►
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tamara
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Yes,
damn
temperature
check
right
now
is,
like
still
still
warm,
even
though,
like
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
happening,
I
feel
that
one
of
the
challenges
that
we've
been
having
this
week
is
just
catching
up
in
a
more
coordinated
way
to
everything.
That's
happening.
That's
like
the
first
time
that
teams
go
through
this
like
more
as
like
everyone,
as
contributors
like
collectively.
B
So
I
feel,
is
one
of
the
challenges,
but
at
the
same
time
I
I'm
excited
about
the
changes
and
just
the
awareness
that
it's
bringing
so
so
yeah,
I,
I
would
say
warm,
but
even
readier,
for
just
for,
for
catching
up
and
and
and
being
able
to
do
a
better
job.
Coordinating
around
comes
I'll
pass
it
to
huanka.
C
This
this
process
of
the
working
groups
being
trying
to
become
doubts
and
all
that
what
that
means,
but
it's
super
interesting,
also
learning
as
much
as
I
can
and
yeah.
Personally,
I
have
been
feeling
a
little
bit
with
a
cold,
but
that's
the
only
distraction
really
that
I
have
been
feeling
this
this
weeks
and
I'll
pass
to
libby.
D
D
What
are
the
data
sources?
We
have
the
ones
we
don't
have.
How
can
we
get
it
and
it
feels
like
there's
something
coming
full
circle
and
I'm
excited
about
that
and
yeah
always
great
to
see
a
lot
of
new
people
in
the
in
the
orientation
call
and
also
reward
systems
feel
like
it's
flowing
like
it
should
now
and
there's,
of
course,
many
things
to
fix
still,
but
there's
a
a
pace.
Moving
forward
and.
E
E
Yeah
I'm
just
checking
in
I
guess
I
haven't
been
on
the
stewards
call
in
a
little
while
I'm
kind
of
trying
to
wrap
up
some
of
the
things
that
I've
taken
on
and
kind
of,
assess
like
where
I
want
to
go
so
yeah
thanks
I'll
pass
to.
I
don't
know
who
all's
gone.
I
got
on
a
little
later
past.
F
Lauren,
okay,
sorry,
the
mute
managing
yeah
temperature
check,
I'm
feeling
good
and
and
warm-
and
you
know
I
felt
like
I
just
want
to
say
I.
I
voted
in
this
like
how
to
use
the
how
to
use
the
git
queen
grants
money
and
there
was
like
it
was
like
neck
and
neck
two
options
and
they
were
my
top
two
choices.
But
then,
when
I
voted
the
other
third
option
that
I
put
third
went
to
top
and
I
was
like
wait:
oh
no,
I
broke
it
anyway.
F
Is
really
cool
and
ranked
choice?
Voting
is
really
cool
and
how
it
like
it's
like
it's
like
totally,
not
gameable
so
yeah,
but
I'm
feeling
good
about
that.
I'm
also
really
excited
about
the
give
tc
liquidity
that
mitch
has
been
working
on.
I
think
the
proposal
just
passed
in
the
gift
garden
recently
really
recently,
so
I'm
feeling
good
and
really
warm
about
that,
and
there
was
a
tweet
from
the
tc
yesterday
about
like
taking
care
of
yourself
with
this
cat.
F
H
No,
she
passed
it
to
me.
I'm
done
I'm
sorry.
Okay,
see,
we
have
been.
We
were
mute,
games,
mute
games
because
she's
right
here
but
yeah.
I
I
want
to
give
huge
praise
to
mitch
for
like
6xing
our
liquidity
almost
single-handedly
with
this
token
swap
with
give
super
huge-
and
it's
really
awesome
to
see-
and
so
I'm
really
excited
about
that,
and
now
we
have
a
a
decent
market
on
honey
swap.
H
So
if
people
want
to
buy
without
using
the
the
without
using
the
bonding
curve,
they
actually
can
for
the
first
time
ever
starting
today,
I
think
give
got
its
token
swap
up,
so
that
was
45
000
worth
of
liquidity
and
when
t
sees
when
the
laser
tag,
multi
makes
those
final
things
then
we'll
have
another
45.
H
So
then
we'll
have
over
100k
worth
of
liquidity,
which
is
something
you
can
actually
like
use
and
hopefully
we'll
have
more
with
the
water
proposal
and
all
these
things
so
liquidity
swaps,
laser
tag
is
on
fire
and
I
also
really
love
the
like
tight
race
on
the
get
coin
on
the
what
to
do
with
bitcoin
funds.
So
that's
super
cool
and
and
just
in
general
the
tc
has
really
grown
it
lately,
I'll
pass
it
to
ygg.
A
J
I
I
Proposal
inverter
really
exciting,
just
got
off
a
call
with
mert
and
mitch,
and
the
proposal
is
ready
to
go
so
we're
excited
to
have
a
kind
of
final
discussion
a
little
for
a
few
minutes
in
this
call
later,
to
get
some
feedback
and
communication
on
that
and
we're
ready
to
deploy
the
proposal
for
conviction
voting
so
it'll
be
up
this
week.
I
imagine
and
yeah
that's
so
the
lab
was
canceled.
