►
From YouTube: W25 Legal WG: Discord agreements and Params discussion
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
The
starting
question
now
that
it's
it's
already
five
of
us
so
plans
for
the
weekend
here,
chewie
you
want
to
start
now
that
you
just
showed
up.
B
Share
something:
to
be
honest,
I
think
that
I'm
gonna
stay
home
this
weekend,
like
I
like
mexico
city,
is,
is
a
lot
of
fun
during
the
weekends,
even
like,
through
the
whole
pandemic,
like
there's
just
like
too
many
people,
so
there's
always
something
to
do,
but
I,
I
think
I'll
I'll
stay
home
this
weekend.
My
my
girlfriend
went
on
vacation,
so
probably
I'll
just
watch
a
lot,
a
ton
of
movies
and
and
catch
up
with
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
stuff
from
from
tc.
B
Oh
yeah
yeah,
it's
been,
it's
been,
I
think,
like
a
week
and
a
half
since,
since
everything
got
settled
and
and
yeah
it's
been,
it's
it's
been
fantastic.
It's
been
really
good,
but
also
like
it's
a
matter
of
not
letting
like
the
big
city
get
into
you,
yeah
yeah.
I
pass
it
to
ivy.
C
Thanks
truly
wow,
it
is
easier
to
do
without
the
the
recorder.
I
can
easily
unmute
myself.
We
have
plans
for
the
weekend.
No,
nothing
is
really
special.
I'm
just
gonna
read
the
book
at
the
beach.
You
know
it's
really
good,
to
read
something
like
oh
at
the
beach,
because
I
haven't
done
it
the
past
days
because
we've
been
very
busy
so
yeah,
that's
the
only
plan
for
the
weekend
and
I
pass
it
to
17.
D
Thanks
ivy
yeah,
I
don't
have
like
big
plans,
I'd
probably
be
drafting
the
hatch
or
we
call
it
three.
The
thing
we're
gonna
write
the
hatch
text,
basically
like
the
when
we
have
on
the
page,
like
I'm,
going
to
draft
it
with
lauren
and
manu,
and
then
we
will
decide
and
then
yeah
keep
keeping
updated
with
the
conflict.
That's
happening
it.
I
feel
like
it's
exciting.
You
know
it's
it's
fun,
let's
see
like
for
me.
It
is.
A
E
Well,
I
think
that
this
weekend
I
might
go
visit
a
friend
who
has
who
lives
near
the
beach.
I
haven't
gone
to
the
beach
like
two
months.
E
Yeah,
so
I
am
going
to
go
to
the
beach
this
this
this
weekend
and
well.
I
I
feel
that
there
is
a
channel
for
the
for
for
for
this
forum
and
it's
precisely
the
forum,
so
you
can
like
open
the
forum
and
you
can
read
like
the
different
positions,
but
it's
around
the
the
results
of
the
price
distribution.
A
Yeah
the
price
issue,
all
right,
all
right,
I
didn't
know
it
was
something
new
or
or
it
was
about
the
praise,
all
right,
yeah
the
praise,
the
phrase
in
fact
ours,
good
all
right,
I'll
close
the
round.
It's
probably
gonna,
be
a
quiet
weekend
after
two
or
three
that's
been
a
little
bit
of
a
rush
of
reacting.
A
So
before
that
one
we're
we're
going
to
be
releasing
a
minor
minor
one,
which
is
a
thriller,
and
hopefully
I
will
be
able
to
share
with
you
in
in
a
few
weeks.
So
those
are
the
plans
for
the
weekend.
Now
there
was
again
for
those
that
came
late.
We
are
done
with
the
proposals
terms.
We
just
need
to
add
the
parameters
whenever
we
build
them.
Sean
is
not
going
to
be
able
to
join
us
today.
A
He
wasn't
feeling
too
good
and
on
on
top
of
the
terms
for
the
proposals,
we
had
the
the
review
of
the
rules
on
this
court
that
was
opened
last
week
when
katie
asked
to
take
a
look
at
them
from
the
legal
working
group,
and
I
think
since
we're
all
here-
and
they
are
quite
sure
we
maybe
we
can
review
them
together.
Let
me
share
the
screen
with
you
guys
and,
and
I
go
go
and
check
him
there.
A
There
we
go
so
those
are
the
rules
that
apparently
have
been
rewritten
or
there
might
be
some
changes,
and
maybe
we
can
just
go
together
and
and
go
on
a
quick
round,
and
everyone
can
say
what
they
what
they,
what
they
think
if
they,
if
they
believe,
there's
something
missing
or
there's
something
we
should.
F
A
A
A
From
my
perspective,
the
only
thing
that
I
would
add
here,
I
think
everything's
fine,
but
the
only
thing
I
would
add
was
that
point
that
we
were
talking
last
week
that
we
haven't
had
time
to
go
over,
which
is
maybe
making
a
mention
on
anything
posted
here
or
on
third-party
channels
from
any
member
of
the
thesis
beyond
the
control
of
tec.
