►
Description
Timecodes
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
02:10 - Agenda
06:40 - Conviction voting to reward contributor
25:09 - Terms for Github contributors
35:58 - Hacking on hatch doc
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
My
intention
is
to
share
with
you
a
couple
on
top
of
working
on
that
document,
which,
depending
on
how
many
of
us
we
are,
maybe
I'll
I'll,
just
spend
some
time
with
grief
during
the
weekend
to
do
it
and
try
to
get
rid
and
finish
that
document.
I
want
to
also
share
with
you
some.
A
I
would
like
to
introduce
some
discussion
on
on
the
impact
hours
and
the
the
contributions
once
we
already
live
after
the
hatching
phase
and
also
share
with
you
a
much
shorter
document
legal
document
for
the
terms
on
the
github
contributions
of
any
any
member
okay.
So
that's
the
intentions
for
today
and
instructions
no
distractions
at
all,
so
I'm
focused
on
the
meaning.
B
C
Okay
and
those
problems
at
the
moment
are
a
bit
hot
down
here,
we've
been
having
some
50
degrees
weather,
so
it's
trying
to
chill
out
no
distractions
at
the
moment.
A
No
not
there
well
anyway,
let's,
let's
start
so
in
the
agenda.
That
is
basically
what
we
were
sharing
last
week
and
let
me
share
with
you
my
screen
here:
let's
see
if
it.
C
A
You
do
all
right,
okay,
so
what
I
wanted
to
share
with
you
is
this
diagram
here.
This
is
I've
been
working
with
with
mateo
on
the
source,
cred
contribution
method
that
we're
gonna
probably
be
launching,
although
it
will
go
through
a
proposal
and
the
voting
from
the
community
before
we
launch
it,
but
we
will
implement
once
the
the
the
tech
is
already
up
and
running
now.
The
idea
is
to
have
different
ways
to
praise
the
contribution
from
the
members.
A
We
think
that
probably
we're
gonna
keep
working
with
the
the
method
that
we
have
right
now,
using
telegram
and
the
phrase
hours
that
we
collect
every
other
week,
and
on
top
of
that,
we
will
try
to
add
other
methods
like
source
grid.
For
those
who
don't
know,
source
cred
is
a
is
a
system
that
was
created
by
by
the
people
of
source
cred
and
it's
implemented
on
maker
dao
and
on
one
hive.
Basically,
is
a
method
that
automatically
gets
the
actions
of
the
members
of
our
group
on
on
three
different
services.
A
Right
now,
discord,
github
and
and
the
forum
you
can
decide.
We
chose
those
and
which
actions
on
those
you
collect
and
depending
on
the
amount
of
of
activity
of
every
single
account
you
give
some
weights
and,
at
the
end,
you
give
away
some
some
tokens
usually
for
for
the
contributions
that
that
people
has
has
been
going
through.
A
So
my
idea
was
today
to
not
talk
so
much
about
about
this
method,
although
I
can
explain
to
anyone
who
is
interested
too,
but
the
idea
is
to
open
up
a
discussion
on
what
do
you
think
in
legal
terms
would
be
the
implications
of
of
giving
giving
away
tokens
or
any
kind
of
of
well
token
or
contribution
any
kind
of
of
of
monetary.
A
Gift
to
to
people
who's
contributing,
what
do
you
think
the
implications
would
be
so
lawrence?
What
was
was
here?
Let
me,
let
me
read
here.
C
A
A
Grief,
so
here
is
lawrence,
he's
he's
typing
again.
I
guess
he's
still
having
problems
with
his
computer.
A
So
you're
mentioning
that
is
the
weight
complexity,
giving
away
tokens
dilutes
the
change
against
the
die
on
contributed.
A
Well
that
that
it
all
depends
well.
I
agree
that
the
weights
are
complex
and
that's
why
we're
making
it
simple.
We
the
test
that
we're
running,
is
leaving
away
discord
and
we're
just
playing
with
the
forum
and
github,
and
so
complexity
can
be
as
big
as
you
want.
There's
plenty
of
options.
You
can
leave
away
many
of
them.
A
If
you
want
and
start
simple,
then
this
is
what
we're
gonna
gonna
be
doing,
or
this
is
the
proposal
we
will
will
bring
to
the
community
to
both,
but
the
the
delusion
of
of
the
I
contributed.
