►
From YouTube: W18 Parameters WG:Our economy, our choice!
Description
The Parameters Working Group deployed the dashboard for the Hatch and is now working on the dashboard for the Commons Upgrade. The goal is to get the community involved with as many technical decisions as possible to get a healthy TE Commons off the ground!
We gather every Tuesday at 5 pm CET.
Steward: Griff
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Attractions,
I'm
very
distracted
because
I'm
a
you
know.
I
found
myself
stuck
at
a
hookah
bar
or
like
trying
to
trying
to
get
internet
and
nothing
was
there.
It
was
like
my
phone
was
dying.
I
just
had
to
dip
into
the
closest
restaurant
or
something
that
I
could
find
and
they
had
power,
and
now
I'm
smoking,
hookah,
okay,
so
that'll
be
a
fun
call
and
as
far
as
intentions,
yeah
just
always
fun
to
check
in
with
marco
see
the
latest
from
vtor
and
I'll
see
what
you
guys
are
working
on.
A
B
Yeah
just
to
check
in
I'm
a
little
bit
distracted
because
I'm
just
going
to
try
to
make
a
tweet
forgiveth,
and
so
I'm
like
trying
to
think
in
spanish,
because
mateo
was
like
representing
us
in
spanish
yesterday
anyway.
I'm
just
distracted
by
that
but
it'll
just
take
me
a
second
and
then
I'll
be
fully
present
and
I'll
pass
it
to
me.
C
Thanks
no
distractions,
nothing
to
present,
maybe
just
get
some
consensus
between
design
and
development
and
figure
out
what
else
that
needs
to
be
figured
out
and
I'll
give
it
to
nuggen.
D
E
Thank
you.
My
intention
is
to
to
have
mitch
demo.
The
latest
thing
that
we've
done
with
the
abc
and
like
just
show
you
that
guys
get
some
early
feedback,
basically
just
validate
what
we
discussed
on
our
last
call,
and
we
just
you
know,
added
those
changes
and
prototyped
that
so
yeah.
But
that's
my
intention,
distractions.
E
No,
I'm
alone
in
this
room,
kids
are
outside
in
school.
So
it's
good
and
yeah
and
pass
it
over
to
ashley.
F
Oh,
my
intention
is
just
to
listen
in
and
just
be
here
and
it's
a
call
that
I've
never
joined
before.
So
I
just
want
to
listen
and
see
if
there's
a
way
I
can
get
involved.
I
have
a
couple
distractions,
I'm
visiting
my
family
right
now,
but
yeah,
I'm
I'm
mostly
just
listening
and
I
don't
know
who
has
already
gone
or
who
hasn't
so.
Have
you
gone
yeah
thank.
G
E
H
I
think
yeah,
can
you
guys
hear
me
all?
Oh
okay,
okay,
yeah
so
are
intentionally
give
a
little
bit
of
update
in
the
brands
of
work
and
see
about
what?
What
are
the
next
steps
and
check
out
how
it's
going
about
design
and
the
other
reports
as
well
and.
H
A
Wow
that
was
fast,
okay.
Well
then,
let's
start
with,
I
got
back
from
mount
manu.
He
said
he
didn't
have
any
user
testing
this
week
and
had
no
updates.
So
that's
not
a
gender
point.
Let's
go
mitch.
Did
you
have
well
mitch?
You
want
to
start
with
the
demo
that
marco
did.
I
assume
this
is
the
same
that
we
did
on
sunday.
E
C
I
just
marked
up,
maybe
to
you,
marco.
I
just
marked
up
that
original,
like
tutorial
thing
that
we
were
trying
to
build
on,
so
they
just
click
through
a
couple
screens,
and
then
it
says:
okay,
do
this
part
here
and
do
this
part
there,
so
that's
mucked
up,
I
ended
up
just
having
to
like
make
it
happen
with
buttons,
instead
of
like
being
able
to
click
it
on
the
screen.
A
He
didn't
make
a
comment,
but
during
the
access
she
was
saying
that
it's
difficult.
We
can't
do
the
hover
over
the
over
the
surface
area.
We
can't
do
any
like
pop-up
when
someone
moves
to
the
mouse
over
the
graph,
and
so
there
was
a
suggestion
of
that.
Little
box
that
pops
up
that
has
the
numbers
for
the
buy
in
the
cell
that
pop
up
when
people
scroll
over
the
the
numbers
or.
C
A
I
my
understanding
was
that
he
was
like
it's
not
possible
with
the
library
we're
using
so
we'd
have
to
change
libraries.
I
don't
know
vitor
if
that
makes
sense
to
you,
I'm
kind
of
talking
out
of
my
ass
of
what
I
heard
on
sunday.
