►
From YouTube: W5 Parameters WG: Reading paramms for the test hatch and playing with our the new tool!
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - How should we decide witch hatch parameter we use?
23:00 - Things we wanna accomplish this call
24:40 - Turn the spec and reverse engineering
25:33 - Reading coding on an cool way!
39:44 - YGG and Sem tool for playing with IH rate
46:30 - Closing round and feedback
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Told
them
what
the
opening
question
was.
So
I
think
we
get
started
with
that.
But
the
big
question
is:
how
should
we
decide
which?
How
hashed
out
parameters
so
when
for
deciding
the
commons
upgrade
like
moving
to
the
abc
and
conviction
voting
parameters,
we'll
have
a
doubt
and
that
dow
will
have
people
who
put
skin
in
the
game
and
they
have
tec
tokens
from
impact
hours
and
from
putting
money
in
depositing
money
into
the
hatch,
and
they
will
be
the
ones
to
decide
which
parameters
we
use?
A
That's
just
how
it
will
be,
but
we
don't
have
a
dow.
Yet
right
we
have
a
few
different
metrics.
We
have
c-stack
tokens,
those
are
the
people
who
can
become
hatchers
and
everyone
who
has
impact
hours
has
c-stack
tokens.
We
have
impact
hours
and
those
are
people
who
get
free
tokens
and
then
we
also
have
like
individual
perspectives
right
one
person,
one
vote:
those
are
all
three
options.
A
A
A
B
I
I
don't
know
if
it's
the
best
way
to
move
forward,
but
I
want
to
give
I
got.
I
want
to
give
you
my
opinion,
all
right,
there's
there's
to
me,
there's
two
types
of
of
members:
if
you
want
to
call
them
people
who
is
really
involved
into
the
tech
development
and
they
don't
not
just
detect
developers
but
other
people
that's
been
around
and
understands
quite
well
the
parameters
and
people
who
either
they
wanna-
they
don't
wanna,
get
involved
into
that
or
they
don't
understand
them
or
both
to
me.
B
You
know,
and
and
why
do
we
choose
this
scenario-
a
little
explanation
of
why
and
then
let
people
decide
which
one
they
feel
more
comfortable,
and
we
can
do
that
on
one-on-one
voting,
probably
it's
probably
the
most
reasonable.
Since
we
are
all
involved
here.
I
don't
think
we
should
go
on
on
an
amount
of
I
don't
know
impact
hours
or
csga
tokens
or
or
any
other
any
other
parameter
like
that.
A
Let
me
just
repeat
what
I
heard
so
have
a
council
of
people
who
are
like
qualified
to
make
the
choice
and
then
have
them
pick
four
to
five
options,
and
they
would
pick
that
through
one
person,
one
vote
and
then
I
I'm
just
saying
that
and
then
everyone
else
would
vote
on
the
forum
for
which
one
of
those
four
or
five
choices
to
one
person.
One
vote.
B
That
right
right,
some
something
like
that,
so
it
so
it's
much
easier
for
those
who
don't
really
understand
all
the
parameters
to
get
involved
and
to
decide
and
choose,
which
is
what
I
think
it's
what
we
all
want.
We
want
everyone
to
give
their
opinion,
but
if
it's
something
really
tough
for
them
to
understand,
they
are
either
not
going
to
do
it
or
they
will
just
you
know,
put
some
checks
there
without
really
getting
involved
in
the
process
of
understanding
what
those
mean.
C
E
D
After
that,
too,
I
don't
I
don't
like
c-stack
voting.
I
I
I
think
you
just
end
up
with
more
of
a
technocracy.
I
think
we'd
end
up
with
the
council
just
deciding
everything
all
the
time,
then
really.
I
don't
really
think
impact
hours
should
have
anything
to
do
with
it
either.
I
think
it
would
we
again
more
people
are
going
to
have
a
bigger
impact
than
others,
and
then
their
vote
matters
more
and
that's
shouldn't
be
like
that
either
really
yeah,
I'm
I'm
pretty
much
just
the
same
as
santi.
E
E
Held
based
on
the
advice
process
and
adding
at
least
a
percentage
of
representatives
that
are
not
necessarily
people
that
understand
a
lot
the
parameters,
but
people
that
would
be
impacted
by
them
so
just
to
have
a
other
opinions
waiting
in
and
then
that
this
console
would
come
up
with
alternatives.
I
think
that's
a
great
idea.
E
E
F
Thanks,
libby
yeah.
