►
Description
The Parameters Working Group deployed the dashboard for the Hatch and is now working on the dashboard for the Commons Upgrade. The goal is to get the community involved with as many technical decisions as possible to get a healthy TE Commons off the ground!
We gather every Tuesday at 5 pm CET.
Steward: Griff
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
I'm
sorry
for
being
a
little
bit
late
here,
intentions,
distractions:
my
intentions
are
to
go
through
the
board
figure
out
what
we
got
to
do
to
finish
this
thing
and
get
it
out
this
thursday,
hopefully
or
check
in
on
that
and
make
sure
that's
actually
really
possible,
and-
and
I
think
that's
it-
you
know
that's
if
there's
a
demo
or
something
that
would
be
cool
as
far
as
distractions.
A
B
Gm
my
intentions
for
this
call
is
to
see
the
latest
updates
and
any
issues
that
we
need
to
solve,
bugs
all
that
good
stuff
and
maybe
talk
about
when
we
can
start
doing
some
legit
pram
parties
and
other
than
that,
nothing
else
I'll
pass
it
to
noggin.
C
Hey
yeah,
well
intentions,
just
sync
up
and
maybe
use
the
chance
that
to
kind
of
on
the
stuff-
that's
maybe
just
not
working
right
now
with
vitor
and
pedro,
just
to
get
make
sure
that
that
we
pinpoint
the
issue
and
distractions
not
much.
I
have
my
girlfriend
running
around
ordering
some
stuff,
but
apart
from
that,
oh
it's
good
and
I'll
pass.
The
tour.
D
Hey
guys,
yeah,
my
intentions
are
to
sync
up
like
what
is
left
to
do
so
we
can
think
on
when
we
can
watch
it
and
play
with
it
and
yeah
I
just
launched,
so
I'm
a
little
bit
out
of
focus,
but
I
promise
we'll
be
focused
on
it
and
I'll
pass.
The
bedroom.
E
F
Hey
guys
yeah,
my
intentions
today
are
just
to
sync
up:
hang
out
look
at
the
dashboard,
and
maybe
some
issues,
but
mostly
just
see
where
we're
at
not
very
distracted,
just
distracted
by
like
give
us
twitter
how
fast
it
is
zappy.
H
Hi
good
morning,
my
intentions
are
to
sync
up
see
where
we're
at
try
to
get
my
head
back
into
the
game
and
my
distractions
are
I'm
drinking
coffee,
so
not
many
distractions
and
I
don't
know
who's
gone
but
griff,
I'm
gonna!
Guess
that
nobody's
passed
it
to
you
yet
because
you
get
left
out.
A
This
time
I
get
to,
I
got
to
start
it.
So,
oh.
I
Thanks
chris
yeah,
I'm
happy
to
be
back.
I
was
ill
for
a
week,
I'm
not
a
deserter
okay,
I
couldn't
work,
but
I'm
back
to
work,
and
I'm
just
here
to
to
see
what
I
can
help
with.
I
have
some
ideas
on
how
to
improve
the
learning
modules
and
yeah.
That's
it
no
distraction
and
I'll
pass
back
to
you.
A
Well,
I
and
I
I'll
add
one
more
thing
that
if
we
have
bonus
time
talking
using
the
conviction,
voting
module
yesterday
and
actually
in
this
brand
id
call,
I
had
just
a
second
ago.
There
were
lots
of
suggestions
for
improvements
in
the
conviction,
voting
module,
but
none
of
them
were
like
things
we
have
to
do.
Oh,
let
me
share
a
screen.
Let's
start
by
going
to
the
board.
D
Before
we
do
that,
just
one
quick
thing
that
I
think
we
can
do
like,
since
we
were
expecting
to
launch
it
as
soon
as
possible.
I
think
we
could
like
just
split
things
into
things
that
are
nice
to
have,
and
things
are
like
high
priority
for
launching
because,
like
I
think
we
should
like
close
with
you,
which
features
you
want
and
then
just
look
for
like
make
sure
that
everything
is
working.
Fine
and
I
think
we're
already
we're
doing
this
in
the
high
priority.
D
But
then
I
think,
if
you
keep
this
consistent,
we
can
finish
it
fast.
A
A
If
that
sounds
good,
but
man,
it
looks
like
you
guys
slaughtered
the
issues,
but
are
they
all
up
on
what
what's
the
current
status
of
like
things
going
to
master
like?
Are
they
up
on
the
main
net?
