►
Description
The Parameters Working Group deployed the dashboard for the Hatch and is now working on the dashboard for the Commons Upgrade. The goal is to get the community involved with as many technical decisions as possible to get a healthy TE Commons off the ground!
We gather every Wednesday at 10pm CET.
Steward: Griff
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions distractions
04:16 - Disputable CV
22:54 - Conviction voting Dashboard
33:32 - Token thaw and ABC
44:51 - Augmented bonding curve
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Work
and
process
process-
that's
going
on
very
excited
to
have
sem
here
to
show
off
all
the
engineering
work
that's
been.
Have
that
he's
been
doing
around
conviction,
voting
and
he's
got
a
and
he's
got
a
proposal
again
for
reserve
ratio
which
is
going
to
be
interesting
here
and
besides
that,
I
think
I
don't
think
that
we'll
have
to
talk
praise
analysis
today,
because
that
call
is
next
or
maybe
in
two
hours
from
now.
They're
gonna
go
deep
in
the
appraised
analysis
stuff.
B
Oh,
hey:
wait:
go
ahead!
Okay,
great,
okay,
awesome,
cool,
hey
cool,
my
intentions
for
the
college,
just
to
sync
up
with
everybody,
I'm
just
excited
to
be
here.
I
worked
on
some
forums
posts
for
the
params,
but
I'm
just
yeah
just
here
to
listen.
I'm
slightly
distracted,
I'm
making
a
tweet
for
gameth
right
now,
but
other
than
that.
I'm
fully
here
and
I'll
pass
it
to
vitor.
C
D
Much
hello,
everyone,
no
distractions
for
now
intended
for
this
call
I'd
love
to
see
what's
happening
on
the
back
end
with
the
dashboard
spec
and
I'd
like
to
get
some
final
idea.
Validation
on
the
disputable
conviction,
voting
spec
that
we
hashed
out
on
sunday
and
then
I
guess,
check
in
for
the
forum
posts
and
see
if
there's
anything
that
can
be
done
or
advice
given
or
whatnot
and
I'll
give
it
to
noggin.
E
F
Hello,
everyone.
I
have
well
intentions.
I
guess
that
I
would
like
to
think
on
with
the
work
that
this
group
is
doing,
because
I
have
been
modeling
a
little
bit.
The
boarding
curve
and
conviction
voting
and
I've
seen
that
you
have
also
been
doing
some
research
on
on
that,
but
I
I
didn't
have
enough
time
to
check
it
out
properly.
So
probably
we
can
think
in
this
call
and
instructions
I
am
in
the
giveth
house.
I
had
paolo
behind
me
playing
the
vr,
but
not
anymore,
for
pablo
he's
now
working
again.
G
Thank
you,
sam
yeah.
My
intention
is
to
sync
up.
I
also
was
reading
a
bit
about
the
transferability
that
sam
was
helping
me.
I
I
found
like
it's
hard
to
find
the
research
and
then
I
thought
that
maybe
I
could
help
on
doing
the
ldrs
instead
of
doing
because
it's
very
hard
to
me
like
find
the
I
mean
I
can
choose
what
I
did
was
just
asking
sam,
but
it's
but.
H
A
I
think
so
so
maybe
we
should
start
with
mitch's,
disputable,
conviction,
voting
spec
and
we
can
try
to
be
relatively
quick.
But
I
think
it'll
help
inform,
stems
engineering,
work
and
maybe
also
mitch,
if
you
could
just
briefly
go
over
the
other
two
as
well
and
be
just
as
more
of
a
infor
from
informative.
A
D
D
Okay,
good,
so
we'll
just
look
at
this
one
first
or
do
you
want
to
start
from
tokenthaw?
No
you're?
It's
your
show,
okay,
all
right.
So
this
is
the
spec
that
we
hopefully
finalized
on
sunday,
and
so
this
is
just
going
to
be
what
I'm
presenting
to
marco
and
then
marco
is
going
to
do
all
of
the
graphic
design
magic
to
make
it
beautiful.
