►
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tamara
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Fire
man
love
these
debates
are
so
well
attended.
We
have
to
like
turn
off
our
videos,
so
everyone
can
come
in
lots
of
votes
already
it's
a
neck
and
neck
race
and
I
think
the
results
have
a
good
chance
of
flipping
so
not
to
mention.
I
have
sem
in
this
other
room,
deploying
the
last
test
version,
I'm
so
happy
somehow
by
some
magic
he
really
stuffed
it
up
and-
and
you
know,
has
been
testing
the
hell
out
of
it.
B
We've
had
two
good
test
deployments
that,
where
we
nailed
the
parameter
sets
exactly
how
they're
supposed
to
be,
and
now
we're
doing
the
last
test
with
with
a
difference
in
the
in
that
amount
of
dye,
that's
going
in
so
we
can
practice
parameterizing
and
adjusting
once
and
then
we're
actually
changing
up
the
launch
plan
a
little
bit
because
we've
done
so
many
tests.
Now
we
found
a
way
to
exclude
block
scout
from
our
testing
procedure.
B
So
we
don't
have
this
delay
so
we'll
probably
won't
have
to
deploy
a
day
early,
we'll
just
wait
until
the
final
results
and
then
deploy
it'll.
Take
like
two
and
a
half
to
four
hours
max
to
deploy.
That's
assuming
that
there's
some
big
problems,
but
there
won't
be
because
we've
deployed
so
many
times
at
this
point.
So
that's
just
it
feels
really
good.
It
feels
like
they
give
it
the
launch
where
it's
like.
We
probably
did
too
much
testing,
which
is
what
we
need
to
do.
C
Yeah
temperature
is
hot
56
votes,
that's
so
58.
Now
that's
crazy.
It's
like
unheard
of,
like
58
people,
voting
on
a
on
a
down
aiding
down
like
that,
a
dial
that
didn't
even
fully
launch.
Yet
it
feels
really
incredible-
and
this
is
like
major
props
to
all
the
coordination
that
we've
been
have
having
here.
That
has
been
built
for
so
long
to
be
working
flawlessly
now
and
yeah.
It's
beautiful
to
see
everyone's
engagement
and
I
think
the
level
of
education
being
built
in
the
community
is
not
to
be
undertaken.
C
Also,
like
people
were
actually
understanding
about
these
proposals,
and
this
was
the
goal
we
had
when
we
started
like
after
the
primary
votes
of
like
okay,
we
didn't
have
such
a
good
voter
turnout
there.
How
can
we
actually
educate
more
people
to
participate
in
this?
So
I
think
we
nailed
it
and
also
yesterday,
angela
was
just
like
so
impressed
about
the
voter's
pamphlet
she
was
like.
C
I
think
every
community
should
have
this
never
seen
such
good
resources
for
a
token
lunch,
and
then
we
started
to
talk
about
how
how
we
could
improve
the
token
engineering
aspect
of
it
like
for
future
iterations,
and
she
was
super
happy
to
collaborate
with
that,
and
I
think
this
is
just
to
start
for
more
and
more
people
to
want
to
collaborate
with
this
model
that
we're
building.
So
I
think
it's
just
amazing.
What's
happening
and
I'll
pass
to
you
and.
D
Thank
you.
There
are
very
two
distinct
feelings
for
me
as
a
special
check.
The
first
one
is
the
full
circle
feeling
of
starting
building
up
the
hatchery
outreach
and
try
to
reach
to
this
point.
If
we
ever
could-
and
I
felt
like
for
me-
it
I
felt
accomplished
in
that
sense-
and
secondly,
there
was
this
guy
who
we
barely
talk.
We
just
send
messages
for
outreach,
and
sometimes
we
have
exchange
any
other
conversation
and
he
he
messaged
me
a
few
weeks
ago
and
he's
like
hey.
D
Have
you
been
happy
holidays?
I
hope
you're
good
happy
christmas
and
it
was
this
kind
of
wake-up
call
that
we
have
built
up
relationships
with
people
and
they
remember
us
for
holidays,
and
for
me
that
was
with
along
this
of
the
hatchery
outreach
moment
this
moment
of
devotion.
That
turnout
is
a
full
circle.
So
I'm
I'm
really
content
and
happy
with
this
and
yeah.
That's
it.
E
Thanks
so
much
well,
I
feel,
like
things
are
going
in
a
really
fast
pace,
but
it's
cool
because
like
well,
this
thing
of
the
boat
runoff
has
been
really
really
really
big,
but
at
the
same
time
it
will
be
closed
tomorrow
and
it's
just
the
start
of
a
new
framework
of
a
new
era
for
all
of
our
projects
and
for
the
tc.
E
So
it's
really
cool
and
at
the
same
time
yeah
I've
been
working
on
gravity,
and
today
I
posted
the
proposal
on
the
forum
like
for
advice,
process
and
yeah.
I
think
it
it
will
be
really
cool
like
finding
the
work
and
and
having
all
a
lot
of
people
like
wanting
to
contribute.
That's
really
really
cool
and
yeah.
That's
it
for
me.