Lfi
branch
of
the
issue
closed.
D
Like
in
the
back
end,
we're
doing
we're
standing
up
to
the
development
branch
and
actually
they
deployed
it
to
having
amplify
is
the
development
branch,
because
there
are
a
few
things
that
are
breaking
so
it's
like.
When
it
gets
fully
running
smoothly,
then
you
can
merge
to
main
but
you're
using
that
main
metallify
link
as
well,
which
is
broken
now,
because
I
just
made
a
little
mistake
of
not
testing
one
thing
in
the
back
end,
but
we
already
found
the
the
issue.
I
think
it
was
talking
about
that.
A
Okay,
cool,
that's
cool!
Well
then,
let's
start
by
celebrating
all
these
guns,
my
god,
so
we
got
the.
We
got
the
font
sizes
fixed
nice.
That
was
you
mitch
right,
yeah,
nice
work.
Buddy!
Is
this
really
all
the
issues,
though,
let's
see
add
fork
for
lots
of
merges?
A
We
got
the
learn
more
pop-ups
fixed
nice.
Oh,
we
made
the
reserve
ratio
more
prominent,
nice,
oh
yeah.
Oh
that
looks
good,
okay
and
so
pedro.
You
got
that
actually
up
on
the
is
that
on
the
develop
branch.
B
Yeah
and
just
just
a
heads
up,
I
changed
some
of
that
text
on
there
in
the
formatting.
So
if
anyone's
reading
it-
and
I
think
that's
on
develop
actually
so.
A
A
Lauren
has
a
thing
for
tool:
tips:
man,
that's
for
sure.
Is
it
possible
to
move
this
up
a
little
bit?
It
looks
kind
of
weird
in
this
spot.
Do
you
guys
think
so
or
no
I
mean
I
think
it's
okay,
but.
G
A
B
A
Right
cool
not
a
priority.
Okay
anyway,
I
probably
move
this
tool
tip
that
blocks
the
stevie
chart
nice.
Thank
you
for
fixing
that
pedro
fixing
the
headers
yeah
pedro
man
you're
just
killing.
It
look
at
adding
a
question
mark
to
everything.
A
Oh
nice,
that's
fixed!
That's
great!
A
A
Let's
see,
add
total
supply
as
a
column
in
the
abc
module
and
delete
current
and
collected.
This
is
waiting
for
review
or
something.
E
So
the
review
tag
that
I
added
is
like.
We
made
a
change,
but
we
still
don't.
We
still
don't
know
if
this
is
going
to
be
definite.
The
final
version
you
know
so
it's
the
review
tag
is
so
just
to
us
remember
if
we
have
to
change
again
of
off.
This
will
be
the
final
decision
or
some
fla.
Something
like
that,
because
actually
mitch
thought
that
maybe
removing
the
collected
from
tribute
collected
could
cause
confusion
on
the
users.
E
So
we
are
waiting
for
some
user
feedback.
A
C
B
A
I
think
I
think
this.
This
is
definitely
something
we
don't
bother
fixing
this
week,
but
it's
it's
something
to
look
for
I'll.
Just
add
that
to
this.
A
D
A
Great
add
design,
graphics
to
intro
and
learn
modules.
D
A
Yeah,
I
can
still
I
can
meters
popping
in
and
out,
okay,
okay,
so
this
this
is,
I'm
just
gonna
move
this
to
product
backlog,
because
it's
definitely
not
a
blocker
for
launch.
A
This
is
fresh,
yeah,
okay,
cool.
I
do
think
it
would
be.
Quite
the
nice
touch
to
get
those
those
audios
up.
Sorry
mount
manu.
You
were,
you
were
gone
for
this,
but
lauren
actually
recorded
all
these
things
and
and
and
put
them
up.
A
Had
to
be
done,
praise
praise,
lauren,
praise
marco
praise
match
and
thank
you
pedro
for
taking
it
on
okay.
So
we
did
that
one
and
now
there's
some
new
issues.
Let's
see
so
initial
buy
and
hatch
a
rage.
Car
are
not
factored
in
the
abc
module,
but
I
obviously
we
know
this
one
is
it?
Is
this
a
front
end
issue
or
a
back
end
issue?
Do
you
tag
pablo.
C
A
E
A
No,
no,
it
still
doesn't
seem
like
it's
being
subtracted
from
the
total
amount
for
this
launch
button.
At
least.
