►
From YouTube: W2 Legal WG: Github issues to push!
Description
Timecodes
00:00 - Intencions and distractions
06:00 - Round of people's schedule for this week
10:33 - Going over Github issues
53:02 - Closing thoughts
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Yeah,
let
me
start,
let
me
start
today
and
so
for
today's
meeting.
My
intention
is
to
try
to
get
all
the
issues
with
one
champion.
We're
gonna
share
the
issues
on
the
on
the
github,
all
the
legal
issues
that
we
have
opened
at
least
those
that
are
most
critical
and
distractions,
and
now
that
I
have
my
volume
working
and
my
sound
working,
I
don't
I
shouldn't-
have
any
distractions
so
I'll
pass
it
to.
B
Yeah,
my
intention
is
to
share
some
of
the
results
of
the
previous
issues
that
I
was
working
on
in
this
group.
If
they're,
if,
if
there's
space
for
that
and
and
especially
what
maria
from
aragon
was
saying
and
also
help
shepherd,
the
like,
you
know,
make
sure
people
want
to
take
on
issues
that
that
they
feel
like
they
have
the
agency
to
know
what
to
work
on
and
and
maybe
even
support
later
on
the
week
if
they
need
support
on
taking
on
some
issues
and
distractions.
B
C
D
I'm
really
here
just
to
listen.
I
was
here
to
learn
about
all
things
legal,
but
I'm
also
now
here
to
learn
about
how
to
get
how
to
how
you
guys
are
professional,
github
issue,
users
and
distributors
and
delegators
I'll.
Just
watch
you
guys
in
action
thanks,
distractions,
none
currently
and
I'll
pass
to
anya.
F
All
right,
I
don't
have
any
real
intentions,
but
I'd
like
to
start
closing
off
all
this
like
minor
or
or
slight
low
priority
issues,
so
that
we
also
focus
on
on
the
key
ones,
because
my
understanding
is
that
there's
a
fairly
tight
deadline
at
december.
So
we
need
to
start
focusing
on
the
key
issues
that
holding
back
the
schedule
distractions.
I
so
started
a
new
role
in
this
in
a
startup
foundation.
So
this
is
really
what
I'm
doing
is.
Basically,
in
my
spare
time.
B
A
B
B
Lawrence
fantastic,
thank
you
lawrence.
I
think
lawrence
really
hit
it
on
the
head
there
with
like.
We
need
to
figure
out
how
to
prioritize
which
issues
are
most
important
and
then
make
sure
that
those
get
tackled
this
week.
You
know
the
ones
that
are
most
important
for
this
week
and
then
move
forward
with
being
okay
with
some
of
the
issues
not
being
because
not
all
of
them
are
the
highest
priority:
marina,
hi
hi.
A
I
totally
agree
because
I'm
having
many
issues
with
my
with
my
discord
and
I
may
have
to
jump
out,
so
I
would,
I
would
say
just
start
with
with
the
with
the
board
from
github.
So
we
I'd
like
to
go
over
all
the
issues
and
get
everyone
understand
what
they
are
and
try
to
find
an
owner
or
a
champion
for
for
those
that
still
are
lacking.
One.
A
C
I
think
I
can
take
it.
I
I
I
have
time
actually
to
put
time,
but
the
the
thing
is
I
I
don't
know
what
should
I
do
if
that
makes
sense.
So
if
there's
something
like
simple
like
like
someone
like
me,
can
do
it
I'd
be
glad
to
help.
So
when
we
see
the
issues
we
have,
maybe
it's
something
I
can
do,
and
I
have
time
for
like
three
to
five
hours.
I
have
this
week
with
that
and
I'll
pass
it
to
marina.
G
E
A
Great
grief,
are
you:
are
you
sharing
your
screen
with
the
with
the
issues
from
github,
so
we
can
go
over
them
and
as
we
go
over
them,
we
will
review
the
ones
that
already
that
we
have
been
working
on
and
we
can
explain
the
rest
that
still
needs
someone
to
jump
into
them
and
and
see.
If
anyone
wants
to
take
him.
