►
From YouTube: W62 Community Stewards: Open space for perspectives, Check-in on Rewards progress and more!
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tamara
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Do
the
beginning
of
our
stewards
weekly
is
temperature
check,
so
how
are
things
going
for
you
for
the
rookies
that
you're
participating
in
for
the
community
and
last
time
this
community,
this
stuart?
A
This
temperature
check
ran
quite
long
because
we
had
so
many
people
in
the
call,
so
I'm
going
to
probably
set
a
timer
for
a
minute
and
a
half
just
so
that
we
can
have
time
for
everyone
to
speak,
but
also
for
there
to
be
enough
time
sort
of
for
the
rest
of
the
agenda
as
well
and
I'll
pass
to
chewie.
Do
you
want
to
get
us
started.
B
Yes,
sam.
Thank
you
it
this
this
past
week
felt
felt
really
good
felt
like
like
having
like
taking
a
distance
between
like
denver
and
in
the
taoist,
and
in
so
far
this
week
has
been
really
like
an
opportunity
to
like
reapproach
things
and
and
consider
like
different
factors
like
around
the
funding
proposals.
B
So
for
comms.
I
feel
really
good
because
it's
starting
to
get
warmed
up,
but
in
a
process
that
has
learned
a
lot
from
what
experiences
we've
been
through
so
yeah.
I'm
feeling
really
good
about
that
and
I'll
pass
it
to
edu.
C
That's
actually
nice
to
have
you
congratulations
on
the
taoist
by
the
way,
and
so
I
have
I
have
like
a.
C
I
have
like
a
mixed
feeling
week,
where
I
have
had
a
lot
of
work
this
week
and-
and
I
feel
really
happy
to
have
accomplished
my
duties
in
a
way
and
also
to
present
on
the
token
academy,
introduction
today
and
seek
and
sing
with
angela
on
that
there
are
some
updates.
I
need
to
share
regarding
that
and
then,
on
the
other
hand,
yeah,
I
I
feel
we
still
need
to
work
about
how
we
react
to
things
so
myself
included.
C
D
Thanks
yeah,
I
think
everything's
pretty
good.
I
you
know,
I
don't
really
have
much
to
add
to
that.
I
just
I
feel
like
within
the
community.
People
have
been
pretty
positive
and
we
do
have
a
little
bit
of
criticisms
here
and
there,
but
it's
not
something
that
I
think
we're
handling
poorly.
D
I
think
we're
doing
really
well
engaging
with
people
and
not
avoiding
conflict
which
is
really
nice
to
see
yeah
and
so
taking
durgadoss's
lesson
of
not
not
being
nice,
although
that's
too
nice
all
the
time,
so
yeah
we're
doing
pretty
good
I'll
pass
it
over
to
zepty.
E
E
Oh
man,
okay
temperature
check,
I
just
walked
in
temperature,
check
yeah.
You
know,
I'm
feeling
pretty
pretty
good
and
warm
I
mean
we
were
at
the.
I
really
enjoyed
the
taoist
mexico
and
it
was
great
to
see
manu
presenting
the
tc
and
griff
giving
the
talk
about
collaborative
economics,
and
I
honestly
think
that
the
collaborative
economics
talk
that
griff
gave
was
like
one
of
the
best
talks.
I've
seen
him
give
like.
E
E
I
think
it's
a
really
great
piece
of
content
that
now
we
have
like
to
share
with
dc
and
with
the
common
stack,
and
so
it
was
really
nice
to
have
a
representation
there
for
the
tc
and
and
other
than
that
I
yeah
other
than
that.
Just
just
just
feeling
neutral
feeling
warm
nothing
major
else
to
add.
I
will
pass
it
to
maybe
I'll
pass
it
to
chewie
if
he
hasn't
gone.
F
No,
I
heard
you
getting
blindsided
in
the
other
room,
so
I
was
like.
I
was
ready
for
it,
it's
cool,
so
I'm
feeling
pretty
good.
The
the
first
quant
actually,
I
think,
went
super
well.
We
had
like
a
nice
sync
session.
People
were
getting
onboarded.
We
were
like
triggering
all
this
stuff
to
improve
the
ux
and
I
think
everybody
finished
the
quantifications
on
time
which
is
like
wow.
That's
that's
amazing,
like
coordinating
all
that,
so
I'm
feeling
pretty
hot
about
that.
F
Apart
from
that
honestly,
I've
been
I've
been
out
of
the
loop
with
a
lot
of
the
other
working
groups.
So
I'm
excited
to
hear
more
in
this
stuart's
call
about
that
and
I'll
give
it
back
to
tam
because
yeah
I'm
late.
A
I'll
slay
it
over
to
huanka.
G
Thanks
tom,
well,
I
feel
like
the
temperature,
for
me
is
I
I
don't
know
if
we
can
say
that
temperature
is
like
that,
but
it's
like.
G
G
I
really
like
to
see
jeremy
and
lean
taking
a
call
bianca
also,
and
tomorrow
we
will
start
a
book
club.
Also,
the
proposal
is
passing
and
other
communities
are
outreaching.
So
I
don't
know
things
are,
are
going
really
really
fast,
but
I'm
glad
that
they
are
going
that
way
and
I'll
pass
to
leave.
E
Hey
temperature
is.
H
I
think
coming
back
from
this
week
in
denver
and
the
taoist
happening.
It
feels
like
a
lot
of
external,
a
moment
where
we
were
sharing
a
lot
with
with
people
from
outside
and
then
maybe
now
is
the
time
to
like
recollect
and
look
in
a
little
bit
more
and
see
what
are
the
things
that
need
to
be
taken
care
of,
and
I
feel
like
there
is
a
lot
of
small
things
that
are
requesting
attention
and
that
we
are
like
looking
at
them
with
with
calm
in
a
nice
way.
