►
From YouTube: Session 2 TEC Proposal building: initial buy-in
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
This
is
the
template
that
was
from
the
forum.
This
is
the
template
in
the
forum.
So
probably
this
is
the
information
we
want
to
share.
Okay,
so
maybe
just
quick
next,
like
what
we're
doing
in
this
session.
A
From
my
perspective,
I'll
go
first,
any
any
distractions
you
have.
I
think
we
are
there
in
terms
of
what
we're
going
to
do
and
now
it's
a
matter
of
writing
the
proposal.
So
I
feel
like
hey,
you
want
carlos,
so
I
feel
like
that's
probably
what
we
do.
We
could
probably
start
this
with
going
through
each
of
the
pieces,
maybe
that
that
will
go
into
the
proposal
and
then
maybe
have
like
a
writing
session
to
write
the
proposal.
A
That's
what
I
kind
of
hope
to
happen,
but
open
to
other
ideas
or
anything
that
needs
discussion
and
my
distractions
are
so
honestly.
I
have
like
40
tabs
open
of
things
that
I
need
to
do
so.
My
tabs
are
operating
as
my
to-do
list,
and
that
makes
me
feel
really
uncomfortable.
So
I
feel
like
I
want
to
start.
A
B
C
Yeah
thanks,
mr
my
intention
is
almost
the
same.
I
just
the
only
concern
I
have
is
like
about
the
number
like
it
was
some
dispersity.
Like
some
people,
you
know
the
number
is
I
don't
know
I.
I
do
not
feel
comfortable
choosing
any
of
those
numbers
right
now
for
me,
but
yeah.
I
think
we
we
could
do
it
in
this
hour
and
if
we
do
it,
it's
yeah
and
I.
D
Thanks
septi
yeah,
I
I
want
to
follow,
follow
with
you
this
process,
and
I
am
also
interested
in
the
in
in
what
can
come
up
from
this
meeting.
My
distraction
is
that
I
am
also
sending
tweets
and
inviting
people
to
the
graviton
training
but
yeah.
I
am
mostly
listening
and-
and
here
with
you
guys,.
A
Cool
okay,
so
maybe
just
a
recap
from
last
week,
so
the
the
points
are
that
there
is
some
one
of
these
figures.
We
could.
We.
A
And
disadvantages
of
the
figures:
we
don't
need
to
do
that
right
now
and
the
structure
for
custody
governance
is
looking
like
this,
so
seven
person
committee,
five
of
seven
multisig
and
then
they're
the
process
for
oh
yeah,
thanks
for
doing
that,
whoever
did
this
and
then
the
process
for
and
then
there
being
a
process
right
for
allocation
of
those
funds
to
be
voted
in
by
the
community,
and
that
would
happen,
I
guess
on
snapshot
right.
A
So
this
is
the
prerequisite
and
then
clear
guidelines
for
what
kind
of
cases
can
be
submitted
for
allocation
and
the
cases
are
strategic
partnerships,
liquidity
and
secondary
markets.
Now
there
is
a
second
part
of
this.
Actually
so
this
is
this:
is
the
custody
custody
by
the?
What
do
we
want
to
call
this
by
the.
B
You're
talking
about
the
custody
by
the
rewards
dao,
the
reward
board.
A
D
B
I
have
a
question
for
you,
though,
say
this:
this
x
board
we
haven't
picked
a
name
for
it
c,
is
an
opportunity
and
makes
proposal
to
the
community
to
do
something
with
the
funds.
Can
they
do
that.
B
A
I
have
can
I
jump
in
if
it's
okay,
I
am
more,
I
think
what
mitch
is
raising
is
really
important
and
it's
a
lot
more
aligned
with
how
I
see
this.
I
actually
see
this
group
of
seven
people
have
a
commitment
not
just
to
execute
but
to
be
the
people
most
concerned
with
the
strategy
and
the
well
use
of
this,
so
they
should
be
people
that
are
knowledgeable.
