►
From YouTube: W20 Legal WG: Proposal terms, praise and IH distribution terms, Dandelion voting terms
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Plans for the weekend
4:58 - Dandelion voting terms
21:51 - Juan's paragraph in the Praise Distribution terms
24:43 - New areas of discussion for Proposal terms
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Actually,
I
don't
have
anything
planned
this
weekend,
so
it's
kind
of
boring
for
me,
but
just
the
plan
for
weekend
tomorrow
I
will
have
to
work.
I
will
do
the
pre-squan
session
with
griff
and
yeah,
because
it's
my
evening
for
them
it's
my
morning.
So
that's
the
plan
for
tomorrow
and
then
on
sunday,
I'm
just
gonna
chill
at
the
beach.
C
D
Later
today
I
will
go
to
my
parents
house
and
I
will
stay
there
for
the
weekend.
That's
like
my
weekend's
plan,
and
here
we
will
continue
with
the
lockdown
for
three
weeks
more,
so
it's
just
like
no
nothing
stay
in
the
house
and
and
that's
why
I
only
visit
my
parents
at
the
weekends
and
how
about
yousef.
Could
you
deliver
the
piece
of
your
computer.
E
Oh,
no,
they
still
it's
still
there
maybe
yeah
this
box,
this
box
yeah
but
yeah
they
didn't
came
yet
and
yeah.
I'm
just
waiting
at
this.
I
fixed
everything
I
had
to
fix
and
yeah
the
plus
the
weekend
is
suppressed.
I
just
need
to
rest
like
this.
Computer
is
driving
me
crazy
and
yeah
no
distractions.
First
thing
to
join.
F
A
Santi,
thank
you
sean.
I
think
the
guy
that
picks
your
computer
I'll
also
fix
your
hair
jetty.
E
A
All
right,
not
too
many
plans
for
this
weekend.
I
I
had.
A
A
E
A
A
A
Okay!
If
I,
if
I
run
into
problems,
you
guys
may
have
to
to
keep
moving
forward
without
me,
there's
the
agenda.
There's
one
issue
and
let
me
know
if,
if
you
hear
me
correctly,
there's
this
issue
that
we
need
to
introduce,
which
is
conviction
voting
during
the
hatchdown.
A
It's
that
the
terms
for
the
voting
when
the
hatched
out
is
already
created
and
we
need
to
migrate
into
the
final
now,
okay,
that
that
specific
period
of
time
when,
hopefully
there
will
be
only
one
proposal
and
they
will
be,
there-
will
be
the
voting
of
migrating
to
the
final
down.
Okay,
I
don't
I
don't
know
if
we
discussed
this.
A
If
we
need
terms
for
that
or
not
on
the
on
the
stores
meeting,
I
was
reviewing
the
zen
hop
and
there
is
an
issue
for
that,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
we
need
to
have
any
terms.
For
that.
I
recall
I
remember
that
grief
said
that
all
the
the
deployment
is
gonna
is
gonna,
go
through
through
a
tornado
cache,
so
no
one's
gonna
know
who's,
deploying
all
the
all.
The
all
the
smart
contracts,
but
there
will
be
someone
who
will
post
the
proposal
and
all
of
us
will
vote
on
that
proposal.
F
A
Because
if,
for
any
reason
I
don't
know,
we
create
a
proposal
and
then
right
away,
it
doesn't
pass
because
some
people
just
leaves
the
the
dow
because
they
want
to
get
their
money
back
because
for
any
reason
anything
can
happen.
So
there
may
there
may
be
several
votings
of
proposals
and
the
corresponding
votings
and
there's
the
prop
the
peop,
the
person
or
the
account
that
creates
the
proposal
and
there's
the
rest
of
the
people
who
the
rest
of
the
accounts
who
voted.
A
So
if
you
want
to
give
a
thought,
we
may
not
need
any
anything,
but
but
let's
just
give
it
some
thoughts
and-
and
I
can
share
that
with
grief.
Also,
that's
I'm
not
it's
not
here
today,
but
we
have
libby
here,
hello
vivi,
I
don't
know
if
you
we,
we
were
we're
talking
about
this
issue
on
the
stewart's
meeting
last
wednesday,
and
I
think
we've
discussed
this
sometime
before
we've
talked
about
this.
Before
do
you
know?
G
So
you're
saying
about
the
voting
period
in
conviction,
voting
that
no.