And
so
anyone
knows.
B
B
Yes,
I
the
first
two
paragraphs
it
just
I
don't
know
if
it's
me,
but
it
would
just
make
sense
to
switch
them
like
to
start
with
we're
glad
to
have
you
here.
This
discord,
server
is
for
everything
and
then
like
stating
the
terms
like
by
picking
up
the
check
at
the
bottom
and
yeah
I
was
gonna,
add,
probably
in
when
it
says,
utilizing
the
platform
in
which
such
meetings
are
being
held.
B
B
A
C
E
I
would
say
that
adding
the
calendar,
we
have
the
calendar
in
the
tab
that
says
schedule,
but
it
would
be
good
also
to
have
that
there,
okay,
yeah.
A
A
F
A
All
right
I'll,
just
I'll,
just
fill
in
the
issue
from
katie
and
we're
good
to
go
all
right.
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
else,
just
wanna
discuss
from
legal
or
well
before
we
move
forward
and
seeing
and
and
now
that
you're
also
here
with
I've
been
since
the
you
know,
the
amount
of
american
legal
is
starting
to.
You
know,
get
smaller
and
smaller.
A
I
was
thinking
on
maybe
making
it
every
other
week
instead
of
every
week
and
and
of
course
we
always,
we
always
can
jump
into
anything
if,
if
it's
needed
and
if
it's
if
it
appears,
but
I
will
probably
announce
that
meetings
are
gonna
start
to
be
bi-weekly.
Okay,
all
right,
yeah,
just.
A
Before
before
yeah
before
you
join
before
you
move
forward
for
those
who
joined,
we
sean
is
not
able
to
be
here
with
us
today.
He
wasn't
feeling
good
and
we've
decided
since
the
latest
weeks.
We
we're
almost
almost
you
know,
done
or
getting
ready
done
with
legal
stuff,
we're
going
to
be
running
bi-weekly
meetings
instead
of
weekly
and,
of
course,
we'll
leave
the
empty
spaces
or
room
to
be
able
to
jump
in
and
discuss
any
little
issues
that
may
arise
if
needed.
A
All
right,
we
are
done
and
we're
gonna
leave
with
you
know,
share
with
us
all
the
whatever
arms
he
wants
to
bring
to
the
meeting
now
that
period,
all
right.
So
all
viewers
with.
F
Cool
and
so
I'll
share
stream
screens
here,
there's
a
well
actually
maybe
I'll
get
this
agenda
doc.
Make
sure
that
this
is
accessible,
yeah
post
it
in
legal,
actually
I'll
post
in
the
parameters
thing,
because
parameters
is
just
taking
over
anyway
we're
taking
over.
Let's
see
around
run
off
agenda,
so
I
we
have
some
questions
that
for
for
the
community
stewards
call
today.
F
And
and
but
I
want
to
mostly
like
show
off
some
data
and
talk
about
some
options
like
I
feel
like,
we
have
a
good
opportunity
to
clean
up
the
clean
up
the
github
and
the
posts
and
make
them
a
little
bit
easier
to
read
instead
and
reordering
them-
and
I
would
you
know
this
is
a
how
exactly
we
do
that
I'd
be
really
curious
to
hear
people's
thoughts
like
yeah.
Do
we
want?
What
do
we
want
at
the
top
for
people
to
read?
F
You
know
like
we
could
put
those
there,
obviously,
that
one
table
that
was
like
really
tiny
it'd
be
nice
to
make
it.
You
know
actual
markdown,
so
you
can
read
it
and
then
maybe
remove
like
the
non-redeemable
column
in
this
order
column,
because
they're
not
very
useful
and
like
and
really
kick
up
these
strategies,
and
I
was
thinking
that
would
be
like
something
that
we
would
do
for
the
final
ones
that
we
choose.
F
D
D
A
Something
I
I
I
would
love
to
to
be
able
to
go
over
all
the
information
on
the
on
the
on
the
issues
that
make
it
to
the
final
round,
but
I
would
also
love
to
have,
like
you
know,
sort
of
like
like
a
place
where
we
can
easily
compare
them.
You
know
like
having
a
table
where
you
see
the
prompts
from
if
it's
gonna
be
three
or
five
of
them,
so
you
can
easily
taking
a
look
at
one
document.
A
You
can
go
deeply
into
each
one
of
them
to
you
know,
read
everything
and
look
all
the
information
that
the
creators
decided
to
put
there,
but
if
you
just
want
to
focus
on
the
main
difference
between
one
another,
just
taking
a
look
at
this
this
table
would
would
give
you
you
know
pretty
much
idea
of
the
main
difference
it
be.
