►
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tam
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
What's
going
on
in
our
community
and
I
guess
we'll
get
started
by
temperature
check
and
I'll
ask
nate
to
kick
us
off.
B
Thanks
tim
temperature
check
is
good.
You
know
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
motion
towards
creating
doubts
from
from
the
working
groups,
which
is
really
cool
outside
of
that.
I
don't
really
have
much
to
add,
and
I
think
it's
been
pretty
pretty
solid
this
week
so
I'll
pass
it
to
wonka.
C
Thanks
nate
well,
I
feel
that
it's
very
important
that
we
are
taking
like
our
first
decisions
as
a
dao
and
that's
very
interesting
and
also
the
thing
that
I
have
been
thinking
is
that
it's
really
cool
that
we
encourage
people
that
work
a
lot
to
also
take
vacations,
because
I
was
thinking
in
libya
and
I
really
hope
that
she
like
had
a
good
time
off
from
the
organization
because,
like
we
all
need
it
sometimes
in
a
while
and
now
that
I
am
looking
into
other
organizations,
it's
not
so
much
so
much
normal
and
we
have
normalized
it.
C
So
I
think,
like
that's
a
good
practice,
that
we
can
talk
about
and
share
with
other
organizations
and
besides
that
yeah
I
have
been
working
on
the
on
the
ground
training
and
I
will
be
back
in
colombia
next
week.
So
yeah,
I'm
happy
to
have
lived
this
experience
in
here
in
europe,
but
I
am
also
ready
to
go.
Go
back
to
my
house
and
I
will
pass
to
tam.
A
Cool
I'll
say
it's,
you
know
from
a
personal
perspective,
it's
a
very
challenging
week
for
me,
so
I
feel
like
I'm
just
barely
keeping
everything
together.
So
that's
the
truth,
but
school
starts
on
friday
and
things
will
change
dramatically
after
that,
and
so
I
feel
a
little.
I
don't
know
like
just
feel
like.
A
I
don't
have
my
put
my
fingers
on
the
pulse
of
anything
right
now,
but
overall
you
know
I
did
a
zen
hub
onboarding
today
for
the
tec
and
the
people
I
expected
to
show
up
and
then
a
bunch
of
other
people
showed
up
and
it
was
really
nice
and
it's
just.
I
guess.
A
The
thing
I
keep
coming
back
to
is
like
this
idea
that
a
successful
dao
is
a
dao
where
you
actually
have
a
community
and
the
community's
active
and
new
people
keep
coming,
and
so
it
seems
like,
if
that's
the
criteria
that
I'm
using
to
measure
success
right
now.
It's
we're
really
successful.
D
Well,
all
I
can
say
is
I
want
to
thank
everyone
who
took
care
of
legal
while
I
was
away
levy
and
you
tom
and
and
of
course,
sean
I've
been
catching
up
a
little
bit,
and
hopefully
this
week,
I'll
I'll
be
I'll,
be
just
joining
the
meeting,
and
all
I
can
say
is
that
I'm
just
anxious
to
see
how
we
progress,
how
the
params
are
are
doing
and
how
we
are
moving
forward
with
the
new
dashboard
and
how
we
start
discussions
with
with
the
new
the
new
final
tao
and
how
everything
about.
E
Thanks
auntie
yeah,
I
I
leave
some
stuff
on
legal.
Like
sean
is
reviewing
the
code
of
conduct
for
platform,
admins
yeah.
You
could
take
a
look
at
that.
That
would
be
awesome
and
for
temperature
check.
I
think
it's
going
awesome
like
there
is
a
lot
of
debates
and
it's
it's
coming
slowly,
but
I
I
feel,
like
the
forum
is
being
more
active
than
ever.
So
that's
super
cool
and
yeah.
That's
my
that's!
My
temperature
check
I'll
pass
it
to
katie.
F
I
I'm
I
was
having
some
mic
trouble
today,
so
hopefully
you
can
hear
me
yeah,
I'm
it's
going
well
for
me.
I'm
feeling
some
a
lot
of
movement
actually
on
developing
a
team
for
this
orientation,
slash
community
building
working
group,
so
that's
been
been
great
and
actually
tam.
I
I
posted
in
orientation
that
about
your
zen
hub
onboarding
and
I
I
realized
I
probably
should
have
posted
it
sooner,
but
hopefully
that
had
sent
a
couple
of
people
your
way,
because
that
is
definitely
something
that
is
part
of
what
everybody
needs.
F
So
those
have
been
really
amazing
yeah.
So
I'm
reconnecting
to
the
pulse
after
the
summer,
and
you
know
it's
kind
of
getting
cold
all
right
did
you
go
griff
or
I
don't
think
so.
Chris.
G
Cold
is
right
and
it
must
be
global,
cooling
or
something
sounds
like
it's
cold
all
over
the
world.
