►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - How ofter do you like to experience change?
16:58 - Integrate polarities
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
I
love
change
because,
like
I
I
am
super
positive
and
I
always
think
that,
even
though
that
we
can
see
some
shadows
in
change,
there
are
always
like
a
lot
of
light
to
seeing
change,
and
I
am
always
super
intrigued
to
see
the
lights
and
the
different
lights
that
we
can
have
from
change
and,
like
I
always
when
I
go
to
restaurants,
I
always
order
different
food,
and
sometimes
I
have
to
admit
I
have
received
like
food
that
I
didn't
like
and
sometimes
like.
I
I
ordered
like.
A
For
me,
I
love
change
and
I
also
want
to
see
a
lot
of
change
in
in
my
society
I
in
the
like
yeah
in
in
in
the
world,
so
so
for
me
and
and
and
yeah
change
is
also
very
related
somehow
to
conflict,
because
every
time
you
change
every
time
you
grow
every
time.
Like
your
bones
hurt,
and
I
don't
know,
I
think
that
that
somehow
that's
why.
A
A
B
I'll
just
pick
up
my
whole
life
and
and
leave
for
no
reason,
I've
reinvented
myself
so
many
times
now,
I'm
just
kind
of
used
to
it.
I
didn't
actually
know
how
to
to
relate
to
like
a
single
place.
So,
like
I've
lived
here
for
12
years
by
far
the
longest
time,
I've
ever
lived
anywhere,
and
so
so
big
big
sort
of
catastrophic
changes,
moving
changing
jobs.
B
All
this
stuff
is
relatively
easy
for
me,
because
I've
had
to
do
it
so
much
it's
a
weird
thing
to
say,
but
the
small
changes
irritate
me
a
lot
more
so
so
minor
changes
in
the
environment
or
people
who
are
not
polite
about
setting
expectations
or
aren't
proactive
about
their
needs
are.
What
is
it
that
you
know
they're
gonna
do
if
they're
gonna
make
noise
things
like
this,
so
my
personal
bubble
is
maybe
a
little
more
fragile,
but
then
I
again
I'll
happy
to
just
make
big
changes.
B
D
D
D
I
can
live
in
all
kinds
of
different
circumstances,
and
I
so
I
really
like
to
to
experience
change
in
that
way,
especially
when
it
comes
to
like
different
cultures
or
countries
or
languages
or
foods,
and
like
all
these
things,
which
are
like
cool
fun,
spice
of
life
things
I
like
to
have
that
change
so
that
I
can
kind
of
like
then
find
my
grounding
within
it
yeah.
I
think
my
level
of
comfort
with
change
also
comes
from
my
ability
to
find
that
grounding.
D
So
maybe
it's
like
having
just
a
space,
that's
like
a
comfortable
bed
sleeping
area
and
a
place
to
do
yoga,
and
if
I
can
have
that
sort
of
like
foundation
or
this
like
rooting,
where
I
can
kind
of
like
go
out,
learn
new
things.
Try
stuff
go
wild
and
like
follow
around
then
still
I
come
to
a
place
where,
like
everything
is
like
you
know,
my
bed
is
organized
and
my
yoga
mats
are
right
there.
Then
then,
I'm
really
good.
C
C
I
I
do
the
same
things
over
and
over
and
over
and
over
again,
and
then
you
know
I
came,
I
got
out
of
that
environment.
Then
I
moved
out
here
to
california
and
that
all
of
a
sudden
changed,
because
I
was
forced
to
force
the
adapt
to
this
different
change,
and
then
I
became
addicted
to
change
and
it's
amazing
how
your
environment
has
such
an
impact
on
the
way
you
you,
you
know,
react
to
change
and
what
happens,
and
so,
when
I
got
out
here,
I
just
started
exploring
everything
I
just
you
know.
C
That
allows
you
to
adapt
to
change,
and
it's
one
of
those
things
where,
if
you
don't
have
that
type
of
support,
it's
very
hard
to
you
know
adjust
accordingly
and
because
you
know
a
lot
of
people,
they
they
they
get
rooted
and
they
get
into
that
manner
where
they
do
things
over
and
over
again-
and
you
know,
change
happens
to
them
like
it
always
does,
and
they
cannot
function
and
it's
it's
not
great
to
watch
so.