I
will
pass
to
mert.
F
A
Yeah
yeah
I'd
say
I
mean
I'll
reiterate
the
the
you
know.
This
idea
of
collaborative
economics
is
really
about
having
an
informed
populace
so
not
about
you
know
anyone
being
able
to
to
define
the
best
parameters,
but
everyone
understanding
what
the
parameters
mean
and
I
think,
like
kudos
to
the
parameters
working
group
for
like
mission
accomplished
like
wonka's
like
even
I
could
do
it
and
I'm
like
I
know
wonka
even
I
could
do
it.
So
I
feel
like
that.
That's
a
huge
testament
to
like
okay.
A
Well,
anyone
in
the
community
actually
could
create
parameters
that
are,
you
know,
I
don't
know
whatever
they're
thinking
and
whatever
they're
learning
and
then
you
know
incorporate
that
learning
into
what
they're
doing.
So
I
I
think
that's
really
really
cool
and
then
I'd
say
yeah.
A
The
other
thing
is
you
know,
I've
been
thinking
about
our
cultural,
build
and
like
culture
comes,
and
it
goes
and
it's
easy
to
disappear,
and
I
I'm
going
to
propose
that
we
have
for
the
council
tomorrow
the
subject
of
like
what
is
the
importance
of
the
cultural
build
in
the
tec.
So
we
could
talk
about
that.
A
little
bit
later,
but
this
idea
of
like
practicing
the
you
know
practicing
the
culture
keeps
the
culture
alive
and
yeah.
I
think
that's
interesting.
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
that
this
past
week.
A
Actually,
so
maybe
that's
something
that
I'm
starting
to
wonder
about
before
we
launch
the
commons
like
do
we
do?
We
is
everyone
aligned
in
our
stewards
and
in
our
community
about
the
importance
of
the
tec
culture
and
do
we
like?
Maybe
we
want
to
reflect
on
how
important
it
is
or
how
important
it
isn't
together
and
I'll
pass
to
manu.
G
Thanks
sam
yeah,
well
for
me,
I've
reaching
out
to
hatchers
I've
been
working
on
the
concealers.
I
read
manifesto
along
with
mertz
working,
an
article
with
him
as
well.
Overall
temperature
check.
I
oh
man,
I
missed
it.
I
mean
the
last
500
because
I,
when
I
drink
it
with
a
friend
yesterday,
but
I
I'm
going
to
read
the
I'm
going
to
watch
the
repetition
and
overall
yeah,
I'm
just
excited
to
to
see
what
happens
after
comments
upgrade
and
and
see
see
the
attraction
that
we
get.
G
H
We
maneuver
around
with
that.
G
I
Thanks
jim
yeah,
I
I
love
what
everybody's
been
saying
about
collaborative
economics,
I'm
feeling
like
oh
man,
I'm
so
tired
of
presenting
goldie's.
It's
like.
I
Oh,
my
god,
like
for
real
another
person,
asked
me
why
the
entertainment's
too
fun
to
explode,
but
like
the
really
cool
thing,
is
that
so
many
people
have
good
questions,
and
so
many
people
like
because
of
this
like
iteration
and
the
repetition
like
so
many
people
are
really
coming
in,
and
it
was
crazy
how
great
that
the
last
debate
we
had
the
call
exploding
with
people
like
we
had
to
shut
our
videos
off.
So
it's
like
collaborative
economics.
I
think
this
like.
I
I
know
we
did
it
in
a
weird
way,
extending
the
vote
and
everyone
was
like.
Oh
maybe
we
should
have
done
it
better
and
done
a
little
more
advice
process,
but
I
think
that,
like
the
decision
to
do
so
has
like
really
shown
a
lot
of
value.
It's
like
we
have
more
people
who
care
more
people
who
know
what's
going
on
and
then
I've
even
like
been
convinced
by
almost
all
the
other.
Basically,
all
the
other
proposals
that
all
of
them
are
pretty
good,
and
so
it's
it's
really
cool.
I
I
think
that
this
has
been
like
such
a
good
thing
for
the
tz.
I'm
feeling
really
excited-
and
it's
also
really
nice
like
having
sem
here
and
sam
and
griff,
are
going
to
hang
out
and
work
on
the
commons
upgrade
stuff,
and
it's
just
really
nice
to
be
also
like
in
this.
In
the
heart
of
the
the
commons
upgrade
yeah
yeah.
I
guess
I
guess
that's
that's
my
general
temperature
check
all
the
things
that
can
be
pointed.
H
Yeah,
I
think
it's
going
to
depend
on
the
call
after
this
one,
which
is
the
reward
system,
but
in
general
I'm
feeling
super
excited
about
either
award
system
getting
the
quantifiers
going
and
b
the
commons
upgrade.
Of
course
I
was
hoping
for
a
more
confrontational
debate,
which
is
funny
I
was
just
like.
I
was
thinking
of
like
the
american
politics
and
like
biden
and
trump,
you
know
sort
of
thing,
but
you
know
maybe
we
maybe
we
dodged
a
bullet
or
not
one
but
yeah
anyway.
