►
From YouTube: W11 Onboarding WG: Onboarding ourselves feedback!
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
03:30 - Welcome to TEC event
07:16 - Onboarding ourselves
10:20 - Swiss association membership question
13:15 - Governance during each period
24:32 - Tam explains the confusing scope of onboarding
27:17 - Goals speaking with Hatchers
29:29 - CSTK
32:15 - Being more proactive on the proposals
33:21 - Hatchers
50:12 - Closing
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
So
the
intention
for
this
call
is
to,
as
usual,
stay
on
the
same
page
with
everyone
and
to
also
have
an
update
on
the
hatches
and
and
how
it
has
been
the
morning
of
ourselves
with
him
and
jake
and
and
the
steps
that
we
are
taking
forward
and
then
my
destruction,
not
probably
the
cat
that
goes
around.
But
besides
that
everything's
good,
I
will
pass
it
into
one.
B
D
Hey
so
my
intentions
are
to
see
how
we're
doing,
in
terms
of
onboarding,
hatchers
and
onboarding
projects
to
see
where
what
our
next
targets
are
and
to
hear
from
everyone
else
in
this
group
and
my
distractions
is
I'm
building
the
agenda
now.
So
please
do
jump
in
the
agenda
and
help
me
build
it
so
that
we
we
just
have
a
list
of
what
we'll
be
doing
today
and
some
notes
from
our
meeting
and
other
than
that.
I
have
no
other
distractions
so
I'll
pass
to
jake.
E
E
A
A
A
A
I
think
that
was
due
to
do
and
then
that
eventually
led
to
a
call
we
had
an
hour
and
a
half
ago
at
4
00
p.m.
European
central
time
where
we
had
sort
of
a
welcome
to
the
dec
ama
call
with
levy
that
she
posted
a
call
praise
to
her
for
that
and
we
did
it
with
ivy
at
the
beginning.
So
ivy
had
some
doubts
regarding
difference
in
between
garden
swarm
and
why
garden
swarm?
Is
there
and
why
is
it
relevant
for
us
and
so
on?
A
So
we
walk
through
these
doubts
that
ivy
had
and
with
grave
and
levy,
and
someone
else
was
there
and
then
we
solved
these
questions,
and
then
we
decided
that
it
was
a
good
exercise
to
probably
have
the
same.
The
same
call
every
wednesday
before
the
morning
working
group
to
have
questions
solved
from
the
community,
hello,
the
centralized
cgs.
A
So
we
we
schedule
it
for
for
every
wednesday.
So
we
can
have
questions
solved.
We
can
welcoming
people
who
are
new
and
we
can
centralize
people
and
send
them
there
if
they
like
you're
new,
and
you
jump
right
into
working
and
you
have
doubts
okay
pass
by
on
wednesday,
and
we
will
try
to
attend
and
and
walk
you
through,
whatever
jobs
you
may
have,
so
that
was
fun
to
do
with
ivy
because
she
has
been
working
with
us.
Quite
like
quite
a
lot
for
the
past
weeks
jed.
A
A
So
the
next
step
regarding
that
is
to
basically
add
this
link
to
the
google
calendar.
Invite
for
this
call
on
wednesdays,
4
pm
to
people
who
are
new
or
people
who
get
get
in
some
way
into
the
tec,
so
they
get
onboarded
by
the
by
this
by
the
community
itself,
so
it
doesn't
matter
that
was
fun,
then
continuing
with
this
processes
of
onboarding.
A
D
So
it's
super
interesting
because,
since
we
started
onboarding
people
that
are
active
in
tec
and
cs,
it's
a
different
kind
of
conversation
than
people
who
really
want
to
know
more
about
the
project
and
the
people
that
are
already
active,
have
really
detailed
questions
and
and
a
lot
of
really
good
feedback.
So
I
found
it
quite.
D
D
If
we
can
maybe
structure
a
group
call
where
we,
you
know
on
board
a
group
at
a
time
instead
of
the
one-on-ones
and
just
in
terms
of
like
scheduling,
especially
my
time,
although
jake
can
handle
all
of
the
the
you
know,
the
est
and
pst
time
zones,
those
hours
for
me
and
cet
are
pretty
much
booked.
So
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
time
slots
there.
E
A
Yes,
that's
correct
and
we
also
onboarded,
I
mean
we
should
share
this
freaking.
Ask
questions
frequently
asked
questions.
