►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
02:33 - Hatch outreach
11:26 - Deck
13:35 - Countdown to TEC Hatch
17:58 - Project Outreach
50:34 - Audit Hatcher Outreach
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
How
are
you
fantastic?
Are
we
starting
with
intentions,
distractions
yeah,
I'm.
My
intention
is
to
just
catch
up
on
how
we're
doing.
I
feel
like
this.
B
This
team
has
been
a
great
success,
so
I'm
hoping
I
don't
know
I'd,
be
curious
to
check
in
on
our
our
proposal,
strategy
and
yeah,
who
knows
maybe
even
end
early
as
far
as
distractions.
I
have
some
leftover
sushi
that
I'm
going
to
eat
during
this
I'll
pass
it
to
to
juan
carlos.
C
Thanks
grief
well,
my
distraction
is
also
that
I
am
going
to
order
lunch
in
this
call,
and
my
intention
is
yes,
yes
to
sing
and
to
see
how
can
I
help
and
I
will
pass
to
tam.
D
E
Thanks
tom
yeah,
I
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
discussed
in
this
call,
but
it
was
some
engagement
on
the
forum
with
the
hatcher's
outreach
audit,
and
maybe
we
can
yeah
just
have
this
little
discussion,
maybe
at
the
end
of
the
call
that
is
for
fun
and
as
far
as
instructions,
no
distractions
back
to
you.
A
Thank
you.
I
will
add
that
to
the
agenda,
so
we
can
discuss
it
perfect.
My
intention
for
this
call,
is
to
have
a
small
process
of
consensus
regarding
certain
things
that
has
came
around
and
just
comment
on
on
many
things
and
then
distractions.
A
None,
I'm
quite
a
little
bit
attractive
today
for
no
reason,
so
I'm
like
yeah
a
little
bit
accelerated.
I
would
like
to
leave
it
to
be
present
in
this
call.
I
will
just
text
her
briefly.
D
D
So
a
few
things
I've
been
thinking,
you
know,
we've
had
a
pretty
exceptional
pace
in
terms
of
like
hatcher
outreach
and
what's
our
final,
I'm
just
gonna
bring
up
our
account
to
see
where
we
are
there's
a
few
things.
Actually
that
I've
been
thinking.
D
You
know
92
people,
wow,
okay,
so
92
individual
sessions
and
and
it's
I'm
finding
that
it's
super
productive
and
we
should
continue
extremely
strategically
to
to
continue
to
do
one-on-one
sessions.
D
But
I'm
thinking
that
what
we
have
in
the
tec,
curate
is
actually
quite
good
for
what
we
have
we'll
continue
to
do.
Hatch
outreach
to
the
people
to
some
of
the
people
in
there
like
the
targeted
people
in
there
and
also
focus
some
energy
on
things
or
focus
some
of
the
effort
on
more.
D
You
know
I
just
got
off
that
transdisciplinary
took
art
of
token
engineering,
bonfire
chat
with
shadnam
and
sherman
and
trent,
and,
oh
god,
what's
his
name
walis
and
in
there
I
was
thinking.
I
wrote
down
all
the
names
of
the
people
I
didn't
know,
and
I
was
like
these
are
exactly
the
people
that
we
want
to
outreach
to
as
well.
So
I'm
thinking
we're
really
going
to
slow
the
pace
down
now
on
the
one-to-one
individual
outreaches,
but
make
them
more
strategic
and
sort
of
count
more.
D
So
that
was
my
thinking,
I'd
like
to
know
just
like
to
hear
some
feedback,
because
I
think
I'm
pretty
much
other
than
eduardo,
who
I
spoke
with
this
morning,
sharing
this
new
thinking
that
I've
had
over
the
past
few
days
with
I
haven't
really
shared
with
anyone
else
yet
so
libby.
D
I
don't
know
if
you've
heard
that
what
I
just
said
because
you
joined
me
because
I
was
in
the
middle-
I
was
just
sort
of
saying
in
terms
of
like
the
hatch,
our
outreach
I'd
like
us
to,
or
at
least
myself,
to
sort
of
slow
down
the
pace
on
the
one-on-ones
and
just
very
strategically
set
up
the
meetings
that
we
really
have
to
have
and
then
focus
some
of
the
effort
on
pieces
to
communicate
to
a
wider
audience.
The
one
pager,
the
infographic,
these
kinds
of
things.
F
D
A
Yeah,
just
the
feedback
from
this
week,
outreach
that
I
made
I
reached
to
a
similar
conclusion
to
tam
by
different
way,
but
it
was
basically
I
I
had
I
reached
to
four
or
five
people
and
three
of
these
five
people
basically
were
just
looking
to
invest,
and
so
the
call
was
like
I
feel
like
we
at
the
time
invested
in
this
call,
could
have
been
probably
taken
in
a
better
space
on
a
better
spot
or
for
another
person
who
probably
it's
more
aligned
value-wise.
A
So
I
do
feel
like
we
could
yeah
start
taking
care
a
little
bit
more
of
or
focusing
more
rather
in
in
the
people,
we're
gonna
on
board
as
a
hatchery
down
this
small
time
between
the
hatch.
So
that's
my
piece.
F
F
And
I
that's
two.
E
Septimus
thanks
libby
yeah.
I
don't
have
that
much
to
add,
but
I
just
have
one
concern
in
here
like
it
depends
like
if
we
bring
people
only
to
invest
like
the
idea
is
like
they
have
governing
power.
So
we
should
be
like
very
careful
with
when
we
are
doing
like
for
larger
groups,
but
other
than
that.
That.
