►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Plans for the weekend
3:04 - TEC Meeting Protocols and Disclaimers
12:52 - Terms of the proposals
50:50 - Terms of Hatch
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
So
after
you
start
yeah
for
me,
I
was
playing
with
my
online
video
game
friends
and
we
are
going
to
play
some
way
this
night.
So
that's
going
to
be
fun,
and
then
we
are
yeah
we're
going
like
this.
We
have
a
very
beautiful
places
to
work
and
yeah.
We
usually
use
the
weekends
work
with
them
and
that's
that's
awesome
and
yeah
the
rest
of
it
I'll
pass.
A
C
C
D
D
D
E
A
Okay,
all
right
great
great
plans,
perfect.
Okay,
I
was
just
I
was
just
introducing.
As
I
mentioned
I,
I
got
an
email
with
francon
with
his
suggestions
as
after
we
had
the
last
review
last
week
on
the
terms
on
the
hatch
terms,
and
I
introduced
them,
there
he's
taken
a
look.
It
seems
that
everything
is
reflected
there.
A
A
A
So
this
is
the
document:
do
you
wanna
you
just
wanna
go
over
it
to
the
iv,
so
we
can.
We
can
just
review
it
together
and
and
introduce
the
the
corrections
or
the
points
of
view
that
ricardo,
I
think
ricardo
was
over
going
over
it.
Also
yeah.
There's
excuse
me
adrian
all
the
all
the
changes
that
he
made
and
and
and
maybe
I
don't
know
if
sean
when
went
over
this
document-
so
do
you
want
to
just
should
we
just
go
over
it
real.
A
E
Yeah
sure
I'll,
I
can
start
all
right
so
for
the
title.
So
I
suggested
that
because
the
the
original
was
just
these,
the
tc
meeting
attendance
terms,
but
I
thought
it's
it
should
all
be
because
we
were
also
talking
about
the
protocols
and
terms
and
the
disclaimers
so
hsa
suggested
to
you
change
the
title
to
that
and
I
think
adrian
applied
the
changes
and
then.
F
A
D
A
F
D
F
Yes,
sir,
no
problem
the
situation
here
is
that
acai
put
on
the
document.
When
we
talk
about
decentralized
communities,
there's
not
too
many
legislation
around
the
world
we
can
use.
This
is
something
so
new
at
some
point,
so
the
most
important
thing
here
is
to
be
sure
that
the
community
is
acting
with
good
faith.
F
D
F
Oh,
those
are
the
main
changes
we
have
made
at
this
point.
I
believe
we
were
moving
on
in
a
good
way.
Maybe
we
should
add
the
notification
bullet
or
point.
I
don't
know
where
it's
going
to
be,
but
this
is
the
most
important
thing
and
I
want
to
insist
in
this
we're
talking
about
the
community
that
is
made
of
hundreds
of
thousands
or
maybe
will
be
millions
of
people,
so
we're
all
working
here
together
for
a
goal
common
goal.
F
A
Okay,
all
right,
okay,
so
we
just
keep
going
down,
and
the
final
question
down
here
is
this:
is
this
something
you
added
ivy
is
there?
If
is
there
an
aromatic
way
of
notifying?
This
was
a
question
on
the
document
right
that
so
that's
what's?
That
was
just
the
way
to
ask
if
the
recording
that
you
guys
are
posting
there
is
enough,
and-
and
I
guess
this-
this
is
what
adrian
said-
and
we
are
fine
with
that.
So
we
can.
We
can
delete
that.
A
So
I
think
that
the
document
is
is
already
covering
what
we,
what
we
understand
it
got
it.
It
needs
to
be
covering.
So
from
the
legal
point
of
view,
it's
it's
already
reviewed
and
and
and
fine
okay,
so
you
guys
can
just
implement
it
or
whatever,
whatever
you
need
to
add
it
on
the
discord
and
maybe
keep
it
on
the
on
the
code
of
conduct
also
or
whatever.
This
document
needs
to
be
linked.
A
D
Just
a
a
little
higher,
we
changed
the
will
to
should.
