►
Description
The Parameters Working Group deployed the dashboard for the Hatch and is now working on the dashboard for the Commons Upgrade. The goal is to get the community involved with as many technical decisions as possible to get a healthy TE Commons off the ground!
We gather every Wednesday at 10pm CET.
Steward: Griff
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
B
Sorry
I
was
muted
yeah.
I'd
love
to
this
call
know
a
bit
more
about
what's
happening
with
gardens.
I
noticed
there's
some
people
here.
Maybe
we
could
talk
about
forum
posts
and
maybe
about
the
summary
for
the
dashboard
spec.
Apart
from
that
love
to
hear
all
your
updates
I'll
give
it
to
nate.
C
Yep,
my
intentions
are
a
forum
post
forum
post
forum
post
just
getting
update
on
everybody
where
to
see
where
they're
at,
if
you've
heard
anything
about
some
of
the
posts
and
no
distractions
at
the
moment,
doing
doing
real
good
so
I'll
pass
the
vtor.
D
E
Yeah
and
the
last
one
yeah,
my
intentions
is
see
the
updates
and
yeah
see
where
I
can
support
and
maybe
writing
some
from
post
with
nate
no
distractions
yeah
back
to
you
guys.
B
C
Yep
everything's,
looking
good,
I
was
gonna,
have
a
set
of
time
tomorrow.
If
anybody
has
time
to
actually
go
for
a
review,
I
was
gonna
give
another
day
to
manu.
I
guess
either
there's
a
couple:
a
couple
of
the
forum
posts,
the
tokenthal
and
the
price
floor
that
I
don't
know
if
he's
got
it
done
or
if
he
just
hasn't
linked
it
yet
so
just
waiting
on
updates
on
that
some
of
the
other
ones
look
really
good.
Are
we
going
to
be
linking
these
to
the
the
config
dashboard.
C
A
C
Okay,
okay
and
did
you
is
anybody
working
on
the
the
default
brands,
the?
I
know
you
had
a
default
post
that
you
were
working
on.
I
just
don't
have
the
link
for
it
and
then
the
disputable
conviction
voting.
F
A
A
Wow,
that's
great
so
then
they're
they're
already
on
the
forum
right.
We
just
need
to
review
them.
C
That
is
correct.
I
don't
yeah
I've
been
found.
I
need
to
find
the
disputable
conviction,
voting
params,
one
of
them
that
we
we
linked
from
the
old
forum
post,
that
we
just
kind
of
re-edited
and
renamed.
So
I
hope
that's,
okay.
I
I
don't
see
any
problem
with
it,
except
for
some
of
the
responses
to
it
are
a
little
bit
misaligned.
So,
but
it's
not
a
big
deal
either
way.
F
I
was
thinking,
maybe
we
want
to
actually
just
like
make
new
posts
with
the
new
names
and
then
have
them
link
back
to
the
old
post,
because
mitch
made
a
good
point
of
like
maybe
old
articles
are
going
to
be
linking
back
to
those
posts
and
it's
like
more
relevant
to
call
it
like
beta
or
max
ratio
instead
of
relative
spending
limit
or
these
things
that
we're
changing
it
to
so
I
was
working
on
the
well.
I
was
working
on
that
one
and
I
can
do
the
other
ones
for
just
fetal
addiction
voting.
F
B
C
Yeah,
are
you
talking
about
the
ones
that
jake
and,
like
tim,
did
back
in
january
for
the
conviction,
voting
and
stuff
like
that
yeah?
I
don't
think
much
has
changed,
but
there
might
be
a
little
bit
of
like
terminology
and
the
responses
kind
of
are
misleading.
Sometimes,
but
I
mean
it's
up
to
you
guys
whether
you
want
to
create
a
new
post
and
then
link
it
back.
F
And
I
think
the
usefulness
of
that
is
that
we
could
also
say
like
how
to
choose
good
params
for
the
dashboard,
because
this
is
sort
of
like
the
purpose
of
a
lot
of
these
posts
so
that
when
the
old
ones
were
written,
they
were
like
to
explain
the
theory
for
some
other
specific
purpose.
So
it's
like
the
new
post
will
have
the
same
general
content,
but
like
with
a
little
bit
of
like
guidance
and
a
suggested
range.
That's
seemingly
the
usefulness.