I
think
probably
it
will
be
really
useful
from
the
internal
onboarding
to
have
it.
Have
the
have
that
document
ready
time
that
you
mentioned
for
the
morning
of
the
next
batch
of
hatcher's
that
are
not
ourselves.
A
So
we
will
have
these
questions
in
in
the
same
tec,
grade
or
part
of
the
document
in
the
in
the
github
issue
that
goes
to
hatcher,
so
everyone
can
have
that
kind
of
questions
answered
there,
so
they,
if
someone
has
for
the
question
we
just
send
them
to
the
link
we
also
with
jake
we
onboarded.
Yes,
sam
right,
jake
yeah,
we
did
yeah
his
nickname,
always
it's
hard
for
me
to
pronounce
it,
and
it
was
really
nice.
It
was.
It
was
really
fast
and
quick
in
in
his
questions.
A
H
So
it's
there's
no
obligation
to
pay
it
every
year
you
can
choose
to
not,
but
the
this
it
is
an
every.
It
is
a
once
a
year
payment
or
like
it.
It
gives
you
membership
until
march
31st
and
then
the
the
association
might
lower
the
cost
they
might
raise
it.
It's
it's
really
up
to
the
association
to
figure
out
what
they
want
to
do
with
the
with
the
next
year
payment.
H
H
Is
out
definitely
there's
no,
I
mean
it's
crypto,
so
you
hold
your
keys.
So
there's
no,
it's
not
like
a
credit
card,
so
they
pay
once
and
then
like.
If
they
want
to
pay
again,
they
can,
if
not,
they
lose
their
legal
protection
but
they're
still
in
the
dows
that
they
got
into.
I
mean
it's
okay,
but
it
is
a.
It
is
a.
H
We
will
contact
them
at
the
beginning
of
next
year
to
see
if
they,
if
we're
doing
a
good
job,
and
if
we
are,
they
can
pay
us
again.
If
not
they
don't
have
to
so
it's
a
one-time
fee.
There's
no
obligation
to
pay
again,
but
we
will
ask
again
and
if
they
don't
pay
by
march
31st
next
year
they
lose
the
legal
protection.
H
A
D
D
So
she
took
the
perspective
of
somebody
who
was
really
new
and
had
a
lot
of
questions,
and
then
we
also
took
time
to
to
brainstorm
on
some
answers
to
questions
too.
The
one
question
that
came
up
that
I
think
we
had
that.
I
found
it
to
be
a
little
tricky
to
answer.
I
didn't
have
the
answer
right
away.
It
was
about
after
we
after
a
hatter,
joins
the
swiss
membership
and
becomes
a
swiss
member
and
they
have
cst.
D
They
have
a
csdk
score
at
that
time.
Then
there
will
be
a
period
where
we
launch
the
dandelion
dow
and
between
that
period
and
the
launching
of
the
bonding
curve,
where
we'll
launch
tec
tokens.
What
is
the
measurement
that
we're
using
for
governance?
And
I
think
we
arrived
at
it's
a
tec
hatch
token,
which
will
be
sort
of
an
interim
token
between
the
dandelion
dow
launch
and
the
the
minting
from
the
bonding
curve.
But.
J
H
It's
funny,
I'm
like
the
the
like
source
of
single
source
of
truth.
That's
really
too
bad!
I'm
sorry
for
failing
you
guys
on
this.
So
yes,
that
is
absolutely
correct.
There
are
tech,
tokens
t-e-c-h,
so
the
the
first,
the
governance
process
right-
and
this
is
something
that
we
work
with
jake
and
ygg-
and
sam
a
little
bit
on
is
first
people
with
impact
hour,
tokens
and
c
stack.
H
Tokens
will
have
the
power
to
decide
the
hatch
parameters
right
and
then,
once
the
hatch,
the
tec
hatched
out
exists
after
the
hatch,
like
the
hatch
is
the
fundraising
portion
and
then
after
the
hatch
period
is
over,
then
you
have
a
dao,
and
this
is
the
tec,
hatch,
dial
and
so
people
will
have
t-e-c-h
tokens
token
engineering,
commons,
hash,
tokens
right
and
that
dao
will
use
the
same
process
with
token
log
and
stuff
to
decide
the
parameters
of
the
bond
the
commons
upgrade
so
drop
in
all
these
names
right.
So
there's
the
cut.