Can
we
change
or
change
this
to
will?
Can
we
make
it
back
to
should
just
because,
like
sometimes
you
know,
we're
posting
this
stuff,
and
maybe
someone
takes
the
recording
and
uses
it
without
our
wishes
and
and
who
is
our
you
know
anyway,
I
guess
I
just
want
to
avoid
prop
making
promises.
We
can't
necessarily.
D
D
F
A
Okay-
okay,
all
right
so
ivy
you,
you
can
change
that!
Okay
bring
back
shoot
over
there
on
that
bullet.
I
cannot
for
whatever
reason
I
cannot
edit
it
okay,
perfect!
Then
we
can
just
what
was
that
adrian?
Oh
okay,
you
can
do
it.
Okay,
I'm
gonna
change
it!
That's
it!
Okay,
perfect,
all
right!
So
we,
if
we
leave
this
document,
already
finished,
if
there
is
any
additional
need
in
the
future,
we'll
just
go
over
it.
A
It's
okay,
the
once
the
dao
is
launched.
Third
parties
are
going
to
be
sending
proposals
to
requests
for
funding.
Okay,
we
will
review
them
as
a
dow,
we'll
vote
them
and
if
they
pass
they
will
they
will
the
process
the
you
know.
The
funding
process
will
be
launched
where
they
somehow
will
be
audited
or
we
have
to
check
out
the
reviewing
process,
but
basically
they
will.
They
will
be
given
a
grant
to
support
or
to
fund
the
project
that
they've
submitted.
Okay,
so
there's
there's.
A
I
don't
know
if
there's
two
documents
there,
one
one
one
might
be
the
terms
for
submitting
a
proposal
and
another
which
I
don't
think
is
gonna,
be
too
tough
in
terms
of
legal,
but
then
there's
the
document
that
covers
us
giving
them
funds
to
to
fund
their
project.
Okay,
so
that's
that's
the
document
we
should
be
working
on
and
I
love.
F
D
You
know
I
haven't
seen
anything
from
get
coin.
I
was
I'm
curious
about
what
the
lao
does
the
loud
I
mean
it's
a
bunch
of
lawyers
so
like
I
bet
that
they
they
they
with
their
doubt
that
they
have
some
sort
of
terms
and
then
there's
this
other
casper
dev
dev
foundation
or
something
they're
a
bunch
of
lawyers
too,
and
they
they
are
like,
have
a
dev
grant
program.
D
D
D
And
then,
and
then
we'll
need
we'll
need
those
also
for
later
on,
because
there
will
be
other
governance
proposals
that
will
change
the
parameters
of
the
dow
and
that's
basically,
what
we
need
to
talk
about
is
like
the
parameter
for
the
technically
the
you
know.
We
have
the
god
mode
dow,
and
then
we
have
the
like
micromanagement
of
funding
dell
and
it's
not
even
micro.
It's
still
pretty
macro
management
of
funding,
but
technically
this
dow
can
also
spend
money.
D
A
Okay,
you
guys
get
the
picture,
you
you
you
guys,
especially
sean
and
adrian.
You
get
the
picture
of
of
the
different
terms
that
we're
talking
here
with
griff
yeah,
because
once
once
we
have
the
hatch
of
the
dial
running
the
the
main,
what
what
he
calls
the
main
now,
okay,
it's
gonna
give
funds
to
minor
dollars
that
will
be
inside
the
organization
to
deal
with
funds.
Okay,
like
internal
transfers,
okay
and
then
it
will
also
be
giving
funds.
A
It
will
also
be
giving
funds
to
external
proposals
that
the
external
parties
will
submit
to
require
requests
for
grants.
Okay,
so
that's
basically
the
structure
of
what
we
will
be
having,
and
on
top
of
that
there
is
the
dow,
the
hatch
dial
that
once
is
created.
If
we
get.
If
we
reach
the
minimum
cup,
we
will
have
to
vote
to
create
the
final.
D
C
I
think
that
situation,
the
hatchdown,
giving
rise
to
the
actual
tao
we're
going
to
be
in
uncharted
waters
there,
because
other
than
a
couple
of
other
attempts
at
dao's
there.