E
I
have
just
uploaded
that
the
code
that
to
do
that
subtraction
a
little
time
ago,
let
me
see
if
I
just
put
on
the
oh,
it's
on
the
develop
yet.
Okay,
sorry,
all
right!
Okay,.
A
Do
you
guys
have
time
for
that?
Do
you
guys
have
a
link
for
that
develop,
maybe
throw
it
in
params,
and
we
can.
I
can
try
it
on
the
next
issue
as
well.
A
A
Okay,
opening
price
entry
tribute
changes,
do
not
update
the
table;
okay,
cool,
also
in
review
and
also
fixed.
It
looks
like,
but
so
so
I
guess
we're
looking
for
a
uv
tour
to
review
a
pr
is
that
the
is.
D
E
J
That's
much
better
the
the
zero
step
I
have
another.
E
A
A
C
Yeah,
I
I
just
it's.
I
think
it
sends
before
you
finish
typing.
So
when
you
finish
typing
what's
arriving
is
the
the
answer
before
you
finished,
so
it
takes
just
seconds
to
use
the
last
number.
So
maybe
that's
that.
A
Okay,
so
I
would
say
this
is
looking
great
and
then
we
can
close
it
do
you
feel
like
it
needs
more
review
pedro.
K
D
A
A
C
A
A
Okay,
remove
minimum
tokens
needed
to
pass.
A
E
D
On
that
today,
actually
like,
I
think
it's
because
of
that,
and
that
I
will
just
remove
it
from
the
line,
because
then
I
think
it's
better,
because
if
we
decide
to
add
again
just
head
back
to
the
back
end,
just
like
online
okay,
yeah,
then
I'll
do
this
with
the
not
possible.
So
in
the
same
request.
A
Okay,
so
this
is
a
weird
one.
I
think
it's
actually
yeah.
It
was
just
that
with
a
high
conviction,
growth
and
minimum
conviction.
A
It's
just
weird
that
you
might
have
like
a
spending
limit
of
10.4
and
you
don't
see
the
full
10
here.
It
makes
you
it.
It
feels
like
it's
broken,
even
though
it's
not,
I
would
definitely
say
this
is
a
low
priority
issue,
but
I'm
curious
what
you
guys.
Thoughts
are
yeah
like.
D
But
we
can
do
any
logic
on
that
and
the
the
point
was
just
that,
like
probably
when
you
do
like
10.45,
it
gets
closer
to
80
percent,
and
then
it
just
adds
more
so
like.
What
would
you
like
to
be?
The
logic
can
do
anything?
Basically
you
like,
if
you
add
this
panel,
you
want
to
add,
like
the
at
least
like
a
max
value
in
the
x-axis
higher
than
the
spending
limit.
You
can
do
that
like
if
you
say
like
spending.
D
A
A
Unless
mitch
or
lauren
or
anyone
else
feels
like
strongly
to
not
put
that
in
the
icebox.
But.
B
Really
stretch
enough,
I
mean
like
because
we
were
playing
with
like
the
one
hive
tool
yesterday
or
the
gardens
tool.
It
was
really
nice
because
you
could
actually
kind
of
like
visualize
the
fact
that
the
spending
limit
is
basically
unattainable.
Like
you
see
it
goes
parabolic
and
then
it
goes
almost
parallel.
The
curve
with
the
the
spending
limit
right,
that
line
being
the
spending
limit,
and
so
it's
like
part
of
the
point
of
making
that
specific
graph
was
being
able
to
visualize
the
spending
limit
in
relation
with
the
rest
of
the
parameters.
D
In
the
in
in
the
initial
chart,
where
we
did
with
the
other
two,
we
added
the
we
added
the
the
dashed
line
with
the
spanning
limit.
But
I
think
we
had
the
limitation
of
this
library,
but
we
can
like
at
least
in
the
back,
and
you
can
add
that,
but
I
think
it's
more
fun
than
they
should
not
have
been
able
to
try
it
right
now
or
not.
B
It's
just
like
it
doesn't
quite
tell
the
whole
story
because
it
like
it
cuts
off
before.
Really
you
see
that
massive
shift
in
direction
you
know
like
you,
can
extrapolate
that,
because,
if
you're
looking
at
the
curve-
but
you
don't
actually
see
it
where
it
goes
like
almost
vertical
or
basically
vertical,.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Do
you
think
that
we
should
extend
it
mitch
or
just?
Is
it
fine.
B
B
A
A
B
B
D
Right
like
inside,
if
you
set
a
minimum
conviction
to
zero,
it
will
like
do
that.