The
idea
is
to
have
source
credit
once
the
tech
is
up
and
running,
and
you
the
way.
Usually,
this
works
is
that
the
community,
someone
in
the
community,
launched
launches
a
proposal
requesting
some
funds
to
give
away
to
contributors.
A
A
But
but
the
intention
of
the
discussion
here
was
more
from
a
legal
perspective,
not
from
a
from
a
financial
perspective
or
from
a
complexity
perspective,
which
I
completely
agree
that
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
there,
but
from
from
a
little
perspective,
if
we're
giving
away
any
any
valuable
token.
A
What's
what's
what's
your
point
of
view.
A
So,
let's
wait
till
lawrence
keeps
typing,
and
maybe
someone
ends
someone
else
can
can
tell
us
what
what
they
think.
What
do
you
think
is
optimus
yeah.
B
I
don't
know
the
legal
terms
of
the
giving
away
tokens,
but
I
really
think
that
that
idea
that
you
just
mentioned
of
doing
a
test.
It's
amazing
and
we
could
also
during
the
test
to
stuff,
like
you
know,
for
example,
like
try
to
gamify
this
source
credit.
So
in
the
future,
when
there
is
a
test
like
if
something
hap,
we
just
tried
to
do
all
the
tricks
before
implementing
the
the
good
one.
I
think
that
would
be
great.
A
Right,
that's
the
idea
of
the
test
with
source
grid
to
run
several
weeks
and
and
see
the
outcome
and
start
really
really
simple,
with
many
just
a
very,
very
few
variables.
Instead
of
the
hundreds
that
you
can,
you
can
tweak
and
and
and
from
there
to
the
outcome
and
and
maybe
a
little
bit
introduce
new
ones,
so
hello,
olivia
and
and
hello
again,
griff.
We.
C
A
We're
here
discussing
what
could
be
the
legal
implications
for
the
tech
when
we
give
away
any
reward
to
contributors
to
any
reward
system.
Like
the
praise
that
we.
A
D
So
once
we've
launched,
the
tec
is
its
own
effectively
a
general
partnership,
so
it
every
individual
who
interacts
with
it
would
be
would
probably
need
to
claim
their
funds
as
some
sort
of
thing,
but
there
wouldn't
necessarily
be
a
legal.
I
mean
we
do
not
have
a
legal
entity
in
any
jurisdiction.
D
D
It's
the
way.
I
would
see
it
and
it's
like
the
funds
that
we
would
use
to
to
fund
sports
cred
and
praise
of
whatever
reward
system
we
use
would
have
to
come
from
conviction
voting,
so
people
the
people
with
them
with
tec
tokens
would
vote
on
whether
or
not
they
want
to
top
up
the
pools
for
source,
cred
and
praise.
D
So,
on
the
legal
side,
it's
everything
after
we
launch
is
pretty
easy
on
the
legal
side,
because
it's
like
it's
a
dao,
we
don't
know
and
then
that's
that's
really
all
we
can
do
because
we
don't
we're
not
picking
a
legal
entity
we're
not
in
a
jurisdiction.
A
Okay,
well
that
I'm
reading
what
I
I
see,
your
point
grief
and
thank
you
for
for
your
point
of
view.
I'm
reading.
C
A
Lawrence
mentioned
here,
he
says
that
if
you,
if
given
four
hours,
contributed,
then
could
be
considered
employment
if
a
service
is
supplied
which
has
implications
under
the
eu
laws
for
volunteer
remuneration.
Well,
the
way
source
credit
is
implemented.
It's
not
ours
at
all.
It's
just
giving
a
like,
or
or
doing
some
actions
in
the
channels
like
adding
some
content
on
github
stuff,
like
that
we're
not
measuring
hours
at
all.
We're
measuring!
A
Or
a
picture
or
something
like
that,
so
I
I
don't
think
it
would.
It
could
be
considered
as
ours
at
all
as
contribute
to
ours
at
all,
and
maybe
the
praise
the
hours
praise
could.
But
but
again,
if
we
are
not
a
legal
entity,
there
is
no
way
they
can.
They
can
figure
out.
