►
From YouTube: Param debates: Beta testing the Dashboard
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
C
That's
the
name
of
this
proposal,
and
it's
basically,
I
arranged
it
basic
based
on
my
common
sense
logic,
not
an
unnecessarily
economic
sense,
and
I
chose
the
price
for
one
diet
in
price,
because
I
feel
it's
easy
to
immediately
get
a
grip
on
like
if,
if
you
sell
something
for
or
you
put
a
price
or
something
to
one
dollar,
but
if
you
put
it
to
99
people
just
like
one
dollar,
because
it
sounds
better
for
some
reason:
marketing,
wise
and
then
the
token
freeze
and
the
token
saw
I
put
it
26
and
52
52
being
the
double
of
26..
C
I
felt
that
it
was
proportionate
into
the
freeze
amount
of
time
common
tribute,
I'm
based
on
the
original
numbers
that
were
placed
here,
and
I
felt
that
50
I
think
was
here-
was
a
little
bit
too
much.
So
I
narrowed
it
to
30.
A
C
Never
mind,
then:
where
should
I
stay
here
or
should
I
go
back
to
now.
C
C
I
felt
that,
based
on
the
previous
votations
that
we
have
had
88
is
too
much,
so
I
felt
that
around
number
85
it's
better
and
then
minimum
quarrel,
seven
percent,
because
it's
a
lucky
number,
both
durations
it's
seven
days,
delegating
voting
six
quite
ending
period,
zero.
Quite
in
the
extension,
zero
and
execution
delayed
two
days,
because
I
felt
that
one
day
was
a
little
bit
too
short
for
execution
delay
and
then
spending
limit.
C
So
I
put
five
percent
because
then
again
I
felt
that
it
should
be
proportionate
and
minimum
conviction.
Two
percent.
The
idea
of
this
one
was
to
have
a
an
amount
that
it's
I
I
put
it
in
the
description
I
kind
of.
I
cannot
exactly
remember
the
exact
names
that
I
used,
but
it
was
like.
Oh
smart
spending,
a
high
participation
in
order
to
have
a
balance.
C
A
A
Where
one
more
the
conviction
voting
table
at
the
at
the
bottom.
A
A
B
D
B
B
A
B
C
A
Well,
I
will
say
that
your
your
app
is
still
is
actually
broken,
so
you
need
to
clear
the
local
storage,
because
I
couldn't
really
see
the
data
I
would
need
to
see
to
actually
play
if
it
was
good
or
not
all
right
cool.
A
A
The
back
or
all
the
way
down
and
return
the
configuration.
Oh
wow,
you
have
like
an
older
version
or
something.
D
Right,
oh,
you
don't
have
the
correction.
D
B
A
B
E
Screen
all
right,
so
I
guess
I
can
go
to
the
quick
config
here
just
to
explain
things
so
I
set
an
opening
price
of
145
with
pretty
long
token
freezes
and
thaws
20
20-week
freeze
and
an
80-week
thaw.
E
So
my
my
justification,
for
that
was
with
the
hatch
ratio
being
1-1
for
the
hatch,
the
opening
price
should
be
marginally
higher
should
still
allow
new
entrants
at
a
reasonable
price
point.
Relatively
short,
I
guess
torque
token
freeze
period
compared
to
the
originals
and
a
long
total
freeze
for
around
two
years.
So
it
should
give
the
tec
plenty
of
time
to
start
moving
along
and
getting
proposals
passed
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
so
really
a
proposal
to
allow
a
decent
entry
point
higher
than
the
hatch
and
yeah
enough
time
to
get
going,
basically.
E
So
for
the
bonding
curve.
Here
I
have
a
commons
tribute
of
60
percent,
so
I'm
really
making
sure
that
we
have
a
good
pool
of
funds
for
actionable
proposals,
entry,
tribute
of
eight
percent
and
an
exit
tribute
of
12.,
so
generally
a
20-ish
percent
total.
So
we
want.
We
want
funds
to
be
allocated
to
the
funding
pool.
E
That's
my
simple
justification:
we
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
an
amount
here
that
is
going
to
pass
proposals
and
make
things
happen,
so
they,
while
the
percentages
may
seem
highest,
some
participants
should
be.
E
Supportive
of
the
tec
mission
and
eight
percent
should
be
reasonably
reasonable
to
have
to
folks
that
are
aligned
with
the
mission.
The
exit
tribute
is
higher
for
the
same
reason,
so
kind
of
similar
justification
there
and
then
for
the
tao
voting
settings.
