►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - What's conflict?
09:21 - Review gravity forum post draft
16:00 - Gravity open call for training and selection process
17:45- Exigences and requirements
25:26 - Graduated sanctions
32:00 - Github epics
36:40 - Protocol for calls
43:07 - TEC code of conduct
54:41 - Closing
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
And
I
think
that
conflict
is
natural
to
to
every
social
and
structure.
And
I
think
that
it's
not
bad.
But
it's
definitely
something
that
we
should
manage
because
of
this
energy
that
drives
for
conflict.
If
it's
well
channeled,
it
can
be
used
for
create
something
good
or
for
create
something
and
to
evolve
from
the
first
stage
from
where
we
came
from.
A
B
Sorry
exactly
yes,
yeah
following
the
tonality
of
energy,
I
think
that
conflict
is
opposition
of
sorts.
I
like
that
as
energy
needs
to
change,
the
change
must
come
for
some
interaction
of
sorts
and
a
simple
interaction
can
be
the
opposite
of
whatever
you
are
feeling
so
for
something
to
change.
It
needs
something
outsider
or
some
something
that
interacts
with
you.
That
makes
you
change
your
current
state
and
I
think
conflict
is
needed
for
many
or
either
or
any
current
change
in
energies,
so
yeah.
C
C
So
I
think
is
this:
is
this
balance
between
projections
and
reflections
that
like
when?
Are
we
using
the
other
just
to
as
a
screen
to
project
our
reality,
and
when
are
we
allowing
the
other
to
be
a
mirror
and
to
like
see
see
in
them
a
reflection
of
us
and
and
if
this
reflection
is
coming
in
a
noisy
way?
C
D
E
A
Okay,
I
really
like
everyone's
answers.
Also
about
what
levy
said.
I
remember
I
read
a
philosopher
named
emmanuel
levinas
that
he
talked
about
how
we
see
ourselves
in
the
reflection
of
on
of
the
eyes
of
the
other
and
that
that
is
really
important
and
also
like
she
was
saying
of
conflict
as
misunderstandings
with
another
person,
but
we
can
also
have
inner
conflicts
conflicts
with
ourselves.
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
A
A
Yeah,
I'm
putting
on
the
forum
so
that
everyone
can
like
know
what
we
are
trying
to
do
and,
as
most
of
you
have
already
come
to
these
meetings,
what
we
are
trying
to
have
is
a
group
of
people
to
address
conflict
in
the
organization
in
the
most
strategic
and
beneficial
way
we
can
have,
and
for
that
they
will
have
a
responsibility
as
individuals
and
and
also
as
a
collective
and
they
as
individuals
they
will.
They
would
have
to
provide
adr.
That
is
alternative
dispute
resolution.
A
Okay,
so
the
idea
is
to
actively
prevent
conflict
to
recognize
boundaries
and
areas
of
potential
conflict
to
promote
dialogue
in
all
levels.
Inside
the
community,
we
proposed
that
the
group
of
of
gravity
should
have
some
admin
powers,
because
they
would
have
a
responsibility
towards
withdrawing
mission,
voting
non
unwanted
proposals.
A
They
should
will
have
responsibility
of
muting
certain
people
in
in
the
server,
maybe
they're
spamming,
or
to
like
ban
people
from
the
server.
If
that
is
one
of
the
graduate
sanctions
that
we
that
we're
going
to
apply
so
that
I
think
that
is
important
for
this
role
yeah
and
they
will
promote
community
resilience
and
commit
to
participation
and
respect
even
with
the
people.
We
have
conflicts
because
we
don't
want
to
antagonize
anyone.
A
Initially,
we
have
the
type
form.
That
is
the
ways
that
our
community
can
apply
mutual
monitoring,
but,
as
lydia
said,
I
think
that
we
can
have
a
brainstorm
on
what
could
be
other
mutual
during
rituals
or
procedures
that
we
would
have
inside
the
community,
because
this
is
only
one
and
the
idea,
one
like
access
input.