You
know
minimum
amount
or
hours,
or
you
know
what
the
main
the
main
that
you
know
that
that
just
like
taking
a
load,
keep
you
taking
a
look.
D
F
F
Here's
how
they
rank
on
impact
hour
rate,
here's
how
they
rate
on
rage,
quit
percent
and
hatch
tribute,
and
try
to
focus
on
allowing
people
to
see
the
differences
of
the
proposals
as
opposed
to
from
a
higher
level,
as
opposed
to
looking
at
one
proposal
and
what
it
does
and
then
making
them
do
the
comparison
in
their
head.
So
I
think
that's
a
really.
A
F
A
A
They
see
a
big
difference,
but
sometimes
it's
good
to
put
contacts,
and
let's
say
we
raise
this
amount
of
money
rates
quitting
two
percent
difference
at
the
end
of
the
day
is
two
thousand
bucks
or
three
thousand
bucks.
You
know
it's
not
the
end
of
the
day,
because
sometimes
it
may
seem
that
the
five
percent
of
the
difference
may
be
a
big
amount
of
money
or
maybe
have
a
big
impact.
A
F
Honestly,
anyone
else
have
any
comments
on
improving
the
actual
like
what
the
actual
proposal
looks
like.
G
F
A
A
F
Well-
and
that
brings
up
another
that
brings
up
another
point-
is:
do
we
want
to
have
the
authorship
be
like
on
on
the
forefront
or
like
the
mvv?
We
took
it
away
and
made
it
kind
of
just
like.
Oh,
it's
anonymous.
D
F
A
F
Things
yeah:
we
could
even
do
like
a
a
video
guide
like
if,
like,
if
I
I
could
propose
all
of
these
things
and
try
to
be
non-biased
and
discuss
the
strategy
that
each
one
is
doing
and
the
differences
between
them,
like
maybe
first
start
with
like
this-
is
the
strategy
this
one.
This
is
the
strategy
of
that
one.
This
is
strategy
that
one
this
is
trying
to
do
that
one
and
then,
like
here's,
the
differences,
if
you
really
like
a
high
range
quit
this
is
this:
is
your
guy?
F
If
you
like,
a
high
hatch
tribute
well,
these
two
both
have
pretty
high
hash
tributes.
You
know
this
and
then,
but
or
but
I
also
really
like
debates.
I
think
it
is
kind
of
fun
to
have
like
one
person
say
this
is
like
have
have
it
be
political,
you
know
and
have
different
people
say.
This
is
what
I'm
voting
for,
and
I
stand
behind
it.
G
F
Cool,
well,
those
are
just
some
thoughts
to
start
seating
it
in
your
minds
and
we'll
discuss
it
more
later.
Today.
F
I
also
want
to
show
off
the
spreadsheet
iv
major
praise
to
ivy
for
helping
put
in
all
of
this
data.
We
have
all
of
the
proposals
here
in
and
and
their
data,
so
it's
it
will
be
easy
to
play
with
there.
Here's
here's
the
proposals
ranked
by
how
many
votes
they
got
so
this
this
is
like
the
top
three
there's
kind
of
a
big
drop
off
between
easy
like
a
sunday
morning
and
crystal
ball
fork.
F
You
know
like
if
you
look
at
vote
for
my
params.
He
had
basically
like
a
flat
thing
where
the
target
goal
was
the
impact
hour
rate-
I
I
don't
know,
and
he
had
a
51
percent
of
support
required
the
he
had
some
outliers
right,
a
hundred
for
the
toll
gate
fee.
So
he
he
had
some
outliers
he
may
have
been
designing.
This
is
actually
deckins
and
and
he's
like
from
the
dow
house
community,
my
god.
This
is
how
I
would
create
my
molec
period.
F
You
know
and
not
thinking
about
the
context
of
commons
upgrade
and
stuff
like
that
and
then
so
a
lot
of
these
at
the
bottom.
F
I
think
maybe
we
should
just
cut
off
because
they're
kind
of
they
have
a
lot
of
outliers
in
them
or
they
they
also
received
a
lot
of
votes,
and
so
I
did
like
averages
weight
and
weighted
average
based
off
like
the
tokens.
F
So
like
the
number
of
votes-
and
you
get
some
weird
numbers
like
like
yeah,
if
you
just
do
an
average-
and
you
include
some
of
those
ones
at
the
bottom,
you
get
some
really
weird
numbers
and
I
don't
think
it's
necessarily
indicative
of
what
the
community
was
was
voting
on
and
even
when
it's
weighted,
you
get
some
weird
numbers
so
yeah.
F
So
that's
that's
just
this
spreadsheet,
oh
and
actually
at
the
top.
I
did
a
just
a
quick
analysis
of
like
the
of
the
top
three
like.
