►
From YouTube: Param WG session turned into a Param debate!
Description
The Parameters Working Group deployed the dashboard for the Hatch and is now working on the dashboard for the Commons Upgrade. The goal is to get the community involved with as many technical decisions as possible to get a healthy TE Commons off the ground!
We gather every Tuesday at 5 pm CET.
Steward: Griff
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Yeah
we
can
get
started
so
my
intentions
for
the
call
are
to
go
through
the
board,
really
quick
check
on
the
final
status
of
these
issues
and
then
dive
into
a
param
debate.
Hopefully,
as
far
as
distractions,
I
have
none
I'll
pass
it
to
you
mitch.
B
C
Good
morning,
I'm
just
seeing
where
we're
at
excited
to
have
some
mornings
off
catch
up.
Hopefully,
and
let
me
see
griff,
you
already
went
right
and
I'll
pass
to
zap.
Wait
did
zep
just
go.
D
Thank
you
septim.
As
far
as
intentions
goes,
I
just
want
to
catch
up.
D
E
Hello
good
morning,
everyone
yeah-
I
just
want
to
catch
up
and
and
just
check
what
you
guys
are
doing
and
see
if
how
are
the
things
going
with
the
parties
and
songs?
Those
are
my
intentions,
my
distractions.
I
have
none
at
the
moment
and
I
will
pass
it
up
back
to
you
griff.
I
guess.
F
Awesome
can
you
hear
me:
okay,
yeah,
like
intentions,
are
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
new
issue,
template
and
check
out
like
how
things
are
going
to
the
debates
and
if
we
should
like
and
how
can
we
migrate,
like
update
all
the
previous
issues
to
the
new
template,
there's
already
implemented
and
yeah
no
distractions,
I
think
I
think,
there's
no
one
else.
Right.
G
G
Yeah
yeah,
so
my
intentions
for
this
call
is
just
to
to
unders.
This
is
my
first
parameters,
call
so
just
to
understand
what
goes
on
in
these
in
these
calls
just
to
listen
and
learn
and
distractions
for
today,
strangely,
not
distracted
today,
so
no
distractions.
Yet.
A
Nice
well
then,
let's
jump
into
the
first
thing:
how
do
we
make
pram
parties
better?
My
suggestion
would
be
that
you
don't
set
corn,
you
don't
create
a
time
until
you
have
at
least
two
people
who
will
actually
give
debate
who
will
actually
present.
You
know
you
gotta
go
find
the
presenters
to
join
you
in
the
debates.
A
Zap,
do
you
sorry
did
you
have
any
other?
Did
you
want
to
expand
on
that
question
more.
H
Yeah,
I
agree
that
maybe
having
less
but
more
promoted
parameter
weights
would
be
would
be
good.
I
think
also
like
the
last
couple.
Pram
parties
have
been
better
visited
that
that
before
I
think
it's
also
a
time
zone
stuff,
because
when
I
do
like
at
13
or
15
europe
time
nobody
comes
and
when
it,
when
it's
19,
there's
usually
more
people
there.
E
And
if
I
may
say
so,
I
will
suggest
to
be
more
debate
some
parties.
I
feel
that
within
the
debates
people
can,
because
there
is
a
lot
of
time
that
is
spent
on
explaining
the
tooling,
explaining
the
description
of
all
the
models.
Whether
if
you
do
the
debate,
it's
it,
you
will,
you
will
explain
it
while
you
are
debating
and
people
can
ask
on
the
spot
and
it
will
be
more
practical.
E
I
feel
because
you
know
just
have
a
bunch
of
proposals
being
debated
and
I
have
a
separate
section
for
questions
or
having
people
dedicated
for
one
on
one
or
just
channel
the
people
with
questions
through
params
text
channel
or
the
questions
channel.
I
think
we
can
foster
engagement
and
sort
of
work
around
the
idea
back
to
your
group.
I
A
A
Yeah
but
okay.
Well,
I
will
say
that
I
we
we
do
have
some
big
debates
coming
up
that
in
the
calendar
you
can
see
if
they
have
like.
I
put
some
whales
in
here.
A
A
We
have
zargum
very
late
in
the
evening
for
europe,
but
at
5
00
pm
on
friday,
and
we
have
trent
and
simon
de
la
riviere
on
sunday,
and
then
I
assume
we'll
have
some
big
debates
on
tuesday
and
on
monday
and
tuesday,
since
the
the
vote
should
be
over
on
the
tuesday
at
7
pm
europe
time.
A
I
You're,
just
showing
the
just
the
that's
the.
I
I
B
A
And
then
you
know
these
other
ones.
It
was
just
hard
to
find
times
with
these
guys,
so
the
ones
that
we
have
on
friday,
I'm
I
don't
have
to
host
them
by
the
way
I'm
happy
to
participate
if
someone
else,
but
I'll
definitely
be
going
to
them.
A
I
A
About
that
one
man,
okay,
cool.
I
think
this
is
enough
on
the
debates.
Unless
does
anyone
else
have
any
ideas?
I
I
I
I
think
we
don't
add
any
more
unless
there's
like
someone
who's
a
large
token
yeah.
B
H
E
Grief,
will
you
share
the
list
of
people?
You
have
our
rich
cup
holders,
so
I
can
do.
E
They
are
reached
for
the
next
20
or
next
ten,
so
I
can
sort
of
immediately
send
them
these
dates
and
let
them
know
they
can
join.
So
we
can
see
if
a
last
push
of
these
people
can
it
will
be
worth
it.
E
Yeah,
just
a
list
of
people
who
you
have
are
reached
from
the
top
token
holders,
so
I
don't
resent
the
same
message
to
them
and
I
can
outreach
the
next
20
next
10
people
on
that
list.
A
E
So
I.