A
Influence
between
all
the
different
groups
and
and
yeah,
the
idea
of
gravity
is
not
to
be
just
one
working
working
in
a
specific
issue,
but
it's
a
working
group
whose
mission
is
to
ease
the
work
of
all
working
groups
and
also
to
provide
trust
and
to
in
the
organization
and
to
work
for
the
organization.
So
yeah,
that's
the
idea.
A
So
for
that
I
I
am.
I
want
to
open
an
open
and
inclusive
process
where
every
member
of
the
community
can
put
their
name
in
a
spreadsheet
that
will
enable
them
to
be
part
of
the
training
of
mediators
in
the
organization,
and
I
I
invite
you,
if
you
want
to
be
part
of
this
of
this
initiative,
to
put
your
name
in
the
in
this
document.
A
And
I
think
that
I
have
like
an
initial
proposal
of
topics
that
I
would
like
to
discuss
in
this
in
this
training
and
selection
process.
But
I
would
also
love
to
receive
feedback
on
what
can
be
some
topics
that
that
we
can
add
into
this
agenda
to
make
it
a
very
inclusive
and
a
very
fast
but
very
practical
course
for
mediators.
A
And
I
am
also
proposing
that
this
group
of
people
should
also
have
additional
exigencies
that
are
required
to
join
and
stay
in
the
collective
additional
existences
than
the
normal
existences
of
a
contributor
or
a
steroid
or
yeah.
The
different
roles
of
on
the
organization-
and
I
took
these
eight
like
exigencies
from
my
own
interpretation
of
the
diverse
manuals
on
alternative
dispute
resolution
and
it
basically.
A
So
what
I'm
trying
to
say
here
on
this
fourth
principle
is
that
maybe
if
there
is
a
conflict
in
tech
spec
I
mean-
and
maybe
I
am
not
so
competent
in
the
tech
spec.
Maybe
I
can
help
in
the
in
the
adr,
but
I
am
not
competent
in
understanding
certain
specific
topics,
so
maybe
an
advisory
process
should
be
like
called
or
if
there
is
another
mediator
in
the
organization
who
has
more
competence
than
me
inside
the
topic
that
that
of
that
case
should
be
addressed
to
them.
A
The
fifth
principle
is
confidentiality.
I
think
this
is
really
important,
because
the
other
day
I
I
told
my
brother,
my
my
oldest
brother,
what
I
was
trying
to
do-
and
he
told
me
like
hey,
but
you
you
have
to
try
that
there
is
no
gossip
about
what
you
are
trying
to
to
do
and
and
he's
right.
I
mean
this.
This
is
really
sensitive
topics,
and
this
is
not
a
gossip
club
where,
where
people
it's
like
hey,
I
want
to
hear
what
are
the
conflicts
of
of
the
organization.
A
Everyone
should
be
confidential
about
the
information
that
we
handle
in
the
internal
in
this
group
and
the
cases
that
individually,
a
mediator
would
would
have
to
work
on.
So
it
is
very
important
and
if
a
person
from
the
gravity
group
violates
any
of
these
principles,
he
could
be
removed
from
the
group
like.
If
I
don't
know,
if
septimus
confit
has
confidence
with
me
to
tell
me
about
a
sensitive
topic,
and
then
I
like
talk
it
in
a
public
meeting.
A
A
Initially,
libya
told
me
that
each
year
was
too
long
for
our
community
and
that
we
could
have
like
twice
or
three
times
a
year
and
yeah
that
that
is
left
for
the
community
to
decide.
Also,
as
we
have
a
type
form
and
the
information
type
form
is
even
more
confidential
that
the
one
that
we
should
handle
in
the
gravity
group,
I
am
proposing
that
we
have
three
levels
of
confidentiality
inside
the
gravity
group.
A
I
mean
if
we,
if
we
open
a
case
of
adr-
and
I
say
like
libya
is-
is
the
the
mediator
and
the
stakeholders
are
mateo
and
septimus.