A
You
know
on
and
care
about
this
subject
and
will
be
doing
sort
of
research,
gathering
understanding
the
what's
available
in
the
space
and
probably
the
people
that
are
going
to
submit
the
proposals
for
how
to
use
it.
So
I
I
look
at
this
group
of
people
as
people
who
do
have
responsibility
beyond
just
saying
just
doing
the
sig.
A
I
think
it
would
be
a
vast
use
of
talent
and
skill
if
we
were
just
to
say,
here's
seven
people
and
all
they
do
is
wait
for
a
proposal
and
then
do
the
multi-sig
to
release
the
funds.
I
actually
think
we
should
have
a
group
of
people
who
are
very
strategic
and
will
and
will
actually
put
together
the.
Why
are
you
guys
laughing?
Is
it
something
that's
grandfathered.
A
Is
somebody
that
has
like
the
mandate
to
to
actually
come
up
with
proposals
because
they're
they
have
their?
You
know
fingers
on
the
pulse
or
thumb
on
the
pulse
or
whatever
you
say,
and
that
if
we
just
wanted
people
to
sit
by
and
do
nothing
except
do
a
multi-sig
once
in
a
while,
it
would
be
we
shouldn't
even
do.
It,
then,
is
what
I
think.
A
Okay,
but
there
must
be
some
sort
of,
but
I
guess
there's
I
agree.
I
agree
and
that's
here
the
before
allocating
tokens
so
prerequisite
right
for
allocating
tokens
as
a
snapshot
by
tch
token
holders
and
that
but
and
then
there's
like
this
emergency
clause
right
like
if
there
is
a
compelling
reason
to-
and
that's
that's
tricky
actually
like.
What's
the
guideline
for
an
emergency
case,
if
there's
like
a
loss
of
funds
like
I
guess,
that's
the
emergency
case
right.
A
Risk
of
l
exactly
so,
if
there's
any
use
case
where,
like
there
will
be
a
loss
of
funds,
if
there's
not
an
emergency,
something
transacted,
then
that
would
be
something
that
this
group
can
do
on
their
own,
but
then
have
the
clear.
Like
then
there's
like
this
postmortem
that's
produced
for
the
community
to
understand
what
happened.
C
Just
have
one
thing
to
say
like
like
also
like:
if
someone
who
is
outside
of
this
group
of
people
propose
something
and
pass,
I
think
we
should
even
do
it
like,
even
if
the
people
who
are
who
have
to
sign
for
some
reason
they
do
not
agree
but
inside
the
parameters
like
the
community,
decide
to
do
that
like
they
should
do
that
like
it's.
What
the
community
wants.
A
A
The
funnel
looks
like
anyone
can
make
a
proposal.
It's
open.
Probably
this
group
will
be
making
proposals
because
they
have
the
interest
in
this
and
then
anything
that
gets
approved,
they're
required
to
execute.
They
don't
have
the
ability
to
say
no,
we
don't
really
like
agave.
A
A
Yeah,
it's
I
don't
know
what
we
call
that.
What
are
you
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
worry
about
the
name
now.
B
A
A
So
maybe
we
get
to
writing
then
now,
actually,
while
we
have
griff
here,
maybe
we
have
a
conversation.
I
don't
know
how
long
you
can
stay
with
us.
So
while
I
know
you're
present,
let's
have
a
conversa,
oh
excellent.
Let's
have
a
conversation
around
the
number
zepty
wanted
to
to
raise
some
questions
around
it,
and
maybe
it's
not
a
bad
instance
for
us
to
do
some.
What
are
the
advantages
and
disadvantages
of
higher
and
lower?
A
So
you
voiced
in
the
in
the
last
one
that
you
think
as
high
as
possible,
like
higher
higher
over
lower
favors
higher
over
lower,
and
then
I.
E
Guess
within
these
numbers,
yeah
like
if
it's
200
or
300,
I
I
vote
300,
because
the
money
goes
back
into
the
curve
and
the
in
the
in
the
thing
I
mean
the
the
benefits
are
hey,
we
get
more
tokens
right.