E
F
So
I
I
just
don't
know
if
I'll
think
about
it,
but
I
don't
think
there's
need
for
terms
because,
ultimately
you
don't
we're
not
gonna,
know
who's
deploying
the
contract.
F
F
A
A
smart
contract
that
are
deployed
by
no
one
known
right,
right
and
everything
set
up.
Then
anyone
in
the
dow
any
member
of
the
doll
which
will
be
all
the
hatcher's
will
have
the
ability
to
set
up
a
proposal,
launch
a
proposal
paying
the
target
fees
and
everything
that
we
set
up
on
on,
which
which
will
be,
of
course
specifically
designed.
So
no
one
messes
around
all
right,
but
hopefully
there
will
be
one
proposal
which
will
be
the
proposal
that
we've
discussed
before
launching
the
dow
just
to
migrate
into
the
conviction.
Voting
final
right.
A
So
there's
one
person
that
posts
the
proposal
and
then
there's
the
voters.
That's
the
process
that
could
be
several
times
in
the
event
that
the
proposal
for
any
reason
we
decide
to
just
discard
it
or
it
doesn't
pass
or
whatever,
and
we
have
to
go
through
another
proposal,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
there
will
be
proposal,
people
putting
proposals
and
the
rest
of
people
voting
them.
That's
that's
the
process.
I
don't
know
if,
in
that
specific
act
in
those
actions,
we
need
to
run
into
any
kind
of
terms
like
we
have.
F
I
I
get,
I
get
the
impetus
behind
it,
but
I
I'm
not
sure
there's
a
reason
to
to
add
additional
terms.
I
get
it
because,
obviously
there's
a
concern
that
there'll
be
some
competing
proposal
that
not
just
is
out
there
but
garner's
community's
support
or
that
the
proposal
people
expect
to
pass
the
the
upgrading
to
conviction,
voting
and
augmenting
bond
curve,
for
whatever
reason
doesn't
pass,
and
I
get
both
of
those
issues.
It
would
be
nice
if
celeste
was
already
around
because
then
you
could
conceivably.
F
You
know
if
that
proposal
passed,
you
could
challenge
it.
E
G
F
And
then
you
know
it
it's
just
going
to
come
down
to
a
fight,
but
I
don't
I'll
think
about
it,
but
I
just
don't
think
there's
any
terms
that
are
there
to
protect
people
in
the
event
the
community
veers
off
in
a
direction,
that's
unexpected,
but
let
me
think
about
it
santee,
but
I
I
my
instinct
is
to
say
no
it's
at
some
point.
It's
just
a
matter
of
faith
that
the
community
is
going
to.
F
I
just
don't
know
if
there's
a
document
or
a
term
that
can
say
other
than
the
fact
that
we've
repeated
in
a
few
different
documents
hey.
This
is
what
we
think
is
going
to
happen.
This
is
what
we
would
like
to
happen,
but
I
don't
think
we
can
force
it
to
happen
or
or
contractually
obligated
to
happen.
A
A
I
think
we
probably
covered
from
the
the
the
hatch
terms
that
first
document
that
we
finished,
but
we
we
may.
We
may
want
to
take
a
look
at
that
document
and
see
we
need
to
add
some
sentence
there.
Just
making
reference
to
this.
You
know
process
of
migrating
from
the
hatch
into
the
into
the
final
now.
F
I
I'll
definitely
look
at
it
and
I
think
probably
the
strongest
thing
we
can
do
is
just
say
look.
This
is
what
the
expectations
are,
but
you
short
of
literally
creating
a
contract
that
every
hatcher
signs
amongst
themselves
like
it
would
have
to
be
between
everyone.
That
conceivably
has
a
t-e-c-h
token
that
says
when
this
proposal,
who
knows
who's
going
to
make
it,
but
someone
is
probably
going
to
make
a
proposal
that
upgrades
the
hashed
out
to
the
common
style
and
we
all
agree
to
vote
for
it
short
of
a
contract
like
that.
F
I'm
I'm
just
not
sure
what
a
document
it
can
do.
I
mean
it
I'll
think
about
it.
I
get
it,
but
I'm
not
sure
there's
much
we
can
do
but
I'll
take
a
look
at
the
hatch
terms
and
see.
If
we
can,
you
know
at
the
very
least
kind
of
say:
hey
look
is
what
the
expectation
is.