The
the
conversations
between
libya,
mateo
and
sept
are
confidential
to
themselves.
The
only
thing
that
we
can
like
that.
We
should
remain
of
that.
Information
in
our
database
is
up
the
information
of
a
possible
agreement
or
not
due
to
the
mediation
process
for
for
follow-up
and
accountability,
and
then
there
should
be
another
confidentiality.
A
That
is
that
only
three
members
of
the
gravity
group
are
able
to
see
the
raw
input
that
comes
from
the
community
and
their
duty.
The
beauty
of
those
three
members
that
see
the
raw
input
is
to
transform
that
input
into
cases
that
can
be
assigned
to
a
gravity
member
to
facilitate,
so
I
mean
in
the
in
the
type
form
it
says.
A
A
Member
and
I
I
am
proposing
that
this
group
should
also
have
us
as
a
collective
responsibility,
the
the
implementation
of
broadband
sanctions
and
that
they
should
do
this
through
a
botting
voting
mechanism
inside
the
gravity
group,
where
the
gravity
group
can
be
responsible
as
a
group
for
the
decisions
that
that
we're
taking
into
implementation
of
of
the
sanctions
yeah.
This
is
the
other
thing:
admin
capabilities
in
some
systems
of
communication
and
that
we
we
want
also
to
implement
a
protocol
regarding
calls.
A
But
this
is
one
of
the
next
topics
in
the
agenda,
so
we
can
go
into
it
after
that
is
basically
to
appoint
a
moderator
and
a
data
for
each
call
so
that
we
can
follow
the
agenda.
So
we
can
also
have
ease
the
the
work
of
the
facilitator,
because
we've
seen
in
many
calls
that
the
facilitator
also
plays
the
role
of
the
moderator
and
if
anyone
is
spamming
or
disturbing,
the
conversation
is
the
same
facilitator.
A
Who
is
like
explaining
what
is
happening,
and
I
think
that
it
would
be
really
easy
and
and
good
to
have
a
moderator
in
in
each
call.
So
like
the
big
idea
that
I
have
is
that
after
the
training
sessions,
we
can
have
seven
eight
or
nine
people
trained
in
this.
That
can
be
the
gravity
group
and
that
that
people
can
divide
the
moderation
of
different
calls
and
also
it
would
be
really
nice
that
there
is
a
representant
of
each
working
group
inside
the
gravity
group.
A
A
I
think
that
would
be
ideal
to
have
a
representation
of
of
each
group
inside
the
gravity
group
but
different
from
the
steroid,
because
this
also
helps
to
have
checks
and
balances
and
also
because
I
am
trying
to
propose
that
the
gravity
group
like
has
a
a
certain
deep
relation
with
the
steroids
group,
so
that
there
can
be
like
mutual
accountability
between
them
as
well,
because
if
no
one
watches
on
the
gravity
group,
then
they
would
have
too
much
power
and
we
are
creating
checks
and
balances.
Here.
A
C
C
What
are
people
learning
in
this
course?
Is
there
any
prerequisites
or
not
when
they
come
out
of
it?
What
is
the
expectations
and
then
that
feeds
back
into
the
roles
and
and
then
beyond
this
all
to
have
a
process
for
managing
conflicts
and
the
graduated
graduate
extinctions
for
each
type
of
conflict,
and
that
I
feel
like
it's
already
more
or
less
scoped
out,
and
I
think
it's
just
about
organizing
into
like
these
are
the
possible
conflicts
that
we
could
come
up
with
already
like.
C
We
can
continue
improving
this
list
and
those
are
the
graduate
extensions
that
we
suggest
using
for
each
one
of
these
cases,
and
then
maybe
this
would
be
like
a
study
of
the
course,
like.
Maybe
part
of
the
course
would
be
like,
let's
go
into
each
one
of
those
possibilities
and
understand
how
we
would
solve
this
conflict
based
on
like
what
we
have
and
and
what
is
concrete,
concretely
happening
so
yeah.
