►
From YouTube: PARAM DEBATE! (10-01-2022)
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Question
if
but
want
to
hear
everyone's
thoughts
on
it,
what
what
is
your
favorite
proposal
and
your
least
favorite
proposal,
and
try
to
keep
it
to
like
15
seconds
about
the
wise
and
then
then
I'll
be
a
heavy
facilitator
on
that,
because
we
don't
have
much
time
and
then
we'll
just
pass
it
around,
and
you
can
also
just
say:
I'm
completely
undecided
and
I
don't
know
so-
I'm
actually
well
yeah,
we'll
just
pass
around
wonka.
Do
you
want
to
start?
What's
your
favorite
proposal
on
your
least
favorite
proposal?
B
Yeah,
on
the
first
spot,
it's
it's
tied,
ostrom's,
baby
and
goldilocks.
I,
like
both
proposals
and
my
least
favorite
proposal,
is
420
and
I'll
pass
to
libby.
C
Hey
yeah,
my
my
favorite
proposal
is
mathematics
because
I
think
it's
very
well
balanced
and
it's
the
one
that
made
most
sense
for
me
so
far
and
my
least
favorite
is
420
because
I
think
it's
silos,
I
think
it's
not
so
inclusive
and
I'll
pass
to
jeff.
A
Jeff,
so
I
don't
know
if
you've,
even
you
can
just
say
undecided,
but
the
question
is:
what
is
your
favorite
proposal?
What
is
your
least
favorite
proposal
and
why
30
seconds.
D
Yes,
I
would
say
I'm
undecided,
but
I'm
happy
to
hear
the
opinions
and
favorites
of
everyone
else
here.
So
I
can
end
this
session
with
a
better
idea
on
which
proposal
I'm
voting.
For
so
I
will
pass
to
sorry.
I
came
in
a
little
bit
late.
Nothing
have
you
gone
yet.
E
No,
I
haven't
thanks
jeff
well,
my
favorite
for
now
is
mathmatics,
but
I
I
also
like
ostrom's
baby
a
lot.
I
think
there
are
some
similarities
and
I
I
like
it
and
my
least
favorite
I
think,
would
be
for
now
420.
I
think
it's
a
bit
too
extreme
this
about
yeah,
the
the
bonding
of
the
peptic
stream
and
I'll
pass
to
marco.
F
A
F
Can
you
guys
hear
me
mm-hmm,
yep,
yeah,
okay,
cool,
I'm
in
the
same
position
as
jeff?
Actually
I
joined
this
call
to
actually
get
a
little
bit
more
clarity
on
all
the
proposals.
I
was
on
a
vacation,
so
I'm
kind
of
catching
up,
so
my
hopes
is
that
you
guys
will
be
discussing
something
and
I
will
get
more
insights
and
by
the
end
of
this
call
I
will
be
able
to
make
a
decision
so
so
yeah,
that's
where
I
am
so.
F
I
guess
undecided
and
no
favorite,
no
least
favorite
until
next
time,
I
guess
and
yeah.
So
I
pass
it
over
to
a
grief.
Can
you
pass
over
to
someone
please.
A
Yeah,
let's
throw
it
to
let's
throw
it
to
tam,
what's
your
favorite
least
favorite
and
keep
it
to
30
seconds.
A
Okay,
how
about
maria.
F
Hi
everybody
yeah,
I'm
also
undecided,
just
starting
to
dig
into
it
and
I,
like
the
process,
to
be
honest,
I
haven't
been
involved
directly
but
followed
it
and
I
love
the
process
and
it's
really
insightful
already
and
I'm
hoping
to
get
an
additional
insights
today.
Looking
forward
to
the
discussion.
A
F
Hey
guys,
I'm
undecided,
I
got.
H
F
A
Nice
and
how
about
ann
brody,
I
assume
you're
also
still
undecided,
but.
A
Nice
olivia
did
you
go.
F
A
F
A
My
god,
oh
santi,
do
you
have
a
favorite
param
proposal
or
least
favorite
pram
proposal?
Are
you
still
undecided.
A
Nice
and
I
think,
that's
everyone,
correct
okay,
then,
let's
get
started
so
the
format
for
today
is
going
to
be
six
minutes
for
each
each
param
debate
each
parameter
set.
There
are
a
few
people
who
are
in
a
call
right
now
that
will
come
for
the
end,
so
they
can
present
their
parameter
sets.
But
we're
going
to
put
six
minutes
on
the
clock.
Noggin
will
go
first
to
do
mathematics
after
that
wonka
you
could
do
ostrom's
baby,
I'm
hoping
and
then
we'll
sort
it
out
from
there.
A
So
yeah
we'll
have
six
minutes
for
an
for
each
parameter
proposal
lead
to
speak.
Why
it's
the
best
proposal
and
then
six
minutes
of
debate,
so
keep
your
questions
answered,
and
I
want
to
recommend
nagin
and
wonka.
If
you
can
use
the
voters
pamphlet
as
much
as
you
can,
and
also
especially
compare
yourself
against
other
proposals
about
what
makes
you
different,
okay,
cool,
so
noggin.
If
you're
ready
to
share
screen,
you
can
take
it
away.
E
The
idea
was
to
have
a
proposal
that
is
a
bit
middle
of
the
road
I
kind
of
took
stuff
from
from
the
others
and
kind
of
mixed
them
in
a
way
that
made
sense
for
for
me
and
trying
to
take
a
bit
of
the
best
of
everywhere,
yeah,
so
I'll
just
go
through
the
through
the
stuff,
real
quick
for
the
model
module
one.
E
E
I
think
I
think
it
is
fair
to
expect
of
the
hatches
to
have
a
long
commitment
to
this
project
and
I've,
but
I
also
think
that
we
should
give
people
the
chance
to
leave
if
they
want
to
and
kind
of
scale
out
in
a
way
that
doesn't
hurt
the
the
project
through
through
strong
selling
pressure.
E
E
First
of
all,
because
after
the
after
the
minting
the
actual
impact
hour
minting,
we
kind
of
diluted
the
the
actual
funds
backing
htc
token
to
around
74
cents,
so
it's
kind
of
closer
to
the
real
thing,
and
mainly
because
this
allows
playing
around
with
the
bonding
curve.
E
Since
we
are
going
to
be
the
make,
the
initial
buy
in
the
gc
is
going
to
be
the
first
buyer
in
the
in
the
bonding
curve.
By
setting
a
lower
initial
price,
we
can
give
the
tc
the
chance
to
buy
a
lot
of
tokens
for
the
for
funding
operations
and
for
the
for
protocol
owned
liquidity
in
our
in
in
my
case.
In
this
case,
it
will
be.
E
E
While
it
also
allows
us
to
have
a
very
high
commons
tribute,
which
gives
us
more
than
a
million
dollars
in
the
common
pool
for
funding
projects
in
token
engineering.
So
I
think
this
is
kind
of
the
best
of
both
worlds.
E
Also
after
the
initial
buy-in
that
the
the
public
price
would
be
at
1
42,
which
is
a
is
a
fair
profit
for
the
for
the
risk
the
hatches
have
been
taking
and
the
end,
this
lower
reserve
ratio
of
14.7
will
also
have
the
effect
that
that
the
price
will
be
able
to
grow
faster
than
than
in
other.
In
other
proposals,
which
will
also,
I
think,
give
a
certain
protections
against
against
wales
just
buying
all
the
supply
and
getting
all
the
voting
power.
E
I
think
juanka
made
this
great
graph
here,
where
he
showed
how
much
how
much
voting
power
would
be
in
the
in
the
hand
of
buyers
and
of
hatchers,
depending
on
the,
when
buying
a
50
million
x
die,
and
in
our
case,
in
this
case,
50
million
extra
would
give
more
or
less
half
of
the
voting
power
to
the
market,
which,
I
think
is
is
fair.
E
It
also
has
a
lower
tribute
than
the
other
proposals,
because
I
think
it
is
doing
to
encourage
people
to
yeah
to
to
buy.
I
think
if
we,
if
we,
if
anybody,
starts
researching
this
and
and
wants
to
join
and
sees
he
has
to
pay
a
20
entry
tax.
I
think
this
will
scare
off
a
lot
of
people.
I
think
a
low
but
fair
end-to-end
exit
tax
is
is
the
way
to
go,
and
the
seven
percent
tribute
is
significant
on
the
long
run.
E
E
Okay,
yeah
well
on
ontel
voting.
It's
on
the
it.
The
the
double
bonding
parameters
are
designed
to
be
as
stable
as
possible.
It
has
a
very
high
support
required,
a
normal
minimum
quorum
and
a
vote
of
seven
days
with
four
days
voting
period.
I
think
yeah,
the
the
dow
parameters
as
they
are
shouldn't,
be
constantly
changed
and
there
should
be
a
high
consensus
if
we,
if
we
want
to
change
them.
So
that
is
the
logic
behind
that
and
for
the
conviction,
voting.
E
A
Yep,
you
only
had
one
second
left,
okay,
so
so
perfect
timing,
and
if
anyone
would
like
to
ask
any
questions,
this
is
the
moment.
I
E
Well,
I
think,
since
this
is
televoting
is
only
going
to
be
to
kind
of
change
the
parameters
of
the
dow
itself,
I
think,
having
well
it's
it's
11
days,
if
there's
a
vote
extension,
if
there
isn't
it's
eight
days,
which
is
like
a
week
for
the
whole
voting
process
and
then
just
one
day
as
for
the
execution,
I
think
giving
the
people
the
time
to
really
think
about
it
and
and
vote.
I
think
people
have
lives
and
stuff
to
do.
E
We
have
four
days
for
the
delegates
and
then
the
whole
weekend
for
the
people
to
review
what
the
delegates
voted
and
and
change
that
vote
if
they,
if
they
feel
so,
I
think,
most
of
the
time
it
will
be
the
delegates
voting
so
yeah.