You
know,
so
we
will
see
that
we're
gonna
run
mm-hmm.
D
A
All
right,
hello,
matias,
you
wanna
you
wanna,
say
something
about
that.
A
E
Cool
yeah,
it's
my
first
10
minutes
on
this
server
and
I
was
just
popping
into
what
looked
like
an
active
voice
channel.
So
I'm
very
excited
to
be
part
of
this
server
now
and
I'm
trying
to
find
my
way
and
so
hope
I
don't
bother
you
guys.
No.
A
D
Quick
sure
sure.
So
this
is
the
token
engineering
discord
and
in
here
we
really
focus
on
the
engineering
work
behind
designing
economies
in
the
crypto
scene.
So
you
know
a
lot
of
if
you're,
pretty
familiar
you're,
pretty
familiar
with
cryptocurrencies
yeah.
F
D
I
I
you're
also
probably
pretty
familiar
with
white
paper
right.
A
lot
of
people
just
build
a
white
paper
and
they
say
this
is
a
future
billion
dollar
economy
watch.
It
watch
me
build
it
and
then
they
build
it
and
then
it
it
goes
sort
of
right
now
imagine
making
the
analysis
analogy
between
a
cryptocurrency
and
a
crypto
economic
system
and
a
bridge
right,
a
public
good
that
anyone
can
walk
across
these
this
bridge.
Anyone
can
use
a
cryptocurrency,
but
when
you
build
public
infrastructure,
there's
a
lot
of
engineering
work
that
goes
into
it.
D
There's
a
lot
of
like
like
advance
like
we
take
the
lessons
that
we
learned
from
before.
There's
certifications,
there's
regulations
around
it
because
it's
accessible
to
anyone.
Unfortunately,
in
cryptocurrencies-
that's
not
the
case,
we
don't
do
any
engineering,
it's
kind
of
like.
If
someone
had
this
white
paper
for
a
bridge
and
then
they
go
to
home
depot
and
they
just
start
building
it
right
and
that's
that's
the
state
of
cryptocurrencies.
D
So
in
the
token
engineering
discord
we're
trying
to
figure
out,
how
do
we
actually
engineer
these
systems
with
to
and
validate
our
designs?
And
that's
the
most
important
part
there's
a
huge
project
with
within
the
token
engineering
system.
That's
actually
using
token
engineering
to
fund
the
public
good
of
token
engineering
itself,
it's
a
little
holographic-
and
this
is
the
token
engineering
commons
so
we're
building
we're
creating
an
economy
around
the
value
creation
within
the
token
engineering,
space
itself
cool.
And
so
that's
that's.
The
download.
A
Thank
you
sounds
exciting
are
more
than
then
you're
invited
to
come
to
any
of
our
meetings
and
enjoying
our
community.
It's
it's
a
it's
open
to
anyone
who
wants
to
join.
So
it's
up
to
you
to
come
to
other
meetings
or
grab
some
more
information.
Whenever
you
want
okay,
hello,
olivia,
nice
to
see
you,
we
were
discussing
hello,
we
were
discussing
here
today.
A
The
I
think
you
were
already
here,
the
implications
of
the
legal
implications
that
we
might
have
giving
away
rewards
for
contributing
to
to
the
community,
once
we've
launched
through
source
cred
or
through
the
praise
system
that
we
already
have
or
any
additional
ones
that
we
may
that
we
may
include-
and
I
wanted
to
bring
these
up
today,
because
we've
been
testing
yesterday
with
material.
A
We
made
a
test
distribution
with
the
initial
data
that
we've
been
collecting
and-
and
I
just
thought
that
it'd
be
nice-
to
have
a
some
kind
of
discussions
and
get
the
point
of
view
of
everyone.
So
you
wanna,
you
wanna,
tell
us
your
yours.
F
D
Okay,
oh
zap
can
see
me
that's
for
sure,
so
the
first
impact
hours
that
we
dish-
those
will
just
happen
in
the
hatch
after
that,
when
we
have
the
new
praise
system
after
the
launch,
the
there
will
be
no
way
to
generate
new
tokens,
so
we
will
have
to
use
conviction,
voting
to
approve
any
expenditure,
and
I
would
imagine
that
we
can
be
a
little
more
creative
than
making
conviction
voting.