There
aren't
a
thousand
companies
doing
this,
and
certainly
not
a
ton
of
them
where
it's
gonna
be
public.
So
that's
gonna
be
the
most
interesting
document.
C
It's
going
to
look
similar
right
because
a
go
found
me
is
essentially
saying:
look
we'll
collect
the
money
and
then
upon
a
proposal
passing
our
internal
review,
we'll
hand
out
the
money
so
that
that
I
think
should
be
gettable
as
well,
at
least
in
terms
of
that,
and
then
I
get
it
that
there
is
sort
of
the
that
weird
moment
in
between
creation
of
the
doubt
where,
like
it,
could
conceivably
go
in
a
different
direction,
so
we
may
need.
We
may
need
some
terms
there,
but
again.
A
D
D
No,
it's
cool,
it's
adrian
and
sean.
You
know
it's
this,
this
idea
or
this
theory
that
you
know
we
want
to
be
sufficiently
decentralized
and
make
sure
we.
We
have
intentions
that
the
dow
will
then
upgrade
into
a
bonding
curve
and
conviction
voting
commons,
you
know,
but
at
the
same
time
the
dow
needs
to
be
autonomous
and
have
its
own
decision-making
power
to
go
whatever
direction
it
wants.
I
I
would
think
that
we
would
want
the
terms
to
reflect
that.
C
C
D
Yeah,
I
think
it's
it's
relatively
well
explained
in
the
hatch
terms,
or
at
least
I
think
it's
called
out
in
the
house
terms,
and
then
now
the
next
terms
are
hey.
You
can
propose
something
so
who
wants
to
propose
something?
Anything
here
are
the
options
you
can
change.
Parameters
of
the
dow.
You
can
transfer
the
funds
of
the
dow,
which
is
effectively
what
the
upgrade
does
the
upgrade
on
the
on
the
technical
side.
It
literally
just
takes
all
the
money,
that's
in
the
down
and
sends
it
to
a
new
down.
D
So
so
we
are
spending
we're
sending
all
of
the
money
out
and
but
we
need
to
warn
people,
the
risks
hey
and-
and
we
also
we
can
warn
people
the
risks
in
the
hatch
terms.
But
then
what
do
we
tell
the
people
who
are
proposing
these
votes
like?
Are
they
liable
if
they,
if
they
propose
something
and
and
the
funds
go
to
like
get
locked
and
everyone
loses
their
money
like?
C
C
Some
of
this
stuff
is
unique,
obviously
right
to
just
the
crypto
stuff,
but
lots
of
you
know,
there's
got
to
be
something
again.
A
gofundme
example
just
strikes
me
so
similar
because
there
has
to
be
stuff
in
it,
because
all
these
mistakes
that
can
happen
with
transferring
money
and
what
happened.
There's
got
to
be
something
similar
in
those
documents
that
at
least
gives
us
some
idea
how
to
phrase
things.
And
yes,
it's
got
to
be
it's,
you
know
got
to
be
tweaked,
but
I
that's
the
first
place.
C
I'm
going
to
look
and
see
what
kind
of
exists
there:
the
governance
agreement,
the
the
that
sort
of
god
level
kind
of
situation-
that's
a
little
different,
but
I
I
do
I
do
think
I
do
think
in
terms
of
like
look.
Proposals
can
do
anything
you're
entering
an
ecosystem
and
an
economy
where
literally
people
can.
We
could
destroy
this
thing
by
vote
and
it
may
happen
today
or
tomorrow
or
a
thousand
years
from
now,
but
at
any
point
in
time
any
proposal
could
in
fact
get
thrown
out
there
and
passed
so.
A
A
Money
is
sent
to
the
final
dial,
the
risk
you
know,
since
there
is
no
funds
or
very
small
amount
of
funds.
If,
if
any
the
risk
is
you
know,
it's
just
changing
the
parameters
that
can
you
know
make
can
harm
if,
if
you
change
the
parameters
in
a
way
that
can
that
can
be
harmful
for
the
final
dial,
that
could
be
the
only
the
only
thing
that
you
would
like
to
avoid,
but
and
our
audience.
