►
From YouTube: Hatch Param Voting DEBATE! Hosted By Griff
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
I'll
model
it
I
only
have
olivia
chewie
or
I
have
livia
tam
and
maybe
chewie
and
zep.
If
someone
else
wants
to
present
tell
me
as
soon
as
you
can
please
interrupt
because
or
find
a
spot,
because
otherwise
I
will
give
up
your
time
to
these
other
your
you
will
lose
your
time.
A
So
I'm
going
to
give
myself
I'm
going
to
start
to
model
and
I'm
going
to
give
myself
three
minutes
to
pitch
just
in
case
someone
else
wants
to
start
and
and
then
three
minutes
of
questions,
so
you
can
actually
close
that
one.
So
I
want
to
present
goldilocks
v4
right
now.
Goldilocks
b4
actually
changed
the
emojis.
It
was
a
frog
emoji,
but
then
zep's
like
we
don't
want
to
vote
for
the
frog.
A
You're
right,
we
shouldn't
vote
for
the
frog,
so
it's
up
here
with
the
peace
sign
vote
for
vote
for
me.
Vote
for
me
vote
for
peace.
A
vote
for
this
is
a
vote
for
peace
and
it's
a
really
cool
proposal.
I
it
really
is
a
it's
a
fork
of
goldilocks
in
concept,
but
I
did
change
a
lot
of
parameters.
A
The
main
goal
was
to
or
one
of
the
one
of
the
key
goals
that
I
wanted
to
put
was
a
digestible
pull
supply
for
builders.
So
goldilocks
has
this
like
even
impact
hour
rate,
but
I
don't
really
want
to
focus
on
the
price
of
one
impact
hour.
I
really
just
want
to
focus
on
the
more
macro
level
of
like
an
even
amount
for
the
builders
for
the
people
who
put
this
in.
So
if
we
raise
the
min
amount
of
800k
builders
get
25
percent
of
the
tokens.
A
If
we
hit
the
target
goal
of
3
million
builders
get
20
of
the
tokens.
If
we
hit
our
max
goal
of
14
million,
then
builders
get
10
of
token
supply
and
the
backers
people
put
money
in
they
get
90
of
the
tokens.
That
creates
a
nice
incentive,
selling
point
easy
numbers.
People
can
remember
it
feels
it
just
feels
right.
It
feels
good
man
feels
good
man,
so
other
other
dynamics
that
I
think
are
important
to
mention
this.
I
I
like
a
low
hatch
tribute
and
don't
get
me
wrong.
A
I,
like
this
middle
of
the
road
and
I'd,
be
very
hap.
I'd
be
fine
with
an
eight
percent
attribute,
but
I
really
love
this
idea
of
making
sure
that
the
rage
quit
percent
is
high,
so
the
people
feel
like
safe
participating
if
we
can
have,
and
the
hash
tribute
directly
takes
that
away.
A
So
I
went
with
a
two
percent
enhanced
tribute
so
that
anyone
who's
putting
money
in
they
kind
of
get
that
money
back
guarantee
right
like
okay,
I'm
going
to
try
this,
but
if
I
need
this
liquidity
for
some
reason,
I
can
pull
73
percent
out
most
of
the
people
who
don't
use
the
guarantee
on
the
box.
I
don't
think
there'll
be
much
rage
quitting,
but
I
do
like
this
concept
that
oh,
I
as
an
individual
can
hold
the
collective
accountable
on
the
dow.
I
went
with
eight
percent
quorum
and
88
support
required.
A
I
don't
think
that
we
should
pass
a
proposal
if
12,
unless,
if,
if
like
15
percent
of
people,
vote
and
engage
and
say
no,
I
don't
think
it
should
pass
like
that's
why
I
went
with
a
high
support
required
and
eight
percent
minimum
quorum,
because
I
think
there
will
be
enough
whales
and
we
can
figure
out
who
the
whales
are
and
we
can
pass
technical
issues
and
proposals
if
we
need
to
and
eight
percent
is
a
nice
sweet
spot.
This
beautiful
number
and
48
hour
rage
quit
and
my
time
is
up.
A
Anyone
anyone
have
a
suggestion
of
how
I
could
or
yeah.
A
Because
I
would
I,
I
think
the
hatch
tribute
is
directly
opposed
to
a
high
rage,
quit
percent
and
historically,
in
my
opinion,
people
haven't
rage
quit,
but
having
the
rage,
quit
really
encourages
people
to
participate
and
join
and
makes
it
feel
safe
right
as
an
individual.