Was
there
a
range
of
choices
you
know
for
each
parameter
so
for
target
goal?
We
had
one
to
three
million:
there's
no
big
target
goal
as
an
option
for
max
goal.
There
was
no
small
max
goal
there,
like
they're
all
about
medium
to
high
there's,
no
big
minimum
goal.
It's
like
hey.
F
We
fail
if,
if
we
there's
just
hot
me
low
and
medium
the
looking
at
the
impact
hour
rates,
the
top
three
all
have
well
so
easy
like
a
sunday
morning
is
very
biased
or
not
very
but
more
bias
towards
the
impact
hours.
People,
the
the
builders,
I
would
say
zepty
and
eight-
are
both
kind
of
middle
of
the
road,
and
but
there
were
many
proposals
that
were
way
harder
on
the
total
supply
given
to
builders.
F
So
we
could
probably
use
one
of
those
to
get
mixed.
The
membership
ratio
has
a
good
spread
like
I
think
we
have
diversity
there.
F
F
There's
a
no
small
hatch
tribute
chewie,
one
apparently
they're
all
medium
to
hot,
to
they're
all
medium,
so
we
found
everyone
wanted
to
just
be
you
know,
settling
and
say:
oh
it's,
okay,
chewie,
the
tributers
and
the
rage.
Quitters
are
both
right
and
then
they're
all
they
all
have
a
high
soap
support
required.
But
that's
that's!
Okay,
like
the
average
support
required
was
was
80.
Weighted
average
was
82
so
like
like
it's
probably
fine.
F
A
minimum
quorum
has
a
nice
spread,
4,
8
and
10.,
no
giant
minimum
quorums,
but
there
weren't
very
many
giant
minimum
quorums
again.
The
weighted
average
is
right
in
the
middle
there's,
no
long
vote
options,
it's
either
three
or
four
days.
The
vote
buffer
time
was
all
the
same.
F
There
was
either
one
or
two
days
for
rage,
quits
and
the
toll
gate
fee
has
a
nice
spread
so,
like
you
can
see.
Some
of
these
have
like
some.
There
are
some
gaps
in
these
three
proposals
that
we
may
want
to
fill
with
our
choice
of
other.
F
And
then
here
you
can
see
the
the
tables
of
I
removed
the
impact
I
removed
the
non-redeemable
column
and
the
first
column,
that's
just
a
number
zero
to
one
or
zero
to
37
and
then
here's
their
numbers,
and
I
assume
that
when
we
have
like,
maybe
we
whittle
it
down
to
like
three
or
four
other
choices
that
we
want
to
include.
Then
we
make
their
tables
here
and
try
to
make
a
decent
spread
of
options
for
these
out.
F
And
then
the
last
thing
I
actually
didn't
finish,
because
I
kind
of
was
thinking
that
maybe
this
is
just
boring
or
not
boring,
but
you
know
the
original
thought
was
that
we
use
this
runoff
time
to
discuss
the
like
okay,
so
this
was
forked
off
of
that.
Did
they
steal
votes
from
each
other
and,
like
I
do
think,
there's
a
little
bit
of
stealing
votes
from
each
other,
but
not
really
so
much
or
like.
Also,
I
don't
know
how
much
we
can.
F
I
don't
know
exactly
like.
I
was
using
github
to
compare
them,
but
I
feel
like
maybe
they
need
to
be
compared
more
like
mount.
London
did
where
it's
like.
Okay,
how
many
of
these
things
have
the
same
parameters
and
like
kind
of
like
give
each
one
a
do
more
data
analysis
than
I
think
we're
going
to
do
on,
like
which
ones
of
these
were
similar
and
had
similar
outputs
or
similar
things,
and
then
like
kind
of
give
a
a
weight
to
similar
choices.
F
F
And
some
of
them
were
like,
oh,
I
changed
one
parameter
like
durgados,
really
forked
zepties
and
changed
just
like
tweets
like
two
parameters,
you
know,
so
he
really
did.
These
votes
basically
are
votes
for
septies.
You
know,
but
goldilocks
v4,
for
instance,
is
inspired
by
aids,
inspired
by
goldilocks,
inspired
by
crystal
ball.
F
F
So
yeah
I
don't
know,
maybe
we
can
just
do
a
round
of
sense
making,
and
I
would
like
to
just
hear
people's
thoughts
on
how
we
should
go
about
picking
the
last
the
last
thing
and,
if
there's
any
work
that
can
be
done
on
the
spreadsheet
or
work
that
should
be
done
before
our
call
today.
F
F
F
B
Because
of
I
would
have
agreed
on
on
having
the
first
five,
but
because
of
of
what
you're
mentioning
about
how
they
are
like
related
in
a
way
I
yeah,
I
would
say,
like
let's,
let's
go
for
the
top
three
but
but
yeah.