H
There's
the
the
hatch,
which
is
the
fundraising
period,
the
tec
hatch
dao,
which
is
this
in
between
period
between
the
hatch
and
the
commons
upgrade,
and
then
the
commons
upgrade,
which
is
where
the
tec
hatch
dial
hatches
again
into
a
into
a
full-fledged
commons,
with
a
bombing
curve
and
and
conviction
voting
and
the
people
with
tech
tokens
tec-h
tokens,
they
will
decide
what
these
parameters
are
by
using
token
log
and
their
tokens
see
stack
tokens
and
impact
hour.
Tokens
will
disappear
well
impact
hour.
D
G
A
H
H
Then
people
with
c-stack
tokens
will
be
able
to
send
money
to
the
hatch
and
that
will
create
tch
tokens
and
and
people
with
impact
hours.
When
the
hatch
is
over,
if
it
reaches
its
minimum
goal,
they
will
get
free
tec,
hatch
tokens
so
c
stack
token
holders
they
need
to
pay
for
they
need
to.
They
need
to
send
money
to
the
hatch,
but
the
the
impact
hour,
people
they
don't
need
to
send
money.
They
can
because
they
also
have
c-stack
tokens.
H
H
Yeah
well
so
the
the
decision
on
which
one
to
choose
will
happen
with
token
log
would
just
kind
of
off
chain
it's
like
snapshot
and
then,
but
it
will
need
to
be
ratified
on
chain,
because
there
will
be
an
actual.
The
dow
will
need
to
say
yes
and
you'll
need
to
like
there'll,
be
a
crazy
smart
contract
thing,
whereas
like
yeah
but
it'll
happen
on
that.
The
final
ratification
there'll
be
two
votes,
basically
sorting
vote
where
they
pick
the
favorite
parameters
and
the
last
vote
that
ratifies
it.
A
H
You
know
it
really
depends
on
the
person
so
like
when
I
talk
to
some
of
the
people,
I'm
able
to
say
it
in
a
couple
sentences
and
they
know
what
I'm
talking
about,
because
they're
like
already
have
studied
bonding,
curves
and
conviction.
Voting
right,
I,
like
you,
know
like
sem
you,
don't
have
to
explain
it
so,
but
other
people
like
I
talked
to
james
duncan
today,
a
little
bit
about
it
and
he
is
like.
E
All
right
I
can
I
pop
in,
I
will
just
say
too:
this
is
the
first
one,
so
it
seems
really
like
there
is
a
lot
of
pieces,
but
once
this
goes,
you'll
see
it's
a
lot,
it's
a
lot
smoother
than
it
sounds
like
it
will
show
itself.
I
I
don't
really
think
it'll
be
this
complicated
once
it's
working
for
you
to.
A
Yeah,
I'm
pretty
sure,
like.
I
completely
trust
that
my
my
my
my
sort
of
my
wish
is
that
everyone
on
this
call
also
gets
clear
of
what
he
just
explained
like
like
there's
something
that
I
want
like
to
make
sure
that
everyone
here
it's
clear
and
understand
what
he
explained
and
if
you
have
any
doubt
like
just
the
one
olivia
or
time
we're
explaining
just
bring
it
up.
If
he
needs
another
session,
we
can
book
another
session,
probably
the
ama.
A
A
A
No
yet
this
is
we.
Let's
say
the
onboarding
of
a
hatchery
is
a
different
process,
so
we
can
schedule
with
you
metaverde
meeting
and
walk
through
the
process
and
try
to
onboard
you
as
a
hatchery.
If
you
feeling
like
who
else
is
in
the
list,
like
is
everyone
here
on
this
call
booked
for
be
on,
boarded
or
is
someone
else
who
is
missed
besides
metaverde.
C
A
E
D
Yeah,
let's,
let's
do
that
offline?
I
think
I
think
we're
confusing
some
scopes
here,
and
this
happens
in
onboarding
almost
every
week,
which
is
the
scope
of
onboarding
new
members
into
the
community
versus
the
scope
of
onboarding
hackers
and
on-score
and
onboarding
proposals
so
to
meet.
Avert
is
question
of
whether
you're
on
board
it
or
not
in
the
community.
It,
maybe
not-
and
you
know
we're
we're
still
doing
our
community
onboarding
process.
D
Probably
you
are
you've,
jumped
into
a
lot
of
things
and
you're
in
a
lot
of
the
meetings,
but
for
onboarding
hatcher's.