But
if
you
add
the
minimum
conviction
you
like
offset
it,
so
I
think
that's
more
because
of
the
minimum
conviction
and
then
like
you,
could
we
can
just
instead
of
doing
that,
just
change
the
x's
like,
for
example,
to
change.
B
D
No
yeah
I
get
but,
like
you,
gotta,
think
this
in
a
generalized
way
and
like
it
will
be
like
which
value
like
will
be.
If
it
goes
up
to
the
you
can
be
go
up
to
the
spending
limit
value
and
you
will
not
like
reach
that
so
we'll
have
a
space
breathe
as
well.
E
G
D
Like
the,
I
don't
think,
that's
a
good
idea,
because
the
back
end
is
any
other
data
and
like
if
we,
I
assure
you
that
if
we
set
it
to
just
the
spending
limit,
it
will
have
like
a
space
to
breathe
and
we
can
add
like
plus
one
or
something
like
that.
But
I
think
we
should
add
this
to
the
like.
If
you
send
change
adjustment
connection,
to
like
two
five,
for
example,.
D
You
will
offset
things
and
yeah,
then
this
happens
but
like
if
you
go
back
to
zero
and
the
minimum
conviction,
for
example,
then
your
x-axis
will
be
your
minimum
convection
to
zero,
for
example.
Then
no,
no,
your
minimum
connection
to
zero
percent
and
then
your
x-axis
will
be
will
be
in
the
actual
site.
A
A
You
know
what
is
10
weeks
50
weeks,
100
weeks
like
that
doesn't
mean
the
only
one
that
makes
sense
is
260
weeks,
which
is
five
years,
but
it's
like
hard
to
really
understand
what
they
mean,
and
so
the
idea
is
to
add
a
little
bit
more
at
the
front
because,
like
you
know
it's
like
okay,
we
get
three
values.
A
You
know,
I
don't
know
it's
just
a
little
weird
and
also
make
them
human
readable.
So
it's
like
three
months
six
months,
nine
months
a
year,
one
and
a
half
years,
two
years,
three
years,
four
years,
five
years
and
in
a
in
a
dream
world
we
wouldn't
show
like.
If
the
vesting
is
only
one
and
a
half
years,
we'd
show
two
years
zero
percent,
and
then
we
wouldn't
show
three
four
five.
Basically
we'd
only
show
zero.
The
first
zero,
but
that's
definitely
bonus
points.
D
D
Just
understand
where,
like
if
we're
planning
to
to
launch
things
on
on
thursday,
I'd
like
to
focus
on
you
know,
it's
like
hard
priority,
because
yeah
yeah,
especially
trying
to
get
things
working,
yeah.
D
A
A
Cool
and
mitch,
I
don't
know
if
you're
interested,
but
you
could
you
could
review
if
you
think
it's
if
it's
cool.
A
Well,
I
mean
when
yeah
just
like
in
in
this
issue
36,
I
remade
the
issue
to
move
some
things
around
specifically,
I
moved
the
summary
to
the
top.
A
Bolded
this
I
don't
know
it
was
already
bolded,
but
I
took
out
the
words
so
that
it's
just
the
text
added
this
table
added
a
fork,
this
proposal,
so
that
they
could
see.
I
loved
your
we're
very
bullish
on
the
tec,
so
you
know
we're
only
showing
the
buy
modules.
Oh.
A
I
I
I
I
toned
it
down
just
a
little
and
and
encouraged
people
to
see
the
other
to
explore
the
bonding
curve
more
by
actually
like
loading
in
into
their
thing.
Oh
yeah,
actually
yeah.
A
Okay,
cool
vtor:
this
is
true
right
with
the
local
storage
that,
if,
if
someone
clicks
forks,
this
proposal
it'll
clear
whatever
they
had
stored
in
there
for
their
settings
at
that
moment,.
E
Yeah,
this
is
the
way
that
I'm
currently
implementing
implementing
it.
So
if
you
try
to
fork
an
issue
from
the
github
you
you
lose
these
strategies
that
you
type
it
earlier.
A
E
Okay,
another
thing
that
I'm
currently
doing
is
that
when
you
send
a
submit
proposal
and
everything
goes
well,
you're
going
to
be
redirected
for
the
config
module
one
and
all
the
parameters
and
strategies
that
you
type
it
for
this
proposal
for
the
proposal
that
you
submitted
will
be
erased.
