►
Description
Notes from the call:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-EcsTmgDP7CehSzZMWvdAQ8as-EKL-Kl9wPKM5t9ln4/edit
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
B
C
D
Yeah,
so
actually
I'm
here
to
kind
of
catch
up,
because
I
I
heard
that
there
are
a
lot
of
interesting
things
happening,
but
I
haven't
been
really
connected
the
past
few
weeks
or
maybe
few
months
so
yeah,
I'm
just
here
to
listen
and
you
know
really
curious.
What's
going
on
and
I
see
just
initials
so
yeah,
I
love
you
so
maybe
I'll
just
pass
it
to
griff,
because
that's
the
only
person
I
can
recognize.
B
B
I
also
think
that
we've
been
doing
well
at
getting
some
structures
in
place
to
kind
of
temporarily
structure
ourselves,
and
I
think
we've
we've
done
really
well
on
just
like
keeping
a
standard
progress
like
a
train
just
always
moving
forward,
and
even
if
something
like
gets
hung
up.
We
just
keep
like
pushing
forward,
and
I
I
I
see
that
as
a
real
big
success,
I'll
pass
it
to
angela.
E
Nevertheless,
I
think
I'm
still
super
enthusiastic
about
the
comments
and
I
still
want
to
see
to
make
it
reality,
and
I
also
think
that,
even
though
we
we
had
several
iterations
now
with
the
decision
making
process,
it's
getting
better
and
better,
and
obviously
it
already
works
in
a
way
and
now
improving
from
there
is
great
and
it's
fun
all
right.
Danielle.
F
You
know
having
that
attention
on
the
decision-making
process,
although
it's
like
one
of
those
things
where
you
feel
like
you
feel
like
you're,
not
making
too
much
progress
in
the
short
term,
but
then
it
accumulates.
I
think
that's
pretty
much.
You
know,
I
think,
that's
driven
mostly
by
griff,
like
your
enthusiasm
and
your
your
drive
around
this
project.
It
really
comes
through
in
all
your
communications
and
all
the
calls
and
stuff.
So
it's
you're
an
inspiration,
dude
and
who's
that
who's.
Who
else
left
to
go?
D
G
I
think
that's
you
know
the
the
the
mark
of
a
mature
and
you
know
adaptive
organization
to
be
able
to
take
constructive
criticism
and
and
integrate
it
into.
You
know
growing
a
more
successful
community,
so
I
think
the
fact
the
way
that
this
community
has
dealt
with
you
know
critical
feedback
is
in
itself
a
positive,
a
success.
I'm
so
really
happy
to
see
that
and
yeah
also.
I
just
want
to
second
the
the
mural
boards
and
the
collective
decision
making
processes.
G
H
Yes,
so
I
would
say
a
couple
of
things:
first
kind
of
as
griff
said,
like
the
train,
there's
a
rhythm
to
it,
and
it
feels
really
nice,
it's
very
like
solid
and
there's
a
rhythm
and
it's
very
inclusive
and
open
and
feels
very
fluid
yeah.
It
doesn't
feel
like
any
resistance.
It
feels
like
when
anything
comes
up.
H
H
B
Yeah,
I
think
I
think,
oh
thank
you
yeah.
I
think
that's
great.
Thank
you
guys
for
all
the
positive
feedback.
It's
good
yeah.
We
we
definitely
have
like
angela
said
we
it's
so
easy
to
talk
about
the
things
that
are
going
poorly.
You
know
or
things
that
can
do
better
and
in
the
end,
that's
where
more
constructive.
We
can
build
better
when
we
talk
about
those
things,
but
hopefully
we
also
remember
that
you
know
things.
B
B
We
need
to
post
the
bitcoin
grants,
which
and
also
review
some
of
the
work.
That's
been
done
depending
on
how
things
go
this
weekend.
We
might
even
take
another
breather
week.
We
will
see,
but
then
next,
if
if
we
don't
take
a
breather
week
next
week
to
to
keep
continue
rehashing
on
on
our
internal
processes
for
the
cultural,
build
and
technical
build,
then
I
think
your
screen
is
not
sharing.
Oh
no,
is
it
not
okay?
Well,
let
me
refresh.
B
B
And
you
know
all
this
buildup
is
hopefully
going
to
reduce
problems
that
we'd
run
into.