Adapt
to
change,
keep
changing
push
for
change
all
the
time
and
I'll
pass.
The
suga.
E
Yeah,
I
want
to
say
also
that
I
I
love.
I
appreciate
it,
but
I
I'm
trying
to
look
for
something
bit
a
bit
more
of.
What's
the
word
challenging
to
say
about
it,
you
know
what
about
change
like
when
your
alarm
doesn't
go
off
and
you're
late
for
your
appointment
and
that's
a
kind
of
change
and
it's
probably
a
disagreeable
kind
of
change.
So,
but
maybe
that's
boring,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
change.
F
What's
that
me
yeah,
I
think
differently
than
nate
my
upgrade
bringing
was
like
not
habitual
at
all.
I
changed
houses
so
many
times
in
school,
so
many
times
and
my
mom
never
managed
to
have
like
a
a
really
stable
routine,
and
I
think
I
think
change
was
a
very
constant
in
my
life
and
then
after
I
don't
know,
I
I
started
like
four
universities
and
I
moved
a
lot
in
my
whole
life
and
traveled
a
lot.
F
So
I
think
there
is
I've
been
saying.
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
this
lately,
because
now
I
have
a
house,
and
it
feels
so
good
to
have
like
habitual
things
in
the
house
and
to
have
some
type
of
a
routine
like
in
all
our
calls
too,
for
example,
and
I
think
change
kind
of
follows.
Curiosity,
like
I
wouldn't
change.
If
I'm
not
curious
about
something
or
if
I'm
not
being
dragged
towards
a
direction.
That
awakens
me
somehow.
G
Yeah,
I
think
it
I
think
the
relationship
to
change,
I
think,
depends
on
how
it's
instigated
if
change
is
instigated
by
yourself.
Of
course,
you
love
it
right
if
change
is
instigated
by
the
environment,
you
know
like
and
it's
it's
like.
Oh
there
was
an
earthquake,
you
know
it's
like.
Oh
you
deal
with
it,
and
maybe
it
maybe
it
sucks.
G
Maybe
it's
great
I
mean,
and
usually
I
I
have
this
opinion,
and
maybe
it's
like
this
optimism
like
problem,
but
like
the
worst
things
that
happened
to
me,
the
biggest
changes
that
I
disagreed
with
at
the
time
end
up
always
being
the
best
things
that
ever
happened
to
me
right,
like
it's
constant,
and
that
I
think
this
comes
to
just
understand
where
you
are
right
now
is
so
magical
right.
So
all
those
big
things
were,
those
changes
were
clearly
so
important,
otherwise
you'd
never
be
where
you
are.
G
G
Why
are
you
imposing
this
change
on
me
right,
like
someone
changes
the
the
laws
and
you
built
a
business
around
a
certain,
you
know
organ
organizational
structure
or
an
expectation
of
of
an
environment
that
you're
within
you
know,
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
there's
a
regulation
that
just
like
takes
your
business
away
or
a
regulation
that
changes
the
way
the
other
businesses
can
interact,
and
you
already
have
cemented
a
certain
like
business
model
or
something
like
that
and
then
you're
like
what
the
hell
government.
Why
are
you
doing
this?
G
H
No
thank
you
grief,
yeah.
I
also
growing
up
place
also
where
change
was
constant
like
when
I
was
a
kid.
My
especially
my
my
father
was
always
on
the
same
place,
working
right,
but
we
were
traveling
like
now.
We're
here
now
we're
there
and
we
were
changing
school
and
on
houses
a
lot,
and
I
also
agree
with
what
cliff
was
saying
like
the
change.
It
depends
on
how
it
comes
like
if
you
decided
like,
for
example,
myself.
I
never
stayed
longer
than
two
years
on
a
job
so
yeah.
H
I
really
you
know,
like
I
personally
like
to
change
but
yeah
it's
my
decision.
So
that's
great
and
the
thing
like
I
know,
like
the
biggest
decision.
The
biggest
change
that
was
not
taken
decided
by
me
was
when
my
parents
lived
to
another
country,
and
I
wanted
to
stay
because
I
was
playing
video
games
and
I
really
needed
to
stay
in
europe
and
then
yeah.
I
kept
doing
it
and
I
it
was
tough
but
yeah.
It
was
awesome
and
yeah
back
to
you.
A
A
Yeah,
that's
super
that
was
super
opening
and
I
really
appreciate
everyone's
points
of
view
and
yeah.