So
no.
H
No
but
yeah
yeah
that
that's
the
point
I
think,
like
you
were
taking
the
approach
to
do
like
the
what
is
possible
with
the
library
like
right
now
and
to
have
like
all
the
the
modules
working
and
then
like
we
had
other
features.
So
I
think
that
I
think
that
was
his
point
like
maybe
prioritizing
like
having
it
working
and
then
adding
sex
extra
features
but
like
because,
if
we
have
to
change
library,
you
take
probably
take
a
bit
longer
but
yeah.
H
C
H
Yeah,
I
think
that
that's
a
good
solution,
but
I'm
really
not
that
sure,
because,
like
he's
handling
more
different
and
haven't
discussed
like
this
specific
thing,
but
I
think
we
can
like
tomorrow
come
tomorrow,
come
up
with
some
solution,
that's
possible,
and
then
you
know,
I
think,
because
like
without
him
here
I
can.
You
know
like
give
you
a
story
about
it.
C
E
Okay,
thanks
mitch,
so
I
just
that's
great,
so
we
kind
of
want
to
have
like
a
a
quick
tour
of
the
ui
and
also
like
tell
the
user
where
to
go
first
and
what
to
do
next.
So
I
think
like
in
the
front
end,
I'm
not
sure
fabio
is
on
the
call,
not
probably
not
going
to
call
right
but
like
vitor
or
maybe
I
can
tell
you
another
as
well.
So
I
think
that
there
are
some
libraries
or
frameworks
we
can
use
for
doing
like
these
two
ui
tours.
E
I
think
I
I
saw
that
somewhere.
I'm
not
sure
you
guys
may
be
more
familiar
with
that
where
you,
where
you
kind
of
like
when
you
land
on
a
new
on
a
new
product,
you
basically
get
a
quick
tour
of
like
you
know
how
to
navigate
through
the
ui
and
what
to
do
next
so
like.
E
I
don't
think
we
need
to
custom
design
that
I
think
you
guys
can
implement
this
out
of
the
box
from
somewhere,
and
so
the
idea
here,
I
I
guess
mitch
as
well
was
yours
to
kind
of
you
know,
bring
an
overlay
of
like
of
the
whole
ui
and
maybe
just
highlight
the
area
that
you're
talking
about
currently
and
then
have
user
to
click
like
next
next
next
to
get
them
familiar
to
with
the
ui.
E
I'm
sure
you've
seen
that
many
times
on
onboarding
to
new
products
whatever
when
you
sign
up
and
then
like
you
know,
they
give
you
a
quick
tour
and
you
can
skip
that.
Always
so.
Do
you
avitor?
Do
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about
or
a
nugget.
D
H
Yeah
and
also
yeah,
I
think
fabio
did
something
that
wasn't
the
same
thing
but
usually
like
to
do
that
kind
of
insecuran
thing
become
a
simulator
and
I
think
we
can
do
like.
I
think
you
can
add
libraries
like
that.
But
probably
what
you
can
do
is
maybe
like
talk
to
them
tomorrow
and
still
like
if
they
can
estimate
like
how
long
you
take
to
implement
that
yeah.
E
Yeah,
I
think
it's
a
pure
front-end
thing,
where
you
just
like
slap
that
now
like
on
top
of
everything
and
it
shouldn't
kind
of
interfere
with.
You
know,
whatever
we
like
have
that
on
the
screen.
So
basically
it
just
gives
you
a
tour
anyway,
like
ask:
ask
fabio
please
and
then
like
he
may
know
better,
but
but
the
idea
with
this
kind
of
tour
is
just
to
give
them
a
quick
worry
of
the
ui,
with
these
three
four
things
that
mitch
just
highlighted
here.
E
Ideally,
it
should
kind
of
like
dim
out
the
whole
ui
and
just
highlight
that
area
with
an
option
to
like
click
next
or
skip
the
tour,
or
something
like
that
so
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
comment.
C
Cool
and
while
we're
looking
at
the
bonding
curve,
you
guys
can
see,
I
just
added
an
extra
button
there.
Following
up
the
thing
on
sunday,
it
says:
launch
that's
going
to
be
like
the
hatch
funds
raised,
adjusted
by
the
commons
tribute
to
get
the
actual
reserve
balance,
and
the
second
thing
I
wanted
to
talk
about
was
marco
brought
up
on
our
session.
E
I
was,
I
was
actually
referring
to
to
the
link
that
vitor
deployed
where
he
tested
the
bombing
curve
where
we
actually
have
this
in
the
ui.
We
can
zoom
in
zoo
out
and
stuff
like
that.
So
I
was
thinking
like
I'm
not
sure
if
we're
going
to
have
this
here,
because
it
might
be
useful.