E
I
put
a
slight
super
majority,
so
sixty
percent
with
a
minimum
quorum
of
five
percent
vote
duration
of
five
days,
a
delegated
voting
period
of
four
days,
a
quiet,
ending
period
of
two
and
an
extension
of
one
with
an
execution
delay
of
two
days.
I
also
kind
of
thought
one
day
is
a
little
bit
short,
so
my
strategy
here,
a
super,
a
small
super
majority
for
required
support,
I'm
unsure
if
quorum,
should
be
lower,
not
to
ensure
proposals
can
pass,
but
the
tcu
so
far
has
been
very
engaged.
E
So
I
think
five
percent
is
reasonable
and
achievable.
I
lowered
the
vote
periods
for
responsiveness
so
that
the
we
can
make
sure
if
there's
something
that
we
want
to
pass
quickly.
We
can
and
given
that
x,
extensions
are
possible.
So
if
it's
a
contentious
vote
there
can
be
extensions.
I
made
sure
that
there
were
quiet
periods
here.
So
then,
the
two
two
day
delay
to
ensure
the
tc
has
time
to
audit
proposal
execution
and
we
don't
end
up
with
a
comp
style
issue,
my
conviction,
voting
settings.
E
I
put
a
spending
limit
of
12
percent
minimum
conviction
of
0.5
and
seven
days
so
pretty
close
to
the
default
settings.
I
said
no
proposal
should
be
able
to
claim
a
massive
amount,
so
it's
just
over
10
12,
I
think,
is
reasonable
and
I
relatively
simple
conviction.
Voting
parameters
didn't
didn't
see
a
huge
need
for
a
change,
a
need
for
a
huge
change
there.
So
and
my
submission
title
is
pretty
simple
support
the
tec
funds
for
proposals
and
disincentivizing
speculators.
B
B
Or,
or
funding
or
common
arm
poor
with
the
entry
and
exit
tribute
like?
What's
the
like.
C
I,
like
your
conservative
approach
and
the
logic
of
funding
for
proposals.
I
didn't
thought
about
it,
but
I
think
yeah.
It's
I
like
the
optimistic
approach
while
being
conservative
about
it.
A
If
you
go
back
to
the
bonding-
oh
yes,
yes,
actually.
A
Oh
no.
It's
changing.
F
A
A
D
I
I
wanna
yeah
share
some
of
my
thoughts.
Two
okay
yeah.
B
Yeah
I
choose
like
a
very
conservative
opening
price
like
80
percent
for
the
hatchets
and
actually
very
token,
freeze
and
tokens
out
like
because
on
this
strategy
I
really
want
to
focus
on
incentivizing
speculators,
but
we
don't
want
the
hatches
to
be
the
speculators.
We
want
the
people
from
outside
or
hatches
could
speculate,
but
with
a
new
money,
not
the
one
like
it's
yeah,
begging
our
systems
and
yeah,
just
not
to
block
the
economy
that
that's
why
I
yeah
it
was
very
restrictive.
B
With
the
token
prison
token
saw,
and
a
modest
er
opening
price.
So
that
intention
is
to
run
this
con
for
a
long
time.
So
yeah,
that's
the
biggest
notation
on
those
yeah,
and
then
I
wanted
to
be
a
very
bigger
common.
Tribute
like
I
was
feeling
like
40
was
I
I
I
that's
where
I'm
not
so
sure,
because,
but
I
also
wanted
to
have
a
high
reserve
ratio
yeah.
I
want
yeah.
B
In
the
like,
I
don't
try
not
fully
understand
like
the
whole
system,
but
I
feel
like
it's
very
important
to
have
like
both
present
touch
with
a
pretty
safe
yeah,
just
not
to
the
economy
to
be
sustainable
but
yeah.
I
I.
B
39
24.
B
Thanks
and
and
yeah
and
then
the
entry
tribute
and
the
exit
tribute
are
low
because
yeah
the
intention
is,
like
people
feel
free
to
speculate
with
the
token
and
even
if
it's
low,
but
then,
if
the
there
is
a
lot
of
transactions,
it
will
and
actually
it's
not
a
lot
to
you,
like
one
percent,
every
time,
you're
doing
a
trade
and
2.5.
I
feel
you
know
it's
still
a
it's
a
good
amount
and
if
we
have
a
high
volume
of
trading
it
will
help
us
and
then
yeah
for
the
top
voting.