I
also
I
I
want
to
click
on
on
what
septimus
and
and
grief
said
about.
Where
is
that
motivate?
What
is
the
motivation
for
for
change
like
if
it's
someone
who
is
telling
you
to
do
something?
Or
if
it's
you
and
that's,
why
we
have?
A
I
I
was
also
thinking
like
on
the
scale
of
of
of
change,
because
because
yeah
I
mean
for
me
it's
super
easy,
maybe
to
change
like
a
restaurant
or
the
dish
that
I
order
but
like
for
me.
Instead,
it
has
been
like
more
difficult
to
change
from
the
city.
I
I
was
born
from
so
yeah,
so
I
I
I
relate
to
to
to
what
all
all
of
you
have
said
and
and
and
sometimes
it
and
I
I
want
to
have
like
these
two
variables.
A
A
My
idea
is
to
is
to
describe,
and
also
to
have
like
this
understanding
of
of
the
the
good
points
of
the
of
of
all
of
them,
so
that
also
we
can
have
like
even
more
information
and
understanding
and
yeah
and
yeah
and
defend
our
inner
motivations
in
regarding
the
possibility
of
of
a
change
that
affect
us
all.
So
yeah,
that's
like
my
proposition.
What
do
you
think
about
it?
Do
you
like
it?
A
Okay,
so
please
jump
is
this
document.
This
is,
is
the
notes
it's
in
gravity
and
yeah.
Let's
write
like
the
good
things
that
we
that
we
think
from
each
point
of
view,
and
it
would
be
good
if
maybe
you
you,
you
stay
from
you
from
a
point
and
you
see
a
good
thing
from
the
other
point.
You
can
also
write
it.
A
Yeah,
the
idea
is
to
is
to
write
only
the
good
things
of
each
idea,
and
maybe
then
we
can
contrast
and
like
say:
okay,
we
have
like
a
lot
of
good
things
from
both
both
ideas
or
no.
We
have
like
more
good
things
to
one
idea,
and
that
way
we
can
also
like
yeah
make
our
own
like
clarity
of
of
what
could
be
also
like
the
common
ground,
where
we
can
build
mutual
interest
and
where
are
where
are
also
the
points
where
people
feel
like
more
divided.
A
A
E
C
C
A
F
F
A
But
let's
let
let's
read
them,
and
maybe,
if,
if
after
reading
them,
we
think
that
one
of
them
should
be
deleted
or
or
like
re-polished.
I
think
we
can.
We
can
do
it.
So,
let's,
let's
pick
someone
randomly
to
talk
or
to
read
what
what
we
have
in
the
chart,
nate
would.
Would
you
be
be
glad
if
you
read
things
as
they
are.
C
Yeah
sure,
okay,
so
we
have
a
familiarity,
trust
comfort,
people
already
accustomed
to
a
certain
behavior,
maintaining
credibility,
doing
what
you
say:
managing
expectations,
people
made
payment
decisions
based
on
impact
hours,
working
a
certain
way,
consistency
of
process.
The
system
is
a
very
anti-fragile
and
can
be
changed
from
within.
We
are
following
a
process.
We
all
agree
to
participate
in
cultural
norms
need
to
be
respected,
like
tokens,
given
our
tokens
held,
can't
change
that
great
feelings
that
we
have
with
the
work
done
and
power
impact
hour
looks
more
valuable
now
than
six
months
ago.
A
What
do
you
think
about
about
this?
These
good
things?
What
what
are
your
reflections
about
the
good
aspects
of
the
things
as
they
are?
I
can
highlight
here
what
like
is
very
anti-fragile
and
can
be
changed
from
within
so
yeah,
and
I
also
want
to
highlight
the
first
one
that
I
can
relate
it
to
some
of
the
other
ones
like
familiarity,
trust
comfort,
people
already.
A
A
Yeah
so
one
big
point
and
can
be
like
a
stability
and
like
somehow
some
comfort
that
we
already
have
built
around
the
agreements
that
we
have
made
and
some
comfort
that
we
feel
coming
from
the
great
feelings
that
we
have
from
the
work
done
and
also
managing
expectations.
I
think
that
all
comes
like
in
a
great
in
a
great
range
of
like
stability,
security
and
like
yeah.