H
I
Okay
thanks,
well,
I
think
I'd
say
the
tc's
on
fire
when
they
get
changed
on
the
good
side.
I
haven't
been
here
for
much,
but
I
feel
like
there's
so
much
happening.
Things
are
moving.
I
hope
in
the
good
sense
I
don't
know
like
all
the
working
groups
are
doing
great
stuff.
I
That
always,
if
you
remember
it,
just
feels
great,
I
think,
and
with
that
I'll
pass
it
on
to
yoga.
J
So
yeah,
I
think
my
temperature
check
is
a
little
weird
just
because
I've
got
so
much
happening
in
my
personal
life
that
I
don't
know
that
it's
fair
to
project
any
of
that
onto
the
token
engineering
comments,
but
if
I'm
not
around
as
much
as
usual
or
seem
a
bit
more
gadflyish
than
normal.
J
That's
probably
why
so
yeah
just
yeah-
I
I
do
you
know
I
do
still
have
you
know,
concerns
about
us
replicating
the
old
model
of
of
things,
and
I
know
it's
our
intention
to
not
do
that,
but
I
still
still
see
a
bunch
of
signs
that
that's
possible.
So
I
a
little
worried
about
that
lately.
But
again,
I'm
I'm
interpreting
that
as
being
a
reflection
of
my
sort
of
outer
world
right
now.
So
so
that's
kind
of
my
temperature
check
thanks,
I'm
not
sure
who's
gone.
K
Hey
so,
as
you
know,
my
temperature
check
on
the
comment
always
kind
of
comes
through
the
funnel
or
the
tunnel
of
omega
the
working
group
that
I
tried
to
make
time
for
and
there
to
be
honest.
There
are
some
newcomers,
amazing,
some
poetry,
going
on
check
it
out.
Satori
is
on
fire
so
that
funneling,
that
type
of
energy
is
for
that.
K
What
energizes
me
I
look
forward,
but
at
the
same
time
I
also
realized
in
the
past
weeks
that
yeah,
but
there
are
some
concerns
about
power
dynamics
not
being
as
radically
inclusive,
as
as
people
saw
tech
to
be,
and
I
think
these
are
values
that
need
to
protect.
That's
why
I
showed
up
today
as
well.
So
I
hope
I
can
help.
A
Yeah,
absolutely
jeremy.
Do
you
want
to
share
your
thoughts.
L
For
sure,
so
my
temperature
check
is,
I'm
not
sure
to
what
extent
it
reflects
me
or
the
the
scene,
but
I
definitely
have
some
sense
of
like
very
close
to
almost
to
overheating
right
there.
There
was
been
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
action
that
that
my
energy
has
gone
into.
It's
been
sort
of
a
gestation
phase,
and
now
it
feels
like
it
unironically.
L
All
of
those
things
that
I
was
putting
energy
into
are
just
exploding
at
once,
which
on
one
hand,
is
like.
Oh
great,
you
know
all
these
wonderful
things
I
wanted
to
have
happen
and
the
confluence
of
all
those
things
has
me
like
torn
in
several
different
directions.
So
there's
thank
you
for
being
present
to
that
anybody
else.
M
Oops,
thank
you.
My
temper
to
check
is
that
I'm
it's
super
hot
because,
like
yeah,
we've
been
talking
about
a
lot
of
cool
things
about
tc
in
daoist
mexico
with
our
members,
so
I'm
very
motivated
and
like
ready
to
give
you
more
so
my
temper
check
is
very
hot.
That's
it.
A
Cool
and
then
maybe
I'll
close
us
out
and
say
you
know
I
I
also
have
something
happening
in
my
life
that
is
making
things
very.
I
guess
I
am
adjusting.
A
We
have
a
brand
new
puppy
in
the
house
and,
if
anyone's
had
a
brand
new
puppy,
you're,
basically
just
cleaning
poop
all
day
like
so
I'm
cleaning
a
lot
of
poop,
so
I'm
adjusting
to
having
a
puppy
in
the
house,
which
is
a
little
bit
chaotic,
but
I'm
trying
my
best
to
keep
calm
inside
the
chaos
and
I'm
gonna
say
you
know.
A
What's
going
on,
I
just
there's
so
much
I
mean
I
did
the
first
quantification
since
you
know
last
year
for
so
long,
so
I
feel,
like
that's
a
huge
huge
milestone
that
we
have
quantifications,
going
that
soon
we'll
be
actually
distributing
tec
to
people
who
are
contributing,
and
I
I
can't
even
stress
how
I
think,
how
that's
going
to
positively
impact
people
who
are
contributing
so
like
kudos
to
everyone
on
the
reward
team
and
made
for
getting
the
coordination
for
quantifiers
together,
especially,
I
also
want
to
say,
like
I'm,
getting
questions
about
proposals.
A
You
know
wesley
who's.
The
creator
of
token
log
started
asking
about
how
to
submit
proposals.
We
have
a
lot
of
proposals.
We
have
teams,
proposals,
gravity,
consilience
libraries,
so
we
have
a
lot
of
proposals
on
conviction
voting
right
now
as
it
is,
it
is,
and
I
overall
feel,
like
super
positive.
I
think
it's
amazing
to
see
like
the
autonomy
of
people
in
the
tec
ma
manu's
talk
is
extraordinary.
A
A
lot
of
other
contributors
who
feel
they
are
able
to
you
know,
see
what
needs
to
be
done
and
share
their
thoughts
and
on
it.
Okay
and
I'm
gonna
move
on
to
the
next
subject,
because
I
ran
out
of
time
for
myself.