B
B
B
Basically,
santi
came
to
the
call
we
handed
this
over
to
chris
and
chris
is
willing
to
kind
of
take
the
lead
and
so
that
I
I
don't
have
to
lead
it,
but
I
will
be
working
very
closely
with
it.
Basically,
the
common
stack
association
has
a
legal
protection
for
everyone
who
builds
the
software.
It's
written
in
our
in
our
statutes
that,
like
our
goal,
is
to
build
this
software
and
also
nurture
a
community
of
people
who
will
steward
commons
from
the
early
stages
with
the
common
stack
association.
B
B
A
Grief,
can
you
slightly
give
a
little
explanation
of
how
we
are
intending
to
do
that?
We're
learning
to
every
hatchery
become
a
member
of
the
association
through
a
little
purchase
like
one
one
one
day,
one
die
and,
and
once
they
do
the
purchase,
they
are
automatically
automatically
become
members
of
the
association,
and
they
can
they
can
be
under
the
umbrella
of
it.
B
B
What
we
can
do,
though,
and
what
we've
done
with
the
association,
is
basically
make
an
agreement
that,
if
any
member,
when
acting
in
the
aligned
with
the
values
of
the
common
stack
association,
if
any
member
runs
into
legal
issues,
we
will
support
them
up
to
ten
thousand
dollars
of
legal
fees.
It's
not
necessarily
insurance.
B
It's
more
like
more
of
a
like
a
mandate
of
the
association
for
lack
of
a
better
word
that
we
will
support
people
who
have
if
anyone
has
legal
issues
up
to
a
certain
extent,
and
it's
also
part
of
the
social
agreement,
and
so
the
hatcheries
are
still
being
are
hatching
the
organization
as
individuals
they
receive
tokens.
They
might
receive
profits,
that's
all
on
them,
but
at
least
the
common
stack
association
is
can
protect
them,
the
best
of
our
abilities
and
yeah.
B
B
We've
had
three
back
and
forths
with
them
and
we're
on
the
last
one
we
just
needed.
There
were
just
a
couple
changes
that
we
were
trying
to
push
forward,
making
it
so
that
legal
entities
can
be
part
of
the
daf
as
opposed
to
just
humans
and
in
or
like
confirming
that
that's
possible
and
a
few
other
things
are
just
a
couple
other
small
things,
but
for
the
most
part
the
statues
are
written.
B
Our
swiss
lawyer,
raf,
who
works
with
patrick,
not
schwarzenegger,
but
you
guys
know
who
I'm
talking
about
patrick
from
the
ethereum
foundation
and
he's
a
pretty
big
name
in
the
in
the
swiss
legal
crypto
space
and
his
face
is
on
the
common
snag
website.
Those
guys
are,
are
our
legal
advisors
and
they're
willing
to
put
their
face
on
our
website.
That
was
the
big
thing
that
was
the
linchpin.
It's
like
listen,
you
have
to
put
your
face
on
our
website
and
then
we'll
trust.
Your
legal
opinion.
A
A
B
A
B
A
j
is
the
the
token
for
argon
court
they're,
actually
in
a
very
interesting
situation
now,
because
they're
trying
to
remove
a
j
for
a
t.
But
that's
not
the
conversation
basically
and
j,
is
very
interesting
to
us,
because
we're
straight
up
forking
the
ang
code,
we're
using
the
exact
almost
the
exact
same
strategy
that
argon
used
for
anj.
B
So
when
they
with
anj.
You
get
this
token
and
that
token
gives
you
the
ability
to
be
a
juror
in
a
dispute
in
aragon
court
and
they
have
a
like
a
token
economic
system
for
it.
But
the
main
thing
is
that
people
put
in
ant
and
they
get
into
a
bonding
curve
and
they
get
anj
tokens
out
of
them
just
like
how
people
will
put
an
x
die
into
a
bonding
curve
and
get
get
tec
tokens
out
of
them
for
our
use
case.
B
So
they
have
legal
terms
and
I
went
through
them
and
reviewed
them
with
maria.
We
need
to
have
a
follow-up
on
our
conversation,
but
the
document
where
I
was
taking
notes
is
linked
in
the
github
issue,
as
well
as
the
terms
and
conditions,
and
basically
their
strategy
is
like.