C
Oh
yeah
visuals
would
be
really
awesome
because
some
of
these
would
be
you
know,
there's
so
much
like
it's
easily
more
easily
explained
when
I
have
a
visual
for
it.
So
to
I,
don't
have
the
links
for
the
actual
dashboard
that
you're
working
on
right
now.
Is
there
any
way
I
can
get
that.
A
F
F
I
don't
know
if
that's
what's
happening
in
this
call,
but
I
see
someone
have
people
and
I
think
that's
why
we're
here
and
my
distractions,
I'm
just
so
exhausted,
had
such
a
long
day
yesterday,
but
it's
cool,
I'm
gonna
be
like
really
here
for
this
hour
and
then
I'll
be
distracted
again
later
and
I
guess
I'll
pass
it
to
sasha.
If
you
just
don't
do.
H
Yeah
hi,
I'm
just
here.
I
guess,
because
I
griff
sent
me
the
wonderful
resources
you've
been
working
on
and
just
to
make
sure
we're
syncing
with
the
names.
I
guess
on
behalf
of
one
hive,
I
must
say
initial
initial
impressions
is
it
I
like
I,
I
like
the
way
it's
going
and
it's
much
clearer,
already
yeah,
so
just
here
to
listen
in
and
and
and
voice.
My
opinion
on
on
that
that
sort
of
yeah
on
those
things.
I
Just
my
intention
is
to
get
up
to
speed
with
the
params
status,
I
suppose,
and
the
distractions
are
just
whatever
notifications
come
through,
but
I
disabled
my
internet
on
my
phone,
so
I
can
fully
be
in
thanks.
A
C
Okay,
you're
cutting
it
out
again.
A
B
A
Cool
and
then
token
freeze
period
token,
thaw
period
is
that
what
we're
talking.
A
Cool
okay,
so
now
I
as
long
as
those
are
all
cool-
and
I
don't
see
anyone
like
throwing
up
objections-
we
can
get
into
stuff
that
that
sasha
is
really
here
to
to
dive
into
so,
instead
of
half-life,
not
not
conviction
rate,
what
are
we
calling?
It.
A
D
H
Just
to
clarify
here
is
it
the
the
lower
the
half-life
the
faster
the
rate?
The
conviction
grows
right.
H
J
D
A
A
D
The
number
of
days
we
can
reach
80
percent,
I
think,
probably
like
I
think
it's
clear
there,
but
like
half
life,
not
sure,
because
if
you
say
like
one
divided
by
half-life,
it
doesn't
say
much
as
well.
H
As
long
as
like
higher
values
mean
the
conviction
grows
faster,
I
think
that's.
Okay,
ideally
like
it'd,
be
awesome.
If
there
was
some
sort
of
mapping
between
that
and
and
the
equations
themselves
to
have
some
sort
of
intuition,
but
I'm
not.
I
don't
feel
especially
strongly
about
that.
I
A
A
But
for
for
when
people
are
actually
choosing
it,
they'll
see
a
graph
like
this
that
will
end
up
showing
them.
Oh
yeah,
eighty
percent
conviction
will
take
30
days
and
50
conviction
will
take
15..
You
know
and
they'll
see,
they'll
see
the
percent
the
number
of
days
it
takes
to
reach
max
con.
H
I
see
so
actually
what
you're
just
doing
is
essentially
just
like
as
you're
as
you're
moving
the
slider
you're,
actually
decreasing
the
half
life,
that's
kind
of
it's
just
the
opposite
right:
okay,
yeah.
That
makes
sense.
A
Yeah
exactly-
and
you
know
conviction
itself
is
such
a
shitty
idea
like
token
seconds.
Is
the
units
of
conviction
like
how
do
you
visualize
that
you
know,
like
you,
can't
think
of
second
in
your
mind,
so
we
kind
of
break
everything
up
into
plots
like
this,
like
a
two,
a
two
dimensional
plot,
where
time
is
on
one
thing
and
then
something
else
is
exist
and
then
you
can
kind
of
understand
what
the
hell
is.
A
So
cool,
if
you're
down
with
conviction
growth,
then
we
can,
we
can
move
on
and
and
go
towards
relatives
yeah.
H
No
no
yeah,
no
just
saying
I
had
to
look
at
the
graphs
and
they're
really
intuitive,
so
great
great
work
on
this
yeah.