I
guess
it's
a
it's
a
matter
of
of
checking
like
the
the
temperature
but
yeah.
Maybe
maybe
crystal
ball
fork,
but.
B
Yeah,
like
I,
I
think
the
top
three
are
are
just
like
an
on
spot
I'll,
pass
it
to
craig.
H
Yeah
hi,
thanks
for
all
the
work
griff,
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
spreadsheet,
but-
and
I
only
came
in
about
halfway
through
so
but
I
yeah,
I
think,
like
chewie,
I
don't
have
a
you
know.
My
my
brain
is
just
not
wrapped
around
anything
yet
so
I'll
pass
it.
While
I'm
thinking
to
asanti.
A
Thank
you
craig.
I
I
think
I
think
you
have
done
a
wonderful
job
with
the
spreadsheet
and
trying
to
visualize
those
proposals
that
are
not
worth
taking
long
because
they
were
not
representative
like
the
bottom
ones
and
just
focusing
on
the
top
three
and
then
having
a
deeper
analysis
on
the
top
three.
A
A
I
was
waiting
till
almost
very
last
minute
to
start
boarding
and
any
even-
and
I
waited
a
little
bit
to
see
how
the
boats
started
moving
before
finalizing
my
my
voting
power
to
me,
focusing
on
the
top
three,
which
is
probably
the
why
this
is
the
wisest
way
to
move
forward
and
trying
to
visualize
the
main
difference
between
them,
because
if
there's
things
that
they
they
don't
make
too
much
difference,
it's
it's.
You
know
it
doesn't
make
too
much
it's
good
to
know.
A
You
know
everyone
has
to
know
what
what
that
parameter
means,
but
trying
to
focus
on
the
main
okay.
This
one
is
leading
to
more
or
less
this
type
of
outcome,
and
this
one
is
going
to
this
one
and
and
having
producing
that
video
or
having
a
session
where
someone
that's
not
created,
then
three,
like
you
agree
or
you
know,
can
explain
more
or
less
what
the
outcome
could
be
with
a
parameter
from
this
proposal
or
a
parameter
set
from
these
other
and
what
are
the
main
difference
between
them?
A
I
think
that's
that's
an
awesome
way
to
even
for
those
that
don't
want
to
go
deeply
into
the
proposals
or
those
that
don't
really
understand
some
of
the
parameters
just
listening
or
looking
at
that
video
or
joining
that.
You
know
that
call
it's
a
fantastic
way
to
you
know
given
a
chance
to
vote
wisely
on
and
get
involved
in
the
process,
so
from
all
the
data.
A
Sometimes,
if
we
get
a
lot
of
information,
we
get
too
deep
in
the
information,
and
we
forgot
to
see
the
forest
and
and
to
me
trying
to
focus
on
those
things
that
are
really
different
and
make
a
real
difference,
although
most
of
the
parameters
are
different,
but
if
there
are
slight
differences,
you
know
it
it.
It
shouldn't
be
relevant
to
you
know
waste
too
much
too
much
time
on
there
and
that's
that
to
me.
A
That
would
be
what
I
would
love,
so
anyone
that
even
people
who
come
later
late
or
joined
the
tc-
you
know
not
from
a
few
weeks
ago,
and
it's
not
been
on
the
process
and
might
be
a
little
confused
of
some
of
these
parameters.
You
know
having
an
explanation
on
that
it.
It
would
be
great.
That's
that's
my
point
here.
I
think
I'll
pass
it
to
tom.
G
Yeah,
I
guess
the
first
thought
I
have
is
like
I'm
not
convinced.
We
should
not
include
number
four,
because
the
there
are
some.
You
know
the
not
the
hat,
the
mint
rating.
Okay,
it's
not
very
important.
Maybe,
but
it
seemed
like
there
are
some
the
tool
gate
fee.
There
are
some
differences
that
four
stand
out
between
between
one
two
and
three.
G
I
think
that
there's
enough
similarity
that
maybe
it'll
be
worth
including,
but
I
think
we
can
look
at
that
later
too
and
then
I'd
say
if
we're
if
the
objective
is
to
make
it
as
easy
as
possible
for
people
who
are
gonna
have
30
minutes
to
an
hour
to
come
and
look
at
three
things
to
to
have
an
informed
vote
on
them.
I
would
say
that
I'm
going
to
repeat
myself
and
I'm
going
to
keep
saying
this
over.
