►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
07:18 - Document for Onboard Hatchers
20:30 - TEC_Curate
42:52 - Proposals
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Eduardo
would
you
like
me
to
go
through
everything
in
our
agenda?
Yes,
please,
okay,
gosh,
I'm
really
worried
about
you.
Actually,
I
hope
you
feel
better.
At
least
you
know
it's
not
kovit,
so
maybe
it's
just
something
like
a
stomach
flu
or
I
don't
know
something,
not
scary.
A
Okay,
so
hatcher
outreach
exciting
welcome
everyone.
Let's
do
let's
just
do
a
moment
of
sort
of
level
setting
and
do
our
intentions
and
distractions,
and
I
guess
I'll
go
first
and
pass
it
and
I'll
say
my
intentions
are
to
give
some
updates
on
hatcher
outreach
to
also
get
some
updates
and
to
check
in
on
proposals
and
then
yeah.
I
think
we
also
should
talk
about.
Yes,
thank
you,
I'm
looking
at
the
the
agenda
that
eduardo
put
together.
A
I
think
we
have
some
articles
to
put
out
and
I
think
we
just
need
to
figure
out
and
and
how
like,
what
are
what
we're
going
to
do
with
them,
basically
to
review
them
and
then
find
like
the
right
distribution
channels
for
them,
and
I
will
pass
to
olivia.
B
C
Hello,
yes,
my
intention
is
to
help
in
the
hatch
outreach.
If
anyone
needs
like
a
shadow
to
to
any
of
the
meetings,
I
can
post
myself
available.
If
anyone
like
wants
someone
to
to
go
with
them
to
any
of
the
hatch
outreach
meetings,
and
I
don't
have
any
instruction,
I
will
pass
to
september.
D
E
Yeah
same
old
symbol
intentions
are
to
talk
about
how
to
hatch
outreach
and
push
it
forward,
especially
with
all
the
new
content
that
we
have
it's
very
exciting.
I
really
want
to
see
the
exit.
A
E
I'm
still
here,
can
you
hear
me
now:
okay
yeah,
to
go
over
the
like
the
the
post
that
you
send
someone
after
after
the
outreach,
love
to
see
that
and
then
see
what
we
have
assigned
I'll
pass
it
to
olivia.
F
Yeah,
I'm
doing
good.
I'm
excited
to
get
some
feedback
on
the
content
and,
like
maybe
figure
out,
like
maybe
some
cohesiveness,
on,
like
writing
it
and
like
how
we
want
our
stuff
to
look,
because
it
seems
like
there's
some
conflict
between
the
people
that
are
editing
it,
as
well
as
people
that
are
writing
it.
So
that
would
be
good
to
have
distractions,
doing
some
user
testing
on
some
other
stuff.
But
right
now
here
I'm
focused.
F
So
that's
good
and
I'll
pass
it
to
am
I
the
last
one
did
nate
go.
G
I
can
take
it
so
my
intention,
for
this
call
is
to
just
at
least
clarify
the
dc
great
and
update
it
and
get
us
get
everyone
here
in
this
call
to
get
assigned
to
someone
there,
and
my
instruction
is
that
my
mind
could
be
a
little
bit
distracted
somewhere
else
possible
too
late.
H
Yeah,
so
my
intention
is
to
get
updated
on
hatcher
outreach
aspects
and
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
your
distribution
needs.
I'm
trying
to
develop
a
comprehensive
distribution
process
so
yeah
once
you
have
content
and
yeah.
Let
me
know.
A
Okay-
and
I
think
that
was
it
and
for
anyone-
that's
joining
late
eduardo
was
very
sick
today
and
I
did
have
a
visit
to
the
hospital
so
he's
just
listening
in
and
laying
low
and
we're
going
to
continue
so
hatch
team
onboarding
sessions.
So
we
had
our
hatch
onboarding
team
with
juan
carlos
and
ivy,
and
I
did
a
session
with
craig
over
this
weekend.
A
So
if
it's
possible
it'd
be
awesome,
I
would
say:
don't
stop
asking
griff
if,
if
he
has
anything
upcoming,
but
I
don't
think
that
should
be
a
blocker
to
people
starting
to
second
other
people
as
well.
So
I
have
iv
on
a
call
with
me
tomorrow.
I
know
eduardo
has
ivy
with
a
call
with
him
on
monday,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
so,
and
juan
carlos
and
craig
I'm
keeping
in
the
back
of
my
mind
for
time
zones.
A
Actually,
the
call
tomorrow
morning
is
at
9am
c-e-t
so
and,
let's
so
yeah,
so
I
don't.
I
think
that
this
is
a
really
nice
group
for
us
to
start
with
for
new
people.
I
don't
know
that
there's
anything
else.
I
have
to
say
about
the
onboarding
session
itself.
A
We
can
give
some
updates
on
the
hatcher
outreach
look
at
the
curate
list
and
why
don't?
I
just
show
you
the
message:
why
don't
we
go
through
this
message?