I
can
choose
to
put
money
in
and
at
two
percent
going
over
here,
it's
like
two
percent
fee.
I
don't
even
think
about
that
right.
A
So
two
percent
is
like
in
that
negligible
range,
but
the
most
important
thing
is
like:
if
I
put
my
money
in
here,
can
I
get
it
out
and
and
so
I
think
that
it'll
help
us
raise
more
money
to
have
a
high
range
quit
percent
and
I
would
like
to
raise
more
money
so.
E
I
like
that
argument,
but
I've
been
looking
at
their
rage
quit
as
part
of
what
makes
the
economy
regenerative.
Is
that
a
false
way
of
looking
at
it?.
A
No,
I
mean
it
all
depends
on
how
it
plays
out,
and
we
don't
know
the
future
right
so
yeah
if
people
rage
quit
and
pull
money
out.
The
way
I
see
it
is,
then
we
have
less
collateral
to
play
with
in
the
bonding
curve
and
the
funding
pool
starting
out,
and
it
would
be
really
nice
to
have
more
money
to
give
away
his
grants
and
when
we
go
so
if
people
rage
quit
cool
but
yeah,
I
kind
of
like
having
our
collective
decision
making
process
held
accountable
to
this
fear.
A
B
So
so
it's
very
abstract
how
the
how
does
non-redeemable
would
play
if
we
don't
even
have
the
upgrade
yet
right,
because,
like
the
this
choice
influences
and
will
we
even
have
a
choice
in
the
future
like
if
we
have
a
ridiculous
high
hatch
tribute
and
people
don't
feel
like
safe
to
participate
like
maybe
that,
wouldn't
that
wouldn't
even
interfere
in
the
in
the
future
of
the
fun?
I
think
that's
still
not
so
clear
for
me
like
what
does
non-redeemable
what
happens
with
it
like.
A
The
non-redeemable
pool
is
collectively
governed,
only
the
redeemable
pool
is
governed
by
both
the
collective
and
the
individual
right.
Individuals
can
rage
quit
it,
the
non-redeemable
pool,
which
is
where
the
hatch
tribute
goes,
cannot
be
taken
out
by
individuals.
So
it's
guaranteed
to
move
forward.
However,
it
has
no
impact
on
what
percentage
we
put
in
the
conviction.
Voting,
funding
pool
or
the
bonding
curve
has
no
impact
there.
It
only
just
says
like
this
is
guaranteed
to
move
forward,
even
if
people
rage
quit.
I
just
you
know
in
my
vision
of
the
future.
A
C
A
Yeah
and
it's
up
to
the
people
who
put
their
money
in
so
like,
I
think,
a
good
argument
for
hatch
tribute
is
that
hey.
We
want
people
who
want
to
put
money
in
the
funding
pool
and
that
if
we,
you
could
even
argue,
if
there's
a
higher
attribute,
then
the
people
who
participate
are
more
organically
aligned
with
the
like.
We
want
to
fund
token
engineering
right,
so
you
might
have
a
higher
funding
pool.
If
you
have
a
higher
hatch
tribute
now,
you
could
make
this
speculation,
but
anything
everything
is
a
guess.
A
This
is
why
we're
politics.
That
being
said
livia,
I
think
it's
your
turn
I'll,
put
four
minutes
on
the
clock.
B
My
turn
to
to
show
my
proposal.
A
Yeah
vote
for
goldilocks
b4.
Okay,
your
turn:
now
you
wanna,
okay,.
E
B
B
E
E
Oh
okay,
so
four
minutes
so,
first
of
all,
I
was
really
greatly
inspired
by
nuggets
and
I
made
a
fork
of
his
and
I
really
liked
the
detailed
analysis
that
he
made
of
his.
It
was
called
raise
a
lot
and
I
did
a
mix
of
rays
a
lot
and
then
he
did
a
new
one
based
on
that
one,
and
now
my
new
one
is
based
on
that
one.
So
it's
sort
of
like
this.
This
escalating
forking
of
each
other's
parameters
and
the
my
reasoning
here
is
tweet
some
things.
E
Let
me
maybe
go
one
by
one,
so
the
target
goal
I
feel
like,
I
probably
have
the
lowest
target
goal
in
a
lot
of
these
programs.