We
need
something
like
that.
A
Validation,
it
feels
so
good.
Okay,
instead
of
max
ratio,
we're
calling
it
relative
spending.
H
H
H
H
Yeah
yeah,
perhaps
that's
worth
doing,
but
I
like
the
spending
part
because
it's
sort
of
like
a
piggy
bank
sort
of
right.
It
gives
you
the
piggy
bank
feeling
of
a
common
resource.
So
but
I
agree
with
you:
maybe
the
relative
isn't
needed,
but
yeah
that
would
be.
That
would
just
be
the
thing
to
think
to
think
on
then,
but
I
like
it.
A
Cool
making
an
impact-
okay,
great,
let's
then
next
one
is
minimum
conviction.
Instead
of
min
threshold,
we
call
it
minimum
conviction.
This
one
is
probably
this
one's
a
little
crazy.
A
A
I
if
the
proposal
is
asking
for
one
penny
right,
so
you
can
kind
of
think
of
it
as
the
minimum
amount
requested
and
then
first
is
the
number
of
days
so
like
to
pass
it
in
the
first.
Second,
it
will
never
happen,
but
then
you
know
after
one
day
yeah.
If
all
the
tokens
are
voting
on
it
then
sure
you
know
but
to
pass
it
in
two
weeks.
Oh
yeah,
it
only
requires
21
of
the
token
to
pass
it
in
six
months.
A
And
again,
it'll
be
like
the
other
one,
where
there's
just
a
slider
and
we'll
have
a
number
it'll
be
an
output,
and
it
probably
won't
make
any
sense
because
the
units
will
be
stupid
but
hey
they
they're
not
going
to
be
looking
for
our
use
case.
They're
not
going
to
be
looking
at
the
numbers.
They're
just
going
to
be
like
getting
this
data
right
and
changing
the
graph.
H
Yeah
that
that
makes
sense
and
the
graph
what,
for
you
guys,
will
the
graph
be
part
of
like
the
proposal
process
itself?
How
does
before
someone
creates
a
proposal
they
will
be
able
to
to
play
around
with
this
or
how
does
it
work.
B
A
That
really
describes,
like
you
know,
okay,
to
pass
a
proposal.
You
know
yeah
to
pass
a
proposal
in
two
weeks.
You
know
that's
like,
depending
on
how
much
of
the
total
funds
you're
asking
for
this
is
what
the
chart
would
look
like.
B
A
H
A
K
A
Yeah,
I
didn't
think
anyone
had
the
courage
to
say
anything
in
this
larger
group
of
people
so
good,
let's
move
on
disputable
voting,
so
I
think
these
are
pretty
much
we're
just
gonna
go
with
what
was
what
one
hive
already
had.
I
don't
think
we're.
I
don't
think
any
of
these
are
too
confusing
mitch.
Did
you
have
any
of
these
that
we
changed
already.
H
No,
I
I
haven't
really
got
into
that
part
yet,
but
there's
not
no.
I
not
immediate.
There
isn't
anything
that
comes
to
mind
as
being
obviously
very
difficult
to
graph
them
and
I
don't
have
any
better
ideas,
so
I
don't
think
so.
H
A
Okay,
now
there
there
are
some.
Indeed,
we
have
we're
splitting
ours
up
into
an
advanced
area
and
like
like
the
main
area
and
then
we're
taking
all
these
parameters
that
no
one
really
needs
to
worry
about
and
hiding
them
in
an
advanced
area.
But
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
have
the
same
names
for
them
min
effective
supply.
A
A
So
when,
when
you
launch
conviction
voting,
if
someone
comes
in
and
just
puts
the
first
hundred
tokens,
they
don't
have
a
hundred
percent
of
the
voting
power
there's
like
kind
of
a
quorum
like
a
fake,
effective
supply
to
start
with.
So
maybe
it's
like
you
know,
10
000
tokens
or
something.
H
Yeah,
yes,
like
the
actual
the
minimum
number
that's
used
to
then
calculate
the
things
like
the
min
threshold
right
like
if
you
have
less
than
that,
then
you
default
to
using
that
number
right.
Okay,
exactly
yeah!
H
I
don't
know
it's
like
it's,
not
an
intuitive,
it's
like
long-winded
and
I'm
sure
there's
a
better
name,
but
I
don't
know
I'm
not.