My
suggestion
is
just
to
really
like
divide
all
of
this
document
and
all
of
the
work
that
has
been
done
so
far
into.
A
A
A
Okay,
then,
that
is
something
that
I
will
do.
I
will
write
the
three
posts
related
to
the
epics
and
I
will
also
like
relate
copy
the
links
of
of
the
github
issues
related
to
to
each
like
topic,
because
because
I
think
that
I
have
like
the
the
issues
and
the
epic
in
discord,
but
I
haven't
like
connected
it
that
much
with
the
work
with
this
with
this
work,
so
it
would
be
nice
to
have
that.
A
Okay,
but
I
will
divide
this
into
three
into
three
points
with
that.
I
would
I
want
that
to
pass
to
the
next
point
of
the
agenda,
and
I
think
that
it
was
the
open
call
for
media
training.
What
do
you
think
about
that?
Do
you
think
that
we
should
like
have
this
open
call
opened
already
or
that
we
should
wait
a
little
bit
when
it
when,
when,
like
we
have
more
profiled?
A
C
C
I
don't
know,
have
at
least
something
to
present
to
this
open
call,
because
then
we
can
make
it
broader,
like
not
only
for
our
immediate
community,
like
people
that
have
been
coming
to
all
of
the
calls,
but
I
don't
know,
coordinate
with
the
comms
team
and
make
a
tweet
about
it
and
have
like
a
reach,
because
I
think
a
lot
of
people
might
be
interested
about
it.
But
then
it's
cool
to
have
information
about,
like
oh
I'm
signing
up
here,
but
for
what
like?
What
is
what
is
going
to
happen?
A
The
the
third
point
of
the
agenda
is
to
something
that
is
between
the
transparency,
a
working
group
that
is
a
leading
septimus
and
the
gravity
and
softcup,
and
is
that
I
want
to
propose
like
a
first
draft
of
a
protocol
for
calls
that,
if
you
want-
and
if
you
can,
we
can
try
to
implement
it.
The
first
time
today
in
our
in
our
community,
all
that
is
in
one
hour.
E
E
F
A
B
Is
there
a
way
also
to
differentiate?
What
is
private
or
not,
if
you
are
using,
maybe
zoom
zoom
use
is
just
is
usually
more
private
than
this
or
if
a
call
is
being
held
over
discord.
I
think
that
it's
public,
like
per
se
like
if
it's
over
this
score.
I
think
that
everyone
can
jump
in
any
time.
So
maybe
a
differentiator
is
if
the
meeting
is
being
held
over
zoom
or
somewhere
else.
Probably.
F
I
think
this
is
an
important
topic.
It's
like
it.
While
I
think
it's
still
good
to
do
the
voting.
It's
always
good
to
vote
on
issues
and
give
give
opportunities
like
matteo
said.
Discord
is
public.
Anyone
can
hop
in
a
human
can
hop
into
our
discord,
so
you
know
recording
it
is
another
level,
but
there
isn't.
C
F
A
A
I
think
this
is
a
very
bad
document
that
needs
a
little
bit
of
work
and
that
started
some
months
ago,
but
now
that
we
have
a
lot
more
of
contributors
and
now
that
we
are
like
addressing
so
much
of
the
rules
and
boundaries
that
we
are
going
to
have
as
a
community
that
we
can
like
review
and
update
this
document.
So
yeah
it's
important
for
everyone
to
familiarize
and
also
to
like,
be
able
to
make
comments
on
what
do
you
think
that
it
can
be.
F
What
I
would
like
to
see
is
the
code
of
conduct
attacked,
I
mean
and
attacked
and
added
as
something
that
we
make
the
hatcheries
sign
on
to
it's
kind
of
like
terms
and
terms
of
service.
There's
the
legal
piece
that
needs
to
be.
You
know
there
and
santi
is
here?
That's
nice!
Oh
wait.
No
is
santi
still
here
yeah,
so
that's
great.