This
is
what
we
think
is
going
to
happen,
and-
and
this
is
certainly
what
the
the
community
expectation
is
at
this
point
in
time.
Okay,
do
you
want
anything
there.
G
That's
why
we
have
a
doubt
that
people
can
take
the
decision
that
they
want
and
I
think
the
protection
they
have
is
already
the
rage
quit
mechanism
that
if
there
is
a
proposal
that
they
don't
like
and
they
don't
feel
comfortable
with,
they
can
just
leave
and-
and
the
only
thing
they
should
know
is
that
they,
if
they
choose
to
leave
there,
might
be
a
fee
that
will
be
decided
by
the
parameters
right
off
like
the
the
exit
tribute.
So
maybe
this
should
be
explicit
somewhere.
Okay,.
A
C
Yeah,
it's
it's
really
hard,
because
it's
always
about
context
or
we
we're
talking
about
during
the
hatch
dial
right.
A
Right
well
we're
I'm
I'm
referring
to
that
issue
that
we
that
we
saw
during
last
wednesday
meeting
about
dandelion,
boring
only
legal
terms
of
tandemillion
voting
and
the
only
the
million
voting
that
I
see
well,
there's
two
of
them
the
one
to
move
the
hatched
out
to
the
final
commenting
bonding
curve
dial
or
the
voting
to
change.
The
parameters
of
of
the
dow,
which
I
believe
is
gonna,
be
dandelion
voting
right.
C
Yep
and-
and
I
mean
the
dow
can
do
anything
right,
because
the
dao
itself
could
just
vote
to
start
spending
money
on
stuff.
But
it's
very
unlikely.
I
think
we've
done
a
good
job
with
our
culture
and
the
expectations
of
what
we're
going
to
do
to
be
able
to
be
able
to
pull
off
the
commons
upgrade,
but
yeah.
A
A
F
Right
I'll
think
about
it,
santi
you
know.
Obviously
I
think
what
you're
what
you're
really
getting
at
whether
it's
a
legal
document-
and
I
agree
with
libby
that
there's
something
incongruent
with
with
the
spirit
of.
H
F
F
So
I
get
that
whether
that's
best
solved
through
a
a
document
or
whether
that's
best
solved
through
setting
the
terms
of
making
a
proposal
in
such
a
way
that
it
discourages
right,
because
if
you
said,
if
you
set
the
fee
high
enough
on
making
a
proposal,
then
it
it
makes
it
a
little
difficult
or
at
least
less
likely
that
you
get
a
lot
of
competing
proposals
and
and
certainly
less
likely,
you'll
get
ones.
That
kind
of
fundamentally
change
the
parameters.
F
But
I'll
take
a
look
santi
and
I
I
get
like
I
said,
I
get
the
concern
and
it
feels
like
this
is
something
that's
going
to
kind
of
constantly
be
there
right.
I
mean.
C
C
That's
what
I
wanted
to
say
is
that
the
conditions
I
mean
the
only
difference
between
the
hatched
out
on
this
on
this
like
level
for
like
changing
parameters
and
proposals
that
can
you
know
change
the
economy
of
the
dao
is
that
we
replace
the
rage
quit
functionality
with
a
bonding
curve,
but
otherwise
for
the
people.
The
effect,
the
like
concept,
is
almost
the
same.
C
It's
just
different
mechanisms
to
execute
them
so
whatever,
if
we,
if
we
write
these
terms
and
focus
on
these
terms
for
the
dandelion
down,
they
will
be
the
exact
same
for
the
disputable
voting
and
commons
upgrade
doubt
that
we
limit
with
so
it's
it's
kind
of
useful
to
just
like
focus
on
them
now
get
them
get
them
out,
because
we
will
absolutely
need
them
for
the
final
product.
A
A
Last
week
we
almost
finished
with
the
the
terms
for
the
distribution
of
tokens
from
spread
or
praise
or
any
other
method
that
we
might
introduce
in
the
future.
I
think
you
have
to
take
a
couple
of
you.
You
we
ended
up
say.
I
think
I
recall
that
you
ended
up
saying
that
you
had
to
take
a
couple
of
look
a
couple
of
sentences.
There
did
you
have
a
chance
to
do.
A
F
In
the
praise
and
distribution,
one,
I'm
pretty
sure
I
made
any
changes
we
needed
to
make
there
I'll
go
back
and
double
check.