Right
now,
give
me
one
moment:
please.
A
So
we've
put
together
a
little
list
of
urls,
basically
links
for
to
share
with
somebody
who
has
just
been
outreached
as
a
potential
hutcher
and
underneath
I'm
keeping
a
list
of,
like
other
other
things
that
are
useful,
sorry
other
useful
links.
So
the
idea
is
like
after
we
have
onboarded
someone.
So
this
is
the
whole
document
and
then,
after
we've
on
done
the
the
that
we've
spoken
about
each
of
the
points
we've
done,
the
recommendations
we've
asked
for
a
soft
commit.
A
We
should
praise
the
person
that
we've
just
on
board
in
and
then
the
follow-up
message.
We
have
two
now
like
if
they're
already
in
the
trusted
seed,
it's
a
different
message
than
people
have
to
apply
for
the
trusted
seed,
and
then
these
are
the
main
links
that
I
have
and
some
useful
links
underneath.
G
Yeah,
can
I
interrupt
you
for
a
second
sure
sure
I
yesterday
I
onboarded
polanski,
oh
the
guy
who
lives
below
chris
house,
and
he
I
actually
when
I
sent
this
message,
I
added
another
link,
which
is
the
faq
that
nate
wrote.
So
I
think
we
could.
We
could
add
nate's,
faq
or
any
faq
to
this
list,
mainly
because
the
gate
git
book
hatch
101
for
me,
is
still
a
little
bit
confusing
whether
the
nades
at
least
for
now
or
the
original
faq.
G
A
E
F
I,
even
though,
can
I
just
explain
that,
because.
A
F
That
so
the
thing
is
is
I
started.
Writing
the
hatch
document
whatever
and
then
I
looked
at
all
the
stuff
that
nate
wrote
and
it
was
all
there.
So
I
was
like
why
am
I
gonna
write
something
over
again
when
nate
made
this
beautiful
faq?
That,
frankly
deserves
to
be
more
than
faq
it
just.
It
explains
the
whole
thing,
so
I
was
like
it
seemed
a
bit
redundant
for
me
to
write
it
again,
so
I
just
moved
it
into
something
that
would
be
maybe
a
bit
more
general
and
that's
why
I
put
101.
A
I
know
that
we're
still
working
on
it
and
that
it's
gonna
get
better
and
that's
why
I'm
linking
to
that
instead
of
the
faq,
but
I'm
gonna
add
the
link
to
the
faq
as
well,
and
if
you
feel
more
comfortable
with
that,
maybe
at
that
one
I
guess.
Actually
let
me
just
ask
the
question.
A
E
A
G
F
Yeah
yeah,
so
not
everything
in
here
is
done
like
me,
and
libby
met
earlier
this
week
and
like
we're
restructuring
it.
So
that's
kind
of
what
we're
going
for,
and
I
think
this
is
like
a
bigger
conversation
in
the
git
book,
but
yeah.
A
So
our
options
are
to,
I
think
our
options
are
like
to
retire
one
and
put
all
our
efforts
into
building
out
the
second
one
and
using
that
link
and
letting
people
know
hey
it's
a
work
in
progress.
It's
not
perfect,
but
it's
gonna
get
perfect
or
we
continue
sharing
an
old
link
that
we're
no
longer
working
on
I'm
leaning
towards
the
option
a
because
we
can
put
the
effort
into
the
get
book
and
I'd
love
to
hear
from
mitch
and
nate
on
this.
Who
are
the
two
people
who
are
producing
this
content
for
us.
H
Sorry,
yeah
and
second
year,
the
the
the
good
book
is
going
to
be
the
the
comprehensive
thing
that
people
need
to
reference
eventually
and
it
is
a
work
in
progress
and
as
long
as
you,
they
understand
that
if,
if
they
have
a
trouble
navigating
questions
about
the
hatch
and
process
in
general,
I
you
know
I
I
kept
the
my
get
book
page
up
there
just
in
case,
but
if
you
don't
no
longer
need
it,
all.
The
information
is
still
within
the
the
tec
handbook
page.
H
H
I'm
just
saying
it's
still
a
work
in
progress
and
it
will
be
finished
very
soon.
B
B
B
I
think
it's
already
in
a
point
that
yeah,
that
is.
A
Understandable
all
right,
so
so
then
it's
clear
we
should
be
sharing
the
git
book
with
just
the
disclaimer
that
it's
a
work
in
progress,
but
the
hatch,
the
hatch
questions
are
all
updated
and
will
continue
to
be
updated.
A
Yes,
is
there
anything
else
about
the
message
griff,
I
know
that's
you
that
wanted
to
look
at
it.
Is
there
it's
super
basic.
Really,
it's
just
like
a
reminder
to
do
it
and
your
message
should
certainly
be
custom
to
whoever
you're
speaking
to
I
usually
refer
to
one
or
two
things
that
we
talked
about
so
to
make
it
quite
personal
to
who
I
just
spoke
to,
but
it's
a
nice
reminder
for
me.