B
B
You
know
so
like
when
there's
when
we
get
further,
you
know
there'll,
be
lots
of
people
begging
for
our
time
and
yeah,
and
these
next
ones,
like
you
know,
if
there's
a
really
cool
token
engineer,
who's
going
to
drive
the
token
engineering
commons
forward,
then
that's
who
we
want
otherwise,
like
you
know,
the
rest
are
diluting
our
hatch
and
they
can
come
in
after
the
hatch.
E
C
Yeah,
I
was
thinking
on
what
would
be
the
best
moment
to
onboard
like
small
fishes,
because
the
there
would
be
people
that
would
be
interested
in
to
participate,
maybe
like
from
the
community
of
ethereum
colombia.
But
I
think
that
that
can
be
done
for
sure.
After
the
hatch.
G
A
G
A
Good,
we
are
just
talking
about
the
process
of
focusing
on
on
hatcher's
and
rather
than
trying
to
on
board
everyone.
We
have
sort
of
achieved
that
part
and
we
we
should
be
focusing
a
little
bit
more,
so
everyone
is
giving
their
feedback
regarding
this.
Regarding
this
part,
basically,
so.
A
D
And
juan
carlos
tourists
spawn
to
you,
I
think
that
there's
still
plenty
of
time-
and
you
know
in
terms
of
like
reaching
out
to
a
community-
I
think
that,
having
some
support
materials
to
reach
out
to
many
people
like
the
deck
and
I'll
share,
an
updated
version
of
it
in
a
minute
is
something
that
will
really
help
in
terms
of
like
having
information
that
we
could
share
to
large
groups
right,
like
stand-alone
information,
really
that
doesn't
need
to
explain
but
be
explained
by
myself
or
olivia
or
griff,
or
eduardo
or
juan
carl
or
yourself
so
yeah.
D
D
This
could
be,
you
know,
started
this
one
pager
idea,
it's
like
we
can
just
share
this
one
pager
instead
of
you
know
for
for
a
lot
of
these,
I
think
that
there's
some
worth
and
or
a
lot
of
value
still
in
building
relationships
and
really
it's
also
specifically
for
like
the
strategic
relationships
for
the
tec
and
not
excluding
anyone
but
also
spending
the
time
and
effort
in
a
directed
place
towards
the
goal
and
not
diffusing
that
energy.
D
For
for
the
people
in
our
team-
and
I
want
to
say
one
other
thing-
I
just
checked
92
hatchers
and
390
in
soft
commits.
So
like
said,
I
think
we've
done
really
well
and
we've
done
really
well
there.
D
I
also
eduardo
had
a
nice
idea
around
inviting
all
of
the
stewards
to
participate
in
hatcher
outreach
sessions.
So
we've
been
doing
this
sort
of
you
know.
The
second
would
be
somebody
from
the
hatch
team,
and
now
I
just
think
any
steward
who
wants
to
come
and
join
and
see
the
conversation
and
see.
What's
you
know
what
the
people
who
are
reaching
out
to
are
curious
about
what
kind
of
questions
they
have?
D
I
think
it'd
be
a
great
ex,
a
good
experience
for
for
all
of
the
stewards,
so
in
the
next
call
having
the
evening
right
after
this
we'll
invite
anyone
and
maybe
start
posting
the
tc
curate
list
with
the
open
slots.
So
people
can
just
put
their
names
in
or
something
like
that,
all
right,
so
we've
come
up
with
some
dates
around
well.
First,
let
me
do
the
deck
first.
D
So
there's
two
things:
just
if
you're
using
this
deck,
it's
a
little
bit
updated
now
to
make
it
a
little
simpler
and
then
there's
a
new
piece
and
the
new
piece
is
like
the
phases
and
steps.
So
the
configuration
of
the
dao
has
four
steps.
Who
does
what
and
how
is
very
detailed.
So
when
you're
having
a
conversation
with
someone,
it
becomes
much
easier
for
them
to
know
what
they're
supposed
to
do
and
also
what
other
people
in
the
community
will
be
doing.
D
And
it's
the
same
thing
for
the
upgrade
to
the
commons.
Dow
I've
been
keeping
the
updated
version
here
actually
in
the
mirror
board
the
tec
visual
brainstorming.
So
if
you
want
to
go
in
and
see
that
my
latest
thinking
is
this
tec
live
is
actually
its
own
thing,
but
as
I'm
playing
with
that
theme,
I'll
I'll
leave
the
tec
hatch
deck
like
this,
where
it's
the
commons
upgrade
is
submit
vote
upgrade
tec
is
live.
B
A
Just
to
be
the
devil's
lawyers
here,
don't
you
think
that
for
like
an
open
question
for
the
ecosystem,
those
people
will
understand.
It's
not
easy
to
understand
a
common
style
than
just
the
comments,
because
then
the
progress
is
more
natural
for
them
to
understand
that
we
pass
from
a
normal
dial
to
a
common
zone,
and
then
they
immediately
get
it
rather
than
just
mentioning
it's
a
commons.
B
D
Yeah,
okay
and
we
have
some
new
dates
right,
so
we
have
some
soft
dates:
internal
only
not
being
published
externally
yet,
but
key
dates
around
what's
happening
between
now
and
the
hatch,
the
most
important
pieces
actually,
and
as
we
look
at
this,
like
the
information
people
do
need
to
know,
are
there's
two
rounds
of
votes
and
there's
the
hatch
and
that's
all
happening
in
the
next
well,
basically,
four
weeks,
five
weeks
so
I'll
be
keeping
this
updated
like
where
we
are-
and
these
are
pretty
conservative
dates,
you
know
aggress
aggressive
conservative,
I
would
say
so
like
balance
between
being
a
little
aggressive
and
conservative.
