
token.
That,
then,
would
could
would
effectively
be
a
maybe
a
broken
wrapped
token.
You
know
so.
People
could
deposit
tec
and
then
be
able
to
vote
in
conviction,
voting
that
that
could
work
and
then
we'd
like
by
default
issue,
these
wrapped
tokens
in
advance.
I
think
this
is
kind
of
how
the
byot
conviction
voting
works
in
gardens.
D
F
If
he
does
review
it,
and
he
believes
that
it's
safe
from
what
I
can
see
in
my
very
mild
un,
uneducated
review,
it
seems
very
safe
or
it
doesn't
add
any
extra
risk.
I
agree
that
it
makes
the
bonding
curve
less
elegant,
but
I
don't
for,
in
my
opinion
I
don't
care
if
the
bonding
curve
is
less
elegant.
I
actually
just
want
functionality
for
my
for
my
community.
You
know-
and
there
are
other
functionalities
that
this
that
could
this
could
enable
that.
I
really
desire
well.
D
C
F
Yeah
and
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
ifs
right
for
does
the
governance.
Does
the
community
agree
that
it's
even
worth
doing
right
like
if
that
is
voted?
No,
then
the
community
doesn't
need
it
anyway
and
then
also
if
brett
says
it's
unsafe,
then
in
this
case
and
also
maybe
potentially
some
you
might
come,
you
might
change
your
opinion
as
well.
Right
I
mean
that's
also
a
possibility.
F
C
C
C
A
F
G
F
F
F
A
C
C
C
C
It
only
took
to
write
a
ibm
crisper
script
in
order
to
have
two
two
agents,
one
million
tools
and
ethereum
within
it,
and
the
thing
that
we
are
right
now
is:
we
are
going
to
migrate
it
I
just
have
to
coordinate
with
paolo
in
order
to
see
if
he's
ready
and
and
check
it
out
the
own
cities
on
city's
dawn.
The
next
step
will
be
to
do
this
test
with
all
the
community
if
we
want,
because
we
we
also
it.
C
C
C
C
C
Okay,
so
did
you
see
my
screen?
Yes,
okay,
so
it
is
going
to
be
the
we
have
a
different
way
to
when,
when
you
are,
the
ibm.
Crisper
is
a
javascript
library,
so
it
has
it
its
own
javascript
functions,
but
we
also
think
that
command
line
language
like
this
one
would
be
interesting
for
this,
so
it
would
be
as
easy
as
using
these
five
commands
in
order
to
put
one
after
the
other
to
configure
the
the
boat.
So,
for
example,
we
could
have
a
install
new
voting.
C
H
C
So
token
manager
is
the
reference
to
the
to
the
token
manager,
in
that
case,
the
first
program
manager
that
is
installed,
and
you
can
also
give
the
fifty
percent
support
and
one
and
ten
percent
quorum
using
this
indicator
that
give
it
the
it
multiplies
it
by
10
to
the
18.,
and
you
can
also
execute
a
mint
over
the
token
manager,
token
manager
and
token
manager.
0
is
the
same.
C
You
can
also
mint
some
100
tokens
and
then
you
can
also
use
the
agent
in
order
to
swap
or
revoke
permissions.
So
this
will
look
is
it.
This
looks
like
how
it
should
be
the
this.
The
script,
let's
say
the
script,
language
for
the
evm
crisper
and
you
just
write
it,
and
this
is
what
it
goes
directly
to
the
to
the
down
in
order
to
have
a
boat.
C
I
C
E
C
C
J
C
A
F
G
Now
yeah,
like
the
initial
part,
like
of
the
introduction
of
the
dashboard,
so
you
can
understand
better
like
each
section.
Is
there
the
learning
section
as
well?
So
you
can
like,
as
I
like,
understand,
a
little
bit
by
parameters
and
then
the
first
section.
There
is
a
token
lockup,
it's
good
to
play
with
and
also
the
top
loading.
So
you
can
go
there
and
play
with.
G
There
are
a
few
little
things
that
you
need
to
fix
yet,
but,
like
the
the
general
goal,
integration
of
the
back
end
is
there
and
there
are
like
two
other
parts
to
launch.
So
probably
the
next
one
would
be
the
conviction,
volume
which
would
be
very
nice
and
then
then,
after
the
abc
and
finally,
we
will
have
the
stats
page.