►
Description
Check out our notes here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UTNNyYLf6WC1wlytoU9IJ46z2I32NX0MrtJOs3j9Ahw/edit
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Yes,
yes,
okay,
if
it
goes
out
just
hopefully
I'll
hear
you
so
yeah
we'll
go
ahead
and
start
with
a
round
of
check-ins
just
about
30
seconds,
yeah
how's
everybody
doing
kind
of
open
sharing.
Here
I
will
start
so.
We
met
paul
stamets,
the
very
famous
mushroom
grower
when
we
were
on
cortez
island.
So
that
was
a
pretty
fun
time.
B
A
E
F
Hello,
everyone
I'm
excited
to
be
here:
I've
been
working
towards
a
draft
for
a
conflict
resolution
program
for
the
tec,
so
and
hope
everyone
can
like
join
in
the
discussion,
and
I
had
that
talk
with
grief
on
sunday.
So
that
gave
me
some
ideas
to
make
it
simple
and
also
I've
been
seeing
fabian
in
the
blockchain
lab
that
was
in
the
future
law
summit.
So
it
was
very
interesting
and
I
will
pass
it
to
umberto.
G
Thanks
juan
for
all
your
effort,
it's
been
really
nice
to
see
that
just
narrowed
down,
that's
impressive!
Also,
I'm
doing
good
here
is
night.
I
have
I've
been
having
a
a
nice
but
tough
week
with
exam
with
an
exam
coming,
so
everything
good.
I
I
just
have
doubts
on
the
on
the
click
up.
If,
if
it's
needed,
maybe
we
can
just
do
the
follow-up
of
stuff
in
notion.
Maybe
that
will
be
easier
and
well.
We
can
just
later
talk
about
that.
H
Hi
everyone
great
to
be
here.
As
always.
Let
me
just
turn
on
my
camera,
so
you
can
see
my
face
then
helping
out
with
the
forum
also
with
the
landing
page
during
the
weekend.
Actually
I
got
the
landing
page
ready
and
actually
I
can
just
share
a
little
bit
with
you
if
you
guys
want-
and
I've
been
at
the
same
time,
working
on
the
acknowledgement
and
acknowledgement
mechanisms
for
five
pandemics.
H
Yeah
it's
been,
it's
been
a
bless.
I
have
been
receiving
a
lot
of
support,
so
it's
it's
very
exciting.
So
yeah
here's
a
little
preview
of
what
I've
been
working
on
and
yeah.
We
got
already
a
domain
and
we
have
everything
running
well
still,
but
yeah
I'm
excited
so
yeah.
I
passed
it
to
jeff,
okay,
jeff
left.
C
E
J
You
hi
everyone,
I'm
excited
to
be
here,
I
think,
is
the
first
time
I
come
to
a
communication
meeting,
I'm
just
amazed
by
all
the
stuff
that's
going
on
in
this
group,
and
I
wanted
to
just
come
in
and
and
see
firsthand
how
everything
is.
Is
evolving?
I'm
really
excited
about
all
the
stuff
that
you
guys
are
doing.
A
K
K
L
L
That
eventually
goes
towards
creating
a
kind
of
a
legislative
framework
for
us
to
operate
in
a
in
a
crypto
space
safely,
because
I
don't
think
we
should
rely
on
traditional
structures
because
they're
too
flawed
and
I'm
in
the
process
of
getting
a
visa
to
bali
by
the
end
of
the
month.
So
that's
exciting
for
me
all
right
check.
D
B
We've
got
a
lot
to
cover,
so
I'm
gonna
plow
ahead
and
thankfully
we
just
drove
to
the
library
so
signals
should
be
good.
Now.
Thank
you
again
for
everyone
joining.
So
hopefully
everybody
can
access
the
agenda.
It
is
in
the
tec
comms
channel.
If
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
jump
in
and
make
sure
I've
listed,
your
name
as
well
under
the
call
agenda
so
that
we
can
praise
you
for
attending.
