►
From YouTube: W4 Onboarding WG: Fake interview and mission assignments
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
03:13 - Recap of the work
08:16 - Feedback regarding soft timings
12:30 - Go through people we can contact
29:40 - Forum objectives
30:53 - Round to pick someone or pass
38:26 - Forum template
42:20 - Going for a roleplay
44:35 - Fake interview!
53:45 - Closing
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
C
D
Hey
my
intentions
are
just
to
share
a
few
pieces
of
information
and
also
listen
and
get
aligned
around
our
priorities.
I
think
it's
pretty
clear
but
yeah
and
I
talked
to
griff
last
night
and
feel
a
little
more
focused
now
on
what
to
work
on,
and
my
distractions
are
that
I
woke
up
really
hungry
and
normally
I
wait
till
later
to
eat.
So
I'm
making
a
toast
right
now
and
then
going
to
get
on
my
hands.
So
I
will
be
away
from
the
computer
for
a
few,
so
I
will
pass
to
dan.
E
Hey
yeah
distractions.
No.
I
was
dealing
with
some
some
family
things
this
morning,
so
I
haven't
been
able
to
put
in
some
like
any
warriors
yet
so
that's
distracting,
but
any
intentions
is
basically
to
you
know
just
to
listen,
listening
right
now
and
and
and
use
this
call
to
sync
with
what
is
going
on
and
and
just
go
and
do
some
work
after
it.
So
yeah
I'm
using
this.
This
call
as
a
booster
anyway,
so
I'll
pass
it
to
sandy.
B
So
if
we're
also
trying
to
understand
who
are
we
gonna
have
first,
and
so
we
had
a
meeting
this
week
with
samara,
and
then
we
thought
about
having
people.
We
already
know
about
to
be
the
first
ones
to
be
posting.
Their
proposals
on
the
forum,
so,
basically
yesterday
we
had
a
meeting
with
jessica
and
and
craig
and
to
also
have
a
narrow
down
list
of
projects
and
people
who
can
be
reached
next
week.
The
idea
will
be
that
next
week
we
reach
out
projects
and
people
we're
finishing
today.
B
D
D
I
know
you
talk
to
consensus
and
then
maybe
we
have
either
a
process
where
we
each
take
on
different
groups
or
maybe
like
I
can
do
the
introductory
call,
and
then
you
can
do
the
follow-up
and
like
help
them
submitting
that
proposal.
However,
we
want
to
kind
of
like
split
up
the
work,
I
guess
is
what
maybe
I'd
like
to
hear
from
people
on
this
call
like
how
the
best
process,
you
think
will
be.
E
Hey,
oh,
yes,
yes,
yes,
and
as
a
mini
update
on
that.
Yes,
I
I
had
like
two
different
calls
with
consensus
yesterday,
so
they
had
their
bill
program
and
and
they
had
like
a
monthly
newsletter,
which
I
can't
remember
the
number
because
they
didn't
mention
it
on
that
goal.
But
it's
a
huge
number
of
developers
or
you
know
related
fields,
and
probably
we
can
get
a
mention
of
that
on
that
newsletter.
E
I
can
follow
up
with
the
developer
related
developer
relations,
people
and
but
yes,
I
wanted
to
understand,
like
the
process
and
and
if
we
are
building
the
process,
that's
okay
and
just
exactly
which
will
be
the
best
nuggets
of
the
information
or
whatnot
that
I
can
share
with
these
people.
So
maybe
we
can
use
that
as
as
an
opportunity
to
for,
for
I
don't
know
for
for
getting
other
people
aware
that
this
is
happening
and
probably
submit
proposals.
E
So
I
don't
I
I'm
not
I'm
not
100
clean
in
terms
of
the
timeline
for
sales.
What
will
be
the
ideal
timeline
for
proposals
to
be
submitted?
I
know
like
some
are
being
on
board
right
now,
but
do
we
have
like
a
soft
death
lines,
hard
deadlines,
those
kinds
of
things
and
yes,
I'm
happy
to
help
as
well
with
relationships
with
some
people.
E
B
C
Some
people
are
very
experienced
with
proposing
and
probably
don't
need
as
much
guidance
through
the
process
and
probably
are
are
very
likely
are
already
able
to
to
submit
their
proposal
to
the
forum
and
we
sort
of
get
two
birds
with
one
stone.
If,
if
we
have
people
that
we
can
tap
that,
we
can
that
we
know
are
able
to
submit
a
proposal.