Last
week
I
was
sick
and
five
iv
was
there
was
a
holiday
which
was
good.
I
He
was
celebrating,
but
back
on
this
friday
and
yeah.
So
just
getting
back
to
this
sort
of
things
and
I'll
pass
it
over
to
gene.
K
K
A
We're
just
doing
a
temperature
check
if
you
want
to
share
anything
about.
I
don't
know
what's
going
on
in
the
community
or
for
yourself
personally.
K
I've
been
going
through
quite
a
bit
to
be
honest,
but
yeah,
I'm
taking
it
one
day
at
a
time
yeah
and
yeah
yeah.
It's
I'm
blessed
to
be
a
part
of
this
community.
So
thank
you
guys.
M
Yeah
sure,
sorry,
I
got
some
crazy
background
distractions
today,
feeling
really
good,
though
the
reward
system
is
coming
along.
The
quantifications
are
actually
mostly
getting
done
on
time,
which
is
great,
considering
we
really
up
the
ante
with
the
amount
of
stuff
that
needs
to
get
done.
Proposal
inverter
is
hot.
M
A
Cool
and
past
too
neat.
N
Yeah
temperature
is
hot.
I
really
enjoy
seeing
all
the
different
initiatives
and
the
information
flow
between
working
groups
really
improving
in
the
past
couple
weeks,
which
is
really
awesome
to
see.
I
think
we're
having
the
right
conversations
in
the
working
groups,
and
it's
just
really
it's
really
nice
to
to
see
everybody
kind
of
digging
into
their
own
functions
and
and
and
directions,
and
so
yeah.
It's
amazing
and
just
want
to
say,
jean's
back.
That's
awesome,
hey!
N
What's
up
man
good
to
see
you
again
and
yeah,
it's
it's
been
great
and
I
think
we're
we're
we're.
Looking
pretty
good
and
I'll
pass
it
over
to.
Let's
see,
let's
see
if
I
can
zepty.
O
I
was
even
talking
with
juan
today,
because
yeah
like
there
is
extra
like
even
in
transparency
too,
like
there
is
extra
fans
like
we're,
using
like
we're
using
less
funds
that
we're
always
saying
we
were
using
for
and
then
we
had
this
idea
of
buying
tc
with
this
extra
funds
so
yeah
it
can
support
the
dc
somehow
and
then
yeah
having
all
this
liquidity
in
honey
swap,
it
makes
very
difficult
to
buy
it
from
the
from
the
honey
stop.
I
guess
like
it's
not
aligned,
but
yeah.
It's
really
different.
O
It's
awesome
to
have
this
liquidity
yeah
I'll,
pass
it
to.
P
P
Okay,
that's
cool,
I
was
gonna,
say
good
testament
to
the
ethics
of
our
community.
But
it's
quite
sad
if
you
can
censor
that
so
people
voted
for
that
anyway,
it's
good,
I'm
just
finding
a
balance
on
on
contributing
and
helping
all
the
different
working
groups
that
I'm
helping
out
and
other
than
that
yeah.
It's
pretty
warm!
I'm
almost
finished
with
the
praise.
Quad
midge
I'll
be
done
by
the
time
you
you
you
say
machakka,
so
yeah
we're
good
and
I
will
pass
it
to
it
wasn't
gone
yet.
A
P
Q
Mr
jack,
I
had
time
for
myself
just
today,
so
that
is
highly
appreciated
and
I
think
yeah
that's
highly
appreciated.
I
feel
also
that
you
know
becoming
more
efficient
with
the
onboarding
process
and
delegating
more
in
other
members
of
communities
has
been
really
helpful
on
that
side.
In
that
sense,
gideon's
stepping
up
and
sort
of
you
know
tweaking
our
manifesto
and
all
this
stuff
seems
like
you
know,
people
owning
also
their
time
here.
I
feel
it's,
it's
really
nice.
Q
So
on
that
sense,
good,
I
love
seeing
the
people
from
gnosis
joining
the
call
today
to
ask
about
praise.
You
know:
that's
that's
interesting
by
itself,
even
even
if
it
doesn't
get
implemented.
It's
just
interesting
that
you
know
it's.
I
feel
it's
one
of
these
products
that
we
don't
push
to.
We
don't
push
enough
people
to
know
about,
and
I
will
pass
it
on
to
mert.
Of
course,.
R
Thank
you,
edward,
so,
temperature
check
as
mitch
and
shaun
mentioned,
there's
been
a
very
hot
development
going
on
in
a
proposed
inverter
side.
We've
tried
to
solve
this
little
administrative
issues.
Then
we're
good
to
go
like
the
team
is
building
very
excited
about
it
and
also
yeah.
This
week
I've
been
actually
kind
of
very
stressed
due
to
panic,
attack
things,
but
everything
is
good
for
now,
so
I'm
ready
to
work
with
like
full
speed.
Now
again,
so
I'm
good
on
that
that
side.
R
So
that's
my
temperature
and
I
think
we
why
I
think,
oh,
why?
Why
did
you
talk.
G
No
I'm
left
yeah,
so
temperature
is
warm
and
I'm
really
excited
about
the
price
quantifications
like
I
really
enjoy
quantifying
gold
price.