A
We
actually
have
a
list
of
the
tc
token
holders,
like
the
people
who
have
tc
tokens
and
how
much
they
have.
Yes,
there
was
elizabeth
wow.
I
didn't
know
we
made
that
list.
Okay,
well,
yeah
go
for
the
list.
I
would
I
would
go
from
the
top
man
just
do
them
all
ping
them
all
and
because,
like
yeah,
I
pinged
most
of
the
I
pinged
all
of
the
top
ten
but
okay,
but
they
could
use
an
extra
reminder.
You
know,
okay,.
A
Cool
cool,
then,
let's
see,
let's
move
on
to
the
board
actually.
A
Yeah,
please,
I
think
I
think
she's
got
she's
got
him.
Yeah,
I'm
sure
he's
sucked
into
some
giveth
stuff
is
losing
track
of
time,
but
yeah,
because
actually
a
lot
of
these,
let's
see,
reserve
ratio
link
is
not
working.
There's
no
tool
tip
need
to
move
the
tag,
so
it's
easier
to
click.
F
A
F
A
A
We
actually
made
an
application
like
a
fork,
basically
of
herself
fork
for
bright
id
and
forgive
it
that's
kind
of
cool,
but.
A
What
about
the
what's
the
plan
with
the
github
issue?
Did
you
end
up
passing
them
through.
F
Implemented
yeah,
no,
like
okay,
so
it's
it's
a
twofold
thing:
it's
implemented
right
now!
So
if
you
go
there
and
generate
an
issue,
you
will
have
the
template.
F
F
So
yeah,
I
even
sent
you
a
message
and
we
can
just
like
once
it's
validated
the
templates
correct
and
implement
it
correctly.
Then
we
can.
I
can
just
like
quickly,
descript
and
run
like
my
afternoon,
the
like
just
update
all
the
issues
that
you
already
have
to
the
new
new
template
cool.
Well,
it
looks
good
from
first
price
name
should
nulli
all
of
the
all
of
the
issues
which
one.
F
A
No,
that's
just
that
was
just
from
that's
mitch's.
I
I
A
Okay,
cool
well
yeah.
Maybe
nothing
would
you
be
able
to
review
the
issue
template
I'm
like
frozen.
Can
you
guys
hear
me?
Okay,.
H
Yeah
yeah
yeah.
We
can
hear
you
review
it
in
which
way.
F
H
A
Do
we
do
we
have
it
so
that
you
can
add
extra
cv,
steps.
F
I
A
F
Awesome
and
okay
and
then
just
one
more
question
to
check
yeah.
You
said
the
market
cap
so
right
now
the
order
of
the
columns
is
reserve,
supply
price
and
then
like
market
cap,
would
go
where
like
yeah
right
next
to
the
price.
Okay,
okay
reserve
supply
price
market
cap,
okay,
awesome
and
yeah;
okay.
So
after
I
change
those
little
things,
I
can
just
run
script
to
update
all
of
the
issues.
F
F
A
Okay,
cool
and
then
see
what
would
we
do
differently?
Branch
for
reptix
dies.
So
this
is
closed
and
that's
it.
That's
that's
the
without
pedro.
I
don't
think
it's
worth
going
into
these
other
issues
so
might
as
well
just
dive
into
the
pram
debate.
Is
there
any
other
topics.
H
Yeah,
just
just
a
small
one,
because
we
had
comments
in
the
in
the
premise
channel
this
week
about
some
error
and
so
and
the,
and
there
was
a
user
who
got
confused
because
when
they
were
trying
to
add
a
step,
there
wasn't
a
little
red
x
to
close
the
the
window
and
they
kind
of
didn't
have
the
idea
to
just
click
outside
of
the
window.
H
A
I
we
could
add
it.
I
bet
it
doesn't
get
added.
You
can
make
the
issue,
but
I
I
I
mean
we
have
some
other
issues
that
pedro's
behind
on
and
is
focusing
on
the
the
giveth
launch
and
we
only
in
the
end
the
giveth
token
launch
and
the
pram
debates
are
like
targeting
the
same
day.
So
I
just
don't
think
pedro
is
gonna
prioritize
the
x.
H
A
B
Well,
so
I
I
would
like
to
open
up
this
debate
and
I'm
wondering
if
anybody
has
already
a
set
of
parameters
that
they
would
like
to
showcase
and
debate
champion.
G
B
J
Hey
guys,
sorry
eavesdrop
on
griff's
computer
when
I'm
not
in
the
call
so.
B
Yeah
yeah,
okay!
Well,
let's,
let's
get
this
started
so
we've
got
three.
I
could
do
four,
so
we
do
that
five
and
five
we'll
do
four
we'll
do
four
and
four.
So
four
minutes
four
minutes
to
present
now
we'll
do
five
minutes
present
five
minutes
of
questions
so
nuggen,
do
you
feel,
like
you,
wanna,
take
it
away
and
go
first.
H
Sure
why
not,
let
me
all
right
open
it
for
a
second.
I
think.
B
H
Okay,
so
that
proposal
is
again
mathematics
but
version
number
three
with
a
one
million
dollar
common
pool.
H
So,
starting
with
the
token
freeze
and
tokens
all
we
have
an
opening
price
of
70
cents,
26
weeks
freeze,
which
is
2
times
13
and
77
weeks
4,
which
is
11
times
7..
H
H
I
think
guaranteeing
six
months
of
of
price
floor
is
important,
but
after
that
I
think
people
should
should
be
able
to
to
leave
if
they
feel
so
because,
further
than
that
it
just
you
know
it's
information,
you
want
to
know
so
if
people
want
to
leave
but
can't
you
kind
of
yeah
restricting
the
flow
of
information
there.
So
I
think
six
months
is
enough
to
kind
of
give
security,
but
not
too
much.