Do
every
single
one
conviction
voting
is
really
for
funding
small
sub
projects.
D
So
what
one
hive
does
is
conviction
voting
will
top
up
a
a
like
distribution
contract
or
a
you
know,
a
a
dow
that
is
in
charge
of
handling
source
credit
distributions
and
then
that
dow
ends
up
having
its
own
agency.
So
this
is
the
the
really
cool
thing
about
this
model.
Is
that
it's
not
it's
a
it's
a
funding
stream,
but
to
a
lot
of
small
sub
communities
that
will
and
and
like
teams
that
will
do
their
own
thing.
F
And
can
you
add
multiple
addresses
in
one
proposal
to
fund.
A
What
what
one
hive
is
doing
is
that
they
they've
created
a
dao
which
they
call
swarm.
They
have
different
dials
and
those
valves
are
integrated
by
different
members
of
one
hive:
five,
six,
ten,
whoever
they
have
their
voting
system,
which
is
10
million
and
they
get
the
funds,
and
those
in
that
dow
are
the
ones
who
decide
how
to
spend
those
funds.
A
There's
the
marketing
people,
which
I
forgot,
the
fauna,
I
think
it's
the
finance
forum
and
they
request
funds
to
a
proposal
and
once
they
get
the
funds,
they
are
the
ones
managing
those
funds
for
the
purpose
of
that
dao,
which
was
created
in
the
house
in
in
the
case
of
fauna
for
marketing,
indicate
in
case
of
of
source
credit.
It's
called
pollen.
I
think,
there's
six,
six
or
seven
members
of
the
pollen
swarm.
A
They
get
the
funds
and
they
decide
if
they
are
giving
away
this
much
amount
on
every
distribution
if
they
are
tweaking
the
parameters
this
way
or
this
other.
Of
course
they
listen
to
to
the
rest
of
the
group,
but
they
are
the
ones
voting.
And
if
you
want
to
be
a
member,
you
have
to
be
admitted
as
a
member
of
that
dao
and
and
and
just
be.
A
D
Goes
it's
it's
worth
noting
that
we
will
request
funds
in
extire
and
then
and
then
those
funds
we
will
receive
those
funds
the
next
day.
Now,
in
a
in
an
ideal
world,
we
would
have
everyone
convert
that
into
tbc
tokens,
and
it
would
be
a
positive
thing
in
our
crypto
economic
system
because
it
pumped
the
price
every
time
we
actually
pay
out
a
proposal
which
is
a
very
nice
system.
D
So
I
think
that
we
will
want
to
have,
like
you
know,
like
proposals
that
agree
to
use
the
funds
that
they
get
out
of
conviction,
voting
to
buy
tec
tokens,
I
hope,
will
be
favored,
but
but
it's
also
nice
because
you
can
get
like
to
not.
You
can
request
funds
denominated
in
usd
and
if
it
takes
a
month
to
get
those
funds
like
your
plans,
are
still
pretty
set.
You
know
you
still
get
the
amount
in
usd.
F
A
No
you
it's
like
it's
like
the
working
groups,
libya,
we
have
the
legal
working
groups.
Imagine
this
working
group
would
be
a
dao
okay.
Instead
of
just
a
group
of
people
and
a
steward
leading
okay,
it's
a
doll
and
the
dao
is
sobering.
It
decides
how
to
spend
and
how
to
give
away.
Of
course,
if
it's
impact
hours,
it's
gotta
be
using
the
system
that
the
general
dao
or
the
whole
group
have
decided.
A
But
if
there's
little
tweaks
that
they
can
play
with
it's
that
dao,
who
decides
how
to
use
those
tweaks
and
if,
for
instance,
there's
one
contributor
that
we
see
he's
a
cheater
he's
been
messing
around,
they
might
be
the
ones
not
on
when
they
do
the
distribution
they
decide
as
a
dog.
We're
not
gonna,
give
any
contribution
to
this
account,
and
maybe
we're
gonna
put
this
into
the
knowledge
of
the
whole
community
and
and
request
their
final
bow.
A
D
I
would
imagine
that
it
would
just
be
a
dow
of
four
or
five
people,
and
then
they
would
look
at
all
the
data
and
that
dow
can
send
well
right
now,
dao's
because
of
block
size
limit.