I
chose
one
million
because
I
thought
I
don't
know
it's
just
like
super
realistic,
but
I
like
the
idea
of
a
high
cap,
so
you
know
pie
in
the
sky.
You
know,
there's
there's
really.
I
would
even
raise
the
cap,
you
know
and
go
close
to
infinity
and
a
minimum
goal
is
equal
to
our
soft
commitments.
E
So
I
don't
want
us
not
to
hit
the
minimum
race
and
I'm
being
extra
prudent
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
we
will
continue.
We
will
hatch
the
impact
hour
rate
and
the
rate
at
infinity.
E
I
don't
know
how
to
explain
it
other
than
I
kept
tweaking
the
numbers
until
we
would
end
up
with
the
around
the
target
goal,
which
I
know
is
still
very
modest:
a
pretty
fair,
equal
distribution
between
the
hatchers
and
the
builders,
so
just
about
50
50.,
as
you
can
sort
of
see
by
the
the
pie
charts
with
the
backers,
maybe
having
a
little
more
at
the
target,
but
the
builders
having
more
at
the
the
minimum
goal
and
then
the
membership
ratio.
I
really
struggled
with
this.
E
Actually
I
went
back
and
forth
between.
Do
we
want
do
we
want
to
basically
say
if
you're
in
trusted
seed,
you
can
put
it
in
as
much
as
you
want,
and
I
went
with
some
sort
of
oh.
I
think
I
was
playing
around
to
make
21
million
yeah.
So
I
think
I
went
with
like
one
btc.
E
E
Yeah
did
it
okay,
so
basically
I
want
the
token
supply
to
be
21
million
at
the
target,
and
I
want
the
cap
for
people
who
just
entered
the
trusted
seat
and
have
no
reputation
yet
to
be
one
bitcoin.
So
that's
where
I
got
those
numbers
from
and
the
dow
strategy
was
essentially
to
have
a
higher
quorum,
but
not
so
high.
I
think
there's
enough
dissent
in
our
community
that
if
20
people,
20
percent
say
no,
we
still
do
it
and
that's
okay
to
have
a
community
with
20
dissent.
E
The
quorum
10,
I
think,
is
high
enough
to
ensure
the
integrity
of
the
proposal
without
being
too
high.
That
no
proposal
will
actually
get
through.
I
say
I
think
the
rage
delay
so
the
time
between
the
vote
passing
and
then
the
execution
of
the
proposal
is
pretty
fair,
24
hours.
It
might
be
long,
but
I
think
it
gives
I
mean
48
hours,
but
I
think
it
gives
people
enough
time
to
really
contemplate
the
proposal
that
they
only
have
four
days
to
to
think
about.
Anyway.
E
I
couldn't
make
it
less
than
four
days
I
tried
and
I
kept
deleting
it.
I
hit
three
and
I
deleted
and
I
hit
the
united
deleted.
I
think
four
days
is
a
fair
enough
time
for
to
give
people
time
to
weigh
the
considerations
of
the
of
the
proposal
at
do.
I
have
a
few
seconds
left.
E
Buffer,
I
dropped.
I
had
it
in
a
day,
but
I
was
persuaded
by
the
argument
that
there
can
be
a
use
case
where
there's
a
you
know,
a
patch
that
has
to
be
applied
or
something
that
has
to
be
fixed
or
changed
by
the
dev
team,
and
if
they
need
more
than
one
proposal,
they
shouldn't
have
to
wait
24
hours
between
submitting
more
than
one
proposal
to
do
that
and
the
tollgate
fee.
I
like
it
high.
E
I,
like,
I
think,
septimus's
you
know,
advertising
space
is
super
creative
and
original,
but
I
say
it's
just
a
distraction
and
a
waste
of
people's
time.
So
if
you're
going
to
propose
you're
going
to
have
to
pay
for
it,.
E
Yeah
yeah,
you
showed
me
about
the
impact
hour
distribution
and
I
I
still
feel
like
this.
So
my
my
thinking
is
that,
because
my
target
is
so
modest
it
actually
like.
If
you
see
where
is
the
one
that
has
like
the
higher
the
the
rays,
the
more
disproportionate
it
becomes,
but
I'm
thinking
we'll
raise
more
than
the
target.
Actually,
so
I'm.
B
E
A
little
disingenuous,
I'm
being
a
little
bit
cautious
in
this
proposal.
Thinking
you
know.
If
we
raise
the
target,
I
think
it
would
be
nice
for
the
builders
to
have
you
know
the
modest
target.