A
So
there
was
some
some
different,
some
perspectives
that
I
think
is
worth
us
taking
the
time
to
look
at
around
these
documents
that
was
shared
by
gideon
first
with
just
a
few
people
and
then
in
the
communitas
call
yesterday
and
chebnam
had
some
thinking
around
it,
and
I
just
wanted
to
ask
if
she
can
help
share
her
perspective
on
it.
A
She
raised
some
flags
around,
maybe
the
process
or
what
we
should
be
focusing
on
in
in
the
tec,
and
I
wanted
to
to
have
well
to
hear
there's
some
text
going
back
and
forth,
and
I
thought
oh
we're
gonna
in
real
time
be
able
to
to
share
perspectives.
It
would
be
a
lot
more
effective
than
trying
to
understand
things
through
text.
So
I'd
like
to
give
the
floor
to
you
shebnem.
A
If
you
will
to
share
your
thinking
and
maybe
we'll
pass
around
and
do
one
one
minute
to
show
thoughts
afterwards,.
K
Yeah
so
so,
first
of
all
kudos
to
gideon
for
taking
it
up
and
definitely
he
you
know
uncovered
the
question
who
is
tech
serving
and
how
and-
and
I
guess
number
one
is-
you
know
how
I
discovered
the
document
is
by
someone
saying.
Oh,
this
is
so
sad.
K
They
want
to
exclude
people
and
that's
the
you
know,
mindset
that
I
went
in
and
maybe
looking
for
flags
so
just
to
clarify
that
it
was
not
transparent.
How
document
ended
up
in
the
stewards
group
and
be
tagged
by
you
know?
Just
a
few
people
were
attacked,
whereas
I
know
that
you
know
or
from
what
I
know
in
omega
durgadas
and
nick
you
know,
are
people
who
have
been
asking
the
same
questions
quite
loud,
especially
in
the
past
weeks.
K
That's
just
the
process,
but
then
I
love
the
question
in
in
that
document,
and
I
think
you
know
the
bigger
question
as
as
he
points
out
as
well.
So
I
think
it
is
really
worth
going
into
that
big
question.
K
I
wouldn't
just
press
it
into
one
document
because
it's
a
really
big
question
and
I
think
it
requires
maybe
also
to
look
into
our
community
advice
process
like
not
the
small
things
but
really
fundamental
things
right
and
how
can
we
make
or
how
can
we
make
use
of
processes
that
are
more
participatory
than
sharing
a
document?
So
these
are
the
things
I
think
I
made
comments
on.
K
Yeah
so,
and
and
yeah
like,
I
think,
mixing
many
things
into
one
document
is
really
tough.
He
gideon
makes
a
point
in
how
we
might
be
wasting
resources
of
tech
by
being
inefficient
in
working
groups
and
how
he
wants
to
address
that,
which,
I
think
is
a
wallet
valid
point.
If
that
is
so,
and
I
do
also
believe
that
you
know
how
to
improve
efficiency
and
productivity
is
something
actually
industrialist.
K
The
industrialized
world
is
very
good
at,
so
I
wouldn't
see
a
problem
into
going
that,
but
taking
that
mindset
and
then
actually
trying
to
in
the
same.
K
Effort
put
that,
on
top
of
the
token
engineering
community,
I
think
it's
it's
not
the
right
way.
I
think
it
would
waste
the
main
resource
of
this
community,
which
is
its
ingenuity
through
its
diversity
and
its
openness,
and
I
think
the
token
engineering
commons,
with
respect
to
that
big
question,
has
definitely
one
fundamental
job.
That
is
anyone
who
holds
a
token
in
their
wallet
and
they
find
their
ways
here.
K
How
can
we
help
them
become?
You
know:
self-sovereign,
informed
participants
of
token
economies,
that's
our
collective
job
yeah.
So
that's
why
I
thought
you
know
I
saw
gates
and
I
asked
for
the
function
of
the
gate.
If
that
is
you
know
if
that
function
is
developing
from
day
one
from
the
moment
they
enter
this
discord,
I'm
totally
fine
with
it
and
and
offered
support.
K
If
that
function
is-
and
I
saw
a
pyramid-
basically,
you
know
development
is
at
the
top
of
the
pyramid.
You
know
if
you
work
your
way
through
and
at
the
end
of
it
you're
gonna
get
developed.
That's
the
typical
industrial
way
of
you
know
managing
human
resources,
and
that's
something
that's
very
wasteful.
K
It's
something
that
we
shouldn't
bring
into
decentralized
autonomous
organizations
trying
to
innovate
their
ways
into
finding
new
ways.
So
that's
that
was,
I
think,
what
triggered
me
on
many
levels
and
again
I
apologize
if
I
or
I
know
I
am
very
direct
when
I
value
something.
So
I
apologize
if
that
was
personal,
but
I
just
want
to
say
I
think
if
we
can
separate
those
two
concerns
and
handle
the
bigger
question
with
more
participatory
methods,
it's
a
great
effort
and
again
kudos.
C
I
can,
if
I,
if
I
may,
I
want
to
take
just
a
quick
answer
to
this,
to
provide
context,
because
I
feel
we
are
missing
a
bit
of
context
on
this
topic.
C
This
document
that
gideon
and
that
was
mentioned
before
is
a
document
that
has
been
worked
since
the
last
three
or
four,
probably
four
months
on
the
process
of
building
the
user
journey
for
someone
in
the
dec,
and
this
was
taken
initially
by
ms
lds
allo
issues,
even
nick
at
some
point
regarding
the
dashboard,
then
we
had
input
from
durgars
regarding
other
aspects,
talking
about
personal
development
and
all
these
aspects,
and
there
has
been
now
working
in
our
working
group.