A
Okay,
I've
come
across
a
number
of
people
who
are
not
in
the
trusted
seed,
so
also
it's
we
we
need
to
yeah,
I'm
I'm
gonna
make
a
mental
note
to
myself
actually
to
check
before
I
go
into
the
meeting,
because
I
think
fabian
wasn't
in
the
trusted
seat
and
that
took
me
by
surprise.
Actually,
so
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
has
come
across
that
too,
but
maybe
that's
something
I
can
do
for
the
curate
list.
G
Yeah
I
had
that
question
for
grief
too,
because
polanski,
I
sent
him
the
link
to
this
visa's
membership
association
and
the
score
launched
for
him,
like
he
had
the
score
already,
but
he
hasn't
paid
the
membership
dues.
G
E
Yeah
I
mean
if
they
have
c
stock
tokens,
that's
generally
the
if
they
I
mean
it's
kind
of
like,
I
think
for
most
people,
because
the
data
that
they
give
is
kind
of
not
really
easy
for
us
to
share,
and
we
don't
have
the
well
yeah
I
mean
they
would
have
to
tell
us
we're
trying
not
to
connect
people's
addresses
to
their
names
in
any
overt
way.
So
you
can,
they
can
go
to
the
registry
on
on
xdi
and
control
f
their
address
on
the
read
contract
page.
E
If
they
know
what
address
they
use,
the
main
thing
is:
hey.
Do
you
remember
ever
filling
out
this
type
form?
I
mean
if
they
remember
filling
out
the
type
form
they're
they're,
probably
in
the
trusted
seed.
They
got
it.
G
And
there
is
this
case
of
giulio,
giulio.
He
is
the
guy
who
is,
I
onboarded
him
on
monday
and
he
he
remember
having
impact
hours,
but
he
doesn't
know
if
he
is
on
the
transition.
So,
for
example,
if
someone
received
a
praise
but
he's
on
the
trusted
seat,
how
does
that
work?
Because
that
is
a
question
he
asked.
E
Yeah,
no,
so
if
on
xdad,
he
has
tokens
that
say,
impact
hour
tokens
or
really
just
c
stack
tokens,
because
anyone
who
has
impact
hours
also
has
c
stack.
So
if
they
have
c
stack
tokens
on
the
on
x
die
then
for
sure
they're,
because
the
only
way
we
could
send
them.
The
c
stack
tokens
is
if
they
applied
to
the
trusted
seat
and
we
have
their
address.
E
If
so,
if
they
have
sea
stack
tokens,
they
apply
to
the
trust.
If
they
don't,
they
still
might
have
applied
to
the
trusted
seat.
Maybe
we
just
never
praised
them,
so
they
aren't
see
stack
tokens
through
praise
or
by
donating.
E
But
I
mean
it's
not
the
end
of
the
world.
If
they
don't
remember,
the
real
thing
is:
do
you
remember
filling
out
this
type
form
and
then
you
can
check
with
me
tam.
Let
me
see
who
else
has
access
to
the
sheet?
I
think
olivia.
Do
you
have
access
to
that
sheet?
Now.
B
A
So
there's
there's
a
way
that
they
can
check
themselves,
as,
as
you
said,
eduardo
by
going
to
the
membership
dap
and
if
they
use
the
correct
wallet
that
they
signed
up
for
in
the
trusted
seat.
It'll
come
up
and
the
other
way
that
wesley
showed
me
today
is
they
can
see
if
they
plug
their
address
in
here
and
then
they
can
see
if
they
have
c
stack
tokens.
A
So
I
just
put
those
two
links
inside
our
our
document.
If
you
want
to
do
you
can
check
if
they
know
their
ethereum
address,
if
they
don't
know
their
ethereum
address,
then
you,
you
would
definitely
check
with
griff
myself
olivia.
I
think
it's
probably
the
right
way
to
go,
because
that
can
happen
too.
E
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
the
coolest
thing
is
to
send
them
to
the
dap
honestly,
we'll
want
them
to
go
there
anyway,
and
it's
a
cool.
It's
a
cool
dap
gives
you
an
opportunity
to
talk
about
how
this
dap
uses
three
blocks.
Three
block
chains
and
by
the
end
of
it,
you
become
a
legal
member
of
a
swiss
association,
really
uses
four
block
chains,
because
the
switzerland
is
one
you
know
so
four
block
chains,
because
you
know.
G
Yes,
actually
paul
polanski
was,
he
was
really
surprised,
but
he
was
real.
A
Okay,
we'll
move
on
okay,
the
curate
sheet,
so
I
feel,
like
we've
been
pretty
busy.
Actually
we
have
a
number
of
soft
commits
amin
wesley
frederico,
tanner
fabian
angela's
tomorrow
morning,
jake,
I
think,
is
here
excellent,
ygg
blair.