H
Then
we
get
to
the
bond
group.
The
bonding
curve
has
a
77
opening
price
84
for
yeah
84
commons
tribute
and
then
3.5
percent
in
three
point
five
percent
out
tribute
which,
for
a
total
of
seven
percent
tribute
for
somebody
who
gets
in
and
gets
out
again
so
this
high
tribute
helps
us
have
a
steep
reserve
ratio.
H
It's
we
have
a
reservation
of
14.74,
which
is
higher
than
than
others
like
I've,
seen
kind
of
the
the
normal
to
be
like
around
20,
but
but
I
personally
like
it,
because
I
think
the
price
should
be
able
to
to
develop
and
enterprise
discovery.
H
If
there
is
enough
enough
interest
there,
I
think
if
we
go
to
the
issue,
we
can
see
that
if
we
get
to
a
reserve
balance
of
100
million,
which
is
a
lot,
the
price
would
be
around
140
bit
less,
which
I
think
is
right
like
if
you,
if
you
look
at
other
big
projects,
like
you,
know,
maker
or
stuff,
like
that,
if
if
the
tc
gets
to
be
so
important
and
have
so
much
weight
in
the
space
that
it
has
100
million
in
the
reserve,
then
yeah.
H
I
think
it's
justified
have
a
token
which
gets
that
value
is
also
to
prevent
like
big
whales
coming
late
and
buying.
H
Then
we
get
to
the
tower
boating.
Towering
is
91,
support
required
seven
percent
quorum
and
which
is
relatively
normal
and
then
seven
days
for
a
boat
four
days
delegated
three
days
for
the
quiet
ending
and
if
there's
an
extension,
you
have
a
three-day
extension
with
one
day
execution
delay.
This
is
pretty
standard.
The
support
is
a
bit
higher
the
quorum,
a
bit
lower
but
yeah
standard,
and
then
we
have
a
spending
limit
for
the
for
the
conviction,
voting
spending
limit
of
13
with
a
minimum
conviction
of
four
and
the
growth
of
growth
of
three
days.
H
This
sets
the
normal
like
case
at
around
10
percent
maximum
standard,
which
I
think
yeah.
I
think
it's
fine.
I
think
it
is.
It
allows
to
be
ambitious
if,
especially,
if
you're
looking
at
our
one
million
common
pool
but
without
overspending
and
conviction
will
grow
is
fast,
so
you
kind
of
get
the
opportunity
to
to
fund
stuff
in
a
relatively
short
time.
H
B
Get
no,
you
even
got
35
seconds
left
now
again:
fantastic
yeah.
B
Nice,
okay!
Well,
let's
put
another
five
minutes
on
the
board:
sorry,
there's
a
cow
outside
my
door,
one
second.
A
H
Well,
because
I
I
think
yeah
I
want
the
to
be
able
to
fund
stuff
fast
like
yes,
I
think
we
should
be
have
a
dynamic
marketplace
of
of
proposals
and
people
just
requesting
funding,
and
I
don't
think
yeah
I
think
it
it
is.
It
is
good
to
allow
to
allow
lots
like
I
want
people
to
have
the
tokens
parked
somewhere
and
for
a
very
long
time.
I
think
if
there's
something
really
big,
then
of
course,
but
for
normal
day-to-day
funding
stuff,
I
think
we
can.
C
H
H
Well,
if
you,
if
you
look
at
three
months,
I
mean
you
still
can
but
yeah
you
didn't.
You'd
need
people
to
just
kind
of
take
the
opportunity
cost
there
for
a
longer
time.
Yes,.
H
Yeah,
I
feel
like,
if
they're
really,
if
something
doesn't
work
for
like
in
a
month
or
something
maybe
that's,
also
a
good
signal
to
kind
of
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
kind
of
try
to
find
a
new,
a
new
way
so
yeah
to
make
it
more
appealing
or
just
kind
of
iron.
It
out
and
coordinate
with
other
people.
A
H
That
was
actually
the
huanka
was
inspirational.
I
like
this,
this
million
dollar
austrians
baby
stuff.
I
think
it
was
cool.
Also
the
initial
price
would
be
at
137
after
the
buy-in.
So
it's
not
really
below
because
expect
the
tc
to
just
sell
all
the
tokens
right
away.
H
So
you
could
use
it's
not
really
that
it
also.
Okay,
I
don't
know,
I
think
it's
you
know.
If
you
really
just
want
to
sell
it
directly,
then
then
it
kind
of
is
as
a
failure.
So
you
should
people.
People
should
want
to
to
contribute
in
a
way
together
and
like
it,
incentivizes
people
to
just
continue
contributing
and
continue
adding
value
and
not
just
cashing
out
the
moment
they
they
can.
B
I
just
think
there's
some
some
psychological
barriers
in
the
way
that
we
present
it
like
people
put
in
one
x
die
and
then
the
output
is
70
cents
like
yes,
but
technically,
with
the
initial
buy,
but
just
like
just
that
argument
alone,
without
looking
at
the
initial
buy,
will
be
a
tough
sell.
I
think
for
hatchers.
H
H
Yeah,
well,
I
think
I
personally
like
it
when
the
entry
and
exhibit
are
the
same.
I
think
it
feels
it
feels
fair
for
me
and
I
think
3.5
is
a
number
which
is
low
enough
to
to
not
be
an
issue
when
you
are
individually
like
thinking
of
buying
or
selling
you
pay
3.5,
and
it's
not
that
much,
but
on
the
total
it
does
get
a
bit
a
bit
higher,
but
yeah.
