►
From YouTube: W29 Community Stewards: Hatch timeline and Praise audit!
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tam
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
And
people
join
us,
they
could
join
us
and
it's
just
us
for
right
now,
so
maybe
we'll
save
the
temperature
check.
What
do
we
jump
to
if
it's
us
for,
let's
see
or
maybe
we
do
our
temperature
check
anyway?
So
how
about
zeptimus?
Do
you
want
to
start
off
temperature
check
for
our
community
this
last
year.
B
I
feel
like
there
is
different
things,
especially
on
the
impact
hours
like
some
people.
Some
group
of
people
think
one
way
some
other
group
think
the
other
way
and
yeah
I
feel
stuff,
but
we
should
get
an
agreement
somehow,
but
yeah.
That's
what
I
feel
like.
I
feel
I
feel
yeah
splitness
and
I'll
pass
it
to
libby.
A
I
feel
like
it's
a
very
I've
been
I've
been
having
the
feeling
of
like
looking
retroactively
and
seeing
so
many
mistakes
that
that
now
I
know
what
I
would
have
done,
but
then,
at
the
time
I
didn't
and
then
just
having
this
feeling
of
like
of
learning.
A
Yeah
learning
too
late,
but
there
was
no.
There
is
no
way
to
to
learn
before
something
happens,
so
yeah.
I
think
just
wanting
to
integrate
these
things
and
and
was
hoping
for
some
more
open
dialogue,
and
I
think
we've
been
having
them
in
in
the
impact
our
debates,
so
that
has
been
good
and
and
also
from
this
ama
that
we
just
had
now.
A
It
was
nice
to
see
the
people
that
have
been
joining
and
they
came
because
block
science
recommended
them
to
check
out
the
community
and-
and
it's
just
interesting
to
see
the
the
multiplicity
of
interests
that
people
have
in
the
tc
and
I'll
pass
for
you,
tim
cool,
yeah.
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
what
feels
so
disjointed
and
I
think
about.
We
feel
like
we
have
a
lot
going
on,
so
we
have
speed
and
we
have
a
lot
going
on
and
somehow
it's
in
a
different
direction,
at
least
when
it
comes
to.
A
You
know
that
we
have
a
lot
of
you
know:
sort
of
momentum,
around
analysis
and
now
analyzing
the
impact
our
data
set,
and
then
it
occurred
to
me
that
it's
oh
it's
velocity.
You
know
like
velocity
is
speed,
but
with
the
direction
and
velocity
with
everyone,
speeding
in
a
different
direction
is
almost
sort
of
like
counter.
You
know
productive
in
some
ways,
and
so
I've
been
feeling
like
it's
like.
A
We
have
velocity,
but
directions
are
not
aligned
so
much
so
I
yeah
I've
been
feeling
that
a
lot
you
know,
and
I
I
also
feel
like
most
importantly,
I'm
trying
to
find
the
most
of
like
impartial,
objective
ways
of
looking
at
things,
and
I
find
myself
gravitating
towards
also
that
sort
of
like
impartial.
A
You
know
objective
way
of
looking
at
things
so
making
things
anonymous
and
using
data
to
try
to
reach
conclusions
and
stuff
like
that
is
sort
of
where
I
find
myself
finding
being
most
swayed
and
less
weighed
by
sort
of
passion
or
emotion,
and
I
think
that's
been
pretty
stabilizing.
Actually
I
felt
for
myself
personally
yeah,
I
think
it's
you
know.
I
think
it's
gonna
be
an
interesting
retrospective
tomorrow,
because
this
this
is
it.
A
You
know
it's
like
decisions
are
being
made,
and
I
think
I
don't
think
I
think
it's
very
clear-
and
this
was
prop.
This
was
also
very
clear
from
the
beginning
that
there
is
no
solution
that
makes
everyone
happy,
and
so
I
think
it's
sort
of
like
the
moment
for
us
to
say:
do
we
do
we
go
through
that?
You
know
how
do
we,
how
do
we?
How
do
we
go
through
that,
together,
as
a
team,
so
yeah
I'll
pass
to
cherry.
A
C
I
don't
know
today
well,
yesterday
was
a
very
like
a
stressful
day
like
at
some
point,
yeah
like
it's
it's
it.
There
was
just
like
this
awareness
around
the
toll
on
the
cultural
build
of
what
we've
been
going
through,
and
it's
just
something
that
I
really
I
don't
like
to
see.
C
It's
I
mean
I'm,
I'm
like
letting
it
go
and
trying
to
observe
and
learn
as
much
I'm
nervous
a
little
bit,
because
I
don't
know
what
the
outcome
like
might
be
regarding
a
cultural
build,
but
I
mean
good
times
bad
times,
right
like
if,
if
this
is
this
is
I
feel
that
that
is
going
to
be
also
like
a
a
test
for
for
the
community
I
really
like
and
enjoy
what
what
is
going
on
like
around
the
vote.
C
Sadly,
I
feel
that
this
is
probably
contributing
more
to
stuff
that
that
doesn't
like
belong
as
hours
as
a
cultural
build.
So
regarding
a
temperature
check,
I
I
feel
that
it's
not
it's.