So
I
think,
seven
days
plus
one
day,
execution
is
kind
of
reasonable
and
if
there's
extension,
I
think
we
should
also
give
time
people
to
do
the
information
to
come
to
them
and
then
have
time
to
think
about
it
and
choose
choose
something.
E
But
it's
it's
a
fair
question.
Thanks.
A
Okay,
so
on
that
the
91
is
that
too
high
I
mean,
could
you
imagine
I've
heard
other
people
ask
this
question,
I'm
curious.
What
your
answer
is.
E
I
think
that
if
there
is
a
significant
opposition,
it
is
it
signals
that
we
should
that
the
proposal
could
go
back
to
the
drawing
board.
I
I
expect
most
of
the
time
to
just
the
delegates
to
vote,
so
I
to
pass
the
threshold
usually
about
blocking
yeah.
I
don't.
I
don't
think
somebody
can
just
I
mean
somebody
would
have
to
invest
a
significant
amount
of
money
and
just
have
it
there
for
for
griefing,
I'm
I'm
unsure.
E
If
that
is
a
is
a
big
attack,
attack,
vector
or
or
just
you
know,
looking
at
the
difference
or
if
three
percent
more
or
three
percent
less
support
required
is
going
to
really
defend
us
against
that
kind
of
attack,
especially
with
with
bonding
curves
with
a
low
reserve
ratio.
So
the
price
doesn't
so
it
becomes
less
expensive
to
accumulate
a
big
amount
of
the
of
the
of
the
supply.
So
it's
it's
it's
a
risk,
but
I
don't
think
this
proposal
is
especially
vulnerable
to
that
comparison
to
the
others.
G
E
Well,
I
mean
it's:
it's
always
a
risk
to
to
spend
stuff
to
spend
the
money
badly.
I
think
you
kind
of
you
can't
have
or
people
just
funding
very
big
stuff
which
goes
wrong,
but
you
can
all
have
to
also
have
this
debt
by
a
thousand
cuts
where
people
just
kind
of
get
small
proposals
passed
quickly.
E
I
think
we
should
be
careful
with
how
we
with
how
we
with
how
we
with
what
we
fund
and
we
should
really
think
about
it.
But
that's
that's
a
cultural
and
governance
problem,
because
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
tackle
big
things.
E
Big
projects
if
we
want
to-
and
I
think
again-
that
just
keeping
the
lights
on
and
funding
operations
is
going
to
take
some
some
some
funds
and
and
we
and
we
shouldn't-
and
we
should
be
able
to
to
fund
that
easily
and
not
have
to
resort
to
really
high
convict
high
high
amount
of
vote
stake
or
something
just
to
pass.
E
A
Okay,
mathematics
well
I'll,
take
this
30
seconds
extra
then
to
to
just
show
people
how
to
vote.
So
there
is
a.
There
is
a
actually
nugget.
Maybe
you
could
you
could
since
you're
already
sharing
screen?
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
show
them
the
snapshot
page.
A
Yet
yeah
sure,
actually
I'll
I'll
I'll
steal
the
shared
screen
from
you.
Then
okay.
A
So
we
are
voting
on
snapshot
and
it's
a
very
novel
vote.
In
fact,
this
is
probably
I
mean
other
than
the
test
that
we've
already
done.
No
one's
really
used
quadratic
rank
choice
voting
before
so
it's
kind
of
a
very
novel
approach,
but
basically
you
get
to
rank
in
order,
your
favorite
proposals
and
you
want
to
pick
four
proposals
and
rank
them
in
order.
A
If
you
pick
less
than
four
that's
also
okay,
but
it
means
that
if
the
winning
proposal
wasn't
one
of
the
ones
you
picked,
your
votes
will
not
be
counted
basically,
and
so
it's
a
really
cool
voting
strategy,
where
a
hundred
percent
of
your
votes
go
to
the
first
proposal
that
you
pick
and
then,
if
that
proposal
has
the
least
number
of
first
place
votes,
then
all
of
your
votes
go
to
your
second
place
proposal
and-
and
you
can
see,
the
current
situation
is
that
goldilocks
has
the
most
votes.
A
Although
not
many
people
have
voted,
only
22
people
have
voted,
but
we
have
goldilocks
and
bolsheviks.
Gambit
is
number
two
so,
but
you
can
rank
them
in
order
and
you
can
vote
in
that
way
with
your
tec-h
tokens.
There
are
also
two
other
votes
that
are
worth
mentioning.
That
are
a
little
bit
more
nuanced,
but
I'm
just
going
to
take
a
moment
to
describe
them
here.
There
is
this:
what
should
the
vest?
When
should
the
vesting
period
start?
A
So
we
have
this
token
freeze,
that's
being
described
in
the
token
thought,
but
now
we
we
kind
of
there.
We
see
that
there's
a
two-week
deployment,
so
we
never
really
stabilized
exactly
when
the
freeze
would
start
along
this
two-week
deployment.
So
basically
there
is,
does
the
token
free
start
on
january
13th?
Does
it
start
with
when
conviction
voting
opens?
Does
it
start
when
the
bonding
curve
opens
or
do
you
get
just
not
care
and
you
want
the
devs
to
pick
a
date?
A
Those
are
your
four
options
because
in
the
end
the
devs
have
to
pick
a
date
so,
but
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
guys
have
a
chance
to
say,
and
currently
it's
when
the
abc
opens
is
the
current
date,
which
is
the
latest.
So,
if
you're,
if
you
like
longer
vesting,
you
probably
want
to
vote
for
this.
A
If
you
like,
shorter
vesting,
you
like
to
vote
for
that,
if
you
want
to
do
it,
when
the
token
starts,
you
know
you
could
do
it
when
this
conviction
voting
opens
and
there's
a
lot
more
conversation
about
this
in
the
forum
post,
there's
another
vote
also,
and
all
of
these
are
ranked
choice.
Voting
this
other
vote
is
a
little
more
nuanced,
but
there's
this
the
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
anyone
with
techh
tokens.
Can
rage
quit
from
the
dao
if
they
don't
like
the
economics
that
were
chosen.
A
This
is
a
truly
decentralized
process,
but
decentralized
processes
come
with
some
ambiguity.
Sometimes,
so
we
don't
know
exactly
how
much
money
we're
gonna
have
in
the
dow
or
how
many
tokens
will
exist
so
they're
the
actual
bonding
curve,
because
we
don't
have
stability
in
the
number
of
tokens
and
the
amount
of
money
that's
in
the
curve.
The
actual
deployment
will
never
be.
A
Unless
there's
some
perfection
of
the
number
of
people
who
rage
quit
in
our
assumptions
there,
we
will
not
be
able
to
match
the
proposal
that
wins
perfectly
so
we'll
have
to
make
some
concessions
so
basically
there's
four
options:
either
we
keep
the
reserve
ratio
constant,
which
is
the
shape
of
the
curve.
A
We
keep
the
opening
price,
constant
and,
and
that
way
the
price
will
start
out
the
same
and
the
best
that
we
can
and
then
we'll
adjust
the
reserve
ratio
and
the
initial
buying
commons
tribute
around
that
or
we
keep
the
initial
buy-in
commons
tribute
constant,
so
that
the
right
amount,
the
as
close
as
we
can
the
amount,
the
ratio
between
the
conviction,
voting
pool
and
the
bonding
curves
pool
will
be
constant,
and
then
we
change
the
reserve
ratio
and
opening
price
to
mitigate
the
fa.
A
These
these
adjustments,
or
we
vary
all
of
the
parameters
and
just
try
to
keep
to
the
spirit
of
the
proposal,
the
best
that
we
can.
So
those
are
the
four
options
there.
This
is
the
other
vote,
so
so
yeah.
We
please
consider
voting
on
these
things.
There
are
these
three
active
votes.
Of
course,
the
runoff
vote,
the
main
one
off
vote.
A
Please
consider
voting
on
all
four,
although
if
you
don't
want
to
research
those,
you
can
also
just
delegate
your
decision
to
the
community,
who
is
paying
more
attention,
which
is
totally
fine
on
the
other
two
votes.
But
you
know,
I
think,
they're
simple
enough,
that
with
a
quick
read
in
five
minutes,
you
could
probably
get
an
understanding
and
if
you
feel
comfortable
voting
the
commons
upgrade.
I
would
also
advise
you
to
also
vote
and
say
your
piece
on
these
other
three
votes
so
yeah,
that's
the
this
is
the
voting
system.
A
It's
snapshot.org,
slash,
pound,
sign
or
whatever
slash
t
commons,
dot,
f
and
I'll
put
this
in
the
parameters
channel
and
with
that
I'll
pass
it
to
wonka.
Oh
thank
you
wonka.
You
already
put
in
the
parameters
channel,
okay.
I.
A
B
Well,
the
proposal
of
strom's
baby.
I
think
it's
a
proposal
that
aims
to
open
the
the
the
bonding
curve
allowing
people
to
participate
in
the
governance
too,
and
I've
been
running
some
tests
on
on
on
the
proposals,
and
I
want
to
show
how
how
this
governance
works
with
offstrom's
baby.
B
The
hatcheries
tokens
are
two
million
of
tokens
and
with
ostrom's
baby
with
50
million
in
entering
the
bonding
curve,
we
we
would
have
three
three
million
eight
hundred
new
tc
tokens
minted.
That
means
that,
with
50
million
entering
into
the
bonding
curve,
the
hatcheries
will
have
38
percent
of
the
governance
and
the
market
will
have
55
percent
of
the
governance.