B
So
first
going
through
the
deliverables
as
quickly
as
possible,
the
newsletter
we
got
it
out
and
we'll
discover
we'll
talk
about
some
learnings
in
just
a
minute,
but
I
am
going
to
be
working
with
livy.
There's
a
praise
meeting
this
friday.
Yes,
griffin,
livy,
okay.
So
if
anyone
wants
to
join
this
is
really
interesting
to
see
how
the
praise
quantification
process
works
and
from
this
meeting
we
will
be
writing
every
two
weeks,
a
newsletter
and
kind
of
like
the
leaderboard
of
the
praise.
B
So
if
anybody
would
like
to
attend
this
friday,
we
we
can
send
that
information
in
comm's
channel.
If
anybody
wants
to
join
that
process,
twitter
set
up
blair.
How
is
that
going?
So
we
blair
and
I
had
a
discussion
about
the
handle
that
and
had
a
lot
of
people
saying
tech
mns
was
not
that
easy,
but
he
found
token
edge
commons.
Was
it
blair?
Do
you
want
to
update
us
real
quick
on
what
we
need
to
move
forward
with
that.
K
D
B
B
K
B
B
H
So,
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
this
with
this
error
table
is
to
basically
list
the
names
of
the
people
that
are
contributing
to
the
token
engineering
commons
and
as
well
defining
what
are
the
different
type
of
skills
that
they
feel
they're
strong
about
and
also
listing
what
are
the
different
projects
that
they're
engaged
with,
or
the
different
soup
projects
that
they're
engaged
with
within
the
token
engineering,
commons
and
yeah.
That's
basically,
the
idea.
B
B
So
we
can
all
just
have
visibility
into
what
we're
doing,
as
we
still
figure
out
the
like
project
management
processes
that
we're
all
going
to
be
using-
and
I
know
click
up
is
on
the
way
from
gov-
is
working
on
some
other
project
management
wizardry.
So
this
is
the
process
we're
working
on,
but
for
now
at
least
we'll
have
everybody
mapped
and
everybody
can
see
kind
of
where
everybody's
at
and
ask
questions
and
whatnot
so
perfect
website.
A
H
I
think
that
maybe
the
confusion
is
on
on
click
up
and
click
up
is
just
gonna,
be
a
tool
for
tracking
time
yeah
about
the
different
contributions
that
we're
doing,
and
I
think
that
this
is
not
set
in
stone.
Yet
umberto
and
a
couple
of
other
people
are
basically
coming
up
with
the
whole
idea
and
the
whole
proposal
for
the
team.
G
That
wasn't
not
only
for
tracking
time,
it
was
for
breaking
up
down
the
structure
of
tasks
so
that
we
could
divide
a
project,
a
bigger
project,
into
small
tasks,
tasks
and
let's
say
that
I
don't
know
how
to
do
a
bigger
thing.
But
I
know
how
to
do
this
specific
task,
so
I
can
commit
assign
myself
to
that
task
and
that
will
be
better
and
will
be
easier
for
people
to
onboard
without
having
to
know
everything.
G
But
it
has
been
a
little
trouble
to
to
get
together
like
to
explain
how
does
it
work,
and
maybe
we
just
don't
need
that.
But
that's
what
we
need
like
15
minutes
to
talk
about
that
with
a
mirror
sharing
my
screen,
and
maybe
I
can
explain
you
how
it
works,
and
you
tell
yes,
this
works
for
us
or
now.
Let's
do
it
in
ocean
and
that's
it.
B
A
B
The
notion
requires
quite
a
a
hefty
subscription
fee.
Is
my
understanding,
maybe
not,
I
think
it's
like
10
bucks,
a
person,
but
when
we
may
have
like
you
know
who
knows
like
dozens
of
people
so
yeah,
I
guess
maybe
in
the
stewart's
meeting
we
can
address
this,
and
maybe
we
can
have
a
poll
of
like
what
project
management
tools,
people
like
I'm
open
to
whatever
we
want
to
use,
but
I
totally
agree
with
you:
a
thousand
percent
olivia.