C
It's
definitely
not
as
hot
as
we've
been
having
in
the
past
weeks,
there's
like
this
like
middle
ground
going
on,
and
I'm
trying
to
learn
as
much
as
I
can
from
it,
and
I
am
convinced
that,
like
we're
gonna
like
pull
through
this,
this,
like
decision
that
we're
making-
but
it's
just
like
like
it's
it's
it's
a
different
time
like
it's,
it's
some
stuff
is
changing
and
I
just
can't
wait
to
like
open
the
hatch
like
it's
yeah
like
I.
C
C
I
just
hope
that
that
it's
gonna
be
as
motivating
as
I
think
that
is
gonna
be
for
for
the
whole
community
and
then
in
that
this
can
also
help
improve
like
some
of
the
stuff
and
and
get
get
us
like
back
on
track
for
some
of
the
objectives.
C
Sorry
for
rambling,
you
allowed
me
to
attempt,
so
I'm
I'm
sorry
for
I'm
using
the
the
the
right
but
yeah
that
that's
those
would
be
my
two
sets
I'll
pass
it
to.
E
Cool
yeah,
the
temperature
check,
you
know,
or
I
don't
think
this
is
the
best
week
ever
for
sure.
I
think
this
impact
hour
debate
has
been
a
drain
on
the
emotions
of
of
our
community,
and
I
don't
think
that
it's
unrecoverable,
though
I
think
that
the
the
vibes
are
low.
E
You
know,
but
I
think
once
it's
over.
I
do
believe
that
we
will
be
able
to
reignite
the
fire,
especially
when
we're
all
together
and
when
so
many
of
us
are
in
paris
together.
I
think
everyone
on
this
call.
So
that's
good.
I
don't
feel
bad
for
that
one,
but
yeah.
E
I
think
everyone
will
be
really
happy
together
in
paris,
and
you
know
there
was
like
a
minor
like
a
a
quick
thing
of
like
oh
no
sherman
sherman
doesn't
like
what
we're
doing
you
know,
and
there
was
quick
recovery
and
she
even
sent
me
a
message
today
that,
where
like
after
we
had
a
two-hour
call,
it
was
only
supposed
to
be
one
hour
honestly,
I
don't
think
I
did
a
great
job
in
the
call
I'm
having
some
personal
issues
and
it
leaked
into
the
call,
and
so
it's
like
you
know
it's
too
bad
but
she's,
but
she
said
that
you
know
I.
E
I
said
that
we
need
to
refine
our
narrative
a
lot
and
thank
you
for
the
help
with
with
some
of
the
wording,
and
she
said
together,
we
can
do
this,
you
know,
and
oh
my
god,
is
that
what
I
needed
today,
you
know
it
was
like.
Yes,
together
we
can
do
this
sherman.
You
know
she
wrote
the
book
on
token
engineering,
so
just
so
happy
to
have
her
on
board
and
I
feel,
like
you
know,
the
personal
outreach
can
help
a
lot
and
yeah.
E
I
think
I
think
that
we
just
need
to
get
through
this
vote
and
get
to
the
get
to
a
breathing
point.
You
know
and
and
get
together
in
paris
and
really
like
realign
with
ourselves
and
and
reinvigorate
the
energy
and
yeah
we've
been
sprinting
for
so
long,
and
you
know
we're
so
close.
E
E
You
know
but
we're
finally
there
and
I'm
super
stoked
to
be
with
all
you
guys
and
to
make
this
happen.
I
I
I
don't
think
it's.
I
think
it
we're
in
a
down
point,
but
that's
okay
and
I'll
pass
it
to
katie.
Did
you
go.
F
Sorry,
I'm
late
so
happy
together,
yeah
togetherness
and
yeah.
I
I
want
to
just
pick
up
on
some
of
the
the
sentiments
you
just
expressed
griff
because
you're,
the
only
one
I
heard
tonight
today,
sorry
about
that
everybody,
but
yeah
realigning
that's
good.
I
mean
I
think
we
have
to
we
have
to.
We
have
some.
F
We
have
some
food
on
our
plates
that
we
need
to
to
really
look
at
and
take
care
of
and
digest
and
properly
seriously.
You
know
take
into
account
and
then
we
will
have
that
breathing
time
and
yeah.
So
so,
looking
forward
to
seeing
y'all-
and
I
I
agree-
probably
with
the
general
sentiment
of
what's
been
going
around-
we've
had
some
some
pretty
tense
moments,
serious
moments.
But
it's
important
to
really
look
at
that
squarely
in
the
face,
because
we're
making
decisions
here
that
that
do
matter
and
that
people
are
are
gonna,
be
looking
at.
F
D
Yeah,
you
can
pass
back
to
me.
Thank
you
same
place
to
check.
D
I
think
that,
even
if
I
have
been
some
debates
and
even
if
the
opinions
are
not
the
the
ones
that
even
if
the
opinions
do
not
agree,
I
do
feel
that
we
have
had
enough
of
an
elastic
community
to
sort
of
sustain
this
kind
of
disagreements,
and
I
feel
that
the
next
step
will
be
to
take
care
of
the
people
who
has
been
disagreeing
and
trying
to
sort
of
have
a
kind
of
found,
not
understanding
with
them,
not
only
but
an
empathic
process
with
them
to
just
like
make
sure
that
they
understand
that
this
agreement
doesn't
mean
that
anything
else,
but
that
it's
just
a
disagreement.