D
C
D
C
C
C
You
know
it's
it's
dedicated
to
to
anime
today,
but
it
may
be
shipped
back
to
like
90s
american
cartoons
tomorrow.
If
we
decide
that's
what
we
like
now.
So
that's
it's
just
always
hanging
over
and
that's
unique,
but
I
think
I
think
that
those
initial
parameters
grip,
I
think,
that's
doable.
That
should
be
doable.
D
And
what
is
the
right?
What
are
the
obligations
of
the
proposal?
You
know
they
have
to
pay
this
fee,
but
do
we
want
to
protect
them
from
liability
if
they
make
a
mistake,
or
do
we
want
you're
on
your
own
yeah
or
do
we
want
to
say?
Listen
if
you
make
a
bad
proposal,
the
tec
might
come
after
you.
You
know
if
you're
trying
to
get
your
ass
yeah
we're
gonna
we're
gonna,
find
you
and
you're
gonna
pay.
You
know
like.
C
C
I
I
think
we
can.
I
think
I
think
we
can
and
whether
or
not
we
want
a
proposal
to
be
protected
by
us
or
you're
on
your
own,
that's
more
theoretical,
and
we
probably
all
need
to
think
about
what
we
want
in
that
term.
But
we
can
draft
something
I
mean
between
all
of
us.
We
should
be
able
to
draft
something
that
goes
one
way
or
the
other
on
that
and
then
decide
whether
or
not
that's
right.
G
A
One
one
clarification
here:
grief,
the
oh
and,
let's
keep
in
mind,
all
members
of
the
hatchdaw
will
be
people
whose
member
of
the
swiss
association-
and
we
will
know
them,
will
know
who
they
are.
So
the
audience
is
we.
We
don't
expect
anyone
that
we
don't
know
we
we
anything
can
happen,
but
we
know
absolutely
everyone
in
that
group.
Okay,
it's
not
that
someone
jumped
in
and
we
don't
know
who
they
are
now
one
of
one
of
the
questions
I
wanted
to
grieve
once
the
bonding
curve
is
running.
A
A
D
D
I
mean
there'll,
be
like
just
a
few
people
who
are
making
proposals,
and
I
I'm
I
would
I
don't.
I
just
worry
about
them
like
what
if
sam
has
a
bug
in
his
code
and
no
one
catches
it
right,
like
he
he's
kind-hearted
he's
not
trying
to
scam
anybody
like,
but
he
had
a.
He
had
a
catastrophic
bug
and
the
funds
you
know
a
one
is
a
two:
instead
and
the
funds
get
sent
to
some
horrible
place,
but
they
can't
be
accessed
what
happens
he
made
the
proposal?
D
D
Yeah,
it's
just
there's,
you
know
the
funds
may
be
lost
so
that
that's
the
audience
of
the
people
who
are
putting
money
in,
but
now
we
have
this
new
audience
the
person
who
is
actually
proposing
the
person
who
took
the
agency
to
say
this
is
the
next
step
and
do
we
need
to
have
some
sort
of
expectation
setting
with
that
human
or
those
human
who
would
propose
to
to
the
doubt
or
not
because
they're
already
hatchers?
I
don't
know.
C
C
I
don't
think
it's
necessarily
complicated
because
I
think
you're
right
griff,
that
and-
and
I
think
santi
brought
this
point
up
too-
of
at
least
with
the
the
hatch
agreement
we
will
know
who
is
there
we'll
know
who
the
people
are?
Yes,
people
sometimes
hide
their
true
intentions,
regardless
of
what
they
say
and
therefore,
probably
an
agreement
is
a
good
idea
just
to
make
sure
you
know,
we've
expressed
what
we
thought
was
going
to
happen,
but
I
don't
know
if
it
has
to
be.
You
know
a
30
disclaimer-filled
document
that
we
create
from
scratch.
C
It's
almost.