H
I
think
I
think
that
will
make
you
think
twice
if
you
want
to
just
go
in
and
go
out
fast
like
the
this
result,
ratio
is
more
to
give
the
the
token
price
a
a
a
way
to
grow
if
the
tc
gets
really
big
and
not
end
up
with
the
issue
that,
even
if
you
have
like
you're
you're
moving
thousands
and
thousands
of
dollars
and
just
somebody
can
come
in
and
buy
up
30
of
the
of
the
supply
just
because
your
bonding
curve
was
turned
too
flat
at
that
point.
So
that
was
a
bit
more.
E
B
Well,
thank
you,
nugget,
mathematics,
v3.
If
you
guys
love
it,
give
it
a
like
share
it
with
your
friends
and
family
I'd
like
to
pass
it
to
zep
now,
you'd
want
to
present
as
well.
D
I
F
B
B
Thanks
epp,
exciting,
as
ever,
tc
casino
we've
got
five
minutes
for
questions
starting
now,
any.
A
Questions
I
I
I
want
to
bring
this
idea
into
the
forefront.
I
was
excited
for
tec
casino
to
do
it
with
the
small
reserve
ratio.
If
you
go
back
to
the
bonding
curve
module,
there's
a
challenge
that
it
gets
really
hard
to
out
govern
the
hatcheries
right,
if
you
add
a
transaction
for
let's
say
five
million
dollars
like.
Can
you
simulate
a
five
million
dollar
purchase.
A
It
it
should
work,
you'll
notice
that
barely
any
tokens
are
created,
and
this
means
that
the
hatchers
have
all
of
the
two
million
tokens,
but
then
the
the
people
who
are
buying
in
later,
it's
like
impossible
to
get
governance
power
unless
the
hatcheries
sell,
and
then
that
means
during
the
freeze,
the
hatcheries
basically
run
the
show
so
yeah.
E
B
I
I'm
a
big
fan
personally
of
like
the
the
medium
reserve
ratio,
low
reserve
balance,
because
then
you
got
a
fair
amount
of
casino
action
at
the
beginning.
But
then,
once
the
dow
kind
of
like
levels
out
and
stabilizes,
you
don't
get
the
same
effect,
so
it
like
becomes,
becomes
more
stable
and
easier
to
buy
and
sell.
B
That's
cool
well
thanks,
zap,
that
was
issue.
91,
tc,
casino,
v3,.
B
Yes,
okay,
cool!
Well,
we
got
six
left.
B
A
B
B
A
Here,
so
that's
a
good,
that's
a
good
call.
We
should
get
updates
from
pedro.
That's
great,
that
there's
another
debate
right
here,
so
we
can
just
continue
to
roll
in
a
pedro.
How
are
things
in
the
prams.
K
I
don't
know
if
you
understand
your
your
question.
You
were
asking
me
about
the
dev
activities
or
if
I
managed
to
go
in
a
okay
about
a
deaf,
so
I
didn't
have
much
time
this
week
to
look
after
the
the
issues
every
day
I'm
going
to
the
repo
to
see
if
we
have
any
other
new
issues
to
see
if
any
enough.
This
is
urgent,
but
I'm
currently
a
little
bit
overwhelmed
with
the
issues
on
on
give
it.
A
I
think
the
only
one
that's
really
well
there's
this
one,
that's
tagged
with
a
high
priority,
making
the
reversio
link
and
then
there's
advanced
settings
getting
the
advanced
settings
to
be
passed
through,
and
then
this
remove
a
is
like.
I
think
you
already
have
it
in
some
kind
of.
A
I
think
you
yeah,
I
think
you
already
have
that
fixed
somewhere.
I
think
those
are
the
only
three
issues,
so
I
almost
feel
like
I
mean
because
these
two
are
high
priority.
I
think
you
could
clear
the
board
pretty
quickly.
K
A
K
A
And
we
can
because
we
can
also
just
delete
the
advanced
settings
from
the
issue,
but
I
think
you
just
need
to
tell
vtor
if,
if
you're
going
to
fix
it
or
not
before
he
makes
the
issue
template
go
back
in
time
and
edit
all
of
them.
Because
then
we
can
just
remove
the
advanced
settings,
modify
tag
because,
honestly,
there
hasn't
been
any
no
one's
been
modifying
the
advanced
settings
at
all.
So.
K
A
K
A
Okay,
cool!
Well,
that's!
That's
it
for
the
board
right.
Is
there
anything
else
that
we
needed
pedro
for
vitor
or
nuggen.
A
B
B
We've
got
the
full
spectrum.
Today,
jeez,
hey
griff,
you
had
some
do
you
want
to
just
carry
through
right
with
the
debates,
then
I
know
you
had
one
that
you
wanted
to
present.
A
Yeah,
let
me
just
message
the
bright
id
crowd
and
tell
them
I'm
going
to
be
just
a
few
minutes
late,
so
I
can
present
this
okay
sure.
So
give
me
just
a
second.
C
I've
got
another
meeting
that
I'd
like
to
go
to,
but
I
hopefully
this
isn't
too
off
topic.
I
have
a
friend
who
is
setting
up
wants
to
set
up
like
a
he
needs
to.
He
needs
to
consult
with
some
token
engineers.
Long
story
short
can
do.
Are
we
doing
that
yet?
A
A
A
I'll
get
my
rant
started
and
take
the
extra
time
because
I'm
a
talker
okay,
so
this
is.
This
is
a
very
slight
deviation
that
I
haven't
submitted
yet
of
the
goldilocks:
a
million
dollar
a
one
dollar
gambit
for
a
million
dollar
goldilocks
faster
erogeny.
A
So
I
like
opening
price
of
one
dollar.
I
think
it's
like
to
stick
with
the
goldilocks
things
theme
trying
to
keep
easy
fun
numbers
and
a
token
freeze
of
six
months
and
a
token
thought
of
one
year.