D
That
is
a
community,
and
I
feel
that
we
have
built
enough
fantastic
system
to
make
it
able
to
support
that.
And-
and
I
don't
know,
I
feel
that
I
feel
it's
way
more
stable
than
when
this
phrase
stuff
came
out
at
the
beginning,
and
I
feel
that
opinions
has
been
kind
of
better
defined
and
we
have
a
process.
D
And
and
yes,
we
are
finding
some
kind
of
situation
that
you
may
think
will
destabilize
and
not,
but
I
do
believe
that
whatever
thing
we
are
finding
out
in
this
process,
we
just
have
to
make
a
step
back.
I
understand
this
is
an
experiment.
This
is
the
first
time
this
is
kind
of
been
been
doing,
so
we
should
have
a
margin
of
error
and
we
should
be
understanding
that
there
is.
D
This
kind
of
things
will
happen
and
not
because
it's
an
excuse,
but
because
there's
nature
of
I
think
that
it's
new
and
that
we
don't
have
a
registry
of
how
it's
been,
how
it's
perfectly
done.
So
I
don't
know.
I
feel
that
we
should
not
let
ourselves
down
just
because
there
is
this
agreement,
but
rather
focusing
on
how
we
can
build
from
that
and
and
just
understanding
that
it's
okay
and
it's
it's
acceptable
and
the
system
can
allow
it.
So
that's
my
two
cents
on
it
back
to
you,
then.
A
And
nate,
as
you
were,
just
joined
us
I'd
like
to
also
do
give
you
the
floor
for
a
temperature
check
on
our
community
and
as
we
have
some
well,
we
only
have
very
few
people
when
we
started
we're
just
sort
of
not
not
timing.
It
so
just
yeah
share
what
you
feel
like
you
want
to
share
around
community
and
personal
and
stewards
temperature
check.
G
Yeah,
I
think
it's
going
pretty
well,
I
think,
there's
a
little
bit
of
tension,
possibly
around
the
impact
hour,
intervention
vote
but
yeah.
I
think
it's
just
you
know
it's
part
of
the
process
that
we're
doing
as
an
experiment
and
just
getting
used
to
new
procedures.
Maybe
some
of
us,
you
know
not
used
to
it
or
maybe
not
you
know
prepared
for
it.
G
I
have
had
strong
feelings
about
it
through
throughout
this
process
myself
and
it's
one
of
those
things
where
we
have
an
open
community.
That's
deciding
on
on
what
to
do
about
a
situation
and
we're
approaching
it
in
a
democratic
manner,
and
I
think
that's
the
nature
of
things
and
you
know
just
keep
communicating.
I
think
that
everything
else
just
seems
really
fine
and
everybody
seems
pretty
excited
and
positive
about
the
about
the
hatch.
So
once
we
get
this
resolved
and
move
forward,
I
think
we're
going
to
be
quite
all
right.
A
And
so
we
move
on
to
have
you
posted
in
the
forum
this
sprint,
you
don't
have
to
answer
it,
but
just
a
reminder
to
engage
in
the
forum
and
ideally
share
something
novel
from
your
working
group,
hatch
timeline.
So
here's
such
soft
dates,
but
these
are
the
latest
of
the
dates
internal
we're
not
publishing
this.
A
This
is
not
for
to
go
out
in
any
comms
to
be
specific
or
in
any
like
formal
way
to
be
specific,
but
here
is
what
we
sort
of
have
as
soft
dates
for
when
we
can
hatch
and
really
what
it'll
come
down
to.
Is
this
so
our
hatch,
readiness
checklist
and
specifically
this
so
I
don't
know
if
it's
worth
maybe
mentioning-
maybe
we'll
go
through
the
zenhub
board,
specifically
to
go
through
the
critical
to
hatch
issues
which
are
still
open
and
see
what
where
we
are.
A
So
maybe
we
start
with
libya
with
softcup.
Do
you
want
to
go
through
the
critical
to
hatch
issues
that
are
still
in
the
working
group
for
softgov
yeah?
Does
ra
host
runoff
session
can
be
closed.
A
A
A
F
A
F
A
A
Okay,
all
right
cool.
I
don't
think
santi
is
able
to
join
us
today,
but
then
it's
just
a
final
review
of
the
legal
dots
which
I'm
fairly
certain
happens.
Shall
we
do
chewy?
Do
you
want
to
talk
about
the
comms,
critical
to
hatch
pieces
and
what's
left,
to
do
on
them?
If
anything?
Yes,.
C
Animation,
video:
we
are
pushing
forward
to
have
an
update
this
week,
something
that
we
can
give
notes
for
and
to
have
corrections
over
the
weekend.
So
we
can
have
this
ready
by
monday
and
tuesday.
Everything
can
be
in
in
place.
F
B
C
Yeah
yeah,
it's
it's!
It's
been
working
really
good
one,
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
talking
to
manu
about
that
I
mean
when
we
have
the
finished
video.
This
is
gonna
be
brought
up,
but
I
I
do
feel
that
we
appeal
to
this
video
in
the
hatch
we
it
it
really
like,
defines
the
community
and
trill
build
around
it.