D
The
first
rounds
of
submission
and
voting
for
the
params
is
taking
place
until
the
11th
of
may
pretty,
like
high
probability
that
this
is
a
good
date
and
then
the
same
thing
with
a
final
vote
griff.
Maybe
you
have
an
up
this?
Maybe
this
is
in
the
place
for
the
update.
Maybe
the
stewards
call
is
a
better
place
for
the
update,
but
I
know
we
were
hope
we
were
we're,
hoping
to
start
the
the
have
the
dashboard
ready
for
this
to
kick
off
today.
B
I'm
really
excited
about
some
sem
and
I
have
been
hacking
on
like
how
do
we
do
this
seconds?
The
two
sliders
and
I
think,
we're
gonna,
replace
it
with
a
point.
So
it's
like
the
you
pick
your
target
goal
and
then
you
just
pick
the
impact
hour
rate
at
that
target
goal,
and
then
you
have
the
max
impact
hours
and
you
can
just
start
adjusting
the
max
impact
hours
and
pick
a
point
on
the
curve
and
then,
when
you
adjust
the
max
impact
hours
that
changes
the
curvature.
B
B
Yeah
for
sure,
by
sunday
I
mean
right
now
you
can
submit
right.
We
have
that
data
like
you,
can
still
submit
using
this
old
front
end,
but
it's
not
and-
and
we
can
basically
reuse
that
because
it's
the
same
thing
but
okay.
D
Yeah,
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
so
the
submissions
that
start
today
are
going
to
be
in
this
final
first
first
round
of
voting,
okay,
perfect
and
then
we'll
still
improve
the
ui
based
on
the
user
acceptance,
testing
feedback.
B
The
submissions
that
happen
today
will
the
outputs
should
be
the
same,
so
it
shouldn't
be
too
hard
to
just
change
the
one
parameter
for
everybody.
Just
in
the
github
issue.
You
know
we
can
just
overwrite
what
was
there
and
change
it
and
the
outputs
would
all
be
the
same.
So.
D
Okay-
and
I
don't
think,
there's
that
many
for
us
to
have
to
change
anyway
again
so
probably
not
an
issue
all
right,
excellent,
and
that
covers
everything
I
wanted
to
talk
about
in
here.
I
actually
livia.
Do
you
mind
giving
an
update
since
you
used
the
new
deck?
I
think
yesterday
did
you
use
the
new
deck
yesterday
and
can
you
give
me
feedback
on
how
it
went
using
the
phase
and
steps
because
I
haven't
used
it
yet.
F
Yeah,
actually,
I
had
a
call
with
natalia
to
go
over
other
things
and
then
also
gave
a
little
onboarding,
but
without
using
the
deck,
because
that
was
the
call
I
had
before
and
then,
when
you
send
it,
I
send
it
to
her
and
she
didn't
seem
to
have
any
questions
up
above
everything
we
had
chat
before
and
she
was
applying
to
the
trusted,
see
she
applied
to
the
trusted
seat
yesterday.
F
I
think
that
was
that
question
came
after
the
deck,
so
it
was
like.
Oh
so
first
step
is
applying
to
the
trusted,
so
I
think
that
was
clear,
but
yeah
not
not
so
much.
I
didn't
go
over
at
all.
Okay,
cool.
D
Fantastic
yeah,
I'm
gonna,
try
it
out
and
see
if
it
improves
the
experience
or
not
cool
all
right.
Shall
we
should
I
pass
you
an
order
for
a
prize.
A
Sure
so
we
have
had
this
conversation
since
last
week
with
him
and
livi
regarding
proposals,
and
we
I
tried
to
make
a
step
back
and
just
answer
the
question
of.
Why
are
we
doing
this
in
the
way
we
are
doing
it
in
the
sense
of?
Why
are
we
proposing
pre-hatch?
A
And
yes,
we
have
had
certain
answers
before
from
that
question,
like
visibility,
connection,
working
community
building
and
so
on,
but
then,
basically,
the
scenario
that
we
face
now
is
that
we
have
ten
nine
proposals
on
the
forum
that
has
received
very
little
attention,
and
so
it's
it's
this.
It
comes
around
the
question
of.
Do
we
keep
our
reaching
proposals,
or
do
we
focus
on
on
engaging
the
ones
that
already
present
on
the
forum?
A
So
the
idea
that
I
will
take
for
the
last
these
last
minutes
of
the
call
this
last
30
minutes
of
the
call
is
to
basically
find
consensus
on
on
this
process.
Whether
I
came
out
with
certain
options.
One
option
is
to
sort
of
give
advice
process
on
focus,
on
giving
a
live
process
to
the
one
that
are
existing
on
the
on
on
the
forum.
A
Secondly,
to
focus
on
proposals
that
we
think
we
need
to
have
in
the
tec,
proposing
let's,
for
example,
t
academy
angela
or
any
party
related
to
that.
Let's
focus
on
that,
rather
than
outreach,
bitcoin
grants
or
any
other
ones,
and
third,
it's
to
outreach
into
people
and
keep
doing
what
we
are
doing
so
far,
but
not
mandatory,
not
necessarily
expecting
them
to
propose
is
more
of
a
is
more
of
a
kind
of
you.
You
have
the
right
word
for
it.
A
Tam
and
I
forgot
the
word,
which
is
basically
like
connecting
networking
with
proposals
and
letting
them
know
that
we
exist
and
letting
them
know
that
happens,
but
not
necessarily
implying
that
they
need
to
propose
to
be
on
the
tc.
So
I
want
to
hear
feedback
about
this.
I
have
done
the.