A
We
have
a
few
more
to
do
and
I
haven't
really
made
this,
like
you
know,
to
get
that
initial
communication
to
like
start
sending
to
everybody
really
just
takes
time
to
organize
and
then
going
back
and
forth
with
putting
people
in
calendars,
and
it's
it's
like
that
that
it's
not
really
cat
hurting,
but
that,
like
just
administrative
work
of
like
sending
out
these
messages,
fielding
the
messages
putting
them
in
calendars,
suggesting
other
dates.
Getting
a
second
is
so
time
consuming.
A
But
I've
reserved
my
tomorrow
morning,
part
of
my
tomorrow
morning
to
do
that.
So
I'm
gonna
make
a
push
on
the
next
ones
that
that
I
have
that
don't
have
a
soft
commit,
and
maybe
we
can
have
a
look
at
this
together
now
and
see
who
else
in
terms
of
like
livia
eduardo
jake.
We
want
you
guys
want
to.
If
there's
anybody,
you
want
to
add
your
name
to
to
work,
to
to
contact.
A
So
we
have
all
of
these
still
open.
So
maybe
olivia
I'll
ask
you.
If
you
are,
you
have
two
people?
Oh
sorry,
this
one's
switched.
Angela
can
only
do
two
in
the
morning,
so
she's
9
a.m.
Tomorrow
morning,
but
livia
can
we
is
there
people
on
this
list
that
we
can
assign
you
to
or
that
you'd
like
to
take
okay,
yeah
there's
also.
B
B
I
can
abort
manu
from
five
pandemics.
G
Can
I
ask
about
ellie
hanover,
he
hasn't
been
connected
on
telegram
for
a
few
days.
It
seems
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
other
way
to
contact
him
ellie
with
ellie,
just
e-o-e-l-I.
A
A
G
E
A
I
Okay,
oh
I
I
onboarded
santiago
too,.
A
I
And,
along
with
victor
fabio
and
victor.
E
Okay
and
what
about
fabio.
I
I'm
still
waiting
here
back
from
fabio
because
santiago
understood
what
it
meant
fabio
too,
had
the
language
barrier
with
what
a
soft
commit
was.
So
I
got
that
explained
and
I'm
waiting
to
hear
back
from
him.
G
Can
we
have
a
time
to
discuss
about
the
morning
that
we
had
tam
and
this
person
who
was
not
sure
and
didn't
like
he
was
interested
on
the
project,
but
at
the
same
time
he
was
hesitant
about
the
structure
and
so
on,
and
just
as
a
case
of
study
for
everyone
here
who
may
found
these
persons
who
they
want
to
be
part.
But
they
are
not
getting
in
or
being
a
hatred
because
by
the
money
or
for
the
money,
and
they
don't
care
much
about
the
money
either.
A
Yeah,
but
it's
not
about
how
much
funds
they
have
to
add.
I
think
we're
talking
about
federico
that
that
this
onboarding
session-
yes
yeah
it
was,
it
was
a
great
session.
You
know
at
one
point
he's
just
like
I'm
an
anarchist,
I
don't
believe
in
organizations
and
it
was-
and
it
was
really
his
excitement
of
what
we're
doing
that
he
wants
to
participate
in
it,
but
yeah
I
don't.
I
don't
look
at
the
a
soft
commitment
as
high
or
low
being
stronger
or
weaker.
A
Just
you
know,
somebody's
excitement
to
participate
in
in
in
the
tec
in
the
tec
hatch,
do
you
want
to
share
your
outlook
too,
and
maybe
we
even
get
some
more
input.
G
Yeah,
it's
not
about
the
funds,
it's
about
the
hesitance
about
the
money
because
he
was
not.
He
was
it's
not
about
the
funds.
He
was
whether
he
was
putting
a
lot
or
not.
Is
the
fact
that
he
felt,
for
example,
that
his
time
was
value
money
and
he
felt
that
by
giving
time
to
the
tec,
it
was
enough-
and
that
was
his
approach
or
one
of
his
approaches.
So
this
is
an
interesting
point
of
view,
but
this
is
another
question.
What
what
do
we
do
with
that
answer?.
A
My
feeling
was
that
we
did
was
probably
the
right
thing.
It
was
you
know,
yeah
you.
You
can
absolutely
continue
to
participate
and
earn
impact
hours
and
turn
into
tec.
You
know
that,
but
and
you
don't
have
to
participate
in
the
hatch
and
you're,
always
welcome
in
the
community.
You
know
there's
no,
that's
I.
I
think
you
know
he.
I
think
my
feeling
was
that
you
know
towards
the
end
of
that
conversation.
A
He
did
get
it
and
that's
why
he
also
was
willing
to
give
a
soft
commit
as
well,
because
we
were
quite
clear
that
this
isn't
a
call
for
fun.
You
know
this
isn't
a
fundraiser.
This
is
an
opportunity
to
participate
in
the
this
tc
patch
at
a
discounted
rate
right
and
then,
if
he
doesn't
want
to
come,
keep
coming.