C
However,
people
that
go
in,
like
people
that
are
gonna,
be
coming
in
into
the
hatch
front
end
are
people
that
will
probably
need
some
kind
of
like
explanation
or
supporting
material
about
the
process
and
what
exactly
they
are
doing.
So
I
feel
that
this
need
is
better
covered
by
the
animation
video.
C
So
I
mean
I'm
like
I'll,
say
it
again.
When,
when
it's
ready,
we
can
get
together,
we
can
all
get
together
and
discuss
it.
However,
I
do
feel
that
eventually,
during
the
hatch,
this
video
is
gonna
be
needed
in
in
in
the
front
page,
and
we
have
many
other
options
for
promoting
the
community,
video
in
other
channels,
other
platforms,
and
it's
something
that
like
for
an
animated
video
that
explains
what
the
hatch
is.
C
A
Okay,
I
think
I
I
agree-
we
could
push
this
decision
to
a
later
time,
but
also
if,
if
the
animated
video
is
not
ready,
that
won't
necessarily
block
the
hatch
is
a
very
good
point
that
I
think
septimus
is
raising.
A
C
Acid
laser
is,
is
working
on
a
calendar
on
an
improved
like
more
understandable
version
than
the
one
that
I
made.
So
this
is
this
is
how
we're
gonna
be.
This
is
how
we're
gonna
be
replying
and
closing
this
issue
also
with
like
a
forum
post
and
something
that
is
just
like
more
followers,
so
so
so
I
would
say
that
it's
it's
it's
ready.
It
is
critical
for
the
hatch,
but
it's
just
like
we're
working
on
a
way
like
a
more
efficient
way
to
communicate.
It.
C
Yeah,
yes,
but
I
would
still
like
to
just
have
the
right
information
in
in
in
this
issue,
so
yeah
yeah
as
soon
as
I
have
like
the
final
form
I'll
update
the
the
issue
include
these
graphics
with
it.
And
yes,
I
think
that
would
be.
A
Hey
one
thing:
that's
probably
important
to
share
that
came
out
of
the
hatch
outreach
call
just
the
last
hour
was
that
the
hatchery
handbook
is
sort
of
going
to
be
the
is
going
to
be
there's
going
to
be
the
hatchery
handbook,
which
will
be
more
comprehensive,
but
there's
going
to
be
like
a
skinny
info
sheet
with
just
the
checklist
and
the
for
our
hatcher
and
the
parameters
as
they
apply
to
hatchers,
so
the
sort
of
framing
of
the
parameters
so
that
a
hatcher
can
understand
what
they
mean.
A
What
the
parameters
mean
to
someone,
and
this
sort
of
like
skinny
info
sheet
is
probably
something
that
will
be
very
good
if
coms
has
access
to
and
can
can
amplify
as
well.
C
A
Cool
but
there's
going
to
be
two
versions:
there's
going
to
be
one,
that's
just
like
very
short,
not
very
short
but
shorter
and
can
go
out
pretty
soon,
maybe
as
soon
as
the
as
the
end
of
this
week,
if
not
the
beginning
of
next
week
and
then
a
hatchery
handbook,
that's
more
of
a
it's
more
voluminous
voluminous
and
has
more
instructions,
and
perhaps
even
videos,
that's
still
under
being
being
worked
on.
A
C
C
We
already
published
the
the
community
video
we're
already
like
tweeting
about
it.
It's
already
part
of
our
hatch
campaign
plans
so
yeah,
I
would
say
we're
good.
A
Okay,
cool
so
from
com
standpoint,
then
we
aren't
signaling
that
we're
ready
for
hatch.
We.
A
Okay,
so
then
we
have
to
get
rid
of
this
campaign
plan.
If
it's,
if
there's
a
critical
to
hatch
on
the
board,
well
then
we're
not.
We
have
to
get
rid
of
it.
So
comms
is
ready.
Let's
definitely
change
that
signal,
but
then
this
can't
be
critical
to
hatch.
It
has
to
be
something
else
like
really
important
for
us
to
have
finished.
C
Okay,
can
you
can
you.
A
C
It,
yes,
yes,
can
you
close
it
and
just
like
tag
me
and
say
that,
like
I'll,
be
posting
the
the
campaign
plan
in
the
forum
just
so
that,
like
if
people
come
across
this
issue,
just
so
that
they
know
where
to
look
for
it.
C
I
mean
if
well,
if,
if
an
issue
is
closed,
I
I
don't
think
I
can
post
it
anymore
or
can
I
like?
Can
I
keep
posting
on
an
issue
if
it's
closed.
A
Well,
I
would
say
just
post
the
draft
campaign
plan
and
we
know
now
it's
a
work
in
progress
like
it's
been
built.
It's
mostly
done.
It's
probably
like
80
percent
done
or
whatever
some
number
percent
done,
but
if
you
can
just
drop
it
in
here
and
close
this
issue,
then
we'll
say
it's
closed.
Does
that
sound
good?
Yes,.
C
A
F
A
Cool
love,
these
droppers
great
and
then
griff.
I
think
common
swarm
is
next.
E
Just
for
now,
let
me
just
check
in
with
sam
he's
right
upstairs
and
I'll.
Just
like
get
him
in
this
call.