The
the
objective
is
to
ensure
that
anybody
who
is
in
our
community
and
wants
to
participate
in
the
hatch
of
the
tec
understands
how
to
what
that
process
is,
and
somebody
is
available
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
about.
D
You
know
the
the
objectives
of
tec
or
the
process
to
join
the
swiss
association,
which
is
a
part
of
common
stack
and
that,
at
the
end,
we
sort
of
have
an
id
make
sure
that
you
understand
the
process
and
have
an
idea
of
a
soft
commitment
for
what
you
might
be
interested
in.
In
terms
of
the
fundraising
for
the
tec,
hatch.
D
D
Oh
you're,
talking
to
someone
else,
okay
and
then
in
terms
of
yeah
yeah,
I'm
sorry,
it's
okay
and
then,
in
terms
of
I
saw
your
mouth
moving.
I
thought
it
was
just
a
lag
and
then
in
terms
of
onboarding
proposals,
it's
talking
to
developers
or
researchers
or
educators,
any
projects
that
might
want
to
ask
the
tec
for
funding
and.
G
K
J
G
I
D
D
G
H
Then
there's
no
there's
no
minimum
for
an
individual,
but
there
is
a
minimum
for
the
hatch.
So
if
we
like,
if
the
whole
hatch
doesn't
rate,
if
the
minimum
ends
up
being
like
half
a
million
dollars
right,
then
if
we
don't
collect
at
least
half
a
million
dollars,
then
everyone
gets
their
money
back
and
it
doesn't
that's
that's
the
minimum
that
exists,
but
every
individual
could
just
put
in
one
diet.
H
G
H
Yeah,
so
this
is
a
great
question.
Actually
you
probably
do
have
c-stack
tokens.
I
mean
I
can
look
really
quick
okay,
because
if
you
earn
the
praise,
everybody
who
gets
praised
gets
seasoned.
Okay,
sometimes
there's
a
delay.
We
do
the
praise
once
a
month
so
like
all
the
c-stack
tokens
that
you
earn
for
january,
haven't
been
determined
yet
so
we'll
do
that.
H
H
H
H
A
Yeah
sorry
to
interrupt
yeah,
I
I
misguided
with
the
most
likely,
with
the
call
that
we
had
because
yeah
we
did
not.
We
didn't
talk
about
a
scholarship,
but
we
didn't
talk
about
self-commitments
and
so
on.
So
there
was
probably
the
confusion,
because
I
did
ask
grief
afterwards
a
call
about
the
scholarship
so
yeah,
so
it
was.
It
was
a
confusion
there.
So
we
can
meet
a
verde.
A
If
you
have
any
doubts
you
can
participate
at
any
moment,
because
I
see
you
there
so
you're
welcome
to
to
join
the
conversation
if
you
feel
like
or
if
you
have
any
doubts.
So
regarding
that
we
launch-
or
we
send
a
message,
yes
and
a
message
to
the
channels
asking
for
people
who
are
interested
on
proposing
for
the
common
stack
in
the
I
mean
the
common
such
channels
in
telegram,
and
we
got
one
answer
so
that
was
quite
quite
fun.
A
guy.
I
don't
know,
I
don't
like
his
name
in.
A
He
sends
a
message
asking
and
basically
saying
I
saw
your
post
about
support
for
os
token
projects.
We
are
building
a
system
that
enables
farmers
in
india
to
connect
directly
with
consumers
without
the
need
of
sophisticated
tech,
so
yeah,
so
I
esk
should
I
talk
to
him
we're
trying
to
book
a
a
calendar
day
for
him.
So
I
think
this
is
something
we
should
do
more
often
to
just
like
put
out
there,
that
we
are
open
for
proposals
and
and
so
on.
A
H
So
the
the
overall
picture
is
bright.
We
we
raised
the
total
soft
commits
is
almost
at
130
128
800.
So
that's
really
good.
There's
of
course,
a
power
law,
distribution,
there's
a
few
people
that
are
self-committing
somewhere
between
like
20
and
40
thousand
dollars
and
there's
a
lot
most
people
are
self-committing
closer
to,
like
you
know,
5
000,
to
500,
and
that's
where
the
bulk
of
the
humans
are
I'd
say
it's
pretty
good.