If
we
didn't
do
this
build
up.
That's
that's
kind
of
the
idea,
also
just
to
review
what
the
purpose
of
this
call
is
for
everyone.
This
call
is
really
not
focused
on
discussing
specific
proposals
or
brainstorming
improvements.
B
This
call
is
more
about
showing
off
the
work
that
has
been
done
over
the
week,
making
sure
everyone's
aware
of
it
and
showing
them
where
they
can
discuss
the
proposals
and
brainstorm
improvements,
and
also
to
gather
data
that
is
valuable
from
everyone
for
the
work
that's
going
to
happen
next
week
and
also
to
collect
proposals
and
action
steps.
If
you
guys
have
the
agenda
notes
they're,
probably
linked.
Thank
you
olivia.
B
C
C
So
the
idea
is
that
we
have
a
very
simple
process
to
start
with
just
three
roles
that
would
be
community
stewards,
subject
matter
experts
and
contributors,
so
community
stewards
they
have
a
lot
of
commit.
They
have
the
most
commitment
out
of
the
roles,
so
they
put
more
or
less
like
four
hours
a
week
of
work
into
the
tac
and
subject
matter.
C
C
Onboarding
would
be
an
invitation
by
by
community
stewards
and
they
would
receive
they
would
receive
pretty
much
the
same
on-boarding
as
the
contributors,
but
a
more
detailed
explanation
of
how
they
can
make
significant
contributions,
even
if
they
don't
have
the
bandwidth
for
it
and
then
the
community
steward
onboarding
they
would
be,
they
would
be
nominated
by
two
other
community
stewards.
Whenever
someone
starts
to
participate
and
to
engage
a
lot,
they
would
be
invited
to
become
a
community
steward
and
if
they
agree,
they
would
receive
a
30-minute.
Onboarding
session.
C
B
E
And
another
question,
so
this
also
means
that
it's
the
responsibility
of
a
community
steward
to
make
sure
that
every
new
member
and
also
subject
matter
experts,
whatever
is
up
to
date
with
mission
vision
and
how
everything
works.
And
this
is
not.
The
responsibility
of
a
working
group-
lead,
for
example,
yeah.
Exactly
okay,
good.
B
Okay,
cool,
if
there's
no
other
clarifying
questions
feel
free
to
interrupt
if
there
are,
but
if
there's
no
others,
then
let's
go
into
the
next
proposal,
which
is
the
decision
making
process,
I'm
actually
forking
it
to
so
I'll
share
my
screen
to
include
some
comments
that
were
made
by
grace
and
myself
to
can
is
my
share
screen
working
this
time
great.
So
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
fork
here.
B
First
off
grace
made
a
really
great
comment
around
including
problems
or
opportunities,
and
so
I
want
to
just
kind
of
add
that
into
the
proposal
that
every
proposal
needs
to
have
a
clear
problem
statement
and
specific
outcomes
that
need
to
be
resolved.
I
thought
that
was
a.
I
don't
know.
I
would
like
to
propose
that
we
add
that
into
the
decision-making
process
just
as
a
standard
and
the
other
big.
The
other
change
is
just
a
kind
of
more
of
a
bureaucratic
change
of
moving
the
time
from
friday.
B
B
B
So
I'm
formally
proposing
a
near-term
mission
explainer,
which
basically
says
that
the
near-term
mission
is
to
launch
the
you
know:
smart
contract
system
and
the
culture
around
the
smart
contract
system
that
has
a
bonding
curve
and
conviction
voting
and
that
we
call
this
the
te
commons
and
that's
that's.
The
mission
for
the
next
six
months
is
just
to
get
through
this
roadmap
and
actually
launch
watch
the
thing.
E
So
that's
that's
cool
because
I
really
felt
there
was
a
lot
of
misunderstanding
here
and
to
me
it
feels
now:
okay,
maybe
to
just
to
double
check.
So
that
means
I
I
I
tried
to
take
a
very
simple
term
for
the
te
commons.
So
at
the
moment
we
are
planning
for
a
funding
machine
in
a
way,
but
of
course,
in
the
future,
this
could
be
anything
and
integrate
all
kinds
of
knowledge
and
tools
being
integrated
in
as
commons
and
a
common
good.
B
Yeah
exactly
it's
just
that's,
you
know
what
the
dow
becomes
is.