I
think
one
thing
that's
blocking.
I
don't
think
it's
blocking
common
storm,
I
kind
of
want
to
pull
it
out
to
be
its
own
blocker
and
that's
just
finalizing
the
impact.
Our
list
maybe
make
that
a
check
that's
outside
of
common
storm,
but
it
is
kind
of
also
blocking
common
swarm,
but
I
don't.
I
think
they
should
be
able
to
be
ready
without
that,
but
sam,
what
what?
E
What
is
blocking
the
common
swarm
from
being
ready
to
hatch.
I
J
Hello
guys
we
have
an
ad
rehearsal
that
will
be
closed
very
soon.
I
I
had
a
meeting
with
adria
on
the
yesterday
and
he
was
telling
me
to
do
some
changes
that
are
not
affecting
so
much,
but
I
would
like
to
change
them
before
before
we
we
finish.
We
we,
we
launched
the
hatch
so.
J
And
but
we
are
mostly
done,
the
the
last
rehearsal
is
is.
J
E
E
Okay:
okay,
now
that's
right
because
we're
on
rankin
or
sorry
we're
on
next
time,
but
gardens
is
honoring
me:
okay,
okay,
so
there's
some
very
minor
tweaks
to
the
smart
contracts
that
the
auditor
requested
that
need
to
be
fixed
and
we're
gonna
finalize
the
vote.
But
these
are
all.
These
are
relatively
small
things
yeah
like
thursday.
J
Yeah
yeah
totally
like
tomorrow.
Actually
it
could
be
launched
without
these
changes,
but
it's
better
if
we
do
them
now
so.
E
E
A
H
Very
it
sounds
very
good
to
hear
sam
is
being
so
cautious.
I
think
it's
going
to
benefit
all
of
us
in
the
long
run.
H
J
Up
with
the
securities
like
during
this
all
this
month
is
like
it's
going
to
have
a
lot
of
money
and
it's
complicated
the
all
the
these
contracts
are
complicated,
it's
like,
but
we
we
have
to
launch
and
we
we
have
to
learn.
Just
not
I
mean
this
situation
cannot
be
drawn
out.
Yeah,
it's
it's
taking
so
long
so
yeah
you
will
have
the
the
check
tomorrow
tomorrow.
A
I
just
I
from
my
perspective,
I'm
not
pushing
for
the
check
I'm
pushing
for
a
very
secure
system
or
versus
launching
early
and
ending
up
losing
lots
of
money.
So
I
would
say:
let's,
let's
make
sure
it's
safe,
yeah.
J
E
Sure,
well
for
critical
to
hatch,
I'm
still
making
this
craze
issue.
I
don't
know
if
there's
anyone
else
who
wants
to
go
before
me.
I
E
There's
a
there
is
an
epic
that
needs
to
have
smaller
issues,
and
I
really
do
want
some.
I
need
support
on
it
for
us
to
be
successful,
so
hi
everyone.
Luckily
we
have
our
big
guns
on
it.
Ivy
is
all
about
it.
Ivy
and
freshell
are
in
vivei.
V
are
all
helping
me
work
on
the
audit,
so
I
mean
there's
no
better
team
than
that.
E
E
There's
been
so
much
around
the
around
around
praise
and
now,
like
you
know,
we're
doing
an
audit,
and
I
already
know
that
there's
changes
that
need
to
be
made
and
guess
it's
probably
going
to
be
a
touchy
subject,
I'm
just
going
to
throw
that
out
there
you
know
before
I
was
like
yeah,
we'll
fix
the
deductions
at
the
end,
and
now
it's
like.
E
How
do
we
deal
with
that?
It's
gonna,
be
I'm
worried,
I'm
really
worried.
I
don't
know
the
best
strategy
around
this.
I
feel,
like
I
see
a
car
on
the
train
tracks
and
the
trains
moving.
E
What
do
we
do
so,
let's
run
through
the
whole
the
whole
scenario
right.
So
we
have
the
audit.
We
need
to
do
a
te
praise
party,
hopefully
on
friday,
I'd
love
it.
If
someone
else
wanted
to
lead
that
charge,
I'm
not!
Let's
let
let
me
go
through
the
list
and
then
maybe
we
can
get
some
volunteers.
E
Final
praise,
quant,
ivy,
I'm
leaning
on
ivy
a
lot
right
now,
she's
already
got
ygg
it's
going
to
be
scheduled
for
11
eastern,
which
is
5
p.m.
Our
time,
europe
time
my
time,
europe
time,
5,
pm
europe,
time,
praise
kwan
on
sunday
that'll
be
the
final
praise
quan
it's.
So
we
need
to
do
the
te
praise
party
before
sunday,
ideally
friday
and
then
like
do
we
do
it?
If
the
proposal
that
asks
for
the
tv
praise
party
doesn't
win
okay
and
then
then
we
have
the
audit
adjustments.
E
They'll,
be
they
should
be
dotted.
Adjustments
will
be
fine.
The
thing
is,
how
do
we
get
approval
for
these
adjustments
from
the
community?
Do
we
even
touch
this
thing?
I
think
it's
important
to.
I
think
it's
important
to
follow
the
practices
that
we've
been
using,
but
I
would
love
to
hear
people's
thoughts
on
this
and
then
there's
people
who
have
not
activated
their
trusted
seed.