B
I
think
it's
it's
good
to
allow
newcomers
to
have
governance,
and
also,
I
think
that
that
it
it's
it's
also
very
important
to
have
a
a
high
reserve
ratio
so
that
we
can
sustain
our
economy
even
in
the
case
that
hatcher's
tokens
are
sold-
and
I
am-
I
don't
know
if,
if
it's
because
I
am
always
thinking
in
conflict
management,
but
I
I
have
been
measuring
some
risks
in
the
proposals,
and
one
thing
that
I
like
about
this
proposal
is
that
if
50
of
the
hatcher's
tokens
are
sold
with
50
million
wrap
exercise
into
the
bonding
curve,
the
price
only
drops
from
33
to
18..
B
So
that
means
that,
even
though
that
we
have
a
big
piece-
and
we
are
important
in
the
in
in
the
governance,
even
in
the
worst
case
scenario
that
hatcher's
tokens
are
sold,
the
economy
can
can
continue
and
yeah.
I
think
this.
This
is
really
fair,
because
with
50
million
in
they
would
have
two-thirds
of
the
governance
and
we
would
have
one-third
of
the
governance
and,
and
we
we
placed
1.5
million.
B
In
contrast
to
these
50
million
in
so,
I
think,
like
hatcher's,
will
still
have
a
lot
of
governance,
but
we
are
allowing
people
to
to
to
have
governance
with
this
configuration
this
same
test.
I
I
run
it
with
each
of
the
proposals
and
after
ostrom's
baby
comes
goldilocks,
giving
the
market
57
of
of
governance
with
50
million
in.
B
I
think
this
is
also
good
as
long
along
with
bolsheviks
and
even
mathematics,
but
I
I
want
to
raise
a
flag
around
420
proposal
and
is
that,
as
the
reserve
ratio
is
so
low
minting
tokens
is
extremely
extremely
difficult.
B
So
I
am
very
scared
about
this
scenario,
but
I
think
we
should
build
our
economy
thinking
that
we
can
sustain
even
the
worst
and
yeah.
We
are
saying,
like.
Okay,
hatchers
are
not
going
to
sell,
but
I
think
like
with
this
volatility
that
420
gives
it
would
be
first
interesting
for
hatchers
to
sell,
but
also
as
the
reserve
ratio
is
so
low.
B
And
yeah,
one
of
the
things
that
I
like
about
also
this
proposal
is
that
it
starts
with
a
low
opening
price
and
it
allows
us
to
buy
a
lot
of
tc
from
the
initial
buy.
There's
other
things.
B
B
Yeah
we
have
here
280k
of
of
of
tc
tokens
and
yeah.
I
like
this
proposal
because
it's
it's
the
one
that
allows
more
than
the
people
that
come
after
the
the
initialization
of
the
bonding
curve
can
play
a
significant
role
in
the
organization
and
not
that
we
as
hatchers
govern
the
economy
and
and
people
that
comes
after
will
never
be
able
to
have
as
much
governance
as
as
we
have
and
yeah.
B
I
think
that,
as
we
are
a
value-aligned
community
and
and
we've
been
talking
about
not
being
at
a
technocracy,
I
think
that
this
boat,
it's
very
important,
to
not
become
a
technocracy,
because
if,
if
we
don't
let
the
people
that
comes
after
to
have
governance,
we
will
eventually
become
a
technocracy.
A
Nice,
nice,
sorry
about
that.
Okay,
let's
start
the
clock
on
questions
for
astrum's
baby.
Anybody
have
any
anything
they
want
to
know
more.
B
Yeah,
of
course,
the
thing
is
that
in
420
the
reserve
ratio
is
really
low,
and
that
means
one
that
minting
tokens
will
be
harder
and
two
that
the
price
goes,
that
the
money
entering
into
the
bonding
curve
goes
directly
to
the
price
and
not
to
the
reserve
of
of
the
price.
So
that
means
that
the
price
of
the
token
will
go
up,
but
there
will
no.
There
will
not
be
more
tokens.
There
will
be
the
same
tokens
that
the
hatchers
have.
B
So
if
that
means
that,
if
the
the
a
lot
of
money
enters
into
the
bonding
curve,
hatchers
can
sell
their
tokens
and
actually
take
a
look,
a
lot
of
money
from
the
economy,
because
the
money
that
is
entering
the
and
raising
the
price
they
are,
they
are
selling
it
on
the
tokens
that
were
already
minted
and
yeah.
B
I
don't
know
if
I
am
explaining
myself
well,
but
here
in
this
in
this
scenario,
if
50
percent
of
hatcher's
tokens
are
sold
with
50
million
wrap
extra
into
the
bonding
curve,
the
hatcheries
that
sold
would
have
41
million
rap
x
die
yeah,
there
will
be
no
meeting.
Tokens
will
be
very
difficult.
B
Hatchers
will
have
the
tokens
that
they
have
from
the
initial
distribution
and
the
price
will
go
up.
So
if,
if,
if
hatchers
sell,
they
can
easily
drop
the
price
of
the
token
below
one
dollar,
but
in
all
the
others,
as
the
reserve
ratio
is
a
little
bit
higher.
B
Yeah,
the
power
of
the
hatchers
becomes
more
even
with
the
power
that
the
market
can
have
like
here
in
this.
In
this
in
this
proposal
in
420
to
mint
the
same
amount
of
tokens
that
hatchers
have,
that
is
2
million,
it's
almost
impossible.
So
it's
impossible
to
have
the
same
governance
that
hatchers
have,
and
I
think
that
will
be
that
will
that
will
end
up
being
a
technocracy.
B
So
so
I
think
that
we
need
to
allow
newcomers
to
cover
burn
with
us
and
what
nostrum's
baby
is
the
proposal
that
has
done
the
most
because
to
to
have
to
mean
the
same
amount
of
tokens
that
hatchers
have
the
the
market
will
have
to
to
to
enter
into
the
bonding
curve.
B
Seven
million
500
and
in
the
other
proposals
like
in
20
million
there
is
when,
when
the,
when
the
bonding
curve
gets
20
million,
we
will
have
like
yeah
to
at
twice
like
the
same
amount
of
governance
that
hatchers
that
hatchers
have
but
minted
and
and
in
bolsheviks
also
20
million
and
in
mathematics
in
15
in
50
million.
But
here
in
420
it's
impossible
to
meet
all
the
tokens
given
to
hatchers.
A
Any
other
questions
for
wonka
yeah.
I.
C
C
Or
three
questions
actually,
but
I'll
do
one
one
first,
so
I
guess
is
there
any
concern
that
you
have
or
do
you
think,
there's
any
likelihood
that
there
could
be
a
one
or
a
group
of
people
who
buy
equal
amounts
of
tokens
to
the
hackers
and
sort
of
take
over
the
2ec?
Do
you
think
that's
the
scenario
with
this
one
proposal
and
then
for
the
simulations.
C
I
think
it's
really
amazing
that
each
of
the
times
you
do
those
and
then
50
million
buy-in
and
50
and
half
their
selling
50
percent
is
one
scenario.
Are
there
any
other
scenarios
that
we
were
able
to
look
at
and
is
there
any
difference
between
how
to
selling
on
the
secondary
market
versus
primary
markets?
And
these
simulations.
B
Well,
the
level
of
complexity
was
not
so
deep,
because
this
is
not
like
my
my
area
of
expertise,
but
I
have
learned
by
by
by
practicing
and
with
all
these
parameter
parties,
and
then
I
was
throwing
just
numbers
into
the
dashboard,
and
this
is
what
I
saw
and
since
I
saw
this
I
have
I
have
been
like.
Oh
my
god.
Oh
my
god,
I
need
I
don't.
I
don't
want
to
panic,
but
like
yeah,
I
don't
want.
B
I
don't
want
us
to
to
become
that
what
we
initially
said
that
we
didn't
want
it
to
be
like
yeah.
We
didn't
want
it
to
be
to
be
a
technocracy
and
we
want
to
be
a
collaborative
economics
and
like
with
this
proposal
of
420,
we
will
eventually
become
a
technocracy,
because
the
market
will
never
have
as
much
governance
and
as
much
tokens
as
the
hatchers
have
and.
B
Well,
I
think
that
scenario
will
be
difficult
and
someone
would
have
to
to
to
place
like
three
or
four
times
they
say
the
the
the
money
that
that
hutchers
gave
to
to
have
that
that
amount
of
governance,
and
also
I
one
of
the
things
that
I
like
about
a
low
opening
price,
that
most
of
the
proposals
have
is
also
that
when
they
then,
when
the
abundant
curbs,
open,
hatchers
can
have
like
a
second
hatch,
a
second
opportunity
to
buy
tc,
and
we
will
have
it
from
the
lowest
price.
B
A
A
We're
we're
way
over
time.
Sorry,
no,
it's!
Okay!
It
was
great
a
round
of
applause
for
nugget
and
wonka.
We
forgot
to
give
a
round
of
applause
for
noggin.
It
takes
a
lot
of
courage.
A
Yeah
and
actually
we
have
nate
nate,
you
know
everyone's
talking
trash
about
4
20..
You
you're
gonna
need
a
round
of
applause
early
here
to
represent
that
one.
Do
you
want
to
dive
into
it.
I
Yes,
I
do,
I
will
shut
my
screen.
Give
me
one.
Second,
okay,
everybody
hear
me:
okay,
yeah
right
here,
you
great
so
420
is
proposal
I'll
be
defending
here.
So
let's
go
over
each
module
one
by
one.
We
have
our
token
freeze
and
tokenthal
parameters,
the
420
token
freezing
token
doll
is
the
longest
token
freezing
token,
though
out
of
all
of
them
considering
the
high
opening
price.
This
makes
sense.
We
want
to
have
a
longer
token
freeze
and
a
long
token
thaw
combination
with
the
price
that
high.
I
We
won't
want
to
have
a
gradual
release
of
those
tokens.
So
there's
not
a
lot
of
not
too
much
cell
pressure
all
at
once,
causing
instability.
