►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Agenda
01:00 - Github
17:40 - Forum organization
30:10 - Voting communications
31:52 - When to launch the new discord?
45:38 - Macro/micro sense making
50:51 - Closing
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
So
is,
let's
see
dan
dan
did
not
end
up
joining
okay,
because
dan
had
some
questions
that
he
wanted
to
ask,
but
that's
okay,
so
the
agenda,
I
was
gonna
start
by
looking
over
the
github
and
I
organized
all
the
issues
with
tamara
last
week.
Thank
you
tamara
for
helping
me.
There
was
a
lot
to
kind
of
get
through
and
getting
more
breaking
down
some
of
these
huge
epics
into
issues.
A
Yeah,
that's
fine!
I
I
was
planning
to
go
through
the
in
progress,
but
I'm
just
going
over
if
no
one
has
ever
looked
at
the
comms
issues
before
epics,
I'm
just
briefly
naming
what
is
the
main
work
going
on
right
now
and
then
what
is
the
work
going
on
in
this
sprint?
And
then
what
are
some
of
the
things
that,
if
anybody's
looking
to
work
on
some
issues,
what
is
open
to
kind
of
take
on
so
yeah?
The
narrative
work,
the
onboarding
video.
A
Hatch
comes
so
any
kind
of
email
campaigns
that
would
be
going
on
to
communicate
with
everyone,
or
maybe
some
of
the
like
how
to's
that
we'll
be
doing
once
the
app
is
ready
and
then
yeah
like
our
regular
content,
production
and
distribution
like
promotions
for
different
things
which
I've
asked
for
help
on
that,
and
then
we
are
getting
closer
to
finishing
the
website.
So
and
again,
I'm
trying
to
keep
this
brief.
Just
for
like
five
minutes
right
now,
dan
and
craig
are
working
on
organizing
our
crm.
A
So
he
has
asked
me-
and
maybe
I
could
also
see
who
could
be
interested
to
work
on
this
together
to
refine
the
tec
website,
content
for
the
final
like
home
page
and
then
there's
a
few
pieces
in
the
works
on
why
the
tec
and
then
working
on
the
onboarding
video
concept
and
then
one
other
piece.
That's
in
the
works
on
governance.
C
A
Okay,
that's
great
zapie
and
you
said
you're
interested
in
the
editing
part.
So
for
right
now
we
kind
of
had
the
onboarding
broken
down
into
a
couple
of
steps.
We
have
the
concept
refinement,
so
I
am
taking
some
of
the
brainstorming
that
we've
done
and
putting
in
a
document,
and
I
can
pass
it
around,
but
tamara
suggested.
C
A
That
is
more
of
like
yeah.
Obviously
it's
hard
to
do
things
by
committees,
but
I
definitely
want
to
get
feedback.
I
feel
like
we
already
did
that
in
a
meeting.
So
now
I'm
trying
to
like
distill
that
and
chat
about
it
with
sam,
because
he
had
some
particularly
strong
feelings
about
it
and
made
a
forum
post.
But
if
anybody
else
wants
to
work
on
the
concept
feel
free
to
speak
or
message
me.
B
A
No,
I
mean
we
had
discussed
a
few
different
things
and
yes,
we
basically
said
in
the
last
meeting
sam
presented
his
forum
post,
which
was
either
doing
a
concept,
video,
which
is
something
similar
to
what
aragon
did,
which
is
really
cool.
But
that
takes
a
lot
more
resources
and
I
think,
with
the
time
that
we
have,
we
decided
we'd
rather
do
something
that's
kind
of
like
decentralized
and
that
everybody
or
different
people
in
the
community
can
kind
of
speak.
A
So
it
would
be
something
about
about
the
tec
and
why
we're
here
where
our
mission
is
and
why
people
should
participate,
but
in
in
different
voices
so
either
we
would
have
a
script
and,
everybody
would
say
say
like
a
different
part
of
the
script
or
we
would.
I
thought
we
could
try
kind
of
both
at
the
same
time
and
ask
people
to
like
record
themselves.
A
A
No
not
yet
that's
what
I'm
working
on
this
week.
Well,
we
had
just
basically
I
talked
to
some
at
the
end
of
last
week
and
we
were
just
discussing
like
script
versus
free
flow,
and
then
I
thought
well.
We
can
do
both
and
see
kind
of
what's
better
because
maybe
we'll
have
like
a
script
and
then,
but
sometimes
when
you
leave
it
open-ended,
people
will
say
like.