You
know,
earn
see
you
by
being
part
by
being
present.
G
I
just
mentioned
this
because
I
think
it
would
be
a
nice,
it's
a
nice
case
study
for
everyone
who
will
start
onboarding
because
they
may
be
facing
this
kind
of
person
who
doesn't
get
it
or
doesn't
understand
the
full
because
elson.
What
when
I
am,
he
expressed
a
similar
question
that
he
was
afraid.
Well,
he
was
different.
He
basically
said
I
have
no
money.
I
have
no
ability
to
fund
it.
I
can
only
put
this
very
small
amount
and
he
has
a
very
valid
question.
G
E
So
on
that
one
we
have
a
bonding
curve
that
really
gives
a
like
dampens
the
volatility.
So
the
token
will
not
go
to
the
moon
and
it
will
not
crash
to
the
ground.
You
know
and
actually,
because
the
people
who
are
in
the
hatch
are
likely
to
have
a
vest,
a
vesting
requirement
for
a
long
time.
There
will
effectively
be
a
floor
because
people
put
money
in
and
they
can't
get
it
out
right.
E
So
there's
like
tokens
that
are
locked,
and
so
there
will
be
this
effective
price
floor
and
then
there'll
be
a
fluctuation
above
that
you
can
see
this
in
the
on
the
commonstack.org
abc
when
you
click
run
simulation
on
this
little
graph.
There's
this
yield
little
yellow
line.
That
then
has
a
curve,
and
you
can
kind
of
see
that
there
is
a
there
is
a
like
a
mathematical
price
floor.
This
isn't
a
there's,
a
project
called
bancor
that
had
a
price
floor
and
it
was
it
went,
broke
through
the
floor.
This
is
actually
like.
E
The
tokens
are
locked,
it's
in
a
bonding
curve
and
it
can't
go
below
this
price,
but
that
also
means
the
people
who
put
money
in
the
hatch.
They
can't
sell
right.
G
Yeah,
that
was
the
explanation.
I
gave
him
without
the
link
basically,
but
he
also
asked
why
we
didn't
went
for,
for
example,
he
was
asking
like.
Oh,
if
I
bring
someone
else,
will
I
get
a
share
off
and
I'm
like?
No,
no,
this
is
not.
It
doesn't,
doesn't
work
on
this
way.
G
He
was
looking
from
investment
kind
of
perspective
and
that's
why
I
understood
the
importance
of
the
work
investing
rather
than
investing
and
so
on,
and
he
followed
that
thought
asking
about
the
market
and
this
fluctuation
thing,
and-
and
I
think
this
is
valuable
as
a
feedback
understanding
that
some
people
will
have
people
that
maybe
doesn't
know
much
about
token
engineering
will
have
a
more
market
related
view
about
this.
E
Yeah-
and
I
wanted
to
comment
on
what
you
said
about
federico
too,
if
that's
okay,
I
I
think
with
fred
rico,
when
it's
like
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
put
time
in
and
da
da
da
I'm.
This
is
cool.
There's
a
couple
things:
it's
like
number
one.
E
This
is
an
opportunity,
but
and
and
yeah
it's
financial
opportunity,
but
more
importantly,
it's
the
social
power
opportunity,
we're
building
the
the
effectively
the
engineering
society
for
token
engineering,
the
it'll
be
the
shelling
point
for
the
standards
and
the
evolution
of
this
new
science
field
of
science
study
and
frederico,
specifically
like
dude.
We
need
him,
we
need
him
and
he
needs
to
be
here
because
he
is
evolving
token
engineering
in
the
right
direction.
E
You
know
and
this
the
social
direction,
and
it's
that
we
can
cons,
consider
that
it's
not
all
just
algorithms,
you
know
there's
humans
and
things
get
weird
so
like
what
and
and
if
he
gets
into
the
hatch
he'll
have
a
lot
of
power
for
really
cheap
compared
to
later
on
in
the
game,
and
that's
the
that's
the
big
thing,
because,
even
though
the
tokens
are
locked,
the
tokens
can
still
be
used
to
boat,
and
that's
the
cool
thing
here
is
that
you
get
a
lot
of
voting
power.
E
You
get
to
say
what
projects
get
funded,
but
but
even
more
than
that,
you'll
get
into
these
channels.
Probably
they'll
probably
be
like
a
sort
of
a
social
status
associated
with
how
much
tec
tokens
you
have.
I
don't
know
how
to
best
communicate
that
to
someone
right,
but
it's
real.
Like
all
of
a
sudden,
you
have
authority,
and
you
know
power
in
this
organization.
G
G
E
D
E
I
feel
like
it
should
be
our
leading
selling
point
with
everyone,
especially
token
engineers,
that
this
is
like
we're
starting
a
new
and
we're
starting
in
a
token
engineering
society
and
like
like
the
ieee
or
or
one
of
these
other
professional
engineering
organizations
that
will
provide
a
lot
of
value,
and
if
you
get
in
the
ground
floor
you
get
to,
you
will
have
the
ability
to
direct
this
organization
as
it
you
know,
evolves.