We
have
working
on
this
and
we're
working
for
a
long
time.
C
Ms
had
this
on
his
plate,
and
then
he
found
himself
unable
to
deliver,
and
then
we
move
on
to
gideon,
on
my
request
that
he
could
take
this
on
and
write
a
piece
that
could
gather
all
these
ideas.
That
has
been
worked
for
four
months
in
our
working
group,
and
this
is
something
that
I
wanna
and
I
will
stand
by
it
is
that
we
have
present
in
every
working
group
called.
We
have
talked
about
this
process
going
on.
We
have
shared
the
documents
regarding
the
process
that
we
have
followed.
C
There
has
been
complete
transparency
with
nick
and
drugas
regarding
this
process.
This
was
not
hidden
on
from
anyone,
and
it
was
just
that
this
particular
document,
which
is
basically
the
summary
of
all
this
process
that
we
have
been
trying
to
build
up,
was
just
finished
at
the
first
draft,
because
this
is
a
draft
that
was
finished
by
gideon
and
gideon,
seek
requests
from
nate,
cam
and
me
initially
and
on
the
call
monday.
I
request
specifically
to
gideon
to
please
share
this
publicly.
C
So
people
who
were
part
of
this
initial
process
were
on
the
loop
of
this.
If
you
want
to
provide
a
first
layer
of
draft
first
layer
of
comments
and
feedback
actually
drew
that
as
well
part
of
that
call
too
and
where
he
was
putting
aware,
while
he
was
already
aware
of
this,
because
he
met
with
gideon
in
the
past
weeks
regarding
this
document
too.
C
So
for
me
is
that
we
we
need
to
be
really
careful
about
making
assumptions
without
properly
context,
and
not
only
that
going
to
you
know
going
to
a
document
that
someone
openly
created
from
a
very
openness
way
without
any
assumption.
This
is
not.
This
is
not
even
a
proposal,
yet
it
was
just
a
document
that
serves
as
a
guide
as
a
summary
of
all
the
efforts
we
have
been
trying
to
push
forward,
but
it
was
not
a
law.
It
was
not
code.
C
It
was
not
anything
that
we
were
gonna
become
along
the
tc
yet
or
anything
close
to
it.
Yet
because
it
was
a
draft
of
a
document.
So
I
felt
at
some
point
yeah.
I
felt
that
this
needed
to
be
talked
before
a
little
bit
in
order
to
make
any
assumptions
that
will
offend
or
make
someone
feel
offended
just
because
we
need
yeah.
We
need
a
little
more
of
context.
Those
these
are
my
only
clarifications
I
wanted
to
make
and
that's
it
and
I
will
pass
it
on
to
nate.
D
Yeah,
I
just
my
comment
around
this
was
that
before
you
know,
people
get
tensions
really
high
around
stuff
like
this.
This
is
the
advice
process
in
practice
and
I
think
it's
working
really
well,
if
you,
if
you
think
about
just
kind
of
like
an
individual
working
on
a
piece
of
work,
they
submit
their
ideas,
they
get
critiqued.
D
D
So
I
I
want
to
say
before
we
start
critiquing
each
other
and
the
way
we
were
working,
I
think
it
is
working.
I
think
this
is
just
part
of
it
and
when
it
comes
to
the
gatekeeping
and
things
around
authority,
I
read
some
of
sevendem's
comments
and
I
agree
for
the
most
part.
I
think
that
these
are
very
touchy
subjects
that
we
have
to
keep
an
eye
on,
but
I
also
think
that
ignoring
or
just
saying
that
authority
shouldn't
exist
is
very
dangerous
practice.
D
I
think
that
power
and
authority
will
always
exist
and
if
we
act
like
it
doesn't
that's
when
it
will
rear
its
head,
the
in
the
worst
possible
manner,
and
so
I
think
we
have
to
take
that
into
consideration.
That
gatekeeping
will
always
exist
in
some
aspect
of
our
social
culture
and
we
need
to
make
sure
the
systems
that
we
create
at
least
acknowledge
that
possibility,
and
so
I
think,
that's
very,
an
interesting
concept
that
we
should
keep
talking
about.
D
But
I
I
see
this
as
being
a
part
of
a
working
process
and
anybody
else
has
any
comments.
A
I'll
share
some
comments
too.
Then.
I
thought
it
was
really
so
I
I
can
see
how,
without
context
of
how
this
came
about,
it
might
have
felt
a
little
bit
surprising
in
the
in
the
form,
but
because
I
have
had
conversations
with
gideon
this
started
as
okay
he's
gonna
take
on
the
piece
of
work
of
the
onboarding
journey,
and
you
know
in
the
communitas
caller
in
a
conversation,
he'd
be
like
it's
becoming
something
bigger
than
this.
A
You
know
I
can't
quite
put
my
finger
on
it,
but
I'm
writing
it
out
to
try
to
get
my
thoughts
in
order
to
try
to
express
what
I
want
to
say
so
that
I
can
communicate
to
other
people.
But
he
you
know,
he's
a
he's,
a
big
vision
thinker,
and
so
these
things
were
starting
to
come
out
and
he
wrote
the
document
not
necessarily
to
promote
something,
but
just
to
be
like
here's,
how
I'm
seeing
it
now.
If
I
give
this
document
to
people,
they
can
see
what
I'm
seeing.
A
So
it
was
really
a
a
process
for
him
to
refine
his
own
thinking
so
that
he
can
communicate
it
and
also
consolidate.
As
eduardo
said,
consolidate
a
lot
of
the
work
that
went
into
the
onboarding
experience
and
in
the
communities
called
he
shared
that
he
really
thinks.