D
D
D
D
D
D
So
on
this
one
here,
we've
got
percent
of
conviction
and
then
on
the
x-axis.
We've
got
time
right
so
amount
of
days,
and
so
they
can
see
you
know
at
20
in
20
days.
They'll
have
you
know,
70
conviction,
30
they'll,
be
at
80
conviction
and
then,
depending
on
where
they
put
the
slider,
the
graph
will
adjust.
D
Okay,
great
now,
this
is
where
it
gets
fun.
This
is
where
we
cooked
all
this
stuff
up
on
sunday,
and
this
is
where
we
really
need
some
idea
validation.
So
I
really
we
really
tried
to
boil
down
the
question
when
talking
about
minimum
conviction
and
what
does
the
user
actually
want
to
know?
What
do
they
actually
care
surrounding
this,
and
so
it's
like
they
want
to
know
how
many
tokens
are
needed
to
pass
proposal,
and
it's
like
how
do
we
present
that
information?
D
D
D
A
A
D
A
F
F
F
F
A
F
F
F
A
D
I
G
D
A
D
D
So
then,
this
is
the
other
one.
Here,
that's
gonna
kind
of
just
sum
it
all
up,
and
so
here
we
have
the
y-axis,
which
is
the
effective
supply,
and
then
the
x-axis
is
the
percent
of
common
pool
funds
that
are
being
requested
and
so
the
minimum,
the
minimum
conviction
or
maybe
griff.
If
I'm
wrong
about
this,
the
minimum.
D
Tokens
needed
to
pass
right
of
the
effect
of
supply
starts
here,
and
then
it
follows
the
graph
until
we
eventually
it
goes
to
the
asymptote
at
the
relative
spending
limit
right
and
then
we'll
have
like
radio
buttons
here
that
will
assume
that
they
want
to
pass
it
in
seven
days.
They
want
to
pass
it
in
two
weeks,
one
month,
three
months
six
months,
and
then
we
have
on
hover
here
what
percent
of
funds
they're
asking
and
how
much
of
the
effective
supply
needs
to
be
voting
on
this
proposal.
A
D
F
A
I
A
So
this
this
would
be
the
main
graph
that
people
see
that
combines
all
three
parameters
to
each
other.
The
first
parameter
that
you're
picking
is
the
relative
spending
limit.
The
second
parameter
that
you're
picking
is
basically
the
shape
of
this
curve.
Although
it's
shaped
in
a
different
way
when
you're
picking
it
and-
and
it's
like
the
slope
of
the
curve-
is
what
what
deter
is
determined
by
the
second
parameter
and
then
where
it
crosses.
The
y-axis
is
determined
by
the
third
parameter
that
you
choose,
and
then
you
get
this
graph.
F
F
D
A
D
So
in
this
scenario
you
know
we've
got
various
amounts
of
money
in
the
common
pool
and
various
levels
in
the
co
in
the
effective
supply
and
then
how
much
their
ass,
what
the
maximum
they
can
ask
the
amount
they're
actually
asking
for
and
then
the
amount
of
tokens
they
need
to
pass
it
in
x
amount
of
time,
and
so
you
know
here
in
the
graphs
we're
giving
them
a
lot
of
percents
and
then
down
in
the
tables.
We
can
give
them
something
more
concrete
to
help
them
understand.
It.
A
E
D
I
E
F
F
F
Onboarding
and
I
wanted
to
simplify
it,
the
most
so
we
are
also
selecting
three
parameters:
half
life,
migration
and
interdiscipline,
and
the
only
thing
that
it
needs
to
change
is
is
the
naming
of
those
parameters
internally.
They
are
called
this
way,
but
it
can
be
interesting
to
call
them
in
another
way
and
we
have
these
two
graphs.