G
What
does
80
mean
for
impact
hour
rate
with
the
slope
of
200,
and
I
don't
so
just
to
say
and
what
it
means
is
impact
hour
rate
is
this
yes
and
then
the
second
thing
is
maybe
like
an
a
table
that
just
says
all
of
the
parameters
and
describes
the
in
like
what
the
result
is
for
each
of
those
choices,
so
the
target
goal,
and
then
you
know,
choice
a
choice,
b,
choice
c
with
this
target
goal:
these
are
the
you
know:
possible,
expected
outcomes
for
choice,
a
for
choice,
b
per
choice,
c,
the
same
thing
with
you
know,
hatch
minting,
just
it's
like
in
just
describing
what
the
outcome
is
because
of
that
choice,
and
then
I
think
we
should
start
to
make
changing
the
names
like
anonymizing.
G
It
now,
instead
of
aids,
table
zepp,
and
I
think
we
should
maybe
like
just
start
calling
it
a
b
and
c
or
whatever
we
want
to
call
it.
You
know
pancake
and
donut
and
ice
cream
cone,
but
yeah
and
even
in
our
session
tonight,
maybe
we
can
just
totally
get
start
getting
rid
of
the
association
with
the
previous
ones.
F
C
Thanks
tom,
oh
when
I'm
comparing
the
parameters,
I
think
it
also
makes
more
sense
to
me
to
have
to
keep
this
only
three
proposals,
because
there
are
enough
similarities
and
enough
differences.
C
So
it's
easier
to
compare
and
yeah
and
we
don't
have
to
check
parameters
one
by
one
and
just
have
like
a
bigger
context
like
what
the
others
have
said
and
like
create.
Maybe
it's
better
to
also
have
a
sample
scenario
for
each
proposal.
So
it's
easier
to
understand
the
the
outcome
of
this
numbers,
because
it's
it's.
For
example,
for
me,
it's
hard
to
digest
these
numbers
until
tom
gave
me
a
scenario.
What
would
happen
if
this
number
we
have
this
number
for
this
parameter
so
yeah?
C
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
have
like
just
a
short
scenario
for
the
outcome
of
each
of
this
chapter,
so
that
one
for
me-
and
I
just
understand
ivy.
C
Yep
yep
yeah,
because
these
three,
this
top
three
proposals,
have
enough
similarities
and
and
differences
to
compare
them.
G
Can
I
just
add
one
thing
because
I
think
it's
a
really
good
point
ivy
and
in
fact
it's
really
that
now
I'm
looking
at
it,
it's
really
the
hatch
tribute
of
number
four
that
is
really
lower
than
the
rest
and
I
think
that's
sort
of
the
one
that
made
me
think.
Oh,
it's
interesting
to
have
one
with
a
very
low
hatch
tribute
sorry,
one
year
I'll
pass
back
to
you.
E
Yeah,
well,
I
think
that
for
this
runoff
it
would
be
good
to
do
the
same,
that
we
did
for
the
mbb
runoff
and
these
two
posts
from
a
neutral.
E
So
I
can
post
them
if,
like
no
one
complains
or
or
have
anything
to
say
like
against
it,
I
can
post
them
the
the
three
proposals-
and
I
think
I
have
like
several
topics
to
to
to
like
see
this
this
this
thing,
and
I
see
that
one
thing
that
it
makes
this
information
harder
to
understand,
is
quadratic
boating
and
not
like
one-on-one
boat,
because,
like
tom
said
that
she,
like
put
all
her
all
her
voting
power
to
her
proposal,
and
maybe
there
were
people
that
spread
their
voting
power
and
like
that,
makes
that
only
like
one
people
like
putting
a
lot
of
of
their
voting
power
may,
like
yeah,
may,
have
shown
their
proposal
yeah
on
on
the
top,
but
more
for
one
people
like
supporting
it
a
lot,
rather
than
a
lot
of
of
of
of
multiple
support
for
several
so
yeah.
E
I
think
that's
a
thing
that
makes
this
a
little
difficult
to
to
to
see,
and
the
other
thing
is
that
for
me,
I
have
this
this
concept
of
like
credibly,
neutral
criteria,
and
I
think
that
it's
good
that
we
don't
say
like
hey.
I
chose
these
parameters
because
I
like
them
but
or
or
like
or
because
that's
like
my
subjective
way
of
seeing
them,
but
rather
like
having
an
external
reference
point
to
what
we
can
claim
off
and
we
can
say
hey.
E
Why
did
you
choose
your
parameters
and-
and
it's
not
like
yeah,
because
I
wanted
so,
but
we
can
have
like
this
external
reference
to
say
like
okay,
this
was
my
guiding
principle.
That's
what
I
mostly
like
about
eight
and
it's
like
hey
what?
What
is
your
sense,
making?
No
our
sense
making
our
principle,
our
our
our
like
reference
is.
Is
this
number?
E
So
I
I
don't
know
if
I
think
it's
good
for
the
proposals
to
to
be
like
easy
to
explain
and
also
to
make
them
have
like
certain
rationale
behind
or
certain
proportion
that
we
say.