You
can
only
send
so
many
tokens
right
so
like
like
30
token
30
addresses
at
a
time,
but
you
could
like
we
do
it
with
the
common
stack.
Our
common
stack
dial
distributes
130
to
130
addresses,
see
stack
tokens
every
month
anyway.
D
D
A
Okay,
all
right
yeah,
that's
what
we
were
expecting
to
have
some
some
kind
of
app,
that's
already
built
in
in
one
hive
or
any
other
community
that
we
can
use
to
distribute
the
tokens
and
and
just
grabbing
the
information
from
source
cred
if
it's
source,
correct
or
from
the
impact
hours
or
from
any
other
system
that
we
may
use.
A
Okay,
let's
jump
to
another
topic
here.
This
is
a
shorter
one.
It's
the
I
was
requested
by
jake
if
we
could
take
care
of
the
terms
for
the
github
contributors
and
we
again
used
the
the
argon
template.
This
is
a
much
much
smaller
template
compared
to
the
to
the
hatching
face
template
that
we're
using
from
aragon,
jewelry,
and
I
basically
was
doing
that
this
morning.
I
was,
I
grabbed
the
information
from
their
github,
and
let
me
share
my
screen
with
you
again.
A
Okay,
all
right
so
here
this
is
a
markup
language
document,
so
I
just
copy
it
the
document
from
argon
and
I
switch
real
quick
argon
words
by
tc
and
it's
a
it's
a
very
short
document.
Maybe
we
can.
We
can
go
all
together
over
it.
So
initially
there's
the
definitions.
It
defines
what
a
contributor
is.
It
means
any
type
of
work
that
is
submitted
to
to
by
you
to
us,
and
initially
here
us
is
defined
as
tc,
okay
and
including
any
modifications
or
additions
of
existing
work.
Keep
in
mind.
A
A
Media
means
any
portion
of
contribution,
which
is
not
software
submit
or
submission
means
send
by
you
to
us
or
our
employees,
collaborators
or
other
representatives.
Maybe
we
should
get
rid
of
employees
here
throughout
any
form
of
electronic
verbal
or
written
communication,
but
excluding
those
expressively
marked
as
not
contribution
submission
date
meets
the
date
of
the
submission.
You
means
the
person
or
legal
entity,
including
its
affiliate
task,
to
accept
this
agreement.
A
An
affiliate
is
any
entity
that
controls
or
is
controlled
by
a
legal
entity
or
is
under
common
control
with
it
project
is
the
umbrella
term
that
refers
to
the
decentralized
application,
the
network
and
any
other
tec
open
source
projects.
Now,
basically,
a
copyright
license
you
grant
to
us
worldwide.
Non-Exclusive
royalty,
free,
transferable,
irrevocable
and
perpetual,
or
to
the
maximum
extent
permitted
by
the
relevant
law,
license
with
rights
to
slide
supplies
through
multiple
layers
of
supplies
and
system
reproduce
modify,
including
creating
directive
works
of
display,
perform
and
distribute.
A
A
Patent
license
you
grant
to
us
perpetual
or
to
the
maximum
extent
permitted
by
the
relevant
law
or
white
non-exclusive
transferable
royalty
revocable
license
over
the
patent
claims,
including
without
limitation
method
process
and
operate
and
apparatus
claims
which
you
own
control,
or
have
the
right
to
can
now
or
in
the
future,
with
the
right
to
sub
supply.
Since
these
rights
to
multiple
tiers
of
licenses
to
make
have
made
use,
sell,
offer
for
sale,
support
or
otherwise
transfer.
A
The
contribution
this
license
is
granted
only
to
the
extent
that
the
exercise
of
the
licensed
rights
infringes
such
patent
claims
and
that
this
license
is
conditioned
upon
compliance
with
clause
4.1
below
another
clause.
4.1.
Here
the
sub
licensees,
we
agreed
to
license
the
contribution
only
under
the
terms
of
this
license
or
licenses,
which
we.