F
So
this
is
exactly
the
the
first
graph
that
that
you
were
talking
about
how
conviction
is
accruing
over
time,
and
then
we
define
the
threshold
there's
amount
of
conviction,
but
in
in
the
document
that
we
you
you
have
shared.
This
is
not
amount
of
conviction.
This
is
amount
of.
It
is
percentage
of
tokens
over
time
right.
So
it
changes
a
little
bit.
We
will
not
have
this
line
here,
and
this
will
be
a
little
bit
different.
F
F
F
So
yeah,
basically
this
is
this
is
what
we
have
and-
and
maybe
it's
still
interesting
to
change,
also
for
gardens,
and
so
it
will
be
a
change
in
this
in
this
graph
here
I
will
suggest
that,
because
we
have
three
three
parameters,
we
have
three
graphs
one
for
each
and
then
we
have
here
the
amount
requested
that
it's
more
like
something
that
you
can
play
with,
and
I
I
don't
know
in
that
case.
Probably
it
would
not
be
needed
anymore
right
because
in
the
in
the
hackmd
you
were
not
using
the
requested
amount.
A
You
know
it
might
be.
We
haven't
gotten
to
the
very
end
right,
so
it
won't
be
needed
in
the
at
least
in
the
first
section,
but
I
wouldn't
remove
your
code
unless
it
gets
in
the
way
because,
like
we
haven't
done
the
the
final
page
or
maybe
there
will
be
more
calculators
and
more
like
ways
to
experience
the
the
whole
system
so
that
it
could
come
in
handy.
I
wouldn't
say
this
is
the
final
spec.
A
This
is
just
for
what
was
shown
was
like
the
section
where
they
pick
three
of
the
parameters
for
conviction
voting
and
we
give
them
the
deep
dive
into
conviction
and
voting.
You
know,
but
there's
going
to
be
so
there's
going
to
be
these
four
sections
and
then
there's
going
to
be
a
final
page.
So,
but
we
haven't
even
looked
at
the
final
page
yet
and
how
we
want
to
tie
it
all
together.
So
maybe
there'll
be
like
this
like.
Oh,
you
know
what,
if
you,
how
many,
how
much
x
die?
Would
it
take
to?
A
F
F
A
A
It
doesn't
have
the
it's,
not
a
fun
ui,
like
a
lot
of
you
know
for
the
developers
they
come
to
this
and
they're
like
yeah
cool,
you
know,
but
if,
if
I
throw
this,
you
know
into
the
general
chat
and
say:
hey
guys,
validate
our
our
design
and
they'll
be
like
this
doesn't
make
any
sense.
How
do
I
even
run
this
locally?
I
don't
know
if
you're
talking
about
anybody,
but
so
so
for
the
figma.
You
know
we'll
just
have
like
a
figma
prototype
where
they
they
can
touch
things
in
play
and
then
be
like.
A
F
A
F
F
A
F
F
A
A
D
You
know
in
kind
of
like
an
economic
sense,
but
also
from
like
giving
the
commons
time
to
establish
itself
sort
of
sense,
and
so
the
first
question
that
we
ask
them
is
that
what
price
should
we
set
the
tec
token
at
launch
of
the
commons,
and
then
we
just
give
them
a
basic
input
where
they
put
in
the
opening
price
in
xdi?
I
believe
for
the
tec
token,
after
that
we
asked
them.
How
long
should
the
tc
tokens
be
frozen?
To
maintain
a
price
floor?
D
D
And
then
how
long
should
it
take
for
100
of
the
hatcher's
tec
to
be
released
and
then
that'll
be
just
a
basic
input
for
the
token
thaw,
and
then,
after
that
we
have
an
output
here
of
a
table
just
to
visualize
it.
So
at
five
weeks
what
percent
of
tokens
are
released?
What's
the
price
floor
of
the
token
and
then
the
same
thing
here
shows
up
in
the
graph
where
we've
got
the
y-axis
is
the
price
floor
and
the
x-axis
is
the
amount
of
time.