Okay,
argon
one
is
is
kind
of
like
the
common
stack
association.
B
Sorry,
the
argon
foundation
is
kind
of
like
the
common
tech
association,
so
they
can
protect
the
people
who
are
initializing
the
system,
but
after
that,
here
are
the
terms
that
people
have
to
agree
to
when
you
buy
and
sell
into
the
bonding
curve,
and
one
of
the
interesting
things
that
they
have
here
is
that
they
do
not
give
a
legal
entity
a
legal
identity.
Their
legal
strategy
is
to
not
give
a
legal
identity
to
the
people
who
are
buying
and
selling
in
the
bonding
curve.
B
They
say
their
strategy,
whether
it's
right
or
wrong,
is
that
if
it's
it's,
it's
actually
harder
to
go
against
these
the
people
who
are
buying
and
selling
into
the
bonding
curve.
If
you
don't
have
a
legal
entity
and
that
it's
not
a
common
enterprise,
it's
just
people
hanging
out
in
you
know,
playing
poker
together,
almost
right
like
they're
they're.
B
Just
people
that
are
yeah
there's
a
financial
game
being
played,
but
they're
not
really
in
a
common
enterprise,
is,
is
their
argument
and
that's
what
it
says
in
that
that
at
least
that's
what
they're
trying
to
do.
But
that
being
said,
they
still
use
the
terms
and
predictions
and
conditions
to
protect
that
non-legal
entity,
so
they
have
even
even
though
the
non-legal
entity,
the
argon
network,
dao,
is
not
is
separate
from
the
argonne
foundation.
B
They
still
have
certain
phrases
in
there
that
say
the
argon
network
dao
is
not
liable
for
any
lost
damage,
blah
blah
blah
the
argon
network.
Dao
is,
you
know
not
liable
for
this
and
that
like
they,
they
try
to
protect
it
anyway.
So
they
also
have
some
really
interesting.
Phrases
like
the
anj
token
cannot
be
used
for
any
other
purpose
other
than
participating
as
in
argon
court
as
a
juror
like
here's,
the
purpose
you
know
and
if
you're
trying
to
make
money.
B
B
It
is
what
it
is
everyone's
participating
at
their
own
risk
and
we're
not
we're
not
going
to
create
a
shell
legal
entity
to
protect
you
we're
just
going
to
like
it's
a
general
partnership.
If
that's
what
people
think
it
is
but
hey,
you
enter
these
terms
and
conditions.
You're
gonna
have
to
fight
that
cause
in
switzerland.
It's
basically
their
strategy.
Like
you
know,
so
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
how
that
will
work.
They
don't
it
didn't
seem
like
maria
was
all
that
confident
about
it,
but
it's
like
okay.
B
Well,
definitely
take
a
lot
of
the
what
they
have.
I
mean
there's
so
much
gold
there
in
in
their
terms
and
conditions
that
I'm
don't
have
questions
about
just
like
lots
of
text.
That
is
obvious
what
we
want
in
there.
You
know
they.
They
had
swiss
lawyers
that
wrote
all
this
and
there's
all
the
classic.
Like
hey,
you're,
participating
in
a
crypto
economic
system
and
there
may
be
losses,
there
may
be
hacks.
There
may
be
blah
blah
blah,
that's
all
written
out
here,
so
we
should
definitely
are.
B
G
F
Can
I
an
observation,
aragon,
court?
Their
system
is
actually
is
based
on
a
concept
called
shilling
points,
and
that's
very
good
for
determining
true
or
false
facts.
What
is
not
so
good
at
is
like
handling
people
interactions,
because
they
had
the
situation
themselves
where
they
gave
up
funds
to
a
grantee
who
did
not
deliver,
and
then
they
did
not
go
through
their
own
process
of
using
the
court
by
actually
going
through
swiss
litigation.
At
least
it
was
about
a
month
ago.
F
B
Yeah,
I
mean
we
definitely
we're
not
looking
at
aragon
court
as
a
system
more
just
like
hey.
They
put
out
a
token
with
a
bonding
curve,
they're
a
swiss
legal
entity
or
connected
to
them
or
even
using
their
code
base.
So
it
seemed
like
a
really
easy
win
to
get
some
research
and
some
data
out
of
it
there.