A
A
G
Yeah,
so
I
can
expand
on
that.
It's
not
about
the
value
of
the
token
or
whatever,
but
it
was
expecting.
You
know
several
people
made
decisions
about
whether
or
not
they
want
to
collect
salary
based
off
the
impact
our
system
they
didn't.
They
know
that
the
impact
hours
could
be
worth
zero.
They
all
knew
that,
but
they
didn't
think
that
there
could
be
a
proposal,
or
some
kind
of
that
would
ever
be
within
scope
to
take
those
hours
away
and
that's.
I
think
this
is
a
very
important
scope
system
where
it's
like.
G
Well,
if
we
just
say
no,
actually
impact
hours
earned
or
impact
hours
earned,
but
yeah
we're
going.
We
might,
as
a
community,
decide
to
dilute
them.
That's
that's
a
lot
easier
to
handle.
Then
then,
actually
tam
made
an
interesting
analysis
or
another
thing
of
like
well.
If
you
frame
it
like
we're,
gonna
take
away
people's
hours,
then
it's
like
the
nra,
like
they're
gonna.
Take
our
guns,
can't
take
our
guns,
you
know
it's
like
yeah,
and
this
is
just
like
human.
G
You
know
things
and
if
we
kind
of
make
the
scope
of
the
inquiry,
you
know
within
the
bounds
of
oh
yeah
impact-
and
we
just
say,
impact
hours
earned
or
impact
hours
earned.
However,
we're
going
to
make
sure
that
people
who
are
under
rewarded
get
what
they
need
like.
It's
understood
that
the
value
of
an
impact
hour
will
go
down
if
we
make
more.
G
F
F
Many
different
scenarios
of
what
this
could
happen
should,
in
this
moment,
be
considered
just
assumptions
because
they
are
not
proposed
and
formalized
in
our
process
yet,
and
I
think,
for
the
benefit
of
the
cultural,
build
is
really
important,
that
we
focus
on
the
pro
on
the
process
that
we
have
and
don't
speak
about
like
things
that
are
not
in
the
process
when
they
are
not
there
yet.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
distinction
of
like
waiting
for
the
moment
when
things
are
formalized
to
debate
the
character
of
those
proposals.
G
Well,
no
totally,
but
I
I
think
it's
worth
also
appreciating
like
scope
and
you
know
before,
instead
of
leaving
it
completely
wide
open,
creating
some
boundaries
is
really
important
and
if
we
can
just
say
there
are
these
certain
boundaries
that
that
would
make
everyone
that
would
not
allow
people
to
jump
to
conclusions
around
these
and
so
creating
boundaries.
I
mean
like
if
you,
if
you
get
caught
stealing
some
bread,
the
death
penalty
is
not
on
the
table.
G
F
I
I
definitely
agree
we
should
have
boundaries,
but
I
don't
agree.
We
should
have
boundaries
for
the
inquiry.
I
think
the
process
has
boundaries
that,
like
the
decision
making
process
has
boundaries,
we
do
like
heavily
follow
advice
process
when
it
comes
to
something
like
this.
Hence
us
having
this
call
now
and
discussing
these
things.
F
There
is
a
con,
a
contextual
process
until
we
get
to
the
proposal
and
then
there
we
have
the
decision
making
and-
and
we
have
like,
we
can
have
the
sessions
to
debate
like
we're
doing
for
the
params
and
then
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
have
to
respect
that
decision,
but
like
the
process
to
get
there,
I
think
it's
important
to
be
like
non
yeah
to
be
open.
Somehow.
H
I
think
to
take
a
decision
like
this,
we
should
delay
the
hatch,
like,
I
really
honestly
think,
like
in
two
weeks.
We
can't
take
a
decision
like
this,
because
there
is
a
lot
to
discuss
and
I
really
agree
with
what
grief
was
saying
like
and
I
mean
in
the
past.
I
remember
I
was
getting
paid
in
bitcoin
and
you
know
like
he
knew
he
was
getting
paid
late
and
the
other
guy
was
telling.
H
Oh,
I
give
you
the
euros
for
your
time
and
you
know
that's
breaking
the
rule
between
those
two
guys
and
these
two
guys
never
work
together.
Again,
I'm
not
saying
like
nothing
crazy,
but
what
I'm
saying
is
like
we
had
an
agreement
and
we
should
follow
it
like
what
is
in
the
past
is
in
the
past.