That's
that's
the
big
benefit.
The
con
is
that
the
bonding
curves
reserve
ratio
will
be
a
little
bit
higher.
E
So
we'll
have
a
little
bit
more
slippage
in,
like
we'll
have
less
liquidity
by
default
in
the
design
of
the
curve,
and
it's
like
we
have
infinite
liquidity,
but
still
the
price
is
likely
to
change
more.
The
the
slippage.
E
B
E
Yeah
and
and
and
in
general,
the
curve
steepness
will
be
higher,
so
the
slippage
will
be
higher
forever.
You
know
and.
E
We
can
work
around
it
if
it
was
if,
if
there
was
200
300
400
500,
I
wouldn't
be
saying:
oh
the
higher
the
better
you
know
like
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know,
but
I
think
that
we
can
get
away
with
it
and
I
think
the
value
of
having
these
tokens
like
being
able
to
buy
these
tokens
at
the
cheapest
possible
price
is
really
valuable
as
long
as
we
hold
them
for
a
month
like,
I
really
really
think
that
it's
important
to
recognize
the
price
can
actually
only
go
up,
which
is
crazy.
E
You
know
the
number
can
only
go
up.
This
is
a
very
unheard
of
kind
of
situation,
so
I
hope
that
with
these
tokens
that
we're
not
so
hot
to
trot
to
make
trades
with
other
communities
right
away,
because
our
token
will
only
go
up.
So
if
we
hold
for
a
little
bit,
we
can
like,
like
if
we
hold
for
a
month
or
two
or
basically
like
halfway
through
the
token
freeze
and
do
it,
then
you
know-
or
you
know
then
we'll
have
more
money
there.
E
So
that
would
be
good
to
make
trades
to
make
yeah
for
the
lp
trades
or
we
wouldn't.
We
wouldn't
sell
this
yeah.
We
never
sell
it,
but
you
know
but
effectively
we
are
selling
it
kind
of
when
we're
trading.
A
E
A
E
A
Would
we
would
have
some
set
of
tokens
that
we
could
then
sell
for
the
lowest
price
or,
like
us,
a
small
difference
like
under
the
current
value
right
advantage
for.
E
And
then
under
the
current
value
would
be
more
than
what
we
paid.
If
the
longer
we
wait
so
and
then
we
can
also
just
put
that
money
back
into
the
conviction,
voting
pool
you
know
when
we're
selling
it,
we
can
sell
it
for
conviction,
voting,
pool
money,
not
bonding,
curb
money,
which
is
super
cool,
common
pool,
yeah,
the
common
pool.
So
oh
nice
shirt
thanks.
E
E
Yeah
out
of
the
hatch
funds,
which
effectively
steals
from
the
bonding
curve
and
conviction
a
little
bit
of
both
yeah
and
the
biggest
con
is,
but
that
we
can't
undo
is
the
price
floor.
But
if
we're
holding
some
of
the
tokens
we're
creating
kind
of
a
new
price
floor
right.
So
if
the
dow
itself
is
trading
tc
for
honey
and
then
holding
a
honey
token
holding
a
honey
pool
token,
then
that's
its
own
price
floor
right
there
right,
because
those
tc
will
never
be
sold.
They'll
just
be
sitting
in
in
the
tec
coffers.
E
So
the
price
floor
is
what
of
what
definitely
gets
impacted.
So
like
okay,
let's
imagine
we
do
the
initial
buy
right.
So
we
designed
the
token
economy
and
the
price
floor
is
set
at
a
dollar
fifty,
but
then
we
actually
buy
tokens.
We
buy
300k
worth
of
tokens
and
then
we
raise
the
price
floor.
Well
then,
we
raise
the
price
20
cents
right.
E
If
we
would
have
just
had
the
300k
to
design,
maybe
we
would
have
set
the
price
floor
at
a
dollar
seventy
right,
but
and
then,
and
then
the
then
that-
and
if
we
didn't
do
the
initial
buy
at
all,
that
would
have
just
been
a
free-for-all
and
the
price
is
going
to
be
a
dollar
seventy
minimum.