B
I
I
really
went
from
the
hatch,
perhaps
party
hatch
params
we
have
I
yeah,
I
mean
we
are
using
them
not
that
much,
but
I
feel
like
they're.
You
know
when
we
need
to
pass
something
quick,
it's
possible.
Even
with
the
commons
it's
going
to
be
a
bit
harder
than
it's
in
the
hatch,
because
more
tokens
are
going
to
be
there
and
yeah
not
like
the
worlds
are
going
to
lose
some
weight.
But
that's:
okay,
that's
cool
and
I
feel
yeah.
I
really
feel
comfortable
with
those
and
yeah.
I
feel
keep
going.
B
B
For
something
like
you
know,
if
something
we
need
to
dispute,
we
can
do
it
and
then
yeah
on
the
spend,
spend
limit
and
conviction
rule
yeah.
I
was
keep
also
keeping
on
the
strategy
of
making
like,
for
example,
like
the
intention
is
like
maybe
someone
for
their
project.
Maybe
they
need,
like.
B
I
don't
know,
eight
percent
of
this,
of
the
common
pool,
let's
say
but
it's
okay
like
they
could
just
ask
twice,
and
then
we
enforce
accountability
when
asking
funds
like
if
you
give
all
the
funds
in
once,
I
feel
like
that
confidential
so
make
I
don't
like
making
proposals
like
very
often,
maybe
my
feel.
B
It
helps
to
bring
accountability
to
the
dow
so
and
honestly,
I
feel
like
making
proposal.
You
know
when
you're
asking
for
money.
It's
not
like
this
big
of
a
deal
like
just
it's
like
compared
to
the
real
work.
It's
not
that
much
and
you
give
a
control
to
the
community
and
what
is
for
me
more
important
and
oh.
B
A
B
F
Oh,
oh,
I
can
comment
on
anything,
but
I
was
gonna
comment
on
the
I
really
like
quiet,
ending
extension.
I
think
it's
a
really
useful
thing
because
it's
like,
if
somebody
really
wanted
a
vote,
to
go
one
way
and
had
like
a
beefy
amount
of
tokens.
They
just
could
just
wait
till
the
very
last.
Second
then,
like
vote
flip
the
vote
and
then
it
goes
through
and
then
you're
like
that's
too
bad
and,
like.
F
I
think
the
dow
voting
parameters
are
like
really
important
because
they
change
they
can
change
the
parameters
of
the
comments
they
change
like
fundamental
things
about
the
tao,
so
I
think
it
would
be
like
it's.
Maybe
these
votes
take
a
little
longer
if
we're
adding
like
extensions
and
extensions
and
extensions.
But
ultimately
I
think
it's
like
better
to
be
safe
than
sorry
when
we're
talking
about
like
changing
things
that
affect
the
entire
commons
yeah.
A
B
A
E
Oh
sorry,
go
ahead,
oh
god
I
was
just
gonna,
say
yeah.
I
also
am
a
little
bit
supportive
of
having
the
quiet
period.
E
I
mean
for
the
reasons
that
that
lauren
mentioned,
but
also
from
the
communication
side,
not
everybody
hears
about
the
vote
at
the
same
time
so
like
if
there's
someone
who
maybe
has
a
strong
opinion
and
didn't
hear
about
it
until
halfway
through
the
boat
period,
for
example,
or
maybe
a
day
or
two
into
it,
and
they
have
to
review
everything
and
they
want
to
vote
against
it.
E
A
B
A
F
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
cool.
I
I
think
it's.
I
always
put
the
exit
tribute
higher,
because
I
want
people
to
come
in
and
get
stuck,
but
I
think
it's
really
cool
to
like
encourage
the
speculators.
It's
just
like
increasing,
burning
and
minting
and
then
like
more
funds
more
frequently
going
to
the
pools.
I
think
that
this
is
an
interesting
and
these
are
interesting
parameters
and
when
people
put
different
things
like
you,
I
wouldn't
have
picked
one
percent
and
2.5.
D
Yeah
and
on
this
regard,
I
think
like,
if
you
had
a
really
small
entry
tribute,
you
might
maybe
even
add
a
pressure
to
like
speculators
get
in
and
while
they're
in
like
they,
they
hope
to
the
the
price
goes
up
because
the
exit
tribute
is
like
higher
and
then
they
they
can.
Did
this
like
risk
expecting
to
go
up.
So
I
think,
might
have
a
like
more
optimistic
effect
in
the
speculators.
Behavior.