B
So
we
need
a
solution
for
this,
so
maybe
we
can
identify
it
as
a
challenge
or
problem,
but
yeah.
We
definitely
need
to
all
have
the
working
groups
in
one
spot.
I
don't
feel
attached
to
any
platform,
so
we
can.
Can
we
table
that
one
and
come
out
with
like
a
survey
or
an
async
solution
to
figure
that
out?
Does
that
work.
B
B
So
we
can
like
push
to
get
the
website
and
griff
and
tech
team
are
kicking
ass,
so
we
need
to
keep
up
with
them.
So
if
anybody
has
any
strong
feedback
about
the
logo,
please
send
me
a
direct
message
and
I've
been
doing
my
best
to
integrate
everybody's
feedback,
but
otherwise
you've
had
a
first
look
sneak
peek
awesome.
I
super
love
it.
I
can
even
share
one
mock
up
marco
did.
That
was
like
on
a
wall
I
sent
it
to
griff,
it
looks
like
banksy
or
something
it's
pretty
rad.
B
Okay,
so
that's
the
logo,
which
a
lot
of
our
platforms
are
kind
of
hung
up
and
waiting
on.
So
hopefully
we
can
wrap
that
in
the
next
day
or
two
and
then
we
have
blair-
and
I
spent
some
time
last
week,
working
on
some
website
website,
content
manu
or
blair.
Do
you
have
updates
for
website
end
setup
and
how
we
would
like
to
move
forward
with
that?
I
was
thinking.
Maybe
we
do
a
kick
off
work
session
tomorrow
or
thursday.
B
B
B
Okay,
awesome,
I
know
I'm
so
sorry,
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it,
we're
out
we're
out
in
the
forest
this
weekend,
but
thank
you
so
much
for
hauling
so
fast
on
that,
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
that
once
my
internet
is
functioning
tomorrow,
we're
back
to
mainland
awesome,
oh
yeah,
and
then
I
saw
you
guys
also
set
up
the
forum.
Can
you
update
on
that
as.
M
D
Oh,
we
lost
mono
too
well.
What
I
can
say
is,
I
know
that
it's
still
a
work
in
progress.
We
we've
overcome
the
technical
barriers,
but
I
don't
think
that
I
don't
I'm
pretty
sure
we
don't
have
anything
to
show
people,
but
the
infrastructure
is
finally
there
so,
and
that
was
a
battle,
but
so
we're
going
forward
with
it
and
it's
a
it's
something
that
we're
hoping
to
use
for
communicating
the
tech,
spec
group
as
well.
B
B
B
C
C
That's
still
a
work
in
progress
still
following
up
with
people
individually
and
I'll
need
to
sync
up
likely
with
griff
or
just
get
a
new
pull
off
that
spreadsheet
and
I'll
just
keep
working
on
that
and
keep
following
up
with
people.
It's
been
nice
to
interact
with
people
virtually
individually
as
opposed
to
in
larger
group
settings.
So
I
think
it's
going
well.
D
Just
just
a
really
quick
thing
on
that:
one
of
the
things
that
is
limiting
our
ability
to
get
some
people
who
have
filled
out
the
form
is
that
they
say
that
they
are
do
not
want
to
have
their
name
publicly
linked,
and
so
I'm
deleting
all
those
when
I
I
did
update
the
form
and
when
they,
but
when
they
say
that
they're
not
willing
to
be
public
with
their
address
then
and
have
their
name
linked.
Then
then
I
I
I
can't
share
that
data.
D
B
Okay,
that's
good
to
know,
and
so
do
you
think
we
need
to
say
anything
to
those
people
just
like
there's
a
reputation
token!
That's
why
it's
public
or
add
anything
to
the
survey
or
like
should
craig
then
go
back
to
those
people
and
be
like
hey.
Actually,
we
need
that
because
this
is
a
reputation
token.
That's
the
whole
point
and
it's
totally
up
to
you
no
pressure,
but
just
so
you
know
why,
because
like
just
as
a
single
question
on
the
forum,
there's
not
really
any
context.