So
that's
been
fun.
G
We
were
actually
planning
on
doing
one
this
week,
but
then
there
were
some
changes
that
came
up,
so
we
won't
be
doing
it,
but
yeah.
I'm
really
excited
about
that
and
kind
of
that.
I
wasn't
able
to
take
the
last
bottom
session
on
tc
labs,
so
I'm
like
planning
on
maybe
try
trying
to
do
more,
like
working
hours
kind
of
sessions
just
to
ensure
that
now
we
don't
miss
out
on
any
of
the
content
of
the
course
and
that's
pretty
much
it
who
hasn't
gone.
I
think
everyone's
gone.
A
Well,
wonka
one
kawaii,
okay,
it's
just
so
long
ago.
Now
this
this
check-in
lasts
20
minutes
staff.
Welcome
to
the
stewards
weekly
call,
as
you
can
see
at
the
agenda.
The
first
point
that
we
do
every
week
is
just
a
temperature
check.
If
you
want
to
share
something
about
yourself
personally,
the
community,
any
of
the
working
groups
that
you're
participating
in
everyone
gets
about
a
minute
to
share.
Is
there
anything
you'd
like
to
share
steph.
L
And
the
weather
is
great,
I'm
contributing
to
omega
and
I'm
just
eavesdropping
into
this
one.
So
I'm
here
to
listen
to
what's
happening.
A
Yeah,
cool
and
you're
very
you're
very,
very
welcome
to
hang
out
so
then
I
guess
I'm
the
last
to
go,
and
I
would
say
I
took
monday
and
tuesday's
personal
days
and
I
had
meant
to
get
a
bunch
of
personal
stuff
done,
but
I
think
I
came
to
the
realization
that
we're
not
a
dog
family,
so
I
think
I
have
to
get
rid
of
our
puppy
and
it
was
like
very
traumatic
for
all
of
us,
so
I
went
through,
like
I
guess,
the
tough
emotional
period
those
last
four
days,
but
this
morning
I
woke
up
feeling
more
at
a
better
place
with
the
with
where
we
are
with
that
and
didn't
make
it
to
the
praise.
S
A
I
keep
looking
forward
to
a
week
for
for
doing
praise
and
you
know
I'm
not
getting
picked
because
it
is
is
fun
to
go
through
them,
as
vi
said,
and
the
last
thing
I
couldn't
be
more
delighted
that
gina
is
on
our
calls
today.
It's
really
good
to
see
you
again,
so
I
left
it
on
from
last
week,
mount
mono
is
going
to
be
the
students
working
group
coordination
lead,
and
I
couldn't
be
happier
so
thanks
manu
for
taking
this
on,
and
then
I
want
to
bring
up
a
calendar
changes.
A
Calendar
changes
that
came
up
so
lauren
was
hoping
to
find
another
time
for
the
stewards,
because
she
has
a
conflicting
call
with
comms
and
giveth,
and
it
seemed
like
a
good
idea
to
to
change
things.
Up
too,
I
propose
either
with
comms
tec
comms
or
with
the
soft
gov
that
we
could
change
the
stewards
call
so
tuesday,
6
pm.
A
A
M
F
So
it's
we
don't
change
yeah,
we
don't
change,
and
this
is
like
the
last
change
like
europe
is
changing
and
then
that's
the
end,
so
they'll
be
like
permanently
conflicting.
M
For
you,
my
mitch,
usually
I'm
out
volunteering
during
that
time
on
tuesdays,
so
that
would
be.
My
conflict
is
like
rushing
to
be
here
on
time.
For
this
call
it's
a
personal
thing,
but
yeah.
A
A
With
softgov,
so
basically
stewards
and
oh
somebody
moved
around
the
calendar
already,
you
guys
are
fast,
it
would
be
stewards
and
soft
gov.
Switching
so
soft
would
happen
on
wednesdays
and
stewards
would
happen
on
tuesdays,
both
at
seven
pm.
A
Lauren
asked
because
she
has
a
conflict
that
happens
because
of
the
time
change
the
time
difference
so
the
time
zone
that
therein
doesn't
change
and
europe
changes.
So
the
basically
ends
up
placing
some
meetings
on
top
of
each
other.
A
A
A
Just
until
we're
back
okay,
well,
let's
move
on
I'll
do
that
in
a
minute.
Okay,
so
we'll
figure
out
about
soft
glove
and
stewards.
The
orientation
party
is
going
to
start
happening
on
thursday
at
7
00
pm
right
before
the
community
call,
and
it
starts
happening
next
week.
So
just
I
guess
we
could
maybe
even
promote
that
a
little
bit,
because
I
think
people
are
used
to
thursday
at
seven.
I
mean
wednesday
at
six
pm.
Q
A
A
When
does
this
end,
it
ends
in
15
minutes
cool
okay
check
in
on
the
spotlight
for
the
community
call.
C
Damn
there's
something
I
wanted
to
say
on
this
and
it's
something
that
happened
to
me.
So
maybe
it's
just
to
share
that.
If
you
vote
with
all
of
your
tokens
in
one
of
the
proposals,
you
may
not
be
able
to
to
vote
on
the
boats
on
the
decision.