If
we
do
data
analysis
to
to
improve.
H
That's
amazing
we're
going
to
improve
and
we
embrace
the
improve
and
we
play
with
the
new
rules,
but
we
cannot
change
what's
in
the
past
and
on
my
point
of
view
like
I,
I
told
that
to
grief
many
times
like
when
I
when
I
was
doing
brent
spann,
you
know
like
getting
away
all
these
impact.
I
was.
I
really
think
that
was
not
the
a
good
thing,
but
it
was
in
the
rules
and
we
all
agreed
to
play
these
rules,
so
I
don't
know
like
trick
breaking
them
it.
H
For
me,
it
looks
like
you
know
like
if
that,
if
this
was
on
the
blockchain,
could
it
be
possible,
maybe
by
dandelion
voting?
I
don't
fully
understand
but
honestly,
like
even
talk
about
this
like
if
we
are
in
an
economy
and
this
post
is
made-
and
I
think
it
was
a
bit
reckless
because
of
the
moment,
like
the
token
price
would
drop
like
a
lot.
G
Yeah
I
mean
this
has
happened
before
I
was
very
much
part
of
it.
The
dow
we
took
tokens
away
from
the
ethereum
community
took
tokens
away
from
the
hacker
and
it
caused
a
hard
fork.
You
know
I
also
deal
with
payments
and
I
deal
with
payments
in
the
tdc
and
I
deal
with
payments
in
many
other
communities
for
many
years
and
when
you
make
an
agreement,
you
stick
with
it.
Otherwise
managing
expectations
around
payments
are
just
so
sensitive
and
this
is
a
payment.
G
It's
impact
hours
straight
up
a
payment
and
there's
certain
sensitivities
around
payments
and
like
if
I
agree
to
pay
someone
the
value
of
ether
at
april.
I
mean
then
that's
what
it
is,
but
when
those
agreements
are
unclear,
that's
when
actually
a
lot
of
problems
arise.
I
mean
I,
I
actually
feel
really
bad
for
lauren
recently,
because
I
paid
her
an
ether
for
some
giveth
work
and
then
ether
crashed.
A
A
But
for
me,
like
it's
super
great
that
we
have
this
and
and
that
that
that
we
have
this
possibility
and
that
and
that
we
have
so
many
eyes,
also
right
now
like
seeing
what
we
are
doing
and
so
so
yeah
for
for
me
just
having
this.
This
conversation
is
very
rich
and
I
think,
like
the
from
all
of
these,
we
can
have
like
an
input
for
for
for
yeah
for
this
for
continuing
this
process.
A
F
Yeah
there's
a
whole
a
whole
chapter.
She
talks
about
changing
changing
policies
and
the
institution
design
and
how
this
is
one
of
the
most
challenging
process,
especially
because
of
our
resistance
to
change
and
how
sometimes
the
cost
of
changing
the
rules
was
so
expensive
because
of
like
what
generates.
Even
if
the
change
was
beneficial
for
the
system,
the
resistance
of
the
people
caused
that
to
be
more
expensive.
F
Who
has
to
be
careful
with
us
and
the
way
we
look
into
it
and
and
as
a
community.
We
can
like
very
carefully
look
into
the
the
information
in
the
in
a
way
that
what
is
going
to
benefit
all
of
us,
what
is
going
to
benefit
our
vision,
our
mission
with
done
with
our
values
and
how
we
can
think
about
the
transformation
of
the
system.
I'm
not
like
pro
any
any
stance,
I'm
not
taking
any
stance
now,
just
like
pure
looking
into
information.
G
This
is
who
we
are.
This
is
not
an
academic
group,
that's
just
looking
at
like
environmental
points.
You
know
or
something
like
this,
a
benign
thing
we
have.
We
are
people
in
the
crypto
space.
We
have
certain
expectations
of
how
things
are
done
and
if
vitalik
said,
hey
the
ether
distribution
looks
a
little
weird
we're
just
going
to
study
it
and
we'll
see
what
happens.
You
know
wow.
That
would
be
really.
A
Better
do
this
now
than
later,
or
or
maybe
as
yeah,
that
that
the
the
idea
is
that
we
can
have
a
lot
of
legitimacy
and
legitimacy
from
the
people
within
and
also
from
the
people
outside,
and
maybe
the
same
point
that
we
have,
that
the
the
impact
hours
were
really
fair,
as
they
were
right
now
could
also
like
a
counter
argument
for
other
people.