There's
two
parts
of
this
document
there's
a
part
that
communitas
exec
can
execute
as
this
onboarding
journey
that
we've
sort
of
been
working
on
over
the
last
few
months.
A
But
then
there's
this
other
thing,
that's
still
nebulous
and
he
he
wanted
to
get
feedback
on
it,
and
I
also
really
appreciated
the
feedback
you
provided,
nick
provided
and
and
headwater
provided
in
that
document.
I
guess
the
one
thing
I
I
wanna
say
is
I'm
cognizant
that
if
we
react
very
critically,
it
may
cause
some
contributors,
not
gideon,
to
feel
hesitant
to
speak
up
or
to
share
their
ideas,
and
I
guess
that's
the
one
thing
I
I
want
to
be.
A
I
think
we
should
be
aware
of
when
we
are
publicly
sharing
feedback
to
do
it
in
a
way
that
doesn't
feel
as
if
as
if
it's
overly
critical,
so
yeah.
I
thought
that
was
maybe
the
one
piece
I
would
share
it
it
may
it
may
prevent
other
people
from
being
able
to
share
as
openly
and
I'd
love,
to
ask.
Maybe,
if
there's
anyone
else
that
wants
to
share
it
rather
than
pass
it
around.
J
Yeah,
so
this
is
sort
of
on
I
didn't
realize
there
was
any
controversy
about
this,
or
that
there
was
some
kind
of
oh
they're
trying
to
exclude
people.
That's
the
very
first
time.
I've
ever
heard
that
I
will
say
that
I
did.
J
You
know,
give
an
initial
read
to
some
of
what
he'd
written
and
the
only
kind
of
thing
that
I'm
sorting
out
in
my
head
is.
Is
it
it
feels
a
little
bit
like
stuff?
J
We've
already
been
doing
in
gravity,
you
know
what
I
mean
like
for
a
long
time,
and
so
I
feel
like
some
of
the
feedback
that
I
gave
was
that
I
feel
like
we
need
to
to
figure
out
who's
who's
working
on
this
and
where
the
overlap
is,
and
you
know
who,
where
the
shared
responsibility
for
this
stuff
is.
We
are
dealing
in
a
commons,
so
I
can
get
that.
You
know
that
we
can
certainly
do
some
things
in
parallel,
but
I
just
feel
like
a
lot
of
times.
J
What
happens
is
hey?
You
know.
Can
somebody
look
at
this
thing
with
communitas
and
then,
if
a
big
thinker
is
thinking
big
enough,
then
they
can
touch
every
other
part
of
the
token
engineering
commons.
You
know
with
their
thinking
so,
and
I
certainly
do
that
all
the
time,
but
at
the
same
time,
just
figuring
out
the
most
appropriate
place
for
this.
So
certainly
the
onboarding
journey
is
a
thing
that
we
should
care
about.
J
We
got
started
with
this,
but
it
never
really
got
finished
that
newcomers
journey
that
he
included
in
that
is
really
also
a
first
draft.
It
needs
to
be
I've
been
saying
it
repeatedly.
It's
not
just
a
news.
Commerce
journey,
it's
a
journey
of
everyone
through
the
whole
token
engineering
commons.
So
there
are
a
bunch
of
unfinished
things
here
that
you
know
I
feel
like
just
maybe
need
to
get
fleshed
out
better.
K
Okay,
so
then,
basically
what
I
would
just
thank
you
for
is
for
clarifying
that
my
concerns
that
people
were
excluded.
You
know
were
concerned
because
I
was
missing
the
context.
I'm
super
happy
about
that.
Thank
you
and
with
respect
to
the
comments
I
met,
I
think
they
really
hold
again.
I
also
openly
apologize.
If
any
comments
were
too
direct
or
not
correctly
formulated,
that's
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
some
people
don't
communicate.
The
way
you
might
expect
them
to.
I
belong
to
those
to
that
group.
K
So,
however,
I
think
it's
really
important
that
if
we
value
things
like
the
openness
of
the
space
and
if
we
want
to
really
keep
it
open
so
token
entering
community
and
the
token
ecosystem
has
a
chance
to
really
innovate
their
way
out
of
business.
As
usual
of
the
same
thinking
that
got
us
into
this
bigger
mass
that
the
world
is
in,
then
it
is
super
important
that
we
separate
this
document
in
two
parts.
You
know
keep
the
part
that
you
started
with
in
community
test
user
journey
finish.
K
It
maybe
test
some
new
things
that
might
help
in
making
this
more
participatory
and
then
extended
it
or
really
separate
the
task
and
have
gideon
take
on
the
bigger
part,
but
then
really
get
into
it.
Because
it's
a
huge
question
and
I
really
don't
like
the
parts
where
it
says
we
should
be
assessing
people
and
it
sounds
very,
very
business
as
usual
to
me
that
would
diminish
yeah
the
value
of
token
engineering
commons
and
that
would
be
also
harmful
to
token
engineering
community.
In
my
view,
so.
K
And
this
is
as
constructive
as
I
can
make
it.
I
think
these
are
important
points
I
don't
want
to.
You
know.
I
don't
know
how
to
call
it,
but
I
want
to
emphasize
those
yeah.
L
K
C
Yeah,
sorry,
there's
a
clarification
need
to
be
made
when
he
speaks
about
assessments.
It's
a
way
to
identify
the
areas
of
interest
of
people
when
they
enter
it's
part
of
our
own
boarding
journey.
That's
why
I
was
saying
we
need
context,
but
he's
referring
to
us
says
some
people,
it's
not
about
a
good
bad
or
our
rational
aspect
or
a
colonization
aspect
of
you
know,
differentiating
people
he's
talking
about.