Is
it's
too
early
to
see
for
sure,
but
you
know
eventually
it
could
be.
It
could
just
take
over
and
become
like
you
know,
the
main
organization
for
engineering,
all
engineering
that
exists
in
the
world.
You
know
who
knows
it
could
it
could
be
good
yeah,
it
could
get
huge,
but
for
now
just
trying
to
fund
public
goods.
B
B
I
I
think
working
group
zero
might
just
need
to
be
worked
on
when
chemnam
gets
here.
So
hopefully
she
gets
here
after
I'm
done
with
this,
but
praise
quantification
has
begun,
even
though
it
hasn't
fully
been
shown
like
finished.
I
want
to
give
like
a
five
minute
overview
of
how
we've
quantified
praise.
So
far,
this
is
this
praise.
Quantification
proposal
was
shown
off
last
week
and
it
had
a
lot
of
comments
on
it.
Thank
you
angela
and
chemnum
and
jeff.
B
I
think
also
put
some
comments
here
and
basically
the
idea
is
things
that
changed.
Is
that
we're
gonna
instead
of
calling
it
cred,
which
we
already
have
te
cred
and
it
was
kind
of
confusing
we're,
gonna
call
the
the
currency
that
or
the
spreadsheet
currency
that's
created
as
a
tec
impact
hours
and
just
as
a
summary,
this
tec
impact
hours
are
only
relevant
up
until
the
hatch
is
successful
and
after
that,
there's
they're
kind
of
lose
their
relevancy,
because
they're
funded
te
commons
impact
hours
are
actually
funded
by
the
hatch.
B
So
after
the
hatch.
Well,
then
it's
kind
of
not
relevant
anymore,
and
the
idea
is
that
we
will.
Everyone
is
encouraged
to
dish,
praise
or
make
people
aware
of
whatever
work
is
being
done
in
the
te
common
space
and
there's
kind
of
three
tiers
of
work
that
is
going
to
be
quantified
most.
The
most
important
tier
is
the
tier
one,
which
is
complete.
Unpaid
volunteer
work
to
to
make
this
thing
a
reality.
B
Then
there's
also
mostly
volunteer
work
that
is
kind
of
passively
supporting
the
te
commons
creation,
which
is
tier
two
and
then
there's
paid
work
for
the
te
commons
and
also
supporting
work
on
the
t
academy
to
ebook
t
review
committee
and
really
anything
that
is
helping.
The
te
community
is
indirectly
helping
the
te
commons.
So
we
want
to
encourage
a
culture
of
dishing
praise
to
any
work.
B
That's
done
in
the
te
community,
then
there's
also
work
that
is
not
relevant
for
praise
in
receiving
impact
hours,
which
is
like
defy
work
or
you
know.
That's
like
just
for-profit
defy
work.
That's
you
know,
launching
a
new
token
farming
technique
or
doing
paid
token
engineering
work
on
the
side
somewhere.
B
So
you
know
we
took
all
the
praise
that
was
relevant
to
token
engineering
commons
and
in
this
sheet
you
can
see
in
column
a
you.
Have
the
people
who
receive
praise
column
b.
The
people
who
dish
praise
column
c
is
the
the
people.
The
the
comment
for
the
praise
and
column
e
is
the
the
date.
Column.
F
is
the
room
that
the
praise
was
dished
in
from
here
on
out.
It
will
probably
just
be
the
token
engineering
commons
room
on
telegram,
but
historically
we
didn't
always
have
that
room.
B
So
we
included
a
few
other
rooms
where
praise
is
being
dished,
and
then
we
have
some
points
so
in
column,
h
and
column.
I
well
so
in
column
g,
we
just
kind
of
guess
to
communicate
to
everyone
what
tier
we
thought
this
work
was
done
in
and
then
in
column,
h
and
column.
I
olivia
and
I
will
go
through
and
actually
give
a
score
just
points.
B
These
points
end
up
getting
averaged
out
and
show
what
percentage
of
the
total
work
that
was
done.
You
know
the
the
score
gets
and
then
we
do
some
magic
math
and
it
turns
turns
into
cred
per
praise.
So
this
praise
for
putting
on
the
token
engineering
academy,
the
first
round
of
tokyo
academy
that
angela
and
chevnam
did
they
ended
up
both
earning
four
point.