Actually,
when
there
are
many,
you
know,
steps
closed
next
to
each
other,
but
I
assume
like
instead
of
putting
that
on
the
screen,
maybe
or
I
don't
know-
maybe
we're
going
to
have
like
a
small.
E
You
know
zoom
plus
minus
icons.
If
you
guys
need
that
or
we
can
just
like
when
user
hovers
over
a
certain
area,
it
turns
into
like
zoom,
plus
icon
or
whatever
you
can
zoom
in
there.
I
don't
know
but
yeah
anyway.
We
just
talked
about
it
and
something
to
think
about.
If
we're
gonna
have
that.
D
Yeah,
I
I
did
this
this
zoom
in
part.
I
was
thinking
when
I
made
it
more
like
a
little
button
where
you
can
just
click
and
it
zooms
in
what
it
basically
what
it
does.
It
takes
the
first
step
and
the
last
step
on
the
sides
and
draws
the
line
just
a
bit
before
and
a
bit
after,
so
to
kind
of
just
zooms
in
it.
D
Just
it's
not
thought
to
be
to
highlight
like
like
two
steps
or
it's
just
to
take
the
hole
and
take
the
maximum
the
minimum
and
show
a
bit
on
both
sides.
It
can
be
changed
if
we
want
to
go
that
way,
but
just
to
explain
what
what
it,
how
I
thought
of
it.
E
So
so
you're
saying
we,
you
would
like
to
have
like
two
buttons
on
the
on
the
chart
somewhere
at
the
top
or
somewhere
to
zoom
in
and
out.
D
Yes
or
just
a
toggle,
if,
if
we
want,
if
we
want
to,
if
no,
we
can
just
say,
send
a
zero
and
it
doesn't
do
anything.
It
just
shows
that
shows
the
curve,
but
I
implemented
it
for
for
the
case
that
you
know
there
were
small
steps
which
just
can't
be
seen
from
from
far
away.
E
Yeah
well
referring
to
the
current
deployed
version
from
wheat
or
where
I
I
saw
them
at
the
top
of
the
plus
minus
buttons.
You
guys
can
just
you
know,
go
ahead
like
thumbs
up
for
me
to
put
them
up
there
and
then
like
let's
test
it
out
and
see
how
it
works.
A
Cool
mitch,
you
had
a
you
also
mentioned
that
there
was
some
things
that
you
wanted
to
do
between
like
consensus
on
design
and
development.
C
C
Of
issues
on
the
github,
so
some
of
it's
just
like
adding
buttons-
you
know,
like
I
confirmed
some
stuff
from
marco
and
making
sure
that
the
developers
see
it,
and
I
think
the
best
way
at
this
point
is
going
to
be
github
issues.
If
I'm
wrong.
H
No
yeah,
I
think,
like
you
mean
about
the
intro
learn
section
or
the
other
ones,.
C
H
No
yeah,
I
think
it
makes
sense
like
I
think
it's
awesome,
didn't,
make
it
and
help
a
lot
like
the
five
and
better.
H
I
think
they're
they're,
aware
that
there
are
two
things
that
don't
like
are
different,
but
I
think
the
like
they're,
focusing
right
now
into
to
making
integrating
the
back
end
of
the
front
end
for
all
the
all
the
modules
so
like
after
after
like
this
and
next
click
we'll
have
the
for
the
four
modules
plus
the
issue
generator
like
integrated
and
then
I
think
like
they
will
focus
in
generally
creating
the
liking
passing
through
all
those
issues
and
doing
in
like
fixing
it
so
probably
like
they
will
not
focus
on
this
right
now
because,
like
I
think,
the
having
the
these
working
like
integration
from
the
back
end
working
and
like
enable
people
to
do
the
full
cycle
of
like
changing
other
parameters
and
then
generating
their
issue
is
like
the
most
important
part.
H
C
H
H
A
Cool
there
was
also
an
issue
that
was
brought
up
in
the
sunday
spring.
Call
that,
like
the
questions
over
the
chart,
seemed
to
be
challenging
for
for,
like
and
confusing
admit
you
were
talking
about
putting
them
over
like
doing
having
a
some
solution.
I
don't
know
if
you
and
michael
have
sinked
on
that.
C
Yeah
because
the
the
questions
like
we
kind
of
hit
the
same
spot
where,
like
the
questions,
don't
correspond
to
what's
happening
on
the
graph,
and
so
I
heard
michael
say
like
just
having
the
design
like
it
doesn't
work
to
put
that
header
like
somewhere
over
there
to
the
left
like
there's
just
not
enough
space
or
whatever.
So
it's
like,
we
should
just
replace
that
text
entirely
with
something.