H
It's
all
of
it's
pretty
exciting
and
I'll
pass
it
to
todd.
J
Hey
everyone
I'm
just
listening.
I
joined
the
the
tec
discord
a
few
days
ago.
I've
been
a
supporter
of
the
common
stack
and
tc
and
kind
of
a
lot
of
the
the
related
network.
So
I'm
really
just
orienting
myself
and
and
trying
to
get
the
context
to
hopefully
start
to
participate
or
contribute
in
a
more
meaningful
way.
So
I'm
appreciative
of
all
of
you
and
I'm
excited
to
listen
in
today.
D
Thank
you.
We
didn't
have
orientation
call
this
week,
but
if
you
need
any
assistance,
you
can
send
me
a
dm
or
to
my
minor,
and
we
will
reach
you
out
back.
J
Okay,
thank
you
and
I'm
calling
in
from
colorado.
C
A
Appreciate
the
stewards
weekly,
maybe
I'll,
pass
this
up.
K
Thank
you,
tom
yeah,
I
mean
the
vibes
are
high.
I
am
also
agree
with
mitch.
I
really
would
love
more
confrontation.
I
think
that's
very
fun
and
I
think,
like
we
have
like
good
relations
between
each
other,
so
it
shouldn't
hurt
at
all
and
yeah.
I
mean
I'm
also
so
excited
like
about
the
those
two
other
boats
that
are
in
the
snapshot
and
I'm
a
little
bit.
Sad
like
one
is
like.
Oh
let
them
choose
like
they
are
trying
so
hard.
K
So
we
choose
what
to
do
and
then
in
one
boat
it's
like
depths,
and
I
mean-
and
this
is
my
second
option
in
one,
but
it's
because
I
want
the
reserve
ratio
to
be
the
best
and
then
this
is
my
second
option,
because
probably
the
devs
are
going
to
keep
the
reserve
ratio
the
same.
I
don't
know
if
that's
the
reasoning,
but
why
it's
so
high,
but
yeah
I
mean
yeah.
I'm
happy
yeah
back
to
your
thumb.
A
Okay
and
benz,
I
think
you
haven't
gotten
you're
the
only
one
who
hasn't
gone
yet,
if
you
want
to
just
do.
L
Yeah,
no,
I'm
really
excited
about
the
launch
the
whole
all
the
parameter.
Debates
has
gone
really.
Well,
I'm
excited
about
like
how
participatory
it's
been,
and
you
know
I
think,
self-governance.
That's
the
key
is
like
broad
participation,
so
I'm
excited
about
where
this
is
going
and
just
yeah.
A
Cool
thanks
for
that
all
right,
so
the
first
thing
on
our
agenda
is
to
introduce
a
new
joint
initiative
between
the
token
engineering,
commons
and
token
engineering
academy.
A
lot
of
praise
goes
to
ms
really
for
for
coordinating
on
this,
but
it
looks
like
the
token
engineering
academy.
Monthly
introduction
to
engineering
is
now
going
to
be
co-hosted
by
the
token
engineering
commons.
A
So
we
had
a
call
about
it
last
week
and
edu
of
course,
and
what
we
will
be
doing
is
presenting
about
20
minutes
of
the
call,
the
token
engineering
commons
and
then
being
around
to
answer
questions.
So
I
thought
it'd
be
nice
for
the
stewards
somebody
to
volunteer
for
who
would
like
to
start
doing
that,
and
maybe
we
could
have
sort
of
rotate
in.
We
could
have
one
steward
every
month.
Do
the
presentation
and
be
available
to
answer
questions.
A
So
it's
going
to
be
next
week
january
19th
at
4
pm
cet,
and
I
guess
it's
open
if
you
want
to
present,
maybe
just
throw
your
name
on
on
here.
I
have
a
a
tec
introduction
that
I
did
a
number
of
months
ago.
We
could
use
that
as
a
base
and
build
upon
it
so
that
anyone
can
just
grab
the
deck
and
present
the
tec
to
the
token
engineering
community
every
month.
So
looking
for
volunteers
who
wants
to
do
it,
so
please
throw
your
name
up.
A
If
you
want
to
do
it
and
then
the
other
thing
is
like
participation,
it's
open,
like
it'd,
be
great.
If
more
stewards
show
up
and
more
people,
we
invite
more
people
from
the
token
engineering
community.
So
an
introduction
to
token
engineering
is
a
great
way
to
learn
about
both
token
engineering
and
academy
and
took
an
engineering
comments
at
the
same
time
and
then
promotion
chewie.
I
dropped
this
in
the
discord
thread.
A
A
K
Yeah
I
mean
I'm
totally
done
and
presentation
maybe
like
after
many
people
do
it
before
me.
Then
I
can't
just
learn
a
bit
I
wouldn't
mind,
but
for
the
beginning,
just
participating
seems
fine.
A
Cool
okay!
If
nobody
signs
up
on
this
call
I'll
keep
checking
with
people
and
seeing
if
there's
somebody
who
wants
to
present
it's
only
a
short
20
minutes.