A
I
have
done
six
outreach
proposals
so
far,
all
of
them
they
all
needed
to
go
through
the
hatchery
process
and
they
only
needed
to
see
five
of
those
six
wanted
to
be
hatchers
and
I
had
to
go
back
and
then
do
the
the
the
full
information
about
the
hatch
and
so
on,
and
then
also
with
the
levy
conversation.
There
was
a
final
thing
that
is
like:
let's
go
back
to
hatcher's,
let's
think
the
hatcher
as
a
storytelling
wise
as
a
concept.
A
Everything
comes
from
the
hatchery,
so
we
all
should
pass
people
through
that
process
first
and
then
we
can
give
them
the
option,
whether
to
be
a
contributor,
a
proposal
or
a
hatcher,
just
a
hatchet
or
the
three
of
them
so
yeah.
This
is
a
little
bit
of
a
rant.
I'm
sorry,
but
I
want
to
hear
the
feedback
from
this
grief.
B
Yeah,
that
sounds
really
good.
Actually,
I
was
just
as
you
were
speaking
it's
like
well,
maybe
maybe
we
should
just
make
this
a
lower
barrier
to
entry.
You
know
and
like
have
it
be
instead
of
making
a
proposal
just
like
signaling,
that
you
will
propose
post
hatch,
you
know
and
and
making
it
just
like
you're
gonna,
you
know
a
general
like
a
one
paragraph
like
intention.
B
It's
like
I
wanna
propose
to
tec,
and
this
is
what
I
would
propose
and
why
it's
important
for
token
engineers
and
just
like
get
rid
of
a
lot
of
the
extra
stuff
and
and
then
it's
just
like
yeah
just
we
just
want
to
collect
groups
before
we
had
so
that
right
right
once
this
thing
is
all
ready,
we
can
go,
and
you
know
your
signaling
support.
It
helps
us
which
will
help
you
in
the
future.
You
know
just
make
it
more
reasonable,
I'll
pass
it
to
olivia.
F
F
F
Because
of
the
confusion.
There
is
right
now
with
like
oh,
but
I'm
submitting
a
proposal,
but
it's
not
even
launched
like
when
is
it?
When
is
the
money
would
come?
When
is
the
money
gonna
come
in
people
having
plans
and
also,
I
think,
being
respectful
with
people's
expectations
and
how
much
they
actually
might
need
the
funds
and
that
our
time
frame
is
a
little
bit
confusing.
F
So
to
not
put
too
much
pressure
in
that
and-
and
I
feel
like
we
can,
since
we
have
all
of
these
proposals
now
to
screen
them,
and
I
was
suggesting
we
like
maybe
find
a
few
people
that
are
interested
in
doing
that
and
screening
all
the
proposals
and
seeing
if
you
have
a
natural
engagement
that
comes
up
like
do.
F
You
want
to
actually
comment
something
in
that
proposal
and
then
doing
so,
but
having
like
maybe
five
people
that
will
commit
with
reading
all
of
the
proposals
that
are
there
and
and
then
start
mapping
these
proposals.
According
to
those
three
buckets
that
we
came
up
with
already,
that
are
research
and
tool,
education
and
tea
narrative.
F
So
we
would
understand
like
from
what
we
have
what
is
in
what
place,
and
I
think
this
is
kind
of
cool
to
communicate
to
hatchers
when
we
are
on
boarding
like
oh,
we
have
like
a
few
proposals,
already
signaled,
to
go
to
this
direction
or
to
that
direction,
and
then
something
I
thought
I
was
important
from
talking
to
to
natalia
was
like.
F
Oh
maybe
we
should
just
be
asking
all
of
the
hatcheries
we
onboard
that
do
have
tv
projects,
how
much
they
would
need
to
fund
their
projects,
and
I
think
that
would
give
us
the
best
gauge
of
like
what
we
need
financially
and,
for
example,
the
tea
academy
said
they
need
500
000
for
a
year
of
funding,
of
like
complete
funding
for
everything
they
do
and
yeah.
D
F
Last
point
was
that
we
that
I
think
the
the
proposals,
the
idea
of
a
proposals
working
group-
would
actually
be
like
the
most
important
working
group
post
hatch,
and
it
would
be
the
the
meeting
point
like
the
place.
People
can
build
partnerships
and
like
make
connections
and
and
having
someone
like
like.
We
were
talking
about
jazz,
for
example,
someone
that
it's
like
super
integrated
in
the
ecosystem.
Already
that
could
be
like.
Oh
maybe
this
proposal
has
something
to
do
with
that
proposal
and
have
this
like
workshops
and
connections
happen.
C
Thanks
levi,
I
I
agree
with
that
last
idea
that
you
shared,
and
I
think
it
would
be
good
if
we
can
make
like
a
proposal
boot
camp
where,
like
all
the
proposals
can
like
know
between
each
other
and
like
if
they
can
help
or
collaborate
between
each
other
and
also
to
like
orientate
on
the
next
steps
and
and
those
things.
So
maybe
we
can
say
like.
C
Okay,
please
like
propose
the
last
proposals
until
the
the
first
boot
camp
and
then
we
can
have
like
another
boot
camp
for
another,
like
hatch
of
proposals,
but
to
polish
these
ones
better
like
make
them
go
through
the
advice
process
and
like
engage
the
community.
C
I
don't
know
that
that
would
be
like
my
idea.
My
take
and
septimus
did
you
go.
E
No
thank
you
juan
yeah.
I
don't
have
much
to
add
since
I
I
don't
fully
understand
how
the
parameters
of
the
proposals
work.
Like
I
don't
know
if,
like
when,
I
was
playing
with
the
comment
simulator,
I
don't
know
like.