This
new
field
of
study.
G
Can
I
ask
also
before
we
continue
to
everyone
who
is,
it
could
be
added
to
the
bottom
of
the
links
or
the
messages
as
a
follow-up,
but
to
also
ask
at
the
end
of
the
calls
if
anyone
knows
a
project
or
a
proposal
or
another
hatcher
that
may
want
to
propose
to
them
to
this,
because
I
feel
that's
one
of
the
questions
we
lose
the
most
is
about
referral.
A
Yeah
good
point:
we
definitely
always
ask
for
recommendations
in
terms
of
other
hatchers
and
maybe
50
of
the
time
asked
for
projects,
but
I
just
added
it
as
a
reminder
to
everyone
who's
using
the
script
jake,
you
wanted
to
say
something.
I
Well,
I
was
just
trying
to
pick
names
and
I
know
that
you
said
you
were
gonna.
You
know
reach
finish
reaching
out
to
spawn
it
and
that's
why
I
saw
old
pathway
pax
the
max.
Were
you
gonna?
Were
you
gonna
like
just
continue
with
that
group,
then?
Otherwise,
I
was
going
to
pick
pax.
The
max.
I
I
I
I
Yeah,
that's
why
that's
why
I
picked
his
name
out
because
a
lot
of
these
I'm
getting
to
a
point
where
I
don't
recognize
that
I
don't
know
a
lot
of
these
other
names,
so
cool
okay,
am
I
just
picking
three
or
should
I
pick
more.
A
I
do
want
to
say
something:
I've
actually
had
the
opposite
question,
which
is
people
who
have
asked
me
how
they
can
contribute
more
than
their
cst
score
allows
because
they
want
to
come
in
with
more
weights,
and
that
was
a
tricky
question
to
answer
actually
because
well,
I
don't
believe
we
can,
but
I
love
feedback
griff,
that's
it's
people
that
have,
and
it
was
like
I'll.
Tell
you
exactly
what
it
was.
It
was
a
token
engineer
with
his
head
down
working
on
his
project
and
but.
A
E
It's
just
not
an
answer.
We
we
have
it's
your
economy,
your
choice,
so
the
sea
stacks
that
we
call
it.
The
membership
ratio
is
not
known
yet
so
it
may
not
matter
it
may
be.
With
one
c
stack
token
you
can
send
in
a
million
dollars
or
it
may
be,
that
you
need
10
000
c
stack
token
to
send
in
20
bucks.
You
know,
probably
not,
though,
probably
not
either
of
those
extremes,
but
we
we're
going
to
vote
on
it.
A
E
They
I
mean
they
can
donate
to
the
common
stack
and
get
some
extra
c
stack.
You
know
like
that's,
that's
always
the
easiest
thing
pay
extra
on
their
membership
dues
when
they
put
in,
but
in
the
end
we
can't
tell
them.
E
We
just
can't
tell
them
for
certain
that
it
will
matter
right
like
I
don't
want,
we
always
got
to
be
careful
not
to
set
expectations.
You
know
if
someone's
like
just
throws
in
ten
thousand
dollars
and
their
membership,
you
know
dues
and
then
it's
what
the
I
didn't
need
to
do
that
like
we
don't
want
that
feeling
either
got.
G
Yeah
yeah,
if
there
was
a
maximum
of
donation
to
this.
A
Dues,
membership
of
extra
maximum
amount
of
extra
dues,
yeah.
E
E
They
can
send
as
much
money
as
they
want,
but
there
is
a
maximum
amount
of
c
stack
that
they
will
get
that
every
individual
can
have
and
if
they
want
more,
they
have
to
go
talk
to
the
common
stack
and
probably
just
give
us
some
more
information
on
who
the
they
are
because
like
if
you
fill
out
the
trusted
seed
form-
and
you
don't
put
in
like
a
link
to
your
twitter
and
linkedin-
and
we
can't
we
don't
know
who
you
are,
then
you
get
a
really
low
score
because
well
you
know,
we
don't
trust
you,
because
we
don't
know
you
you
know,
but
if
they
give
us
lots
of
information
and
it's
clear
that
they're
like
token
engineer
or
altruistic,
then
who
like
is
in
the
scene
and
like,
has
a
reputation
at
stake.
E
A
A
Do
we
want
to
cover
anything
else
here,
or
should
we
move
on
to
the
next
subject
in
the
last
15
minutes.
E
I
E
Cool
and
it
I
I
can
make
it
open
if
anyone
else
wants
to
it'll
be
a
weird
one,
she's
my
girlfriend
so.
I
A
Cool
okay
proposals
next
steps,
so
I'm
a
little
out
of
where
we
are
with
proposals
and
what
we
can
do
next,
but
maybe,
if
we
put
all
our
heads
together,
we
could
put
some
next
action
steps
down
for
how
to
how
to
gain
some
more
momentum.