It's
the
shortest
most
reasonable
thought,
and
I
think
this
is
just
I
don't
think,
there's
other
options
for
this
module
period.
Next
next
is
the
bonding
curve.
So
this
is
the
one
change
I
make
from
the
original
faster
erogeny.
A
If,
if
people
buy
about
five
million
dollars
worth
of
tokens,
they
still,
I
mean
this
will
be
much
less
because
it
won't
be
this
bad,
because
the
entry
tribute
won't
stay
this
high.
But
at
least
then
we
increase
the
token
supply.
By
about
a
million,
you
know
and
it'll
probably
be
even
more
so
it
takes
five
million
dollars
to
get
to
half
the
governance
of
the
hatcher's.
A
But
I
think
that,
considering
that
the
hatchers
will
sell
some
tokens
after
six
months
and
da
da,
I
think
it's
okay,
it's
still
a
little
bit
hard,
but
in
the
end
it
is
a
bull
market
and
we
should
keep
a
reserve
ratio-
that's
kind
of
low,
so
we
can
get
some
price
action
when
that
five
million
dollars
is
purchased.
It's
it's.
It
brings
the
price
up
to
five
dollars
and
29
cents,
so
it's
still
like
a
pretty
mild
price
increase.
A
So
that's
what
we
have
to
fight
like
how
much
do
we
want
the
price
to
go
up,
but
then
how
much
governance
do
we
want
to
allow
people
who
weren't
in
the
hatch
to
be
able
to
receive-
and
it's
a
tough
dynamic?
So
I'm
going
with
the
goldilocks
number
of
69
on
the
commons
tribute-
and
this
also
has
the
progressive
flipping
of
tributes.
So
I'm
a
firm
believer
that
people
will
not
use
the
bonding
curve
app
to
buy
tokens
and
it's
almost
irrelevant
to
worry
about.
A
Oh
people
feel
like
they're
being
taxed,
they
just
won't.
They
won't
because
they
won't
do
it.
They
will
be
actually
buying
tokens
on
honey,
swap
and
buying
tokens
on
sushi
swap
and
wherever,
wherever
we're
selling
tokens.
So
they
won't
experience.
This
it'll
be
the
our
bots
that
take
advantage
of
this
issuance
module
to
to
do
it,
and
that
was
how
it
was
with
true
bit
and
you
can
see
the
graph
people
are
buying
it
on
unit
swap
and
then
arbitrage
bots
are
using
the
bonding
curve.
A
So
this
this
will
start
with
a
very
high
entry
tribute
because
there's
no
liquidity
and
at
launch
this
is
the
only
place
to
buy
tokens,
and
I
don't
want
people
to
buy
tokens
cheap,
who
don't,
who
aren't
happy
to
send
22
of
their
funds
towards
advancing
token
engineering?
Full!
Stop!
That's
just
the
deal
you
know.
If
you
don't
want
to,
in
part,
donate
to
support
the
advancement
of
token
engineering,
then
you
don't
get
the
cheapest
tokens
and
we
let
the
people
who
do
care
buy
the
cheap
tokens.
A
But
then,
every
month
we
lower
it
by
four
percent
and
increase
the
exit
tribute
by
two
percent,
and
I
think
it's
really
important
to
have
a
high
exit
tribute.
I
know
it,
it
lowers
it,
but
in
the
case
that
there
is
a
governance
problem
90
seconds.
A
Thank
you
in
the
case
that
there
is
a
governance
problem,
then
people
will
leave
and
the
price
will
go
down
and
that
will
start
funding
filling
the
the
common
pool
with
funds
which
is
like
a
counter
balancing
of
the
of
the
market
demand,
and
this
counterbalance
act
is
really
powerful
because
now
each
token
has
more
governance
power
because
there's
smaller
supply
and
more
money
in
the
common
pool.
So
when
people
leave
now
governance,
tokens
become
more
expensive.
A
This
the
governance
value
increases
and
I
think
that's
a
really
nice
dynamic.
So
I
would
like
to
have
maybe
even
zero
entry
tribute
and
just
exit
tribute
at
the
end.
But
in
the
end,
this
this
proposal
is
at
the
end,
to
have
a
two
percent
entry
tribute
twelve
percent
exit
tribute.
I
really
like
these
parameters.
85
support
required
vote
duration
of
five
days,
but
long
vote,
quiet
ending
period
of
three
days
in
case
it's
a
controversy.
If
it's
not
a
controversial
proposal
at
all.
A
If
then,
it
just
passes
in
five
days.
If
it's
a
controversial
proposal,
then
it
gets
two
days
added
and
maybe
more
through
a
more
quiet,
ending
extensions
and
then
the
conviction
voting
settings
are
set
so
that
it
is,
I
really
like
these
1147,
so
you
can
kind
of
multiply
the
conviction
growth
by
four
and
that's
like
the
longest
that
it's
reasonable
to
wait
for
a
proposal
like
you
can
see
that
from
one
month
we
got
like
forty.
Two
thousand
tokens
to
three
months
ends
up
forty
thousand
tokens
for
one
dollar.
A
Basically
is
the
is
the
game
that
you
make
from
one
month
to
two
months,
but
waiting
from
two
weeks
to
a
month,
there's
like
some
serious
gain,
so
it's
it's
that
I
I
figure
like
about
a
month
is
as
long
as
I
would
want
anyone
to
wait
to
see
if
a
proposal
passes
and-
and
so
I
designed
around
this
conviction-
growth
of
seven
days
and
what's
cool
with
this-
is
first
off.
No
proposals
can
pass
in
eight
hours
like
good.
A
No
one
should
go
to
sleep
and
wake
up
and
all
of
a
sudden
we
spent
money.
You
know
there
should
be
an
opera,
it's
like
good
advice
process,
but
if
we
all
rally
around
you
know
if
everyone
wants
to
spend,
you
know
10
grand.