I
think
I
think
of
that
document
as
more
of
a
look
here
are
the
risks?
Here's
what
we
think
is
going
to
happen,
and-
and
let's
create
this,
this
dow
that's
going
to
function
and
then
the
hashtag
kind
of
disappears
right,
I
mean
it.
It
eventually
votes
itself
into
non-existence
once
you
hit
the
minimum
cap
and
you
transfer
over
to
the
real
dow
that
hatched
out
kind
of
is
gone
right.
So
I
mean
this
this
first
god
level
document
is
just
getting
us
to
that
point.
D
Yeah,
so
so,
technically,
and
and
something
that's
been
because
of
this
opportunity
to
start
using
celeste,
we
will
have
at
least
on
a
technical
level,
a
different
dow
that
will
in
a
different
voting
mechanism.
It
will
be
very
similar
to
danny
lion
voting,
but
it
will
be
different.
There
won't
be
the
rage
quit
anymore.
I
mean
we
have
a
bonding
curve.
You
want
a
rage,
quit
just
sell
your
tokens
on
the
bondi
crew
right
so
and
there
will
be
this
disputable
mechanism.
D
So
I
don't
know
where,
like
if
you
pro
for
the
first
dow
there's
no
disputing.
If
you
propose
something
it's
it's
up,
there,
people
can
vote
on
it
and
there's
like
all
these
like
vote
buffer
times
and
all
this
stupid,
but
then
for
the
second
dow.
If
you
propose
something,
there
will
need
to
be
a
very
clear
covenant
that
we
need
to
spend
time
on
right.
C
D
So
the
the
first
dow
has
this
thing
called
dandelion
voting
and
anytime.
You
propose
a
vote
there.
There's
these
certain
rules
like
there's
when
the
vote
passes,
there's
a
delayed
execution
time.
During
that
time,
people
can
rage
quit
these
sorts
of
weird
things
with
that
voting
and
then,
when
we
upgrade
to
the
new
dow,
it's
very
likely
to
use
disputable
voting.
What
disputable
voting
does.
D
If
the
person
who
proposed
it
puts
honey
up,
then
two
people
have
honey
and
the
court
will
decide
who
gets
their
honey
back
and
and
whose
honey
goes
to
the
court
to
pay
them
to
make
the
decision.
It's
a
it's
a
weird
system,
but
it's
because
of
that
I
would
say
it
probably.
I
thought
it
would
be
reusable,
but
now
I'm
thinking
about
it
and
it
probably
won't
be
very
reasonable.
I
mean
we'll
be
able
to
take
some
of
the
context
out
like
with
dandelion
voting.
You
will
be
able
to
change.
D
The
parameters
of
you
know
like
like.
Let's
say
that
we
have
a
quorum,
that's
really
high!
Well,
okay,
guys,
let's
all
rally
together
to
lower
the
quorum,
come
on.
You
know
and
then
we'll
change
the
quorum
percentage
down
and
then
and
then
we
can
have
another
vote
or
something
right
or
change
support
required,
or
we
can
change
some
of
these
parameters.
C
That
is
obviously
not
going
to
be
covered
in
any
gofundme
document
we
ever
find.
No,
that
is
more
of
a
as
we're
writing.
It
we'll
have
to
understand
the
code
really
well
to
be
able
to
explain
hey.
This
is
how
proposals
are
going
to
happen.
I
think
we
can
do
it.
It's
just
it's
just
going
to
take
a
few
iterations.
D
D
Oh,
my
god,
we
have
insane.
You
know,
like
every
mechanism
is
explained
to
the
max,
like
we
spent
way
too
much
time
on
this,
I'm
a
little
disappointed.
I
always
spend
so
much
time
it's,
but
it's
so
beautiful.
So
I
think
we
can
link
to
it.
We
can
link
to
the
implementation
spec.
We
can
link
to
these
these
pieces
and
we
can
say
yes,
this
is
how
it
works,
and
you
better
understand
that.
But
I
think
that's
more
for
the
the
hatch
document
and
it's
not
for
the
person
who's
proposing.