That's
more
generalized.
C
E
We
already
have
sorry,
we
already
have
our
tool
tips,
so
I
think
that's
when
we
I
mean
we
added
so
much
so
many
things
there
are
so
many
hovers.
You
know
two
so
many
explanations-
everything
I
just
don't
want
to
overdo
it.
So
you
know
we.
We
have
a
lot
of
tool,
tips
that
help.
If
we
want
to
remove
the
title,
I
mean
the
question:
it's
to
me:
it's
not
standing
in
a
way
and
it
can
only
push
the
chart
a
little
bit
higher
and
not
make
it
bigger.
So
so
I
don't.
E
A
But
it's
like
hey
what?
What?
Where
should
the
opening
price
be
or
something
like
that?
And
then
it's
like
here's,
this
price
scrap
that
just
where
it
just
goes
down
and
it
makes
people
think.
Oh,
this
is
a
price
graph
and
number
go
down
uh-oh.
You
know
so,
and
I
and
I
think,
there's
also
like
you
look
at
the
questions
in
dow
voting
and
it's
like
what
is
the
support
required
and
it's
like
there's
no
support
required
on
the
on
the
graph,
and
it
just
creates
a
little
bit
of
confusion.
E
Yeah
yeah,
okay.
Well
I
I
heard
those
those
comments
and
feedback
from
from
some
users,
I'm
not
sure
what
the
sample
was
of
those
who
said
like
that
was
confusing
and
the
ones
who
found
it
not
confusing.
So
I
cannot
make
a
judgment
at
this
point.
Was
that
the
majority
was
that,
like
eighty
percent
of
people
found
it
confusing
or
not
or
just
you
know,
ten
percent
out
of
ninety
percent
a
lot
of
hundred,
so
it's
it's
really
hard
to
make
a
decision
here.
E
Should
we
remove
it
or
not,
but
you
have
a
point
there
like
if
it
if
it
does
not
correspond
to
or
or
if
it
just
makes,
an
impression
that
there
is
something
on
the
graph
which
it
isn't
then
that's
bad
right,
but
I
I
was
hoping
like
when,
when
people
will
click
on
the
inputs,
they
will
see
the
change
of
of
the
question
and
knowing
that.
Actually,
this
is
question
referred
to
this
input
or
for
this
parameter
anyway.
E
Let's,
let's
try
it
out
a
few
more
times
I
mean,
let's
just
give
it
to
people
and
see
how
they
respond
to
that,
and
if
it
you
know,
if
a
lot
of
them
say
like
this
is
confusing,
you
know.
The
easiest
thing
we
can
do
is
just
remove
the
question
right
and
push
the
charitable.
So,
like
you
know,
that's
super
easy,
so
yeah
and
and
yeah.
We
already
have
a
lot
of
stuff
in
the
tooltips
anyway.
So.
A
Now
manu,
do
you
have
any
feedback
on
these
questions?
Has
anyone
ever
said
anything
about
it.
I
No,
there
hasn't
been
much
traffic.
I've
been
again,
I've
been
onboarding
people,
but
I
just
want
to
onboard
them
and
they
just
ask
them
for
something.
So
the
one
the
people
that
I
on-boarded
last
week,
I'm
gonna
ask
this
week.
I
So
there'll
be
a
lot
of
new
feedback
coming
this
week
and
hearing
what
everyone's
saying
I
was
thinking,
why
don't
we
I
mean,
instead
of
just
adding
more
resources
there
on
the
page,
I
I
guess
what's
left
would
be
like
just
a
simple
screen
recorded
explainer
video
of
someone
going
through
not
even
the
figma
prototype,
but
the
actual
website.
If
you
can
prototype,
I
mean
it
it
it's
very
close,
but
it's
not
the
actual
thing.
So
that
could
be
something
that
I
could
do.
It's
just
very
simple.
You
know
not
much.
I
You
need
a
lot
of
production
for
this
to
screen
record
it
going
through
explaining
some
things,
and
I
mean
just
people,
sometimes
they're
lazy
and
I
just
doing
explainer,
video
and
sharing
with
them,
maybe
that
that's
that
could
really
improve
on
on
the
understanding.
E
We
did
a
lot
of
onboarding,
I
mean
we
did
a
lot
of
effort
to
actually
onboard
people
properly
and
and
try
to
kind
of
teach
them
what
what
is
coming
ahead
like
in
this
in
in
in
in
the
parameter
setting
so
and
we
you
know,
talk
about
the
bonding
curve
and
there's
a
lot
of
information
right
available,
and
I
agree
with
you
like
adding
more
stuff
to
the
to
this
prototype,
or
you
know,
to
the
whole
thing
in
general,
I
think
we
should
avoid
that.