A
Quick,
oh
then,
then
everyone
can
pile
in
their
tokens,
but
really
most
proposals
will
take
about
three
days
to
pass
in
three
days
like
if
there's
a
large
consensus
of
of
of
people
who
want
it.
It'll
pass
like
you
know,
for
small
proposals.
Twenty
to
30
percent
of
the
active
voting
tokens
okay,
but
we
can
still
pass
50
000
proposals
in
like
two
weeks
with
25
of
the
vote.
A
Okay,
so
I'm
open
for
questions.
Oh
thank
you.
B
Yeah,
so
going
back
to
your
tribute
script,
I
don't
know
I'd
like
what
is
this
like
weird,
you
know
the
fifth
tax
you
know
20
to
come
in
at
the
beginning
and
then
like
20
to
leave
at
the
beginning
and,
if
you're
making
the
argument
anyway,
that
it's
all
going
to
be
arbitrage
post,
launch
like
why?
Wouldn't
you
just
keep
them
lower
like
two
or
three
percent
to
get
volume.
A
The
big
thing
here
is,
I
would
like
to
see
a
million
dollars
in
the
common
pool
and
I
at
launch
the
only
way
to
get
tec
tokens
will
be.
This
will
be
the
bonding
curve.
So
I
think
people
it
will
be
worth
it
to
speculate
on
the
on
the
tec
token,
even
with
this
20
tribute,
because
it's
the
only
way
to
get
tokens,
and
so,
if
you
are,
you
know
ideologically
aligned
and
you
want
to
support.
A
B
But
I
understand,
except
for
the
ones
that
we
might
make
with
our
with
the
initial
buy,
but
anyway
so
here
I
hear
two
different
things,
though
you're
saying
20
for
speculators
and
people
can
still
speculate.
But
then
you
say
we
only
want
value-aligned
people,
but
these
value-aligned
people
you're
like
oh
well,
then
they
could
still
speculate
and
still
sell.
It's
like
if
your
value
aligned
you're,
not
really
in
it,
to
sell
but
then
you're
saying.
Well,
then
the
speculators
still
have
this
like
barrier
entry.
So
it's
like.
A
A
Or
even
just
feeling
like
okay,
I
bought
a
token
so
like
in
this
case.
Let's
say
so
right
after
launch.
Somebody
buys
the
token
they
put
in
five
thousand
dollars
and
they
get
two
thousand
eight
hundred
tokens,
which
is
actually
not
five
thousand
dollars
closer
to
four
thousand
dollars.
So
they
take
this
psychological
hit
on
paper,
but
that
psychological
hit
is
relieved.
A
It's
not
that
they
have
to
sell
to
realize
they
gains
they
look
at
ether,
scan
and
they're
like
good
or
sorry
block
scout
they're,
like
oh
good,
I
have
more
money
than
I
than
I
thought,
I'm
glad
I
invested
in
the
tc.
H
I
also
wanted
to
ask
something
that
has
to
do
with
that,
because
you
said
okay,
so
the
people
are
not
going
to
it's
going
to
be
arbitrage
spots.
People
are
going
to
be
buying
a
honey
swap
sushi
swap
whatever,
so
the
arbitrage
spots
would
go
to
to
buy
from
the
warning
proof,
but
I
imagine
that
with
such
a
high
such
a
high
tribute
it
will
take
a
while
for
them
to
be
profitable.
H
So
the
moment
they
do,
they
will
probably
dump
a
lot.
So
you
would
have
the
the
price
probably
whip,
sawing
you
know
it's
it
raises
razors,
then
suddenly
it
becomes
profitable,
then
big,
dump,
and-
and
do
you
think
that
maybe
it's
that
could
yeah?
I
don't
know
if
somebody's
looking
in
to
get
into
the
tc
and
just
sees
that
there's
some
dumps
and
pumps
that
they,
maybe
just
don't
like
it
or
just
buy
it
and
then
see
if
it
goes
down
five
minutes
later,
a
lot.
A
There
will
be
two
different
prices:
there'll
be
the
price
on
the
bonding
curve,
which
will
have
these
dumps
that
you
say,
but
the
market
price
will
not
the
market
price
will
so
the
bonding
curve
price
will
kind
of
just
like
stabilize
right
and
then
when
people
are
when
the
market
price
hits
above
the
entry
tribute,
then
there's
lots
of
little
buys
and
sells
right,
and
so
that
will
slowly.
A
B
A
A
A
Okay,
so
then
so
yeah,
so
then
they
get
800k
tokens
for
3ml.
A
The
hatcheries
will
have
to
sell,
I
mean
the
the
the
challenge.
Is
this
price
like
we?
We
want
the
price
to
be
able
to
go
up.
You
know
if
we
have
a
really
high
reserve
ratio,
the
price
doesn't
go
up
very
much.
Also.
This
has
to
be
selected
by
the
hatchery,
so
the
hatcheries
you
know,
were
willing
to
take
a
risk
and
put
their
money
here
in
wrapped
x,
die
effectively
for
six
months
during
this
bull
market,
pretty
pretty
huge
risk,
so
we
have
to
give
them
some
reward,
but
then
yeah
anyway.
H
Yeah,
I
think,
does
somebody
else
who's
missing
right
now
I
think
lauren
did
you
want
to
present
something.
J
H
D
I
have
a
bunch
of
notes
of
a
proposal
that
I'm
meant
to
put
together
last
week.
However,
it
was
a
fork
of
the
tc
casino
and
the
bolsheviks
gambit,
and
it's
called
casino
royale
like
let's
have
all
the
communist
and
emi6
just
have
fun
with
with
the
bonding
curve.
D
But
yeah
like
this,
like
these
health
issues,
haven't
really
like.