No
matter
what,
and
so
that's
like.
That's
where
the
the
direct
like
visible
impact
is:
oh
we're
not.
E
We
don't
have
a
price
floor,
that's
as
strong
anymore,
because
and
it's
like
to
the
speculators
that
might
be
a
little
a
little
scarier.
It's
like.
Oh,
the
dow
has
a
bunch
of
tokens
they
can
sell.
That
could
lower
the
price
you
know,
but
I
would.
I
would
hope
that
a
lot
of
the
issues
here
we
can
mitigate
by
saying
oh
strategic
partners,
we'll
give
it
to
you
cheaper,
but
we're
also
going
to
you
know,
lock
you
in
a
vesting
contract
and
that's
really
easy
to
do.
E
A
It's
okay-
let's,
let's
maybe
move
on
from
that,
then
actually
to
go
to
go
back
to
the
so
these
are,
I
think,
in
the
proposal.
It
would
be
very
nice
for
us
to
explain
to
the
community
advantages
disadvantages
and
all
of
these
these
may
be
caveats
that
we're
discussing
now
to
have
a
whole
picture
of
the
of
this
subject.
A
E
All
the
money
goes
back
into
the
economy,
you
know
like
we
take
300k
out,
we
design
it,
and
then
we
buy
the
tokens
into
the
bonding
curve
and
all
and
then
whatever
the
entry
tribute
is
goes
to
conviction,
voting,
pool
and
sorry
the
common
pool
and
whatever
is
not
entry
attributed,
goes
into
the
bonding
curve.
We're
not
really
it's
like.
We
take
300k
out,
we
make
some
tokens,
give
it
to
ourselves,
and
then
we
put
the
money
back
in
it's
like
it's
almost
like
nothing
happened,
but
we
get
free
tokens.
E
A
Okay,
so
we
have
a
target
date
for
the
26th
okay.
We
still
have
time,
but
I
think.
D
A
Are
gonna
finish
this
here's
what
I
propose
who
feels
comfortable
writing
taking
a
section
of
this
going
into
the
proposal
template,
and
maybe
we
can
look
over
this
proposal
template
so,
oh
an
accurate,
detailed
description,
description
of
what
we're
proposing
first.
E
A
This
is
the
proposal
template
from
the
forum.
I
think
we
go
with
this
if
anyone
thinks
there's
a
better
version,
just
shout
and
then
proposal
details
expected
duration.
How
does
this
help
team
information
skills
funding
information?
Okay,
may
I
ask
if
we
all
go
into
the
proposal:
template
and
I'll
just
try
and
dynamic.
D
A
B
I'm
trying
sorry
I'm
trying
to
load
this
proposal
template
right
here
in
this
section.
B
D
I
I
think
I
can
work
in
the
description
like
an
easy
way
to
to
explain
it
and
yeah.
I
can
work
in
the
description.
A
You
know
what
it
can
be
used
for.
Do
you
want
to.
A
I
think
that
the
way
griff
explained
it
is
pretty
compelling
and
I
would
go
with
300k
unless,
in
our
drafting
of
this
something
comes
up.
That
would
make
us
change
our
mind.
B
I
get
a
bit
skeptical
about
increasing
the
price
slippage
a
lot
because
in
the
end
we
kind
of
lose
out
because
the
price
very
variates
so
much
when
we
do
the
buy-in
my
I
would
choose
250k
just
to
be
in
the
happy
medium.
B
B
B
E
E
E
We
could
we
can
I'll
dm
you
to
schedule
it,
and
I
don't
know
we
can
do
it
in
person.
Walk.
E
B
C
Just
to
make
it
clear
like
when
we
decide
the
funds,
we
are
also
going
to
say
exactly
where
these
funds
are
going
to
be
on
like
because
otherwise
I
think
it's
going
to
be
very
hard
for
me.