I
also
think
what
santi
was
saying.
It
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
I
also
think
like
levy,
but
at
the
same
time
I'm
not
agree
that
it's
full
impact
hours.
I
like
more
deceased
ak
tokens,
since
it
represents
both
things
because
impact
towers,
for
example
like
you
and
greece,
don't
have
that
much
and
you
are
involved
in
here
like
from
the
whole
time
and
it
yeah.
I
think,
cystic
age
token
should
be
more
fire
and
it
should
represent
better
the
in
the
involved.
A
A
I
like
this
meme
of
no
technocracy
and
the
council,
even
if
olivia
stacks
it
with
soft
gov
and
and
the
stewards
team
or
whatever
still
feels
like
a
technocracy.
I
I
really
like
the
idea
that
anyone
can
propose
parameters.
Okay,
but
parameters
will
never
be
decided.
One
by
one
it'll
always
be
here
is
the
list
of
parameters,
and
I
know
it's
hard
for
me
to
explain
that
and
get
that
across
not
doing
the
best
job,
but
it
will
always
be.
These
are
all
of
the
parameters.
No
one
will
ever
say
hey.
A
We
should
have
a
hatchman
goal
of
this
and
that
have
any
relevance
to
anything.
A
proposed
set
of
parameters
is
all
that
will
matter,
because
that's
the
only
way
this
can
work
in
my
opinion
and
what
I
would
like
to
see
is
kind
of
a
mix.
I'd
like
to
see
people
propose
parameters
through
one
individual
who
so
that
the
people
who
are
proposing
the
parameters
are
not
being
politically.
The
people
who
are
voting
are
politically
biased.
Oh
zargham
proposes.
A
Right
so
I'd
like
to
see
them
anonymously
proposed
and
then
there'd
be
a
bunch
of
sets
of
parameters.
Those
sets
of
parameters
would
be
run
through
the
same
metrics,
so
we
could
see
what
happens
if
we
raise
a
million
dollars.
What
happens
if
we
raise
a
hundred
thousand?
Oh
if
we
raise
a
hundred
thousand.
All
of
these
proposals
fail,
except
for
this
one,
which
has
a
min
goal
of
ninety
thousand,
and
this
is
how
many
impact
hours
you
get
this.
How
many?
What
happens
if
we
raise?
You
know
two
million
dollars.
A
You
know
having
all
these
scenarios
and
also
having
other
metrics
that
are
important
like
how
long
will
the
hatch
be
from
hatch
to,
like
you
know,
voting
on
the
commons
upgrade
all
of
these
important
pro
metrics
being
so
that
people
have
feel
like
they
can
just
quickly
look
and
make
a
decision
from
their
own
gut
about
which
scenarios
they
like
and
then
now.
This
is
the
crazy
part.
A
I
would
like
thirty,
three
percent
one
person,
one
vote.
Thirty
three
percent
one
impact
hour:
one
vote:
thirty,
three
percent
c
stack
one
one
token
one
vote
and
I
use
ranked
choice
voting.
So
it's
very
complicated,
but
that's
and
that's
why
and
it's
there's
no
chance
in
hell.
That's
what's
gonna
happen,
but
that's
my
idea.
Okay,
craig
welcome
to
the
party
right,
the
the
question.
The
question
is:
how
should
we
decide
which
hatched
out
parameters
we.
G
G
A
A
B
Right
griff,
I
I
I
I
I
also
like
your
option.
Your
idea,
your
proposal,
but
I
try
to
put
myself
in
in
the
skin
of
someone
who
doesn't
really
understand
the
parameters
and
doesn't
really
want
to
hassle
through
going
through
the
understanding
he
wants
to
get
involved,
but
it's
tough
for
them
to
spend
the
time
to
try
to
understand
them.
Okay.
B
A
I
agree,
I
think
the
voting
has
to
be
open
if
it's
one
person
one
vote,
because
we
don't
have
really
good
civil
protection,
so
we
have
to
be
able
to
say
no,
it's
a
public
voting
and
hey
look
at
all
these
bots
or,
like
I've,
never
heard
of
any
of
these
people.
They
don't
really
count
they're,
not
counting
the
people
that,
unless
you
hey,
who
are
you
say,
say
who
you
are.
I
challenge
your
vote.
A
You
know
like
who
the
hell
are
you
or
maybe
they
have
to
have
c-stack
tokens
to
vote
at
all
and
that
that
might
be.