I
keep
pretty
thorough
notes,
so
I'll
go
back
and
double
check,
but
this
week
I
spent
the
most
time
in
the
the
terms
for
the
proposals.
That's
yeah.
G
F
That's
where
I
went
through
and
was
really
looking
at
how
one
hive
does
a
lot
of
that
stuff.
So
that's
that's
where
I
spent
okay.
A
Let's,
let's
keep
that
document
just
let's
leave
it
almost
ready.
You
take
a
final
look
at
it
during
the
week.
If
there
is
no
changes,
we
can
consider
that
it's
finished
and-
and
you
also
will
think
about
of
of
the
terms
for
voting-
we
can
discuss
that
next
next
week
and
let's
focus
now
on
on
the
on
the
new
discussion
or
the
new,
the
new
areas
of
discussion
for
the
proposal
terms
all
right.
So
let
me
share
screen
with
you
guys,
santi.
D
I'm
sure
last
week
I
had
to
to
to
prepare
a
paragraph
for
the
praise
distribution
and
I
I
like
I
made
it
for
the
proposals,
but
I
I
want
to
share
the
one
that
I
that
I
wrote
for
the
price
distribution
before.
D
It's
in
the
phrase
impact
our
distribution
disclaimer,
and
here
it
comes.
There
are
several
mutual
accountability
methods
in
place
in
the
dec
here
is
linked
to
the
mutual
accountability
methods
that
sept
went
through
voting
in
the
in
the
forum.
D
Our
community
is
very
open
and
loving,
so
active
contributors
can
request
praise
powers
to
participate
in
distribution
of
impact
hours
or
suggest
complementary
mechanisms
like
source
credit,
to
improve
the
way.
We
recognize
the
diversity
of
contributions,
also
in
the
in
the
transparency
audits.
The
steroids
of
each
working
group
are
suggested
to
be
accountable
to
its
contributors
by
itself
evaluating
the
praise
given
for
the
activities
related
to
the
development
of
the
goals.
Manifesto
roadmap
milestones
and
different
issues.
A
A
Great,
so
then,
you
just
take
a
final
review
on
that
on
these
on
these
terms,
for
distribution
and
and
and
unless
you
provide
anything
that
needs
to
be
changed,
we'll
just
leave
it
leave
it
there
and
get
it
get
it
finished,
give
it
finished
all
right,
let's
jump
into
the
proposals,
the
proposal
terms.
F
Okay,
so
let's
just
go
down
to
proposal
creator
and,
like
I
said,
I
pulled
a
lot
of
this
from
the
way
one
hive
works
and
I
highlighted
a
couple
of
areas
that
I'll
go
through,
as
as
I
kind
of
cover
the
section.
F
So
obviously
tc
is
a
community
driven
dell
and
that
the
governance
will
basically
operate
through
suggestions
and
proposals.
One
hike
breaks
up
in
their
I'll
call
them
all
proposals.
They
break
it
up
into
two
types:
suggestions
and
proposals,
proposals
ask
for
money
and
suggestions.
F
Don't
at
least
that's
my
understanding,
and
so
the
next
paragraph
then
goes
into
before
community
members
make
a
suggestion
or
proposal
that
they
first
go
to
the
discord,
server
or
forum,
I'm
not
sure
if
we
want
to
list
both
or
primarily
direct
people
to
one
to
discuss
the
suggestion
or
proposal
first
in
order
to
get
feedback
from
the
community
prior
to
formalizing.
That
suggestion
or
proposal
also
there'll
be
a
I'm
imagining,
because
one
hype
has
this:
that
we
may
want
to
have
a.
F
A
kind
of
draft
proposal
where
people
can
fill
in
how
it
will
look,
because
I
think
it
just
streams,
lines
things
and
kind
of
keeps
a
focus,
so
then
moving
into
suggestions.
F
F
But
at
least
my
understanding
is
suggestions,
don't
really
function,
the
same
way
as
proposals
they're,
not
sitting
there
they're
not
giving
out
money
and
they
ultimately
don't
even
there's
no
moment
where
they
pass
or
don't
pass
they
either.
They
either
just
have
support
or
they
don't
have
support,
and
so
if
there
need
to
be
changes
to
kind
of
the
governance.
My
understanding
is
that
those
happen
through
suggestions,
as
opposed
to
proposals.