We
have
to
go
through
the
list
and
make
sure
that
okay,
this
screen
name
matches
someone
who
is
on
the
trusted
seed
right.
E
We
have
their
telegram
or
discord
handles
in
that
process.
I
worry
that
some
people
might
have
two
things
and
they'll
only
get
one
of
their
hours,
so
it'll
be
important
to
like.
Also
have
some
awareness
be
like.
Who
is
each
of
these
people,
and
maybe
it's
just
the
long
tail
and
we
can
vote
in
the
hatch
now
to
fix
it.
We
can
mint
tokens
with
the
hatch
style
to
fix
that
later.
So
I'm
not
like
so
worried
about
it.
If
someone
comes
up
like
no,
I
had
four
impact
hours.
E
That
was
my
screen
name
too.
It's
like,
I
think
we
as
a
community,
can
vote
to
give
them
some
tokens
in
in
return
at
the
end,
maybe
right
so
I
don't,
but
we
still
need
to
do
the
best
that
we
can
on
making
sure
that
we
don't
like
take
away
partial
hours
from
people
and
then
then
we'll
have
a
complete
list
that
can
be
minted
and
it
has
to
be
ready
before
we
can
hatch.
E
So
maybe
before
we
start
dishing
out
like
help
me
like
support
on
this,
maybe
we
can
sam.
What
do
you
think
it'd
be
okay
to
have
just
a
round
on
like
what
do
we
do
with
the
audit
adjustments.
E
Yeah,
okay,
great
so
just
for
more
context,
it
is
very
likely
that
ygg
will
get
like
around
200
extra
impact
hours
because
he
was
being
deducted
and
because
we
I
thought
he
was
going
to
charge
us
for
money,
but
then
he
just
never
applied
on.
He
never
actually
filled
up
the
milestones
on
giveth
and
then
he
just
said
later
he
didn't
want
to
be
paid.
E
So
that's
like
that's
like
it's
going
to
be
a
lot.
He
gets
a
lot
of
impact
hours,
he's
a
token
engineer,
who's
helping
us
so
like
praise
kwan's
go
wild
with
him.
Jake
is
likely
to
get
more
impact
hours
because
he
never
made
a
last
payment
request.
E
And
then
there's
just
probably
going
to
be
a
few
other
people
that
you
know
when
they
started
they
weren't
being
paid,
but
then
they
got
paid
retroactively
or
like
after
we
had
done
the
praise,
quant
they're
like
yes,
I
want
payment
or
there
was
miscommunication
and
they
didn't
so
I
I
think
the
swings
are
going
to
be
like
30
somewhere
between
you
know,
source
for
for
probably
like
five
or
six
people.
The
swings
will
be
larger
than
30
impact
hours.
E
A
Well,
I
think,
there's
two
possible
outcomes
based
on
the
proposals
that
are
out
there.
So
if
no
abnormal
intervention
wins
then
we'll
have
the
t,
praise
party.
E
A
Final
praise,
quant
and
and
all
of
those
adjustments
and
then,
if
praise
megadon
wins,
I
we'll
have
a
different
process
to
integrate
the
changes
they
are
proposing
and
we'll
have
to
see
what
that
looks
like,
but
I
think
independent
of
those
results.
A
So
I'm
thinking,
if
praise
megadon
wins,
would
the
audit
even
be
necessary
because
they're
proposing
a
restructure
of
that
whole
thing?
So
maybe
it
would
be
intelligent
to
wait
until
tomorrow
for
the
results
before
having
all
that
work.
That
seems
like
a
lot
of
work
and
then,
if
no
abnormal
intervention
wins
then
scheduling
the
audit
and
and
get
gathering
all
the
help
that
is
needed,
I'm
down
to
help.
A
I
feel
like
we
can't
do
anything
until
like
we'll
have
the
results
that
we
have
like
the
the
voting
will
be
closed,
we'll
hatch
and
and
after
the
hatch
after
people
come
in
and
we'll
have
a
much
better
look
of
how
the
tc
tokens
distribution
work
after,
like
everyone
has
tokens
and
then
maybe
if
people
want
to
make
more
proposals
after
that,
that's
the
natural
flow
of
it,
and
I
think
humility
also
to
express
this.
You
know
like
this
process
was
very
subjective,
like
it
was
few
people
working
on
it.
A
The
people
who
were
working
on
it
were
very
busy,
like
you,
grip,
have
the
expertise
of
the
spreadsheets
and,
and
everybody
knows
that
are
really
busy.
So
I
think
just
like
having
maybe
a
message
to
say
that
you
know
like
this
is
how
the
process
went.
It
was
a
bit
chaotic
and
now
we're
willing
to
fix
it,
and
I
think
people
have
like
an
open
understanding
for
that
and
I'll
pass
to
two.
C
E
Just
really
like,
okay,
the
big
the
big
questions
I
want
to
know
are
like
do
we
do
a
tea
praise
party
if
we
don't,
if,
even
if
the
the
that
vote
doesn't
win
and
like
how
do
we
deal
with
the
fact
that
the
audit
is
likely
to
make
some
major
changes
in
or
the
audit
will
suggest
that
we
do
major
changes
to
the
impact
hour
list?