It's.
E
It
has
a
lot
of
stuff
already
in
there
so
and
our
goal
is
to
simplify
it.
But
hey
you
can't
you
can't
simplify
these
things.
You
have
to
you,
have
to
add
a
lot
of
helpers
and
all
this
stuff,
so
yeah
yeah,
like
30
seconds
video
or
something
like
45
like
they'll,
be
okay
like
to
put
on
before
they
start
doing
that.
E
But
hey,
let's
see,
first
with
the
like
the
witted
tour
that
mitch
did
with
the
onboarding
tour
and
with
all
our
help,
helpers
and
everything
that
we
prepared
during
the
onboarding
and
if
that
doesn't
work.
Well,
you
know
we
can
then
record
a
45
second
video
or
something.
I
Yeah
short
and
sweet
just
to
a
point
and
just
going
over
the
main
questions
and
the
feedback
that
I
got
that
just
gets
repeated
and
just
tackling
that,
and
I
think,
with
everything
that
we
have
already
there
it
ought
to
be.
It
ought
to
be
enough.
E
Yeah,
okay
and
one
thing
to
mention
to
everybody
here
before
we
move
on
regarding
the
figma
prototype,
so
like
we're
at
the
stage
where
of
the
prototype
maturity,
where
it's
it's
pretty
much,
we
kind
of
reach
the
limits
of
what
we
can
do
in
figma
in
product
as
a
prototyping
tool
right
so
like
if
you
say,
or
want
to
see
like
what
happens
when
a
user
clicks
that
that
and
happens.
You
know
you
know
this
changes
over
here
it
it.
E
What
we
have
to
do
is
basically
copy,
like
a
bunch
of
screens
and
to
make
a
bunch
of
variations
of
those
screens
and
make
a
lot
of
connections
which
is
which
has
already
a
lot
of
connection
connections
and
that
that
to
do
in
the
front
end
is
maybe
a
line
of
code
right
and
so
like
the
the
prototype
is
mature
enough
to
be
tested
and
perceived
as
something
like
that
will
be
live
eventually,
but
we
can't
put-
or
you
know
it's
really
hard
and
time
consuming
to
prototype
all
kinds
of
interactions.
E
So
I
would
say
we're
we're
kind
of
like
99
done
unless
some
minor
revisions,
but
we
should
avoid
any
other.
Like
you
know,
major
prototypings,
you
know
just
to
you
know,
see
how
something
will
work.
It's
easier
to
see
how
something
we're
working
like
coding
in
the
front
end
right
just
wanted
to
mention
that
okay.
H
And
just
sorry
to
direct
that,
I
completely
agree
with
you,
marco
and
I
think
like
depending
on
the
timeline.
I
think
it
probably
makes
sense
to
like
next
two
weeks
with
like
this
next
week,
we'll
probably
finish
the
module
functionalities
and
then
probably
after
that,
like
the
front-end
guys,
can
just
focus
on
like
adding
these
functionalities
like
the
extra
things
that
we
might
think
to
do,
and
probably
it's
faster
than
doing
it
by
design.
H
And
yes,
we're
talking
about
this,
like
I'm,
not
sure
about
the
timeline
like
because
I
think
the
development
is
really
pretty
like
set
up
like
you
have
like
this
week
for
the
abc
and
exit
for
the
issue
generation.
But
then
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
think
about
like
how.
How
long
are
we
going
to
have
user
testing?
H
And
then
how
long
are
we
having
the
actual
voting,
because
I
think
probably
it's
going
to
be
more
effective
if
we
like,
after
the
doing
these
two
modules,
we
take
a
time
to
implement
and
test
out
with
the
front-end
guys
these
things
and
then
do
user
testing
as
well,
because
I
think
that
probably
would
be
like
better
than
like
creating
a
video
for
like
we
finished
the
the
other,
the
abc
and
the
issue
generation
not
sure
like
after
we
have
the
functionalities,
we
can
probably
do
more
changes,
but
I'm
not
sure
like
how
how
long?
A
I
would
expect
that
it's
more,
I
mean
I
don't
think
we'll
be
doing
param
parties,
the
the
second
you
deploy
it
and
say
it's
done,
but
I
do
think
that
we
would
want
to
like
internally
test
it.
You
know
and-
and
you
know
kick
it
out-
when
it's
ready
as
soon
as
possible.
A
Just
you
know
we
did
a
lot
of
user
testing
up
front
and
user
acceptance
testing
up
front.
So
hopefully
that
is
good
enough,
but
we
won't
really
know
until
we
get
the
people
in
our
community
doing
it.