I
don't
think
I
have
any
other
swiss
bonding
curves.
B
B
G
B
The
litigation
issue
is
I
I
made
this
here.
Aragon
originally
had
a
network
dao
and
they
were
using
ant
token
holders
could
signal.
Basically,
if
they
supported,
you,
know,
funding
things
and
then
the
aragon
association,
swiss
association,
would
execute
on
those
on
those
proposals.
They
also
filtered
the
proposals
before
they
would
go
to
the
vote
of
the
people
right,
and
so
a
group
called
autark
who
I'm
very
good
friends
with
they
made
a
proposal
to
receive.
B
It
was
somewhere
around
1.6
million
dollars
to
work
as
a
dev
team
for
two
years.
It
was
their
second
proposal
after
the
first
one
was,
you
know
they
felt
a
success
and
then
they
argon
basically
well.
I
kind
of
write
it
out
here,
argon
sort
of
was
like
yeah.
You
know
this
whole
network
dial
thing
isn't
really
great.
Also,
the
flock
program
of
decentralized
are
decentralizing.
Our
dev
team
isn't
really
working
as
well
as
we'd
like
so
we're
gonna.
B
Try
it
we're,
so
they
reviewed
all
the
agreements
they
had
with
dev
teams
and
the
argonne
association
did.
And
what
do
you
know?
They
still
felt
the
argon
one
was
a
great
dev
team
and
they
also
thought
that
one
hive
is
is
a
decent
dev
team,
although
they
had
no
formal
agreements
with
them
really
and
one
hive.
Luke
worked
for
aragon
at
the
time,
so
aragon
won.
So
then,
basically,
anyone
who
didn't
work
for
aragon,
one
kind
of
got,
kicked
out
just
to
say
it.
B
And
so
then
you
know
argon
was
like
well
we're
not
paying
you
until
you
agree
to
the
agreed
to
an
offer,
and-
and
so
then
they
had
no
choice
really
but
to
go
to
court
about
it
and
including
the
court
of
public
opinion.
This
this
hit
twitter
and
then
yeah,
and
then
they
settled
out
of
court
with
an
nda.
B
B
E
I
don't
actually
believe
that
just
the
terms
and
conditions
are
actually
not
from
this
might
be
open
for
a
longer
time,
because
it
might
serve
as
a
really
really
good
learning.
Experience
as
well
is
to
review
the
contract
that
they
had
in
place
and
to
find
out
how
both
parties
might
actually
protect
themselves
better,
how
these
disputes
might
be
better
managed,
and
I'm
not
sure
if
you're
gonna
get
enough
information
from
maria
as
well,
but
learning
from
them.
E
B
E
Then
I
mean,
whenever
you
create
an
agreement,
parties
always
have
the
freedom
to
you
know,
withdraw
from
the
agreement
and
usually
for
that
reason
you
usually
have
the
clause
that
says
well.
If
you
are
withdrawing
from
the
agreement,
this
is
going
to
be.
You
know
the
payment
that
you
have
to
make,
as
the
the
circumstances
are
so
severe
that
you
kind
of
had
to
withdraw
from
the
agreement
that
that
was
like
luis
majora
or
something
like
that.
E
But
otherwise
I
mean
this
clause
is
basically
there
to
provide
you
with
a
certainty
of
how
much
you're
gonna
lose
or
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
you
if
you
actually
actually
breach
the
agreement,
and
that
might
be
one
class
that
we
also
put
in
our
agreements
or
our
contracts,
but
otherwise
again,
contracts
are
always
being
breached
or
there's
always
some
sort
of
you
know
things
that
are
happening
around
them.
So
that's
one
thing
that
this
might
not
really
be
so
much
of
a
legal
dispute.
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
that's
a
really
good
point
and
I'll
I'll
try
to
bring
that
up
with
maria
today
about
the
communications
around
it
and
yeah,
and-
and
we
should
definitely
have
it
there,
depending
on
the
strategy
that
we
take
with
the
ta
commons.
It
may
not
be
so
applicable
because
the
the
agreement
was
between
the
argon
association
and
autark
and
depending
on.