All
right,
but
yeah
temperature
check
is
good.
I
mean
you
know.
The
pram
stuff
is
just
so
exciting,
like
the
the
brazilian
ninjas
are
just
killing
it
slaughtering
it.
They're
they're
together
right
now,
hacking
on
on
on
getting
the
conviction,
voting
demo
out,
so
getting
lots
getting
yeah.
It's
just
things
are
moving
so
well
in
on
that
side
seems
like
the
community
is
bustling.
G
You
know
I
mean
we're
we're
at
this
conference
at
the
ccg
and
it's
like
common
stack's,
the
highlight
you
know
every
the
ins
and
the
tec
is
we're
the
highlight,
so
it
feels
really
good
and
just
getting
so
much
positive
feedback
about
about
this.
So
I
actually
thought
it
would
be
a
little
bit
more
difficult
in
this
in
between
time
with
the
dao.
So
I'm
pleasantly
surprised
that
there
isn't
like
that.
You
know
people
see
the
progress
is
happening
and
they're.
G
Not
so
like
hey,
there's
money
just
sitting
here
like
so
that's
really
good.
I
was
really
worried
that
there
would
be
like
a
a
need
for
momentum,
but
honestly
everyone
just
put
their
money
in
and
and
the
people
who
are
busy
are
being
busy
and
the
people
who
who
are
excited
are
just
getting
more
and
more
excited.
So
it's,
I
would
say
it's
really
positive.
G
On
the
external
side,
yeah
I
mean
the
only
challenges
is
common
swarm
trying
to
hold
it
together
over
there
the
things
are
being
held
together,
making
deals
and
and
and
figuring
out,
the
details
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
complete.
Everything
will
be
complete
still
having
a
challenge
over
the
bonding
curve
stuff,
but
hopefully
I
can
appeal
to
authorities
and
we'll
we'll
sort
it
out
I'll
pass
it
to.
Am
I
last
no
deceptivist.
H
I
It's
these
these
days
remind
me
a
lot
of
the
pre-hatched
days,
everybody's
starting
to
freak
out
and
there's
a
lot
going
on
in
params
and
there's
a
lot
of
going
on
in
the
forum
and
advice
process
is
on
fire
and
then
everybody's
like
asking
again
like,
like
what's
gonna
happen
like
after
this
stage,
but
but
I'm
I'm
really
happy,
because
it's
not
our
first
rodeo
and
and
I
feel
that
we're
gonna
do
pretty
pretty
good
at
at
this
stage.
I
Before
the
comments
upgrade
and
and
yeah
like
like
in
retrospective,
I
feel
that
the
hatch
was
like
a
warm-up
for
everything,
that's
gonna
happen
and
and
yeah
I'm
I'm
very
excited,
I'm
just
very
excited
for
everything
that
that
is
gonna
be
evolving
in
the
next
few
weeks.
And
yes,
I'm
also
excited
to
share
some
ideas
for
the
calm
down
today.
So
I
think
I
think
70
went
already
so
I'll
pass
it
back
to
tam.
A
Cool
excellent:
there
was
an
open
question
about
how
we
could
communicate
or
how
some
wanted
to
communicate
about
dev
position,
the
aragon
dev
position.
Do
we
have
any
resolution
on
how
we
can
communicate
it
yet
or
whether
we
should
or
what
any
guidance.
A
G
Yeah
I
mean
I
did
talk
to
some
about
like
how
much
paulo
can
be
involved
still
and
like
what
the
lines
are
there
and
and
all
of
that
I
mean
I'm,
I'm
asking
around
looking
for
a
like
a
common
stack,
specifically
a
common
stack
dev
to
to,
but
I
have
a
call
with.
I
have
a
call
with
brett
tomorrow,
but
I
don't
think
it's
likely,
but
at
least
he
could
point
me
in
the
right
direction
too
and
then
yeah,
I
don't
know
I
I
I
don't.
G
G
D
G
G
No,
that
that's
definitely
my
actually.
I
was
going
to
go
to
hal's
house
on,
like
the
11th
or
something
around
then
that
weekend,
because
pow
pow
leads
folk,
downey
and
they're.
The
lead
devs
for
aragon,
they're,
the
only
aragon,
dev.
J
G
Right
now,
so
totally,
if
you're,
if
you're
chatting
up
with
farron,
definitely
definitely
float
that
idea
his
way
that'd
be
awesome.
Okay,
okay,.
D
B
Gonna
be
presenting
being
paid
to
learn,
but
not
not
sure
if
natalya
or
angela
or
dan
danferella
d'angelo
can't
pronounce
the
name
we'll
present.
So
I
will
confirm
that
today.
A
A
All
right,
I
everyone
knows
already,
but
just
to
reiterate-
that
there
are
proposals
and
advice
process
on
the
forum
wanting
to
just
check
where
we
are
with
them.