So
maybe
you
know
I
imagine
that
the
real
way
to
test
it
is
to
get
people
to
use
it.
So
I
would
also
say
that
I
really
hope
that
we
can
just
stop
adding
features.
If
there's
something
wrong.
A
We
just
start
taking
it
away
because
it's
we're
at
the
point
where
we
can
make
all
the
assumptions
we
want,
but
it's
you
know
like,
for
instance,
pedro
was
like
oh
yeah.
You
know
I
tried
to
do
this
and
it
took
me
two
hours
and
I
didn't
get
there.
Well,
it's
like
okay.
Well,
I'm
glad
you
stopped
and
we
can
leave
that
out.
A
We
can
leave
that
feature
out
completely
and
and
see
if
it's
even
needed
later
to
add
in
after
people
are
starting
to
use
this
to
design
in
the
end.
What
we
really
need
to
do
is
design
economies
not
just
like
play,
building
the
app
so
yeah.
If
there's
problems
with
something
that's
there,
I
I
hope
that
we
can
default
to
just
deleting.
B
H
Removing
it
oh
yeah,
it
took
like
great,
but
I
think
that's
why
we
are
like
having
weekly
try
to
make
it
like
to
cut
it
like
weekly
module
deliveries,
because
then,
like
we're,
not
false,
they
will
keep
trying
to
add
things
that,
like
one
small
change
like
increases
the
time
exponentially,
so
we're
like
focusing
to
do
the
minimum
possible.
So
then
you
can
create
the
things
and
then
like
after,
like
the
next
week.
These
are
next
week.
We
can
like
see,
what's
worth
not
to
add
on
this
regard
or
not.
C
A
H
C
I
C
C
D
A
Which
is
which
is
where
they
go
to
zero
and
it's
okay,
because
it's
very
clearly
price
floor.
No
one's
gonna.
D
A
D
A
Like
a
time
I
mean
it
has
the
same
access
as
the
chart
that
everyone
looks
at
every
day
when
they
open
coin
gecko,
I
mean
we
just
have
to
accept
that
you
know
time
versus
price,
so
yeah
I
mean
I
I
think
I
think
just
switching
that
really
quickly
to
a
vesting
schedule.
Would
that
would
that
be
a
lot
of
work
vtor
or
is
that
pretty
easy.
H
No,
that's
pretty
pretty
simple,
actually
like
if
you
just
similar
to
the
techno
chart
that
you
have
in
the
docs
right.
They
just
show
the
percentage
of
like
of
the
tokens
that
get
released
over
time.
Does
that
right
now?
That's
pretty
simple!
That's
pretty
simple!
I
can
add
that
I
think
it's
more
front-ending
but
like
front-end
part,
but
I
gotta
change
something
in
the
back
end
as
well,
but
I
can
do
this
and
then
like.
We
just
keep
the
table.
H
I
C
A
So
the
in
the
token
thought
page
people
keep
getting
confused
or
feel
uncomfortable.
I
think
a
lot
of
it
is
the
question
at
the
top
honestly,
but
people
feel
uncomfortable
when
they
see
price
starts
at
two
goes
down
to
zero
and
they
start
thinking.
Oh
that's
when
the
price.
D
Goes
to
zero,
you
know,
that's
not
the
first.
A
Instinct,
and
so
the
the
option
is
like
I
don't
know
some
sort
of
like
very
blunt.
This
is
a
price
floor,
you
know
and
or
like
an
explainer
like
a
pop-up.
I
don't
know-
or
you
know,
maybe
just
removing
the
question
as
a
solution,
or
maybe
we
change
the
chart
to
be
a
vesting
chart
and
it
it's
kind
of
a
boring
shot
on
it
though,
or
we
have
two
or
we
have
both
lines
there
and
we
just
gray
out
the
price
floor.
A
So
people
still
see
this
upward
line,
that's
a
little
more
prominent,
which
I
think
I
think
honestly
mitch
is
probably
the
best
idea,
but
at
the
same
time,
that
adds
a
little
more
complication
or
we
do
nothing
and
we
we
let
it
be.
I
don't
know
what
do
you
think
marco.
E
A
Well,
we,
we
can't
show
the
actual
price,
but
we
can
show
what
we
can
highlight
is
like
the
lock-up
and
the
the
freeze
and
and
thaw
just
from
like
percentage
of
tokens
on
the
on
the
y-axis
and
maybe
move
like
we
could
move
the
the
price
axis
to
to
the
right
and
have
it
be
like
this
other
right
axis
and
have
kind
of
gray
and
have
a
gray
line,
be
like
the
current
line,
make
the
current
line
kind
of
gray
or
like
fade
it
out.
So
it's
not
so
prominent.