Like
say,
like
you
know,
for
example,
we
say
strategic
partnerships,
but
I
cannot
look
at
any
static
partnership
on
right
now,
because
I
have
no
idea
so
yeah.
I
mean,
what's
intention
like
say
like
what
these
funds
are
going
to
be
used
for
but
say
like
it's
going
to
be
decided
by
the
community
on
snapshot
or.
E
Yeah,
I
I
will.
I
personally
would
like
to
see
budgets
how
much
is
going
to
the
reward
committee?
How
much
is
going
to
strategic
partners
that
will
be
sold
for
conviction,
voting,
pool
money?
How
much
is
and
how
much
is
going
to
go
to
you
know,
making
lp
tokens
that
we
hold
trading
with
other
communities
and
just
have
that
like
at
least
percentages,
you
know,
and
that
way
there's
not
like
there's
at
least
some
sort
of
clear.
E
C
Okay,
so
we
say,
like
the
person
touches
but
again
like
on
the
partnership,
especially
I
have
no
idea
like
we
who
should
we
partner,
so
I
should
put
like
an
percent
touch
like
and
then
we,
of
course,
discuss
like
if
should
be
higher
or
lower,
but
have
it
drafted.
C
A
Well,
this
is
very
high
level
right,
it's
sort
of
just
saying
what
is
in
scope
and
what
is
at
a
scope,
we're
not
saying
what
is
otoscope,
but
we're
saying
these
can
be
used
for
strategic
partnerships
that
will
be
voted
on
by
the
community.
If
somebody
makes
a
proposal,
they
can
be
used
for
liquidity
in
second
markets.
We
might
even
find
another
use
case
and
we
know
that
it
can
be
used
by
for
to
fund
the
initial
rewards,
and
we
can
probably
put
a
number
with
that.
A
A
I
am
a
little
bit
more
aligned,
the
other
like
the
pool,
staying
more
having
less
specific
allocations,
because
there
can
be
because
I
think
once
we
have
proposals
for
partnerships
and
liquidity,
it
will
be
obvious
the
advantages
and
disadvantages.
E
What
I
would
say
is
that
if
we
add
percentages,
we
can
propose
to
change
them
later.
If
there's,
if
one
of
the
things
is
not
as
good
as
we
want,
you
know,
then,
like.
E
A
E
A
E
C
Okay,
but
I
also
was
thinking
more
on
the
yeah.
I
was
aligning
more
like
what
you
were
saying
tom
like
I
feel
if
this
money
is
not
going
to
be
managed
by
them,
but
by
the
community,
it's
I
feel
like
the
percentage
lost
their
meaning
of
it,
so
the
community
will
decide
what
they
want
to
do
at
any
moment.
C
A
I
think
there's
like
there's
a
lot
that
the
community
can
contribute,
but
I
feel
like
we
can
also
make
sure
that
we
have
groups
of
focus.
Groups
and
expert
groups
is
not
the
right
word,
but
groups
of
people
that
are
focused
on
one
thing
versus
waiting
for
the
community
to
deliver
something.
You
know.
I
think
that
it's
sort
of
a
combination
of
those
two
that
make
that
give
us
strength.
B
The
reward
board
yeah,
so
you
mean
from
from
buy-in
what
percentage
of
those
t's
is
going
to
them.
Yeah.
We
don't
know
that.
C
B
C
Yeah,
like
80k,
like
less
than
one
100k
like
80
80k
like
or
60
like
yeah,
since
you're,
the
one
who's
more
involved.
I
I
feel
interesting
in
you
know
like
what
are
the
the
needs
that
the
reward
system
needs
and
and
yeah
just
give
it
cover
those
needs
for,
like
oh.
E
Yeah,
it's
important
to
know
that
the
amount
of
money
that
we
put
in
is
going
to
go
up
so
because
the
t
so
I
mean
even
just
when
we
buy
it
if
we
buy,
if
the
price
is
a
dollar
fifty
the
price
will
be
a
dollar
eighty
or
something
after
we
buy
it.