That
say
no,
I
don't
think
those.
A
Those
are
fair
and
starting
by
by
by
saying
that
fair
is
something
subjective,
so
yeah
it's
just
to
to
stand
the
the
the
two
points
in
the
same
balance
and
and
and
like
not
like
saying
one
whole
truth
truth.
I
am
just
trying
to
like
balance
the
two
ideas,
but
I
would
really
like
to
read
the
part
b
and
I
don't
know
who
wants
to
I.
H
They
would
be
very
disappointed
if
people
stretch
tweeting
and
their
money
is
slowly
disappearing
and
then
imagine
the
scenario
where
some
important
team
leaves,
I
don't
know,
imagine
legends,
leaves
and
let's
just
say
illegal,
because
not
legal
another
observed
off
leaves-
and
I
don't
know
and-
and
then
this
like
imagine
like
there
is
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
work
to
do
from
softcup.
But
if
some
softcuff
is
leaving,
this
work
is
not
going
to
be
done
and
it
it's
very
sensitive.
A
I
mean
if
they
feel
that
that
they
don't
like
the
economy
that
we're
launching,
because
yeah
we're
launching
an
economy,
and
everyone
should
feel
great
about
it
and
and
just
with
having
some
people
feeling
that
the
the
economy
is
not
it's
not
fair.
It's
not
good.
It's
it's
just
good
to
be
able
to
to
yeah
to
to
to
to
be
open
to
to
to
see
what
what
what
can
happen
because,
as
living
says
said,
we
don't
have
like
a
clear
answer
to
it.
A
Now
we
just
have
like
the
disposition
to
to
like
open
that
pandora
box
and
see
what
can
come
out
of
it.
I
I
like
I
remember,
sam
speaking
of
it
in
that
way,
and
also
we
could
have
had
the
pandora
box
like
closed,
but
we
wouldn't
know
what
was
inside
and
if,
if
we
don't
open
the
box
so
so
yeah,
I
think
I
think
it's
super
exciting
to
be
having.
A
A
B
So
the
thing
about
the
rage
quitting
and
that
sort
of
thing
is,
is
that
if
we,
if
we
aren't,
if
there
are
certain
people
in
the
community
which
are
thinking
about
things
in
simplistic
terms,
with
this
clear
sort
of
thing,
and
then
we
make
things
too
chaotic
we're
gonna
push
them
off.
Of
this
cliff,
you
can
see
the
little
things
falling
off
and
what
that's
going
to
basically
do
is
is
create
this
kind
of
situation
that
zeptimist
is
talking
about
and
and
the
rage
quitting
and
whatnot.
B
But
the
fact
is
that
we're
still,
you
know,
dealing
with
the
disorder
and
we're
trying
to
put
things
in
certain.
You
know
bins
like
this,
and
I
think
it's
important
when
we're
taking
a
look
at
stuff
to
understand
what
aspects
of
what
it
is
that
we're
doing
are
actually
clear
and
known
and
familiar,
and
what
is
you
know,
noble
and
yet
somehow
unfamiliar
versus
the
complex
and
the
unknowable,
and
because
that
middle
part
there
is
the
disorder
itself
which,
if
you're,
just
in
the
middle
of
all
that
you're
gonna,
be
very
confused.
B
You
know
this
is
a
way
of
kind
of
sense
making
around
some
of
these
things.
So
I
think
it
would
be
a
really
good
idea
with
respect
to
how
we
deal
with
some
of
these
questions
that
we
take
in
identification
about
what
precisely
it
is
that
that
we're
doing
as
far
as
and
and
each
one
of
these
things
has
a
different
action
mode
associated
with
it
right
so
anyway.
B
This
is
just
something
I
wanted
to
bring
up
as
something
that
might
help
us
to
take
decisions
in
a
way
that
would
make
sense,
because
if
we
could
tell
which
one
of
these
four
things
it
is
that
we're
dealing
with
at
the
time
or
maybe
there's
some
aspect
of
it,
which
is
clear,
some
aspect
of
it,
which
is
complicated,
some
aspect
of
it,
which
is
you
know,
complex
in
some
aspect
of
it,
which
is
chaotic.