With
proposals
eduardo.
I
know
that
you
were
working
on
a
list
from
the
git
coin
grants
and
maybe
do
you
have
any
other
update
or
help
that
you
need.
So
we
can
take
some
take
some
actions
for
onboarding
proposals
or
reaching
out
to
people
projects
and
proposals.
G
Yeah,
I
forgot
to
send
the
list
to
the
common
community
steward,
so
I
will
pass
it
on
the
list
and
if
anyone
can
give
feedback
about
this,
this
git
coin
grants
va
projects.
It
will
be
amazing,
mostly
probably
I
don't
know
who
else
knows
the
bitcoin
people
or
the
for
these
projects.
I
have
no
clue
about
them,
so
that's
why
I
will
ask
for
your
help
and
yeah.
G
That's
the
only
the
only
approach
I
can
find
right
now,
because
from
the
list
and
the
tc
query
that
we
have
of
proposals,
most
of
them
has
already
been
contacted
and
most
of
them
has
not
answered
or
had
declined
because
of
time
or
has
rescheduled
because
of
time.
So
we
need
to
add
more
names,
at
least.
E
G
E
G
Yeah,
that
will
be
amazing,
mainly
because
when
I
look
for
talking
related
projects,
there
were
very
few.
They
only
show
up
around
five
that
had
activity.
There
were
others
that
had
zero
activity,
so
I
don't-
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
other
reference
or
any
other
attack
that
I
could
use
to
look
for
these
projects.
That
could
be
interesting
for.
A
And
I
have
a
question
in
here
for
you
jake
yeah,
you
got
it:
okay,
okay,
thank
you
for
updating
that.
A
So
how
is
that
that
I
mean
that's
a
great
place
to
start
if
we
have
a
few
dozen
lists
of
projects
that
we're
already
supporting
through
bitcoin
grants,
you
know
is
that
where
we
are,
is
that
the
list
you
mean
griff
and
then
we
can
sort
of
just
start
to
divide
that
list
and
reach
out
to
people
and
ask
them
if
they'd
like
to
also
apply
for
funding
from
tec.
E
B
B
How
do
we
engage
with
these
proposals
to
make
sure
like
it
doesn't
happen
when
it's
happening
now,
but
there
is
very
few
engagement
and
I
think
we
should
guide
them
all
to
the
advice
process,
and
maybe
we
all
agree
on
that
and
then
first
reach
out
to
all
of
the
ones
that
are
there
already
and
say
that
we
are
moving
the
proposal
to
advice,
process
and
explaining.
Why.
G
I
think
that's
a
good
idea.
Can
I
ask
also
one
more
question,
which
is,
I
don't
know
how
it
was
before
or
how
it
was
done
before,
but
have
we
checked
sort
of
that
all
the
people
who
are,
for
example,
in
our
telegram
channels,
at
least
maybe
construction
or
something
that
they
are
proposed?
Also
people
have
projects
there
that
may
be
interested
on
and
we
have
just
before.
Moving
on
to
external
bitcoin
runs
checking
on
these.
B
G
On
the
people,
from
our
main
channels,
people
from
the
discord,
engineering,
original
discord
and
from
our
telegram
channels,
from
common
stock
or
from
the
dc
or
whatever,
like
checking.
If
there
is
any
a
project
or
group
of
people
or
people
or
individuals
who
are
in
projects
that
may
be
interesting
funding,
because
I
don't
think
we
send
out
enough
messages
there
to.
Let
them
know
that
we
are
open
for
this.
B
Yeah,
I'm
just
saying
I
think
you
were.
We
were
discussing
this
briefly
in
safkoff
yesterday-
that,
for
example,
piktos's
proposal
was
which
wrong
and
I
think
there
is
and
then
I
checked
the
proposals
and
there
is
very
there's
no
engagement
on
them
really
and
then
they
come
to
our
call
to
present
on
thursday.
B
But
then
there's
not
really
a
follow-up,
and
I
feel
like
that
puts
people
down
because
they
we
raise
an
expectation
in
the
thursday
call
there's
a
lot
of
people
in
the
call
they
want
that
attention
and
then,
after
it's
just
kind
of
a
ghost
town
and
in
the
proposal
section.
So
I
think
of
saying
we
should
move
them
to
the
advice
process
and
then
jake
suggested
having
like
a
devil's
advocate
in
every
proposal
having
some
sort
of
like
questions
or
someone
from
the
community.
We
can.
B
We
could
rotate
this
role
for
creating
engagement
in
this
proposals
and
and
communicating
to
them
that
that's
not
the
final
proposal
and
that's
why
it
goes
to
advice
process,
because
when
the
commons
is
launched,
we'll
have
the
the
funds.
But
maybe
one
proposal
is
asking
for
10
000
and,
and
we
don't
know
how
the
parameters
will
be
yeah
for
the
conviction
they
will
need
and
all
that
stuff.