That
might
be
a
requirement
that
would
be
our
civil
protection
either
way.
I
I
want
to
just
respond
to
that
and
then
give
tonga
a
chance,
but
we
need
to
for
this
approach
to
work.
We
need
to
make
and
I'm
getting
ygg
all
set
up
to
make
like
really
easy
metrics,
where,
when
people
propose
parameters,
they
propose
parameters,
but
that's
not
what
people
are
voting
on.
A
People
are
not
voting
on
these
numbers.
They're
voting
on
the
metrics
they're,
looking
at
like
important
metrics
that
are
called
out
for
each
parameter
proposal.
So
that
there
should
be
a
a
a
friendly
face,
you
know
that
people
can
be
like
okay,
so
this
is
the
impact
hour
rate
if
we
raise
five
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Okay,
that
makes
sense,
and
if
we
raise
a
million
dollar,
you
know.
Okay,
these
are
the
different
impact
rates
based
on
how
much
we
raise
okay.
This
is
the
main
goal
that
we
have
to
raise.
Otherwise
it
fails.
A
A
E
So
if,
if
it's
in
the
structure
of
the
console
to
involve
people
that
are
maybe
not
so
informed
but
to
like
really
hear
their
opinion
like
in
in
an
advice
process
type
of
way,
but
then
we
are
giving
a
chance
for
people
to
like
we're,
creating
a
safe
space
for
people
to
be
involved
and
for
their
opinions
to
be
weighted.
On
like
this
consensus
that
would
arise
from
this
group
of
people
and
then
having
different
options.
Maybe
we
could
create
metrics
for
how
these
options
like
what
points?
A
So
what
I'll
say
to
that
is
to
propose
parameters?
You
can
copy
paste,
someone
else's
proposal
and
change.
One
number
like
it
should
be.
There
will
be
like
a
default
proposal
that
we
make
and
then
yeah
and
then
different
people
will
propose
different
proposals
through
one
person
anonymously
and
then
maybe
someone's
like.
I
really
like
this
proposal,
but
why
is
the
max
school?
A
million
dollar
main
goal
a
million
dollars.
I
don't
want
that
risk
I'll.
Just
change
that
to
100k
I
like
that
proposal.
A
B
A
Well,
we'll
see
if
we
can
make
it
easy,
definitely
can't
can't
promise,
but
that's
the
dream,
but
I
like
this.
I
do
like
the
council
backup
if
we
can't
make
it
easy.
If
we
fail
at
our
job
and
it's
you
know
the
we
gotta
have
a
plan
b
and
a
little
bit
of
tech
sprinkling
a
little
technocracy
or
like
hierarchical
process.
I
mean
this
is
pretty
common
right.
You
have
a
group
of
people
cured,
I
mean
we
even
did
it
with
the
dow
we
had
curators
right,
though
not
anyone
can
just
propose.
A
B
A
A
The
main
one
is
to
go
through
this
horribly
scary,
difficult
to
understand
code
that
basically
picks
all
of
our
parameters,
and
just
one
by
one,
go
through
this
thing
to
demystify
it,
because
it's
really
not
that
scary,
it's
just
written
in
the
wrong
font.
That
scares
people
other
thing,
but
before
we
do
that,
I
want
to
mention
this.
This
task.
No,
that's
not
it!
Well,
there
is
a
goal.
What
we
need
to
do
is
turn
this
scary
document
into
a
google
doc
that
that
fits
the
aragon
standard
for
specifying
dials.
A
A
So
by
following
that
spec
and
including
all
of
these
parameters
in
it,
we
might
uncover
a
few
parameters
that
sam
is
hiding
from
us.
That
evil
evil
man,
no
I'm
just
kidding,
obviously,
but
it
might.
He
might
just
forget
that
it's
important
to
note
that
you
know
there's
this
one
magic
like
filter
or
something
that's
a
smart
contract
over
here.
Things
like
that
yeah.
So
that's
going
to
be
the
task
of
this
of
this
next,
like
over
christmas
break
for
the
tec.
A
A
A
Well,
that
probably
didn't
make
any
sense.
I
was
showing
all
sorts
of
cool
screens
go
through
the
the
te
commons
template
and
demystify
it.
So,
let's
just
start
at
the
top.
This
by
the
way
is
what
creates
our
down
the
underlying
code
base
is
there,
but
this
is
what
makes
it
the
tec
so
there's
some
random
stuff
that
we
really
don't
have
to
worry
about
right,
like
the
name
which
network
is
it
on?
