►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Plans for the weekend
5:51 - Proposal terms
20:23 - Trademarks and copyrights
27:03 - Other legal documents to be worked on
32:08 - Third party agreements, content ownership, etc.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
C
E
My
plan
for
the
weekend
is
I'm
going
to
I
always
I
try
to
take
saturdays
off.
No,
I
don't
want
to
go
on.
I
don't
know
what
I'm
going
to
do
this
weekend.
I
haven't
actually
gotten
that
far,
but
I
do
know
I'm
going
to
be
proposing
a
lot
of.
I
don't
have
I'm
sure
you
know.
Basically,
on
saturday
I'm
like
oh
hi,
oh
yeah,
that's
right.
I
have
a
girlfriend,
oh
yeah.
What
do
you
want
to
do?
Like?
F
F
G
D
H
H
H
I
I
feel
my
connection
is
a
pretty
bad,
but
I'm
trying
I'll
be
like
saturday.
I
will
have
nothing
planned,
but
on
on
sunday
we
will
go
on
a
natural
research
with
a
friend
of
mine
yeah
in
the
mountains
working
all
day,
like
the
the
worst
part,
I
have
to
wait.
Six
am
morning
which
I
don't
like
to.
I
don't
like
to
wake
up
so
early,
but
yeah.
It
will
be
super
fun
back
to
you.
Sandy.
D
G
D
K
A
K
K
I
even
started
going
back
to
clean
up
some
of
the
language.
I
just
started
cleaning
up
the
language,
but
I
think
we
hit
everything
one
if
you
could
start
scrolling
down
a
little
bit.
These
are
terms
you've
gone
over
before
service
description
proposal.
Creator
we've
talked
about
we're
not
exactly
sure
if,
when
a
proposer
needs
to
do
it
on
discord
or
the
forum,
exactly
what
the
link
will
look
like
clicking
new
proposal,
I'm
assuming
it's
gonna
end
up.
K
K
K
K
G
K
I
highlighted
anything
else
if
people
want
to
suggest
any
other
attributes
of
what
the
proposal
is
going
to
look
like,
I
could
say
I
mean.
Obviously,
there
needs
to
probably
be
a
link
to
the
forum
discussion
on
the
proposal,
but
if
there's
anything
else
just
feel
free
to
put
it
in
a
comment,
and
as
I
go
through
the
document
this
week,
I
will
I
will
get
it
in.
K
We
can
keep
scrolling
down.
This
is
the
community
pledge,
obviously,
as
as
griff
pointed
out
it,
it
would
need
to
be
voted
on
and
it
can't
really
get
voted
on
until
celeste
is
deployed.
Speaking
of
celeste
is
deployed
on
one
hive,
but
they
had
a
little
bit
of
they
did
their
first
vote.
You
know
someone
asked
for
money
from
one
hive,
for
you
know
just
basically
just
asking
for
money
and
they
disputed
it
and
that
seemed
to
work.
K
Fine,
but
a
lot
of
people
that
signed
up
to
use
celeste
were
having
a
hard
time,
and
so
there
were
some
bright
id
issues
and
I
think
they
got
that
all
solved
out
this
week,
so
it
looks
like
celeste
is
like
alive
and
ready
to
go,
but
this
is
the
community
pledge
which
is
similar
to
what
onehive
uses.
I
think
we've
gone
over
this
in
weeks
past,
so
we
can
keep
scrolling
down
here.
Our
standards
we've
gone
through
this
we
can
keep
scrolling
down
one.
K
This
is
all
stuff
we've
gone
over
in
the
past
on
chain
enforcement.
We've
talked
about
the
stuff,
that's
highlighted
is
just
stuff,
we
don't
know
yet
so
whether
or
not
we'll
have
to
stake
a
tec
or
wrapped
x
die,
I
don't
think
has
been
decided
yet
I
mean
yeah.
I
just
don't.
I
don't
know,
what's
going
to
happen
there,
so
that's
highlighted,
but
again,
as
we
get
kind
of
closer,
we'll
be
able
to
fill
that
stuff
out.
K
And
again
I
think
there
there's
the
discussion
on
gravity,
obviously
going
into
requirements
for
proposal.
Obviously
the
form
links
we
don't
want
them
to
be
malicious
aligned
with
the
values
and,
again
that's
more
of
a
reiteration
of
what
was
discussed
above.
But
it's
it
probably
bears
a
little
bit
of
repeating
the
proposal
recipient
into
distribution
of
funds.