Maybe
as
all
of
us
together,
I
think
the
status
of
the
75
percent
of
the
governance
was.
We
will
wait
as
of
last
night,
we'll
wait
to
hear
back
for
technical
solutions.
C
Yeah
and
also
yesterday,
I
talked
with
sam
and
he
said
to
me
that
he
was
thinking
on
a
third
option
so
that.
C
G
Talked
to
some
about
that
last
night,
I'm
not
the
biggest
fan.
C
Okay
but
yeah
that
we
are
looking
for
the
best
ways
to
do
it,
not
only
the
ones
that
are
posted,
but
like
continuing
in
research
and
yeah,
because
we
see,
I
see
that
the
pro
the
problem
is
not
like.
The
75
percent
governance
back
is
more
like.
How
are
we
going
to
implement
it,
and
the
boat
has
like
these
two
aspects
and
I
think,
like
the
boat,
still
needs
a
little
bit
of
time.
A
A
Okay
for
accommodating
the
lost
addresses,
zeptimus
posted
it
on
snapshot
already.
Is
that
you
want
to
give
a
quick
update
on
that.
E
Yeah,
I
also
was
talking
with
ivy
and
she
sing
with
the
comms
team
to
make
a
a
twitter
post
by
tomorrow
and
also
in
the
forum
post.
It
was
saying,
like
we
make
the
vote
tomorrow,
but
since
our
cultural,
normally
we
take
decisions
and
we
let
the
whole
weekend.
I
I
thought
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
post
it
on
friday.
E
So
it's
closing
on
monday
and
not
in
sunday
and
yeah.
It's
some
weighted
voting.
I
think
that's
how
our
hairstyle
works
so
yeah
I
mean
I'm
getting
the
last
pieces
of
feedback
and
there's
also
going
to
be
a
video
I've
suggested
to
make
a
video
on
how
to
use
a
snapshot
since
it's
a
new
tool
for
the
community.
I
it's
going
to
be
done
today,
which
very
simple
and
yeah.
Basically
it's
there
and
it's
going
to
be.
It
seems
like
the
first
one.
E
A
Yay-
and
so
is
this
gonna
be
this
is,
are
we
gonna
delete
this
snapshot
just
to
make
the
edits
for
the
timeline
here?
Yeah,
okay,.
A
A
new
a
totally
new
url,
okay,
a
totally
new
snapshot,
yeah,
okay,
cool
the
community
covenant.
I
don't
think
there's
much
to
say
about
that.
Actually,
any
is
there
anything
that
needs
to
be
said
about
the
community,
covenant
that
all
stewards
should
know
about
right
now,.
A
Yeah,
I
I
would
think
this
is
gonna
go
the
same
way.
I
don't
know
if
this
goes
to
the
hatch
style
or
if
it
goes
to
snapshot.
I
don't
actually
know
what
the
next
step
is
for
this,
but
I
guess
there's
not
a
lot
of
people
saying
this
is
a
terrible
idea
like
this
slide
is
a
terrible
idea.
Let's
not
do
it
so.
A
Okay
reward
system
moving
forward.
G
Just
so
you
know
it
doesn't
need
to
go
to
the
hashtag,
it
should
just
be
snapshot,
and
then
it
gets
voted
on
when
like
on
chain,
when
we
upgrade
basically
ratified
with
the
upgrade.
J
A
A
A
All
right,
so
this
is
still
maybe
a
little
more
work
needed
here.
Okay,
all
right,
so
this
is,
I
think,
something
that's
to
be
tackled
when
ivy's
back
and
has
a
lot
more
a
lot
more
to
do,
and
then
the
proposal
for
initial
buy.
So
this
is
something
that
I
think
mitch.
I
don't
know
if
mitch
was
interested
in
sort
of
spearheading,
this
liquidity
consideration
for
external
pools,
and
let
me
just
try
to
find
it
in
here.
A
And
nate
you
mentioned
an
interest
in
maybe
championing
down
to
dow
ideas.
Is
that
something
you'd
be
interested
in
doing
or
have
the
bandwidth
to
do?.
A
Yesterday,
you
mentioned
an
interest
in
the
data
dow
aspect
of
of
one
of
these
ideas.
A
Is
that
did
I
get
that
wrong?
Was
that
you
that
yesterday
said
you'd
be
interested
in
how
we
can
partner
with
other
dows?
Oh.
A
Okay,
is
that
something
that
you
feel
like
you
could
take
on
tramponing,
and
maybe
who
else
could
could
help
with
that
yeah.
B
I
would
need
some
advice
process
in
terms
of
like
you
know,
setting
boundaries
and
understanding
what
types
of
of
agreements
and
partnerships
we
can
make,
but
yeah.