I
can't
think
of
one
on
the
top
of
my
head,
but
I
don't
know
I
mean
I
mean
if
we
were
to.
A
B
H
H
Better
yeah,
I'm
not
sure
I
think
it's
slightly
better,
but
I
think
we
can
do
even
better.
I
mean
like
I
think,
how
how
how
long
do
like
if
we
want
to
think
of
a
better
name.
How
long
do
we
have
before
it
creates
a
problem
for
you
guys.
A
A
I
mean
because
we're
not
diving
deep
to
explain
what
it
is,
not
the
end
of
the
world.
We
control
f1
forum.
Maybe
it
takes
someone
20
minutes
to
change
it
all.
At
least
we
won't
change
a
lot
of
graphics
and
a
lot
of
you
know
we
won't
have
been
explaining
it
yeah
put
it
in
people's
minds
so
much
that
it'll
be
okay,.
A
A
Great
request
token,
we
haven't
talked
about
this,
but
this
is
basically
like
if
you
want
to
ask
for
a
number
of
x
die
in
in
tec
tokens.
You
say
you
make
a
proposal,
that's
like
hey,
I
need
twenty
thousand
dollars.
Dollar
x
die
worth
of
tec
or
something
like
that.
I
think
it
matters
for
various
things.
It's
basically
the
base
unit
token,
and
we
haven't
talked
about
this
naming
at
all,
but
I
it's
used
all
over
the
place.
I
don't.
H
It's
okay,
so
to
correct
me
if
I
I'm
just
gonna
what
you're
saying
is
when,
when
someone
is
either
making
a
proposal
deposit
or
a
challenge
deposit
or
something
like
that,
and
they
don't
have
the
required
token,
they
can
click
on
something
within
the
interface
that
allows
them
to
request
the
correct
token
and
you're.
Calling
that
request
token
is
that
no.
A
It's
called
request
token
in
the
code,
but
it's
really
just
xdi.
A
A
A
But
when
you
make
a
proposal-
and
you
say
hey,
I
would
like
to
request
20
000
x
die
worth
of
give
token.
Then
then
it
will
that
the
request
token
is
that
is
that.
A
Okay,
I
see
the
name
is
horrible.
Okay,.
H
Yeah,
I
agree
with
that
right
so,
but
that
that
doesn't
affect
gardens
in
any
way
right.
That's
just
are
we
also
going
to
have
something
like
that.
A
H
You're
launching
yeah,
I
mean
they
they
can
choose,
they
have
to
call,
as
far
as
I
understand
they
call
an
update,
function
right
to
sort
of
recalibrate
in
terms
of
x,
die
or
us
dollars.
What
the
amount
needed
in
their
garden
token,
is
to
to
make
a
proposal
or
challenge
one
right,
but
for
us
that's
just
kind
of
like
an
update
function.
H
Got
it
I
see:
okay,
yeah,
I
think
it's
a
bad
name,
but
we
can
think
of
yeah,
let's,
let's
think
of
a
better.
H
H
A
A
F
H
Yeah,
I
saw
your
post
or
your
issue,
you
raised
aaron
and
I
I
agree
with
you
like
the
terms
that
you
you
chose
in
that
issue,
which
might
be
the
same
as
the
ones
here
we're
better,
and
I
think
we
should
go
with
that.
A
H
H
Yeah
I
mean
I'll
just
have
a
think
and
then
I'll
share
with
you
and
and
and
then
we'll
go
from
there.
Yeah
I'll,
try
and
share
with
you
something
by
this
weekend.
Yeah
I
gotta
rush
out,
but
thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
having
me.
A
Throw
the
discussion
in
the
garden
wizardry
channel
so
that
mitch
and
lauren.
H
A
What
a
relief
anyway,
I'm
just
so
happy
to
be
in
sync,
okay,
so
this
is
since
we're
here.
I
guess
I
just
want
to
dive
into
this
post
a
little
bit,
and
especially
since
sem
is
here
because
there's
the
one
blocker
I
have
for
publishing
it
is
these
last:
oh,
hey,
sam!
A
L
A
Okay,
yeah,
that's
cool!
It's
really
just
these
four
parameters
that
are
like
the
us,
adding
liquidity
to
some
honey
swap
pool
and
the
parameters
that
are
required
to
do
that,
and
I
think
we
were
saying
that
we
will
just
like
daotoshi
nakamoto
will
provide
the
collateral.