A
Great
wonka
awesome
I'll
I'll
share
with
you,
the
the
deck
for
the
introduction,
and
maybe
we
can.
You
can
have
a
look
and
see
how
you
want
to
customize
it.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Can
I
just
say
what
the
f
they're.
Finally
here,
I
feel
like
after
so
long
we're.
Finally
here
and
it's
very,
very,
very
cool,
so
maybe
we
just
take
a
moment
to
okay.
Maybe
we
don't
celebrate
quite
yet.
A
One
thing
I
do
want
to
say
is
that
we
did
offer
sem
to
have
a
sort
of
celebration
for
his
exiting
the
stewards
and
he
and
I
informally
agree
that
actually
we're
going
to
celebrate
in
barcelona
and
he
only
wants
to
celebrate
after
the
commons
upgrade
is
officially
done
so
hey
sam
nice
to
see
you
we're
we're
trying
to
figure
out
where
we're
going
to
celebrate
after
the
commons
upgrade.
We
think
barcelona.
E
M
Nothing
for
now,
but
I
will
tell
you
if
I
need
something
we
will
be
now
arranging
the
parameters,
thinking
that
nobody
rage
quits.
O
M
It
yeah
okay,
so
yeah.
We
are
here
with
that
and
what
are
you
doing
right
now
doing
creating
a
new
hatch
dao,
a
kind
of
highlights?
Now
it's
not
a
really
a
real
hex
though,
but
it
is
going
to
mock
the
amount
of
tcs
that
are
going
to
be
migrated
and
pchs
that
are
going
to
be
migrated
and
test
the
migration.
So
the
guardian
receives
the
the
tokens
means
the
new
tokens
and.
P
All
of
this,
how
many
test
hashtags
do
you
think
you've
deployed
at
this
point
many
many
dozen
a
dozen
at
least
okay,
sorry.
A
A
Cool,
so
you
know
the
question
came
up
around
ranked
choice
voting
and
I,
and
it
made
me-
raise
also
another
flag.
So
the
I
mean
not
another
another
question,
so
we
have
the
rank
choice
voting
here,
which
shows
the
top
two
and
then
in
another
one.
It
shows
the
top
three
and
I
was
wondering,
does
anybody
know.
B
Yeah,
I'm
so
excited
so
I
I
never
hit
send
on
this,
but
I
guess
I
should,
but
basically
it's
because
it
rank
choice.
Voting
stops
when
one
result
wins
50
a
vote.
Okay,
so
it
eliminates
the
the
fewest
number
of
first
place
votes
until
the
you
know.
Top
voted
proposal
has
over
50
and
then
it
stops.
So
if
it's
a
really
tight
race,
it'll
just
be
two,
and
if
it's
like
you
know,
one
has
a
large
majority,
then
actually
it
ends
up
being
three
or
even
even
four.
B
Like
if,
let's
say
that
over
50
percent
chose,
this
chose
number
option
number
one
as
their
first
choice,
then
you
just
see
the
first
place
votes.
None
of
the
options
would
have
zero
percent
unless
of
course,
no
one
voted
for
them,
but
does
that
make
sense
not
quite.
K
One
proposal
reached
like
more
than
50
percent,
then
there's
no
range
of
spotting,
like
it
just
show,
wherever
people
voted
and
since
there's
55
that
that
surpasses
then
yeah
there's
no
elimination.
But
then,
if
there's
some
proposals
without
this
50,
then
it
starts
to
eliminate
until
reaching
like
50
percent.
B
Maybe
the
missing
piece
is
that
that
little
box
on
the
side
is
showing
if
the
results
stop,
if
no
one
else
voted
right
now,
this
would
be
the
final
result.
It's
not
showing
the
current
results.
It's
showing
what
the
final
result
would
be
if
no
one
else
voted
and
the
way
the
final
result
is
calculated.
B
Is
that
it's
like,
if
one
person,
if
one
choice,
has
over
50
of
the
vote
report
results
else
eliminate
one.
The
fewest
number
of
first
place
votes
the
the
the
choice
that
has
the
fewest
number
of
first
place
votes,
and
so
then
they
eliminate
the
fewest
number
first
place
votes
and
that
choice
from
the
option
and
everyone
who
put
that
as
their
first
place
vote
gets
their
second
place
vote
is
their
first
place
vote,
and
so
then
it
does
the
math
again
does
any?
D
D
If
I
can
take
my
vote
out,
I
don't
there
is
no
description
for
me
to
say
what
kind
of
what
is
frank's
choice,
voting
and
so
on.
So
I
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
clarify
when
we
make
another
proposal.
What
does
that
imply?
What
does
that
kind
of
voting
implies
for
the
voter,
and
this
one
is
a
very
key.
D
You
know
votation
both
and
we
didn't
clarify
that,
and
people
were
confused
a
little
bit
about
that.
Just.
C
A
C
I
ca.
I
can
give
an
explanation
of
how
it
made
sense
to
me,
because
I
was
also
confused
about
it.