Boats
like
update
fees,
so
it's
good
to
leave
like
just
one
in
order
to
be
able
to
vote
to
win
these
decisions.
C
C
It
said
that
the
decision
was
with
a
snapshot
and
that
in
that
snapshot
I
didn't
have
tokens
because
they,
I
think
they
were
in
a
pro
in
a
proposal
supporting
a
proposal.
H
Q
Sorry
things
are
up.
You
mean
that
you
couldn't
vote
because
you
had
your
votes,
your
tokens
take
in
gardens.
Q
Yes,
it
happened
to
me
the
same
stuff.
I
couldn't
vote.
I
couldn't
vote
when
I
had
all
my
tokens
in
gardens.
H
If
either
of
you
have
screenshots
of
this
in
any
way
or
you
can
make
it
happen
again,
that
would
be
really
beneficial
and
then
I'm
sure,
because
that's
a
really
critical
failure
of
the
application,
because
you
should
be
able
to
vote
with
decision
votes
and
there's
no
tech
on
the
smart
contract
side.
There's
no
reason
why
that
would
happen.
A
I
mean
I
also
had
that
strange.
I
think
we
decided
it
was
also
a
bug
that
I
wasn't
able
to
rank
choice
less
than
the
full
amount
of
choices
that
I
could
only
submit
a
vote
after
I
selected
all
of
the
choices
in
order
in
some
order.
I
couldn't
select
just
one
or
two
I
didn't
like.
I
wasn't
able
to
push
the
vote
button.
It
was
grayed
out
and
once
I
ranked
all
of
the
choices,
then
I
was
able
to
press
the
vote
button,
which
is
also
not
behavior,
that
I
expected.
H
People,
but
they
can,
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
that
they
have
too
many
people
using
ring
choice
voting.
So
I'm
not
surprised
to
see
her
bugs.
But
again,
if
you
guys
run
into
any
of
these
technical
issues,
send
me
send
me
the
screenshots.
Send
me
the
send
me
some
text
and
I'll
rally
it
to
the
right
person.
When
I
make
an
issue
on
github
it,
it
gets
more
attention
than
others.
So
it's
worth
it
just
going
through
me,
then
we
get
what
we
want.
N
I
also
wanted
to
add
something
about
the
gardens
is.
Is
there
any
way
we
can
create
space
for,
say
a
proposal?
That's
been
up
for
a
certain
amount
of
time
to
to
show
to
allow
people
to
talk
about
either
dissent
or
critiques,
or
something
to
improve
that
proposal
just
to
kind
of
give
space.
For
that
I
don't
know,
I
think
just
the
forum.
H
M
N
I
see
so
that's
all
linked
to
the
forum.
I
was
wondering
how
people
were
coming.
I
was
like
okay.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
spotlight
for
the
community
call
for
tomorrow.
A
Q
Yeah-
I
was
thinking
about
that
and
we
talked
about
that
just
today
in
sorry,
maybe
for
yesterday
on
the
call
and
yeah
he
still
needs
to
update
a
little
bit
the
proposal,
I
believe,
but
we
can
still
reach
him
out
to
ask
him
if
he
he
seemed
he
seemed
he
agreed
to
present
that
on
community.
Q
N
I
think
that
we'll
probably
run
into
a
lot
more
often
is
this
duplication
of
efforts
within
the
te
community
around
similar
initiatives,
and
I'm
wondering
how
we
can
improve
that
type
of
thing
to
where
we're
actually
not
funding
separate
but
similar
initiatives
and
and
and
promoting
collaboration
between
these
types
of
things,
rather
than
maintaining
this
like
competitive
environment.
For
for
these
types
of
projects
that
are
trying
to
accomplish
the
same
same
end,
goal.
N
Yeah
right,
I
would
just
say
that
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
different
initiatives.
I've
seen
that
are
trying
to
do
the
same
thing
within
the
te
space
and
if
we
fund
one,
I
think
there
would
be
an
argument
for
other
people
to
justify
funding
another
and
another
and
another,
and
so
like.
I
think
this
this
issue
it
might
become
something
later
on.
K
Can
carry
his
hand
and
just
inquire
real
quickly,
because
I'm
failing
to
find
what
the
current
fee
structure
is.
I'm
just
wondering
because
I
want
to
at
least
be
aware
of
the
current
parameters
before
I
try.
I
I'm
sorry
I
hadn't
voted
on
this
one
before
I
just
want
to
throw
a
vote
in,
but
I'm
not
sure
says
actions
will
be
update
fees
deducted
from
buy
and
sell
orders
respectively,
16
and
5,
but
that
is
two
but
from
what
is
okay.
I
apologize
that
I
haven't
found
the
actual
proposal.
H
H
A
Thanks
for
bringing
that
up,
it's
this
one
goldilocks
proposed
tribute
adjustments
in
the
forum
and
yeah.
It's
a
bummer
that
it's
not
in
here
that
we
can't
we
can't
link
to
it.
Can
can
we
link
to
it
in
the
description
area.