C
Yeah
so
you'd
have
basically
the
price
floor
chart
as
it
is
there
that
would
be
grayed
out,
and
then
you
have
the
token
release,
one
which
would
be
basically
almost
like
a
mirrored
copy
of
it
going
the
other
direction
and
then
so
on
the
y-axis
here
on
the
left.
You
would
have
the
token
thaw
percentage,
so
you
know
it'd
start
at
zero
and
go
to
100
and
then
the
other
side.
You
would
have
the
price
floor
of
the
token,
which
would
start
at
wherever
and
then
eventually
go
to
zero.
E
C
C
B
Thing
that
confuses
people
because,
like
when
graphs,
look
like
graphs
people,
don't
automatically
always
assume
that
it's
like.
Oh,
the
price
goes
down
but
like
when
the
question
is
there,
then
people
are
like.
Oh,
the
price
is
going
to
zero,
so
I
think
like
if
we
just
removed
the
question-
and
we
were
like
this-
is
the
minimum
possible
price
that
you
can
reach
or
something
or
we
just.
A
E
We
do
use
it
everywhere,
so
I
I
wouldn't
just
call
it
floor
here
and
then
price
floor,
otherwise
other
parts,
but
the
thing
here
here
is
that
we're
now
looking
actually
at
the
chart
where
all
three
parameters
are
filled
in,
I
think,
like
the
first,
when
the
user
first
comes
there,
there
will
be
nothing
right,
no
like
no
line
nothing
and
they,
like.
The
question
is
like
the
chart,
is
empty
right
and
then
the
question
is:
what
is
the
opening
price.
A
E
E
Just
remove
the
question
above
the
graph
where,
on
on
the
first
module
so
like
on
the
first
module,
we
have
the
side
panel
with
parameters,
we
have
the
question
and
then
we
have
the
graph
so
just
remove
the
question
on
module
one,
but
keep
the
questions
on
module
two
three
and
four.
So
we
can
like
see
if
like
if,
if
people
are
confused
with
the
question
on
other
modules
and
yeah
yeah,
I'm
gonna
hide
them
from
module
one
in
the
prototype
as
well.
Right
now,
okay,.
A
Fantastic,
let's
see
update,
so
I
have
one
more
comment:
oh
yeah,
I
guess
it's
from
vitor
updates
on
params
work.
Well,.
H
Okay
yeah
regarding
the
network.
We're
gonna
have
our
call
today
tomorrow,
sorry
not
online,
but
fly
the
and
again
so
we're
gonna
align
the
buttons
to
be
done,
the
abc
and
what
we
need
to
change.
The
mechanic
integrate
fine
with
the
front
end.
So
probably
do
some.
H
Ideally
for
sunday
the
abc
working
so
then,
probably
like
a
few
ux
things
will
not
be
like
perfect.
As
we
said.
H
Probably,
there
are
a
few
things
that
are
limited
by
the
by
the
library,
but,
like
the
whole,
the
whole
like
changing
and
selecting
parameters
would
be
working
as
for
the
other
ones
and
regarding
the
and
I
started
doing
the
looking
for
the
bot
for
the
about
creating
issues
for
the
next
week
as
well,
so
we'll
talk
to
zap
about
it
and
I'm
just
going
to
create
the
new
github
account
and
etc
email
for
them.
H
We
can
start
doing
this
as
well,
because
then
we
can
just
start
to
create
variations
and
test
on
that
which
is
going
to
be
your
next
step
and
yeah.
After
after,
like
these
ibc
and
then
the
creative
issues
I
think
like
could
be
great
for
user
testing,
because
even
if
the
user
interface
is
not
perfect,
yeah
like
people
will
start
to
like
create
their
issue,
their
selected
parameters
and
generate
their
issues.
And
then
I
think,
like
the
whole
thing,
would
be
more
clear
to
people
in
general
and
yeah.
H
I
think
that's
it
so
next
on
this
week
abc
and
expect
the
issues
and
then
we're
good
to
have
like
the
whole
thing
functional,
and
then
we
can
just
try
to
select
where
to
move
on
the
focus
to
improve
like
either
in
the
design
things
or
one
specific
module.
Yeah.
H
D
H
A
Cool
yeah
and
I
think
getting
the
conviction.
Voting
module
to
a
more
serviceable
spot
too,
would
be
definitely
valuable
for
the
demo.
A
H
Oh
yeah
yeah
and
the
the
radio
buttons
right
the
for
the
day
yeah
I
implemented
a
doctor
federer
about
that.
I
was
implementing
this
today
and
for
for
thursday,
will
be
implemented
as
well,
because
they're
like
it
was,
it
was
considering
the
the
as
if
your
convictions
were
full
but
not.