C
A
Let's
try:
let's
try
to
move
little
by
little,
because
otherwise
it's
going
to
be
too
hard.
I
think
let's
focus
first
on
the
terms
for
the
proposal
to
become
a
final
doubt:
okay
to
to
cover
the
proper
name:
okay,
the
user-
that
sends
the
proposal.
Let's
think
on
that
document,
first,
and
let's
keep
moving
as
we
as
we
keep
closing
documents
a
little
by
little.
F
That
was
gonna,
be
my
question.
Actually
I
mean
this
is
my
second
time
here.
So
I'm
trying
to
trying
to
understand
everything,
but
do
we
need
three,
five,
eight
ten
different
documents,
it's
not
better.
To
only
have
I
mean
just
one
final
document
in
which
we
have
like
all
these
terms
and
conditions
and
rules
whatever
or
is
it
better
to
have
I
mean
certain
type
of
documents.
C
I
think
it's
always
easy
to
start
with
the
idea
of
create
a
document
and
then
say:
hey
this
thing
may
not
be
necessary.
We
may
we
may
look
at
the
proposal
and
I'm
just
calling
it
the
proposal
document.
For
now
we
may
look
at
the
proposal
document
and
say
look.
Why
did
we
write
three
pages
about
this
completely
unnecessary
and
it's
just
reiterating
stuff,
we
all
intuitively
kind
of
agree
to
already
and
and
know
and
then
say,
scrap
it
the
and
santia.
I
think
you're
right.
We
should
not
think
about
the
proposal
terms.
Yet.
D
D
C
Can
be
looking
at
other
stuff,
but
I
mean
if
we're
even
if
the
focus
is
on
this
proposal,
document
yeah
you're
right,
we
may
decide,
we
don't
need
it,
but
I
think
it's
easier.
If
we
start
with
writing
it
and
then
decide
we
don't
need
it
then
to
just
start
with.
We
don't
need
it
and
then
at
some
point
down
the
road
go.
Oh,
we
might
need
to
write
this.
C
C
It
works
where
how's
it
going
to
go.
Who
say
we
hit
the
the
funding
and
everyone's
excited
and,
and,
and
you
know
it
looks
like
we're
going
to
implement
this
who's
going
to
be
the
actual
person
that
says,
hey
here's
my
proposal
to
create
the
dow
like
how's
that
who's
imagine.
How
is
that
going
to
happen.
D
That
would
be
so
we're
going
to
have
this
other
vote.
That
will
happen
on
github,
actually,
where
everyone
can
propose
the
parameters
that
we
upgrade
to
and
there's
this
cool
dashboard
where
people
will
be
able
to
like
pick
select
parameters
and
then,
and
then
people
with
tc
tokens,
and
this
is
but
see.
This
is
all
signaling.
There's
nothing
like
guaranteed
out
of
this
process
that
I'm
explaining
now,
but
people
with
tec
tokens.
D
The
tch
tokens
will
be
able
to
vote
on
their
favorite
sets
of
parameters
in
a
kind
of
more
like
a
curation
way.
Where
there's
a
list
of
you
know,
20
sets
of
parameters
and
everyone
votes
on
their
favorite
ones
right
and
then
the
one
that
gets
the
top
choice
sem
and
the
common
storm
dev
team.
We
will
implement
that
dow
and
hopefully
we'll
do
it
right,
we'll
probably
do
a
test
run
of
it.
D
You
know
and
and
make
sure
it's
right
and
then
we'll
create
a
proposal
that
will
migrate
all
of
the
funds
into
that
dow
at
the
expressed
opinion,
all
right,
like
ratios,
where
it's
supposed
to
go,
because
it's
it'll
be
a
complicated
down
there.
Some
funding
will
go
to
the
bonding
curve.
Some
funny
we'll
go
to
this
conviction.
Voting
pool
there'll
be
all
these
tokens
that
need
to
be
minted
right.
Yeah.
D
D
Yeah,
okay,
so
those
are
the
initial
pro
right
right.