B
C
Yeah,
it's
been
good
and
I'll
work
with
griff
and
you
know
definitely
have
been
trying
to
communicate
the
public
nature
of
signing
up
and
how
things
are
currently
configured
and
that's.
We
need
that
linkage
and
totally
respecting
people
that
do
not
want
their
address
linked.
So
there's
been
a
lot
of
questions
and
a
lot
of
conversation,
so
it's
been
good.
B
Us
very
cool,
okay,
I'm
gonna
quickly
try
to
wrap
the
deliverables.
So
then
we
can
hear
from
griff
because
that'll
be
about
10
minutes
and
then
we'll
see
how
we
can
go
for
the
story.
Canvas
so
next
things,
onboarding,
video
and
tl.
Dr
that's
on
my
list
for
this
week,
in
addition
to
youtube
setup
because
we're
already
starting
to
get
recordings
for
the
calls.
So
I'm
gonna
work
on
setting
up
the
youtube
this
week
and
then
I'm
gonna
start
the
document
for
onboarding
video,
and
I
think
that
should
be.
B
You
know
not
take
so
long
to
figure
out
a
plan
for
that.
I
and
whoever
wants
to
volunteer
basically
will
just
be
like
one-liners
and
a
bunch
of
different
faces
of
reading
to
like
welcome
people
in
a
video
to
the
channel
and
so
yeah
I'll,
send
directions
and
all
that
once
we
move
a
little
bit
further.
B
B
So
if
we
can
table
that
for
next
week,
but
I
just
want
to
mention
humberto
put
together
this
really
rad
like
news
proposal
and
I
have
a
tv
background
and
was
a
producer
and
he
looks
like
a
producer
the
way
he
put
it
all
together
like
time
blocking
out
the
news
in
like
either
a
podcast
or,
however.
So
I
think
this
will
be
super
fantastic,
but
it's
kind
of
a
nice
to
have
right
now
like
more
for
the
launch
or
when
we
can
iterate
to
that
point.
B
But
I
just
want
to
mention
and
like
honor
you
for
putting
in
the
time-
and
I
hope
that
we
can
give
you
the
time
to
present
that
next
week,
awesome,
okay,
so
next
thing
and
I'm
gonna
try
to
time
box
it
to
five
minutes.
If
we
can
is
to
get
an
update
on
the
tech
spec
and
share
a
little
bit
for
everyone
to
gain
some
of
the
learnings,
when
we
were
writing
the
praise,
you
guys
all
saw
the
blog
posts.
B
We
had
some
learnings
while
we
were
writing
that
and
how
to
communicate,
because
it
is
a
little
challenging
right
now,
because,
basically,
this
whole
seastack
and
tec,
and
what
is
the
difference
between
the
common
stack
and
tec?
Are
they
merging
people
are
asking?
What's
the
deal
with
tokens
and
the
thing
is,
we
can't
answer
a
lot
of
these
questions
because
the
community
will
vote
so
I'm
gonna,
let
griff
take
this
on
and
just
share
a
bit
of
a
tech
spec
update
and
we
need
to
be
the
like.
B
D
Okay,
there's
a
lot
there,
so
so
the
common
stack
token
is
a
non-transferable
token.
That's
kind
of
like
a
reputation
score
for
people
who
we're
just
trying
to
curate
a
group
of
trusted
people
that
are
value
driven,
not
profit,
driven
or
at
least
not
solely
profit
driven.
You
know
so
that
people
feel
good
about,
including
these
group
of
people
that
are
not
just
going
to
pump
and
dump
your
coin
right.
D
So
because
of
that-
and
it's
already
there-
it's
kind
of
easy
to
just
use
it
for
the
token
engineering
commons.
In
fact,
it's
kind
of
its
purpose.
So
that's
the
c
stack
token,
but
the
the
the
token
engineering
commons
may
not
may
want
to
include
other
people
like
when
the
onboarding
working
group
comes
in
and
they
say,
hey
like
we
need
to
onboard
these
different
groups.