The
longer
token
freeze
offers
a
another
benefit
in
that
we
allow
some
economic
activity
to
occur
on
the
bonding
curve
before
anybody
is
able
to
sell
off
anything.
So
the
the
benefit
of
that
is
is
just
making
sure
that
the
hatcheries
are
vested
for
a
long
period
of
time
that
we
have
enough
time
for
economic
activity
to
occur
and
that
there's
not
a
lot
of
cell
pressure
on
it.
I
I
I
We
have
a
really
low
reserve
ratio,
which
means
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
volatility
on
the
bonding
curve,
buys
and
sells
onto
the
bonding
curve
and
that's
really
attractive
for
a
number
of
reasons,
not
only
for
speculation
but
also
for
arbitrage
opportunities
and
the
bots.
We
also
have
some
one
of
the
highest
tribute
percentages.
I
We
we
anticipate
this
at
the
beginning,
especially
during
that
long
freeze
period,
that
this
is
a
good
way
to
make
sure
that
speculators
are
kind
of
blocked
out
a
little
bit.
You
know
if
you're
going
to
be
joining
and
paying
a
12
tax
you're
going
to
want
to
be
value
aligned.
I
It
has
a
huge
opening
market
cap,
which
could
have
a
lot
of
benefits
in
terms
of
perception
from
the
public,
so
that
is
really
nice
benefit
of
it.
Moving
on
to
okay,
so
to
just
to
address
some
of
wonka's
concerns.
I
It's
it's
really
about
trade-offs,
so
the
420
proposal
makes
it
nearly
impossible
for
anybody
to
compete
with
the
the
hatchers
in
governance.
I
In
order
to
to
match
the
tec
tokens
in
governance
for
the
hatchers,
it
will
take
millions
and
millions
of
dollars,
which
means
yes,
the
hatcheries
will
have
much
more
governance
power
throughout
the
lifetime
of
the
the
economy,
and
I
don't
think
that
that
is
a
bad
thing
inherently.
I
don't
think
it
locks
people
out
from
governance.
I
I'm
gonna
sell
a
couple
of
them.
You
know,
and
so
you're
gonna
slowly
distribute
that
that
governance
power
out
to
the
newcomers
as
time
goes
on,
without
risking
any
type
of
threat
towards
the
overall
governance
or
overall
power
shift
within
the
dow,
and
so
that
keeps
it
in
the
hands
of
the
people
who
are
here
who
are
have
a
vested
interest
in
seeing
this
economy
work,
seeing
public
foot,
goods
being
funded
and
so
on,
and
so
one
of
the
big
big
issues.
I
I
Here
is
the
amount
of
tec
tokens
that
we
receive
after
the
initial
buy.
We,
we
have
a
lot
less
tec
tokens
with
the
initial
buy
than
any
other
proposal
by
a
long
shot,
but
I
do
think
this
is
a
relative
because
of
the
the
token
price
at
that
time,
and
so
we
can
adjust
accordingly.
I
I
So
I
I
really
like
the
short
three
day
delegated
voting
period.
I
think
that
giving
delegates
three
days
and
letting
the
rest
of
the
community
adjust
accordingly,
if
they
disagree,
is
a
good
good
route
with
the
conviction
voting,
we
also
have
the
highest
conviction
growth,
which
enables
people
to
move
their
tokens
around
a
little
bit
more
than
forcing
them
to
stake
it
for
a
long
period
of
time.
I
In
order
to
pass
a
proposal,
you
got
that
and
a
high
spending
limit,
which
allows
us
to
spend
a
little
bit
more
on
each
of
the
proposals
that
are
being
submitted
and
then
once
again
this
in
the
bonding
curve.
Actually,
when
we
set
this
up,
we'll
have
a
little
bit
over
900
000
in
in
the
common
pool,
which
is
really
nice,
912
000..
I
So
it's
not
not
the
biggest
like
downside
for
that.
The
only
concern
people
may
have
is
the
reserve
ratio,
but
I
think
that
is
a
a
speculative
design
strategy
to
generate
more
phones
to
the
common
pool.
So
I
think
that
is
about
it.
In
my
defensive
420.
A
Great
work
10
seconds
left
that
I'll
just
carry
over
to
the
debate
period.
So
does
anyone
have
any
questions
for
nate
on
4
20.
H
Yeah,
I
have
a
question
I
was
thinking
about
this,
like
what
do
you
think
about
the
statement
that
420
might
be
the
least
likely
prone
to
technocracy,
because
the
automated
bonding
curve
might
may
not
be
permanent
and
therefore,
with
the
77
percentile
voting,
there
has
an
easier
likelihood
that
you
could
pass
a
proposal
to
say,
expand
the
token
amounts,
and
then
you
know
do
something
different
like
put
them
on
a
gnosis
auction
or
whatever,
but
that
that
that
that
towel
voting
is
sort
of
the
buffer
against
technocracy.
I
I
think
technocracy
is
kind
of
a
loaded
term.
I
think
that
you
know
if,
if
you
have
a
group
of
a
community
like
are
all
the
hatchers,
if
we
make
a
decision,
is
it
considered
technocratic?
I
I
don't
think
so
like.
I
think
that
when
you
limit
the
amount
of
decision,
the
decision
space
to
a
small
group
of
people
who
have
special
skills
in
certain
areas
and
they're
the
only
ones
making
decisions,
I
think
that
it
constitutes
a
technocratic
decision-making
system.
The
towel
voting
here,
I
think,
is
really
positive.
I
I
think
it
it.
It
has
a
low
support
required
a
little
bit
lower
minimum
quorum,
but
I
mean
yeah.
I
think
that
if
anybody
the
thing
about
the
tao
voting
is
that
when
you
we
change
something
to
the
dow.
This
is
a
big
change.
This
is
something
serious,
and
so
you
need
to
have
some
form
of
consensus,
and
so,
if
there's
a
anybody
who
disagrees
with
it,
we're
more
likely
going
to
you
know,
pass
it,
and
so
that
does
pose
a
couple
of
problems.
I
H
A
It
could
technically,
but
while
the
while,
the
bonding
curve
is
active,
that
would
screw
a
lot
of
things
up,
so
it
would
be
probably
unlikely
to
do
it.
It
would
be.
A
bad
idea
is
what
is
what
brett
and
sim
who
audited
the
bonding
curve
have
said,
but
we
might
turn
off
the
bonding
curve,
and
then
we
could
mean
tokens.
G
I
have
a
question,
and
you
were
saying
like
with
the
tribute
like.
The
intention
is
like
to
call
people
who
is
value
aligned,
but
the
thing
is
like
when
this
value
line
people
put
100k
into
the
bonding
curve.
They
only
receive
17,
almost
18k
of
tc,
which
is,
in
my
opinion,
very
low.
What
are
you
your
thoughts
on
that.
I
That
is
true.
You
know
if
they're
going
to
put
100,
000
and
they're
wanting
to
simply
speculate,
then
this
is
probably
not
a
good
time
to
put
a
hundred
thousand
in.
I
think
that
if
you
want
to
support
the
commons-
and
you
want
to
especially
early
on
in
the
bonding
curve
and
with
such
a
low
reserve
ratio,
we'll
have
a
lot
of
you
know
volatility
with
the
token.
I
So
I
think
that
if
you
are
going
to
put
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in,
you
should
probably
wait
unless
you
are
completely
value
aligned
and
you
want
to
make
sure
that
12
goes
to
the
common
pool
and
is
funded
in
public
goods.
I
think
that
is
a
good
way
to
do
it,
but
if
not,
I
you
know
in
the
high
exit
tribute
with
the
eight
percent.
You
know
for
us
to
change
this.
We
have
to
come
together
and
agree
on
something
you
know
if
we
want
to
sell
our
tokens
without
that
eight
percent
tax.
I
Well,
we
need
to
say:
hey,
let's,
let's
come
to
the
table
and
start
talking
about
what
we
want,
these
entry
and
x
attributes
to
end
up
looking
like,
but
but
I
think
the
twelve
and
eight
percent
is
a
really
good
value
to
have,
especially
early
on,
especially
during
the
token
freeze.
I
Yeah,
that
is,
that
is
the
big
thing,
but
so
65
000
is
significantly
less
than
any
other
proposal
that
the
dow
will
have
control
over,
but
the
but
it.
But
for
me
it's
relative,
because
the
price
is
at
a
higher
price
point,
and
so
we
we
would
just
distribute
less
for
the
for
our
working
groups
for
our
you
know,
bounties
and
whatnot.
So
to
me
it's
it's
all!
It's
all
kind
of
relative.
I
You
know
you
get
164
000
with
goldilocks,
but
it's
only
at
a
dollar
38,
a
pop
and
so
65
000
at
415
with
a
higher
volatility.
I
I
like
that.
That
scenario,
a
lot.
C
F
What
was
the
reasoning
behind
the
choice
on
the
reserve
ratio?
Number.
J
I
Yeah,
it
is
very
low
compared
to
others,
and
the
reserve
ratio
is
just
going
to
describe
basically
how
volatile
the
token
price
is
with
buys
and
sells
onto
the
bonding
curve.
So
we
wanted
to
have
a
high
higher
price
and
but
still
maintain
the
amount
of
funds
in
the
common
pool
at
launch.
In
order
to
do
that,
we
had
to
have
a
lower
reserve
ratio,
and
so
we
have
a
70
commons
tribute
and
so
that
that
results
in
that
low
ratio.
The
benefit
of
this
is
kind
of
strategic.
I
In
that
you
know
it,
you
might
have
a
lot
of
ups
and
downs
with
the
price,
but
most
of
the
people
that
are
going
to
be
interacting
with
the
with
the
bonding
curve
in
general,
especially
after
we
place
this
token
on
secondary
markets
is
going
to
be
arbitrage
opportunities,
and
so
it
actually
encourages
more
arbitrage
opportunities
because
of
the
volatility
on
the
bonding
curve
compared
to
the
price
on
secondary
markets,
which
will
generate
more
funds
to
the
common
pool.