I
think
it'd
be
nice
for
the
builders
to
still
have
a
lot
of
governance
over
over
the
hatchdaw,
and
if
we
end
up
with
having
like
lots
of
people
come
in
and
hitting
you
know,
the
the
cstk
whales
and
you
know
invested
or
co-vesting
a
lot
and
people
knew
professing
a
lot.
E
Then
I
think
the
governance
should
shift
a
little
bit
in
favor
of
the
people
who
are
putting
who
have
a
lot
of
who
have
a
lot
of
invested
in
it
right.
So
I
actually
feel
like
it's
a
fair
distribution,
considering
the
numbers
you
know,
I
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
see
what
this
would
look
like
at
with
the
target
of
I
mean:
let's
just
do
that
now
and
I'll.
If
anyone.
A
Because
the
problem
is
when
you
change
the
target
goal,
you
also
have
to
change
the
the
the
target,
the
impact
hours
at
the
target
goal.
Otherwise
it
changes
your
distribution.
A
So
you
have
to
go
down
to
the
you
can
go
down
below
to
the
chart
below
yeah.
At
the
very
end,
it
clicks
some
like
submit
proposal
or
update
research.
The
very
end
yeah
see
results,
and
then
this
chart
it'll
pop
out
what
the
target
rate
is
at
five
mil,
and
if
you
put
that
in
then
then
you'll
get
but
also
I
forked
your
proposal
and
made
went
with
the
target
with
the
in
a
goal,
because
my
real
problem
isn't
the
distribution.
A
I
agree
with
you
about
the
one
mill
or
about
the
like.
Actually
I,
like
your
very
like
steep
curve
and
strong
incentive
structure
to
raise
more
money,
but
with
a
target
goal
of
one
mill
like
on
the
website.
I
feel
like
people
are
gonna,
look
at
that
one
mill
and
then
they're
gonna
be
like
oh,
so
at
one
mil
what
happens,
and
then
we
have
this.
Oh
impact
hours
are
way
too
overly.
You
know.
A
But
other
than
that
other
than
just
a
target
goal
which
doesn't
change
anything
like
like
on
the
math
side,
other
just
this
as
a
social
parameter.
I
think
this
is
a
great
proposal.
E
A
Put
for
the
target
rate
to
keep
your
impact,
our
math,
the
same
for
the
target
rate
put
in
153.85.
A
It's
it's
in
your
it's
in
your
proposal,.
C
E
A
You
have
to
update
your
results.
Good
point:
does
anyone
have
any
quick
questions
for
tam?
We
went
on
a
tangent
there.
A
E
So
I
mean
a
lot
of
things
right,
like
all
of
the
points
of
view
from
from
everyone,
from
all
the
stewards
and
everyone
else
in
the
community,
but
mostly,
I
think
it's
because
I'm
looking
at
a
really
modest
raise.
You
know
at
the
one
mil
so
it
it
look
like
at
that.
It's
sort
of
not
in
there's
not
enough
skin
in
the
game
outside
of
the
builders
to
marry
an
uneven
distribution
right.
E
So
when
it's
5
mil
10
mil
20
mil,
then
it's
sort
of
like
then
that
that
curve
naturally
distributes
a
bigger
part
of
that
pie
to
the
backers.
So
I
optimized
for
one
mil
and
that's
why
I
looked
for
like
if,
if
that's
what
we
raise,
it's
pretty
evenly
distributed
because
yeah.
This
just
feels
like
there's
not
enough
outside.
You
know
outside
meeting
non-builder
capital
inside
to
merit
a
more
a
more
uneven
distribution.
A
Perfect,
I
I
think
we
have
to
you're
you're
a
couple
minutes
over
time,
so
I
have
to
cut
you
off,
but
we
have
chewie.
Do
you
want
to
go.
A
D
I'm
finishing
my
proposal
so
if
if
someone
can
go
before
me,
so
I
can
prepare
better
yeah.
A
F
Oh
sorry,
I
was
muted,
yeah,
sure
yeah
yeah,
let's
go
but.
F
We
can
start
now.
I
actually
apply
like
the
same
technique
that
that
time
and
having
a
minimum
goal
like
quit
or
soft
commit.
So
we
make
sure
like
this
is
going
and
then
like,
but
at
the
same
time
like
at
the
at
the
beginning,
like
the
like,
because
we
want
to
align
the
incentives
of
the
workers
and
also
the
builders
and
at
the
minimum
goal
like
the
the
impact
our
rate
is,
is
low
and
the
and
the
supply
held
by
builders
is
high.