D
We
need
certain
people
who
are
going
to
provide
funding
and
strong
governance
and
make
good
decision
making,
and
these
are
this
group
of
people
and
then
we
have
these
projects
that
also
want
to
use
the
funding
and,
to
you
know,
provide
token
engineering
public
goods.
Maybe
both
of
these
groups
need
to
be
included
in
the
hatch
and
they're,
not
holding
c
stack
tokens.
D
It's
more
just
a
list
of
people
that
are
able
to
buy
into
the
hatch
that
would
include
c-stack
token
holders
and
other
people.
This
is
a
decision
that
hasn't
been
made
yet
so
we
have
to
wait
until
the
legal
working
group
and
onboarding
working
group
can
coordinate
with
everyone
to
make
make
these
decisions.
So,
hey
ambiguity:
what
do
we
do?
Who
knows?
That's
your
job.
You
guys
got
to
communicate
that.
Thank
you
and
then
the
other
piece
is
the
tech
spec.
D
So
I've
been
working
with
he's,
not
here,
but
daihi
dahi,
who
helped
me
with
the
tech
spec
a
little
bit
and
sam,
obviously,
in
the
whole
one
hive
crew
to
actually
pull
out
the
parameters
that
we're
using
for
this
first
test
and
define
them
and
list
them
in
a
way
that
a
normal
person
can
read
and
be
informed
on
what
is
possible
to
tweak
and
then
with
the
experience
of
playing
with
it.
And
this
like
handbook
of
what
the
parameters
are.
D
Once
we
have
the
forum
up,
we
can
start
discussing
the
impacts
of
different
parameters
and
what
can
we
can
choose
and
people
will
have
this
foundation
where
they
can
dig
if
they,
if
they're
curious-
and
they
want
to.
You
know-
be
part
of
the
decision
making
process
of
what
parameters
we
use
for
this
token
economy.
So
that's
the
tech,
spec
working
group
and
I
think
my
five
minutes
is
up.
B
Awesome
thanks
so
much
griff
and
I
really
want
to
allow
time
for
questions
as
well.
However,
we're
trying
to
get
to
the
story
canvas,
so
I
think
maybe
we
can
have
some
discussion
around
this
in
the
weekly
sync,
like
a
q,
a
a
little
bit
or
what
may
be
better
is
that
we
start
developing
an
faq,
but
for
right
now
the
narrative
that
we're
kind
of
said
in
writing.
B
So
these
are
like
our
ecosystem.
Friends
at
one
hive.
These
are
people
in
our
own
community,
any
of
you.
She
might
reach
out
to
you
to
understand,
like
the
people
who
want
to
hold
these
tokens
to
contribute
to
the
commons.
What
are
they
looking
for
like?
What
are
you
hoping
to
get
out
of
this,
and
with
this
understanding
we
can
develop
the
best
model
possible.
B
A
D
B
D
B
B
H
It's
sadly,
it's
not
enough
time,
but
I
hope
I
hope
we
can
make
some
progress
here.
Well,
the
idea
of
the
soy
canvas
is
to
basically
define
what
are
the
different
type
of
audiences
that
we're
going
to
be
targeting.
What
is
it?
What
is
the
kind
of
purpose
that
is
bringing
us
together,
where
the
different
key
messages
call
to
actions
stories,
different
type
of
possible
campaigns?
What
are
the
outcomes
and
what
are
the
indicators
or
kpis
that
we
want
to
track?
H
So
yeah
here
is
basically
all
the
description
about
the
different
sections
within
the
campus
and
sadly
I
don't
think
that
we
have
enough
time
to
go
through
it
and
then
review
it.
But
what
I
would
suggest
is
that
we
actually
put
some
some
time
into
this
and
next
meeting
we
review
it
and
we
have
it
or
maybe
during
the
week
we
review
it
so
yeah.
That's
that's
what
I
would
suggest.
What
do
you
guys
think.
E
H
I
share
with
you
again:
let
me
just
share
my
screen,
so
you
can
see
it
it's
in
the
token
engineering
commons
channel
one
second,
let
me
share
my
screen
here:
the
tecom's
channel
yeah,
so
you
go
here
and
you
see
the
tc
comps
channel.