M
H
Yeah
you
you
can
but
like
mitch
said
no
really
mitch
can
mitch
could,
and
I
could
talk
to
mitch
to
figure
out
how
to
do
it.
Maybe
maybe
ygg
could,
but
I
I
bet
that's
about
it.
Maybe
you're
pretty
savvy
with
these
things,
but
not
not.
It
takes
next
level
kind
of
technical
abilities
to
do
that.
H
A
D
Yeah,
that's
also
new
to
me.
So
in
all
of
the
descriptions
I
wrote
that
we
should
link
the
forum
post
in
there,
so
the
so.
What
we
should
do
is
just
have
the
forum
post
and
then
there's
no
way
to
put
a
link,
even
in
a
comment
or
anywhere
in
that
page,
like
people
would
just
have
that
small.
This
description.
H
K
G
What
are
you
referring
to?
Maybe
you
can
try
to
look
confined.
H
Oh
no,
it's
totally.
I
was
just
making
a
joke
totally
just
a
joke,
it's
cool,
but
we're
talking
about
how
in
doubt
voting
proposals.
You
can't
make
a
link
work
without
being
very
technically
savvy.
A
Okay,
cool
so
awesome,
I
guess
we'll
go
back
to
then
wesley
in
the
proof
of
competence
and
who
is
going
to
reach
out
to
wesley
about
the
spotlight
for
the
community
call.
A
Do
are
you
already
in
conversation
with
him
since
we're
talking
with
him
about
starting
this
in
communitas
as
well?
Yes,.
A
Cool
awesome
rewards
progress
want
to
share
some
updates,
olivia
or.
M
Yeah
just
waiting
on
a
couple
people
that
in
this
call
manu
and
livy,
and
then
I
think
it's
pretty
like
done
enough.
I
would
say.
A
Okay,
cool
and
do
we
have
any
date
for
when
we're
expecting
distributions
for
the
backlog
of
praise?
I
know
we
were
waiting
last
week
for
some
parameter.
Finalizations.
D
Yeah,
I
think
we
still
have
to
have
finalize
some
of
those
decisions
that
we
didn't
finish
last
week
and
we'll
have
another
meeting
this
week
that
there
is
a
some
options
passing
around
and
christopher,
just
shared
yesterday,
that
we
won't
be
able
to
probably
won't
be
able
to
do
retroactive
distribution
for
source
cred,
and
it
seems
like
what
makes
more
sense
is
just
start
source
cred
fresh
from
like
now
on.
D
But
that
also
needs
to
be
a
little
fleshed
out.
Cool.
A
All
right,
then,
if
there's
nothing
else
on
rewards
proposal,
inverter.
R
R
How
does
this
product
will
further
develop
token
engineering
as
a
discipline,
so
shawn
can
also
give
some
opinion
on
that
so,
but
I
can
also
give
very
briefly
so:
we've
talked
about
its
open
source
mantra,
so
it's
an
open
source
project
that
everybody
can
fork
whatever
they
want.
So
it's
not
a
product
of
one's
specific
project
that
is
like
producing
profit
out
of
it.
So
and
also
we've
talked
about
how
what
will
be
the
quote-unquote,
the
profit
structure
and
actually
the
reality.
R
R
So
that's
one
thing
that
has
been
discussed.
Another
thing
is
that
so
maybe
proposal
inverter
will
benefit
token
engineering
commons
directly
through
buying
tokens
from
bonding
curve,
so
it
will
give
both
parties
mutual
benefits.
Saying
like
through
the
entry
tribute,
common
pool,
will
have
more
money
and
propose:
inverted
treasury
will
have
some
tc
tokens,
so
it
will
further
develop
use
it
for
for
further
development
and
also
it
will
give
liquidity
for
tc
token.
So
that's
the
one
thing
that
has
been.
R
R
Yeah
exactly
very
good
clarification,
so,
as
I
said,
it's
not
discussed
yet
so
there's
no
plan
for
revenue,
generation
etc,
but
we
talked
these
things
if,
if
there
is,
if
in
the
future,
if
there's
a
revenue
generation
discussion
there,
these
this
can
arrows
in
the
process.
I
just
wanted
to
say
so
so
so
sorry
for
my
confusion.
R
So
today
I
will
upload
on
night
the
proposed
inverter
proposal
that
has
been
refined
in
the
forum
and
I
would
like
people
to
like
get
engaged
with
it
and
whether,
if
you
guys
believe
this
will
increase
token
engineering
development
as
a
tool
also
like
in
just
one
last
question.
Sorry
sean
you
may
want
to
talk
just
one
last
thing
that
mentioned
in
the
call
atawa
saying
that
this
tool
by
itself,
the
idea
of
this
tool
is
to
fund
public
goods
through
the
call
of
duty
collaborative
way.
R
I
Yeah
really
good
thanks
for
that
mert
and
mitch,
and
I
really
just
want
to
summarize
so
I
see
that
there's
three
points.
So
how
does
this
project
benefit?
Token
engineering?
Public
goods
number
one,
it's
a
massive
open
source
project,
so
the
entire
workflow
process,
development
process,
front-end
design,
solidity,
design,
the
token
engineering,
the
modeling
and
simulation
and
the
coordination
between
all
the
workers.