D
That
just
the
conviction,
growth
like
it's
three
days
right,
just
that
maybe
like
maybe
like
it-
takes
too
little
to
have
like
your
food
convictions
and
proposals
and
people
might
like
change
it
too
fast
between
them.
Can
you
repeat
that,
like
your
conviction
grows
like
three
days
right.
B
D
B
B
D
D
Change
the
proportion
and,
if
it's
like
higher
then
like
say,
like
you,
know
two
weeks
for
example,
then
I'll
I'll
end
up
having
more
value
for
staying
there
more
time.
D
And
I
I
don't
know
yeah,
I
think
like
it
would
be
good
to
start
with
a
high
opening
price
like
three.
Why?
D
Because
I
feel
that
otherwise
it
would
be
really
easy
to
like
yeah,
I
don't
know,
buy
a
lot
of
governance
just
by
adding
funds,
and
I
think
that
if
we
start
with
a
high
opening
price,
maybe
we
can
take
care
more
of
of
the
governance
that
was
very
well
distributed
and
worked
before
the
the
the
yeah,
the
commons
upgrade
and
with
the
the
distribution
that
we
did
for
the
hatch
and
yeah
a
token
freeze
of
27
weeks,
tokens
of
105
weeks
and
yeah.
D
Most
of
these
numbers
are
like
multipliers
of
three.
I
don't
know.
I
I
like
to
use
like
just
one
constant
in
the
choosing
of
the
parameters.
A
D
Oh
yeah
yeah
that
that
would
have
been
15,
15,
okay,
cool
yeah,
15
and
yeah.
On
the
on
the
disputable
voting,
I
didn't
change
much.
D
I
just
made
the
numbers
like
match
of
two
multipliers
of
three
from
the
in
from
the
initial
parameters
from
the
from
the
ones
that
are
shown
in
the
in
the
dashboard
and
and
yeah
in
the
conviction,
growth.
I
chose
six
days
with
a
spending
limit
of
24
and
a
minimum
conviction
of
0.6.
A
Nice
any
comments
I
I
I'll
start
with,
like
I
saw
that
you
put
three
hours
in
there
for
the
execution
delay
any.
How
come
you
did
that?
What
were
your
thoughts
there.
D
A
D
Yeah
but
my
most
polemic
and
proposal
is
to
have
a
high
initial
opening
price.
D
D
Yeah,
I
think
it
might
be
tentative,
but
that
way
we
can
be
completely
sure
of
who
thinks
that
having
governance
in
the
organization
is
more
valuable
than
changing
and
having
money
for
for
some
time.
Yeah.
A
I
can't
wait
to
see
this
version
in
the
actual
application
like
and
see
see
what
it
looks
like.
A
So
I
I'm
especially,
I
think
the
reserve
ratio
with
the
initial
buy
will
be
much
lower,
and
so
I
don't
think
three
will.
Quite
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
little
too
high,
because
there'll
be
like
some
major
slippage
on
it'll,
just
be
like
a
really
poorly
funded
bonding
curve,
but
we'll
see
we'll
see
how
you
do
with
the
comments
tribute.
Maybe
that
can
be
adjusted
and
it
can
work
out,
but
because,
right
now,
in
this
version
it
doesn't
have.
It
has
300
extra
thousand
dollars.
Basically,
okay,
okay,.
D
A
Cool
yeah
does
anyone
else,
have
any
comments
on
wonka's
or
do
they
want
to
present
their
frams
lauren?
You
look
like
you
want
to
present
your
prams.
F
No,
I
don't
have
any
brands
to
present.
I
was
just
like
messing
with
bugs,
but
I
would
love
to
just
like
everybody
picked
a
really
different
spending
limit.
Like
I
think,
wonka
was
like
around
thirty
percent
safety
had
like
six
percent
chris
had
like
twelve
percent,
and
I
would
love
if
we
could
just
like
talk
about
why
you
picked
these
spending
limits
or
like
different
perspectives
of
it,
because
I'm
like
love
to.
E
Because
mine
is
inspired
by
a
previous
project
that
is
very
similar,
so
I
can
post
some
links,
but
the
proof
of
weak
hands.
3D
was
one
of
the
initial
early
bonding
curve
projects
and
it
had
attacks
on,
buys
and
sells
of
10.
E
So
and
I
just
checked
the
contract,
and
it
still
has
three
that
over
three
thousand
ether
still
sitting
in
the
contract
so
enough
people
with
enough
ether
or
maybe
some
of
those
people
lost
their
keys.