D
D
Yeah
I
mean,
obviously
I
won't
be
able
to
do
that
alone.
I
guess
like
we
need
some
sort
of
like
outline
for
what
are
we
going
to
be
communicating
in
the
video
so
sort
of
some
sort
of
a
script
that
we
can
then
divide
into
some
frames,
or
something
like
that
and
then
into
each
frame,
we're
going
to
tell
this
or
that
or
whatever
we're
gonna
insert
a
interview
from
different
people
whatever,
but
just
like
a
skeleton
of
the
whole
video
of
those
two
minutes.
What
will
be
there?
D
D
A
A
D
E
A
A
Yeah,
I
also
wanted
to
ask
you
about
your
editing
experience,
but
I'll
I'll.
Ask
you
like
just
to
message
me
later:
okay,
so
yes,
that
is
something
I
wanted
to
do
like
a
mini
work
session
on
this
week,
or
at
least
like
start
the
document
and
then
pass
it
around
for
feedback
async.
If
that
works
better,
because
I
feel
like
people
are
pretty
booked
this
week,
but
at
least
we
can
just
gather
some
bullet
points
and
start
to
sketch
that
out.
A
Okay,
so
and
nate
you
had
said,
you
were
interested
to
start
to
take
issues
or
to
help
on
some
pieces.
Are
you
more
interested
in
writing,
or
you
also
said
you
were
thinking
about
putting
together
some
notes
for
some
ideas
on
what
kind
of
pieces
being
that
you
have
this
like
fresh
perspective,
some
some
notes
on
some
pieces
that
you
think
are
missing
or
things
that
need
to
be
communicated.
F
Yeah
yeah
I'm
very
interested
in
writing
some
pieces.
I
think
a
big
thing
is
trying
to
delineate
between
the
tec
and
the
common
stack
mission
and
really
putting
I
guess
whatever
the
priority
is.
I
guess
the
tec
out
there
at
first
and
say
you
know
this
is
what
we're
about.
This
is
what
we're
trying
to
solve,
with
the
tec
in
particular,
but
I'm
not
sure
yeah,
but
I'm
down
to
down
to
right
as
many
pieces
as
necessary
to
try
and
construct
that
message
in
any
way
we
can
so.
A
Okay
and
I'm
not
sure
if
you're
free
this
afternoon,
if
griff
likes
this
idea,
but
there's
actually
a
cs
comms
meeting,
which
is
kind
of
dual
function
right
now,
and
we
started
this
process
of
like
distilling
the
two
narratives
and
started
looking
at
these
roadmaps,
and
we
need
some
more
discussions
on
like
specific
pieces.
We
kind
of
sketched
out
pieces
that
would
come
from.
You
know
one
side
and
the
other,
and
there
are
some
interdependencies,
but
still
I'm
finding.
A
It
is
a
challenge
and
for
me
I
would
love
your
help
on
getting
into
some
specific
pieces
like
even
right.
Now,
I'm
working
on
one
and
there's
like
a
lot
of
different.
You
know
kind
of
feedback
about
what
information
is
coming
from
who
so
I
think
it
would
help.
Since
you
have
looked
at
the
two
projects
and
you're
coming
in
with
fresh
eyes
to
like
we
kind
of
have,
I
everybody
has
some
kind
of
different
ideas,
but
getting
those
into
like
very
specific
scaffolding
would
be
really
helpful.
F
A
The
main
I
guess
central
place
for
communications
is
the
manifesto
which
also
needs
updating.
So
maybe
maybe
we
could
work
together
on
a
few
things
or
yeah.
We
need
to
spend
some
time
to
update
the
communications
manifesto,
so
if
you're
willing
to
take
that
on
and
like
lead
that
and
then
ask
me
if
you
have
questions
or
would
you.
F
G
F
A
Yeah
there
are
some
things
missing
like
specifically
like
this
mirror
links.
I
need
to
add
in
the
manifesto
so
thanks
for
bringing
that
up,
because
I
actually
kind
of
forgot
about
that,
because
I
just
know
where
everything
is,
but
that's
a
good
reminder.
So
let
me
just
are
you
on
github
nate
or
do
we
need
to
invite
you?
I.
B
Nate,
if
you
just
shoot
your
your
github
username
to
me
on
telegram
I'll
I'll,
add
you
while
we're
doing
this
call
hey.
I
have
an
idea
jess.