H
H
H
H
A
A
H
They
probably
are
not,
and
that's
one
of
those
things
where
we
might
want
to
just
wait
one
more
week
for
the
swiss
membership
app
to
be
open,
although
we
could
still
get
people
to
apply,
but
if
they
haven't
applied
to
the
trust.
I
I
still
kind
of
think
we
should
just
focus
on
onboarding
internally
for
this
next
week
and
really
cut
our
teeth
on
that
and
then
once
the
swiss
membership
gap
is
open,
then
we
can
be
like
okay
first
apply
the
trusted
seed.
Then
you're
gonna
go
to
this
thing.
A
G
A
J
D
I
mean
it's
up
to
you.
I
just.
I
also
wanted
to
add
that
it's
a
short
list.
You
know
we
started
with
10
people,
but
we
have
a
big
community,
so
you
know
we're
at
the
tip
of
the
iceberg
of
that
list.
So
one
the
more
people
that
we're
the
better
and
two
if
we
can
do
groups
of
two
or
three
people.
That
would
be
great
too.
A
D
A
D
D
D
So
we
can
definitely
add
to
this
list,
and
maybe
we
can
divide.
You
know
olivia
with,
like
I
love
to
take
more
cet
people,
because
my
mornings
are
so
free,
but
anything
after
4
p.m
is
just
not
available
for
me.
So
it's
really.
We
we
do
it
by
geographical
location,
so
juan
carlos
libya
would
be
great
craig
as
well,
and
I
don't
know
where
jonas
is
based.
Is
he
based
in
the
us
or
south
america.
L
A
A
D
H
L
Yeah
I
mean
I
guess
I
mean
I
don't
know
there
was
just
I
just
really
just
so
much
enjoy
your
approach.
I
just
think
it's
the
essence
of
what
the
token
economics
sort
of
I
mean.
This
is
just
my
personal
view,
but
sort
of
represents
a
non
potentially
often
it's
just
constrained
by
very
defy
principles,
and
I
just
sort
of
was
attracted
to
that
plus.
I
liked
the
academic
approach.
L
E
Hey
camera.
I
was
thinking
because
of
the
time
problems
that,
if
maybe
some
of
us
westerners
concentrate
on
that
homeless-
and
I
was
thinking
now
like
with
the
c
stack
like
with
the
swiss
membership
dev
team,
there's
they're,
almost
all
cet,
you
know
what
I
mean
and
they're
all
they're,
all
trusted
c.
E
D
D
M
D
D
D
E
A
D
D
I
N
D
D
D
A
E
Well,
we
should
just
should
just
keep
it.
We
we
we
do
the
whole
thing
and
then
inform
them
that
we
will
check
in
personally
about
their
soft
commit
and
then
handle
that
on
a
dm
side.
You
know
so
it's
at
the
very
end.
When
we
engage
that
part
of
the
conversation
just
we
will.
I
will
contact
you
personally
about
your
soft
commit
and
then
that
gives
them.
You
know
a
little
bit
of
time
to
think
or
whatever,
but
then
it's
private.
A
D
E
A
Yeah
I
I
heard
that
from
just2
and
then
I
will
probably
submit
akasha
hop
this
week
also
and
the
two
other
people
who
reach
back.
I
will
special
with
them
wildcards
and
so
on
this
week.
So
I
mean
there
was
no
updates
besides
angela
and
these
four
proposals
that
I
mean
are
in
the
waiting
list
with
me
because
they
are,
they
still
need
to
get
back
at
the
date
that
they
they
want
to
set
up.
A
H
G
These
groups-
I
I
I
understand
the
difference
now.
Can
you
tell
me
like
I
I'd
like,
I
know
people,
but
I
don't
know
if
they
fit
your
parameters.
What
are
the,
what
are
the
luke
is
definitely
a
token
engineer.
Well,
I
I
don't
mean
I
don't
mean
in
one
hive,
I
mean
from
other
projects
I've
been
on
in
the
past,
so
what
would
they
have
to
be?
Would
they
have
to
be
able?
Would
they
have
to
be
using
cat
cat?
G
H
That
their
value
aligned
with
the
need
to
support
access
to
token
engineering
tools
and
and
advance
the
field
of
token
engineering,
so
it
can
so
it
can
be
a
thing
right.
We
want
to
create,
make
token
engineering
a
thing,
a
standard,
so
people
who
agree
with
that
hell.
Yes,
but
then
there
are.
What
will
really
help
us
have
legitimacy
is
finding
these
really
busy.