True
too,
but
like
enough
either
it
at
its
at
its
peak.
It
had
81
000
ether
in
it
at
a
10,
buy
and
sell
tax.
So
I
don't
think
it's
unreasonable
even
for
speculators
to
jump
in
at
a
tax
of
10.
E
E
A
So
what
I'm
hearing
is
we
need
to
like
ponzi,
this
baby
and,
like
really
say
proof
of
token
engineering,
proof
of
weak
token
engineers.
You
know
like
how
strong
are
your
hands
token
engineers
get
in
here,
fomo
in
the
marketing
cultural
build?
A
F
A
So
I
definitely
like
this
idea
of
a
low
spending
limit,
mostly
because
I
really
like
this
curvature
and
I'm
trying
to
play
with
the
params
to
get
a
good
curvature.
You
know
because,
like
otherwise
requesting
you
know
ten
dollars
well,
let's
see
like
it's
like
here's.
A
requesting
a
thousand
dollars
will
will
require.
A
A
It's
like
the
difference
is
almost
negligible
because,
okay,
so
this
chart,
it
shows
like
how
many
tokens
exist,
are
all
the
same
for
every
scenario
right,
but
in
in
odd
scenarios
the
common
pool
only
has
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
in
even
scenarios
the
common
pool
has
700.
It
has
three
quarters
of
a
million
dollars
in
it
right
and
then
in
scenarios,
one
and
two:
it's
requesting
a
thousand
dollars
scenarios.
Three
and
four:
it's
asking
for
five
thousand
scenarios.
A
A
This
one
is
like
on
the
extreme
you
can
see
like
when
you're
asking
for
this
is
asking
for
25
percent
of
the
column
pool
it
actually
shouldn't.
Even
I
think
this
is
broken.
A
This
shouldn't
even
be
possible,
but
either
way
it's
like
this
is
the
only
one
when
you're
asking
for
25
of
the
pool
like
if
you
look
at
this
chart
like
it's
basically
flat,
whether
you're
asking
for
one
dollar
or
five
percent
of
the
common
pool.
It's
like
it's
not
even
off
the
green
line.
You
know
the
difference
in
in
tokens
is
almost
nothing
so
the
two
ways
to
adjust
that
are
lowering
the
spending
limit.
A
That
kind
of
like
makes
it
a
little
bit
harder
make
some
more
variety,
although
I
think
this
is
broken
right
now,
but
still
it
adds
it
adds.
You
know
it
makes
some
curvature
and
gives
some
variety
there,
but
what
really
changes
it
is.
This
minimum
conviction
like
it
really
like
gives
it
more
con,
makes
it
harder
to
pass
small
proposals,
but
also
makes
the
variableness
strong
and
then
like
spending
limit.
A
F
B
I
was
also
going
to
say,
like
also
like
the
small
spending
limit,
because,
even
if,
when
you
need
to
request
for
a
bigger
amount
of
funds,
you
can
ask
twice
and
the
second
time
you
are
asking
for
them.
You
have
to
show
the
community
the
results
with
the
first
one,
so
that
helps
to
keep
the
community
accountable
yeah.
That
was
my
main
reason
behind
a
low
spending
limit.
F
Makes
sense
it's
interesting
and-
and
it's
interesting
like
bumping
up
also
like
the
minimum
conviction
to
like
five
percent,
so
I've
always
felt
like.
Oh,
it
should
be
super
low
because,
like
really
small
proposals
should
have
the
ability
to
last
but
yeah
five
percent,
it
looks
yeah.
It
looks
it's
nicer
that,
like
larger
proposals,
actually
need
like
more
participation
and
then
you
want
to
have
like
a
more
gradual
curve.
So
I
think
it's
like
cool
justifications.
B
A
One
thing
I
wanna
one
I'm
thinking
about
is
the
entry
and
exit
tributes
and
whether
or
not
so
like.
How
are
people
really
going
to
use
this
economy?
Will?
Will
people
actually
use
our
bonding
curve
to
buy
and
sell
tokens,
or
will
they
just
go?
Buy
it
on
honey?
Swap
now
I
think,
with
with
septimus's
proposal,
you
probably
you
could
just
go
to
the
bonding
curve
and
it's
more
fun.
A
You
know,
you're,
never
gonna,
see
slippage
issues
and
because
well
I
mean
you'll
see
a
little
bit,
but
whatever
is
naturally
there
and
then
also
you.