A
And
thank
you
to
everyone,
who's,
asking
questions
and
participating.
It's
hard.
It's
hard
in
this
big
group
of
people
to
ask
questions
but
really
appreciate
it
and
let's
pass
it
over
to
the
marxist
vlad.
Yes,
mitch
is
here
mitch.
Would
you
like
to
present
bolshevik's
gambit,
I'm
gonna
put
six
minutes
on
the
clock
and
and
then
you
know
ask
that
you
especially
highlight
the
differences
between
your
proposal
and
other
proposals.
J
Sure
thing
thanksgiv
is
this:
something
that
I
should
share
screen.
Are
you
just
gonna
follow
along?
Oh.
A
A
J
All
right:
well,
let's
have
a
look
here
so
sure
we'll
start
at
the
top
going
from
the
first
module
here.
We've
got
the
token
freeze
in
tokentha.
J
J
J
You
know
my
my
best
guess
for
the
vest
and
after
that
we
really
need
to
consider
the
concept
of
the
the
trusted
seed
and
how
we
have
a
vetted
list
of
people
that
we
invited
to
participate
in
the
hatch
round,
and
so
I
don't
think
we
should
add,
like
extraneous
restrictions
by
having
long
vesting
periods.
J
So,
for
that
I
have
a
short
token
freeze
of
12
weeks
and
then
just
a
one
year
thaw
and
then
through
that
we
could
be
done
and
over
with
the
vesting
in
less
than
a
year
and
a
half
and
moving
on
from
that
going
to
the
abc
oops
moving
away
there.
J
Looking
at
this,
I
chose
a
dollar
similar
to
goldilocks.
You
know
comments
tribute
same
similar
and
again
that
20,
which
seems
to
be
kind
of
the
standard
that
we
started
out
with
in
terms
of
price
volatility
from
the
reserve
ratio
and
oh
the
reserve
at
launch
changed.
Oh
that's
with
the
you
added
in
the
initial,
buy
there
griff
right.
This
is
why
this
is
different.
A
J
Okay,
cool
well
yeah.
The
main
thing
is
that
we
wanted
to
get
way
over.
You
know
that
600
700
mark
that
we
were
seeing
earlier
on
the
proposals
and
we
realized
that,
like
900k,
you
know.
Sometimes
a
million
will
be
really
good
for
us
because
realize
that
we
want
to
fund
a
lot
of
things.
So
it's
really
important
to
have
that
900k
mark
and
keeping
the
reserve
at
launch
relatively
low.
J
You
know
only
30
percent
going
in
there
will
give
us
a
little
bit
of
like
price
volatility
action
at
the
beginning,
which
is
fun,
but
then,
as
our
dow
matures
we
kind
of
get
more
into
a
reserve
balance
and
the
token
price
will
stabilize,
because
we've
got
a
good
reserve
ratio
in
there
and
we've
got
the
dollar
47
minting
price.
The
public
price
attribute
and
a
good
market
cap
of
just
over
three
million,
so
I'd
see,
has
a
lot
of
similarities
with
goldilocks.
J
J
I
honestly
don't
have
much
to
say
regarding
the
market
caps,
but
if
we
move
on
to
the
initial
buy
here
and
where's
our
third
one
there,
it
is
right
there,
thanks
into
the
towel
voting
here,
88.8
tried
and
true
for
support
required
in
minimum
quorum,
and
the
really
thing
here
that
I
want
to
point
out
is
that
basically,
these
parameters
for
the
dow
voting
are
all
set
up,
so
that
we
could
be
done
over
with
a
vote
in
one
week.
J
So
a
vote
duration
of
six
days
and
an
execution
delay
of
one
day
if
there's
any
contention
or
any
kind
of
like
discongruence
between
delegates
and
regular
voters
and
there's
a
flipped
vote,
we
add
in
a
generous
three
days
to
the
voting
time
and
really
the
cool
thing
here
is.
I
want
to
get
into
the
cv
parameters
and
so
for
gambit
we've
got
seven
day.
Conviction
growth.
J
I
think
griff
made
really
excellent
arguments
for
how
conviction
growth
works
and
just
kind
of
like
framing
how
you
know
things
kind
of
get
stale
after
one
month.
So
realistically
conviction
should
peak
out
at
that
one
month,
point
so
four
weeks,
minimum
conviction.
Four
spending
limit
eleven,
and
so
this
is
kind
of
the
the
iron
curtain.
This
is
the
meme
that
I
was
selling
of
the
iron
curtain
for
the
the
bolsheviks,
gambit,
where
we
have.
J
Oh,
I
see
it's
divvied
up
by
here
we
go
so
this
is
bolshevik's
gambit
data
here,
and
so
you
can
see
that
it
actually
takes
quite
a
bit
of
tokens
to
get
small
amounts.
You
know
where,
like
their
one
day,
eight
hours
was
like
impossible
like.
If
you
look
on
the
dashboard
here,
you
guys
can
see
that
eight
hours
is
like
forget
it
it's
not
happening.
J
But
then,
if
we
go
to
similar
proposals
like
at
the
two
week,
the
one
month
mark,
it
still
takes
quite
a
bit
of
tokens
to
get
decent
sized
funding
proposals
and-
and
in
the
case
of
like,
if
it
really
isn't
a
good
proposal,
we
always
have
to
remember
that
we
can
just
challenge
this
stuff.
You
know
like,
if
they're
just
bad
proposals,
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
like
run
off
with
the
money
that
we
have
a
mechanism
in
place
for
dow
voting
and
conviction
voting
to
challenge
this
stuff.
J
J
I
think
it'll
be
reasonable
to
expect
that
we
won't
really
see
funding
requests
coming
out
of
that
dow
for
under
10k.
If
we're
talking
about
token
engineering
and
salaries
and
all
that
stuff
like
realistically,
I
think
we're
going
to
be
around
the
the
20
to
50k
mark
for
funding
proposals
and
that's
pretty
much
all
the
modules
that
I
wanted
to
cover
for
the
bolsheviks.
Gambit.
A
Well
done
nice
timing.
Would
anyone
like
to
ask
any
questions
about
bolshevik's
gambit.
K
C
K
J
Well,
this
is,
this:
is
the
power
of
communism.
You
know
so
I
mean
really
like
not
creating
this
crazy.
This
crazy
capitalist
cell
pressure-
you
know
of
having
these
like
super
high
token
prices
that
people
just
want
to
like
come
in
and
you
know,
play
the
casino
and
sell
out,
and
you
know
so.
I
think
the
temptation
is
too
great
to
like
set
this
token
price
to
something
crazy,
and
I
think
you
know
you
went
in
with
the
dollar.
J
K
J
K
K
Yeah,
it's
true
and
I
feel
valued
by
that.
A
Any
any
any
more
questions,
three
minutes,
30
seconds
left
to
talk
about
bolshevik
scan,
but
I.
G
J
Yeah
a
great
point
zepty,
I
I
kind
of
got
lost
on
the
on
the
voter's
pamphlet
there.
But
if
we
go
back
to
our
augmented
bonding
curve,
we
have
the
eight
percent
entry
in
the
exit,
ten
percent.
J
So
I
would
like
to
just
point
out
that
these
will
be
set
up
for
the
first
three
months
of
the
abc
being
open.
You
know
capture
the
hype
of
people
jumping
into
this
new
economy,
collecting
funds
that
will
go
back
to
our
common
pool
and
then,
after
that,
three-month
mark,
we
would
hit
something.
That's
more
reasonable,
like
two
to
three
percent
equal
entry,
as
well
as
the
exit
tribute.
H
Just
more
on
the
the
price,
but
it's
more
a
focus
on
the
your
point
as
to
the
optimization
of
the
actual
pool
for
the
value-aligned
token
engineering.
So
do
you
think?
Because
it's
because
the
entry
and
exits
are
percentages,
do
you
think
that
having
a
price
of
a
dollar
will
get
you?
H
I
mean
more
more
volume
that
will
make
up
for
the
lower
price
that
will
then
drive
more
funds
into
the
pool
is
if
you
were
to
start
with
a
higher
price,
because,
as
a
percentage
you
know,
a
percentage
of
us
of
a
higher
price
will
get
you
more
absolute
funds
in
the
pool.
So
I
was
just
curious
on
your
strategy
for
the
perceived
demand
you
expect.
J
I
think
there's
some
some
like
background
psychological
stuff
happening
when
it.
You
know,
we
see
the
opening
price
coming
out
a
dollar
and
you
know
after
the
initial
buy
it'll,
be
a
dollar
forty
seven,
so
it
like
it
can
be
perceived
as
more
appealing
to
jump
into
the
market
at
the
beginning
because
it
feels
like
the
price
is
lower.
J
So
you,
of
course,
that's
all.
That's
all
relative
to
like
the
other
settings
as
well,
and
you
know
how
the
price
volatility
will
react
with
the
lower
reserve
balance,
but
I
think
in
general,
keeping
it
lower
will
increase
the
buy
pressure
at
the
beginning.
A
So
this
this
proposal
is
really
close
to
goldilocks
is:
are
there
any
things
that
you
want
to
especially
point
out,
so
when
people
have
to
decide
between
bolsheviks,
gambit
and
goldilocks,
what
they
why
they
should
pick
bolshevik's
gambit.
J
The
vesting
to
me
seems
like
the
most
distinct
difference.
I
can
say
it's
about
four:
what
was
it
14
weeks
shorter?
I
think
I
said
and.
F
J
A
Fantastic
well,
there's
only
seven
seconds
left
so
leave
it
at
that,
and
just
one
more
quick
interlude
before
lauren
takes
on
goldilocks.
What
first
round
of
applause
for
the
marxist
chad?