B
It's
it's
a
little
rough,
because
this
is
historic
for
the
last
two
months,
but
it's
it's
something
and
and
then
we
actually
aggregate
the
results
here,
and
this
is
the
results
for
this
round
and
we're
pretty
happy.
I'm
pretty
happy,
at
least
with
the
results
I
can
show
them.
Here
too,
the
chevnam
was
the
top
scorer
with
43
impact
hours
and
angela
got
36.
B
B
We
have
like
a
first
example
of
how
the
token
could
be
created
so
like
every
we
will
add
up
all
of
the
hours
that
were
ever
put
into
these
price
sheets
and
we'll
add
them
all
up
and
then
put
that
number
here
and
then
we'll
have
some
sort
of
algorithm
that
reward
by
per
impact
hour.
How
much
money
is
raised
in
the
hatch
the
more
money
raised
in
the
hatch,
the
smaller
the
percentage
is
that
the
the
hatch
contributors
have
to
pay
right,
but
also
the
higher
the
impact
hour
is
worth.
B
B
Yeah,
so
this
cred
per
person
is
a
distributed
sum
of
sorry,
I
I
just
I
realized
it
was
filtered
and
there's
kind
of
this
praise
count
so
to
get
the
praise
results.
I
just
filter
here
so
that
I
just
grab
one
of
each
name,
but
basically
this
cred
per
person
impact
hours
per
person.
This
is
the
total
amount
of
impact
hours
that
they
earned.
That
round
got.
B
It's
it's
like
token
engineering,
commons
impact
hours,
it's
it's
just
to
kind
of
define
that
this
is
kind
of
like
a
measurement
of
at
least
one
olivia,
and
I
are
are
putting
these
numbers
down
kind
of
doing
like
impact
per
time
like
if
you
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
something
it
didn't
have.
A
lot
of
impact
will
still
probably
give
you
some.
B
Okay,
well
cool!
If
there's
no
questions
on
this
feel
free
to
review
it,
and
the
main
next
steps
are
that
we're
going
to
publish
a
blog
post
kind
of
showing
off
what
everybody
earned.
And
hopefully
our
hope
here
is
that
this
will
show
people
that
it's
not
just
by
putting
you
earn
tokens
in
the
eventual
launch
of
the
dow
that
we're
creating.
So
hopefully,
this
will
help
us
attract
and
onboard
people
so
that
they
know
that
they
will
be
rewarded
for
their
work.
B
I
I
Be
cool
to
get
it
there
because
I'm
sure
that
a
lot
of
people
you
know
yes
it
it
will
definitely
and
it
will
fulfill
its
purpose.
It
will
definitely
show
okay,
something
is
happening
there
and
if
you
join
and
contribute-
and
you
have
the
right
background-
you
know
don't
wait.
I
I
think
that's
great.
At
the
same
time,
you
know
we're
doing
all
of
this
token
engineering
reviews
and
what
have
you
I'm
sure
people
are
going
to
pick
it
apart.
So.
B
B
Okay,
that's
that's
cool
I'll,
add
that
to
the
proposal
and
then
actually
we're
running
a
little
behind
on
schedule,
but
you
had
a
proposed
name.
You
had
a
proposal
about
well,
not
a
formal
proposal,
but
something
about
working
group
zero.
Did
you
just
want
to
present
that
idea
before
we
move
on
to
the
data
gathering
section.
I
B
Yeah
great
okay,
then,
let's
move
on
to
the
gathering
data
online
onboarding
data
gathering,
so
it'd
be
really
really
great
if
everyone
could
actually
open
the
call
notes,
because
we
have
some
engagement
opportunity,
because
this
is
kind
of
the
this
is
the
pattern
of
the
calls
is
that
first
half
we
show
off
work
that
has
been
done.
Second,
half,
let's
all
hang
out
and
start
throwing
data
out.
B
B
What
is
the
best
way
to
approach
them?
So
if
you
could
just
spend
you
know,
maybe
we'll
make
it
because
we're
short
on
time
three
minutes
to
write
down
the
person
that
you
want
to
onboard
to
this
to
this
project
and
how
you
think
the
best
way
would
be
to
approach
them,
and
the
purpose
here
is
to
gather
this
data
and
then
actually
design
methodology
for
onboarding
and
improve
the
onboarding
proposal.