Let
me
like
put
it
together
and
also
like
there
are
newer
forks
of
both
proposals,
so
yeah
I'm
trying
to
catch
up
to
be
able
to
merge
these
two,
and
I
would
most
likely
most
likely
to
replicate
the
tc
casinos
volatility,
but
with
some
same
parameters
from
the
bolshevik
that
focus
on
the
common
pool.
D
D
I
promise
I'll
have
something
for
this
week,
but
yeah
like
right
now.
I
I
feel
that
I
just
need
to
like
listen
to
more
more
proposals
like
today
to
get
a
just
a
better
sense
of
everything,
but
but
yeah
almost
there
like
I,
I
have
the
idea.
I
just
need
to
play
more
with
with
the
dashboard
for
reaching
a
final
proposal.
H
Yeah,
well,
that's
awesome,
that's
cool
great,
so
yeah
and
I
don't
know.
Maybe
you
a
delightful
abyss.
Did
you
do?
You
have
had
time
to
make
a
parameter
or
something.
G
Oh,
no,
not
yet
I'm
still
wrapping
my
mind
around
how
how
the
bonding
curve
works.
So
this
has
been
really
really
good.
You
can
just
like
hear
how
everybody's
thinking
about
this.
It's
really
cool
but
yeah,
I'm
sure
I'm
sure
I'll
have
something
soon.
B
Well,
I
I've
always
got
I've
always
got
space
to
show
more
bolsheviks,
gambit
bolshevik's
gambit
via
pavlov's
dog
and
maybe
it'll
like
y'all
get
in
your
brains,
but
I
feel
like
most
of
these
people
are
already
on
the
communist
train.
You
know,
maybe
delightful
abyss
hasn't
had
the
pleasure
yet,
but.
B
I
I
can
present
that
one
if
you
want
it's
the
the
same
bolsheviks,
gambit
v4,
yeah
great.
I
think
zepty
wanted
to
say
something,
but.
H
B
All
right,
okay,
so
let's
go!
This
is
bullshit's
gambit
v4,
with
revolutionary
opening
price
and
iron
curtain,
conviction
voting
so
kind
of
like
playing
on
the
idea
of
like
having
a
revolution
that
like
happens
quickly.
It's
agile
it
like
creates
all
these
things,
and
then
you
know
as
it
matures
things
stable
out,
and
you
know
we
start
to
set
up
something:
that's
a
bit
more
functional
and
a
bit
less
volatile
and
then
the
the
revolutionary
opening
price
is
the
one
x
die.
So
you
can
see.
B
I
was
funny
in
zeps,
it's
like
after
the
initial
buy,
it
goes
way
up
over
5x
die
the
opening
price,
but
it
says
opening
price
5x
die,
capitalist
chad,
1x
die
marxist
vlad
and
if
we
just
get
into
the
juice
of
it
here,
let's
fork
this
bad
boy.
Let's
see
what
happens.
B
So
here
I'm
looking
on
the
dashboard.
We've
got
a
1x
die
opening
price,
a
short
12
weeks
or
three
month
freeze
and
a
one
year
thaw
I
like
to
say
at
this
point
that
it's
like
technically
we've
been
in
the
freeze
for
already
five
months.
So
I
think
three
months
is
very
reasonable
at
this
point
and
then
we
can
be
done
and
over
with
vesting
from
the
commons
upgrade
in
less
than
a
year
and
a
half
after
that.
B
B
But
the
main
thing
is
that
we
want
to
incentivize
buying
more
than
selling
so
that
people
are
coming
in
and
there's
just
like
a
little
bit
more
of
like
a
disincentive
to
sell
and
I'd
like
to
keep
this
like
that
for
at
least
three
months,
and
then
I'd
like
to
move
down
to
something
that's
more
closer
to
two
or
three
percent
entry
and
exit
tribute
so
that
we
have
like
reasonable
volume
within
the
augmented
bonding
curve
and
there's
not
too
many
barriers
for
people
to
come
in
arbitrage
or
just
to
simply
mint
tokens
from
the
bonding
curve.
B
And
then
so.
The
nice
thing
that
I
was
trying
to
explain
from
the
casino
thing
was
that
since
we
have
a
low
reserve,
this
is
under
400k
at
the
beginning,
the
reserve,
you
could
see
the
initial
buy,
increases
the
price,
almost
50
percent,
and
that's
just
because
there's
a
low
low
reserve
balance.
Our
reserve
ratio
is
fine
so
that
when
we
get
into
the
higher
volumes
like
if
we
wow
this
always
comes
with
10..
It's
like
it
saves
the
steps.
When
you
make
the
proposal.
B
B
Moving
on
to
dow
voting,
sport
required
88
minimum
quorum,
eight
percent,
low
duration,
six
delegated
three
quietening,
two
quite
an
extension
three
and
then
an
execution
delay
of
one.
So
basically,
the
main
points
here
that
I
want
to
touch
on
is
that
a
we
can
be
done
with
dow
voting
within
one
week,
assuming
that
there's
no
contention
and
if
there
is
a
discrepancy
between
how
delegates
vote
and
how
voters
would
prefer
the
outcome
to
be
so
like.
B
In
the
case
of
like
taking
back
your
delegates,
vote
and
recasting
it,
then
we
wait
for
that
and
then
we
add
a
very
generous
three
days
to
get
more
voter
input
after
it's
been
flipped.
B
And
so
this
is
the
the
conviction
voting
settings.
This
is
the
the
iron
curtain
so
to
speak,
and
so
we
have
a
really
good
threshold
for
passing
funding
proposals,
and
so
you
can
see
here
if
we
make
some
examples
with
35
000
in
the
requested
900k
in
the
common
pool
and
effective
supply
of
1.5
million.