We
can
then
avoid
pushing
people
over
this.
B
This
cliff
between
the
chaotic
and
and
the
clear
and
that's
what's
going
to
result
in
the
rage
quitting
and
things,
and
I
don't
see
that
we
actually
aren't
necessarily
really
strict
about
sense
making
in
a
way
like
this,
where
we
can
understand
how
the
the
things
that
will
lead
to
that.
So
I
just
wanted
to
sort
of
present
that
to
you
and
what
I
can
send
you
these
graphics
later.
A
A
A
C
All
right
possibility
of
change
external
support
to
revise
our
own
models,
checking
if
the
requirements
are
fulfilled
caveat
we
have
to
align
on
the
requirements
potential
to
approve
upon
the
current
standard
efficiency,
fairness,
wisdom
and
knowledge
being
able
to
take
informed
decisions
trying
to
be
fair,
have
the
chance
to
use
osun's
principles
to
propose
institutional
change
value
more
of
the
work
of
people
before
us
use
the
scientific
models
we
stand
for.
Closing
gaps
between
people
won't
hurt.
Anyone
just
create
information,
a
step-by-step
process,
gaining
legitimacy,
creating
a
more
universal
social
contract.
C
A
Okay,
decision
making
process
having
having
a
lot
of
advice
around
this
issue
and
also
having
the
promoting
the
benefit
of
doubt
not
delaying
the
plans.
We
have
not
changing
what
was,
in
the
past,
respect
sensitivities,
around
payment
click
and
set
the
clear
expectations
we
had
the
expectations
we
had.
A
A
G
A
A
A
Okay,
so
we're
on
the
top
of
the
hour.
Thank
you
for
staying
and
they
there.
There
were
three
points
that
we
didn't
get
to
to
talk
about,
but
I
am
going
to
briefly
mention
them
just
to
have
them
like
in
in
our
minds
for
the
next
weeks,
and
is
that
we
are
going
to
keep
pushing
for
the
distribution
of
the
gravity
survey.
A
C
C
For
the
for
this
moment,
right
now,
and
then
we
can
talk
about
all
the
other
stuff
after,
but
without
understanding
who
those
agreed
parties
are
and,
like
you
know,
and
really
understanding
their
concerns
or
what
their
gripes
are.
I
I
just
you
know,
I'm
kind
of
lost
for
from
from
a
governance
standpoint.
A
So,
maybe,
even
though
that
we
have
like
two
people
that
are
leadering,
that
idea
we,
we
can
also
think
that
there
are
other
people
like
that
support
it,
and-
and
in
here
we
are
also
talking
about
some
of
the
token
engineer
pioneers,
and
we
are
talking
about
like
a
lot
of
the
people
who
has
like
done
a
lot
of
work
for
this
field
even
before
us,
so
yeah,
it's
it's
it's
like
for
me.
It's
an
exciting
discussion
for
me.
It's
like,
like
I.
A
I
see
this
as
a
field
and
like
philosophy,
and
there
are
a
lot
of
philosophers
and-
and
it's
it's
weird
if,
if
we
like
try
to
like
yeah
get
into
an
agreement
between
who
feel
which
philosopher
is
the
best,
but
what
we
like
is
philosophy
on
itself
and
it's
like
the
the
diversity
that
is
behind
it.
So
I
I
see
the
same
on
token
engineer
on
token
engineering.
A
So
for
me,
it's
also
like
an
opportunity
to
like
close
all
the
gaps
and
also
the
same
way
that
we
feel
like
very
together.
There
are
also
people
that
can
feel
that
that
that
can
feel
like
yeah,
that
that
the
system
was
not
fair
for
them,
so
yeah.
I
think
that
it's
important
for
us
to
to
listen
to
everyone
and
that
we
have
this
science
that
we
are
standing
for
and
and
that
uses
data
science
and
we
have
data
scientists.
So
it's
like
hey.
If,
if,
if
we
have
chefs,
why?
A
There
are
some
people
that
that
that
feel
like
it,
but
they're,
but
the,
but
the
people
that
feel
like
that
is
not
is
not
voicing
it
out
and
there
are
only
like
one
people
voicing
voicing
it
out.
But
I
feel
that
the
though
those
people
that
are
voicing
it
out
also
represent
some
people
who
is
not
voicing
it
out.
But
that,
like
somehow
feel
like
that.