If
we
need
like
more
than
50,
we
need
less.
I
really
don't
understand,
but
I
yeah.
If
we
need
more,
I
like
what
grief
said
about
like
just
making
it
easy
for
them
and
just
to
have
some
feedback
from
the
future.
G
And
we're
talking
about
the
projects
themselves
here,
the
ones
that
are
proposing
for
funding
correct,
correct,
okay,
so
yeah-
I
was
thinking
about
this
because
I
was
I
had
talked
to
paul
from
molecule
and
for
the
tec
spotlight
thing,
and
so
I
hope
he
can
do
it
tomorrow,
and
but
he
is
working
on
something
that
I
think
could
be
very
useful
to
the
tec
in
terms
of
kind
of
setting
up
this
framework
for
partially
funding
projects
where
they
achieve
certain
milestones
within
their
within
their
within
the
within
their
proposal,
and
so
basically,
instead
of
funding
everything
at
once,
you'd
be
fun
fun
to
you
know
you
you've
achieved
this.
G
You
get
the
funding
you
achieve
this,
you
get
the
funding
and
they
use
a
marketplace
bonding
curve
type
of
situation.
I
don't
know
if
that
could
be
a
technical
solution
that
we
could
look
into
for
later
on,
but
just
kind
of
brainstorming
that,
in
terms
of
setting
out
expectations
and
stuff,
I
think
that's
probably
the
most
important
aspect
of
it
outside
of
that
so
yeah
I'll
pass
it
on
all
right.
Everybody.
A
Thank
you,
nate.
Does
anyone
have.
D
D
I
think
we
were
maybe
counting
on
a
lot
of
this
already
being
ready,
like
reusing
proposals
for
the
get
bitcoin
rounds
or
reusing
the
proposals,
but
it
didn't
seem
to
pan
out
that
that
worked
that
way.
Actually,
so
I
think
it.
It
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
continue
to
build
relationships
with
people
that
we've
identified.
D
That
will
be
good
candidates
for
proposals
in
the
future
and
make
it
less
about
their
submitting
a
proposal
and
more
about
you,
know,
sort
of
outreach
like
tec
outrage
like
education,
outreach
and
and
helping
people
learn
about
the
tec.
More
than
just
submitting
their
proposals.
A
Thank
you
great,
for
you
want
to
say
something
because
no
okay,
so
how
do
we
libby?
Can
you
help
me
with
this?
How
do
we
then
sort
of
make
a
consensus
on
this
regarding
the
process
of
okay?
So
we
now
have
these
ideas,
which
is
basically
summarizing
a
little
bit
focus
it's
one
of
the
things
I
I
came
up
like
I
hear
from
everyone
and
then
not
not
binding
the
outreach
to
submit
the
proposal.
A
Basically,
so,
shall
we
then
sort
of
accept
that
as
a
as
a
as
a
new
role,
and,
secondly,
shall
we
then
focus
a
certain
specific
group
of
people
or
projects
that
we
know
or
that
are
not
have
been
outreach
proposal
wise
or
do
we
leave
it
like,
as
it
comes.
B
B
F
F
And
we
had
a
call
with
angela
this
week
on
like
just
a
lie.
It
was,
I
know
what
you
thought
grief,
but
I
felt
like
it
was
mostly
like
a
confirmation
that
we
are
on
the
same
side
and
then
we
are
like
propelling
the
same
narratives
and
yeah.
I
think
the
proposal
with
them
can
be
like
something
simple.
Like
you
said,.
B
The
main
thing
I
wanted
to
get
out
of
that
call
with
angela
and
natasha
about
the
te
academy
is
just
like.
Listen
like
here's
where
we're
at,
and
you
should
do
you.
You
know-
and
I
think
it's
important
for
the
proposal
team
to
remember
that
some
groups
are
looking
for
funding.
Some
groups
aren't
t
accounting
is
actually
looking
for
funding
I
was
like
should
and
asking
us.
Should
we
divert
our
funders
to
your
hatch
and
it's
like?
No,
you
should
not.
B
You
should
tell
them
about
it,
but
take
all
the
money
you
can.
Our
goal
is
to
fund
te
public
goods
and
we're
not
doing
that
right
now
and
we're
not
planning
on
doing
it
until
july,
probably
maybe
even
august,
like
watch
out,
you
know
like
take
care
of
yourself.
Like
you
know,
we
are
always
number
one.
We
are
trying
to
advance
token
engineering
and
support
the
token
engineering
community.
We
have
to
be
very
careful,
never
to
extract
value
from
the
token
engineering
community
only
add
value
yeah.
A
Agree
on
that,
okay,
so
that's
does
everyone
agrees
with
this
process
of
for
the
proposals,
outreach,
kind
of
change
of
direction?
Does
anyone
has
any
cons
or
any
pros
or
anything,
to
add
to
this
five
four,
three,
two
one
alrighty,
then
the
second
part
it's
about
the
engage
of
the
ones
I
have
already
proposed.
A
What
do
we
do
with
them?
This
is
an
open
question.
Besides
engaging
we
can
it's
not
about,
like
we
mentioned
in
our
call,
it's
not
about
commenting
just
hey
nice
proposal,
it's
about
actually
seeing
how
we
can
see
if
they
it's,
not
that
they
need
a
correction
but
see
if
everything
is
clear.
A
If,
if
it's
a
community,
how
we
can
probably
do
what
libby
said
about
or
juanka
said
about
the
the
the
camp
kind
of
thing
where
we
can
start
from
with
this
testing,
engaging
them
with
people
from
our
community
that
we
know
and
so
on,
and
see
how
we
start
working
out
this
process
of
a
small
pre
working
group
of
proposals
how
it
works.