C
K
L
K
A
Thanks
shannon,
I
I
do
think
that
the
the
the
there's
some
misunderstanding
around
the
the
point
of
what
gideon
was
sharing
was
not
about
assessing
token
engineering
skills,
but
finding
how
to
have-
and
I
think
livia
helped
even
shape
this
wording
into
like
sort
of
self-assessing
allowing
a
community
member
who
joins
the
tec
to
figure
out
which
working
group
they
can
participate
in
based
on
their
skills
and
whether
it's
a
self-assessment
I
mean
again.
This
is
like
the
very
first
version
of
this
document,
so
it's
it's
not
meant
to
be.
A
It's
not
meant
to
be
relayed
as
something
that's
been
well
thought
through.
It's
meant
to
be
related.
Like
hey
here's,
my
you
know
my
first
draft
of
thinking
can
we
make
this
better
together,
and
I
think
that
that's
how
about.
K
A
K
K
He's
talking
about
wasting
resources
and
if
the
job
is
to
actually
finish
the
user
onboarding
journey
for
communities.
Why
not
focus
on
that?
First.
A
Instead,
I
just
want
to
add
something.
I
I
really
feel
strongly
here
that
intrinsic
motivation
is
a
core
part
of
the
way
the
tec
works
and
that
allowing
a
contributor-
it's
not
even
allowing
it's
just
it's
part
like
self-motive
like
so
intrinsic
motivation,
is
something
he's
following,
and
his
thinking
has
is
leading
him
to
other
things,
and
I
don't
think
it's
up
to
us
to
sort
of
police
what
he
thinks
or
works
on.
K
I
just
gave
comments
and
it's
up
to
him
to
and
it's
up
to
our
process
and,
as
nate
said,
I
think,
we're
figuring
out
how
this
advanced
process
is
working
for
people.
So
thank
you
for
making
this,
I
hope
not
about
yeah
my
personal
views
and
and
perspectives.
I
think
I'm
just
one
person
giving
feedback.
A
Cool
anybody
else
want
to
say
anything
before
we
close
and
move
on
to
the
next
topic.
H
So
so
the
document
talks
about
this
interesting
relationship
of
the
community
as
a
whole
and
the
working
groups,
as
focused
parts
of
this
community,
almost
like
the
working
groups,
are,
are
like
acting
on
different
fronts,
but
all
embedded
within
the
community
and
following
the
community
values,
and
I
think
this
overlap
that
we're
feeling
like.
Oh
this
work
belongs
to
communities
or
this
work
is
related
to
omega,
or
this
work
has
to
do
with
softcuff
or
we've
been
working
on
this
on
gravity
for
so
long.
H
It
just
shows
how
the
community
is
this,
bigger
piece
that
we
are
all
interconnected,
somehow
working
on
similar
things
that
are
just
manifesting
through
different
forms
and
shapes,
and-
and
this
is
this-
is
really
beautiful.
I
think-
and
an
opportunity
to
see
like.
Oh
okay,
if
there
are
this
overlaps,
how
can
we
collaborate
on
them
and
feeling
like?
Oh,
if
I'm
feeling
called
to
participate
on
how
this
is
being
expressed?
H
And
also
on
on
another
topic,
the
duocracy
that
we've
been
talking
about
a
lot
recently,
and
it
was
funny
that
we
talked
so
much
about
it
in
softcup
yesterday,
just
understanding
the
different
experiences
that
people
have
when
they
join
the
community
and
how
they
feel
free
to
collaborate
on
something
or
not
like
some
people
felt
like
oh
yeah,
it's
very
easy
for
me
to
just
jump
on
something
and
then
some
people
felt
like.
Oh,
I
don't
know
when
I
would
be
stepping
on
someone's
toes
or
am
I
capable
of
collaborating
with
this.
H
So
everyone
feels
comfortable
and
I
think,
gideon
sharing
his
view
and
his
perspective
and
just
as
all
of
us
are
sharing
our
views
and
our
perspectives.
Now
is
a
core
component
of
of
our
community
of
allowing
people
agency
to
express
the
views
they
have
and
understand
that
that
those
views
are
their
views
and
that
if
we
want
to
share
more
about
our
views,
we
also
have
the
same
agency
to
do
so.
K
H
H
It
was
first
communicating
an
objective
process
that
has
been
collaborated
by
many
people
and
then,
by
doing
that,
this
opened
up
creative
potential
of
exploring
things
that
are
connected
with
that
work,
and
maybe
it
would
be
wise,
like
you
said,
to
separate
those
two
and
I
think
we're
just
identifying
now
that,
like
there
was
a
a
bigger
picture
into
it
and
I
think
it's
good
to
encourage
gideon
to
continue
to
pursue
the
bigger
picture
as
well.
Just
like
we
are
doing
with
everyone
here.
J
Can
I
share
something
with
you
guys
on
the
screen
here?
There's.
J
Kind
of
working
on
and-
and
I
think
part
of
what
I
basically
went
from
you
know
trying
to
determine.
F
J
I
was
experiencing
and
put
it
into
a
graphic
right.
One
is
like:
are
we
actually
a
dow
or
not,
and
I've
actually
become
convinced
that
the
mandate
of
dao
is
really
kind
of
set
up
by
this
bottom
part?
Here,
where
you
know
the
the
three
parts
of
satoshi's
kind
of
initial
sort
of
dow
idea?
But
it's
also
true
there's
an
element
of
oh
or
doubt.
J
We
just
jump
over
the
middle
of
this
entire
step,
two
of
all
this
education
and
all
this
other
stuff
that
we
all
this
other
work
that
we
have
to
do
to
actually
become
a
dao
and
the
other.