A
Yeah,
to
be
honest,
it
seems
to
me,
like
there's,
actually
a
lot
of
conversation
around
this
from
the
maybe
the
commons
forum
team
as
well,
and
what
is
possible
within
the
aspects
of
you
know,
holding
tokens
for
as
a
dao
and
yeah.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
I'd
love
to
hear
your
ideas
on
this
griff
or
your
ideas.
G
A
G
I
mean
that
the
main
thing
is
that
you
can't
you
shouldn't,
do
it
through
the
main
dow,
it's
just
like
too
bureaucratic
to
go
through
the
main
dial
to
be
holding
some
fractions
of
tokens.
You
know
of
your
of
your,
but
you
can
have
like
you
know,
a
sub-dial
that
is
holding
diversified
assets
or
something
you
know
for
long-term
storage
or
whatever
or
like
alignment,
and
it
would
basically,
we
should
just
hold
these
in
a
sub-dial,
that's
a
little
more
agile
than
than
this,
and
they
would
just
be
like
oh
yeah.
G
E
Before
like
deciding
what
we
want
to
use
the
money
for,
we
should
decide
how
much
money
do
we
want
to
take
from
like
it.
Also,
as
grief
was
mentioning
on
the
forum
it
remove
activity
from
speculators.
If
we
take
a
lot
of
money,
maybe
speculators
won't
be
engaging,
and
this
is
also
not
I
mean
it
gives
they
bootstrap
our
economy.
So
it
can
be
good
and
yeah
and
when
we
know
like
the
money
we
are
thinking
to
take,
then
we
can
make
plans.
But
me
I
mean
I
don't
know
yeah
I
feel
like
we
like.
B
G
Yeah,
just
I
mean
we
only
we
I
mean
there's
only
so
much
money.
It
would
just
be
a
lot
of
slippage
on
the
bonding
curve
and
maybe
like
maybe
it
would
probably
totally
dissuade
people
from
even
participating
in
secondary
markets.
This
is
what
I
said
in
the
post,
at
least
that,
like
more
than
honestly
like
there
should.
I,
in
my
opinion,
like
doing
more
than
like
150k
period,
would
be
a
little
bit
dicey.
G
Just
like
you
know,
we
take
all
the
fun
out
of
it
for
any
speculators
to
come
in
they're,
just
like
oh
look,
they're
they're,
they're
minting
themselves
vested
tokens
and
then
they're
buying
all
the
good
tokens,
all
the
cheap
tokens
and
then
they're
going
to
give
it
to
other
people
who
can
sell
it.
You
know
it's
like
it's
not
as
exciting
if
you're
like
want
to
get
in
the
tc,
it
kind
of
dampens
the
spirit,
so
I
wouldn't
change.
G
But
just
like
to
put
in
perspective,
you
know
just
kind
of
feeling
into
it.
I
wouldn't
I
would
put
like
you
know:
don't
expect
to
buy
that
much
money
out
of
get
that
much
money
out
of
this.
You
know
maybe
100k
150k
max
for
totally
buying
out
of
the
bonding
curve.
Otherwise
it
just
it
wouldn't
feel
very
good
for
the
secondary
markets.
A
Yeah,
I
I
tend
to
agree
really
strongly
with
that.
It's
probably
going
to
be
something
yeah,
something
small
enough,
and
then
I
guess
it
really
comes
down
to
like
what
is
the
best
use
for
what
we're
doing
it
with
what
work
for
what
we're
using
it
with
you
know,
there's
an
interesting
point
that
angela
made
at
the
unconference
that
there
were
organizations
that
would
be
very
interested
in
supporting
token
engineering
commons,
but
weren't
able
to
participate
as
an
organization,
because
they,
you
know,
they're,
not
individuals,
so
they
weren't
hatchers.
A
They
were
unable
to
register
as
trusted
seed
and
participate
in
a
hatching
perspective,
and
we
had
a
recent
sink
and
I
sort
of
shared
this
proposal
with
her
and
her
thinking
was
that
people,
the
people
that
she
could
see
that
might
be
interested,
would
be
the
people
that
are
already
supporting.
They
took
an
engineering
academy,
so
they're
already
extremely
well
value
aligned
in
terms
of,
like
you
know,
open
source
goods,
educational
sources
for
for
token
engineering,
and
so
it
seemed
like
that
might
be.
A
One
avenue
of
you
know
really
well-value-aligned
organizations
that
would
we
would
want
to
be
involved
with
us,
but
would
also
be
yeah
would
also
yeah.
Maybe
we
could
entice,
that's
not
the
right
word,
but
sort
of
show
our
mutual
respect
by
by
offering
this
you
know
a
favorably
priced
token.
A
The
liquidity
idea
is
amazing.
Is
there
some
person
that
would
champion
that
idea
and
go
through
the
logistics
and
be
able
to
write
a
proposal
because
we're?