K
To
do
that's
my
understanding,
I
could
be
wrong,
but
at
some
point
it
gets
solved
either
the
proposal
gets
pulled
or
the
proposal
moves
forward,
at
which
point
the
smart
contract
is
just
going
to
distribute
the
money
to
the
proposer
or
to
whomever
the
proposer
says
to
distribute
money
to.
I
suppose
you
could
create
a
proposal
that
says
I
could
create
a
proposal
that
says,
give
one
x
number
of
tec
tokens
and,
if
that's
the
case,
then
the
smart
contract
just
executes.
K
That
way,
it's
not
going
to
give
it
to
me
to
give
to
one
we
can
keep
scrolling
down.
So
that's
really
so
everything
up
to
this
point
is
really
the
substantive
stuff.
You
know
90
the
substantive
stuff
of
this
document,
everything
that
kind
of
continues
on
from
here.
I
would
describe,
as
you
know,
kind
of
standard
contract
discussions
about
what
tec
is
not
we've
gone
over
this
before
I
think.
K
Last
week
we
talked
about
payment
gateways,
payment
processors,
we're
not
a
broker,
we're
not
a
charity,
we're
not
a
financial
institution
and
we're
not
a
creditor.
We
can
keep
scrolling
down
through
that
one,
but
this
is.
This
is
really
the
beginning
of
a
lot
of
the
just
standard
legal
stuff,
you'd
see
in
any
document.
G
A
D
K
D
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
I
don't
think
anyone's
going
to
stop
anyone
from
trying
to
do
that.
I
don't
think
anyone
could
try
to
stop
anyone
from
doing
that,
but
you
shouldn't
create
a
tec
side
that
looks
like
tec
and
then
fraudulently
basically
get
people
to
participate
in
a
smart
contract
that
they
actually
think
is
tec,
but
it's
not
actually
too
easy
what
remedies
would
be
available
if
that
were
to
happen,
I
have
no
idea.
K
Maybe
you
could
do
it
in
celeste
and
figure
out
something
to
do
basically
just
like
attack
every
proposal
and
try
to
get
the
word
out
if
they
used
the
last.
Even
but
that's
it
that's
the
end
of
the
document.
That
is
everything
that
I
thought
would
conceivably
need
to
go
in
here.
I'm
not
saying
there
isn't
more!
That
could
go
in
here
and
if
anyone
has
any
suggestions,
I'm
listening,
but
that's
it
about
10
pages
of
legal
stuff,
repeated,
sometimes
ad
nauseum
and
multiple
times,
but
that's.
K
I
E
The
the
challenge
is
that
to
get
a
site
taken
down,
you
generally
have
to
have
a
legal
entity
that
owns
a
trademark,
and
so
the
the
process
for
most
dials
to
interface
with
these
sorts
of
things,
is
to
have
a
service
provider
that
owns
a
trademark
that
work
that
works
for
the
doubt.
So
someone
starts
their
little
company.
The
dow
throws
them.
E
You
know
200
bucks
or
a
thousand
bucks
or
something
to
own
the
trademark,
and
then,
if
anything
comes
up,
you
know
they're
a
trusted
third
party
that
can
be
like
we
own
the
trademark
for
the
tec,
and
you
know
this
website
needs
to
be
taken
down.
Google,
you
know
and
then
google's
like.
Oh
okay,
you
own
the
trademark.
We
do
what
we're
told.
K
K
But
we
don't
really
know
yet
until
we
see
someone
do
it,
what
exactly
it
it's
gonna
look
like
because,
historically
it's
usually
a
company
owns
it
right.
Coca-Cola
owns
their
trademark
and
then,
in
order
to
protect
that
trademark,
they
have
to
go
and
enforce
stuff
all
the
time.
So
they
sue
the
smallest
companies
that
manufacture
or
produce
coke
products
without
a
license
to
do
so,
because
the
only
way
to
protect
a
trademark
is
to
actively
protect
it.
K
So
you
can't
just
let
people
steal
your
trademark
for
years
and
years
and
then
decide
to
enforce
it.
Courts
are
going
to
say
you
didn't.
You
didn't,
try
to
enforce
it
previously,
so
it
kind
of
just
entered
public
domain.
You
know
at
some
point
we
call
things
kleenex,
even
though
that's
a
company
name,
but
it's
not
just
how
we
refer
to
you,
know
tissues
people,
say
xerox
to
make
copies,
but
that
was
a
company
that
was
their
trademark,
but
it
just
entered
the
public
lexicon.