The
other
thing
is,
I
think
the
idea
of
a
dao
is
just
a
new
name
for
an
intentional
community,
where
it's
a
digital,
intentional
community
right
in
my
in
my
view-
and
so
what
I've
also
been
aware
of
for
a
long
time,
is
that
there
are
really
just
three
steps.
J
There
are
four
steps
in
the
sense
that
you
know
getting
into
the
deliberate
developmental
aspect
of
what's
going
on
to
recognize
the
sort
of
larger
complexity
which
is
at
hand
here,
and
so
I
think,
if
we,
if
we
just
go
geez,
I
hate
this
centralized
thing.
Let's
skip
over
all
of
this
and
go
to
step
three
and
just
proclaim
ourselves
a
dao
by
fiat.
J
That's
just
not
that's!
Just
not
true
any
more
than
some
random
person
can
say:
hey
I'm
founding
a
religion
or
something
you
know
what
I
mean.
So
it's
just
not
factually
true
enough
that
there's
not
enough
data
to
support
your
assertion,
so
so
this
is
kind
of
what
I've
been
working
on
and
I
feel
like
we're
we're
caught
a
little
bit
in
the
in
the
in
the
middle
bit,
where
we're
doing
some
parts
of
it.
But
we
don't
have
a.
J
We
haven't
inventoried
this
middle
part
enough
to
figure
out
what
we
actually
need
to
do
to
actually
become
a
doubt.
We've
just
sort
of
proclaimed
ourselves
that
and
because
this
is
the
bandwagon
everyone's
on,
I
feel
like
that's
what
we're
kind
of
doing.
F
J
A
J
Yeah
I'll
I'll
share
the
I'll
share.
Those
in
the
stewart's
chat.
A
Okay,
cool
things
triggered
us
any
final
comments
before
we
move
on
to
the
next
subject.
L
L
It
has
really
touched
some
people
in
some
place
in
some
spaces
that
we
don't
want
to
be
touched,
and
that
is
that
happens
all
the
time,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
taking
the
time
to
to
write
slow
down
enough
and
to
not
like
rush
through
that
sensation
and
give
it
some
space
and
figure
out
how
to
how
to
come
to
peace
with
it
in
some
way.
A
Charlie,
I
hope
we
in
fact,
I
fully
anticipate
that
we
will
be
able
to
through
continued
conversation
here
in
the
stewards
as
well
as
in
the
omega
and
the
communitas
working
groups.
We
do
have
some
people
who
go
to
both
durdas
manu
and
a
handful
of
other
people,
so
we
can
also
help
or
like
yeah,
keep
an
open
communication
channel,
especially
around
this
subject
and
see
how
it
evolves
in
all
of
the
working
groups
and
all
of
the
tech.
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna
jump
to
the
next
topic
with
our
last
10
minutes.
I
apologize
it's
not
done
yet.
So
it's
my
fault,
the
distribution.
My
objective
is
to
do
it
before
tomorrow,
so
yeah.
I
just
want
to
say
I'm
sorry
I
have.
I
tried
to
start
it
a.
A
Then,
just
you
know
that
I
haven't
done
the
chasing
up
that
I
needed
to
do
and
if
I
can
do
it
tonight
before
it
gets
too
late,
I
will
otherwise
I'll
do
it
tomorrow
morning.
So
yeah,
just
sorry,
everyone,
the
orientation
party,
happens
every
wednesday
at
6
p.m.
It's
really
helpful
for
the
newcomers
to
have
people
active
in
our
community
and
stewards
present
and
sharing
perspective.
A
So
I
think
we
we
often
have
a
handful
of
us
who
show
up
there
just
an
open
invitation
for
everyone
as
well
mitch.
Just
raised
a
point
about
the
stewards
council
tomorrow,
zepp
mitch
is
not
going
to
be
able
to
join
he'll,
be
on
a
plane,
so
I
was
wondering.
Should
we
delay
this
because
I
don't
know
that
we
should
have
the
this
topic
covered
without
mitch's
presence,
as
one
of
the
initiators
for
laser
tag
and
somebody
who's
been
quite
intimately
involved
in
it.
But
what
are
your
thoughts.
F
Thursday
I'll
be
gone
until
like
5
p.m.
Mountain
time,
so
I
think
that'll
be
far
too
late
for
you
as
well.
F
F
The
problem
is
that,
like
there's
no
permission
set
up
for
it,
we
don't
know
what
voting
method
is
going
to
use
it
like.
None
of
this
stuff
has
been
figured
out
for
the
agents,
but
like
dow
voting
like
we're
not
supposed
to
be
managing
funds
with
dow
voting,
it's
supposed
to
be
in
the
comment
pool
and
like
this
is
like
lp
tokens
and
like
signing
transactions.
F
All
of
a
sudden
has
to
pass
like
10
quorum
of
the
total
token
suppliers-
something
crazy
like
that
like
and
so
we're
actually
just
making
it
infinitely
more
complicated
than
like
just
using
this
multisig.
That
does
what
the
snapshot
tells
it
to
so.
It's
like,
I
don't
know
why
we
should
change
it.
I
don't
want
to
get
into
the
debate
right
now,
but
it's
like
you
would.
E
A
Can
I
suggest
a
time
slot
of
next
thursday
before
the
tec
sprint
retrospective,
so
the
hour
before
it
would
be
five?
Oh
shoot.
Five
p.m,
shoot
it's
a
terrible
time
for
me,
but
maybe
five.
F
Yeah,
throw
it
in
in
the
stewart's
channel
tim
and
and
we
can
we'll
work
it
out.
A
Okay,
all
right,
sometimes
it's
easier
if
we
all
do
it
in
real
time,
but
I
could
also.
A
I
just
want
to
respect
everyone
else,
yeah,
okay,
so
I
guess
let
me
just
go
back
to
zeptimus.