That's
elapsed.
J
Yeah,
I
have
a
quick
question.
I
I
also
was
waiting
for
the
documentation.
I
was
just
curious.
I
think
it's
just
I
mean
it's
a
fairly
solid
plan,
but
I
thought
what
about
why?
Why
is
time
the
indicator
for
the
thought
and
not
the
market
movement
or
some
combination
thereof
right
because
you
might
want
to
if
the
price
is
holding
you
might
want
to
have
sort
of
a
metric
looking
at
both
time
and
price
if
the
floor
is
holding
to
accelerate
the
thaw
or
vice
versa.
A
A
This
is
a
technical
issue.
It's
just
really
difficult.
The
vesting
contracts
that
are
audited
and
available
all
are
focused
on
time,
but
I
completely
agree
we
had
in
the
original
common
sect
design.
It's
exactly
that
way
where
well
we're
also
using
a
few
other
kpis,
specifically
how
much
money
has
been
spent
out
of
the
common
pool
was
kind
of
the
the
idea.
So
it's
like
is
there
the
economy?
A
You
can't
really.
You
can't
release
all
of
your
tokens
until
you've
spent
this
much
money
on
the
common
pool,
which
might
be
maybe
four
times
the
amount
that
the
common
pool
spark
starts
with
right.
So
then,
the
your
tokens
aren't
released
until
the
economy
is
really
going
and
funding
funding
good
projects
was.
J
Yeah,
no,
I
get
it,
that's
really
cool.
I
mean
I
was
even
thinking
just
pool
size
because
it
depends
on
your
other
metrics
if
you're
setting
the
tributes
depending
what
you're
setting
money,
the
funds
are
coming
into
the
pool
as
well,
so
as
the
pool
grows
or
not,
that
would
basically
make
the
reserve
more
secure.
J
H
J
Something
to
be
a
token
engineering
contribution
of
the
broader
community,
so
those
two
dynamics
could
could
be
you're
right
like
a
fully
audited
code,
because
I
think,
there's
a
there's
a
value
to
like
maintaining
the
pool
as
the
funds
are
coming
in.
So
if
it's
a
big
rush,
the
pool
is
fairly
flush
and
if
your
exit
tribute
can
be
modeled
in
a
way
that
it
wouldn't
dramatically
or
it
would
even
increase.
A
G
G
On
the
first
question
you
we're
asking
about:
what's
the
price
we
want
for
the
tc
at
launch,
I
think
that's
not
real
one.
We
not
I
and
it's
something
that
we
were
also
discussing
yesterday
on
common
swarm.
It's
not
I
mean
I
mean
if
you're
asking
for
prices.
Why
not?
You
know
10
million
for
tokera-
and
you
know
like
the
scope,
is
not
in
the
right
place
because
for
asking
you
can
ask
whatever,
but
I
feel
it's
not.
I
don't
know
if.
A
But
if
you're
asking
for
maybe
you
just
say,
the
opening
price
is
the
same
as
the
hatch
price.
Well,
then,
you
can
probably
have
a
smaller
freeze
and
a
smaller
and
a
shorter
thaw,
because
there's
more
in
the
bonding
curve,
and
so
it's
a
it's
just
relevant
in
the
in
the
experience
of
the
vesting
contracts
to
have
that
set
in
it
before
and
it's
also
the
cool
thing
about
open
price
is.
This
is
like
for
the
people,
the
remember
the
people
who
are
voting
on
this
and
the
people
who
will
be
parameterizing.
A
This
will
have
already
paid
a
hatch
price,
and
so
it's
like
a
very
it's
it's
like
a
very
stick.
It's
a
very
clear
number.
They
know
what
the
impact
is
right,
hey.
What
open
price
do
you
want
to
use?
Well,
we
paid
one
wrapped
x
die
for
a
token,
and
so
let's
make
it
1.25
right
and
take
that
amount
of
profit,
and
then
you
know-
and
so
it's
like
this
really
easy.