I
know
we
do
have
some
time
constraint
in
terms
of
getting
these
proposals
out
and
mitch.
Isn't
here?
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
he
would
be
interested
in
championing,
but
maybe
we
can
check
with
mitch
on
that
or
if
there's
somebody
else.
G
I
G
He
works
in
he's
in
the
one
hives
he's
in
the
common
swarm.
So
but
of
course
I
if
someone
else
wants
to
take
it,
it
shouldn't
be
in
my
heart.
It
just
won't
happen.
I
He's
actually
in
the
in
the
tc
discord
server
already.
I
just
tagged
him
in
the
in
the
stewards
channel.
Probably
I
can.
I
can
set
up
a
a
call
between
him
and
bradley
and
yeah,
take
some
notes
and
and
see
if
he
has
any
ideas.
G
A
E
G
G
No
because
if
we
put
in
the
common
pool,
then
we
then
people
can
buy
the
tec
tokens
before
we
can
because
then
we'd
have
to
vote
and
then
we
have
to
send
it
in
and
and
send
it
to
a
dow
and
then
the
dow
would
finally
have
the
rap
decks
die
and
then
it
would
go
by
the
tc
tokens
and
and
at
the
at
the
time
that
we
launched
the
curve.
You
know
there's.
No
one
else
can
buy
besides
us
because
we're
making
we
could
buy
in
the
same
transaction.
G
G
Thanks
for
popping
in
man,
we
were
just
we
were
just
talking
about
you.
Well,
she
was
speaking
speaking
your
praises
and
where
we
heard
that
you're,
like
the
man
to
talk
to
about
doing
liquidity,
money.
L
I
well
thanks
chewie,
I
I
guess
it
depends
on
what
kind
of
context
you
mean
I've
been
doing
a
bit
of
research
into
it,
just
because
my
my
role
working
with
the
defense,
where
I'm
over
at
one
hive.
So
I
have
some
context-
and
I
can
maybe
you
know,
offer
some
some
thoughts
and
options
if
you're
all
curious
about
it.
G
Yeah
we
were
wondering
if,
if
we,
if
we
had
tec
tokens,
could
we
actually
just
use
them
in
any
of
the
infrastructure
that
you
have
to
reward
liquidity
provision
for
tec
versus
honey,
or
anything
like
that.
L
So,
let's
see
tec
is
on
is
primarily
on
x,
die
right,
okay,
so
there's
as
far
as
the
dexes
that
I'm
tracking
there's
really
three
that
have
interesting
options.
That'd
be
available
for
liquidity,
for,
like
liquidity,
mining,
one
hive,
honey
swap
you
know
with
the
honeycomb-
is
an
option.
L
I
think
there'd
be
a
lot
of
support
for
doing
that.
Just
in
the
interest
of
full
transparency,
though,
like
the
the
governance
of
honeycomb
and
farming
rewards
is
currently
a
bit
of
a
scrum,
so
I
I
unfortunately
don't
have
like
the
the
swarm,
doesn't
have
the
autonomy
to
be
able
to
just
say,
like
okay
cool,
like
we
have
a
pool
that
we
can
allocate
to
tec
and
like
we'll,
set
it
at
this.
Much
right
like
that,
like
on
the
xdi
side.
Unfortunately,
like
we're
a
bit
handcuffed.
G
There,
so
I
just
want
to
make
this
clear
what
if
we
didn't,
even
ask
you
to
allocate
your
own
tokens,
but
instead,
actually,
we
provided
tec
tokens
that
would
actually
act
to
reward
people
who
are
providing
liquidity
there
yeah.
L
Yeah,
that
would
be
awesome
at
present.
There's
no
capability
on
the
honeycomb
side
to
be
able
to
support
that
swapper,
on
the
other
hand,
does
have
that
they
have
tooling,
where
you
can
just
go
and
like
create
your
own
liquidity,
farms
right
off
the
bat
cool.
L
Yep
they're
on
next
time,
swappers
on
x,
die.
I
know
sushi
also
has
like
dual
dual
reward:
farms
but,
like
I,
don't
have
any
any
connections
to
that
community.
So
I
couldn't
necessarily
say
it's
not
self-service
in
this
way.
That
swapper
is
right,
like
swapper
is
fully
self-service
and
then
you
can
also,
like
you
know,
go
hit
up
their
the
dx
dow
and
ask
them
if
they
want
to
do
matching
or
anything
like
that.
G
G
Well
that
those
were
our
main
questions.
So
thanks
a
lot
man.
L
A
G
I'm
sure
I
can
throw
someone
at
this
doing
this
kind
of
stuff
is
not
hard.
I
bet
one
of
the
general
magic
guys
or
somebody
if
no
one
else
wants
to
champion,
I
I
can
champion
the
technical
side,
but
the
political
side,
I'm
hoping
to
pass
the
back.