What
do
you
think
of
nate
writing
an
article
from
the
perspective
of
somebody
who's
new
to
the
tec
and
what
excites
him
about
the
tec
because
it
seems
like
that
would
be.
You
know,
authentic,
an
authentic
view
from
somebody
who's
coming
into
the
tec
for
the
first
time
with
fresh
eyes
and
what
excites
him?
A
A
F
A
A
A
G
H
It's
a
goddamn
mess
and
it's
my
fault.
I
told
everybody
to
go
to
the
forum,
go
to
the
tec,
make
post
and
now
the
whole
thing's.
Just
this
octopus
of
mess
anyways
it's
it's
just
gonna,
be
monotonous,
mundane
work,
it
sucks,
because
you
need
to
have
it
done
right,
the
first
time,
because
the
way
discourse
is
so
I'm
gonna
have
to
go
in
there.
We
either
have
all
parent
categories.
H
We
can't
have
subcategories,
so
we
have
to
either
be
very
organized
on
what,
where
everything
should
go
and
redo
it,
which
means
what
we'll
have
to
save
all
these
posts
too,
because
someone
and
then
you
got
to
save
the
comments,
because
you
can't
delete
anything
it'll
delete
it
from
the
whole
thing,
so
it
needs
a
whole
whole
work
over
when
we
what
we
really
need
to
do,
because
it's
just
it's
easy,
monotonous
work.
So
it's
just!
H
H
G
G
H
G
H
A
So
yeah,
I
totally
agree
with
you.
You
know
when
I
did
this
three
months
ago.
We
didn't
have
any
information
there.
So
of
course,
now
we're
actually
seeing
how
people
are
using
this
platform
and
yeah.
I
agree
with
you.
I
think
it's
super
messy.
I
also
was
feeling
like
olivia.
I
know
we
discussed
is
the
way
we
wanted
to
do
proposals,
but
I
actually
kind
of
was
feeling
like
funding.
Proposals
is
one
section
and
I
think
parent
categories
for
like
community
polling
and
dandelion
voting
would
be
much
cleaner
but
yeah.
A
I
think
this
needs
kind
of
a
dedicated
session
and
some
ongoing
work
on
the
back
end
and
categorizing
these
things
and,
for
example,
even
ecosystem
like
I
had
invented
that
that
would
be
something
for
like
one
hive
or
I
don't
know,
other
people
to
use,
but
no
one's
actually
posted
anything
in
it.
So
maybe
we
delete
that
and
then
that
gives
us
space
for
another
category.
A
So
I
guess
my
proposal
will
be
to
break
out
the
main,
the
dandelion
voting,
the
conviction,
funding
and
the
community
polling
into
three
separate
parent
categories,
because
I
think
that's
the
main
place.
We
have
the
mass
and
then
yeah,
I
do
think,
having
maybe
some
subcategories
for
community,
though
right
now,
it's
not
so
many
posts.
I
think
even
like
this.
Could
you
know
ostrom's
framework
in
daos
or
commons
could
be
a
parent
category.
You
know,
or
you
could
put
that
as
a
subcategory
on
your
community.
A
So
what
would
you
guys
like
to
do
for
an
action
item?
I
think
maybe
having
a
breakout
session
to
discuss
it
can
even
be
30
minutes
and
somebody
championing
it
jake
sounds
like
you're
willing
to
do
that
and
contacting
like
a
person
who
has
familiarity
with
this
course,
because
for
me
I,
like
I,
never
used
it
when
I
set
it
up,
so
maybe
jake.
If
you
want
to
track
down
burrata
and
olivia
also,
I
know
you
talked
to
chris
a
lot.
What
do
you
guys
think.
H
Yeah,
I
mean
that's
fine,
I
don't
mind
bothering
someone
in
one
hive,
because
I'd
really
like
this
to
look
a
lot.
Theirs
looks
great,
like
livy
is
right,
it's
really
nice
and
it's
easy
to
get
through
it's
easy
to
work
through
so
yeah.
That's,
that's
cool!
Anything!
That's
going
to
save
me
more
time
than
my
eye
does
I
don't
really
want
to
do
that
at
all.
A
C
A
A
A
A
B
A
But
yeah
right
now,
there's
not
even
an
issue
so
just
getting
that
on
the
board.
Yeah
there's
no
issue
at
all,
so
yeah
jake.
If
you
get
that
on
the
board
and
then
just
pull
me
or
libby
or
if
you
need
honest
contact
or
whatever
let
us
know,
is
she
okay?