A
The
first
step
I
would
recommend
to
do
is
what
libby
mentioned
to
categorize
them
in
between
the
three
categories
that
we
have
and
then,
from
that
point
on
see
who
align
with
this
kind
of
categorizations
and
see
how
we
can
do
certain
matches,
but
I'm
open
to
any
suggestion
to
any
other
way
to
engage.
A
B
I
I
think
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
like
surprise
these
people
who
are
willing
to
engage
with
us
and
tell
us
that
they
want
us
to
support
their
project.
This
is
like
this
is,
should
be
a
source
of
pride
for
us
and
we
want
to
engage
with
them
and
support
them
in
whatever
ways
we
can.
I
would
love
for
tweets.
I
feel
like
tweeting
this
this
group
is
wants
to
propose
to
the
tec.
This
group
will
propose
to
the
tc.
This
group
is
super
cool.
Look
at
what
they're
doing
you
know.
B
We
have
the
spotlight
space.
We
have
this
thing
and
it's
really
just
like.
Oh
wow
you're,
a
hero,
yeah
engaging
with
them
on
the
forum,
is
cool,
but
that
doesn't
give
them
value.
It
only
gives
us
value,
so
we
gotta
like
take
our.
We
have
a
platform
and
we
can
like.
If
they
propose
to
us,
we
can
make
a
win-win.
We
merge
our
branding,
we
merge
our.
We
give.
We
increase
our
network
effect
and
their
network
right.
So
that's
where
things
get
magical.
C
Yeah,
I
agree,
and
maybe
we
can
like
contact
and
the
communications
working
group
and
and
like
make
an
issue
about
this,
about
promoting
proposals
in
our
medias.
I
think
it's
a
great
idea
and
I
will
to
nate.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
one.
I
do
think
that's
you
know
the
proposals
that
we
do
have.
They
have
been
kind
of.
You
know
kind
of
left
in
the
in
the
medium.
If
you
will
for
a
while
now
I
do
think
that
we
can.
G
G
You
know
that
we're
setting
standards
on
an
equal
footing
for
all
projects
and
and
kind
of
being
transparent
about
the
process
and
like
what
we're
looking
for
and
how
we're
doing
things
and
have
an
open
space
for
people
to
ask
questions
to
to
really
engage
with
the
with
the
tec
in
a
in
a
more
organic
way
and
kind
of
slowly
build
relationships
in
that
manner,
but
even
having
a
committee
that
that
engages
with
them
periodically.
G
A
Yes,
alternatives
to
engage
with
the
proposals
that
has
been
proposed
already
and
what
do
we
do
with
them?.
D
I
mean
I
really
liked
just
olivia's
proposal
of
having
you
know,
just
a
group
of
people,
five
people,
three
people,
even
two
people-
even
just
sort
of
taking
on
the
responsibility
to
really
read
through
them,
and
understand
them
and
start
to
categorize
them
and
engage.
I
think
we
can
make
a
request.
A
call
to
action
on
our
community
call
tomorrow
to
ask
people
to
have
a
look
at
to
have
a
look
at
our
forum,
but
I
don't
know
that
that's
probably
going
to
get
us
any
results.
D
Yeah.
I
I
have
a
feeling.
The
best
way
for
us
to
engage
with
the
people
in
the
like
to
engage
with
the
projects
in
the
forum
is
for
us
just
to
start
doing
it
more
often.
A
Yes
levy,
would
you
want
to
add
something.
F
F
I
think
I
don't
know.
Maybe
we
could
even
have
like
multiple
spotlights
for
one
project
if
they
are
willing
to
or
or
start
creating,
amaze
or
and
and
also
what
grief
said
to
like
give
them
value
and
put
them
out
there
and
using
the
platforms
we
have.
I
think
this
all
sounds
like
things
that
this
working
group
could
do
and
that
we
could
start
with
an
informal
group
of
people.
D
D
I
think
that
there's
there
could
be
another
half
hour
for
a
discussion
and
for
people
to
share
their
feedback,
and
maybe
it's
something
that
is-
and
this
is
for
not
part
of
tomorrow,
but
for
the
future.
A
I
think
that's
a
very
good
idea
if
we
sort
of
make
it
a
full,
like
fuller,
full,
rounded
circle
in
the
sense
of,
for
example,
let's
talk
about
decay,
the
powerless
proposals
about
education
and
then,
during
that
week
we
feature
we
talk
more
about
their
project
because
it's
a
proposal
in
the
forum
and
then
by
the
end
of
the
week,
let's
say
friday,
we
have
a
longer
ama
call
convert,
not
even
ama
a
conversation
with
this
project
open
to
everyone
in
the
community,
so
they
can
just
join
and
since
they
have
been
following
our
social
media,
they
have
been.
A
They
have
been
seen
that
we
talk
about
it,
then
they
can
come
around
and
then
ask
and
probably
even
network
or
follow
it
up
after
the.
So
for
me,
it's
like
first
step.
You
have
a
spotlight
on
on
on
thursdays.
Then
we
talk
about
that
proposal
or
that
spotlight
during
the
during
that
week,
and
then
we
finish
it
up
with
a
conversation,
fridays
or
the
next
week.
I
don't
know
but
like
it
will
be
a
full-rounded
kind
of
civilization
that
it
goes
beyond
just
tweeting
about
how
cool
they
proposed.