So
this
is
like
theoretical.
I
really
think
our
effective
supply
will
be
a
little
bit
lower
than
that.
It
still
takes
exponentially
more
tec
tokens
to
get
that
35
grand.
B
So
if
we're
looking
at
opening
price
of
one
one
x
die
and
you
want
35,
000
it'll
cost
at
least
130
000
or
x
die
to
pass
that
proposal,
so
we
really
create
like
a
good
safeguard
and
even
if
we
get
down
into
the
lower
limits
like
1k,
you
can
see
that
it
still
takes
way
more
to
pass
these
low
proposals
and
finish
finish
anyway.
This
is
really
important
because
we
realistically
won't
see
proposals
that
are
going
to
be
under
10k.
B
So
we
could
try
and
we
could
assume
that
there's
more
in
the
comment
pool,
but
you
know
realistically
looking
at
it
from
launch
if
we're
using
those
like
hatcher
amounts
like
it,
it
wouldn't
be
possible
to
go
off
with
the
significant
amount
of
funds
and
I
think
that's
because
we're
over
the
spending
limit.
Let's
try
that
again.
B
E
B
B
Not
much
I
can
do
about
that,
you
know
we
need
that
dual
cool
dual
pool
voting
settings.
You
know
dual
token.
D
I
have
a
question:
well,
not
really
a
question,
but
okay,
don't
you
think
that
the
minimum
conviction
is
kind
of
not
taking
advantage
of
the
tc
garden
having
a
dispute
protocol
likes
a
list,
so
in
the
long
term
it
might
be
more
difficult
to
pass
a
proposal
and
it
wouldn't
really
be
necessary
because
we
have
this
additional.
D
Like
security
measure
change
my
mind,
yeah.
B
Well,
the
nice
thing
about
having
the
minimum
conviction
is
that
spooky
proposals
can't
really
pass.
B
Like
it
kind
of
sets
that
minimum
bar,
so
it's
like,
if
you're
just
like
fooling
around-
and
you
want
to
get
like
two
grand
out
of
the
pool
and
the
pool's
like
a
million
or
something
it's
like
like
that-
doesn't
really
fly
under
any
circumstance
and
so
like
it
sets
that
bar.
So
that
you
have
to
justify
a
certain
amount
of
funding.
D
It
makes
sense,
I'm
just
I'm
just
thinking
of
yeah
like
what.
If
what,
if
the
conviction
growth
was
like,
let's
say
like
10
days
or
14
days,
and
we
could
bring
down
the
minimum
conviction
to
maybe
like
three
percent
or
something
like
that,
and
I
mean
it's
it's.
D
I
love
that,
like
that
shady
proposals
won't
be
able
to
pass
in
short
periods
of
time,
but
at
the
same
time,
because
of
how
the
tc
works
and
the
amount
of
people,
I
highly
doubt
that,
even
if
it's
easy
for
a
malicious
proposal
to
pass
like
after
two
or
three
days
for
this,
not
to
encounter
like
a
problem
when
celeste
is
is
invoked
so
because
in
a
way
I
feel
that,
in
in
the
long
term
having
this
minimum
conviction
might
be
a
little
bit
difficult,
especially
if
the
aim
of
the
proposal
is
to
let's
say
like
retain
people
so
that
we
can
benefit
the
common
pool
from
it.
D
D
Like.
I
don't
know
I
I
I
I
lost
my
train
of
thought,
sorry,
but
but
yeah
like
I,
I
I
just
feel
that
we
could.
We
could
maybe
explore
like
like
freer
perspectives
in
in
how
we
pass
proposals
counting
on
on
celeste.
D
B
H
Okay,
so
yeah
hi
judith,
I
saw
you
joined
during
mitch's
presentation.
H
H
Okay,
maybe
not
yeah.
Well,
I
think
we're
done
here.
If
zepty
you
wanna,
you
wanna
debate
something
about
the
casino,
that's
great.
If
not,
I
think
we
can
yeah.
Then
please.
H
That
is
always
kind
makes
me
kind
of
distrustful
just
to
begin
with,
because
you
know
you
expect
there
to
be
insiders,
and
in
this
case
okay,
so
the
reserve
ratio
is
very
low.
So
if
people
start
selling
right
away,
the
price
will
go
down
very
fast
and
there
won't
be
any
money,
but
like
this
low
reserve
ratio
would
will
always
will
also
make
that
the
price
rises
very
fast.
H
So
since
the
first
months
are
probably
going
to
be
the
most
volatile,
if
you
have
no
vesting,
you
will
have
the
situation
where
you
know
the
bonding
curve
opens.
People
buy
in
the
price,
goes
up
to
10
or
whatever,
and
just
you
have
the
founders,
probably
just
dumping
it
for
its
quick
10x,
and
that
is
a
bad
image.
I
think
setting
some
some
freeze
and
some
vesting
at
least
at
the
beginning,
for
the
time
where
was
where
it
will
probably
be
most
volatile
is
yeah.
H
It's
a
kind
of
a
way
of
saying
that
we
are
serious
and
we
are
here
for
the
long
run
and
we
are
just
not
trying
to
make
a
big
buck
the
quick
buck
amongst
people
who
were
working
to
build
it.
So
that
is
my
my
narrative
approach.
There.
H
Yes,
yes,
it
definitely
is,
I
think
there
is.
You
have
to
find
a
balance.
Definitely
yeah
I
mean
your
proposal
is
very
extreme,
so
it's
kind
of.
H
B
Sorry
to
cut
you
off
nugget,
I
have
to
jump
into
the
gardens
call,
but
I
wanted
to
thank
you
for
hosting
this
one.
G
E
G
D
Leave
to
prepare
the
cons
call,
but
thank
you
very
much
for
this
I'll
see
you
in
a
bit.