He
did
it
without
memes,
which
is
a
hard
hard
sell,
hard,
really
tough,
because
this
probably
has
the
best
you.
A
A
A
Right
they're,
making
the
rest
of
us
feel
like
capitalist,
chats,
but
so
yeah
round
of
applause
for
mitch.
Thank
you
so
much
the
marxist
flat
himself
coming
through,
and
I
want
to
just.
I
really
encourage
everyone
to.
We
have
a
few
open
adjustable
dates.
You
know
everyone's
all
over
the
world
with
busy
schedules
in
the
params
channel.
I
just
put
three
doodles
out
one
that
is
for
the
final
pram
debate
on
wednesday
and
two
that
are
for
fireside
chats.
A
One
set
of
fireside
chats
is
really
targeted
at
being
finding
times
that
are
friendly
for
asia
and
europe
and
then
another
one
is
for
asia
and
the
us,
because
we
really
leave
out
a
lot
of
people
who
are
on
the
on
on
that
side
of
the
world.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there
are
some
times
that
you
guys
can
get
more
informed
about
this
vote.
If
you
want
to
learn
about
all
of
these
things,
so
please
go
in
the
doodle.
A
We
are
going
to
pick
the
the
time
for
the
for
the
next
ones
by
the
end
of
the
day
today.
So
if
you
care
about
coming
to
more
of
these
things,
go
into
that
doodle
tell
us
when
you
want
your
you
when
you
want
to
sort
out
something
for
tomorrow
and
the
next
day
and
and
we'll
set
it
up.
So
there's
three
doodles
check
them
out
and
you
can
vote
right
now.
How
great
is
that
okay,
so
last
one
is
lauren
lauren.
Do
you
want?
Are
you
ready
to
show
off
goldilocks.
L
Okay,
cool
goldilocks,
so
the
premise
of
goldilocks
is
really
to
find
the
right
balance
in
between
extremes.
Goldilocks
is
all
about,
like
you
know,
not
too
hot,
not
too
cold,
but
choosing
what's
just
right.
So
I
think
this
proposal
is
just
right
in
the
module
one.
L
The
opening
price
is
one
dollar
which,
after
you
know,
after
the
initial
buy,
the
price
moves
up
to
a
dollar
and
38
cents,
so
hatchers
are
still
getting
like
almost
40
profit
on
their
initial
investment
right
out
of
the
gate,
but
it
has
a
six
month
token
freeze.
Basically,
I
think
this
is
a
good
amount
of
time
to
have
the
the
vested
tokens,
because
it
really
gives
us
a
chance
after
the
commons
upgrade
to
start
moving
ahead
and
funding
proposals
and
actually
like
building
even
more
credibility.
That
adds
a
lot
of
value.
L
L
Moving
on
to
the
augmented
body
curve,
oops,
so
goldilocks,
opening
price
of
one
dollar
and
the
with
with
the
initial
buy
we're
ending
up
with
roughly
one
million
dollars
in
the
commonwealth,
similar
to
most
of
the
proposals.
One
kind
of
contentious
thing
is
this:
the
entry
tribute
being
22
percent,
but
something's
important
to
consider
is
that
the
this?
It's
really
the
spread
that
matters
with
the
entertainment
and
exit
tributes.
L
It's
like
the
total
amount
that's
being
taken
off
so
goldilocks
is
the
tribute
spread
is
24
in
comparison
to
420,
which
is
20
percent
and
gambit,
which
is
18.
So
it's
only
a
little
bit
higher.
I
like
the
high
entry
tubu
because
it
really
actually
starts
bringing
funds
into
the
common
pool
like
in
the
early
days.
We're
not
really
going
to
be
needing
more
funds
coming
into
our
reserve,
but
having
a
way
to
be
generating
more
funds
to
the
common
pool
is
really
important.
L
It's
realistically
only
going
to
take
like
a
month
or
so
until
pools
are
being
set
up
on
honey
swap
or
other
exchanges,
and
people
aren't
even
going
to
be
using
the
augmented
bonding
curve
at
all.
So
I
think
it's
like
when
we
first
launched
the
augmented
bonding
curve,
it's
an
opportunity
for
us
to
be
generating
funds.
L
Here
and
you're,
okay,
cool,
I'm
putting
in
one
die:
okay,
cool,
I'm
getting
60
tc
test,
tec
tokens,
so
it's
it's
really
like
people
have
the
option
of
choosing
like
what
they,
how
much
they're
willing
to
put
in
in
order
to
get
the
tec
tokens,
and
I
think,
like
anybody,
who's
keeping
up
with
the
tac
and,
following
with
the
the
params
debates,
and
just
like
this
entire
conversation,
can
understand
the
justification
for
the
entry
to
it
as
being
like
in
order
to
fund
more
token
engineer,
proposals.
L
It's
like
we
want
more
funds
in
the
common
pool,
so
we
can
fund
more
proposals
and
actually
be
furthering
our
mission
of
advancing
token
engineering.
I
think
it's
also
really
really
reasonable,
because
I
think
that
people,
it
also
is
like
a
insurance
that
we're
getting
more
value
aligned.
People
coming
in
because,
like
the
people
who
dig
deeper,
are
like
oh,
I'm,
actually
paying
a
tribute
to
the
common
pool
to
fund
this
project
that
I
want
so
that,
like
their,
their
entire
community
can
succeed
and
the
entire
mission
can
succeed.
L
So
I
think
it
like
really
brings
people
in
who
are
in
line
with
with
the
tec
yeah.
So
that's.
L
Cool
I'm
gonna,
just
like
keep
burning
through.
So,
as
the
has
been
mentioned,
there's
the
goldilocks
and
bolsheviks
gambit
are
pretty
similar
proposals.
One
thing
that
sets
them
apart
is
goldilocks.
Has
this
okay?
They
both
have
a
pretty
swift
vote.
Duration,
quiet,
ending
period,
goldilocks
has
a
five-day
vote
duration
and,
if
there's
a
quiet,
ending
extension,
it's
like
the
the
total
period
goes
to
seven
days
with
the
execution
delay
a
week
and
a
half
or.
E
L
A
week
and
half
a
day
with
the
execution
delay,
but
something
that
I
really
like
is
that
the
delegated
voting
period
overlaps
with
the
quiet
ending
period,
so
there's
three
days,
delegate
vote
appearing
three
days:
quiet,
ending
period
and
a
total
five-day
voteration.
I
think
you
can
probably
see
this
better
here
yeah,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
that
the
the
the
delegated
voting
period
overlaps
at
the
quiet
ending
period,
the
quiet
ending
period
here.
L
So
that
means
that,
if
there's
contention
in
the
delegates
votes,
the
delegates
are
able
to
actually
trigger
a
quiet,
ending
extension
which
basically
allows
more
time
for
people
to
like
check
their
delegates,
votes
and
potentially
change
them
or
more
people
to
come
into
a
contentious
vote.
So
I
think
that
this
is
really
good,
but
still
we're
getting
through
through
proposals
just
over
a
week.
Yeah,
and
I
think
that
the
you
know
the
support
required
was
lowered.
A
touch
to
85,
which
again,
I
think
is
important.
I
think,
like
lowering
our
support
required.
L
A
little
bit
is
really
good
because
we're
getting
a
bunch
of
people
in
after
we
do
the
tc.
It's
not
really
only
going
to
be
the
trusted
seed.
It's
going
to
be
people
who
have
liquid
tokens
they're
able
to
sell
them
whenever
they
want,
unlike
the
hatches,
still
have
their
tokens
fasted.
So
I
think,
having
a
little
bit
lower
of
a
support
required,
but
still
you
know,
only
15
of
the
votes
could
could
be
saying.
L
No,
I
think
that
that's
super
nice,
so
I'll
move
on
to
conviction,
voting
in
conviction,
voting
something
to
keep
in
mind
is
that
four
times
the
conviction.
Growth
is
like
really
where
you're
topping
out
on
like
maximum
conviction,
because,
like
the
the
conviction,
the
rate
it
increase
decreases
over
time,
I
think
there's
a
nice
yeah.
You
can
see
that,
like
over
time,
your
conviction
grows
at
a
slower
rate.
L
So
after
about
a
month
you're
kind
of
tapping
out
on
your
conviction,
I
think
this
is
really
important,
because
proposals
that
are
there
for
over
a
month
kind
of
gets
stale
and
like
not
really
relevant
to
the
comments
anymore.
So
it's
like,
after
a
month,
the
tokens
that
are
actively
voting
on
it,
like
won't,
continue
increasing
so
much
conviction
that
it
will
actually
push
it
to
pass
like
the
main
difference
between
both
of
its
gambit
and
goldilocks
is
really
only
this
funding
limit
a
little
bit
lower
for
goldilocks.
L
So
we
still
benefit
from
this
like
iron
curtain
at
the
very
beginning,
so
proposals
can't
pass
within
like
eight
hours
and
it's
pretty
tough
to
pass
within
one
day.
But
when
you
look
at
a
week
you're
starting
to
pass
like
six
percent
seven
percent
proposals
and
with
increasing
the
common
pool,
this
becomes
quite
reasonable.
Okay,
thanks.
A
A
I
I
can
start
off
with
one.
One
thing
I
noticed
is
that
it
has
the
highest
minting
price
to
durgadoss's
point
it's
it's
the
second
highest
price,
second
highest
market
cap
and
the
second
highest
minting
price.
Because
of
the
commons,
the
entry
tribute
it's
in
the
voter
pamphlet
on
the
the
one
that
has
all
the
bonding
curve
ones
slide
14..
A
So
what
do
you?
What
do
you
think
about
the
that
opening
that
opening
price
and
how
people
will
interact
with
goldilocks
via
you
know,
buying
the
token
and
how
they'll
feel
about
buying
that
and
with
paying
the
entry
tribute.