A
It's
more
about,
oh,
we
actually
are
focusing
our
communication
to
build
up
this
community
sense
for
and
the
appropriate
kind
of
visibility
for
every
proposal
that
has
been
submitted
to
the
forum
and
that
probably
will
motivate
people
that
are
that
haven't
submitted
to
just
do
it
by
themselves,
just
because
they
have
seen
this
kind
of
process,
I
don't
know
just
throw
it
out
there.
G
I
was
also
going
to
say
that
even
offering
projects
like
a
space
on
our
medium
page
to
to
actually
say
you
know,
get
people
excited
about
what
they're
doing
from
like
an
infrastructure
point
of
view.
You
know
saying
you
know
we're
building
these
things,
these
tools
and
and
get
people
excited
about
it
and
have
them
kind
of
linked
with
the
tec
medium
and
have
them.
You
know
kind
of
craft,
their
own
narrative
around
their
project
and
help
us
promote
it.
A
Engagement,
all
right
does
everyone
agrees
on
trying
this
out
with
paula
is
the
one
that
has
been
more
active
and
asking
and
following
up
and
then
for
the
not
this
spotlight
for
the
next
one
nate
to
sort
of
have
this
process
tested
and
see
if
we
can
run
with
that
and
see
if
it
works,
we
may
have
a
separate
session
from
this
today,
nade
to
talk
about
it,
but
I
wanna
talk.
A
Yeah
the
conversation
kind
of
space,
so
I
wanna
know
if
everyone
finds
that
that's
a
good
idea
and
then
we
can
sort
of
throw
it
through.
C
Well,
as
as
as
gravity's
call
is
after
community
call
like
it
would,
if
we
do
that,
it
would
gravity
would
need
a
change
of
schedule
and
but
like
if
anyone,
if
everyone
agrees
that
it's
a
good
thing
to
do
it
right
after
I
have
no
problem,
but
if
not,
it
would
be
great
also
if
we
can
have
like
another
another
schedule,
but
yeah
it's
just
like
an
hour,
and
I
don't
have
any
big
concern
about
it.
D
Yeah,
I
would
second
what
you
said
juan
carlos.
I
think
the
half
hour
after
the
community
call
isn't
the.
I
think
I
suggested
it,
but
it's
not
the
right
place,
and
I,
after
that
I
think
eduardo
started.
Expanding
the
scope
a
little
to
make
it
a
week
of
highlighting
this
project
and
then
so
after
the
community
call.
The
community
call
would
end
this
normally
and
gravity
would
happen
as
normal
and
then
starting
that
friday.
D
There
would
be
more
of
a
like
a
showcasing
this
and
you
know
talking
like
making
you
know,
sharing
their
project
on
twitter.
Maybe
posting
something
immediate,
like
just
more
highlighting
of
the
project
for
a
week
and
then
later
the
next
week
having
a
special
ama
for
that
project,
which
I
I
think
that
sounds
nice.
F
G
I
think
that
you
know
before
we
we
moved
into
this
direction,
where
we
have
these
processes
for
these
projects
to
to
showcase
their
stuff,
that
we
need
to
be
very,
very
sure
that
it's
something
that
we
would
be
willing
to
fund
and
that
it's
it's
met
all
the
requirements
that
are
that
are
set
out
within
the
proposal
process
because
yeah
we
don't
want
to
get
on
board
with
a
project
that
ends
up
being
you
know,
garbage
and,
and
then
we
we've
already
promoted
it
like
15
times.
A
F
F
A
That's
an
interesting
framework.
All
right
does
anyone
have
something
else
to
contribute
to
this
idea
or
to
any
constant
pros
five,
four,
three,
two
one
all
right.
I
think
the
first
step
then
will
be
reading
them
time
proposals.
I
will
at
least
be
the
ones
of
the
two
who
will
do
that.
Anyone
who
is
in
this
call
it's
open
to
join
on
this,
but
the
idea
will
be
for
the
next
call
on
wednesday
to
have
this
filter
out
analyzed
and
see.
A
If
we
are
willing
to
move
forward
with
promoting
them
or
how
we
are
going
to
engage,
maybe
we
will
only
be
engaging
and
not
promoting
them,
but
I
think
we
do
need
this
step
back
to
fill
them
out
and
understand
what
we
have
in
the
forum
to
the
full
scope
of
it
and
then
make
a
decision
based
on
information.
A
I
will
be
the
I
will.
I
should
be
two
people,
so
we
can
contrast
reading
through
the
proposals,
analyzing
them
and
bringing
them
just
filter
them
out
and
see
if
there
is
anything
there
just
just
to
analyze
them
basically
and
have
a
result,
if
may
say
so,
next
call,
so
I
would
like
having
someone
else
to
do
it
too.
So
we
can
sort
of
contrast
and
come
up
with
a
more
objective
opinion
and
rather
than
just
a
singular
opinion
about
it,
but.
C
I
think
you
can
book
a
call
and
like
people
interested
can
join,
I
don't
know
I
think
it
can
be
like
here
in
the
discord.
A
All
righty
does
anyone
have
something
else
to
contribute
regarding
proposals.
A
Five
four
three,
two
one
all
righty
so
shall
we
do
the
forum
and
what
septimus
mentioned.
E
Sorry,
what's
happening
the
time
code
yeah,
the
idea
is
like
we
were
having
on
the
hatches
or
rich
audit
forum
process
like
there
was
some
engagement
on
the
forum
like
talking
about
like.
Maybe
this
working
group
is
going
to
be
dissolved
like
after
hatch,
so
maybe
the
financial
statement
would
it
should
be
deleted
or
yeah.
B
A
We
have
this
conversation
also,
we
live
regarding
the
the
and
ultimate
time
regarding
this
process,
and
I
think
there
was
this.