Okay,
thank
you!
No
problem!
So
yeah.
I
see
that
there's
a
couple
of
people
already
there
so
yeah.
As
I
said,
instead
of
focusing
our
time
here,
we
should
focus
on
time
here
in
the
hatching
yeah.
H
So
I'm
sure
that
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
we
can
take
from
from
here
from
this.
So
if
you
want
to
have
a
quick
look,
feel
free
to
do
so,
but
remember
maybe
griff.
If
you
can
give
us
an
idea
about
what
what
is
the
goal
of
the
hatching?
That
would
be.
That
would
be
even
I.
I
would
say
that
that
would
be
very,
very
helpful.
D
Yeah,
so
I
would
say,
hey
feel
free
to
go
in
there.
While
I
rant
for
like
two
minutes
and
just
start
writing
things
in
he
manu
has
a
really
nice
explainer
of
each
box.
Just
pick
a
box
and-
and
if
you
think
you
know
some
things,
start
writing
we
have
15
minutes
and
and
a
bunch
of
really
awesome
brains
focusing
in
on
this
board.
D
So
to
to
deal
with
that
imbalance
opportunity,
we
have
a
couple
of
limitations
for
the
for
the
first
buy
of
the
bonding
curve
to
initialize
the
bonding
curve
number
one.
It's
a
big
bulk
buy,
so
everyone
gets
the
same
price
instead
of
just
like.
Oh
anyone
can
buy
in
and
then
the
price
goes
up.
Everyone
gets
the
same
price,
and
this
is-
and
this
is
part
of
the
hatch-
also
to
mitigate
the
benefits
of
being
the
first
buyer
and
getting
a
super
cheap
price
and
a
guaranteed
profit.
D
Almost
we
have
a
heavy
vesting
requirement.
So
when
you
buy
into
the
hatch
there
will
be
a
period
of
time
which
this
will
be
voted
on
by
our
community.
It's
called
the
cliff
where
a
hundred
percent
of
the
tokens
are
vested
are
have
a
vesting
requirement.
They're
locked
they're
not
invested
it's
a
locking
thing,
so
the
tokens
are
locked.
You
can't
sell
them.
D
You
can't
sell
them
into
the
curve,
but
you
do
get
them
super
cheap.
So,
in
the
hatch
when
you
buy
in
the
hatch,
price
might
be
5
cents
and
the
price
at
the
end
will
be
10
cents,
and
you
can
see
this
on
the
common
stack
website
exactly
why
this
is
it's
kind
of
like.
When
you
buy
into
the
hatch
you
get
the
average
price
which
is
from
zero
to
ten
cents.
D
You
get
five
cents
or
something
maybe
it's
three
cents
whatever
depends
on
our
curve
and
you
get
that
average
price
and
the
final
price
is
going
to
be
higher.
So
this
is
a
very
interesting
dynamic
that
is
very
exciting
for
people
who
to
buy
in
because
you
almost
you
can
see
a
direct
you
know
benefit,
but
to
mitigate
that
when
people
buy
into
the
hatch,
not
all
of
them,
funds
go
to
create
the
economy.
D
In
fact,
this
is
the
great
thing
about
what
we
can
do
with
this
dynamic
is
we
can
divert
some
funds
to
go
into
the
funding
pool.
The
funding
pool
is
like
the
classical
donation
stream.
So
it's
like
the
pot
of
funds
that
the
token
holders
get
to
govern
that
they
can
use
to
fund
public
goods
in
the
token
engineering
space.
D
So
when
people
buy
into
the
hatch,
some
percentage
of
the
funds
will
go
to
the
economy,
some
percentage
of
the
funds
will
go
to
the
funding
pool
and
the
hatch
dynamic.
The
hash
culture
is
going
to
be
limited,
so
we're
not
going
to
let
anyone
buy
into
the
hatch.
We
don't
need
to
promote
this
to
the
world.