So
the
way
it
works
is
that
if
a
vote
reaches
more
than
50
than
50
percent,
like
like
it
happened
with
this
one
that
you're
showing
and
with
that
other
one
that
was
55,
then
ranked
choice
voting
doesn't
even
operate.
D
The
conflict
here
with
this
visualization
is
that
if
we
don't
clarify,
people
can
assume
that
no
one
has
both
for
the
other
three.
Therefore,
it
could
be
ambiguously
giving
favoritism
to
the
top
two
you
know
like
if
I
go
to
an
election.
D
Sorry,
if
I
go
to
an
election
and
I
see
five
options,
but
then
I
see
my
one
has
no
votes.
I
won't
vote
for
it
because
I
feel
the
social
pressure
of
oh,
it's
meaningless.
If
I
vote
for
this
one,
but
these
kind
of
things
I
think,
are
worth
clarifying
down
the
road.
No,
no
for
not
for
this
one.
It's
for
the
next
ones,.
K
A
Yeah,
okay,
cool
yeah.
I
I
also
think
that
it
looks
like
nobody's
voted
for
the
other
ones
and
it
is
misleading
and
I
and
I
don't
think
that's
necessarily
bad
just
that
it's
very
difficult
for
people
to
understand
that
who
haven't?
We
don't
know
you
know.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
it's
worth
doing
a
a
special
forum
post
on
ranked
choice,
voting
like
some
of
the
or
some
sort
of
information
where
we
can
help
educate
the
people
who
are
using
in
our
community
who
are
using
ranked
choice.
Voting
on
how
it
works.
C
B
B
B
Noon
tomorrow,
no
noon
tomorrow.
Okay,
the
vote
ends
the
sorry
costa
rica
time.
Yes,
the
vote
ends
at
the
vote.
Ends
at
8
00
a.m,
our
time,
and
so
it
should
take.
I
mean
I
hope
it's
up
before
noon.
It
could
be
up
as
soon
as
90
minutes
it.
B
Yeah,
maybe
yeah,
let
me
I
don't
want
to
do.
Let's
see,
see
we'll
just
say
assuming
worst
case.
A
So
the
rage
quit
time
is
for
people
who
disagree
with
the
parameters.
They
have
a
certain
amount
of
time
to
exit
before
the
parameter
before
we
go
live
with
the
commons
upgrade
yes,
and
once
that
period
ends,
then
we
can
go,
live
with
the
commons
upgrade
and
conviction.
Voting
will
start
so
that
we
can
go
to
transfer
funds
to
the
bonding
curve,
and
then
that
vote
happens
and
then
the
bonding
curve
goes
live.
Is
that
the
correct
sequence.
B
Yep
exactly
so
it'll
take
six
days,
because
we
have
a
four-day
vote,
duration
and
a
two-day
rage
quit
period
for
for
the
conviction,
voting
to
open,
and
then
we
will
have
the
abc
configuration
by
then
sorted.
So
we
can
like
right
away
launch
the
abc
vote
at
the
same
time
that
conviction
voting
starts
basically
and
and
then
we
have
the
final
timeline,
but
I
it's
hard
to
say
when
it
will
be.
B
It
could
be
like
the
we'll
know,
we'll
know
tomorrow
how
long
after
conviction
voting
starts
till
the
abc
is
open.
A
Okay,
the
reward
board
gets
their
funding
and
so
does
laser
tag.
B
B
B
G
B
K
Question
regarding
the
vote
and
it's,
for
example,
like
okay
call
the
locks
win,
but
if
not
my
first
option
I,
and
neither
the
second
and
then
should
I
vote
on
the
hatch.
Now
that
I
want
goldilocks
to
be
the
proposal.
Should
I
vote
no
like
it's
it's
weird
right.
B
B
Would
I
would
argue,
your
options
are
probably
more
like
rage
quit
or
vo?
No,
but
if
you're
going
to
rage
quit,
you
could
vote
no
and
try
to
make
try
to
make
it
an
argument
to
the
community.
You
know.
K
Q
B
A
Yeah,
but
you
bring
up
a
good
point
of
optimism,
it's
something
to
consider
for
future
commons,
actually,
the
sort
of
like
opening
for
a
filibuster,
but
for
like
a
accordion,
not.
A
A
Okay,
one
thing
that
came
up
in
one
of
the
debates
not
debate
fireside
chats
was
the
idea
of
chewie's,
not
here
darn.
A
It
was
the
idea
of
using
the
covenant
to
to
challenge
a
proposal
to
the
conviction,
voting
to
conviction
voting
and
the
idea,
and
even
I
sort
of
had
this
idea-
was
that
if
there
is
a,
you
know
an
actor
with
bad
intent,
then,
and
who
submits
a
proposal
and
like
I
don't
know,
I
don't
even
know
what
examples
there
are,
but
I
use
the
exam
example.
A
We
sort
of
thought
that
we
could
always
rely
on
celeste,
but
I
think
what
metaverde
pointed
out
coming
from
one
hive
was
that
celeste
can
only
say
whether
or
not
they've
abided
by
the
terms
of
our
covenant
and
our
covenant
doesn't
actually
say
anything
about
sneaking
proposals
through
common
the
conviction
voting.