Okay
numbers
scale
between
this
and
this,
and
it's
not
like
presented
like
yeah
in
in
this
order,
but
somehow
making
it
like
harmonious.
E
I
think
that,
and
also
like
simple
things,
even
in
this
complex
context,
are
always
better
to
make
simple
things,
and
my
other
point
was
that
if
we
are
going
to
make
three
proposals,
I
think
that
we
have
to
be
very
careful
to
not
make
the
proposals
like
polarizingly
different
because,
like
we
have
been
seeing
that
there
has
been
like
a
lot
of
discussion
around
the
distribution,
and
maybe
if
we
make
the
proposals
for
polarizingly
different
or
like
once
too
much
good
for
for
one
people
and
once
all
too
much
good
for
other
people,
we
can
cause
a
division,
and
rather
than
that,
we.
E
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
to
find
the
common
point
that
can
benefit
us
all
and
can
benefit
the
backers
and
the
builders,
and
that
no
one
feels
like
excluded
from
the
question.
So
I
think
that
those
proposals
should
be
caring
and
should
be
not
polarizingly
different
between
each
other
yeah
and
I
passed
to
suga.
I
Thank
you
fun.
I'm
really
appreciating
everybody's
feedback
yeah
in
particular
what
you
just
said
about
not
polarizing,
also
regarding
the
mvv
and
noticing
that,
just
in
terms
of
vote
count,
there
is
a
big
jump,
and
this
was
probably
already
mentioned.
Sorry,
I
was
late.
Excuse
me,
there's
a
big
vote
job
between
the
third
and
the
fourth-
and
I
don't
know-
maybe
already
addressed
that,
but
that
that
seems
relevant.
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
insight
on
the
the
data,
but,
to
that
end,
what
ivy
and
tam
were
saying
and
also
true.
I
D
Yeah
regarding
the
voting
it's
quadratic
voting,
so
it
depends
on
the
skin
on
the
game.
So
if
someone
wants
to
vote
themselves,
I
feel
that's
fair,
then,
for
the
proposals
on
a
normal
stage,
I
would
go
with
the
three
we
have
on
the
top,
but
regarding
the
issue,
I
really
think
the
need
of
having
one
proposal
that
benefits
the
vehicles.
I
really
feel
it's
needed
just
in
case,
like
the
people
with
usd
case,
wants
to
vote
for
that,
and
that
should
be
a
thing.
We
don't
want
to
exclude
anyone,
but
yeah.
D
That's
what
I
think
I
mean.
I
don't
know
how
to
add
it
like
it's
without
any
controversial
thing,
because
if
you
look
at
the
chart
like
there
is,
these
proposals
are
not
in
a
high
spot,
but
I
feel
somehow
we
should
add
them,
but
I
don't
know
how
and
when
or
yeah
and
I'll
pass
it.
J
Just
to
reiterate
what
others
have
said,
I
think
five
is
too
much
three
might
be
ideal,
but
at
the
end
of
presenting
all
of
them
you
should
be
able
to
at
least
remember
what
has
been
presented
before
without
looking
at
the
numbers,
so
maybe
either
three
or
four.
Just
because
I
would
say
for
four
because
that's
like
representative
and
three,
the
fourth
one,
it's
not
entirely
seen
in
the
other
three
think
of
diversity
and
having
the
good
number
for
it
I'll,
say
three
or
four
so
yeah,
that's
it
for
my
site.
J
I
think
centralized
sdgs
left
right.
K
Hi
thanks,
I
am
no.
I
was
just
reflecting
on
on
this.
I
mean
one
was,
I
think,
just
to
think
around
lessons
learned
and
having
these
type
of
details
set
out
at
the
onset
support.
I
mean
even
having
advertising
this,
I
think,
would
be
a
good
contribution
to
quadratic
voting
and
actually
just
sort
of
governance,
so
that
there's
clarity
of
the
onset.
K
Main
point
because
I
think
there's
I
also
had
just
wanted
to
throw
out
this
idea
and
not
for
this
one,
but
just
sort
of
a
general
thought
was
like
how
to
how
to
have
an
objective
criteria
upon
which,
like
an
evaluation
like
an
application,
you
would
have
objective
criteria
how
much
to
rank
them,
which
allows
for
this
ease
of
understanding
that
people
have
mentioned,
and
I
was
thinking
around
like
how
would
you
grade
them
from
like
token
engineering,
if
they
already
have
set
your
metrics
beforehand,
because
everyone
has
an
opinion.
K
I
think
that's
what
helps
consensus
as
well
as
like,
I
would
think
of
austria's
principles.
How
well
those
would
comply
sort
of
yeah
technical,
like
optimization
like
that,
was,
I
think,
mentioned
on
trying
to
find
that
consensus.
I
think
people
were
saying
like
to
make
sure
that
all
those
various
stakeholders
coming
out
things
for
different
respects
will
find
that
optimal
like
sweet
spot.