K
So
you
kind
of
have
to
get
out
there
all
the
time
and
and
fight
for
those
trademarks
or
you
risk
losing
them.
But
how
a
dow
will
do
that.
I
don't
know
how
an
open
source
dow
does
it.
Where
there's
just
some
things,
you
don't
really
care
if
other
people
copy
and
some
things
you
do
we'll
have
to
see.
Wyoming
will
will
probably
give
us
a
couple
of
of
examples,
because
you
know
a
few
crippled.
K
K
E
Not
that
I
can
think
of
off
the
top
of
my
head,
I
mean
hopefully
in
a
week
or
two
well
hope
you
know,
it'll
be
more.
Like
things
will
start
to
emerge
and
we'll
have
to
you
know
we
have
a
lot
of
open
threads
that
just
need
the
parameters,
for
instance
to
be
finalized
and
then
they
get
filled
in
and
then
we
probably
do
some
polishing.
E
K
I
I
would
like
to
start
standardizing
some
of
the
like.
We,
we
need
to
probably
know
exactly
what
needs
to
be
filled
in
other
than
going
to
every
legal
document,
so
like
the
hatch
terms
that
are
not
finalized,
yet
you
know
the
terms
here
that
aren't
finalized
the
tec
forum,
which
I
think
operates
with.
I
think,
as
that
letty
pointed
out
a
week
or
two
ago,
has
different
legal
discussions
there.
K
E
Because,
totally
and
github
in
telegram
and
just
like,
go
across
the
mall
and
make
sure
they
all
have
the
same
thing
we
had
this.
We
were
working
on
that
a
long
time
ago
where
there
was
like
an
issue
for
every
platform.
Right
and
it's
like
here
are
all
the
terms.
We
need
legal
gravity
and
sofka
of
all,
to
kind
of
give
it
a
check
and
a
go
so
yeah.
I
think
I
think
you're
absolutely
right.
I
was
just
thinking
the
dow,
but
you
know
what
is
the
contributor
agreement
for
github.
K
Yeah
yeah,
and
so
all
that
I'll
start
looking
this
week
and
start
kind
of
pulling
together
the
because
part
of
it
is
obviously
my
drafting
right,
because
something
I
drafted
a
month
ago
or
two
months
ago,
is
probably
going
to
not
sound
as
confident
about
some
of
the
things.
As
I
may
sound
today
like
if
I
talked
about
celeste
a
month
ago,
I
just
don't
think
I
would
talk
about
it
as
well.
As
I
think
I
can
talk
about
it
today,
which
is
still
not
probably
that
good,
but
better
than
it
was
so.
D
Maybe
one
so
maybe
one
contribution,
I
don't
know
if
the
information
from
libby
and
from
car
would
be
creation
of
all
the
third-party
services
that
we
are
using
like
github
the
forum,
google.
You
know,
I
don't
know
where
the
cert,
where
the
web
page
is
hosted
any
any
single
service
that
we're
using
and
decide
if
we
need
terms
or
not,
and
if
we
do
just
try
to
standardize
the
terms
for
for
for
all
of
them.
J
K
D
E
Well,
we
probably
want
to
control
the
scope.
I
mean
like
we
use
google,
docs
and
google
sheets.
We
use
mirrored
boards,
but
is
there
like?
What
are
we
worried
about?
You
know
like?
Is
there
a
risk
or
is
there
a?
Is
there
some
sort
of
legal
thing,
legal
consideration
that
needs
to
be
made
for
miro
boards?
You
know
like.
K
The
only
thing
I
would
say
is
it:
it
may
be
worth
pointing
out
that
we
don't
control
those
those
third-party
sites
so
that
people's
contributions
there,
you
know
if
they
decide.
You
know.
If
one
of
those
companies
decided
discord,
decides
they're
done
hosting
anything
related
to
crypto
and
they
just
go
through
and
just
erase
it
and
people
get
mad
at
us.
Then
we
see
people
to
say
well,
look
you
were
told
we
don't
control
that
stuff.
D
Well,
I
don't
know
if
it's
yeah,
I
I
see
you're
going
sean.
I
don't
know
if
it's
if
this
should
be
discussed
right
now
here,
but
I
I
remember
from
jake
last
week
mentioning
that
we
were
not
allowed
to
use
all
the
memes
that
he
had
done
in
the
past.