L
Well,
I
think
that
I
mean
this:
is
the
price
that's
available
to
the
public?
Really,
so
people
are
coming
in
and
being
able
to
see?
Oh,
I
can
buy
the
token
for
1.77,
which
does
increase
our
overall
market
cap,
which
makes
it
have
the
appearance
of
an
economy
that
has
more
value.
Something
you'd
want
to
invest
in,
but
it's
still
not
like
so
high
and
over
inflated
that
we
like,
through
our
reserve
ratio
out
the
window
and
like
made
the
currency
super
volatile.
L
But
this
is
like
the
the
disadvantage,
I
think
with
like
making
the
opening
price
itself
very
high.
When
you
make
the
opening
price
itself
very
high,
then
you
end
up
with
a
reserve
ratio-
that's
very
low.
So
then,
as
more
tokens
are
getting
minted,
the
the
hashers
tokens,
like
the
people
minting
tokens,
are
pushing
the
price
up
so
quickly
that
they
can't
really
buy
as
many
tokens
that
the
hackers
are
having
initially.
This
is
like
the
main
disadvantage
of
having
a
low
reserve
ratio.
L
In
my
opinion,
it
makes
it
really
prohibitive
to
new
members
coming
into
the
community
buying
in
and
then
having
like
sufficient
governance
rights,
but
with
the
entry
tribute
it
has
the
valuation
at
the
beginning.
So
it's
actually
like
having
a
higher
market
cap,
which
creates
this
like
this.
L
This
idea
that
oh,
the
tc
already
has
a
3.5
million
dollar
market
cap
right
out
of
the
gate
and
and
plus
they
have
a
bonding
curve
plus,
like
the
reserve
ratio,
is
22,
which
means
they're
20,
so
the
token's
not
too
volatile
and
there's
some
collateral
backing.
If
there's
stability,
I
think
it's
like
really
really
good
token
engineering
and
also
takes
advantage
of
this,
like
us,
valuing
ourselves
concept.
K
Thanks
for
pointing
that
out,
because
those
are
things
I
did
not
quite
realize
about
the
when
you
say
hi
I
mean
I'm,
you
know
I
just
don't
think
10's
that
high,
but
you
know
everyone
has
decided
that
like
one
is
what
we're
doing
and
there
are
no
choices
other
than
the
four,
so
you
know
so
I
was
just
trying
to
understand.
Why
is
that?
And
what.
L
C
K
Okay,
so
yeah,
I
was
just
thinking
that
oh
great
we're,
gonna,
basically
we're
coining
a
coin
and
everyone's
gonna
be
thinking
a
dollar,
it's
worthless
and
it's
a
red
flag
for
investors,
and
why
would
I
wanna
there's
a
millions
that
you
could
buy
for
a
dollar?
So
it's
not
that
you
know
so
that
was
my
concern.
K
Was
I
heard
a
bunch
of
that
and
that
just
stuck
with
me,
more
than
any
other
single
thing
that
came
out
of
the
parameters
debates
was
that
if
we
don't
value
ourselves
more
than
a
dollar,
people
aren't
going
to
buy
the
token
in
the
secondary
market,
and
that
was
a
concern
that
I
was
worried
about.
But
I
see
that
that
is
obviated
somewhat
by
the
reserve
being
able
to
pad
the
reserve.
K
D
Yeah,
I
also
had
a
question
primarily
about
the
entry
and
exit
tribute,
and
this
came
up.
Actually,
I
think
I
was
reading
through
one
of
the
other
proposals
I
forget
which
one
at
this
point,
but
someone
raised
a
good
point
that
how
difficult
do
we
think
it's
going
to
be
to
change
the
entry
and
exit
tribute?
I
know
I
think
goldilocks
had
sort
of
a
four
percent
per
a
certain
period
that
we
were
thinking.
We
would
kind
of
reverse
the
entry
and
exit
to
be
rather
than
22
and
two.
D
I
think
it
would
end
up
somewhere,
like
I
don't
remember
the
numbers
exactly.
D
Was
it
like
10
and
12,
or
something
like
that,
but
I'm
curious,
because
I
saw
in
that
other
post
that
all
of
those
votes
would
have
to
go
through
and
would
those
votes
have
to
go
through
with
tao
voting
at
like
90
and
I'm
curious
the
sort
of
interest
in
token
holders,
as
the
point
made
in
the
post
in
increasing
the
tax
on
their
own
holdings
are,
do
we
feel
there
is
interest
in
the
tec
to
change
these
taxes
and
sorry,
the
the
tribute
entry
and
exit
tribute
and
also,
if
we
do,
is
it
at
the
90
percent
quorum
that
we
need
to
have
everyone
agree
or
are
we
going
to
phrase
it
sort
of
the
other
way
and
say
hey?
D
This
is
the
plan
we
are
going
to
change
these
four
percent
every
six
months
or
so,
and
then
the
vote
has
to
go
to
change
that.
So
I'm
just
curious
with
this
90
quorum
and
the
entry
and
exit
tributes
quite
high.
Do
we
feel
there's
an
appetite
for
changing
those,
and
if
so,
will
that
be
possible
or
will
that
be
really
difficult?.
L
Yeah
totally
so,
actually
the
I
mean
for
the
dow
voting
params
for
for
goldilocks,
the
quorum's
10.
So
that's
like
10
percent
of
all
of
the
tokens
need
to
be
voting
on
that
proposal
in
order
for
it
to
pass.
Sorry
need
to
be
voting
yes
on
that
proposal
in
order
for
it
to
pass,
and
then
85
percent
of
all
the
tokens
who
voted
on
that
proposal
need
to
go
yeah.
L
So
it's
not
quite
90
like
and
one
thing
one
idea
with
goldilocks
was
to
lower
the
support
required
a
little
bit
in
comparison
to
the
hatch
style,
where
we
have
it
88,
because
we
want
to
be
able
to
pass
these
down
votes
in
order
to
change
the
entry
and
exit
tributes
but
yeah.
So
the
the
philosophy
with
goldilocks
is
to
have
every
month
to
be
voting
to
decrease
the
entry
tribute
by
four
and
increase
the
exit
tribute
by
two.
L
I
highlighted
the
part
in
here,
and
so
eventually,
after
five
months,
you
have
an
entry
tribute
of
two
percent
and
an
exit
tribute
of
12.
That
being
said,
a
dow
vote
would
need
to
be
passed
every
month
in
order
for
that
to
actually
happen.
So
it's
like,
we
can't
like
set
it
up
beforehand,
where
it's
like
we've
set
it
up
for
every
month.
That
happens.
It's
like,
I
think
a
dow
vote
has
to
pass
in
order
for
us
to
change
the
parameters
every
time
so
yeah.
L
So
it's
something
that
we
would
need
to
have
like
community
agreement
on,
and
I
think
that
this
is
like
something
that
would
be
also
interesting.
That
would
come
up
into
governance.
Discussions
later
is,
like
the
you
know,
the
main
contentious
point
about
goldilocks
is
the
high
entry
tribute
and
then
the
the
people
are
probably
going
to
want
to
be
lowering.
I
don't
think
we're
going
to
have
a
huge
problem
of
of
lowering
the
entry
tribute
and
get
a
vote
to
pass
with
that,
especially
with
new
people
coming
in.
L
So
I
I
don't
I
I
wouldn't
say
that
for
sure
we'll
follow
this
flow,
that
every
month
of
it
will
pass
and
that
this
will
happen.
But
it
is
the
the
philosophy
and
that
like
if
the
community
decides
that
these
tributes
are
too
high
and
that
we
don't
like
it.
We
don't
like
the
taste
of
that.
It's
relatively
easier
to
pass
downwards,
like
the
dow
votes
we
have
for
goldilocks.
L
Are,
you
know
they're
done
in
a
week
and
a
half
if
it's
contentious,
they're
done
in
five
days,
if
it's
not
contentious,
so
I
think
that
this
is
really
an
opportunity,
as
a
community
to
have
like
governance
discussions
and
further
the
conversation
of
entering
exit
tributes
and
it's
all
sort
of
built
into
the
proposal
as
making
that
possible.
A
Yeah
well
we're
out
of
time
that
was
fantastic.
That
was
a
fantastic
presentation
of
goldilocks.
Let's
give
lauren
a
round
of
applause.
Well
done
well
done.
A
So,
and,
and
with
that,
I
just
want
to
pass
it
to
the
people
who
didn't
present
and
didn't
have
much
chance
to
talk
to
her
if
they
had
any
favorites
or
things
that
they
thought
were
interesting.
We
have
only
seven
minutes,
so
I'm
just
gonna
pass
it
around
and
put
a
30
second
timer
for
everybody,
and
maybe
I'll
actually
start
with
jeff.
Since
you
already
got
your
camera
up,
did
you
have
anything
that
caught
your
eye?
Any
were
your
you
were
started
as
undecided?
Did
you
have
one
that
especially
sounded
interesting.
D
Yeah,
so
I
mean
a
lot
of
the
sort
of
area
that
I've
been
looking
into
lately.
Is
you
know
around
the
interaction
between
a
primary
market,
bonding
curve
like
the
abc
and
secondary
market
bonding
curves,
which
we've
talked
about?
You
know
that
would
be
set
up
on
uniswap
sushi
swap
honeyswap.
You
know
whatever
chains
that
end
up
getting
launched
on,
so
I'm
really
curious.
D
I
guess
one
of
the
kind
of
bigger
areas
that
I'm
looking
to
evaluate
these
proposals
is
the
tribute
spread
because
the
wider,
the
spread,
the
wider,
the
kind
of
envelope
we
have
between
the
buy
and
the
cell,
that
the
secondary
market
can
have
a
lot
of
action,
and
I'm
you
know
just
from
what
I've
seen
on
some
protocols
that,
if
there's
a
large
wedge
a
lot
like
a
big
difference
between
the
buy
and
the
cell,
in
other
words,
the
the
percentage
the
tribute
spread.