That
was
the
form.
Okay.
Next
topic
was
voting
communications.
A
I
wanted
to
bring
that
up
not
to
get
in
a
discussion
too
much
about
governance,
but
more
so
like
for
me.
It
feels
like
from
a
communications
perspective
like
I
went
to
write
the
blog
last
week
and
there
were
a
few
votes
that
kind
of
like
felt
like
they
snuck
in
there,
and
I
didn't
really
understand
them
fully
and
if
I
don't
understand,
then
definitely
the
community
doesn't
understand.
A
So
I
was
thinking,
maybe,
as
we've
been
touching
a
little
bit
more
on
this
discussion
of
like
how
to
improve
the
communications
and
engage
voting
like
them,
for
example,
slid
in
that
dandelion
vote,
but
we
didn't
announce
it
in
the
thursday
meeting.
So
maybe
we
just
need
to
revisit
and
refresh
the
voting
process.
Livia
and
maybe
it's
like
people
need
to
have
their
vote
ready
to
announce
in
the
thursday
meeting
or
it
doesn't
get
voted
on
that
weekend
because
even
for
me,
I
was
looking
at
that
dandelion
vote
going.
What
is
this
about?
How?
A
What
is
the
voting
like
he
said?
The
voting
duration
is
three
days,
but
there
was
no
specific
time.
The
vote
ended
and
it
just
wasn't
that
clear
about
what
like
what
what
was
the
vote
I
know
was
to
update
us.
You
know
smart
contract
because
of
a
bug
that
they
found,
but
I
don't
think
anybody
else
really
understood.
I
don't
know
how
many
people
voted
on
it,
but
it
didn't
come
before
it
didn't
get
announced
in
the
thursday
meeting.
G
I
think
that
vote
was
held
in
the
in
the
in
the
dandelion
section
in
the
in
the
dow,
and
then
the
votes
happened
there.
So
this
proposal
in
the
dandelion
voting
section
was
just
to
point
that
there
was
a
proposal
in
the
in
the
dandelion
dao
and
then
people
could
vote
with
test
tech
tokens
right,
maybe
griff!
You
can
talk
more
about
this.
E
A
Even
I
I
had
to
ask
griff
again,
because
I
was
trying
to
dig
through
all
the
docs
to
find
that
so
maybe
like
a
shorter
version
of
what
is
the
voting
process,
how
do
people
submit
proposals
and
having
templates
for
dandelion
community
polling
and
the
funding
the
funding
ones
we
have,
but
maybe
these
other
two
and
it's
not.
You
know
right
now,
like
we're
not
going
to
have
that
many
dandelion
votes.
G
I'm
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
those
in
soft
too,
so
we
were
closing
those
those
votes
that
were
open
since
the
holidays
that
they
had
like
a
lot
of
visibility
for
people
to
vote
on
and
yeah.
I
think
I
think
things
are
are
working
there.
It's
just
like
having
like
a
little
bit
of
patience
because
it's
it's
almost
almost
there.
A
Okay
cool,
so
that's
just
like
yeah,
it's
kind
of
ongoing
and
it's
in
process
to
discover.
I
guess
for
me
just
yeah
the
forum
was
the
only
thought
that
I
had
and
so
okay,
you
have
it
just
while
we
were
discussing
with
jake
the
forum.
That
was
just
the
thought.
Okay,
so
I
won't
do
anything
further.
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
feedback,
and
sometimes
some
of
these
I'm
not
sure
because
there's
a
crossover,
it's
more,
it's
mo.
It's
like
99
softcup,
but
with
communications
and
the
forum
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
up.
A
Since
we
were
discussing
okay.
The
next
topic
I
was
hoping
for
some
feedback
on
was
when
to
launch
the
new
discord
and
how
perfect
do
we
want
it
to
be
before
we
launch
it?
So
I
think
I
just
chatted
with
chris
briefly
and
via
telegram,
and
he
was
telling
me
it's
pretty
much.
There
he's
just
doing
one
last
integration
and
then
we
could
pretty
much
launch
it
once
we
do
the
organization
of
like
the
categories
and
whatnot.
So
that's
on
the
list
here
is
to.
A
It's
on
the
list
somewhere.
It's
definitely
on
the
board
to
just
do
like
the
category
setup,
which
is
not
too
much
work.
So
the
question
is
just
around:
like
you
know,
we'll
have
chris
has
been
doing
some
of
the
kind
of
onboarding
stuff
in
discord
in
the
new
discord
so
yeah,
I
guess
what
is
gonna
be
when
do
we
launch
it?