C
A
Using
in
the
sub
on
the
submission
date
for
the
work
of
partnership,
which
is
made
available
to
us
to
third
parties
or
under
any
false
licenses
of
the
free
software
foundation
or
any
of
often
source
license
approved
by
the
open
source
initiative
or
any
license
created
or
drafted
by
tc
provided,
that's
htc
license
contains
essentially
the
same
terms
and
conditions
or
is
granted
under.
Essentially
the
same
principles
hold
on
hold
on
lawrence.
Let's,
let's
finish
it,
it's
it's
not
too
long
and
then
I'll
go
over
your
your
contributions
in
creative.
A
In
addition,
we
may
license
the
media
in
the
contribution
under
creative
commons
license
or
under
the
license
created
drafted
by
tc,
provided
that
such
dc
license
contains
essentially
the
same
terms
and
conditions
or
is
granted
under
essentially
the
same
principles
that
those
of
the
created
carbon
license
on
the
rights.
Your
wave
you
wave
and
agree
not
to
ask
any
moral
rights
you
may
have,
or
in
or
with
respect
to
contribution
against
us
for
our
licenses
contribution
you
represent
to
us
that
you
have
the
legal
authority
to
enter
into
this
agreement
at
each
of
your
submissions.
A
C
A
Any
third-party
rights,
the
contribution
is
provided
under
this
agreement
on
an
as-is
basis,
without
warranty
of
any
kind
either
expressed
or
implied,
including
without
limitation.
Warranties
of
the
contributions
is
free
of
defects,
merchantable
fit
for
a
particular
purpose
system
integration,
not
interference
and
accuracy
of
information
content.
The
extent
of
this
one
this
cannot
be
disclaimed
such
when
these
are
limited
in
duration
to
the
minimum
period
permitted
by
law.
A
In
no
event
shall
neither
party
be
legal
liable
under
this
agreement
for
any
and
direct
consequential
punitive
or
exemplary
damages
or
any
laws
for
profit,
whether
present
or
future,
boundaries
grants
and
boundaries
dc
may.
In
the
framework
of
this
agreement,
and
at
its
all
the
inspection
grant
you
a
certain
amount
of
funds
as
bounty
or
reward
for
your
contribution
in
using
this
the
funds,
the
contributor
shall
comply
with
appliable
laws,
regulations
and
rules
and
will
not
infringe
misappropriate
or
violate
the
intellectual
property
privacy
or
publicly
rights
of
any
third
party.
A
The
ec
shall
not
be
responsible
for
an
inappropriate
or
illegal
use
of
contributor
may
do
with
the
funds.
Thus,
the
contributor
shall
maintain.
Oh
here
there
is
aragon.
This
is
the
pc
fully
invent
regarding
issues
you
and
we
may
assign
all
rights
an
obligation
set
forth
within
this
agreement
to
a
third
party,
provided
that
such
third
party
agrees
in
within
to
all
rights
and
obligations
set
forth
here
and
finally,
the
government
jurisdiction
of
the
of
switzerland
and
the
city
of
zuk
in
in
switzerland.
A
I
know
it's
a
little
piece
of
information
here,
but
we
can
make
it
shorter.
I
think
lauren,
so
you
wanna,
do
you
wanna
share
your
inputs
here
I
was
reading
some
of
the
stuff
that
you
were
sending.
Let
me
let
me
see
here.
Let
me
stop
sharing
my
my
screen
here.
A
Let
me
read
what
what
lawrence
was
sending
here.
D
Well,
he
says
I'll
say
a
couple
things
I
don't
know
if
we
can
say
that
we
are
governed
by
the
laws
of
switzerland.
I
think
it'd
be
cool
to
say
that
by
the
laws
of
ethereum
and
next
die,
or
something
like
that
honestly
and
I
don't
know
how
we
can
do
that
also.
I
I
think
that
we,
this
is
a
great
starter,
but
it
needs
to
be
reviewed
by
soft
gov
and
gravity,
and
then
it
can
be
passed
once
once
they
add
their
things.
A
Right,
that's
the
first,
that's
the
first
iteration
I'll
just
grab
that
document
that
jay
gave
me
and
I
changed-
that
the
the
terms
of
argon,
except
for
that,
that's
still
missing
I'll
I'll,
send
that
document
to
you,
libby
and-
and
you
can,
you
can
discuss
it
and
work
on
it
from
on
on
socop
and
and
then
maybe
with
with
juan
carlos
and
and
then
and
then
we
decide.