So
we
probably
can't
rely
on
that
to
prevent
proposals
from
going
through
in
a
way
that
is
not
necessarily
honest,
but
we
should.
We
will
probably
want
to
go
back
and
maybe
update
our
covenant
for
that
purpose.
C
I
have
a
one
one
comment
to
that:
I
I
agree
that
there
are
probably
many
blind
spots
in
the
covenant
that
will
come
up
and
we
could
like
put
them
on
a
list
and
gather
a
few
for
for
the
next
process
and
iteration,
but
also
we
left
it
open
enough.
C
So
there
is
a
flat
like
a
subjective
flexibility
in
it.
So
I
think
people
could
consider
this
like
bribing
against
our
mission
or
people
could
consider
bribing
something
that
is
not
safe
for
the
community
or
something
that
is
not
inclusive
or
that
is
insulting
or
you
know.
So.
I
think
there
are
a
few
points
in
the
covenant
that
could
stop,
that
that
could
justify
what
is
written
to
stop
something
like
this,
but
I
think
it's
good
to
yeah
just
keep
all
of
them
written.
A
A
Yeah,
it's
pretty
unlikely
for
us
to
need
it
too,
but
okay,
cool
yeah
that
took
me
by
surprise
actually,
because
it
I
hadn't
thought
that
through
and
then
that
made
sense
when
that
was
shared.
Q
Hello,
I
have
a
question
or
comment.
I'm
actually
just
here.
That's
an
observer.
I've
been
as
an
observer
most
of
the
communities
reunions
that
you
guys
have
been
having
and
fairly
new
to
the
to
the
to
all
the
token
engineering's
community,
but
yeah.
Q
I
I'm
really
interested
in
what
you
mentioned
about
about
boating
manipulation
and
all
of
those
things
that
are
natural
to
happen
in
systems
like
like
this
and
and
I
I
am
very
interested
in
like
analyzing
or
or
like
working
in
ways
of
of
finding
out
if
things
like
that
are
happening,
and
I
I
have
a
lot
of
experience
with
with
things
related
to
that
in
terms
of
simulation
and
and
and
math
analysis
to
to,
I
don't
know
to
to
have
a
some
insight
of
some
type
if
things
like
that
are
happening
in
systems
like
this,
but
I'm
just
wondering
like
where
who
are
the
people
in
charge
of
this
or
or
who?
A
I
mean,
I
think
libya
is
the
best
one
of
the
best
people
to
talk
to
she's
the
working
group
steward
for
soft
gov,
but
also
as
part
of
governance,
which
is
more
of
a
group
of
researchers
from
many
different
dows
who
are
studying
governance
in
endow
space
olivia.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
share
anything
or
pull
anyone
else
into
the
discussion.
C
I
was,
I
was
just
thinking
that
that
could
be
something
interesting
to
have
like
someone
thinking
of
possible
attacks
constantly
to
just
like
keep
the
community
more
resilient
yeah.
We
we
can
chat.
Gustavo,
I
imagine,
is
your
name.
Q
Yes,
gustavo,
I'm
from
mexico
yeah
I'd
definitely
be
interested
in
having
a
chat
and
helping
in
that
way
like
that,
I'm
really
excited
about
that.
A
Q
A
Awesome
welcome
he's
one
of
he's
bringing
so
many
people
in
all
right
cool,
so
I
have
a
suggestion
for
a
subject
for
tomorrow's
council.
By
the
way,
I
think
seven
people
voted.
So
thank
you.
I
think
that's
enough
for
us
to
change
the
council
to
7
p.m,
and
the
subject
is
the
importance
of
the
cultural
build
in
the
tec.
A
So
just
a
heads
up,
I
think
we
should
invite
more
in
the
community
actually
so
just
sort
of
maybe
post
on
discord
to
invite
other
people
to
join
as
well,
especially
people
that
feel
strongly
about
the
cultural
build
and
the
tdc
and
we'll
figure
out
how
to
structure
that
conversation.
A
But
the
idea
is
maybe
to
reflect
on
what
our
cultural
build
is
and
then
to
share
our
ideas
about
the
importance
of
it
of
culture
and
the
ports
of
culture
and
the
tec,
and
and
sort
of
see
what
we
come
up
with
out
of
that
discussion.
A
So
thanks
for
the
changing
the
date,
I
thought
we
can't
do
this
one
without
livia.
So
I
asked
if
we
could
change
the
date.
A
Cool
okay,
we
have
15
minutes,
left
cv
proposal,
requests
coming
so,
okay,
so
chewy.
You
have
two
things
that
you
want
to
share
the
the
dwork
platform
and
the
cv
proposals.
A
A
So
I
think
that
the
stewards
from
those
two
working
groups
could
so-
I
guess,
that's
huge-
can
sort
of
put
together
a
sort
of
retiring
ceremony
celebration
and,
like
I
don't
know
if
we
want
the
mission
accomplished
banner
on
the
back
of
our
ship,
but
like
mission
accomplished
in
a
big
way,
so
probably
in
the
coming
weeks
after
the
commons
upgrade
is
all
done.