How
how
far
ahead
of
the
hatch
and
santi
is
here
also,
I
know
you
guys,
we
don't
like.
A
E
A
A
Yeah,
so
the
plan
was
that,
like
the
te1
is
very
kind
of
full
and
a
bit
messy,
and
also
that
we
have
our,
you
know
we're
launching
a
token
economy
so
that
it
will
be
important
to
have
our
own,
especially
for
onboarding
and
the
reward
systems
which
will
change
after
the
hatch.
But
for
now
we
are
tracking
with
like
trades
in
all
this.
A
F
A
A
A
A
A
You
know,
there's
gonna
be
a
bit
of
an
adjustment
period
like
hosting
calls
on
the
new
ones.
Are
we
gonna
then
delete
all
the
channels
like
these
are
just
kind
of
small
details,
but
that
need
to
be
worked
out.
So
I
guess,
if
there's
anyone
willing
to
like
support
and
just
talking
through
these
kind
of
things
and
looking
ahead
a
bit,
because
it
would
be
nice
if
that
was
all
established
and
decided
for
this
cords
ready
in
that,
so
it
doesn't
get
too
messy
and
sticky.
F
G
A
A
A
We're
discussing
right
now
that
we're
gonna
migrate
to
a
new
discord
in
some
time.
Once
it's
ready
to
answer
your
question,
marco,
it
is
on
the
github
board
and
there
is
a
document.
It
is
not
complete
yet
so
yeah
again,
this
is
kind
of
like
yeah.
This
is
work,
that's
been
ongoing,
but
now
it's
coming
to
be
a
priority.
A
A
I
feel
like
it
would
better
than
me
trying
to
collect
feedback
from
everyone.
It
would
be
helpful
to
have
somebody
who's
like
owning
the
discord,
migration
or
somebody
owning
like
jake,
is
like
owning
the
forum,
and
then
he
can
ask
me
if
he
needs
something.
So
basically
I
own
everything
that
no
one
else
owns
in
trying
to
get
it
done
so
yeah.
I
guess
I'm
asking
if
somebody.
C
I
A
I
A
A
A
B
E
I
imagine
she's,
probably
the
most
important
stakeholder
for
a
lot
of
the
little
details
about
the
migration
and
who
knows
maybe
she
would
be
like
no
don't
migrate.
Let's
just
kick
up
security
for
token
engineering
and
we'll
stay
together,
but
I
mean
bringing
in
a
a
token
situation
into
this.
Discord
would
be
a
little
rude.
I
think
so
like
it
makes
sense
to
have
separate
discords,
but
I
would
be
very
curious
to
hear
what
angela
wants.
A
Marco
is
this
something
you're
interested
to
support
at
all?
I
know
you
said
you're
I
mean
I
know
you're
just
coming
into
the
first
meeting
here
and
but
I
maybe
you
don't
have
to
decide
now.
I'm
just
gonna
like
I'm
gonna,
go
through
and
tag
some
of
the
shoes
with,
like
you
know,
could
you
support
or
needs
owner,
but
yeah?
That's
a
good
point.
Griff.
Thanks
for
the
reminder.
D
I
A
Oh
okay,
are
we
looking
for
a
moderator
we're
going
to
have
community
moderation
for
the
discord
server?
So
I
mean
we'll
be
looking
at
a
few
different
solutions,
and
that's
more
so.
The
conflict
resolution
working
group
may
be
is
to
have
some
moderators
and
people
that
have
a
role
to
like
moderate
the
server
for
supporting
new
members
or
answering
questions,
or
you
know
keeping
an
eye
on
like
spam
or
trolling
of
things
like
this.
So
we.
C
A
I
think
I'm
gonna
select
this
one.
The
stories
roadmap,
I'm
just
refining
that
a
bit
and
then
next
week
we'll
look
at
the
tagline
exercise
that
I
wanted
to
do,
which
yeah
we're
just
revisiting
the
narrative.
I
mean
we
have
like
a
one-liner
and
we
have
the
story
that
was
in
the
kickoff
article,
but
obviously
that
was
written
last
september.
A
A
A
Maybe
like
30
minutes
of
the
meeting
to
kind
of
look
at
the
one
liner
or
the
tagline
that
we're
using
and
revisit
that
along
with,
we
had
the
story,
cameras
exercise
and
I
went
back
through
it
and
actually
I
think
it
was
kind
of
all
over
the
map.