F
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
distinction
that
makes
a
difference
and
we
could
probably
just
describe
everything
as
a
proposal
and
lose
this
distinction
between
the
two,
but
again
because
this
is
kind
of
the
way
one
hype
did
it.
This
was
kind
of
my
my
frame
of
reference
for
this
moving
down
to
proposals.
F
Obviously,
proposals
are
requests
from
the
tec.
Community
should
distribute
to
distribute
a
tec
tokens
from
the
common
pool
in
terms
of
the
attributes.
This
is
something
we
talked
about
before,
whether
or
not
there's
going
to
be.
G
Say
yeah
just
want
to
say
something
about
the
suggestion
part
before
we
move
along,
so
the
suggestion
would
be
kind
of
like
a
signaling
proposal
and
something
we've
been
trying
to
do
is
to
move
signaling
proposals
out
of
out
of
the
dao
and
towards
the
forum,
or
even
using
token
log,
so
using
different
tools.
So
we
don't
have
this
problem
of
using
support
that
could
be
going
to
other
proposals
that
do
need
that
tool
like
financial
proposals
and
putting
into
signaling
proposals,
since
we
have
other
better
tools
to
do
that.
A
But
we
still
have
to
consider
the
abstain
proposal.
Do
you?
Do
you
get
the
point
of
that
proposal?
Sean.
F
So
I've
seen
it
santi,
I'm
not
sure
I
understand
what
it
is,
but
it
looks
like
it's
a
at
least
my
reference
to
it.
Every
time
I've
seen
it.
It
just
looks
like
a.
I
guess.
The
emoji
would
be
an
unhappy
face
like
when,
when
people
are
supporting
an
abstain
proposal,
it
just
seems
like
there's
a
general
unhappiness.
F
No,
but
I
know
like
what's
going.
Okay,
specifically
in.
A
A
Yeah,
okay,
so
it's
a
way
to
make
it
harder
to
proposals
for
proposals
to
pass
like
bringing
up
the
minimum.
You
know
the
minimum.
I've
got
the
name
of
the
term,
the
minimum
level
that
you
that
you
have
to
reach
in
order
to
pass
that
proposal.
So
when,
when
let's
say
people
in
the
in
the
dao
considers
that
the
levels
to
pass
a
proposal
are
too
low,
and
you
don't
like
that,
you
may
put
some
of
your
voting
into
the
abstain
proposal
to
try
to
force
that
that
level
to
to
be
raised.
A
F
That
has
to
be
there
okay,
so
maybe
what
I'll
do
then
and
and
libby
may
want
to
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
here,
because
I
think
you're
much
stronger
on
the
way
things
function,
I
mean
I
may
point
out
that
signaling
proposals
will
not
occur
in
the
dow
and
rather
are
better
placed
in
places
like
the
discorder
or
a
token
log
or
wherever
and
then
abstain.
Voting,
though,
has
to
remain
and
that
that
will
be
something
that
can
happen
and
that's
obviously
different
than
a
specific
proposal,
because
there's
no
money
request
there.
F
So
that's
that's
fine.
I
can
make
those
changes.
G
Yeah,
it's
not,
we
can't
say,
like
you
can't
do
this.
It's
just
a
recommendation
for
how
to
better
use
the
tools.
So
this
is
not
just
like
dandelion
voting
can
can
manage
funds,
but
we
don't
want
dandelion
voting
to
be
managing
funds,
same
thing
with
conviction.
Voting.
It
can
have
signaling
proposals,
but
we
don't
want
that
to
happen
because
it
will
like
interfere
in
the
best
use
of
that
tool.
G
So
so
it's
just
a
suggestion
to
and
maybe
mentioning
that
there
that,
like
we
suggest
that
for
signaling
means
you
use
this
tool
and
then
yeah,
like
the
the
abstain
proposal
has
to
remain
on
chain
because
it
has
a
purpose
on
chain.
F
Yeah,
so
so
in
terms
of
the
proposal
and
the
way
proposals
will
work
in
one
hive,
I
did
not
see
any
limitations.
I
didn't
see
any
any
amounts
of
money
necessary
to
like
put
down
in
order
to
make
a
proposal.
C
Yeah,
so
I
it's
really
too
bad,
because
one
hive
is
upgrading
to
the
same
contracts
that
we're
going
to
use
this
week.