A
Okay,
yeah,
it's
actually
a
very
good
question
seems
like
mitch
might
want
to
champion
the
political
side,
because
it
was
his
idea
originally
and
he
seems
to
to
be
supporting
it
as
well.
A
I'm
I'm
seeking
out
through
angela
and
ygg,
is
always
also
interested
in
this
perspective
of
like
how
we
can
bring
in
strategic
partners.
So
I
think
we'll
be
looking
at
this
side.
I
don't
know
if
it'll
pan
out
to
anything
or
not,
but
at
least
the
conversations
already
started
happening,
then
the
data
down
partnerships
nate,
you
know
I
think
jessica-
is
a
great
person
to
talk
to
as
part
of
as
the
sort
of
common
stack
ecosystem
development
lead.
A
M
A
I
Usually
dash
and
installer
are
pretty
good
for
starting
these
conversations
I
can.
I
can
look
into
it.
I
Actually,
I
mean
probably
it's
too
soon
and
you're
all
going
to
hate
the
idea,
but
I
got
a
contacted
by
a
cex
like
a
new
cex
from
mexico
that
is
interested
in
some
of
the
projects
living
in
in
excite,
including
tec,
and
I
asked
sam
like
what
would
it
take
like
to
to
list
to
listen
on
the
tc
to
open
an
exchange
like
how
could
it
work
with
a
bonding
curve
and
apparently
it
it
would
be
like
kind
of
a
a
nightmare
and
and
yeah
it's
just
something
that
it's
not
really
like
compatible.
I
However,
I
started
talking
to
solar
about
it
because
it
should
be
easier
in
with
honey
and
in
agave,
and
I'm
I'm
having
some
conversations
with
him
about
this.
So
probably
I
could
just
start
talking
to
him
about
some
stuff
that
we
could
also
like
put
together
but
yeah
like
not
the
cx
idea,
though,
but.
G
I
G
Those
are
those
are
opportunities.
Those
are
great,
the
more
arbitrage,
the
better
okay,
I
mean.
The
main
thing
is:
first,
we
have
to
vote
that
it's
going
to
be
transferable,
I'm
pretty
sure
it
will
be
but
like
if
it's
non-transferable,
then
it
won't
work,
but
there
shouldn't
be
a
problem
just
because
it's
issued
from
a
bonding
curve.
It's
still
just
a
normal
token
that
you
can
put
on
anything.
I
Okay,
so
what
would
they
need
to
like
acquire
a
bunch
of
of
a
tec
for
for
listing
it
or
what
would
be
the.
G
I
mean
that's
up
to
them.
Most
of
these
exchanges
usually
charge
a
listing
fee
and
they're
like
looking
for
us
to
give
them
money
to
do
it
and
that's
probably
not
that'd,
be
something
we'd
have
to
vote
on
or
something
but
like
for
them
to
just
put
it
up
there
I
mean,
I
think
all
they
need
is
the
token
address
and
decimals
and
they're
off
to
the
races.
Token
name
I
mean
seriously,
all
they
need
is
a
token
address
and
they
should
be
able
to
put
on
their
exchange.
I
Okay,
I'll
I'll
look
into
that,
but
yeah
I'll
leave
that.
A
Yeah,
I
guess
I'm
I'm
questioning
whether
paying
a
centralized
exchange
to
list
us
on
would
would
be
something
that
would
fly
with
the
community
in
general.
I
feel
like
that.
I
mean-
maybe
that's
a
future
use
case,
but
not
a
use
case
for
this
initial
set
of
tokens.
A
A
This
is
this
is
really
like
really
strategic
value
value
alignment
with
with
groups
or
individuals.
A
A
A
E
Like
the
thing
it
would
be
like
the
it
would
give
us
an
interest
on
our
frontend
pool,
but
yeah
I
mean
it
was
the
same
idea
and
same
always
have
good
ideas,
but.
N
E
A
E
G
So,
like
kind
of
like
compound
yeah,
you
know
like,
like
you
get
c
dye
or
like
you,
get
a
die
from
ave,
so
you
send.
This
would
be
something
that
we
could
do.
That
should
happen.
If
that
we
should
discuss
before
the,
and
I
have.
I
would
honestly
ask
agave
to
lead
the
charge
on
it
because,
like
they're,
the
ones
who
would
really
benefit
from
it
but
saying
hey
in
our
bonding
curve
or
in
our
common
pool,
we
should
have.
G
G
G
M
I
haven't
tried
it,
but
I'll
send
you
a
link.
D
I
haven't
tried
I've
just
read
over
it:
I've
checked
it
it's
the
anchor
protocol,
which
is
it
runs
on
terra
and
it's
the
one
providing
the
swaps
on
the
wallet
and
they
just
they're
giving
away
at
least
that's
what
it
looks
like
1950,
19.5
percent
staking
the
dollar,
the
the
us
dollar
terror.