B
If
we
have
a
legal
entity
for
the
te
commons
dao
or
not,
if
we
have
a
legal
entity
for
the
t
commons
dao,
then
then
then
it
would
be
very
applicable.
If
we
end
up
saying:
oh,
it's
just
a
dao,
a
general
partnership
player
would
play
at
your
own
risk.
Then
then
we
would
probably
go
more
towards
cody's
law.
The
money
is
moving
and
there's
there's
another
issue.
That's
relevant
or
there's
another
thing
that
happened.
That's
relevant
to
this
and
that's
with
one
hive.
Santi
is
very
familiar
with
that.
B
You
know
worth
this
much,
you
know
apply
for
it
and
then
they
decided
not
to
vote
for
that
bug,
bounty
to
be
filled
later,
and
so
then
there
became
a
dispute
over
that
and
that's
the
kind
of
stuff.
We
also
have
to
be
careful
about
about
not
promising
anything
and
saying
that
you
know
the
dao
is
the
final
decider
of
whether
or
not
these
things
and
all
agreements
that
happened
beforehand
probably
are
are
moots
because
the
execution
is
in
the
conviction.
A
No,
that's
what
happened.
I
guess
the
guy
thought
that
he
was
going
to
be
getting
paid
this
much
amount
and
later
on.
They
thought
they
they
were
being
cheated,
they
paid
part
of
that
and
and
they
they
refused
to
pay
the
rest,
and
the
guy
ended
up
putting
a
proposal
to
get
paid,
but
it
never
never
went
through
and
that's
how
things
finally
ended.
I
think
he
was
more
a
cheater
than
a
really
than
a
guy
really
finding
a
back
on
the
on
the
on
the
code.
A
B
Okay,
so
that's
that's
story
time.
Let's,
let's
keep
going
on
some
of
these
issues,
figure
out
the
blockers
for
what
is
stopping
the
common
stack
from
being
ready.
I
think
I
can
just
assign
that
to
chris
who's,
not
here
but
chris,
and
I
will
take
this
one
on
investigating
eu
new
regulation.
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
priority
for
our
next
two
months.
B
G
B
E
B
B
B
B
A
Yeah
actually
ruben
sent.
He
said
he
couldn't
make
it
for
the
call
today,
but
he
sent
a
document
that
I
linked
in
the
in
the
issue.
He
was
actually
doing
some
research
and
apparently
prime
dial
is
under
the
hood
of
of
a
curacao
association
which
follows
the
curacao
law,
which
is
not
the
same
law
that
the
netherlands
law.
A
Although
it's
a
it's
an
it's
a
netherland
territory
and
it
it
happens
to
be
quite
an
interesting
type
of
of
of
legal
entity
and
he
sent
it
in
in
the
document
which
which
which
right
there
there
is
a
link
to
the
the
organ,
the
foundation
in
curacao
and
the
different.
The
different
legal
aspects
that
that
kind
of
association
can
deal
with,
especially
icos.
C
B
A
E
E
I'm
also
going
to
have
a
call
with
luke
river,
probably
next
week,
so
I
can
get
more
information
about
what
legal
entities
they're
using
so
far.
I
know
that
they
were
talking
about
stitching
company,
which
is
like
a
co-op
or
living
netherlands,
very
interesting
form
as
well.
More
information
about
that.
B
B
B
B
That's
nice,
okay,
so
adding
to
the
scenarios
these
things.
Okay!
Well,
maybe
do
would
you
guys
be
interested
in
having
a
hack
session
where
we
really
just
dive
into
making
at
least
10
of
these
issues
and
kind
of
give
each
one
like
three
minutes
to
talk
about
and
then
move
on
and
move
on
and
move
on,
and
maybe
we
can
just
pile
this
out
in,
like
a
one
hour,
call
sounds
good
yeah,
cool.
C
C
C
C
B
C
B
Yeah,
that
seems
like
a
soft
gov
that
is
probably
more
of
a
soft
gas
solution
there,
where
we
somehow
like
have
the
ability
to
flag,
repeat
proposals
or
proposals
that
are
not
meeting
our
like
quality
of
some
sort,
but
I
think
that's
a
really
good
issue
to
even
we
can
even
write
down.
