►
From YouTube: A mix-a-lot of raise-a-lot
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
I
feel
like
we
pretty
much
covered
it,
I'm
I'm
happy
to
the
last
10
minutes,
but
since
my
original
one
was
a
fork
of
nugget,
so
I
like
this
one,
a
lot
that
raise
a
lot,
which
was
the
original
nuggets,
raise
a
lot,
so
I
forked
that
one
and
probably
I'm
the
only
one
who
voted
for
it
so
far
and
now
I
won't
vote
for
it
anymore.
Actually.
Now
I
want
to
take
my
votes
back
and
vote
for
my
better
version.
B
You
can
close
it
and
you
can
get
your
votes.
Okay,
that's
right!
I
will
do
that.
I
will
do
that
and
I
really
liked
a
lot
of
what
he
did
here.
But
of
course
I
did
want
to
drop
the
min
raise
to
match
what
we
have
in
these
and
soft
commitments,
and
then
I
sort
of
kept
tweaking
these
outputs
so
that
I
could
find
something
that
felt
here
like
it
was
right
and
it
felt
like
you
know.
B
Well,
I
guess
let
me
go
through,
so
the
minimum
goal
was
basically
that
soft
commits
the
target
goal
was
pretty
modest.
Still
it.
A
Was
one
million
and
then
the
maximum
goal?
I
thought:
okay,
let's
keep
nuggets,
you
know,
15
mil
seems
unrealistic,
but
also,
why
not?
Why
lower
it?
I
didn't
see
any
real
reason
to
make
it
lower.
So
I
left
it
with
a
80
hour
impact
rate
for
the
target.
So
if
we
raise
a
million,
then
it's
80
80
die
an
hour.
A
Actually,
but
also
you
know
not
what
we
could
be
sure
about
being
some
sort
of
fair.
A
B
Yeah,
21
million-
that's
a
genius
idea,
actually
cool
I'll.
Maybe
I
can
maybe
I
can
make
that
work.
The
hatch
tribute
is,
you
know,
I
don't
know
it
feels
fair.
You
know
like
it's,
not
super
high,
you
know
you
can
exit
and
there's
just
by
you
participating
in
this.
Your
exit
regenerates
this
economy.
A
Right
so
you're
like
you're
you're,
you're
you're,
giving
back
you
know
it's
not
lost
money,
it's
money
that
goes
back
into
token
engineering
product
projects,
so
it
feels
fair,
so
chewy
adds
a
little
bit
less
than
what
you
were
hoping
for,
but
I
could
be
convinced
to
move
it
to
eight
too.
I
I
vote
for
that.
One
as
well.
B
And
then
I
like
to
I
liked
your
argument
nugget
around
this.
You
know:
okay,
if
you're
in
you
know,
if
you're
in
the
trusted
seat
come
all
in
you
know,
but
now
I
feel
a
little
bit
different
now.
I
feel
like
I
really
liked
the
the
presentation
of
having
it
having
it
be
a
little
bit.
Where
is
my
where
these
numbers
be
yeah,
maybe
yeah,
I
don't.
A
A
Seed,
so
if
you
just
joined-
and
this
is
your
c-stack
score-
maybe
this
is
maybe
this
is
two,
I'm
not
sure.
B
B
A
Nice
about
you
know
this
is
the
moment
the
moment
will
pass.
If
you
don't
take
this
moment
versus
sort
of
dragging
it
out,
I
thought
any
longer
than
four
weeks
felt
and
yeah.
It
loses
a
little
bit
of
that
of
that
energy.
To
to
you
know,
I
don't
hate
to
say
fomo
but
fomo
like
there's
less
fomo
the
longer
it
takes.
A
B
A
B
The
very
bottom,
and
then
for
the
dow
configuration
I'm
pretty
convinced
now
that
it
should
be
higher
support.
A
Required
and
the
quorum,
maybe
maybe
would
I
would
keep
it
at
10.
A
I'm
also
pretty
convinced
now
of
a
shorter
proposal
buffer,
but
I
do
like
the
high
toll
gate
fee.
I
I
didn't
change
that
from
nuggets,
because
I
thought
it
made
sense
to
me
just
to
prevent
like
I
having
having
no
like
knowing
that
a
person
could
then
request
it
back.
A
It
seems
like
there's
there's
a
recourse
for
somebody
that
shouldn't
have
lost,
I
mean
should
should
recoup
that
cost
for
the
proposal,
but
it's
a
huge
deterrent
for
anyone
to
to
propose
fake
proposals
or
waste
the
time
of
the
people
in
the
down
waste.
The
time
of
the
community.