C
C
C
So
we
added
a
an
issue
to
github
to
try
to
find
five
people
who
we
know
are
you
know,
sort
of
ready
to
either
copy
and
paste.
An
old
proposal
was
probably
the
best
the
best
solution,
and
I
don't
or
maybe
is
like
one
of
the
fastest
solutions,
and
I
think
that
there
are
some
people
in
mind.
One
person
that
was
mentioned
was
jeff
and
his
luna
swarm
proposal
for
one
hive.
D
Yeah
just
a
comment,
it's
funny,
because
I
feel
like
we're
really
synergized.
Even
if
we
don't
talk
directly,
I
feel
like
that's
kind
of
what's
emerged
naturally,
but
also
you
guys
simultaneously
had
this
idea.
So
it's
kind
of
ongoing
and
yeah
there
are
a
few
people
that
are
going
to
be
submitting
in
the
next.
I
don't
know
three
to
five
days
that
are
really
close.
D
I'd
say
at
least
two
yeah
one
of
them's
jeff,
because
I
we
worked
together
on
the
one
have
luna
swarm
thingy
and
I
submitted
the
proposal
actually
to
one
hive
so
yeah
we
can
easily
copy
and
paste
that
over
and
then
what
was
it
gonna
say:
oh
just
to
answer
dan's
question
about
the
process,
so
how
it's
going
now
is
we
have
just
a
spreadsheet
and
it's
like
we
have
xboxes
for,
like
you
know,
send
them.
Onboarding
information
had
a
call
right
now.
D
D
Our
main
audience
is
people
who
know
dows
and
already
know
how
to
do
this.
But
of
course
we
may
expand
our
network
a
little
bit,
but
I
think
most
like
token
engineering
kind
of
people
will
have
this
understanding,
but
definitely
open
right.
Now,
it's
pretty
like
manual
and
simple,
and
I
don't
think
it
has
to
be
so
complicated
because
our
target
is
like
15
or
20
projects
and
I
think
we
can
handle
that
manually
and
definitely
have
it
in
our
networks.
D
B
Exactly
I
think
that
will
be
the
ideal
scenario,
so
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
start
like
take
probably
10
to
15
minutes,
20
minutes
to
go
run
through
the
people
who
we
can
do
a
contact
or
can
be
reached
in
this
week
and
the
following
week.
So
if
you,
if
we
all
know-
and
we
can
all
run
through
this-
and
some
people
also
proposed
names-
they
can
be
on
the
top
of
your
head,
but
you
have
around
or
people
you
have
to
talk
to
about
that.
B
C
D
A
D
G
A
B
H
I
B
B
D
B
Yeah
the
I
saw
the
interview
he
had
with
the
with
the
institute.
They
were
willing
to
work.
They
were
willing
to
collaborate
with
us,
so
I
think
they
were
just
waiting
for
jonas
to
go
back
at
them,
so
we
can
take
it
from
there.
I
think
I
don't
know
if
someone
has
reached
them
after
jonas,
but
if
not,
I
think
it
could
be
reachable.
D
B
I
B
B
B
Easier,
let's
say
in
a
way,
without
much
of
a
formality.
It's
a
matter
of,
let's
call
it
a
little
bit
of
a
test.
Subject
these
people,
who
kind
of
are
related
to
us
in
a
way
that
we
we.
I
don't
want
to
say
this,
but
we
practice
with
them
in
a
way,
probably
to
see
what
we
what
we
are
missing,
because
the
only
other
practice
that
I
have
seen
at
least-
and
that
is
public.
It's
shown
as
research.
B
There
is
the
only
space
where
people
have
recorded
and
and
having
this
process
of
onboarding
someone
or
trying
to
import
someone.
So
I
think
it
will
be
nice,
but
what
I
do
see
here
is
that
I
see
too
many.
Yes,
it
cuts
on
too
many
jeffs,
and
I
don't
think
it's
realistic
for
anyone
to
have
this
many
people
to
on
board.
So
I
I
really
want
this
excel
sheet
for
people
to
twist
in
this
call
to
try
to
at
least
pick
one
from
this
list.
B
I
can
be
followed
by
someone
else,
but
I
really
would
like
people
from
this
whole
to
to
engage
with
at
least
someone
from
this
list,
because
the
only
way
we
will
all
be
in
the
same
page,
I
feel
so
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
want
to
take
an
exercise
of
picking
someone
from
this
list.