It's
it's.
You
know
we
record
all
our
videos,
we
post
those
and
all
the
code
is
open
sources.
G
I
Open
source
project,
so
that's
how
it's
token,
entering
public
goods
number
two
like
merc,
said.
The
purpose
of
the
proposal
inverter
is
to
accelerate
the
funding
of
of
public
goods,
essentially
through
the
dow
to
dao
philosophy
that
prime
dow
is
trying
to
bring
to
life
and
number
three,
and
I-
and
I
want
to
reemphasize
that
there's
nothing
to
do
with
this.
I
So
it
can
be
a
completely
optional
contribution
back
to
the
team
when
people
are
using
the
proposal
inverter,
and
we
could
do
something
really
cool
with
that
like
having
a
proportion
of
that
mint
tec
tokens
on
the
bonding
curve,
I
think
that'd
be
really
cool
and
that
got
really
positive
reception
in
the
call
today.
So
just
wanted
to
summarize
those
three
points.
R
And
one
last
thing:
people
tell
talk
that.
Maybe
we
need
to
introduce
like
a
proposed
inverter
as
a
product
more
comprehensively
to
a
tc
community
before
people
has
been
discussed
through
forum,
so
people
will
have
more
comprehensive
understanding
of
the
product.
So
I'd
like
to
arrange
a
call,
like
proposed-
inverted
party
that
that
we
have
done
like
last
week,
similar
to
that
one,
the
ltf
team
will
show
their
cat
cat
modeling
and
explain
the
product.
R
Maybe
it
will
be
beneficial
for
our
community
to
think
and
decide
on
how
to
fund
it,
how
much
to
fund
it
etc.
A
Yeah,
that's
a
super,
that's
a
very
interesting
idea,
so
the
the
post
by
mitch
didn't
get
so
much
traction.
Just
nobody
really
replenish
us
really
replied
on
the
forum.
So
it's
good
that
we're
having
this
conversation
now
and
if
I
understand
the
the
next
steps
is
you're
posting
you'll
post.
A
Another
version
of
the
proposal
inverted
proposal,
the
one
that
I
assume
we
would
eventually
post
to
conviction,
voting
to
pass
by
the
tec
community
and
then
ask
to
have
like
a
proposal,
inverter
ama,
something
where
we
can
have
invite
everyone
from
the
tec
community.
To
hear
more
about
the
proposal.
Inverter
I
mean.
Usually
that
would
be
like
that's
what
the
spotlight
is
great
for,
but
this
is
not
a
five
minute.
A
This
is
not
a
five
minute
project,
so
I
think
I
I
support
the
idea
of
having
yeah
a
party
on
the
tec.
Do
you
have
ideas
for
timings?
Is
it
something
that
would
take
place
of
a
regular
weekly
or
something
else.
R
So
this
will
be
a
regular
meeting,
so
I
would
like
to
actually
ask
your
you
guys,
availability
as
well.
So
since
you
are
the
top
leaders
of
the
community,
I
think
your
opinions
matter.
So
I
I
don't.
I
don't
know
about
timing,
but
I
I'd
like
to.
I
will
try
to
coordinate
the
best
time
for
everybody
to
join.
So
let's
say
it's
open
for
now.
I
will
chat
with
you
guys
and
try
to
find
the
best
time.
H
H
The
only
question
is
how
what
percentage
of
the
total
amount
of
funds
that
we
have
right
now
should
go
to
it,
whether
it's
more
or
less
than
what's
currently
offered,
and
I
think
that's
where
the
debate
should
really
focus
on,
because
yeah,
I
think
everyone
is
like
this
is
clearly
a
great
te
project.
It's
just
the
amount.
H
So
anything
we
can
do
to
come
to
a
better
consensus
on
how
much
we
should
put
towards
it
is
probably
going
to
be
really
valuable.
N
Yeah,
I
think
a
part
of
that
is
because
a
lot
of
I
don't
know
the
other
participants
within
this
funding
initiative
and
their
views
on
it.
And
if
you
know,
if
we
say
oh,
we
only
want
to
contribute
five
or
ten
thousand
will
they
back
out,
because
that's
that's
a
non-starter
for
me
in
my
opinion,
but
yeah.
I
just
think
there
needs
to
be
more
information.
Q
Can
I
propose
to
have
an
open
q,
a
session
in
the
tc
that
we
invite
all
the
other
people
or
something
like
that?
So
we
can
have
you
know
a
bigger
conversation.
I.
A
Q
A
I
just
to
to
the
point
about
the
the
question
not
being
about
how
important
proposal
inverter
is,
but
what
is
the?
What
is
the
right
figure
that
the
tec
contributes?
A
I
remember
last
week,
griff
made
the
point
that
the
other
payers
have
much
larger
treasuries
than
the
tec
has
so
45k
compared
to
the
you
know,
850k
that
we
have
is
something
just
under
five
percent
of
what
we
actually
have,
so
the
difference
might
be
very
stark,
and
I
think
that
was
it
was
more
of
a
question
of
how
what
percentage
of
what's
in
our
commons
pool.