F
We
are
creating
the
token
engineering
commons,
which
is
a
dow-based
new
platform,
and-
and
this
is
how
the
hatch
will
work
and
blah
blah
blah.
These
are
what
you're
agreeing
to
by
buying
into
the
hatch
or
by
depositing
into
the
hatch
and
and
then
we'll
need
a
lot
of
soft
gov
and
all
the
agreements
that
we
want.
Tec
token
holders
to
agree
to
need
to
be
in
that
as
well.
It
can
be
three
different
check
marks
or
it
can
be
one
check
mark.
A
Okay,
I
I
think
it
would
be
yeah
great
to
keep
hacking
on
this,
and
I
agree
that
it's
very
important
for
people
to
to
to
know
what
what
are
they
expected
behavior
in
the
organization?
What
are
the
rules
where
our
value
and
to
keep
updating
this
document
and
to
make
it
some
some
thing
that
we
can
like
call
to,
if
anything
happens,
and
also
how
can
people
like
sign
it?
F
D
D
E
I
just
wanted
to
say
like
being
continued
once
I
hear
my
voice,
what
I
was
having
to
say
is
like
we
can
use
the
markets
to
use
them
to
reach
our
goals
and
that's
not
that
doesn't
have
to
not
be
aligned
with
our
values.
Like
we
like
this,
I
was
talking
like
we
could
use
those
dragons
to
reach
out
our
goals
and
we
it's
not
like.
We
we're
just
using
them
like
an
object,
and
I
think
that's
that
doesn't
have
to
change
how
we
add
and
how
we
use
them.
F
Yeah
I
I
want
to.
I
don't
want
to
talk
too
much
about
this,
but
the
point
isn't
to
make
money
with
the
tc,
but
there
is
a
goal
of
getting
as
much
money
into
the
funding
as
possible,
so
we
can
support
more
token
engineering,
public
goods,
and
that
is
supported
by
doing
it
during
the
bear
market-
bull
market.
F
So
it's
not
about
profit.
It's
about
value,
it's
about
being
able
to
capture
value
for
te
publis,
but
maybe
we
can.
What
one
was
asking
is
if
there's
any
any
questions
that
can
really
dive
into
like
how
this
document
can
be
improved,
and
maybe
we
could
just
do
a
quick
round
and
give
them
support
there.
F
For
me,
I
think
livia
really
nailed
it.
It's
just
breaking
it
up
into
digestible
pieces
and
then
reviewing
them
one
by
one
and
not
overwhelming
too
much
at
once,
because
no
one
will
read
a
really
long
document
but
and
make
comments,
but
like
it's
harder
to
get
people's
buy-in
for
that.
If
you
give
a
short
focus
piece
and
then
we
can
try
to
gather
feedback
and,
of
course
during
the
community
calls,
we
can
spam
the
links
to
these
forum
posts
and
we
can
even
tweet
them
and
see
if
we
have
outside
outside
interest.
B
E
F
D
G
G
So
probably
we
need
a
communication
strategy
and
then
the
actual
program,
or
or
course
or
training
that
that
they
will
have
to
go
through.
I
would
split
into
you,
know
initially
how
we
communicate
to
have
people
interested
and
join
and
then
digest
all
that
information
into
that
specific
group.
Instead
of
trying
to
get
everyone
to
read
on
a
couple
of
sentences.
What,
from
my
personal
view,
it's
not
you're,
not
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
reduce
in
a
couple
of
sentences
all
that
content,
and
we
need
all
that.
A
If
you
have
a
friend
that
is
a
very
good
in
I
don't
know
in
in
theories
or
of
conflict.
I
I
think
of
knowing
that
she's
also
very
good
at
this
or
thinking
up
on
on
an
expert
about
non-violent
communication,
because
I
mean
I
I
am,
I
have
a,
but
I
I
don't
feel
myself
as
a
sage
in
each
of
these
topics,
so
I
can
lead,
of
course,
but
I
I
would
like
appreciate
a
lot
of
help
from
from
experts
and
that's
it
and
thank
you
for
joining
this
call.