A
What's
the
dow
id,
these
are
things
that
really,
you
know,
are
more
like
foundational
level
things
back-end
code
stuff
like
which
network
is
it
on?
You
know
that
determines
the
block
time
and
these
other
these
other
things
the
hatch
template
address.
This
is
like,
basically,
that,
where
the
hatch
code
base
is
being
copied
from
online
on
the
chain
and
then
there's
some
constants,
everything
in
solidity
is
in
seconds
so
an
hour.
It
means
this
many
seconds.
A
day
means
this
many
seconds.
A
100
of
a
token
in
solidity,
is
one
to
the
ea
team,
because
the
decimals
like,
on
one
token
so
percents
percents,
end
up
being
so
that
we
don't
have
rounding
errors.
We
just
use
a
very
large
number
of
percent.
Instead
of
a
hundred
we
use
one
with
eighteen,
zeros
and
then
yeah.
I
don't
even
think
we
use
fundraising
hundred
percent
anymore
parts
per
million
that
these
things
are
for
the
augmented
bonding
curve
and
we'll
probably
scrape
them
out
contributors
pros
process
per
transaction.
A
No,
no,
we
do
the
people
who
contribute
to
the
hatch.
They
get
tc
tokens,
but
the
impact
hours
people
they
they
get
the
impact,
the
tc
tokens
for
those
impact
hours
at
the
very
end,
and
we
can
only
send
so
many
tokens
in
one
block.
So
this
says
that
you
can
only
puts
a
limit
of
10
people
that
can
be
processed
in
per
transaction.
Just
to
avoid
getting
stuck.
It's
kind
of
us
safe
block
time
is
dependent
on
the
network.
For
us,
it's
five
seconds
on
x
die
collateral
token.
A
A
We
this
defines
the
name
and
this
token
symbol.
Then
there's
score
token.
So
this
is
like
which
token
is
your
membership
score,
and
for
us
it's
the
c
stack
token.
So
it
reads
the
c
stack
token
balance
to
see
how
many
dot
wrapped
x
die.
You
can
put
in
the
decimals
for
one
for
c
stack
are
zero,
so
like
there's,
no,
you
can
only
have
you
can't
have
a
fraction
of
a
c
stack
token.
A
So
that's
just
this
is
just
a
helper
hatch.
Oracle
ratio
0.005.
So
this
says
that
if
you
have
one
c
stack
token,
you
can
put
in
point
zero,
zero,
five
raptex
diet.
To
put
that
in
terms
we
can
understand
to
send
one
raftex
die
to
this
contract.
You
need
to
have
200
c-stack
tokens,
and
that's
because
this
is
a
test.
Obviously
we
will
make
that
much
lower.
We
don't
want
people
to
send
too
much
money
to
this
contract.
That's
why
this
is
so
high.
A
This
is
the
requirements
for
voting
for
the
upgrade,
so
sixty
percent
support
required
two
percent
quorum
three
days
of
like
of
voting,
we're
just
doing
going
to
do
a
quick
vote
for
the
test,
eight
hours
of
buffer
24
hours
of
block
time,
blah
blah
blah,
and
maybe
we
should
make
this
seven
days
for
our
test.
I
don't
know
yeah-
is
that.
A
A
This
is
being
recorded
and
maybe,
if
someone
wants
to
read
this,
you
know,
then
you
know
this.
This
can
be
a
how-to
video,
okay,
so
yeah
photo
duration
blocks
buffer
blocks,
execution
delay
blocks,
there's
blog
posts
for
those.
Thank
you
jake
for
making
all
those
things
happen
and
for
everyone
who
wrote
them
and
then
the
most
important
thing
is
the
tollgate
fee,
which
is
how
much
money
does
it
take
to
propose
a
vote
to
the
demo
or
not?
A
Sorry,
it's
not
the
most
important,
but
it's
more
important
than
execution,
delay
and
buffer
blocks.
Those
are
just
like
random
delays,
but
the
total
gate
fee
so
for
someone
to
propose
to
upgrade
to
the
conference.
They'll
have
to
spend
three
round
decks
tonight
on
that
and
then
hatch
to
mingle.
So
this
is
five.
How
many
collateral
tokens
are
required
to
hatch?
So
this
will
be.
Our
hatch
will
fail
if
we
don't
raise
five
right
right.
A
I
hope
we
can
do
good
guys
and
then,
and
one
rap
decks
die
is
one
time.