First
question:
that
really
is
probably
one
of
the
main
things
that
they
will
want
to
design
around
is
their
individual
profits.
G
G
A
J
A
The
the
opening
price,
because
of
because
we
already
have
this,
is
all
done
post
hatch,
so
we
know
how
much
money
we've
raised.
We
know
how
many
tokens
exist
and
then-
and
then
we
in
in
a
later
in
the
next
parameter
for
the
bonding
curve,
we'll
pick
how
much
money
will
go
to
the
bonding
curve
and
with
that
then
we'll
have
a
ratio.
Then
we'll
know
how
the
bonding
curve
is
shaped,
but
the
higher
the
opening
price,
the
the
more
steep
the
curve
will
be.
J
A
J
Right
as
it
opens
yeah
right,
I
was
actually
wondering
why,
if
you
guys
thought
about
like
a
gnosis
auction
or
something
like
that
with
your
you
know,
from
the
even
setting
the
price.
Okay,
that's
one,
that's
one
question
and
then
once
you,
but
it's
actually,
the
auction
is
more
like
not
really
setting
the
price.
It's
sort
of
allowing.
A
A
D
You
want
to
plow
through
this
or
switch
to
something
else,
plow
through
plow
through
okay,
so
we're
going
right
into
the
augmented
bonding
curve,
and
so
we've
got
the
short
description
here
and
then
we
ask
them
what
percentage
of
the
hatch
fund
should
go
immediately
to
funding
tec
projects?
So
this
is
the
commons
tribute,
and
then
we
just
stole
something
from
the
common
simulator
very
similar,
and
then
talking
about
entry,
tribute
exit
tribute
what
percentage
every
buy
should
go
to
the
funding.
D
The
tec
entry
tribute
similar
thing
from
the
sell
orders
for
the
exit
tribute,
and
then
we've
got
this
tool
that
we
designed
here
that
is
going
to
be
for
testing
out
the
augmented
bonding
curve,
so
they
put
in
their
three
inputs
commons
tribute
entry
exit
tribute.
We
already
have
the
open
price
from
the
module
before,
because
this
is
going
to
be
happening
in
a
linear
order,
and
so
in
order
to
use
this
they're
going
to
choose
a
reserve
balance,
so
we're
going
to
give
them.
D
D
You
know
of
tec
that
they're
buying
or
selling,
and
then
they
can
basically
plot
the
different
steps
on
the
curve
and
then
we're
going
to
give
them
a
little
bit
of
information
here.
So
we're
going
to
say
the
price
that
they
were,
that
they
went
in
the
buy
amount
or
the
sell
amount,
and
then
the
new
price
after
the
order
has
been
executed
and
then
in
order
to
properly
set
up
kind
of
the
story
that
we
want
to
tell
we're
going
to
have
three
initial
steps.
D
It's
going
to
be
a
small,
buy,
a
larger,
buy
and
then
a
cell,
and
then
we'll
have
another
scenario
which
is
going
to
be
a
buy,
a
larger
cell
and
then
a
cell,
and
then
from
there
we're
going
to
allow
the
users
to
add
three
more
points
using
this
tool.
Above
that
they
can
understand,
what's
happening
on
the
curve.
But
then
they
can
also
experiment
with
it
themselves.
A
Just
to
clarify
these
are
the
outputs
and
it's
like
how
they
would
experience
the
curve.
So
it's
not
like
when
they're
choosing
those
reserve
ratios
and
stuff
those
are
those
are
just
so
that
they
can
zoom
in
on
on
the
shape
of
the
curve
in
a
given
spot.
It's
not
like
a
parameter
or
anything.
The
only
three
parameters
on
this
page
are
exit
tribute
entry
tribute
and
how
much
go
in
the
comments
tribute
yeah
exactly.