So
everyone
wants
to
raise
more
money.
F
F
It's
100
like
if
people
want
to
troll
us-
and
you
know
they're
funding
us
so
they're,
they
are
giving
funds
to
the
public
t
e
t
goods,
so
yeah,
that's
awesome
and
then
the
support
requirement.
I
put
it
on
80
because.
F
Percent
of
the
community
agrees,
I
feel
like
that's
a
strong,
strong
percentage
and,
and
then
the
minimum
court
might
put
it
on
four
because
of
technical
things
on
the
hatchdaw,
but
I
I
think
that's
you
know
just
for
this
down
on.
Unlike
on
the
on
the
upgrade
of
the
common,
I,
of
course
we
need
a
higher
quorum
and
yeah.
That's
that's
it.
I
I
hope
I
keep
it
short
and
if
someone
has
any
question.
A
I
just
want
to
say
I
really
love
the
the
way
you
played
with
the
the
the
troll
per
hour
so
like
the
buffer,
a
hundred
dollars
per
hour,
and
it's
like
a
way
to
collect
more
money
for
pup
for
people,
because
I
just
I
think
it's
genius
and
funny.
C
Yeah
my
comment:
I
already
did
it
on
the
on
the
pro
on
the
issue
and
I
think
that
four
percent
minimum
quorum
is
a
little
bit
low.
That's
my
only
like
issue.
I
I
say
that,
as
we
are
talking
about
so
much
like
participation,
we
don't
want
it
super
high
that
it
blocks
things
but
not
low
that
it
can
be
like
easily
passed.
So
I
think,
like
eight,
is
a
good
number
for
for
the
quorum.
F
Yeah,
I
can
say
I
agree
on
on
higher
quality,
but
I
put
it
very
low
because
of
if
we
have
you
know,
like
some
tech
issues
or
any
bugs
that
the
community
doesn't
want
to
vote
or
anything,
and
even
if
you
need
like
do
it
very
fast
and
attach
this
issue
very
fast,
you
know
like
you
can
attach
it
and
I
feel,
like
the
alignments
of
the
community
are
like
we
all
want
the
same,
which
is
funding
probably
at
the
public
goods
and
advance
this
field.
F
So
you
know
like
at
the
end
of
the
day
it's
like
a
practical
thing.
It's
not
like,
like
the
common
is
going
to
come
after.
So
it's
just
yeah
practical
thing.
A
A
I'm
joking
okay,
cool!
Well,
I
see
mitch
came
in
santi
came
in.
Do
you
guys
have
a
proposal
that
you
want
to
propose
that
you
want
to
put
up
for
debate.
A
A
Looks
like
santi
might
just
be
listening
as
well
too
bad
because
he
his
proposal
was
pretty
fun.
I
it's,
I
believe,
summoning
the
no
summoning
in
the
technocracy
is
yggs
fork
and
santi
did
technocracy
for
the
win
worth
checking
out.
Technocracy
has
something
to
play
something
to
give
okay.
So
then,
now
it's
olivia
and
chewie.
Who
wants
to
go.
B
I
can
go,
I
can
show
from
the
from
the
dashboard
still
and
then
I'll
submit
very
soon.
B
B
I
I
put
six
hundred
thousand
before,
but
then
I
thought,
like
people
are
gonna,
look
and
they're
gonna.
Think
we're
like,
I
feel
like
we
deserve
more
than
this
like
from
a
cheering
perspective
and
and
the
maximum
goal
is
21
million,
because
why
not
and
target
go
for
six
million,
because
I
do
think
it's
still
like
it
does
feel
like
we're
starting
to
get
in
the
bear
market.
B
Now,
maybe,
like
I
don't
know,
things
are
a
little
bit
weird,
but
I
feel
like
this
is
the
time
for,
like
a
substantial
amount
that
we'll
all
benefit
from.
If
it's
there
and
like
you,
said
yesterday,
griff.
B
I
think
we
underestimate
how
wealthy
our
community
is
and
the
impact
our
rate
as
a
hundred
and
three
hundred
three
hundred
sixty,
because
I
think
a
hundred
target
go
it's
a
very
like
round,
and
then
the
minimum
goal
is
19
die
per
hour,
because
it's
the
same
that
we
all
have
been
compensated
during
the
cultural
build
while
doing
this
work.