I
had
this
perspective
of
this
group
will
sort
of
become
how
you
say
this
taking
care
relationship
community
of
the
people
who
we
have
outreach
in
a
way.
A
So
it's
not
about
outreaching
people,
it's
about
taking
care
of
the
outreached
people
that
we
did
so
that
was
why,
like
taking
out
the
name
hatcher
and
changed
our
reach
to
past
tense
and
outreached,
but
yeah.
So
basically
that
was
my
perspective
about
it,
mainly
because
I
mean
a
lot
of
people
who
have
seen
the
entire
process
of
how
this
working
group
has
changed
and
then
manifesto
and
so
on.
A
I
think
it's
sort
of
coherent
that
the
working
group
sort
of
evolves
also
to
within
the
hatch
and
also
sort
of
evolve,
the
mission
since
well,
what
is
needed
intentionally
has
changed,
but
yeah,
that's
my
point
of
view.
D
Sure
so
yeah
it's
it's!
It's
a
good
point
that
we're
thinking
about
it
now,
actually
because
I
think
the
evolution
of
this
group,
certainly
the
hatchery
outreach
part
is
less
hatcher
outreach
and
it
becomes
more
relations
like
had
like
tc,
holder
relations,
who
holds
tecs.
What's
the
information
they
need
to
know
what
is
the
voting
periods?
What
so,
I
think
it
becomes
more
like
a
relationship
role
and
then
for
project
outreach.
D
I
think
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
it
earlier
that
it's
it'd,
be
you
know,
it's
sort
of
you
know
those
toys,
for
you
have
something
you
put
all
the
sticks
in
and
so
sorry,
I'm
just
lacking
yeah.
I'm
I'm
a
little
tired
today,
I
guess,
but
it's
sort
of
like
the
center
part
where
everything
else
is
connected.
D
You
know
I
think
projects
is
sort
of
like
that,
like
the
the
group
that
can
connect
different
projects
that
can
connect
people
to
projects
that
can
you
know,
support
projects
submitting,
but
it's
probably
not
going
to
be
that
much
more
support
and
also
more
of
like
relationships
with
projects
in
the
community,
and
so
I
think
that
it'll,
I
don't
know
that
we
have
it
exact
right
now.
What
will
happen?
I
think
we'll
see
how
this,
how
it
sort
of
shapes
up
and
determine
our
needs
as
they
emerge
and
I'll
pass
to
nate.
G
I
agree,
I
don't
have
much
to
add
after
that.
I
think
that
you
know
you
know
I.
My
mindset
is
really
thinking
about
like
what
everything's
going
to
look
like
after
the
hatch
and
after
the
comments
upgrade
is
happening
and-
and
you
know
it's
going
to
you
know,
our
working
groups
are
going
to
need
to
shift
and
the
people
that
are
working
in
those
working
groups
are
going
to
need
to
to
adapt
to
new
rules,
and
so
I
think
that
kind
of
having
this
general
partnerships
type
of
working
group.
G
It
was
really
important
and
maybe
even
a
a
separate,
separate
pursuit
than
the
actual
hatch
outreach,
but
that
you
know
that's
a
discussion
that
will
come
later,
but
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
start
thinking
about
these
things
and
moving
forward
and
kind
of
envisioning.
What
happens
after
the
the
commons
upgrade
I'll
pass.
The.
A
Levy,
libya.
Are
you
there
just
to
comment
briefly
the
comment
made
by
septimus:
it's
not
only
about
brainstorm
about
the
future
of
the
working
group,
it's
also
about
the
audit
specifically
and
what
we
do
with
the
funds
part.
It's
we
need
like
this
is
the
main
conversation
right
now.
It's
nice
to
bring
some
about
the
rest,
but
like
will
be
nice
to
solve
this
part
of
the
audit
wanka
any
feedback
on
this.
C
Yeah
that
I
think
that
this
group,
like
it,
can
change
after
the
hatch,
but
it's
for
sure
important
to
keep
it
up
because,
like
it's
great
always
to
to
to
be
talking
and
to
have
like
a
point
to
reach
out
when
we're
talking
about
proposals
or
we're
when
we
are
talking
about
yeah,
hatcher's
or
or
in
that
moment,
that
would
be
like
yeah
people
who
who
who
has
participated
in
in
the
project
so
yeah.
I
think
it's
it's
good
to
to
like
keep
it
up
and
to
see.
C
How
can
we
sustain
this
group
after
after
the
the
hatch?
B
Yeah
not
much
to
add
I
I
agree
with
the
framing
of
like
this
group
evolving,
but
you
know
we
want
to
live
in
the
present
for
sure
you
know
prepare
for
the
future
and
live
in
the
present.
So
I
I
also
think
that
we
gotta
focus
elite
most
of
our
time
on
on
optimizing.
The
current
situation-
and
you
know
maybe
25
of
our
thoughts
and
effort
on
like
preparing
for
post
hatch
and
where
we're
going
can't
do
we
can't
we
have
to
live
in
both
worlds.
F
I
I
thought
zap
had
proposed
a
good
solution
for
the
that
part,
the
financial
part
specific
to
just
separate
in
the
spreadsheet.
So
the
count
I
mean
so
the
zeros
there
wouldn't
influence
the
score
of
the
working
group
audit.
F
B
E
I
I
yeah,
I
think
we
should
discuss
it
also
on
this
one
transparency,
but
my
mind
word
is
like,
for
example
like
when
so,
for
example,
let's
say
edu
is
having
one
opinion
I
mean
we're
almost
on
the
top
of
the
hour,
so
maybe
I'll
save
it.
It's
maybe
transparency.
D
E
I
mean
yeah
yeah
I'll,
say
on
transparency.
I
guess.