So
we
do
we
do
this
signaling
on
github,
so
that
okay,
this
is
what
we
start
with
and
then
and
then
we
launch
the
hashtag,
and
then
we
do
the
same
signaling
for
the
upgrade
right
and
then
but
that's
the
first
signaling
is
with
like
these
others
tokens
the
next
signaling
for
the
upgrade
is
with
the
tokens
that
were
created
in
the
hatch
down
right
and
then
and
then
the
hashtag
has
to
actually
certify
this
vote
right.
D
D
A
D
D
But
actually
I
think
that
it
was
pretty
close.
I
think
more
people
just
barely
believed
in
god
than
not.
It
was
a
pretty
atheist
crew
back
then,
but
but
yeah
I
I
would
just
say
we
have
to
be
prepared
that
that
the
plan
of
us
proposing
you
know
the
only
proposal,
even
with
the
five
hundred
dollar
fee.
You
know
it's
bull
market
people
got
500
to
troll.
You
know
we
we,
I
don't
know
I
just.
I
just
wonder
it
might
be
overkill
to
make
terms
here
right.
D
C
Correct
correct
so
you're,
not
you
not
only
need
someone
to
kind
of
go
against
or
or
be
a
rebel
or.
However,
you
want
to
describe
them,
want
to
be
a
cowboy
or
whatever
metaphor
works
for
you,
but
then
it's
got
to
have
consensus,
which
is
in
a
weird
way.
If
it
does
it's
almost
like
well,
okay,
I
guess
that's
what
you
want
to
do.
I
I
get
it
let's.
I
don't
think
it
has
to
be
a
big
document
griff
because
we're
starting
off
from
scratch.
C
D
It
okay
yeah,
and
I
think
I
think
it
can
probably
I
like
the
idea
of
it
being
a
short
one
thing
we
just
say
hey
if
you're
proposing
you
know,
then
these
are
the
expectations.
These
are
the
risks.
These
are
the
obligations.
These
are
the
benefits
this
is
what's
allowed.
This
is
what's
permitted,
this
is
what's
restricted
or
whatever
I
mean.
I
think
it
might
be
good
to
say,
hey
if
you're
proposing
to
the
dow
and
like
you
know,
and
it's
evil
like
get
the
out
of
here
or
something
I
don't
know.
D
A
G
A
H
H
So
here
is
that
the
paragraph
that
I
wanted
to
add,
like
the
organization,
provides
its
own
procedures
to
manage
conflict
and
they
serve
as
the
first
layer
to
provide
fast,
easy
to
access,
alternative
dispute
resolution
to
the
members
and
the
issues
that
arise
with
within
the
dow.
But
if
any
situation
cannot
be
handled
this
way,
it
can
scale
to
an
arbitration
or
litigation
as.
H
C
Sounds
good
to
me,
I
think
I
think
that's
awesome.
I
I
really
like
this
and
this
kind
of
came
up
last
week
and
I
think
there
was
a
how
do
we
imagine
conflict
getting
resolved,
and
so
I
think
this
is
a
great
kind
of
first
statement
to
kind
of
get
us
there.
Generally
speaking
at
least
we're
where
I
am.
C
If
there
is
ambiguity,
it's
almost
always
going
to
be
used
against
the
people,
drafting
the
agreement
and
then
therefore
in
favor
of
the
people
who
had
to
agree
to
vague
or
unclear
terms,
so
the
the
more
we
kind
of
get
this
clear.
I
think
the
better.
So
I
I
really
I
like
that
sentence
a
lot.
I
like
a
pair
whole.
C
A
Almost
a
document
we
have
it
pretty
much
done
and
we're
gonna
start
focusing
on
the
new
on
the
new
terms
that
are
going
to
be
nice
to
deal
with.
Okay,
we're
just
five
minutes
early.
I
think
we
can
leave
it
here
for
today.
Thank
you
all
for
coming.
Thank
you
adrian
for
showing
up
and
sean
for
your
second
meeting.
I
think
it's
your
second
one
and
just
reach
reach
reach
out
to
me
whenever
you
you
want
to
discuss
and
and
go
over
and
start
working
on
that
document.