A
Does
the
tec
want
to
want
to
contribute
more
than
like
just
just
some,
some
figure
that
everyone
else
is
contributing,
but
looking
at
it
more
as
a
percentage
of
what
we
have
in
total
and
yeah.
So
I
think
you
know
pulling
a
number
out
of
out
of
the
blue.
Just
saying
45k
does
make
it
a
little
bit
it's
a
little
bit
out
of
context
versus
compared
to
some
other
payers,
with
much
larger
treasuries
to
pull
from
and
yeah
it'd
be
interesting
to
have
that
conversation
as
well,
but
yeah,
it's
it's
a.
I
think.
I
They
would,
I
think
it
would
be
really
fascinating
to
have
all
the
payers
together.
That's
not!
I
haven't
really
thought
of
that
until
just
now,
because
the
the
contributors
are
kind
of
pitching
this
to
all
of
the
different
potential
payers
and
honestly,
it's
become
a
little
bit
political
like
when
it's
due
to
the
transparency
I
mean
all
the
payers
can
see
what
all
the
other
payers
are,
paying
and
and
we're
kind
of
hearing
the
same
story
of
you
know.
I
Why
aren't
they
paying
more,
but
I
think
it
would
be
really
interesting
to
have
all
the
pairs
together
in
the
same
room
yeah
I
mean
so
I
I
that
might
be
something
different
from
the
ama
or
but
dooley
noted
that
that
would
be
a
good
conversation
to
have
so
I'm
not
promising
anything,
but
I'm
just
kind
of
acknowledging
out
loud
that
that
would
be
a
really
interesting
conversation.
A
I
think
I
think
it's
a
different
conversation,
because
I
think
each
of
the
each
of
the
groups
that
are
contributing
will
have
will
be
very
focused
on
their
own
ability
to
to
to
fund
this
project
and
on
the
other
people
and
the
other
projects
abilities.
A
O
Nothing
was
actually
talking
with
him
today.
He
was
interested
in
joining
and
he
was
actually
asking
like
if,
if
they're
going
to
be
like
any
organization
like
in
paris
or
any,
anyone
is
like
yeah
fear
not
by
themselves.
A
Okay,
upcoming
tec
presentations,
pat
has
a
day
of
april
1st
3
p.m.
Utc
and
wants
to
know
which
of
the
stewards
is
available
to
present.
On
april
1st.
I
I
I'd
like
to
do
a
presentation
at
some
point:
just
have
to
double
check
my
availability
on
that
day.
A
S
A
3Pm
is
pretty
early
for
you,
but
not
impossible.
Utc,
not
not
cet.
I
Who?
Okay
I'll
I'll
check
and
confirm.
S
D
D
So
when
we
think
about
services
that
the
tc
that
the
working
groups
of
the
tc
are
offering
the
cultural
build
is
not
one
of
them,
for
example,
and
just
having
that
clear
that
a
lot
of
the
design
approach
we
we
have
in
the
tc
was
from
this
partnership
with
the
communist
attack
and
that
this
is
the
design
pattern
of
the
common
stack
and
the
mission
of
the
tec
is
purely
advancing
the
field
of
token
engineering.
And
how
can
we
always
keep
that
in
mind
to
see
what
can
possibly
be
out
of
scope
of
that?
D
D
D
So
it's
not
working
on
something
specific,
but
more
in
the
broad
sense
of
this
tooling
that
can
be
used
tooling
and
practices
that
can
be
used
by
the
field
itself,
so
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
clarify
that
boundary
specifically
and
and
that
a
lot
of
the
cultural
build
practices
even
implementing
ostrom's
principles,
and
all
that
is
much
part
of
the
common
stack
design
and
admission
and
also
the
prey
system
is
a
common
stack
product
or
a
general
magic
product.
D
I
don't
know
we
have
to
put
the
underside
up
put
like
communicate
that
better,
but
but
praise
is
not
a
tc
product
so
also
that
clarification
that
if
something
comes
to
the
tc
like,
oh,
we
want
to
integrate
praise
in
our
community.
D
Q
Okay,
I
that's
an
interesting
there's,
an
interesting
point
of
view,
I'm
curious
to
know
the
cultural
practice.
Where
does
that
end,
and
when
does
that
start
and
what
are
the
consequences
of
not
acknowledging
that
just
to
have
clear
boundaries
as
not
only
where
it
starts,
but
also
where
it
ends?
For
me,
for
example,
cultural
practices?
Does
that
implies
also
the,
for
example,
the
onboarding
process?
Does
that
also
takes
in
consideration
the
bots
that
bye,
bye
b
creates
that
applies
in
the
cultural
build?
Q
Q
Do
you
like
what
would
be
like,
for
example,
someone
comes
here
and
implements
often
principles
just
by
seeing
the
tc
build
does
they
have
do
they
have
to
reach
out
to
common
stack
to
notify
that
like?
Is
there
any?
What
will
be
the
consequences
of
that
like?
Because
I
don't
I
don't
understand
very
well
this
sense
of
owning
these
practices
and
what
are
the
consequences
of
these
implementations
that
will
be
very
similar
to
the
ones
probably
done
by
the
common
stock.