So
if
we
don't
get
five
bucks,
we're
screwed,
we
don't
deserve
it.
If
we
don't
get
five
bucks
hatch
mixed
mexico,
this
is
basically
the
we
cannot
raise
more
than
a
thousand
x.
I
even
though,
that
there
is
enough
c
stack
tokens
to
send
four
thousand
raptor
x,
divided
by
this
contract.
A
The
hatch
exchange
rate
is
really
small.
This
means
that
if
someone
donates
or
if
someone
deposits
one
raft
x
die
to
this
contract,
they
get
like
a
million
tokens
or
something
it's
kind
of
fun
and
bestiancliff
investing
complete
period.
These
are
these
are
interesting,
so
there's
actually
no,
we
we're
basically
leaving
these
in,
but
during
the
hatch
period,
people
are
not
allowed
to
withdraw
their
funds,
so
people
will
get
c
stack
tokens,
but
then
they
can't
get
their
money
back
out
until
after
the
hatch
period.
A
So
what
and
then,
after
that
hatch
period,
there
should
be
all
the
all
of
the
tec.
Tokens
will
have
been
issued
for
impact
hours,
so
they
will
effectively
be
losing
money
for
the
impact.
The
cultural
bill
tribute
the
impact
hour
tribute,
I
don't
know
whatever
we
want
to
call
it
investing
complete
period,
so
yeah
there's
a
cliff
of
one
second
and
then
the
vesting
lasts
one
second,
basically
no
vesting,
and
there
will
be
vesting
when
we
do
the
commons
upgrade,
but
that's
something
else.
E
A
A
A
Is
the
hatch
tribute
so
in
this
test
hatch
we
have
a
five
percent
non-refundable
donation
to
the
te
commons
funding
pool
and
we
have
the
cultural
build
tribute
so
they're,
both
in
there
and
then
open
date.
Just
says
what
time
when
the
hatch
opens
like
upon
deploying
this
contract,
can
people
send
money
right
away?
Yes,.
E
A
B
E
A
B
B
A
Wrong,
if
I
maybe
we
can
ask
them
yeah,
I
I'm
still
having
trouble
understanding
how
that's
different
than
the
hatch
tribute
and
this
one,
but
that's
okay.
I
we
will
need
to
just
ask
them,
but
now
let's
go
to
impact
hours
so
impact
our
csv.
There
is
going
to
be
a
list
of
addresses
and
number
of
impact
hours
and
that
will
be
there
and
then
impact
our
decimals.
This
is
just
how
many
decimals
do
we
use
for
calculating
the
impact
hours?
It's
it's
a!
It's
really,
not
important.
It's
the
precision
of
impact
hours.
A
And
then-
or
maybe
it's
five-
maybe
it
doesn't
round
and
then
max
impact
our
rate
and
expected
raise
per
impact
hours,
so
this
is
kind
of
wild
and
I
want
to
show
I
want
to
go
a
little
deeper
on
this,
so
I
don't
know
how
many
of
you
guys
have
played
with
this,
but
it's
awesome.
This
is
something
that
ygg
and
sun
put
together
and
basically
it's
a
it's
a
tool
for
deciding
for
playing
with
impact
hour
rate.
A
How
many,
how
at
what?
How
much
money
do
we
raise
divided
by
the
total
number
of
impact
hours
for
the
person
for
everybody
to
get
half
of
the
max
rate?
So,
let's
so
here,
the
max
impact
hour
rate
is
one
penny
right
and
so
m
determines
how
how
much
money
we
have
to
raise
in
total,
divided
by
the
total
number
of
impact
hours.
That's!
What
m
is
the
how
much
money
we
have
to
raise
total
divided
by
impact
hours
to
get
half
of
this
max
rate.
A
A
A
A
A
D
You
know
it
kind
of
also
makes
me
think
about
like
that
whole
making
the
parameters
organic.
You
know,
because
that's
what
you're
talking
about
with
ygg,
making
something
more
visual,
I
I
just.
We
really
need
to
explain
this
in
in
the
you
know,
you
did
a
good
job
but
explain
it
in
more
layman's
terms.
D
I
guess
maybe
more
of
us
need
to
really
understand
it,
because
this
is
really
cool,
because
seeing
it
and
being
able
to
then
describe
something
like
this
to
people
about
everything
you
know
is
is
huge
because
it
would
solve
so
many
problems
that
we
wouldn't
even
have
to
deal
with,
like
simmons,
tim
and
ygg
doing.