You
could
not
choose
the
days
and
election
yeah
for
thursday.
A
Super
cool,
I
know
everyone
at
giveth
it
I'm
I'm
really
excited
to
start
playing
with
it.
Just
for
parameterizing
giveth,
you
know
and
and
starting
to
play
around.
So
I
think
it'll
be,
I
think,
and
I
think
gardens.
I
think
everyone's
really
excited
about
being
able
to
play
with
the
conviction.
Voting
page
so
that'll
be
super
cool.
A
Any
other
question
any
other
questions
for
vtor.
While
we
have
them
on
the
development
side.
A
Now
everyone's
like
dude,
we
talk
to
me
door
all
the
time,
dm
dmdm,
so
that's
cool.
Actually,
this
was
something
that
fabio
brought
up
in.
A
One
of
our
chats
was
that
maybe
we
should
do
a
little
bit
more
coordination
in
the
parameters
channel
and
discord
if
we
can
remember
to
because
we're
doing
so
many
dms,
but
it'd
be
really
nice
if
the
dm
was
just
hey,
go
check
the
prems
channel
and
discord,
and
so
people
could
see
that
all
the
action
that
you're
doing
and
and
more
in
the
behind
instead
behind
the
scenes,
but
actually
in
discord.
I
just
remembered
that
right
now,
but
I
I
need
to
do
the
same.
A
I
don't
I
don't
mean
to
formalize
it
at
all.
It's
really
just
having
the
chatter
happen
more
in
public,
so
people
can
see
that
magic
is
happening
and
maybe
even
feel
like,
I
don't
know,
feel
like
they.
They
might
learn
something
from
the
side.
I
don't
think
we
have
to
do
like
daily
stand-ups
or
anything
like
that.
Just
like
a
lot
of
these
dms
and
decisions
that
are
being
made
and
like
challenges
that
people
are
having,
if
we
all
get
to
read
them,
it
might
be
beneficial.
A
Okay
cool,
so
then
we
have,
we
have,
I
know
manu.
I
know
you
said
that
there
wasn't
a
whole
lot
of
action,
but
maybe
if
you,
since
we
have
you
here
what
just
from
like
the
last
month
of
user
testing,
what
would
you
say
the
biggest
confusion
points
were
or
challenges
that
people
were
having
in
using
the
module.
I
I
think
the
ones
that
I'm
pushing
out
right
now,
as
instructed
by
marco,
I
think
those
are
the
ones
the
augmented
bonding
curve.
The
conviction
voting
and
those
two
mostly
mark
also
added
the
summary.
So
for
me
to
push
the
abc
the
conviction,
voting
and
the
summary,
and
those
would
be
in
terms
of
slides.
I
It's
17,
19,
21,
23,
25,
26
27
29,
because
it
keeps
going
back
and
forth
so.
I
I
mean,
I
think,
we're
walking
a
tightrope
between
displaying
too
much
information
and
actually
incentivizing
people
to
do
their
own
research
and
it's
just
a
design
choice.
At
this
point
I
mean
it's,
it's
token
engineering
it.
It
is
engineering,
it
requires
some
level
of
expertise,
so
I
think
yeah.
I
think.
C
I
know
griff
likes
to
party,
but
you
know
it
was
like
it
had
to
be.
Every
single
person
had
to
be
like
walked
through,
and
that
was
just
like
the
hatch
one,
which
was
honestly
super
easy
compared
to
this.
So
if
we
can
eliminate
that
overhead,
because
I'm
slowly
learning
no
matter
how
many
times
you
tell
people
to
read,
they
still
won't
do
it.
H
C
G
H
Like
we
can
do
a
more
fancy
walkthrough
like
video
walkthrough,
once
it's
like
ready
and
like
I,
I
could
do
this
as
well
like
record.
I
have
a
like
here.
I
can
do
that,
but,
like
maybe
do
just
a
little
bit
of
scripting,
just
to
get
sure
that,
like
it
is
like
simple
and
not
that
long
video,
but
then
people
can
like,
then
you
can
just
like
find
this
video
and
then
probably
like
will
be
less
time
consuming
than
around
calls
for
cards.
H
F
A
Cool,
well
then,
that's
that's.
I
think
that's
our
show.
I
I
mean
I,
I
love
this
conversation
but
at
the
same
time
it's
always
nice
to
end
early.
So
we
can
we
can
continue.
Hopefully
we
can
continue
this
conversation
in
the
discord
and
and
chat
it
up
there
and
hang
out.
Thank
you,
ashley,
malmanu
and
septimus
for
dropping,
in
always
great
and,
of
course,
the
rest
of
the
team.
That's
always
here,
but
really
appreciated
that.