So
I
wanted
to
in
our
place
now
a
couple
of
months
later.
Look
at
that
again,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
time.
A
As
I
mentioned,
you
know
and
as
a
few
others
mentioned
looking
at
the
different
narratives
and
what
nate
mentioned
as
well,
and
maybe
nate.
If
you
want
to
give
some
feedback
on
this
as
well,
so
the
common
stack
is
kind
of
holding
this
huge
vision
of
these
patterns
and
templates
that
any
community
can
come
and
fund
themselves
and
govern
themselves
and
that's
all
public
goods.
So
that
could
be
anything
whereas
the
tec
is
focused
specifically
on
te
public
goods
and
the
standards
of
this
emerging
transdisciplinary
field.
A
So
we,
the
orange,
is
cec.
So
we
kind
of
did
a
brainstorm
with
the
common
set
group
on
you
know
what
is
the
tc
all
about
and
we
came
up
with
this
roadmap
of
things
that
we
need
to
revisit.
So
one
of
them
is
the
one
liner.
So
I'm
going
to
dedicate
time
next
week
to
that,
and
then
we
have
our
ongoing.
You
know
news
updates,
but
as
far
as
story
pieces,
the
plan
was
now
that
the
legal
vote
has
been
completed.
A
F
Particularly,
what
actually
is
it
contributes
towards
the
idea
of
creating
economies
around
public
goods
and
creating
new
incentives
around
public
goods.
What
its
role
is
for
not
only
the
commonstack
association
but
for
future
hatches
and
how
it's
going
to
actually,
you
know,
be
a
system
that
models
and
hu
and
helps
other
hatches
be
developed
on
top
of
it,
at
least
for
that's
from
my
understanding.
E
E
I
think
we
really
need
to
kick
up
the.
What
is
token
engineering?
Why
is
it
important
why
what
are
public
goods
inside
of
it?
Why
do
public
goods
matter
in
token
engineering,
and
why
does
everybody
you
know
need
to
be?
Why
do
all
the
token
engineers
need
to
actually
participate
in
this?
If
it's
just
to
be
a
guinea
pig
for
other
economies,
you
know
that's
cool,
we'll
get
the
common
stack
crew,
but
if
it's
to
actually
you
know,
be
a
molecule
for
token
engineering,
but
with
it,
but
with
positive
incentives.
E
A
Yeah
next
week,
I
I
want
to
just
table
all
of
the
housekeeping
stuff
and
the
github
like
next
week,
so
that
we
can
go
deeper
into
this
because
I
feel
like
this
is
the
discussion
I
want
to
bounce
around
and
do
some
mural
boarding
with
where
this
week
I
just
like,
we
came
back.
You
know
first
week
in
the
new
year
I
organized
all
this
stuff
with
tamara.
Now
it's
kind
of
like
okay.
A
We
have
all
these
tasks
and
all
these
issues
that
are
a
lot
of
work
that
you
know
would
be
great
for
a
few
people
to
take
on
and
like.
Thank
you
so
much
for
you
know
everybody
who's,
stepping
in
you
know
jake
and
nate
for
for
offering
your
time
so
yeah.
This
is
like
a
huge
discussion
and
for
me
it's
like
this
is
definitely
a
process,
and
so
part
of
getting
into
this
was
writing
this.
What
are
we
funding
post?
A
So
this
is
getting
more
clear
on
like
what
are
we
actually
funding
and
then
yeah?
It
starts
to
like
become
pieces
for
that
larger
story,
but
yeah.
I
think
this
is
a
discussion
for
for
next
week.
So
next
week
come
with
your
pencils
and
pens
or
your
mirror
board,
and
I
will
make
sure
that
these
links
get
updated
in
the
manifesto
and
then
I
send
them
to
everybody
ahead
of
time.
So
everybody
can
be
prepared
to
jump
in
on
that,
because
I
want
to
take
this
and
take
this
and
kind
of
spend.
A
Maybe
you
know
20
minutes
on
the
tagline
and
another
20
30
minutes
on
bouncing
around
deeper
discussions
on
kind
of
what
griff's
talking
about,
but
but
distilling
that
to
a
very
practical,
you
know
bullet
points
and
applying
that
to
writing
so
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much
everybody
who
got
a
jump
for
top
hour
and
again
I
apologize
for
being
late.
That's
never
happened.
I
was
deep
into
the
story
matrix
and
yeah.
It's
definitely
a
process.