We
only
need
to
promote
it
to
the
token
engineers
that
and
and
the
community
that's
on
the
white
list,
and
so
those
I
feel
like
that's
enough
perspective.
What
do
you
think
manu.
H
D
The
people
who
buy
into
the
hatch
are
going
to
be
the
whales
of
the
commons
and
that's
just
the
way
it
is
so
these
are
the
people
who
end
up
with
the
most
governance
decisions
they
end
up
with
the
most
skin
in
the
game,
so
we
are
looking
very
specifically
to
exclude
profit
seeking,
pump
and
dump.
You
know
d5
bros.
The
chads
are
not
welcome
in
this
comments.
D
So
it's
not
like
it's
not
like
one
person
is,
is
not
a
multiple
multitude
of
like
archetypes
right
so,
but
the
archetype
that
we
need
to
promote
and
the
opinion
and-
and
the
thing
that
we
need
to
make
sure
people
understand-
is
that
if
you
buy
into
the
hatch,
you
need
to
be
focused
on
actually
providing
value
towards
public
the
public
goods
that
token
engineering
can
create.
So
that
needs
to
be
the
focus
of
the
people
who
come
into
the
hatch
they
need
to
understand.
D
L
L
L
Well,
I
mean
the
the
the
dynamics
that
you
just
outlined
to
basically
prevent
the
problem
of
whales
and
and
create
an
alternative
to
that.
We
I
I've,
worked
in
a
similar
area
in
2017,
where
we
wanted
to
do
a
launch
and
we
didn't,
but
but
but
there
was
a
lot
of
considerations
that
went
into
that
and
it's
something
that
I'm
very
curious
and
would
like
to
contribute,
because
mainly
because
it
never
really.
D
Yeah
that'll
be
the
onboarding,
that's
the
onboarding
working
group,
mostly
they're,
the
probably
the
ones
that
are
deep,
diving
into
this.
It's
going
to
be
a
tough
thing
to
do,
because
what
we'll
end
up
doing
is
saying:
hey
here's,
how
many
tokens
you
can
buy,
like
everyone
will
be
given
kind
of
a
max
that
they
can
purchase,
and
it's
going
to
be
based
off
of
their
the
tokens.
D
The
c
stack
tokens
that
they
have
or
the
tech
tokens
that
they
have
the
tec
hatch
tokens
that
that
they
have
so
depending
on
different
people's
trust
levels.
Different
people
will
be
able
to
have
a
whale
roll
if
they
choose
to
put
skin
in
the
game
right
because
there
is
this
limp.
There
needs
to
be
this
balance
between,
like
the
you
know,
we
want
to
have.
D
L
D
L
I
I
understand
it's
very
much
in
the
onboarding,
for
this
particular
hatch,
but
what
I
was
expressing
my
curiosity
was
more
to
pursue
that
kind
of
direction,
because
I
believe
that
that
whole
approach
is
is
much
much
much
richer,
even
though
you
know
it's
an
amazing
step
in
the
first
direction.
But
what
comes
after
that?
Like
for
future
iterations?
That's
basically,
where
my
interest
is
so.
D
D
I
actually
look
at
it
and
we
say:
oh,
is
this
person
like
you
know?
How
credible
is
this
person?
How
much
information
do
we
have
that
this
person
is
value
driven
over
profit,
driven
and
and
we
we
give
a
subjective
trust
score
to
every
applicant
and
that
enables
them
like
the
highest
trust
score
is
like
simon
de
la
ruvier,
who
invented
the
token
bonding
curve
right
like
he
can.
He
can
have
ten
percent
of
the
token
engineering
comment
he
can
have
ten
percent
of
the
c-stack
yeah.
B
So
sorry,
we've
got
four
minutes
left
and
I
wanted
to
be
able
to
do
checkouts
and
rap,
and
this
is
really
important
dialogue.
So
I
think
I
mean
this
is
going
into
the
hard
of
gov
discussion
of
you
know,
quadratic
conviction,
voting.
A
lot
of
these
things
are
still
being
modeled,
but
maybe
we
do
need
a
channel
for
that.