So
we'll
already
have
some.
You
know,
increase
it'll,
be
worth
more
than.
E
B
C
C
Yeah
I
mean
yeah.
The
intention
is,
if
you
we
know
this
like,
then
we
can
decide.
You
know
like
okay,
this
reward
needs
to,
for
I
don't
know.
I
was
thinking
this
buying
like
for
six
seven
months
of
the
launch.
I
mean
I
feel
like
this
covers,
like
the
the
starting
of
the
commons.
E
Well,
no,
I
mean
this
money
won't
go
to
salaries.
The
and
the
reward
system
will
be
rewarding
a
lot
of
people.
The
the
most
the
people
that
we're
the
common
stack
is
rewarding
will
get
their
money
from
the
conviction.
Voting
pool
because
they'll
be
making
like
you're
going
to
make
a
transparency,
working
group
proposal
and
that'll
come
from
conviction.
Voting
that'll
come
from
the
common
pool.
C
B
So
basically
like
what
I
understood
before
was
people
were
foregoing
impact
hours
in
favor
of
regular
payments
right.
So
those
people
who
still
have
those
same
agreements
are
getting
paid
out
from
the
common
pool,
but
then
new
contributors
or
non-regular
contributors
are
going
to
be
getting
most
of
the
rewards
from
this
system
or
compensation.
I
guess
you
could
say.
B
B
C
C
C
C
E
B
A
B
It
would
be
the
same
way
that
I
guess
the
working
groups
request
funds
right,
so
we
need.
We
need
these
funds
for
the
reward
system
and
this
much
and
then
basically
we
take
out
that
that
x
die
value.
We
convert
it
on
the
bonding
curve
and
then
we
hold
it
in
the
in
the
sub-dial
and
then
when
we
need
to
pay
out.
We
take
that
amount
and
we
just
distribute
it.
E
E
Might
you
know
but
yeah.
C
But
our
intention
like
what
we,
what
do
we
expect
like
if
the
funds
we
run
out
of
funds
in
six
months,
that
would
be
failure.
That
would
be
success
like
yeah.
It
would
be
beneficial
to
know
like
what
would
be
failure
and
what
would
be
success
indeed,
in
a
period
of
time,.
B
I
would
say
give
them
a
period
of
three
months,
at
least
for
the
this
reward
board
to
kind
of
like
organize
itself
and
then
to
be
able
to
successfully
start
making
proposals
to
the
common
pool
so
like
that
would
be
good.
Six
is
good,
but
I'm
like
I'm
looking
at
the
figure.
It's
like
k,
five
to
six
k,
bi-weekly,
that's
like
10
to
12.,
that's
like
over
100k.
E
B
Like
72k
is
fine
and
like
six
months
I
think
actually
is
a
is
a
good
number,
but
I
would
say
minimum
three
months.
We
want
to
cover
this
thing
for.
E
E
I
I
really
think
that
what
olympus
dow
is
doing
is
just
better
than
yield.
Farming
just
have
the
doubt,
buy
liquidity,
don't
don't
rent
it.
You
know
this
like.
I
feel
like
the
idea
of
yield.
Farming
is
like
a
great
way
to
launch
with
liquidity
and
get
get
a
price,
but
after
launch
you
should
just
be
accumulating
liquidity
yourself
as
a
down,
but
I
think,
and
then
holding
are
you
driving
and
like
buying
a
house
first
renting
an
apartment.
E
D
C
C
A
B
Yeah,
I
I
agree
with
griff
and
I
think
there's
some
value
in
creating
secondary
market
liquidity
so
that
we
can
kind
of
profit
off
of
the
same
arbitrage
thing
that
he
was
he's
been
talking
about.
E
I
mean
in
the
end,
with
our
exit
tributes.
Most
people
will
not
be
buying
in
and
out
of
the
bonding
curve
they
will
actually
be
buying
into
secondary
markets
if
they're
just
buying
a
little.