Is
that
correct.
L
L
I
guess
that
it,
it
has
the
most
the
most
sense.
The
vote
is
basically
send
the
funds
to
this
dow.
The
dow
has
to
be
created
before.
A
Yeah
and
deploying
the
dow
itself
is
the
where
we
really
need
it.
So
this
this
here's,
the
real
question
like,
should
we
should
we
even
put
it
in
the
advance
I
I'm
leaning
towards
that?
We
should
put
it
in
the
advanced
tab
and
okay.
So
just
for
context,
since
we
have
enough
people
here,
there
is
a
when
you
deploy
a
gardens.
A
A
L
L
Any
anyone
can
put
initial
liquidity
whenever
they
want
well.
The
only
thing
that
can
be
interesting
is
to
affair
to
the
secondary
market,
more
dc
or
less
dc.
That's
the
only
thing
that
could
affect
the
commons,
because.
L
L
L
A
A
L
There
will
be
some-
this
is
probably
100
pieces
there
that
are
not.
We
could
even
put
a
very
high
price
at
the
very
beginning,
like
one
tc
worth
100
dollars
in
in
honey,
and
you
just
have
to
mean
20
easy.
A
L
A
D
A
Cool,
okay,
great,
then
I'll
I'll
rewrite
this
section.
Otherwise
this
post
is
done
and
you
guys
made
a
lot
of
comments
already.
I
don't
know
if
it
needs
to
be
reviewed
again.
I
definitely
made
some
changes
in
it's
good
to
go
I'll
post
it
in
two
days.
C
A
C
Okay,
yeah,
the
only
things
that
I
have
questions
about
are
the
the
ones
that
I
don't
have
any
forum
posts
for
are
the
tokenthal
and
the
tokenphrase
and
the
price
floor.
I
know
that
manu
said
that
he
was
going
to
be
doing
them,
but
I
have
to
talk
to
him
about
it.
I
was
going
to
set
a
time
tomorrow
if
it
works
for
anybody
to
to
review
these
in
depth,
but
we
can
do
some
of
them
now.
C
I
know,
like
I
said
before
the
lauren
talked
about
the
creating
new
forum
posts.
If
everybody's
got
consensus
on
that,
I
can
start
creating
the
forum
new
forum
posts
with
the
with
the
post,
that
we
have
and
just
link
them
back.
Yeah
and-
and
those
are
the
only
things
I
need
clair
clarifying
about.
C
I
don't
think
it's
more
difficult
to
navigate.
I
just
think
that
you
know
if
I'm
somebody
who's
coming
in
here,
not
knowing
what's
going
on,
and
I
read
the
old
posts
and
I
get
kind
of
confused
about
either
the
format
or
the
responses
to
them,
because
a
lot
of
the
responses
are
definitely
geared
towards
the
either
the
hatch
or
or
some
prior
conversation
around
conviction
voting
in
theory.
So
so
yeah.
C
F
C
D
C
Yeah
I
have
some
already
worked
on
yeah
the
introduction
to
the
augmented
bonding
curve.
I've
been
writing
and-
and
the
comments
tribute
as
well,
so
the
only
ones
that
are
up
in
the
air.
The
token
thaw
section.
C
C
D
C
A
Cool
and
and
just
just
a
quick
on
lauren,
if
you're
doing
relative
spending
limit,
it's
now
spending
them.
A
Okay,
cool,
then,
let's
move
to
mitch,
you
had
a
couple
topics.
One
of
them
was
the
summary
in
advance
tab.
We
only
have
nine
minutes
left,
but
if
you
wanted
to
talk
about
that,
no.
A
Okay,
what
about
the
intro
post
did
you
have
anything
you
wanted
to
discuss.
B
On
that
I
mean
we
went
over
it
on
sunday.
I
incorporated
the
edits
I
sent
it
to
marco
this
morning.
So.
A
J
A
Cool
thanks,
olivia
well,
and
I
think
then
we
can
end
early,
oh
and
craig's.
Here
too,
hey
craig,
you
didn't
have
any
topics
or
anything
right.
A
Craig's,
usually
a
lurker
as
well,
so
I
think
I
think
we
can
just
end
early.
Thank
you
guys.