Okay,
because
currently,
if
you
already
made
one
submission,
you
always
be
able
to
go
directly
to
the
submission
page
without
going
between
models.
You
know
the
submit
proposal.
Button
will
always
be
available
to
be
clicked.
A
A
Yeah
man,
it
is,
I
understand
why
you'd
want
to
do
that
right.
So
people
know
that
they
submitted.
E
Yeah,
it's
not
only
for
that,
but
imagine
that
you
submit
proposal.
Then
you
go
to
the
module
one
and
you
change
all
the
parameters
and
then
you
go
to
the
submission
page
and
all
the
strategies
that
you
typed
before
is
there
and
then,
and
I
feel
that
it
could
be
a
little
bit
confusing
for
the
user.
You
know
so
he
has
new
parameters
but
he's
looking
to
his
older
strategy
and
then
everything
is
mixing
up.
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
good
user
experience.
E
A
C
Okay,
I
have
another
question
about
the
issue
template
because
once
we
talked
about
adding
a
tape
with
price
milestones
for
the
curve,
so
when
the
balance
is
two
million,
the
price
is
this,
and
if
the
balance
is
what
I
don't
know,
how
much
the
price
is
that
do
we
still
want
to
do
that
or
can
I.
C
A
A
A
C
A
How
no
yeah
yeah
that's
true!
Well,
no,
but
if
it
goes
into
the
issue,
it
should
be
in
everybody's
issue
when
they
submit.
So
I
would,
I
would
put
it
in
the
sprint
backlog
honestly,
because
you
don't
want
people's
issued
like
the
issue.
Template
is,
should
be
the
same
for
everybody.
A
D
A
A
C
D
A
D
D
I
don't
need
another
method
just
for
wrapping
it
again
like
I
was
I'm
thinking,
I'm
doing
this
for
some
tables
there,
like
you,
just
get
a
specific
value
in
your
table
and
then
I
think
we,
if
we
could
do
this
today,
then
I
can
implement
the
issue
generator.
I
think
that's
yeah,
that's
more
reasonable,
because.
C
Okay,
yeah
great
yeah.
A
Okay,
sweet
cool
thanks
now
again,
good
call,
subtract
rage,
quit
and
initial
buy
from
launch
scenario
balance.
I
believe
this
one
is
finished
right.
A
Now
this
is
done
right.
Yes,
yes,
yes,
thank
you
pedro,
okay!
Well,
that's
that's
all
of
our
issues.
Vitor
did
you
have
any
final
thoughts
here.
A
D
Yeah,
like
I'm
just
a
bit
worried
about
the
abc,
because
it's
quite
complex,
I
think
that's
that's,
really
complex
and
I'm
just
worried
that
there
is
some
point
in
there
that
breaks,
so
I
will
be
going
to
the
path
of
not
adding
that
much
and
trying
to
get
sure
that
it
doesn't
break
at
any
point.
It's
consistency
so
but
other
than
that,
and
I
think
that
we
adding
this
it's
it's
okay
for
for
making
different
parts
like.
D
I
would
just
like
it
sure
that
the
or
just
like,
if
like
one
day
for
for
testing
the
abc
and
get
sure
that,
like
nothing,
nothing
is
wrong
the
same
for
the
others,
but
I
think
dbc
is
more
critical.
The
others
are
like
not
having
that
many
problems
because
they're
not
that
complex,
so
yeah.
D
I
think
I
think
I
think
the
features
that
we
have
here
are
enough
like
for
making
working
fine,
just
like
keep
like
probably
thursday
morning
or
like
wednesday
evening,
just
to
test
abc,
make
sure
that
it's
all
working
fine.
A
Okay,
great
well,
I
have
some
okay.
So
then
I
guess,
let
me
make
sure
there's
nothing
else
on
the
agenda.
Oh
yeah!
So
when
param
party
sir
friday,
do
we
we
presented
on
thursday
or
you
know
we
could
do-
we
could
do
one
thursday
night
or
or
should
we
just
set
it
for
friday,
so
we
have
a
little
bit
buffer
after
the
community
call.
If
something
goes
wrong.
A
Sounds
good
sounds
good.
We
can
also
wait
till
sunday.
D
B
B
A
Okay,
well,
then,
first
param
party
will
be
friday,
I'll
I'll
set
the
set
a
calendar
event
and
if
you
guys
can
make
it
cool,
if
not
we'll,
just
see
how
it
goes.
So,
that's
exciting.