D
A
I
just
I
want
to
just
pause
this
conversation
to
say
it's
a
really
intriguing
conversation
and
it
maybe
sounds
like
we
need
a
treasury
management
committee
or
treasury
management
working
group
who
can
really
focus
on
this
as
the
core
task
of
the
working
group.
I
don't
know
that
the
stewards
is
going
to
be
the
right
place
to
hash
this
out,
to
be
honest,
but
it
did
at
least
surface
that
there's
a
need
for
this
converse.
This
conversation
to
happen
in
the
tec.
A
In
a
more
you
know,
with
with
the
voices
and
experience
and
expertise
that
people
have.
So
what
would
be
the
rest
best
way
to
do
that?
How
is
our
dow
going
to
handle
our
treasury?
That's
a
that's.
A
big
question
mark.
E
I
really
think
the
approach
would
be
through
the
community.
I
I
really
don't
like
how
experts
and
you
know,
people
that
you
have
yeah.
I
mean
the
way
I
was
trying
to
build
transparency,
for
example,
with
the
ad
it's
like
community
have
to
do
it,
because
if
transparency
is
saying
like
they're
reviewing
it
or
they
you
know,
then
it's
a
bureaucratic
system
where
transparency
could
say.
Oh
I
I
think
this
is
not
correct
audit
or
you
know.
A
D
B
Also
feel
like
this
is
really
difficult
because
we
don't
have
the
I
like.
In
my
honest
opinion,
we
don't
have
the
right
people
for
this.
I
I
do
think
we
need
to
really
search
for
individuals
who
are
really
good
with
the
treasury
management
aspect
of
things,
and
I
think
they're
kind
of
few
and
far
between
the
dow
space.
But
I
don't.
N
D
Even
even
if
we
look
for
people
out
there,
which
is
with
with
expertise
which
I
don't
see,
why
not,
but
it
should
be
led
by
a
group
inside
the
daw
I
mean
we
can,
we
can
request,
you
know,
advice
from
anyone
out
there.
If
we
are
not
experts
on
treasury,
but
we
should
be
leaving.
I
I
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
like
anyone
outside
of
the
dial
taking
those
decisions,
even
if
they
are
just
proposals.
A
A
A
G
G
We
just
need
people
to
lead
the
group
and
then
advice
process
with
people
who
have
a
good
view
of
what's
available,
what's
safe
and
has
some
opinions,
and
I
can
definitely
provide
some
experts
if,
like
like
santi's
leading
not
a
lawyer
but
he's
leading
our
legal
working
group
right,
you
know,
I
think,
that's
okay,.
A
G
Yeah,
like
I
mean
even
even
just
the
higher
level,
there's
always
the
details
and
then
there's
a
higher
level
like
do
we
even
want
to
there's
there's
like
three
questions
here,
it's
like
do
we
put
in
the
do
we
put
in
the
bonding
curve.
Do
we
put
in
the
common
pool?
Do
we
put
it
in
both?
Do
we
put
it
in
either
right,
those
are
the
options
and
and
what
the
asset
is.
That's
like
a
detail
honestly
that
I
think
we're
getting
caught
up
on
in
some
ways.
E
Yeah
another
problem
I
see
like
this
is
a
privileged
position
where
imagine
like
I'm
the
person
on
chart
right
and
then
oh.
J
E
E
D
But
that's
the
reason:
it's
not
just
one
person,
it's
gonna
be
people
who
will
have
to
approve.
It
approve
the
proposal
that
would
have
to
be
bothered
by
the
tao
and
then
after
the
dow
voting
he
will
have
back.
The
group
will
have
to
be
in
charge
of
you
know,
managing
whatever
has
been
voted
on
on
the
dow,
but
not
just
one
person
it
will
be.
It
will
have
to
be
a
democratic
process.
E
D
Him
out
of
the
dal,
you
know
why
someone
who's
in
charge
of
the
treasury
right
now
or
the
tour,
the
three
people
that
have
the
keys.
If
we
have
the
money
in
nazis
or
whatever
you
know,
run
away
with
the
money
there's
we
have
to
put
whatever
we
can
in
charge
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we
avoid
risking,
but
but
we
gotta
trust
the
people
on
our
community.
Otherwise,
there
is
no
way
to
move
forward.
A
A
In
order
to
create
a
proposal
that
then
the
community
can
discuss.
If
we
just
say,
hey
community,
what
are
treasury
management
options,
it
can
get
very
chaotic
very
quickly
and
the
idea
would
be
the
you
know
the
you
would.
We
would
share
something
so
that
everyone
can
then
weigh
in
on
it
and
then
share
the
pros
and
cons
sort
of
like
we're
doing
right
now.
For
these
these
proposals
under
advice
process,
I.