We
can
sort
of
have
a
nice
celebration
for
the
efforts,
the
tremendous
efforts
these
two
groups
had.
So
I
just
want
to
put
that
on
everyone's
radar.
B
Yeah
and
I'll,
I
think
just
toss
it
to
me
and
I'll
look
at
it
and
we'll
see
exactly.
I
mean
I'm
expecting
that
we
can
do
this,
like
maybe
in
a
week
or
two.
A
Cool
yeah,
I
think
after
the
everything
is
done
and
you
guys
can
really
focus
like
you
know:
you're,
not
yeah.
We
don't
want
to.
We
don't
take
any
focus
away.
B
I
have,
can
I
just
interject,
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
it's
on
the
agenda,
but
I
think
it's
just
worth
mentioning.
Is
that
okay
or
I
can
wait
too?
It
should
be
quick.
I
since
I
have
the
floor,
I'm
taking
it.
I'm
posting
in
the
stewart's
channel,
just
the
stewart's
channel
the
twitter
for
the
t
commons,
because
chewie
just
put
out
five
tweets
that
are
interesting
and
it's
kind
of
like
a
voting
on
twitter
thing.
B
So
it's
like
retweet
and
comment
why
you
are
voting
for
each
proposal
and
it's
a
really
fun
program,
but
it
will
only
work
if
we
get
some
retweets.
So
if
you're
willing
to
publicly
disclaim,
why
you
are
you
know
supporting
each
proposal.
Please
please
take
a
moment
to
do
that.
So
we
can
really
get
the
word
out
and
and
inform
our
voters.
B
A
Cool
thanks
for
sharing
that
and
yeah.
It's
a
good
point.
I
can't
wait
to
see
them.
I
haven't
seen.
I
haven't
seen
them
yet.
Okay,
the
next
thing
is
mert.
I
don't
know
if
you've
accepted
this,
but
to
sort
of
be
the
ygg
jumped
on
to
the
communitas
call
yesterday
to
ask
to
have
more
links
and
a
liaison
from
the
tec
in
prime
down-
and
I
believe,
mert's
name
came
up-
is
like
he'd
be
great,
so
I
guess
I'm
putting
you
on
the
spot.
A
A
So
we
have
a
lot
of
overlap
and
over
line
in
our
interest
and
then
a
lot
of
the
research
that
we're
doing
so
take
a
minute
to
hop
into
the
forum
mitch
already
did
and
to
maybe
we
should
consider
this
even
outside
as
how
the
tec
can
participate
in
this
proposal,
inverter,
probably
as
owners
payers
and
brokers.
Actually.
A
So
maybe
this
is
a
subject
for
another
time,
but
I
wanted,
because
only
because
we
have
more
things
on
our
agenda,
but
I
wanted
to
give
merch
just
a
chance
to
say
hello
and
maybe
share
your
expectations
as
the
liaison
one
of
the
liaisons.
F
Hello
thanks
for
like
recommending
me,
I'm
I'm
super
honored.
F
Basically,
what
prime
like
I
did
a
call
with
atta
and
alp
they're,
all
saying
hi
to
all
of
you
guys.
Basically,
they
want
to
work
with
tc,
especially
in
the
ecosystem
creation
part,
since
it's
a
call
liquidity
funding
tool.
It
needs
some
ecosystem
to
be
engaged.
F
So
since
prime
doesn't
have
manpower
to
do
it,
they
want
tc
to
own
the
tool
together
and
for
prime
will
do
the
development
with
long
tail
and
tec
will
support
it
in
the
ecosystem
creation
part,
and
what
they
want
me
to
do.
Is
that
create
this
operation,
like
as
a
liaison
like
breach
those
two
communities
and
ensure
the
alliance?
A
D
And
I
could
suggest
merc
that
we
could
sync
or
you
can
join
any
community,
that's
working
through
call,
so
you
can
like
start
drafting
or
start
understanding
our
process.
Whatever
you
want
to
know,
we
are
here.
A
N
C
Okay,
so
I'm
sorry
just
quick
comment
about
the
tweet.
I
don't
do
you
know
if
it
was
chewy
that
put
it
out
because
mathematics
isn't
there.
G
C
Q
I
B
A
Okay,
cool,
so
I'm
realizing
chewie
isn't
wasn't
able
to
join
us
today.
So
zep
you
wanted
to
raise
credentials
management.
K
Yeah
I
mean
we
did.
We
did
a
quick
boat
signaling
on
either
if
we
just
when
someone
is
blocking
giving
credentials
to
a
contributor.
If,
like
people
dm
me
and
then
I
post
the
result
there
or
we
just
keep
it,
I
mean
the
chat,
I
don't
feel
it's
a
public
chat.
K
E
K
My
opinion
is
like,
like
I,
in
my
opinion,
it's
okay
like
to
you
know
like
it's
just
40
40
of
us
like
we
are
a
group
of
friends
and,
in
my
opinion
like,
if
we
just
put
our
opinions
there,
it
shouldn't
be
bad
and
actually
it's
it's
helpful
actually
to
keep
more
accountable
and
not
relying
in
one
person
or
two
but
yeah
like
I.