If
you
have
any
doubt
or
any
concern
or
whatever
we
you
can
reach
out,
but
I
think
that
will
be
the
ideal
scenario.
I
don't
know
guys
what
you
think
about.
C
B
The
easier
part
is
that,
for
example,
we
just
mark
as
bold
than
what
has
been
reached,
so
they
already
have
some
idea.
For
example,
the
research
instead
of
crypto
economics
goes
in
bold
because
they
have
they
all
they
they
got
in
in
in
check
because
they
have
been
really
already
been
reached.
So
they
don't
know
they
don't
need
the
full
interview
kind
of
process.
They
just
need
to
know
what
they
have
to
do.
Basically,
so
this
process
of
just
letting
them
know
that
the
forum
is
open.
B
D
Yeah
I'll
say
like,
for
example,
badger
dao
like
I
reached
out
to
them,
and
I
haven't
heard
back,
I
think,
because
they're
on
full-on
development
and
they've
launched
now,
so
they
probably
don't
have
time
to
even
think
about
this.
But
that's
one
that,
like
I
haven't,
really
talked
to
yet,
whereas
like
some
of
these
other
ones
are
kind
of
already
in
process.
D
E
E
E
E
I
B
D
B
B
B
B
That
is
there
if
you
are,
if
you
suggest
any
changes,
because
this
is
a
part
where,
where
it
gets
tricky,
because
probably
it's
only
the
three
or
four
of
us
only
editing
the
text
and
we
will
need
input
from
the
rest
of
the
game,
you
need
to
check
that
we
haven't
missed
stuff,
or
that
is
understandable,
or
there
are
things
that
are
being
left
out.
So
I
really
need
this
help
from
you
guys,
everyone
so
anyways
what
else?
B
I
I
would
suggest
we
go
around
round
robin
give
everyone
a
chance
to
to
say
pass
or
pick
someone.
Yes,
people
might
be
like.
Oh,
I
want
that
person,
but
don't
want
to
take
them
from
everyone
else.
I
know
I
feel
that,
but
let's
how
about
let's
pass
it
to
santi
santi.
Do
you
want
to
try
taking
someone?
You
can
also
say
pass.
F
D
F
D
D
I
I
Mean
a
lot
of
us
know:
yayla
he's
very
extroverted.
It's
okay,
I
think
santi
cannot.
I
think
we
should.
It
looks
like
I
think
dan
has
a
few
here.
So
yeah
go
away
on
the
whaler
they're,
really
cool
crew.
As
far
as
trust
lines,
I
would
say:
let's
be
picky
right
now,
let's
be
picky,
I
don't
think
that
they
have
a
very
clear
token
engineering
presence.
I
think
they're
really
cool
one
of
my
favorite
projects,
but
they're,
not
token
engineering.
F
H
I
D
H
D
D
A
B
C
B
A
G
J
Yeah
I
I'll
work
with
santian
whalerdale.
I
have
had
an
initial
conversation
with
some
of
those
guys
because
I'm
a
member
of
that
group,
I'm
not
super
active
and
yeah.
I
have
to
pass
on
the
others
right
now,
although
I'll
ponder,
if
I
have
any
bandwidth
or
if
there's
you
know
an
exemplary
one
that
sticks
out
that
really
nobody
can
take.
D
D
So
I
zargham
just
reached
out
to
me
yesterday
with
gov
base,
so
they're,
basically
collecting
kind
of
a
database
of
daos,
and
I
feel,
like
I
don't
know,
santi
if
you
have
more
bandwidth,
but
I'm
getting
a
santi
vibe
on
this
one,
because
it's
like
data
scientists
and
they're
doing
like
some
cool
stuff
to
track
dows
and
governance,
projects
and
z.
I
didn't
reach
out
to
them
yet
so,
if
you
had,
if
you
had
bandwidth
they're
data
scientists-
and
I
know
you
love
that,
so
I
just
added
them
and
they
have
just
all.
F
B
All
right,
let's
start
so,
can
we
does
everyone
knows
about
the
forum
template
and
that
it's
that
it's
every
time
you
create
a
new
topic
on
the
forum
section
or
has
anyone
tried
out?
Anyone
has
doubts
regarding
the
information
that
is
required
there
just
consider
the
fact
that
people
will
ask
you
about
it
or
what
to
do
so.
I'm
just
gonna
be
clear
that
everyone
knows
where
to
send
these
people
once
they
have
meet
with
you.
So
as
any
as
anyone
have
any
doubt
regarding
this
process,.