Does
it
make
sense
for
us,
then
to
say
we'll
postpone
the
that
subject
until
we
could
find
a
different
time
to
raise
it?
Does
that
work?
For
you
too,.
A
A
Tomorrow,
we'll
come
up
with
another
subject
and
is
there
somebody
who'd
like
to
propose
a
subject,
nothing
hops
immediately
to
minds,
but
maybe
we
can
propose
some
options
in
the
stewards
channel
for
the
stewards
council
tomorrow,
the
sports
council
being
the
one
hour
discussion
group
and
maybe
are
you
around
on
friday
mitch.
A
A
Okay
and
the
more
people
that
can
join
the
better
frankly,
so,
okay.
A
And
then
are
there
any
votes
in
the
gardens
or
dow
that
we
need
to
discuss
there?
Are
there
are
votes?
I
know
for
consilience
library
is
now
live
the
te
the
teams,
twitter
and
translate
are
both
live
chewie
and
is
there
any
dow
voting
that
we
need
to
discuss.
B
Okay,
tim.
A
L
B
Yeah,
okay,
yeah.
So
sorry
like
I,
I
was
trying
to
actually
like
post
about
this
yesterday,
but
it
was
like
right
when
discord
came
down
so
so
yeah
I
I
might
have
omitted
it,
but
so
yeah
we
just
posted
the
twitter
planning
team's
proposal.
B
So
this
this
team
has
been
doing
a
great
job
in.
We
also
have
some
retroactive
bonuses
for
members
that
have
contributed
and
haven't
been
compensated
for
that
in
the
past.
So
yeah.
If
you
support
the
trader
planning
team,
we
would
appreciate
it
very
much
so
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that.
Thank
you.
Tim.
A
Cool
and
is
do
we
have
one
of
these
projects
that
are
able
to
present
in
the
community
call
tomorrow
in
the
community
call
project
spotlight
or
proposal
spotlight.
A
A
Okay
and
yeah
rewards
progress.
I
think
we
might
not
need
this
update
anymore.
I
don't
know
olivia
if
you
want
to
share
something
or
make
you
want
to
share
any
anything
around
rewards
and
when
the
community-
and
we
can
expect
rewards-
maybe
do
we
have
a
date
for
distribution.
H
F
No
yeah,
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
parameters
that
we
still
have
to
set
to
decide
how
much
we're
allocating
and
all
that.
A
Okay,
we'll
leave
it
as
a
check
because
it's
you
know
so
anticipated
and
then
the
proposal
inverter
mitch
mert,
you
guys,
are
the
deepest
involvement.
Can
you
give
the
rest
of
us
the
update
on
the
proposal?
Inverter
progress
with
respect
to
especially
the
tec,
but
also
how
the
project
is
advancing
all
right?
Okay,.
M
Yeah,
it's
got
all
the
notes
yeah
so
now,
we've
almost
finished
them
with
spec
and
we
are
now
figuring
out
like
the
organizational
chart,
the
payment
systems
etc.
M
So
tc's
position
will
be
decided
on
that
topic
like
if
we
will
be
thinking
with
mitch
and
chewie
about
what
will
we
propose
as
like
our
salary,
etc,
and
also,
I
think,
the
payers,
the
amount
of
money
that
payers
will
put
is
started
to
be
discussed,
so
I
think
it
will
be
good
to
tc
to
think
about
how
much
requested
and
how
much
will
want
to
pay
etc.
So
these
are
the
two
points
I
think
that
should
be
looked
after.
F
And
I
I
want
to
add
that
that
nugget
will
be
joining
the
team
as
well,
and
the
other
thing
is
like
how
should
we
send
funds
to
the
like
the
three
of
us
who
are
working
because
right
now,
my
idea
is
that
we
have
a
markup
and
then
we
just
send
everything
to
the
tc's
common
pool.
A
F
Yeah,
like
I
think,
like
maybe
charging
a
little
bit
more
to
like
the
proposal,
inverter
proposal,
and
then
you
know
so
that
the
tac
is
actually
generating
revenue
for
itself
by
having
contributors
working
on
it
and
then
figuring
out,
like
basically
how
the
tc
is
going
to
pay
the
actual
contributors
from
us.
The
tc
has
like
a
in
general
benefit
because
it's
it's
getting
revenue
from
the
people
that
are
in
it.
That's
working
on
this,
but
then
like.
A
Yeah,
it's
a
good
question.
We
are
at
the
top
of
the
hour,
so
if
anyone
has
to
leave,
please
just
feel
free
to
hop.
I
was
wondering
if
there
would
be
a
working
group
in
the
tec
and
that
working
group
would
request
funding
for
working
on
the
proposal.
Inverter.
That
was
one
of
the
ways
I
had
imagined
it
first,
but
I've
been
out
of
the
loop
on
the
proposal
inverter
for
a
while,
because
you
know
you've
taken
over
with
you
know.
So
I
that
was
one
possibility.
A
The
other
possibility
was
the
proposal.
Inverter
funding
request
would
include
the
contributors
from
the
tec
who
would
be
working
on
it,
so
the
proposal
inverter
is
going
to
this
will
be
a
proposal
for
the
proposal
inverter
and
I
would
think
the
contributors
would
be
embedded
within
that
those
are
the
two
ways
that
I
had
imagined
it
first
but,
as
I
said,
I've
been
out
of
the
loop.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
this
makes
sense.
F
All
that
could
happen
is
like
literally,
it
could
be
a
funding
request
from
the
gardens
like
without
making
like
a
working
group
out
of
it
with
the
manifesto
and
everything
like
we
could
simply
just
request
friends
from
the
gardens.