It's
only
when
the
slippage
is
so
great
on
secondary
markets
that
they'll
actually
go
to
the
bonding
curve
or
when
you
know
the
secondary
markets,
price
dips,
then
there's
an
arbitrage
opportunity.
B
Anyway,
but
yeah,
I
wonder
if
we're
getting
off
on
a
tangent,
but
that's
the
thing
that
I
see
a
lot
more
value
in
doing
versus
making
a
big
chunk
go
to
the
reward
system.
B
C
Yeah,
I
was
thinking
okay,
we're
going
to
buy
liquidity
and
okay
we're
on
next
time.
I
feel
it
makes
sense
to
have
liquidity
on
honey
for
sure
and
do
we
want
to
get
liquidity
on
every
garden?
Let's
say
like
brightly
agave
give
it
or
we
prefer
just
to
concentrate
more
in
honesty,
liquidity
everywhere.
What
what
yeah?
It's.
E
Probably
better
to
focus
our
liquidity
efforts.
I
mean
it's
fine
to
do
a
few
token
swaps,
but
we
want
to
definitely
have
a
concentrated
token
swap
because
the
bigger
the
liquidity
pool,
the
more
people
can
use
it
so
like
if
you
just.
If
you
have
multiple
liquidity
pools,
then
you're
you're
kind
of
shooting
yourself
in
the
foot.
You
really
want,
like
one
big
liquidity
pool.
E
C
E
C
C
B
Well,
I
mean
we
could
talk
about
like
making
honey
tec
pool,
or
we
could
just
talk
about
straight
up,
doing
tc
and
eth.
You
know
which
wouldn't
be
a
strategic
partnership.
It
would
just
be
more
about
like
playing
the
market.
B
D
I
I
want
to
share
what
I've
been
working
on
and
it's
in
the
proposal
information
I
want
to
know
if,
like
this
idea,
is
well
explained
and
yeah,
if
yeah,
you
think
I
I
think
the
resistant
people
that
get
confused
with
the
bonding
court.
So
I
encourage
like
to
make
it
the
the
easiest
to
understand
puzzle.
I
I
I
think
I
made
an
effort
to
do
it
so
yeah.
I
would.
I
would
like
to
have
your
your
eyes
on
that.
I'm.
A
D
A
I
I
I
have
a
four
o'clock.
I
have
to
jump
on.
A
C
D
Yeah
I
made
like
a
small
image
that
says
like
by
here,
explain
by
them
yeah
and
I
I
think
it's
more
or
less
accurate.
So
it's
it
can
help
people
to
to
to
understand
what
we're
talking
about
just
yeah.
B
B
Oh
well,
I
think
it's
cool.
I
feel
like
having
another
meeting
right
now,
but
it
could
be
wrong.
C
I
have
to
just
before
we
go
like
I
would
like,
so
we
sing
and
say:
okay,
we
are
like
we're
now
splitting
like
more
or
less
what
we're
gonna
do,
but
we
should
have
also.
Maybe
we
need
another
meeting
to
make
this
proposal
available
on
the
forum
like
or
where
are
we
going
to
handle
it
like?
C
C
B
I
think
we
should
well
what
really
needs
to
happen
is
there
needs
to
be
somebody
who
will
own
this
document
and
make
it
consistent,
because
if
you
have
three
to
four
different
people,
writing
different
pieces
of
it
like
we're.
Not
all
gonna
write
it
in
the
same
way,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
this
might
be
independent
decision
making
for
some
of
the
nitty
gritty
stuff,
but
that's
not
ideally
how
a
proposal
should
be
made.
B
So
I
don't
know
if
anyone
feels
comfortable
like
everyone
like
their
sections
and
then
we
call
it
done.
Then
we
do
qa
and
somebody
like
goes
through
and
makes
it
consistent.
E
B
Okay,
do
we
have
a
channel
where
I
can
ping
people
for
this
stuff
like?
Should
we
do
it
in
stewards
or.
D
Hello,
guys,
sorry
are.