This
is
awesome.
A
C
A
A
F
F
A
A
The
max
goal
is
one
of
them
that
I
expect
many
people
to
set
to
be
irrelevant,
but
at
the
same
time
there
was
this
one
time
in
my
life
where
we
expected
to
raise
just
a
little
bit
of
money
and
then
ended
up
raising
14
of
all
ether
in
existence
and
it
kind
of
became
a
big
problem.
So
like
it's
like
having
a
having
a
max
at
least
as
an
option
is
like
I
don't
know
I
like
it.
I
like
it.
B
B
A
A
A
So,
for
the
token
engineering,
commons,
hatch,
dow
there's
really
only
one
decision
that
has
to
be
made,
and
that
is
upgrading
to
the
comments
and
picking
the
parameters
for
for
the
augmented,
bonding
curve
and
conviction
voting
and
then
for
those
parameters.
They
will
that
in
that,
that
parameter
set
is
going
to
be
really
crazy.
A
To
vote
on
to
to
do
anything,
there's
just
like
the
one
decision
which
is
which
commons
do
we
upgrade
to
this
commons
or
not,
and
everybody
in
and
the
big
thing
here
is
that
everybody
in
the
hashtag
they
can
redeem
their
token
for
the
die
for
die.
That's
in
there,
so
everyone
can
leave
any
individual
that
wants
to
can
leave
if
they
don't
like
the
decision
unless
they
vote
yes
on
it,
if
they
vote.
Yes,.
A
They
will
leave
the
hats
tribute
and
they
will
be
diluted
in
their
tec
token
holdings
by
the
by
the
impact
hours
people
so
effectively.
If,
let's
say
in
this
test
hatched-
and
I'm
sure
people
will
do
it,
it'll
be
fun,
let's
say
that
we
raise
35
wrapped
x,
die
wow,
look
at
how
fast
that
changes.
Oh
it's
because
I
changed
this.
A
So
this
is
one
two.
I
think
yes,
okay,
so
these
are
the
parameters
right
right
now
that
seminar
decided
because
screw
you
guys.
This
is
technocracy
and
then
we
have.
If
we
raise
30
rap
decks
die,
then
everybody
will
get
half
a
penny
per
impact
hour
and
the
cultural
build
tribute
will
effectively
be
41
percent
for
impact
hours
and
5.
A
If
you
decide
that
you
don't
like
the
idea,
if
we
raise
eighty
or
let's
see
if
I
can
find
a
round
number
here-
oh
yeah,
if
we
raise
95,
then
the
cultural
build
tribute
goes
down
to
20
percent
and
the
hatch
tribute
is
five
percent.
So
then,
if
you
put
in
one
wrap
decks
die
you'll
be
able
to
pull
out
75
cents.
A
B
D
Hey
I
I
got
something
I
want
to
bring
up.
I
will
say
that
this
whole
impact
out
like
right
here
and
what
we're
talking
about
and
and
making
this
really
clear
and
easy
to
understand,
is
giant
for
onboarding,
because
most
people
are
going
to
get
really
attracted
to
impact,
and
if
we
make
this
really
clear
and
and
they
can
see
where
they
can
benefit,
but
they
have
to
join
the
community
and
then
we
pretty
much
direct
them
to
gravity
and
soft
gov.
D
A
A
Our
team
is
impact
hours.
This
is
the
percentage
that
go
to
them
and
the
percentage
is
dependent
on
how
much
we
raise
if
we
raise
a
lot.
Less
goes
to
the
team
and
most
more
goes
to
the
people
who
are
contributing
money
because
they're
contributing
more
right
and
and
that
that
matches
what
it
should
be
right.
If
the,
if
not
very
many
people,
contribute
money,
then
there
you
know
there
was
a
larger
percentage
of
the
sweat
equity
that
put
this
together.
A
They
should
be
rewarded
more
and
but
they
get
rewarded
less
in
dollar
amount,
but
more
and
percentage-wise
and
as
people
contribute
lot
a
lot
more
money.
Well,
that's
going
to
have
a
huge
impact,
so
we
get
less
percentage-wise
but
at
the
same
time
impact
our
people
get
more
money.
So
it
it's
like
a
win.
It's
a
very
much
a
win-win
situation
where
I
feel
like
has
a
good
model
that
people
will
like.
Instead
of
just
the
team
saying
yeah,
we
get
30
of
the
tokens
because
it's
a
nice
round
number.