D
I
guess
there's
a
lot
of
play
for
the
secondary
market
to
increase
and
decrease
in
price
without
any
action
on
the
on
the
primary
market.
D
So
that's
anyway,
I'll
allow
other
people
to
to
voice
their
thoughts,
but
that's
kind
of
one
of
the
areas
that
I'm
looking
at
with
with
a
lot
of
kind
of
interest
and
and
yeah
I'll,
be
thinking
a
bit
more
about
that
about
how
large
tribute
spread
versus
small
tribute
spread
and
how
that
may
play
into
more
continuous
funding
for
the
abc
with
a
smaller
spread.
So
that's
kind
of
where
I'm
I'm
focusing
a
lot
of
my
attention
at
the
moment.
A
Nice,
that's
super
cool,
well,
I'll,
pass
it
to
ann
brodie.
Did
you
have
you
were
undecided
as
well?
Did
you
have
a
one
that
stood
out.
C
I'm
going
to
pass
for
now.
That's
okay,.
A
M
A
Well,
thank
you
for
coming
absolutely
how
about
you
krypto
muppet.
Do
you
have
any
any
ideas,
frederick
that
that
you
want
to
share.
F
Well,
I
was
kind
of
curious
about
the
the
price
and
I
think
yogurt
has
brought
that
up,
that
you
know,
there's
not
that
many
options
outside
of
the.
I
think
the
420
for
the
high
price
if
you're
looking,
but
at
the
same
time
it
dashes
to
the
reserve
parameter
and
I'm
kind
of
trying
to
come
to
term
with
that
and
and
trying
to
figure
out
where
it
sits.
So
I
guess
it's
a
matter
of
stability
right.
F
A
Nice
and
danny
did
you:
were
you
swayed
by
any
of
these
proposals
or
any
concepts
that
you
wanted.
C
I
got
a
swing
by.
I
was
swayed
by
everybody
and
I
started
out
like
going
yeah.
Oh
s,
baby,
that's
it
and
I'm
like
wow
nate
suit,
made
some
great
points
and
by
the
end,
I'm
like
yeah.
I
really
love
what
lauren's
saying
about
building
in
governance.
Participation
like
that
like
having
a
strategy
in
place
to
really
encourage
people
to
to
look
and
see
what's
happening
and
then
vote
on
a
monthly
basis
in
place
to
make
those
changes.
I
I'm
undecided
right
now,
yeah.
I
really
enjoyed
hearing
the
differences
in
the
pitch.
A
Nice,
well,
don't
be
afraid
to
vote
in
that
those
doodles
just
tell
us
when
the
next
one
is
best
for
you
and
thanks
danny
what
about
you,
marco
decentralized
sdgs,
do
you
have.
H
Anyway,
although
I
and
I
do
think
there
is
a
potential-
if
it
becomes
this
technocracy
that
when
you
close
the
bonding
curve,
you
could
always
have
not
another
mechanism
through
the
tile
voting
where
they
could
expand
the
token
pool
and
do
it
through
another
mechanism
like
on
an
auction
to
widen
the
governance.
If
that
was
an
issue,
and
I,
but
so
I
I
just
find
the
attractiveness
of
of
higher
price
and
percentages
having
the
potential
to
to
actually
attract
people
that
will
then
actually
bring
in
very
nice
large
funding
for
the
commons
pool.
H
I
also
do
think
that,
as
the
price
goes
up,
volatility
has
the
psychological
effect
of
the
price
will
go
up
in
large
quick
amounts
which
could
actually
drive
more
demand,
and
then
I
think
that
actually
will
then
bring
in
further
funding
for
the
comments
pool.
So
but
of
course,
I
I
loved
all
the
proposals.
I
think
it's
been
a
well
thought
out.
So
thanks.
Everyone.
A
Thanks
decentralized,
what
about
grail
did
you
have
any
thing
to
add.
A
C
Cool
well
this.
This
is
my
first
time
getting
it
stuff,
so
I
I
don't
know
if
I
can
much
but
like
when
I
think
about
as
a
first
dow,
that's
oriented
towards
token.
C
D
C
That
a
bit
of
a
comment
and
like
technocrats
out
inside
of
the
hatcher's
outside
in
the
general
market-
I
I
guess
knows
right,
but
I
do
like
the
idea
of
a
high
entry
price
because,
if
you're
getting
in
then
you're
getting
in
and
working
and
it's
going
towards
project-
and
you
know
it's
going
towards
projects
that
I
think
that's
my
main
comment.
A
Nice
thanks
rail
and
durgados.
Did
you
have
a
quick
we're
over
time
so
just
keep
it
to
30
seconds
for
sure.
Do
you
have
a
favorite
one?
I
I
think
I
know.
K
I
still
wish
I
had
a
diversity
of
pricing
options
among
the
the
the
ones,
but
I
I
kind
of
appreciate
you
know
what
lauren
was
saying
and
I'm
maybe
less
worried
about
it
now.
Even
so,
I
still
think
four
is
a
pretty
low
valuation
in
terms
of
things
you
know,
so
I
I
wish
some
you
know.
I
love
all
the
different
things
about
each
and
every
one
of
the
the
options,
but
I
just
wish
there
was
some
price
diversion
deviations
that
I
could
vote
on
too.
So
thanks.
A
Nice
thanks
durgardass,
how
about
you
ivy
did
you
were
you
swayed
by
any
of
these
proposals?
Is
anyone
is
any
one
of
them
something
you
want
to
highlight.
C
L
A
Nice,
how
about
you
maria,
do
you
have
any
that
are
math,
or
do
you
have
any
that
are
coming
up
for
you
that
you
especially
like.
C
A
F
A
Was
awesome,
thank
you
pab.
What
about
you
santi
did
you
have
any
anything
to
add
is.
Did
any
of
the
proposals
stand
out
to
you.
A
Oh
santi
may
be
afk
I'll,
come
back
to
you,
santi.
If
you
get
a
chance
to
unmute
and
what
we
have
sen
ryu
did
you
have
any
anything
you
wanted
to
add.
A
Oh
another
one
having
trouble
get
that
mute
button.
If
either
of
you
guys
just
unmute
and
mute
I'll,
be
watching
and
then
I'll
know
you
can
you
can
actually
talk.
Tam
did
you
have
anything
to
add
you
didn't
get
to
any
of
these
proposals,
especially
stand
out
to
you.
C
Well,
I
guess
I
have
to
say
that
I
thought
nate
did
a
really
great
job
of
presenting
poor
tony
that
was
really
cool
to
see
and
that
yeah
it
was
like.
It's
super
interesting
to
hear
all
of
these.
It
might
be
the
first
time
I
heard
all
of
them.
At
the
same
time,
I
guess
the
one
thing
I
want
to
share
is
like
the
vesting
period.
I
think
really
makes
a
big
difference,
and
you
know
if
we
look
at
this
like
it's.
C
A
startup
right,
like
a
bunch
of
a
bunch
of
people,
have
gotten
together
and
just
pulled
together
these
funds,
and
you
know
now
we
have
now
we
have
now.
The
mission
starts
right
and
the
idea
is
that
if
you
just
raise
capital-
and
you
have
12
weeks
or
26
weeks
to
accomplish
something-
it
seems
unrealistic.
I
really
think
that,
like
having
a
long
vesting
period
and
a
low
time,
preference
for
the
hatchers
is
is
strategically
wise
to
to
achieve
what
we're
hoping
to
achieve
here.
C
A
Nice
and
doga
good
to
see
you
here
unquail
did
you
have
anything
that
saved
you
especially.
M
A
Thanks
doga
and
it's
optimus
finishing
us
finish
us
off.
G
G
Wanna,
like
nate,
did
a
fantastic
job
with
420.
I
really
think
like
you,
like
it
yeah,
but
my
favorite,
like
I
don't
know
now,
I'm
thinking
like
ostrom
perfect,
like
I
need.
A
Well
said:
well,
there
are
more,
there
are
more
check
out
the
parameters
channel
for
doodles,
so
you
can
help
us
pick
a
time
that
works
for
you.
If
you
want
to
come
to
another
debate,
there
is
one
tonight
in
about
seven
hours,
zargham's
gonna
be
there,
so
it
should
be
interesting.
A
It's
not
a
classical
debate,
more
of
a
fireside
chat,
so
we
will
just
discuss
the
parameters
and
concepts
in
a
more
open
format,
which
should
be
interesting
that
I'll
be
leading
and
actually
tomorrow
morning
for
us,
so
the
one
in
seven
hours
obviously
isn't
gonna
work
for
people
in
europe
and
you
might
just
be
waking
up
if
you're
in
asia
time
zones
so
feel
free
to
come
in.
But
if
you're
in
the
europe
time
zone
the
one
septimus
is
leading
tomorrow,
I
think
it's.
What
time
is
its
optimus
for
europe.
A
2Pm,
a
fireside
chat
to
discuss
more
about
these
parameters,
answer
questions
and
and
come
with
questions
come
with
things
to
talk
about
and
and
there'll
be
more
open
space
and
then
our
final,
our
we'll
try
to
do
one
more
fireside
chat
in
both
of
those
time
zones
that
are
friendly
for
both
of
those
time
zones
and
we'll
also
have
the
final
debate
on
wednesday
so
make
sure
to
rock
the
vote.
A
There's
three
votes
out
there,
but
for
sure
hit
the
runoff
one
and
the
other
two
are
also
pretty
interesting
but
they're
more
about
the
details.
So
thank
you.
Everyone
for
coming
sorry
for
going
seven
minutes
over
a
lot
to
talk
about,
and
we
will.
Hopefully
it
was
entertaining-
and
educational
and
I'll
see
you
in
the
next
ones.