D
F
F
F
F
A
I
D
I
mean
it,
it's
cool,
I
think
you
hear
what
you're
saying,
because
it
was
very
complicated
to
come
up
with
this
as
an
idea,
and
then
it's
like
marco
made
a
good
point.
It's
like
do.
We
want
users
to
get
stuck
playing
with
this
or
just
give
them
what
they
need
to
know
and
then
move
on,
but
griff
also
made
a
good
point
of
like
adding
several
steps
like
at
least
three
to
show
what
happens
like
a
user
making
profit
or
a
user
losing
money.
A
Yeah,
that's
kind
of
like
okay.
So
what
what?
Because?
It's
really
about
tuning
the
exit,
tribute
and
entry
tribute
right,
so
you're
shaping
the
curve,
but
then
you're
also
tuning
the
entry
tribute
and
exit
tribute
so
to
give
people
the
experience
of
the
entry
tribute
exit
tribute.
The
general
concept
was
well.
If
I
buy
a
hundred
dollars
and
this
person
buys
a
thousand
dollars
and
then
I
sell,
do
I
even
make
a
profit
you
know
like.
Maybe
I
maybe
I
lose
money
because
of
the
exit
tributes.
C
K
D
F
A
F
F
You
can
also
visualize
very
clear
clearly
in
the
graph
how
the
the
tributes
affect
the
the
curve
of
the
price
it's
more
like
if
you
are
in
this
in
this
point,
when
you
try
to
sell
it's
it's
like
this,
and
when
you
try
to
buy
it's
like
this,
so
you,
if
the
the,
if
the
tributes
are
very
high,
the
curve
is
it's.
They
are
two
curves
that.
F
A
I
think
okay,
so
we're
we're
out
of
time.
You
know
some
sem
made.
An
awesome
did
a
lot
of
work
on
the
bonding
curve
stuff.
I'm
really
sorry
that
you
don't
get
to
share
it,
and
this
called
we
went.
We
went
over
on
time,
but
it's
super
cool
and
we'll
have
to
have
the
reserve
ratio
versus
open
price
debate
some
other
time.
I
do
want
to
just
give
a
nod
to
the
to.
A
I
need
to
take
this
quick
moment
just
to
share
screen
and
say
the
great
work
that's
been
happening
on
the
forum
post
looks
like
lauren
has
a
few
forum
posts
that
are
ready
for
review.
If
people
want
to
check
them
out
I've,
I
moved
them
down
to
the
advanced
parameters
section
because
that's
where
they're
going
to
be
also
I'm
I'm
kind
of
working
on
this
default
params
to
figure
out
some
of
these
guardians
default
params.
That
really
will
just
confuse
people
and
then
maybe
nate.
Do
you
have
any?
K
A
A
E
G
G
A
Cool
so
check
this
doc.
This
is
our
doc
for
managing
the
forum
post
work
put
links
in
if
it
for
so
you
can
share
your
progress
and
that
way
we
don't
duplicate
work
hard
in
these
decentralized
communities,
not
to
duplicate
work
so
like.
Let's
try
to
use
this
awesome
outline
that
that
nate
put
together
so
that
we
can
coordinate
around
it
and
is
there
any
oh
and
there's
this
power
of
defaults
post
that
I'm
still
working
on.
B
A
I
know
man
and
I
and
really
what
I'm
really
disappointed
at-
is
that
we're
gonna
skip
out
on
this
opportunity
to
really
educate
our
community
about
how
these
daos
are
governed
by
the
god
mode,
which
is
disputable
voting.
You
know
like
we're,
basically
cutting
that
scope
and
it
it's
deeply
saddens
me
that
people
will
not
understand
how
these
doubt.
A
F
A
This
is
this
is
what
sem
did
to
bait
me
into
this
horrible
situation,
we'll
just
have
to
add
an
extra
another
disputable
voting
app
later
and
do
the
permissions
stuff
and
educate
our
community
post
commons
upgrade
for
that
and
a
few
other
things
that
we
would
like
to
be
more
complicated.
But,
okay,.