H
I
I
I
D
Just
some
context
too,
because
there
is
a
bit
of
a
gap
that
eduardo
and
I
were
discussing
yesterday-
that's
okay
and
maybe
griff.
I
would
kind
of
want
to
hear
your
feedback
too.
So
we
call
them
and
we
say,
hey
token
engineering,
we're
fumbling
funding
public
goods
after
the
hatch,
they
might
say
like
what's
the
hatch,
so
hopefully
you
can.
D
You
could
just
keep
it
simple
for
the
first
go
and
hopefully
we'll
have
the
forum
stuff
soon,
but
I
mean
we
will
have
a
tune,
but
the
main
thing
is
so
they
submit
a
proposal
now
and
it's
mostly
to
gather
feedback
is
my
understanding
and
they
may
ask
as
well
about
the
money
part.
How
much
that
I
submit
for
and
griff
is
saying,
leave
it
ambiguous
and
say:
go
for
it,
because
that
will
help
us
determine
how
much
we
want
to
raise
and
like
a
target.
D
So
the
first
round
is
submit
a
proposal
to
the
forum.
There's
a
template
there
and
then
you'll
get
some
feedback
from
the
community
and
then,
after
we
hatch,
they
can
edit
it
before
submitting
to
the
com
the
conviction
voting
before
submitting
a
funding
proposal.
There
they
can
edit
the
forum
post,
update
it,
and
then
we
will
I'm
guessing
have
to
walk
them
through
the
conviction
voting
or
by
then
we
will
have
an
onboarding
video
that
we
could
send
them.
H
B
No,
ideally,
ideally
by
the
next
meeting
next
wednesday
next
week,
we
have
at
least
an
update
on
on
the
reach
out
of
these
people.
That's
the
ideal
scenario.
The
ideal
scenario
will
be
to
have
at
least
five
to
ten
people.
There
is
I
mean
these
lists
are
in
this
list.
There
is
about
20
people
so
to
have
five
to
ten
of
these.
People
from
these
proposals
is
submitted.
That
will
be
the
ideal
scenario
by
next
wednesday.
A
C
B
D
Can
I
mention
two
more
things
about
the
process
that
just
also
came
up
in
my
brain?
I
would
actually
kind
of.
I
don't
know
if
I
disagree
with
the
timeline,
but
I
do
think
we
have
more
time.
Many
of
these
projects
are
very
busy
like
badger.
Now
is
probably
not
going
to
have
time
to
do
this.
I
would
imagine
we
have
really
until
the
hatch,
I
think
our
goal,
as
we've
stated
is
five.
D
C
Those
are
super
good
points
I
just
want
to
add:
can
we
identify
on
this
spreadsheet?
The
five
we
think
are
really
super
ready
to
go
like
they.
We
know
they
have
a
proposal,
a
github
or
one
hive,
and
we
know
that
they
can
just
copy
and
paste
that
proposal
and
that
way
we
can
sort
of
identify
which
are
the
ones
that
yeah
excellent.
Thank
you.
B
I
I'm
a
pitcher
I
was
just
pitching.
I
was
late
here
because
I
was
pitching
tc
to
a
dev
trying
to
get
him
done,
but
but
yeah
so
I
can.
I
can
do
it
and
I'll
just
give
it
to
everyone,
and
you
guys
can
all
ask
me
questions.
I
guess
so.
Anyone
can
pop
in
and
ask
a
question
hi
so
badger
dao
actually.
Can
I
go
maybe
to
okay,
we
can
go
badger
now,
hey
badger,
dao
I'd
like
to
make
have
you
heard
of
the
token
engineering
comments?
I
No,
I'm
not
surprised
so
we're
just
launching
a
grants
program,
that's
funded
by
token
engineering.
It's
really
interesting
and
you
guys
are
like
deep
in
the
game
and
we'd
love
to
see
some
cad
cad
models
in
in
design
engineering
around
what
you
guys
are
working
on,
maybe
you'd
be
interested
in
that.
Let's
see
problem
with
badger
dow
is
I
don't.
I
have
to
think
about
what
the
pitch
is.
I
don't
know
I
don't
know
what
yeah.
B
I
Those
I
can
do
chris,
I
know
chris,
I
could,
I
could
say:
hey
hey
chris
how's,
it
going
man
long
time,
no
see
it
was
fun.