So
it's
good
to
just
have
this
like
awareness
that
they
might
need
to
change
the
proposal
before
submitting
it
to
the
comments.
B
So
that's
why
I
go
into
advice
process
first,
so
I'm
I'm
proposing
now
that
we
look
into
all
of
the
proposals
that
are
there
and
we
pick
someone
to
or
multiple
people
to
talk
to
each
one
of
the
people
that
submitted
a
proposal
and
explained
to
them
the
state
we
are
at
now
and
then
once
we
move
them
to
advice
process.
If
they
agree,
then
we
have
like
a
an
engagement
action.
B
B
So
the
people
that
are
proposing
they
are
welcome
to
tag
a
few
individuals
that
they
would
love
to
hear
feedback
from
or
if
they
don't
have
anyone
specific.
They
would
like
to
hear
feedback
that
will
have
that
open
for
the
community
and
then
they
will
have
the
chance
to
improve
that
proposal
before
posting
it
to
the
comments,
because
that
enhances
the
chance
that
when
it's
in
the
comments
and
actually
going
like
for
the
grant
that
that
will
pass
because
more
people
who
will
have
been
aware
about
that
and
that
proposal
was
like
yeah.
A
That's
super
clear.
Thank
you,
who's
who
can
champion
this
effort
this
the
proposals
is
there
somebody
here
that
can
really
champion
it?
You
know
work
with
the
list
from
griff.
Look
at
the
cv,
common
stack
craft
messages
about
where
we're
going
into
advice
or
or
advice
process
that
you
know
to
help
craft
messages
are
going
to
advise
process
tracking
who
who
is
like
who
do?
We
have
someone
that
can
champion
this
effort
strictly
for
proposals.
G
I
think
we
can
make
sort
of
a
small
pain
of
actions
whether
like
a
proposal
is
received.
G
Someone
takes
ownership
of
sharing
that
proposal
to
the
rest
of
the
community
and
then
just
acknowledging,
thank
you
or
just
a
fresh
feedback
and
then
the
rest
of
us
sort
of
complete
to
go
to
that
proposal
and
give
feedback.
A
Okay,
so
for
the
ones
already
on
the
forum,
we're
good
for
the
ones
that
we've
reached
out
to,
but
we
have
no
further
momentum.
They,
you
know
these
are
super
busy
people
with
super
busy
projects,
so
it
might
be
take
them
time
to
put
a
proposal
together.
The
next
action
item
is:
is
there
somebody
that
can
help
like
reach
out?
Maybe
one
last
time
saying
we're
moving
to
advice,
process
and
go
through
all
of
these
or
take
take
five
of
these
to
start
with.
G
Can
can
I
just
sorry
to
interrupt
that
thoughts
libby.
Do
you
feel
that
the
proposals
that
are
already
on
the
phone
need
improvement?
G
B
Yeah,
I'm
saying
that
it
would
be
good
I
can
I
can.
I
can
commit
with
reaching
out
to
all
of
the
proposers
of
the
proposals
that
are
already
in
there
and
ask
them
to
move
category
like
I
can.
I
can
do
that
with
their
permission
and
explain
them
why
and
where
we're
at
so
we
have
no
proposals
in
in
conviction
voting
now
and
then
we
use
the
conviction
voting
session
when
we're
actually
gonna
put
them
in
the
dow.
So
that
is
a
a
reflection
of
the
proposals
that
are
actually
actually
asking
for
for
funding.
A
Okay,
we
have
one
minute
left
and
we
have
a
hard
stop
at
the
hour.
So
I
feel
like
we
don't
have,
I
don't
know
eduardo.
I
know
you're
sick
in
bed,
so
I
can't
I
feel,
like
I
can't
ask
you,
but
if
somebody
could
think
about
championing
reaching
out
to
people
who
we
have
already
reached
out
to
to
follow
up
with
them
on
whether
they
are
still
interested,
if
they
can
move
to
advice,
process
and
submit
proposals
or
the
new
list
that
griff
will
be
providing,
that
would
be
cool.
G
I
can
take
that
it's
okay,
because
I
have
I
mean,
since
everyone
is
helping
with
the
hatcheries.
I
have
more
time
for
proposals
or
I
expect
to
have
more
time
for
proposals,
so
that
should
be
fine,
and
I
will
ask
just
this
is
a
subjective
point
of
view,
but
I
will
ask
for
the
help
of
someone
like
probably
grief
or
jake,
who
has
a
very
kind
of
energy
aligned
with
this
kind
of
people.
I
don't
have
they.
G
I
don't
have
their
energy
or
their
knowledge,
so
it
would
be
nice
if
I
get
help
by
someone
like
this.
I
A
That
is
your
super
power.
Okay,
cool!
Well!
That's
it
for
this
week
and
see
you
all
soon
and
thanks
everyone
for
coming
to
this.
We
didn't
finish,
but
the
community
call
is
also
in
our
stewards
agenda.
So
we'll
pick
that
up
in
this
next
meeting.