Is
that
something
we
need
a
vote
for?
Is
that
like
like?
How
do
I
get
it?
E
You
know
ivy
and
freshell
and
me
and
vive
iv
we're
all
doing
this
audit.
It's
already
started.
It
should
be
complete
by
the
weekend.
I
hope
some
of
the
things
are
big
changes
mostly
around
the
deductions.
E
Other
things
are
small
changes
like
did
the
bot
ever
go
down
and
some
praise
was
was
not
quantified
and
then
we
just
add
that
to
the
quantification.
On
sunday
there
were
some.
You
know
there
was
some
praise
misattributed
to
dan
lessa.
That
was
really
supposed
to
go
to
daniel.
Oh
right,
there's
little
things
like
that.
That'll
be
fixed
and,
like
it's
a
it's
like
a
change,
it's
like
another
praise,
quant.
E
Basically,
the
praise
quan
audit,
so
how
do
we
transparently
and
openly
like
tell
people
this
is
happening
but
not
like,
but
hopefully
also
not
like
make
it
delay
the
hatch
before
you
know
we
gotta
launch
before
paris
gotta
get
out
there.
G
So
I
just
wanna
clarify
something
so
real,
quick,
the
entire.
You
know
the
the
hours
impact
hours
are
going
to
ygg
and
jake,
and
all
these
you
know,
mishaps,
it's
a
completely
separate
thing
than
the
impact
hour.
Intervention
proposal
aspect,
like
those
things
were
agreed
upon
agreements
beforehand
and
it
shouldn't
like
I
from
from
my
perspective,
shouldn't
even
be
a
topic
of
discussion
like
those
are
the
agreements
we
had.
If
somebody
forgot
to
get
paid,
then
they
should
get
the
impact
hours
that
they
they
they
earned
during
that
time
period.
G
C
I
just
you
might
my
thought
in
the
matter.
I
always
liked
the
idea
of
the
praise
party.
To
be
honest,
so
so
I
mean
knowing
that
this
doesn't
really
have
something
to
do
with
with
impact
our
quant
discussion.
I
would.
I
would
support
the
idea
of
of
a
praise
party
where
we
could
recognize
like
subject.
Subject
matter.
Experts,
however,
like
if,
if
if
the
vote
is
looking
like
the
proposal
that
is
gonna
like
eventually
win
already
has
like
this.
C
This
party
like
proposed
into
it,
we
yeah
we
could.
We
could
go
like
get
in
and
in
work
on
that,
but
I
mean
this
is
like,
of
course
like
us,
as
as
nate
was
a
cleric
clarifying
like
very
like
separate
from
the
from
a
praise
discussion.
So
I
would
support
that
idea,
regardless
and
and
yeah
like
it
could
go
like
through
the
same
process
as
as
always.
D
Regarding
this,
I
think
that
I
agree
with
what
nate
mentioned.
There
are
a
little
bit
of
separate
things,
and
then
it
is
an
audit
and
for
me,
audits,
are
things
that
are
in
a
higher
hierarchy
in
the
sense
of
they
are
a
sense-making
tool.
Therefore,
it's
more
of
a
correction:
it's
not
something
that
it's
a!
If
it
says
it's
a
correction,
then,
by
a
standard
it
corrects
something
that
was
done
wrong,
and
I
wouldn't
do
that.
I
wouldn't
put
that
to
vote
just
because
of
the
nature
of
an
audit
itself.
D
It
is
meant.
Is
there
is
it's
there,
meaning
to
fix
this
kind
of
situations,
and
I
will
just
be
honest
and
publicly
transparent
about
it
explaining
through?
Why
are
we
doing
these
changes
or
why
are
we
doing
these
minifications
or
adding
or
minus
or
taking
out
or
adding
impact
hours
to
certain
people?
But
I
do
not
see
how
this
adjustments
to
very
specific
things
will
affect
the
hatch
like.
I
don't
see
how
it
could
block
besides
people
who
will
want
to
know
more
or
people
who
may
challenge
that,
I
don't.
D
A
F
Yeah,
I
just
split
hairs
just
for
a
minute
to
put
it
on
the
real
quickly.
If
I
can
just
from
a
logical
perspective,
I
want
to
agree
with
what
everyone
says,
but
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
actually
the
points
we're
making
are
the
same
points
for
the
impact
hour
analysis
and
that
is
to
say
prior
agreements,
mistakes
being
corrected.
I
mean
these
are
the
same
issues
we're
facing
and
that's
why
we
launched
the
impact.
Our
analysis,
the
difference-
and
this
is
very
important.
F
The
difference
is
that
these
are
corrections
within
the
system,
as
it
was
known
already
just
split
hairs
just
for
a
second.
I
totally
agree
with
what
everybody's
saying
from
nate
and
griff
and
eduardo
and
onward,
but
I
just
want
to
refine
that
so
that
we
don't
raise
a
new
argument
to
say
well,
but
we're
saying
the
same
thing:
blah
blah
blah,
because
it's
not
it's
not
the
same
thing.
That's
all
thanks!
Tam
back
to
you.
E
F
A
So
as
long
as
the
it's
explained
well,
the
changes
that
are
made
are
explained
and
there's
data
that
provides
I'm
going
to
call
it
evidence.