D
Yeah,
so
I
it's
not,
I,
I
don't
think
it's
ownership
of
the
practices,
it's
just
what
is
in
scope
of
what
the
tec
can
offer
and
what
is
out
of
scope
of
what
the
tc
can
offer
so
I'll
give
the
example
of
of
gravity,
for
example,
not
not
to
put
on
the
spot,
but
because
we
were
discussing
about
this
yesterday
of,
for
example,
offering
orientation
or
guidance
from
like
softgov
or
from
the
cultural
build
to
other
projects
like.
D
H
I
was
just
gonna
say
I
mean
I
completely
agree.
No
one
owns
any
ideas
there,
but
they're
I
mean
maybe
it's
like
if
there
is
like
a
little
tip
of
the
hat
like
vive
iv
works
for
general
magic
and
is
in
general,
magic
is
contracted
at
the
low
cost
by
common
stack
to
build
a
reward
system
right
so
general
magic.
This
organization,
that's
like
20
people
and
a
lot
of
people
in
this
call
is,
is
building
the
reward
system
and
investing
into
the
reward
system.
H
So
in
some
ways
it
kind
of
is
right,
and
so
it's
like
there's
these,
like
partnerships
in
all
of
these
projects
in
all
these
products-
and
I
think
I
I
think
the
main
thing
is
that
we
always
try
to
do
tip
tips
of
the
hat
to
general
magic
and
common
stack
since
the
a
lot
of
it
goes
unrewarded
by
the
tc
directly.
But
hopefully
the
reward
system
will
change
that
and
then
and
then
it'll
be
more
direct.
Q
I
just
want
to
know
before
we
close
up
that.
That's
I
mean
we
have
to
consider
that
there's
quantifiers
a
bunch
of
quantifiers
in
that
that
probably
are
not
aware
of
this,
and
if
they
have
their
own
community-
and
they
just
you
know,
take
the
take
the
place
and
try
to
incorporate
their
only.
I
mean
I
feel
like
this.
Q
This
conversation
also
has
to
go
through
all
our
documentation
and
whatever
the
price
system
is
mentioned
or
you
if
you
want
to
acknowledge
this,
it
has
to
go
through
our
interpretation
to
acknowledge
this
and
who
are
the
point
of
contact
like
hey?
If
you
want
to
know
about
the
place,
go
directly
to
the
discord
or
give
us
or
whoever
you
know
sort
of,
we
have
to
resurrect
them,
because
this
is
not
clear
for
anyone,
not
even
for
me
on
the
orientation.
Q
I
I
was
gonna
say
something
similar
edu,
there's
so
many
cases
in
the
world
that
need
what
the
tec
has
built
like
this
whole
infrastructure
combination,
that
is,
the
tec,
can
be
applied
to
so
many
other
organizations
for
benefit.
So
I
would
love
to
know
like
who
are
the
who
to
reach
out
to
to
reproduce
this.
I
What
the
tec
has
done
and
then
a
separate
question
is
I'm
wondering
about
case
studies
because
olivia
you're
talking
about
we
make
general
you
know
the
point
of
the
tc
is
to
make
general
solutions
that
can
benefit
the
whole
world
of
token
engineering,
not
any
one
project,
but
what
about
case
studies?
What,
if
a
k?
What
if
a
specific
case
comes
to
us
and
say
hey?
H
That
that
brings
up
a
great
thing,
there's
the
commons
prize.
I
think
tana
is
going
to
say
the
same
thing,
but
we're
actually
looking
to
the
common
stack
is
looking
for
another
case
study
or
another
commons,
a
community
to
build
a
commons
with,
and
so
there
was
a
tweet
just
yesterday.
G
H
So
there's
a
signal
and
interest
form,
so
there's
kind
of
a
type
form
to
say
I
want
to
make
a
commons
and
we're
gonna
have
like
the
trusted.
Seed
is
gonna
vote
on
the
next
commons
that
the
common
stack
focuses
on
building
with
with
the
community
and
then
and
actually
the
long-term
strategy
of
the
common
stack
is
after
this
next
one,
whoever
wins
the
commons
prize.
H
We
we
actually
want
to
try
to
provide
this
as
a
service
for
other
communities
that
and
that
they
would,
you
know,
bring
in
some
actual
capital
to
support
us
to
continue
like
making
comments
like
mad,
so
that
that's
the
common
stacks
business
model
in
the
long
run
is
to
actually
be
paid
to
launch
commons.
At
least
that's
the
current
one
alongside
the
trusted
seed,
memberships
and
then
the
general
general
magic
will
hopefully
productize
praise
and
be
able
to
launch
that
also
as
a
service
for
other
communities,
we're
first
beta
testing
the
swag
store.
A
Yeah,
it's
okay.
We
are
over
time.
This
was
opened
a
really
interesting
discussion,
and
I
wonder
that
if
it
is
not,
does
not
end
up
being
a
topic
for
our
council,
which
is,
I
think,
this
thursday,
so
yeah.
I
think
that
we
can
dig
into
this
a
lot
more
actually
yeah
thanks
everyone
for
your
time
today,
and
I
think
that
this
is
a
discussion.
We
need
to
continue
so
I'll
make
sure
we
have
some
more
time
for
it.