I
mean
it's
something
that
we
should
write
down
in
this.
If
you
want
to,
I
would,
I
would
definitely
say
that's
something.
That's
worth
a
scenario.
That's
already
happened
that
we
should
probably
put
in
here
awesome.
B
B
I
I
can
try
to
put
together
a
doodle
for
a
call
on
on
this
next
week,
because
this
is
a
really
high
priority
issue.
It
would
be
nice
to
just
have
this.
Have
these
things
called
out
and
then
put
this
down
and
I'm
happy
to
make
a
doodle
to
make
sure
that
we
can
find
a
time
that
works
for
the
most
possible
people.
B
B
B
B
C
H
B
H
I
B
B
B
B
Okay,
well,
we
only
have
three
minutes
left,
so
I
think
we
can
just
leave
it
for
closing
thoughts.
If
that's
okay
with
everyone
is
there
any
last?
Well,
actually,
that's
what
closing
thoughts
are
for
anyway.
So
thank
you
guys
for
letting
me
rant
about
what's
going
on
in
this
space,
I'm
really
sorry
for
taking
over
the
meeting
santi,
but
it
was
fun
for
me
at
least.
I
hope
it
was
fun
for
you
guys
and
I'll
pass
it
to
santi.
A
No,
I
thank
you
if
I'm
I'm
having
issues
with
the
technology
today,
as
you
guys
can
see
so
hopefully
at
least
voice
was
was
working.
Fine
and,
let's
see
what
we
get
next
week,
it'd
be
great
to
have
that
doodle.
So
we
can
find
the
best
time
to
meet
on
on
discussing
all
those
case,
cases
that
we
can
think
of
and
from
there
see
what
what's
the
progress
for
for
next
week,
I'll
pass
it
to
septimus.
C
E
Everybody
likes
that
name
yeah,
it's
on
you
by
the
way,
but
anyhow
it
was
a
great
call,
very
informative,
but
I
think
we're
all
all
getting
ortiz
myself,
I'm
getting
used
to
the
github.
I've
never
seen
that
phone
before
and
I
kind
of
love
it,
especially
because
it's
really
resourceful
and
what
we
just
discovered
is
kind
of
awesome.
So
I
look
forward
to
have
more
people
adding
stuff
on
our
issues
that
looks
dope
already.
B
Yeah
not
so
so
I'll
repeat
what
he
said,
dr
lau.
Next
time.
I
try
to
get
a
louder
mic,
but
or
get
that
your
face
next
to
the
mic,
but
he
said
that
he's
curious.
If
there's
any
deadlines-
and
I'll
be
honest,
so
legal
deadline
is
like
basically
not
to
slow
anything
down.
We
have
specific
deliverables
which
are
not
completely
outlined
yet,
but
I
was
but
their
terms
and
conditions
for
basically
every
interaction
with
the
dow
being
written
now
before
the
launch.
B
The
launch
is
likely
to
be,
I
mean
we're
really
still
shooting
for
december,
but
it's,
it's
probably
unlikely.
We'll
have
better
understanding
when
we
get
the
full
road
map
put
together,
but
it's
looking
like
it's
gonna,
be
mid-january,
just
the
holidays.
You
know
slow
things
down,
so
we
could
have
if
holidays
didn't
exist.
B
I
bet
the
end
of
december
would
be
great,
but
the
reality
is
it's
probably
gonna
be
mid-january,
and
so
we
need
to
have
terms
and
conditions
for
people
everywhere
that
they
need
to
be
and
have
a
full
understanding
of.
You
know
what
we're
protecting
and
what
we're
not
and
be
able
to
inform
the
hatcheries
before
launch.
So
we
will
do
a
better
job
at
making
sure
that
those
deliverables
are
very
clear
and
and
explicit
and
the
deadlines.
B
A
A
Marina,
if
she
can
get
that
document
from
the
research
group
at
utrecht
university,
so
we
at
least
can
take
a
look
at
it
before
next
friday
meeting
with
them
and
grief.
Will
you
be
able
to
answer
these
guys
and
tell
them
that's
fine
and
we
can
meet
here
on
on
our
discord
channel.
That's
perfect!
Thank
you.