But
really
it's
just
transparency.
So
people
don't
have
to
jump
into
that
and
try
to
wrangle
in
the
numbers,
but
if
you
could
pull
it
out
to
share
with
everyone,
that
would
be
amazing.
I
think
in
terms
of
support.
K
B
No,
I
was
just
saying,
like
I
agree
with
tom,
like
if
human
mistakes
were
done
on
the
deductions
and
that
stuff,
I
think
we
should
correct
it
and
yeah
that
should
be
fine.
You
know
like
we
humans,
we
do
mistakes
and
if
we
see
them,
we
rectify
them
and
and
as
long
as
it's
transparent
and
provides
evidence,
I
think
yeah
just
go
for
it.
E
Okay,
awesome,
I
feel,
like
everyone
went
and,
as
tim
said,
we
have
three
minutes
left.
I
have
a
I'm
curious
if
anyone
wants
to
help
lead
the
pr
te
praise
party.
E
My
thoughts
on
it
honestly
are
just
to
go
talk
to
some
token
engineers
through
dms
collect
a
lot
of
names
of
token
engineers
that
were
impactful
on
the
founding
of
token
engineering
or
contributed
a
lot
and
then
tell
everyone
that
hey
on
friday.
It's
token
engineer,
praise
party
all
day,
friday
and
saturday.
If
you
want
get
that
in
and
then
we'll
have
a
list
of
names
like
tell
us
what
these
people
did
and
but
someone's
gotta
manage
it.
E
We
gotta
dish
out
praise
giver
roles
to
token
engineers
that
want
to
participate,
and
we
got
to
be
loud
about
it
and
tell
people
hey.
Are
you
a
token
engineer
you
know,
or
do
you
know
any
token
engineers
that
deserve
praise
for
doing
token
engineering
get?
You
know
please
praise
party,
ideally
on
friday.
G
I
can
support
shieldo
there
you
go.
I
would
say
that
if
we
can
get
like
at
least
a
starter
list,
that
would
be
very
helpful
and
just
kind
of
figure
out
who
we
can
broach
about.
D
Cool
we
can.
We
can
follow
up
this
griffin
tomorrow's
morning
meeting.
E
Okay,
great
and
and
probably
getting
angela
and
chevnam
in
on
it,
jeff
and
jess
would
also
be
good,
although
they've
done
a
few
of
these
already
so
most
of
the
people
that
they
are
really
believe
in
have
done
it,
but
it'd
be
good.
You
know
we
there's
lots
of
people
who
believe
token
engineers
should
get
more
impact
hours,
so
we
should
try
to
get
them
involved
and
then
does
anyone
want
to
come
into
the
audit
parties
and
support
that.
E
A
E
E
We'll
just
we'll
just
move
the
party
to
like
kafka,
room
and
we'll
just
be
in
there.
So
anyone
who
wants
to
help
with
the
audit
can
jump
in
there.
A
Cool
and
then
the
quant
for
the
final
praise
queen,
we
were
talking
about
having
the
roles
rotated,
and
that
was
something
we
initially
thought,
but
I
think
it
wasn't
so
we
didn't.
We
didn't
really
advocate
for
it
to
have
quantifications
done
for
like.
If
one
person
did
two
sessions,
then
they
should
stay
at
least
like
one
session,
without
doing
it
or
something
and
have
more
stewards
or
like
having
a
token
engineer,
would.
A
E
Ygg
you
told
ivy
11
p.m.
Eastern
standard
time,
are
you
hey?
I'm
sorry!
I
am
good
point.
Are
you
flexible
on
that
at
all,
or
is
that
the
moment?
That's
that's
the
moment
for
sure.
E
So
could
we
do
it,
would
you
be
down
to
do
it
one
hour
after
the
params
party.
E
E
A
E
I
I
do
know
that
the
earliest
ygg
can
do
conflicts
with
some
giveth
calls
that
I
have
and,
like
I
love
giveth
it's
right
here.
I
really
should
go
to
the
community
call
on
sunday.
H
But
wait
so
what
does
that
mean.
A
E
I
could
try
to
make
it
earlier.
I
could
do
it,
I
I
can
skip
the
giveth
meme
party.
I
don't
need
to
do
that
and
I
don't
need
to
meet
with
chewie
either
so
like
those
are
my
other
calls,
but
I
could
so
I
could
do
it
as
early
as
7
p.m.
E
A
Should
we
yeah,
I
see
what
you're
saying
it
but
did
ivy
is
ivy
handling
it
because
she's
so
capable.
I
feel
like
she's,
going
to.
E
So
I
have
the
information
from
her
best
that
I
do,
which
was
that
ygg
could
do
this.
So
I
mean
the
question
is:
do
we
keep
it
in
ambiguity
and
see
what
angela
says
or
do
we
set
a
time
right.
E
E
F
E
Sorry,
the
discord
just
shut
down
on
me,
but
I'll
set
the
calendar,
invite
and
push
it
push
it
for
that
time.
F
F
K
Okay,
I
gotta
hop
now
so
I'll
see
y'all
later
and
I'll.
See
you
on
sunday
for
that
quant
praise
labs
on
friday,
I'll
be
around
in
the
community,
so
have.