B
So,
let's
think
about
where
we
can
start
to
document
this
and
yeah
onboarding
group,
I
guess,
is
the
primary
but
yeah
we
have
some
documentation
to
do
in
looking
at
some
of
the
different
options
in
fabian
would
love
to
have
your
feedback
in
one.
I
see
you
putting
your
hand
up,
so
maybe
we
can
start
a
document
or
yeah.
I
will
think
with
ange
and
we
can
start
just
keep
going
in
the
comms
channel
or
let's
come
up
with
a
way
that
we
can
express
these
ideas
and
start
to
put
them
together.
B
So
I
hear
you
and
juan.
I
want
to
hear
what
you're
saying
but
yeah,
sadly
we're
always
on
crunch.
We've
got
four
minutes,
so
quick,
checkouts
thanks
everybody.
I
feel
this
is
super
productive.
I
wish
we
could
go
longer.
We
can
keep
thinking
about
maybe
making
this
a
little
longer
or
having
a
meeting
where
we
discuss
some
of
the
have
an
open
meeting
or
q
and
a's
with
griff.
So
I
passed
to
dante,
quick.
H
Okay,
yeah,
just
just
to
clarify
we're
gonna,
go
back
to
the
mirror
board
whenever
you
guys
want,
but
we're
gonna
review
it
together,
hopefully
next
week,
but
yeah
just
go.
There
help
us
out
with
that
and
yeah.
If
you
have
any
questions
reach
out
to
griff,
he
knows
way
more
how
the
whole
system
would
work
and
yeah.
Let's
get
it.
Let's
get
it
done,
and
thanks
everyone
for
contributing.
D
I'll
take
the
next.
Thank
you
guys
so
much
for
this
sorry
for
ranting
and
feel
free
to
do
this
mirror
board
during
the
soft
gov
call.
You
know
at
the
beginning
we're
just
doing
intros
and
that'll
be
nice,
it
it's
a
great
multitasking
and
we
need
as
much
manu
and
the
team
can
use
as
much
of
this
data
as
possible.
It's
really
critical
for
us
to
design
the
right
system
for
communicating
these
ideas.
So
thank
you
guys
for
listening
to
me,
rant
and
I'll
pass
it
to
olivia.
A
Yeah
great
call
everyone
and
all
of
these
topics
that
were
coming
up.
They
are
directly
related
to
the
onboarding
working
group
and
some
of
them
are
already
being
looked
at
and
we'll
have
an
overview
in
the
soft
gov
of
what
the
word
the
onboarding
working
group
is
up
to,
since
they
are
somehow
correlated
so
so
yeah.
I
see
you
guys
there
in
a
minute.
E
E
K
M
Yeah,
hey
thanks.
Everyone
awesome
call
incredible
work.
It's
I
love
the
high
speed
collaboration
and
everyone's
super
on
point.
So
it's
nice
to
see
everyone
coming
out.
I
think
this
group,
amongst
what
I've
been
tracking
in
the
whole
crypto
emergence
world,
is
on
the
right
track
and
I
yeah
there's
some
innovative
ideas
here
that
I
don't
see
anywhere
else
and
I
think
that's
why
we
get
this
attraction
of
this
sort
of
high
caliber
talent,
everyone
bringing
a
lot
to
the
table.
So
it's
an
honor
to
be
here
and
yeah
thanks.
Everyone.
C
D
F
I
It
that
that's
cool,
juan
carlos,
I
I'm
definitely
looking
forward
to
to
have
a
look
in
in
that
document
for
conflict,
wrestle
resolutions
and
and
and
give
a
hand
if,
if
you
see,
I
can
help
you
somewhere
and
just
to
close
this,
I
just
have
to
say
that
I'm
super
excited
about
this
being
shaped.
This
is
my
first
like
full
token
engineering,
commons
meetings
and
yeah,
I'm
just
remembering
last
year
talking
with
grief
in
barcelona
when
I
was
asking
yeah
agrees,
but
what
is
the
first
commons?