You
know
that
you're
funding
public
goods,
while
you're
like
interacting
there's
like
warm
fuzzy
feelings
and
the
fee,
is
small,
but
if
you
have
like
a
10
spread,
but
with
the
entry
entry
exit
entry
plus
exit
tribute
or
more,
then
people
aren't
going
to
use
the
bonding
curve
they're
going
to
go
to
the
market,
and
so
now
the
question
is
okay.
So
how?
A
When
the
market's
fluctuating
up,
you
know,
when
do
we
want
the
arbitrage
bots,
basically
to
start
tribute,
start
triggering
the
the
bonding
curve
to
mint
and
sell
burn
tokens
to
so
they
can
do
arbitrage
on
the
free
market,
and
I'm
wondering
under
that
scenario
like,
should
we
have
the
entry
tribute
higher
so
that
the
market
price
is
higher
than
it
is
on
the
bonding
curve?
A
Then
sorry,
if
the
entry
tribute
is
higher
than
the
exit
tribute,
then
most
of
the
time
the
market
price
will
be
higher
than
the
bonding
curve
price.
And
I'm
wondering
if
there's
like
a
psychological
thing
there
of
like.
Oh,
the
market
likes
it
more
than
you
know
the
bonding
curve
price
and
like
just
seeing
the
price
on
the
market
higher
than
what
it
is
on
the
bonding
curve,
if
that
would
be
like
more
psychologically
healthy
for
our
community.
Basically,.
B
B
F
B
Humans
affects
like
if
the
interest
rate
is
lower.
A
And
also
the
entry
tribute
is:
what's
going
to
be
used
a
lot
at
the
beginning.
You
know
not
the
exit
tribute.
So
maybe
if
we
had
the
entry
tribute
kind
of
high
we'd
end
up
with
extra
more
funds
early
on
in
the
common
pool,
more
people
will
be
buying
than
selling
early
on
it's
only
when
it
only
equalizes
when
the
hatcheries
can
sell
their
tokens
and
then.
A
Anyway,
okay,
well,
I'm
gonna
call
it
guys.
Thank
you
so
much
for
helping
us
beta
test
this
software
and
it
was
fun
matt.
Did
you
have
any
comments?
I
mean
threw
you
into
the
deep
end
here:
yeah,
I'm
just
here
getting
firehose.
No,
I
thought
it
was
really
cool.
I
read
I
got
through
like
half
of
the
the
how-to's
they're
like
really
well
written,
so
I
understand
half
of
what's
going
on
up
from
zero
but
yeah.
I
thought
it
was
like
really
interesting
how
different
the
models
were
like
some
are
really
conservative.
A
Some
are
really
liberal
and,
like
I
was
thinking
about
like
you
know,
the
how-to
was
like
oh
set
the
exit
strategy
higher
or
higher
than
the
entrance,
and
then
you
start
to
see
them
like
get
closer
together.
It
encourages
speculation
and
like,
but
if
inevitably,
someone's
gonna
take
this
and
like
flip
it
or
do
some
weird
stuff
with
it
that,
like
you
guys
haven't
intended
like,
I
was
just
kind
of
curious
what
those
models
look
like,
because
someone's
this
you
know
what
I
mean
totally.
A
A
A
D
D
A
Yeah
yeah
we're
going
to
use
token
lock
again
like
we
did
for
the
hatch
and
then
I
think
we'll
use
snapshot
for
the
runoff.
So
when
we
have
the
last
three
to
five
parameters,
then
we'll
actually
put
it
all
on
snapshot,
because
it's
a
little
more
accessible
for
people
for
like
the
larger
community,
but
but
yeah
we
will.
We
will
start
voting,
probably
in
the
next
well.
A
The
vote
happens
at
the
same
time
as
submitting
it
so
yeah,
we'll,
actually
you'll
actually
be
able
to
vote
right
away,
but
so
that'll
start
next
week
we'll
actually
be
submitting
the
real
parameters,
because
this
still
is
buggy,
as
you
can
see,
there's
still
some
bugs.
So
it's
not
ready
for.
Like
the
your
final
parameter
station
and
pedro,
did
you
have
any
comments
or
anything
you
want
to
say
before
we
close
it
out.
D
A
Awesome
cool
well,
thank
you
all
for
hanging
out
and
I'll
see.
You
see
you
on
sunday.
If
you
want
to
come
to
the
hack
session,
we'll
do
another
one
of
these
it'll
be
around
the
same
time
on
sunday.
So
see
you
guys.
Thank
you
guys.