I
think
if
we
can
make
it
shorter.
D
E
D
And
I
think
we
should
add
something
along
the
lines
of
like
the
dao
owns
the
code
and
is
the
only
one
who
can
agree
to
change
the
license.
I
think
that'd
be
pretty
cool.
F
Yeah,
that's
great.
We
had
this
big
session
on
the
code
of
conduct
today,
and
I
really
like
this.
What
was
it
called
definitions
section
in
the
document
you
were
reading?
I
think
we
should
definitely
have
something
like
that
kind
of
like
a
glossary
right
like
oh.
By
this
we
mean
this.
F
Have
that
in
the
beginning
of
the
document,
before
all
of
the
sections
and
yeah
use
it
as
an
intro.
A
Right,
I
agree
because
there's
many
terms
that
sometimes
we
give
for
granted
and
and
people
who
may
be
joining
for
the
first
time
may
not
be
aware
of
or
may
may
not
really
understand
what
we
mean
by
those
terms.
So
it's
it's
important
to
have
this
glossary
at
the
beginning
and
and
keep
adding
terms
as
we
need.
A
Okay,
now
it's
time
for
the
big
document
grief.
Can
you
share
that
screen
with
us?
You
will
see
that
libby
was
doing
a
great
job
yesterday
and
today
she
sent
the
document
back
to
me.
While
she
uploaded
up
upgraded
it
and
she
gave
it
a
nice
format
and
changed
every
place
where
argon
was
mentioned
by
dc.
A
We
also
changed
some.
I
think
we
changed
the
ethereum
by
xi.
I
think,
of
course
there
are
some
some
other
terms
that
need
to
that
need
to
be
worked
on,
but
we
can.
We
can
start
from
where
we
left
it,
and
maybe
I
was
I
was
thinking,
maybe
you
and
I
could
have
a
hacking
session
and
try
to
and
try
to
move
forward
with
that
document
sometime
during
the
weekend
or
or
monday
morning,.
D
Some
sunday
morning
for
me
would
work
great
okay,
that's
more
like
it
would
have
to
be
your
afternoon.
You
know
right.
A
A
So
but
it's
time
again
to
just
jump
deep
into
it
and
and
and
go
over
everything,
and
maybe
after
we
finish,
we
can
request,
we
can
request
lawrence
and
and
anya
to
go
over
it
once
we
consider
that
you
know
everything
has
sense,
not
not
absolutely
from
the
legal
perspective,
but
from
the
document
perspective.
A
A
D
I
was
going
to
suggest
that
maybe
we
all
just
go
in
here
and
hack
instead
of
just
watching
me,
do
it
that's
like
15
minutes
of
one
person,
but
we
could
storm
and
then
we'd
end
up
with
15
minutes
of
five
people.
All.
A
A
F
F
A
You
can
directly
change
it
and
and
or
highlight
it
whatever
you
want.
I'm
gonna
go
over
all
the
document
together
with
grief
on
sunday
and
hopefully
we
might
be
able
to
review
it
all
and
and
from
there
we'll
love
a
lot
of
lawrence
and
and
and
anya
at
least
to
give
it
a
read
and
and
bring
their
their
inputs.
A
So
that
would
be
the
first
or
the
first
and
second
iteration,
and
then,
if
we
want
to
give
it
to
coach
v
to
give
it
a
read
or
whatever
we
should
have
the
final
version
from
there.
D
Could
you
possibly
add
that
picture
into
this
document?
I
don't
know
if
it's
necessarily
going
to
make
the
final
cut,
but
the
picture
is
worth
a
thousand
more
which.
A
D
And
we'll
we'll
make
some
tweaks
to
this
picture
too,
when,
when
on
sunday.
B
A
Just
change
it
just
change
it.
Accepting.
D
D
A
D
Well,
so
I
didn't
change
it.
He
just.
D
D
A
It's
on
the
on
the
same
agenda:
there's
a
link
to
the
original
argon
document;
okay,
cool.
D
A
A
According
to
the
top
of
the
hour
here,
so
I
think
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
stop
here
for
today
to
send
me
a
note
grief,
so
we
can
arrange
the
best
time
on
sunday.