Is
that
right,
olivia.
B
B
C
C
C
A
B
B
Yeah,
I
guess
working,
the
idea
is
that
working
group
leads
will
be
community
stewards
and
one
of
the
things
about
leads
is
that
leads.
Don't
have
to
do
all
of
the
work
leads
just
have
to
make
sure
the
work
gets
done.
So
let's
say
we
have
a
working
group
around
building
the
techno
technical
specification
for
the
conviction,
voting
gap
right,
a
piece
of
the
pie.
Well,
that
person
just
needs
to
make
sure
that
the
that
we
have
a
final
product
that
is
good.
They
don't
have
to
write
it.
They
don't
have
to
design
it.
B
They
just
have
to
make
sure
it
happens,
and
then
they
can
go
to
subject
matter.
Experts
collect
the
right
subject
matter
experts
into
the
group
and
also
make
sure
that
the
results
like
this
is
why
working
group
leads
we're
proposing
that
they're
community
stewards
is
that
the
community
stewards
have
a
really
good
overview
of
the
entire
project,
or
at
least
that's
the
that's
the
dream,
and
so
they
can
make
sure
that
whatever
products,
whatever
the
working
group
produces,
is
also
aligned
with
all
the
other
pieces
of
the
puzzle.
C
C
I
B
B
B
B
B
Yeah
anyway,
there's
a
signaling
vote
and
then
onboarding
recruitment
strategy.
I
think
we're
out
of
time.
So,
let's
just
let's,
I
feel
free
to
finish
voting
on
this
and
then
actions
for
the
week.
So
what
proposals
or
action
items
do
we
need
to
get
done
this
week?
So
obviously
we
need
to
propose
a
bunch
of
votes.
B
I
H
H
B
C
B
We
don't
lose
them
other
than
that,
then,
if
feel
free
to
come
through
and
add
things
to
this
after
the
call.
But
let's
just
do
a.
We
have
three
minutes
to
run
through
last
closing
remarks.
So
let's
do
it!
Thank
you
guys
for
coming.
I
think
it
was
a
good
call.
I
like
the
action
steps.
I
really
like
the
progress
that
we
made.
C
I
So
definitely
you
guys
are
super
good
in
incorporating
feedback
and
reacting
fast.
So
we're
learning
as
well
and
and
definitely
people
take
you
know,
take
the
initiative
take
ownership.
This
is
a
great
community.
You
know
it
I'm
looking
at
mikhail
cool,
that's
his
area
as
well.
So
then
I
pass
it
on
to
mikhail.
Basically.
D
I
think
I'm
on
I'm
still,
you
know,
like
figuring
out
as
you
see,
so
thanks
a
lot
for
the
update.
I
see
that
I
have
actually
more
work
to
do
catching
up
with
things
you
know
like
with
the
proposals
voting,
but
you
know
like
really
good
work,
really
good
progress
and
really
important
that
you
try
to
keep
the
momentum
going
so
kudos
for
that
and
maybe
I'll
pass
it
to
angela.
E
Yeah,
I'm
super
excited
for
the
moment
when
this
is
becoming
a
more
public
initiative
by
launching
the
bitcoin
grant
and
by
also
publishing
medium
articles,
because
I
guess
this
will
be
and
and
also
I
I
felt
that
the
survey
raised
attention.
So
it
will
be
exciting
to
see
more
and
more
people
coming
in
and
contributing
can't
wait
pass
it
on
to
jeff.
G
Yeah
really
happy
to
to
see
the
progress
being
made.
I
know
it's
a
it's
a
long
game
and
we've
all
been
working
on
various
pieces
of
the
puzzle
for
for
quite
a
while.
But
it's
amazing
to
see
this
initiative
coming
together,
and
I
think
this
is
you
know
the
the
pathway
to
higher
leverage
for
everything
that
we're
working
on
and
I'm
really
excited
to
to
start
taking
this
out
into
the
wider
community.
G
And
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
have
been
hearing
the
message
of
token
engineering
over
the
past
years
and
really
excited
to
to
start
spreading,
that
the
tools
and
the
processes
and
the
the
cultural
build
processes
that
that
may
help
other
groups
who
are
looking
to
do
the
same
thing.
And
I
will
pass
suggest
because
nobody
can
see
her
because
she's
sitting
right
beside
me.