So
those
are
just
my
main
thought
and
but
on
this
actual
proposal
I
mean
it's
hard
also
to
make
a
decision
in
a
in
a
group.
K
I
mean
it's
it's
redundant
to
do
another
vote
to
see
how
to
vote.
I
mean
but
yeah.
I
was
thinking
more,
maybe
using
the
math,
where
those
that
would
never
become
viable
wouldn't
even
be
considered,
because
then
you
can
see
with
the
math
that
it
wouldn't
have
ever
so
sort
of
having
a
mathematical
or
objective
equation
to
make
the
decision
would
be
most
helpful.
So
I
was
trying
to
think
around
some
ideas
because
I
said
this
wasn't
so
clear
at
the
answer.
I
F
H
Yeah
but
I
didn't
say
anything
useful.
No,
I
I
appreciate
everyone's
comments.
I
guess
I'm
I
don't
have
a
strong
feeling.
I
guess
about
whether
it's
three
or
whether
it's
five,
I
feel
like
maybe
we're
wrapped
around
the
axle
a
little
bit
and
voting
to
vote
to
vote
and
then
just
a
general
observation
is.
H
I
don't
know
if
we
can
make
an
objective
decision
and
it
seems
that
I'm
hearing
a
lot
of
talk
about
discounting
subjectivity,
yet
we
are
here
trusting
the
people
building
this
with
their
subjective
choices,
and
so
I
would
just
generally
caution
against
this.
This
ideal
of
ultimate
objectivity
also
consensus.
It's
why
we're
voting
we're
not
going
to
get
consensus?
H
That's
why
there's
a
vote
in
place
so
yeah
I'll
stop
there.
F
Yeah,
I
I
I
would,
I
would
argue
that
to
I
would
agree
with
you,
craig
on
the
like
objectivity
versus
subjectivity,
I
think,
to
make
object
to
get
to
the
point
where
we
have
like
objective
ways
of
doing
this.
We
just
have
to
do
it
subjectively
a
few
times
and
then
be
able
to
gather
the
data
from
there
and
then,
with
that
data.
F
Now
we
can
make
objective
decisions,
but
until
you
know
it's
like
can't,
we
can't
go
too
fast
and
otherwise
it'll
just
be
subject,
you
know
it'll
be
like
oh,
the
data
people
will
just
get
to
decide
and
part
of
what
we
want
to
do
is,
and
technocracy
right
and
actually
be
human
to
be
a
human-centered
organization.
F
So
I
I
do
think
that
bringing
human
discernment
into
the
mix
is
is
important,
so
one
I
I
really
wish
we
could
have
three
like.
I.
I
think
I
also
think
three
is
like
the
right
number.
It's
the
easy
thing
to
vote
on
the
the
challenge
is
that
the
top
three
are
too
similar
in
one
important
category,
which
is
becoming
a
hot
topic
right
now,
which
is
the
impact
hour
rate,
and
so
because
I
made
these
tables-
and
you
can
see
like
so
the
first
one.
F
This
is
30
22
15..
This
is
43
30
18.,
so
that's
even
higher
than
the
other
two.
So
the
first
one
is
kind
of
the
lowest.
F
F
And
then
this
one
is
24
20
14.,
so
there's
like
if
we
include
a
fourth
one
or
move
one
of
these
third
third
ones,
to
get
a
to
get
one
of
the
get
one
of
these
lower
ones
it
might,
it
might
be
good.
The
other.
The
other
thing
which
is
hard
to
look
at
from
data
was
the
you
know.
F
The
goldilocks
idea
got
a
lot
of
votes
and
it's
like
that
concept
was
very
difficult
to
look
at
with
the
math,
but
basically
hey
what,
if
we
provide
round
numbers
for
people
to
see
right
like
in
this
like
be
making
a
marketing
approach
with
the
data,
the
primary
choices,
so
that,
because
that,
if
there
was
one
like
fork
that
may
have
split
some
votes
or
like
a
lot
of
people,
probably
voted
for
all
the
goldilocks
boats.
F
It's
that
one
and
now
that
I
removed
the
names
that
I
can't
see
them,
but
yeah.
So
there's
goldilocks,
v4,
goldilocks
v2,
the
original
goldilocks
choosing
the
litlux.
These
guys
had
a
nice
there's
a
nice
like
cluster
of
them
right
here
and
their
concept
was
hey.
Let's
make
it
easily
digestible
some
of
these
outputs
and
that's
like
hard
to
include
objectively
also.
F
Is
it
something
that
we
should
put
in
to
the
founding
anyway
thoughts
we're
at
the
top
of
the
hour,
and
I'm
sure
everyone
has
other
things
to
run
off
to
thanks
for
letting
me
take
over
guys.