Probably
so,
they're
going
to
have
these
fees
they're
going
to
have
celeste
and
all
of
that
stuff
they're
in
the
middle
of
upgrading
to
it
right
now
so
yeah
yeah.
So.
F
C
Is
no
it's
going
and
that's
the
other
thing
one
hive
doesn't
really
have
a
lot
of
soft
gov
right.
They
don't
really
have
the
legal
infrastructure
or
the
cultural
we're
we're
we're
setting
some
nice
standards
here
honestly
that.
C
F
C
F
F
C
We
could
probably
try
a
token
log
version
with
the
covenant
where
people
can
write
the
covenant
and
we
can
have
an
open
permission
list
like
thing
like
we're
doing
with
mission
vision,
values
or
we
could
just
you
know,
write
it
and
kind
of
like
vote
on
it
through
another
method,
where
we
don't
do
the
governance
theater
as
pat
says
so
so
yeah
I
I
would
say
that
really
is
up
to
us
is
how
strongly
we
want
to
push
the
legal
stuff
and
well
then.
F
Let
me
let
me
take
a
look
at
that
covenant
then,
because
I
think
the
only
problem
I
had
with
the
wikibeat
testnet
stuff
is,
I
think-
and
this
may
have
been-
I
was
messing
around
with
celeste
as
well,
but
they
may
have
like
the
the
winky
stuff
is
still
up
like.
I
can
still
see
the
documents,
but
you
can't
do
anything
in
it
like
you
can't
get
like
I
don't.
I
don't
even
know.
F
F
C
It's
cool
that
chewy
is
here
because
he
is
our
one
hive,
ambassador,
unofficially,
but
officially
chewie
did
you
ever
figure
out
if
those
test
tokens
still
exist
or
what's
up
with
that.
I
I
never
really
got
back
from
anyone.
I
asked
ricardo
and
and
luke
and
will
and
yeah
I
don't
know-
I
think
I
think
they're
not
using
them
anymore,
but
I'll
yeah
I'll
keep
asking
because
yeah
so
far
I
haven't
got
back
from
anyone.
I
C
And
the
the
other,
the
other
thing
is,
we
can
just
use
it
on
xdi
and
use
the
latest
version.
They
upgraded
their
ux
a
lot.
They
made
a
lot
of
improvements
and
and
for
this
new
deployment
that
they're
upgrading
to-
and
it
just
will
take
what
chewie
d
evan
do
you
have
any
idea
of
when
that
will
be
live,
we'll
be
able
to
play
with
it
on
next.
A
I
It
it
was
supposed
to
take
a
total
of
like
16
days
and
yeah
we're
about
like
halfway.
F
Okay,
well,
if
we're
lucky,
then
then
we'll
have
we'll
have
something.
That's
that's
updated
before
our
next
legal
meeting,
but
at
least
in
in
the
short
term.
I
can
take
a
look
at
the
covenant
and
see
what
can
be
integrated
from
there.
C
Cool
there
this
is
off
topic,
but
sean
we
should
meet
up
on
monday,
I'm
gonna
be
yeah.
F
Yeah
sounds
good
I'll,
try
to
make
it
work
and-
and
you
know,
even
if
I
have
to
come
up
from
orange
county
I'll,
come
up
from
orange
county
amazing
amazing.
You
guys.
C
A
A
All
right,
good,
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
else,
we
want
to
discuss.
No,
so
we
you
take
a
look
at
the
at
the
phrase.
A
The
changes
that
juan
carlos
introduced
and
those
two
little
changes
that
I
recall
that
we
talked
about
last
week
and
you
you
will
take
a
look
at
the
covenant
of
one
hive
to
make
sure
we
can
use
that
and-
and
we
start
thinking
on
the
proposal
terms-
are
not
the
voting
terms
for
the
final
dial,
which
will
also
may
be
useful
for
the
unbillion
voting
in
case.
We
need,
we
want
to
introduce
them
there.
If
not,
we
will
have
them
for
conviction.
Voting
and
that'd
be
that'd,
be
fine.
All.
F
A
All
right,
okay,
thank
you
all
for
for
coming!
It's
a
15-minute
show
today,
which
is
good
every
once
in
a
while
to
have
a
short
meeting
and
let's
meet,
let's
start
during
the
week,
sean
if
you
need,
if
you
need
my
support
and
otherwise,
let's
meet
next
next
friday.
All
right
sounds
good.