I
don't
know
we
should.
We
should
at
least
write
some
kind
of
agreement
or
term
where
everything
that
anyone
on
the
dow
post
on
any
of
those
third
party
that
we
don't
control,
is
beyond
us
or
something
like.
G
E
And
this
is
why
it's
so
important
to
have
gravity
and
soft,
gov
and
legal
all
in
the
same
place,
because
legal
is
to
protect
our
ass
right
so
like
and
but
then
softcup
is
like
hey,
let's
soften
it,
a
little
bit
like
okay
yeah,
you
know
what,
if
we
use
your
meme,
you
can't
sue
us
like
sorry.
We
have
terms
you
posted
in
the
discord
that
is
now.
You
know
fair,
fair
use
for
our
doubt.
But
of
course,
if
you
say
you
don't
want
us
to
do
it,
we
love
you.
K
Well,
I
I
I
get
the
phrase,
but
I
would
I
would
probably
argue
that
you're
not
really
even
playing
both
sides.
It's
it's.
You
obviously
want
to
protect
yourself
so
that
someone
can't
come
back
and
say
you
know.
If
I
decide
hey
look
all
these
documents,
I
created
for
tec
that
I'm
actually
the
owner
of
them,
because
the
dow
doesn't
own
them
and
never
said
it
did.
K
This
is
how
we
want
to
do
things
and
and
treat
each
other,
and
part
of
that
is
reaching
out
whether
it's
through
gravitons
or
whatever
and
saying
hey,
look,
hey
sean.
How
can
we
fix
this
and
and
try
to
find
a
solution
beforehand?
I
just
I
just
think
that's
good
conflict
resolution
as
opposed
to
saying
well
it's
either
we
fix
it
nicely
or
we
go
to
war
like
I
don't
think
it
has
to
be
be
thought
it
doesn't.
K
K
K
G
K
G
G
I
D
K
Yeah
and
even
if
it's
just
a
sense
or
two,
it's
some
it's
something
to
point
to
and
say,
hey
look.
This
is
how
we
want
to
address
stuff
like
this.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
saw,
I
don't,
have
you
ever
seen
the
disaster.
Meme
girl,
you
know
the
little
girl
that's
standing
in
front
of
the
fire,
with
the
big
smile
on
her
face,
she's
trying
to
create
an
nft
of
that
meme
so
that
she
can
basically
get
paid
for
something
she
never.
You
know
her
dad
took
that
photo
and
it
just
entered.
K
A
A
I
I
I
remember
there
is
this
thing
that
is
like
hermeneutics
and
it's
like
the
way.
We
all
interpret
things
differently
and,
like
that
happens,
a
lot
with
with
art
and
with
writings
that
sometimes,
when
you
write
something
and
you
leave
it
like
to
to
the
public
the
interpretation
that
the
other
people
do
is
isn't
like.
K
I
always
love
those
articles
like
where
are
the
memes
now
like
where
those
people
are,
and
I
love
reading
them,
because
some
of
these
pictures
are
so
old
now
you
know
they're
10,
15
years
old.
You
know
these
people
are
adults.
Now,
all
these
you
know
the
funny
high
school
yearbook
photo
or
whatever,
but
yeah.
A
K
Put,
I
think,
you're
right
santi
that
that
obviously
there's
there's
some
issue
about
creation
with
a
doubt
and
people's
ability
and
to
control
that
stuff
and
I'll
I'll
put
something
somewhere.
It
makes
sense,
probably
in
this
document
to
say,
hey
your
contributions
on
third
party
websites
are.
Are
there
you
may
have
the
ability
to
to
delete
it
and
you're
welcome
to
and
that
you
know
the
community
would
basically
always
try
to
work
stuff
out
with
with
the
community
members
something
to
that
effect.
E
Cool-
and
I
would
just
encourage
everyone
if
they
want
the
hatch
config
dashboard,
just
got
released
with
its
final
version.
Hopefully
assuming
it
passes
user
acceptance,
testing,
which
I
think
it
will.
I
think
it's
much
easier
to
use
now.
So,
if
you
want
to
propose
parameters
today,
give
it
a
shot
and
we
have
parameters
a
hatch
param
party
at
3
p.m,
west
coast
time,
so
pretty
late
for
europe
midnight
for
europe.
But
if
you're
not
in
europe,
you
should
come
it'll,
be
fun.