D
I
agree,
and
on
top
of
that,
if
we
end
up
doing
something
like
this,
we
should
have
a
board
a
transform
board
where
everyone
can
see
the
performance
of
the
treasury
there
and
right
away.
If
we
see
that
something
is
not
moving
in
the
direction
that
the
dow
bought
it
or
whatever
was
proposed,
we
can
just
stop.
You
know
keeping
the
money
there.
A
Yeah
all
right,
big
topic:
anybody
want
to
add
any
final
thoughts
before
we
move
on
to
the
next
one.
G
Could
I
just
propose
that
the
the
treasury
management
working
group,
if
it
if,
if
or
when
it
eventually
forms-
maybe
it
just
comes
out
of
transparency
as
a
vibe?
You
know
like
a
lot
of
these
working
groups
that
we've
had
so
far.
Are
they
kind
of
evolve
out
of
a
working
group
and
if
there's
a
working
group
that
I
would
want
it
to
evolve
out
of
it
would
be
transparency,
I
don't
think
it's
safka
or
any
of
these
other
groups.
G
So
maybe
maybe
we
find
the
people
and
they
emerge
out
of
the
transparency
working
group.
E
A
Okay,
all
right
very
cool
yeah
there's.
I
have
no
strong
reaction
to
that
like
it
sounds
like
it'd,
be
nice
for
finances
to
be
very
transparent,
and
if
that's,
if
that's
where
it
ends
up
cool.
A
Okay,
anything
any
last
last
thoughts
before
we
switch
to
another
subject.
We
have
three
minutes
left.
D
No,
no
just
from
my
point,
whatever
we
end
up
whatever
that
group
you
know
starts
from
transparency
for
sure
it's
going
to
be
there.
You
know
in
there.
F
Okay,
I'm
just
going
to
interject
real
quick,
because
I'm
not
sure
we
have
time
enough
to
start
anything
else.
Anyways,
I'm
just
going
to
bump
up
my
issue
to
say
that
me,
please
working
groups,
if
you
could
give
me
some
very
precise
wishes
for
a
new
contributor,
so
it
sounds
like
we
need
to
put
out
the
feelers
for
some
pretty
pretty
specific
roles.
So
the
last
wish
list
we
did
was
kind
of
general
and
I'm
sure
it
generated.
F
A
Katie
shared
her
her
list
in
this
in
the
agenda:
yeah,
okay,
very
quickly,
critical
to
commons
upgrade
there
is
a
zen
how
board
that
we
aren't
working
on.
Maybe
this
needs
to
be
a
completely
separate
meeting
itself,
but
we
will
be
doing
sprint
planning
on
friday
and
as
part
of
that
process,
we
will
be
identifying
everything
that
is
critical
to
our
commons
upgrade.
A
So
the
focus
of
our
sprint
planning
this
week
will
be
not
only
to
plan
our
sprint
for
the
next
two
weeks,
but
also
to
identify
everything
from
each
working
group.
That's
critical
to
the
commons
upgrade
and
and
tagging
it
there
and
then
so.
The
one
hive
tv
t
wells
reached
out
to
me
about
having
tec
on
and
I
thought
today.
It
would
be
interesting
for
us
to
sort
of
push
the
cultural
aspect
of
of
the
tec.
A
So
maybe
I
would
give
like
a
quick
update
on
where
we
are
in
terms
of
the
phases
phase.
One
phase
two
wonka
could
share
the
graviton
training
coming
up.
Someone
from
params
could
share
the
educational
aspect
of
the
dashboard
and
ygg
has
agreed
to
share
the
labs
curriculum
coming
up.
I
guess
that's
a
good
idea,
I
don't
know
if
anyone
has
any
other
feedback
on
that,
but
I
thought
it
would
be
nice
to
sort
of
represent
multiple
stewards.
From
from
on
that
new
program
of
one
hive.
A
It's
t
wells
and
I'm
figuring
out
our
timing,
I'm
waiting
for
a
response
from
him,
either
this
week
or
next
week.
So
I
I'll
I'll
reach
out
to
you
specifically,
and
maybe,
if
you
could
point
me
in
the
direction
of
someone
in
params,
who
would
be
interested
in
would
be.
Who
could
do
that
be
torn
again?
I
don't
know
lauren
mitch.
A
A
Okay,
cool
all
right
we're
at
top
of
the
hour,
and
I
wanted
chewie
to
present
his
calm
style.
But
if
you
haven't
already
seen
it,
I'm
pretty
sure
everyone
has
jump
in
the
agenda
and
there's
a
link
to
his
proposal
and.
I
I
also
attached
the
link
in
the
end,
if
you
want
to
add,
like
some
comments,
please
do
like
this.
This
is
going
to
be
really
good
for
getting
a
more
solid
proposal.
So
thanks
dan.