A
So
let
me
take
a
crack
at
framing
the
question.
The
the
question
was
how
we
are
currently
giving
access
to
different
platforms
to
community
members.
Is
we
put
a
poll
on
the
stewards
telegram
asking?
Should
we
give
them
access
or
not,
and
it
is
anonymous.
O
A
O
K
Actually,
actually
until
now,
if
one
person
voted
no,
it
was
the
vote
was
blocked,
but
we
didn't
frame
what
happened
next
and
then
actually
right
now
we're
framing
what
happened
next
and
then
yeah
we're
having
some
discrepancy
on
yeah
how
to
proceed
and
maybe
like
we
could
yeah
like
the
people
who's
here,
like
we
say
or
or
either
we're
both
on
the
pole.
But
I
mean
we
need
more
people
to
vote
like
it's
only
five
people,
actually,
I
don't
feel
comfortable
pushing,
especially
when
it's
like
even.
A
Yeah,
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
I
have
a
feeling
this
isn't
something
we
could
do
quickly
in
five
minutes
and
maybe
there's
like
a
small
group
of
people
who
get
together
and
have
their
proposal
for
how
to
do
this.
After,
like
taking
different
perspectives
like
doing
advice,
process
getting
a
bunch
of
perspectives
and
then
just
writing
down
the
way
to
do
access
management
to
different
platforms
rather
than
this
is
a
call.
K
A
A
A
Yeah,
I
would
say
the
like
yeah
yeah,
okay,
because
we
have
four
minutes
left,
so
I
just
don't
think
we're
going
to
be
able
to
vote
on
this
to
everyone's
satisfaction,
so
wonka,
I'm
sorry
that
leaves
you
with
four
minutes
for
the
road
map.
E
Yeah,
this
is
something
that
I
have
been
working
on
with
durga
and
I
think
it's
really
cool
and
it's
it
makes
three
phases
for
the
development
of
gravity
and
phase
three
is
starting
in
in
next
year.
In
2023
and
phase
one
and
phase
two
will
be
for
2022..
This
phase
three
is
for
2023
and
phase.
One
and
phase
two
is
for
2022.,
and
we
we
have
here
like
our
orientation
purposes
and
phase
one
is
like
downward
strapping
continuation
of
activities.
E
Then
we
in
phase
two.
We
want
to
transition
to
service
down
and
maybe
in
phase
three
like
self
running
service
down.
This
is
a
draft,
but
it's
like
how
we
see
ourselves,
maybe
in
a
year
and
yeah
like
here,
we
want
to
continue
having
orienting
principles
for
dao's.
E
Maybe
then,
in
phase
two
having
marketing
for
groups
and
like
one
of
the
cool
things
that
that
I
am
and-
and
I
we're
talking
about-
is
like
in
phase
three-
maybe
for
next
year-
it
would
be
really
cool
to
iterate
on
the
tc
framework
and
maybe
design
a
gravity
token
and
and
iterate
on
all
these,
like
applying
a
bonding
curve
and
having
like
a
common
spool
to
fund
instead
of
the
e-related
projects
like
projects
related
to
trust
creation
and
conflict
management.
E
So
yeah.
This
is
like
the
way
we
are
going
to.
We
like
design,
really
fastly
a
road
map
for
for
a
year
of
operations
of
gravity,
and
this
first
year
we
will
have
two
proposals
to
the
tc,
but
we
will
still
have
on
a
really
good
focus
on
getting
new
funds
and
and
funding
streams,
and
also
to
continue
fostering
our
activities
and
the
services
for
conflict
management.
A
Thanks
for
sharing
that
this
looks
great
organized,
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
add
anything.
A
Okay,
I'm
not
even
sure
durgados.
If
you
can
hear
you
yeah,
I
see
you
are
speaking,
but
no
sound
is
coming
through.
A
A
E
Yeah,
I
know
that
I
I
think,
what
that
what
we're
doing
in
the
tc
is
really
cool
and
that
I
think
this
can
be
a
project
that
can
iterate
on
on
the
things
that
we're
doing
and
also
maybe
for
next
year.
We
can
have
like,
like
our
own
gravity,
praise
our
own
source.
Great,
maybe
yeah,
like
even
our
own
token,
and
this
is
something
that
was
born
from
the
dc.
E
But
this
is
also
showing
how
we
can
we
want
to
be
sustainable
and
also
become
independent
from
the
dc
in
in
in
the
future.
A
Thanks
a
lot
for
sharing
that
and
it's
in
the
stewards
agenda.
If
anyone
wants
to
jump
up,
jump
in,
we
are
at
out
of
time,
hi
chewie
and
we
didn't
get
the
chance
to
go
through
chewie's
two
agenda
items
and
we'll
push
it
to
next
week,
and
maybe
even
d-work
will
have
more
stuff
in
it,
so
that
the
demo
will
be
even
cooler
thanks.
Everyone
for
your
time,
we're
at
the
top
of
the
hour.