You
know
last
time
we
saw
each
other
blah
blah
blah
and
then
get
to
the
so
hey
we're,
finally
launching
the
token
engineering
commons
and
we're
looking
for
good,
open
source
public
groups
to
fund
their
public
work.
I
So
if
you
like,
it'd,
be
really
cool
to
fund
your
research
with
the
token
engineering
commons
and
and
what
we
really
need
right
now
is
to
set
the
tone
with
really
cool
token
engineering
projects
so
that
we
can
collect
more
ideas
and
also
understand
how
much
funding
we
need
so
I'll
be
curious.
If
you
have
any
research
projects,
that
would
be
good
proposals
for
for
grants,
funding.
B
I
I
Well,
the
first
step
is
to
propose
on
the
forum-
and
that's
really
easy-
it's
just
filling
out
a
forum
post
after
that,
once
the
pro
the
proposal
will
get
debated
on
the
forum
for
a
little
bit
and
we
have
to
launch
the
actual
funding
mechanism.
So
it
might
be
a
couple
months
honestly
until
you
get
real
funding,
but
hopefully
you'll
be
able
to
this
first
test
proposal
would
lead
to
a
lot
of
proposals,
and
eventually
you
get
your
name
cemented
in
the
tec,
because.
I
You,
if
you're
active
with
this,
also
when
we
do
that
we're
doing
test
hatches,
so
you
could
test,
submit
it
to
conviction,
voting
which
is
super
easy,
but
and
get
actually
a
little
bit
of
funding,
probably
just
like
10
bucks
or
something,
but
it
would
be
it's
kind
of
us
playing
with
the
system
with
our
community.
So
everyone
can
understand.
I
You
know
I'm
a
token
holder,
so
we're
definitely
going
to
be
talking
with
you
about.
You
know
our
our
path
and
our
launch
date,
but
in
the
end
you
know
we
are
creating
our
own
economy
and
the
community
has
to
debate
the
parameters
and
these
sorts
of
things.
So
it's
going
to
be
it's
not
just
like
the
tech
gets
launched
and
then
it's
done,
but
I
am
expecting
it
to
be.
You
know,
january
february,
next
year,
probably
february
next.
B
F
B
I
I
B
I
D
I
You
just
get
the
money
when
people
vote.
Yes,
we
are
working
on
a
proposal
framework.
Hopefully
this
will
be
something
also
that
gets
debated
in
the
forum,
but
the
way
conviction
voting
works.
Now
when
money,
when
the
vote
passes
the
funds
go
there,
that's
over
it'd
be
really
cool,
though
of
course,
if
you
did
lots
of
small
grants
in
fact
conviction,
voting
kind
of
relies
more
incentivizes,
smaller
grants,
so
you'll
be
better
off
having
a
small
grant
showing
success
and
then
getting
more
and
more
funding
after
after
building
off
that
success.
D
I
I
B
H
I
B
Shall
we
keep
them
using
the
excel
document,
so
everyone
kind
of
date
on
that
document
regarding
when
you
have
approached
the
people
that
has
under
your
names,
so
you
can
basically
update
and
say,
like
hey
I've
reached,
they
don't
answer
hey,
I
don't
have
time
hey
I
need
to
like.
Can
we
keep
this
document
as
a
centralized
sort
of
place
where
we
can
update?
What's
going
on
with
these
individuals
or
groups
that
we
are
trying
to
to
submit?
E
A
quick
question
griff
well,
well
everybody
anyway,
I'm
curious
about
like
how
do
we
see?
I
mean
some
of
these
okay.
These
people
are
working
on
public
goods
great.
How
do
we
see
the
relationship
to
to
money
to
you
know
to
making
a
profit
I
mean
like
it
can
be
just
sustainability,
sustainability
aiming
for
sustainability
right,
I
guess
so.
How
do
we
see
that?
I
mean
what
what
is
a
complete?
No
a
deal
breaker
in
those
terms.
I
I
mean
if
they're,
not
the
the
know,
is
if
they're
charging
or,
in
my
opinion,
if
it's
not
a
public
good,
if
they're
saying
hey
like
invest
in
our
project,
we're
going
to
create
a
closed
source,
cad
cad
competitor,
that's
going
to
be
awesome,
you
can
simulate
economies,
but
you
have
to
pay.
You
know
a
thousand
dollars
a
year
every
year
to
use
it.
For
me,
that's
not
a
public
good,
that's
like
a
business
investment,
and
maybe
the
te
agrees
that
changes
the
model
and
they're
like
no
we're
not
trying
to
do
public
goods.