B
So
I
feel
like
it's
a
fair
amount
and
then
the
max
go
as
200,
because
if
we
raise
21
million,
everyone
deserves
like
even
more
than
that
and
hatch
mentoring
rate
just
one
because
I
like
it
classic.
I
think
it's
very
easy
to
understand
it
like
this
and
hatch
period
30
days,
because
if
we
need
like
to
handle
all
the
fomo
people
that
are
coming
and
accept
them
in
the
trusted
seed
and
have
all
this
process,
it's
good
to
have
this
period
there
for
it
and
the
membership
ratio.
B
B
And
looking
at
this,
it
feels
like
somehow
balanced
and
also
thinking
about
the
builders
and
how
much
they're
receiving
in
comparison
with
the
backers
is
still
a
number
that
can
change,
because
the
builders
can
also
buy
into
the
hatch.
So
this
can
be
more
balanced,
depending
on
how
much
every
builder
decides
to
to
put
into
the
hatch
and
then
and.
D
B
We
move
to
the
one
minute
for
that
one.
Okay,
then,
a
very
high
support
required,
I
kind
of
like
the
rule
we've
been
having
in
the
tc
of
like
15
blocks
something.
So
if
we
have
a
support
of
85
percent
agree
with
what
griff
said
also
about
like
we
should
have
all
of
the
people
or
most
of
the
people
really
aligned
with
this
decision,
because
it's
probably
going
to
be
like
one
main
decision,
hopefully
and
the
minimum
quorum.
B
I
would
love
to
have
it
very
high
to
challenge
the
community
to
see
how
much
engagement
we
can
have.
It
still
blows
my
mind
that
we
got
55
voters
for
the
mvv,
and
I
think
this
is
like.
B
I
feel
like
the
whole
space
needs
to
know
that
that
it's
possible
for
us
to
get
past
this
narrative
of
like
voter
apathy
and
nobody
wants
to
engage
and
attention
like
we're,
we're
building
a
lot
of
interesting
things,
and
I
think
we
can
have
this
like
attention
being
moved
around.
B
A
Okay,
anyone
have
any
questions.
A
Well,
can
you
scroll
up,
I
mean
I
I
can
come
up
with
a
question.
If
no
one
else
has
anything
I'm
curious
about
why
it's
such
a
low
builders
percent.
The
whole
time
starts
off.
If
we
hit
the
min
goal,
builders
still
only
get
17
and
it
goes
down
to
as
low
as
eight
and
at
the
target
goal.
Thirteen
percent-
that's
a
really
low,
builder's
token
supply.
What
was
your
thinking
there.
B
Yeah,
I
just
thought
that
it
follows
a
cohesive
line
with
the
choices
we've
been
making
already
in
the
cultural
build
and
for
the
people
that
chose
to
be
compensated
partially
with
funds
and
partially
with
impact
hours.
The
compensation
they
had
was
19
diet
per
hour.
So
I
also
want
to
be
fair
with
the
people
that
had
this
choice,
because
perhaps
they
needed
this
funds
at
this
time.
So
so
the
people
that
chose
impact
hour
would
have
a
similar
compensation
at
minimum.
A
D
Okay,
perfect,
okay,
so
I
won't
get
into
politics.
You
all
know
what
how
I
feel
about
some
of
the
specific
parameters.
So
this
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
fork
of
an
eight.
I
also
like
some
of
septi's
parameters
and
yeah.
It
just
has
like
the
usual
stuff
for
a
proposal
of
mine.
Okay,
so
our
our
target
goal
is
set.
At
I
mean
our
minimum
goal
is
set
at
800k,
which
is
something
that
I
feel
that
most
people
find
reachable.
D
I
really
liked
sam's
idea
about
the
million
dollar
baby
so,
like
I
said
not,
you
can
set
it
as
our
target
goal
and
our
maximum
goal
is
12
12
million
our
impact
hour
rate,
like
I
brought
it
back
down,
because
I
also
I
feel
that
there
are
like
some
some
concerns
around
around
setting
it
it
high.
So
I
I
brought
it
a
little
bit
down.
D
I
won't
get
into
this.
I've
said
enough,
like
I've
said
enough
about
the
hatch
trivia.
The
membership
ratio
like.
I
also
want
to
give
a
a
chance
for
for
the
trusted
seat
to
participate,
and
I
set
it
high
because,
even
though,
like
we
have
a
hatch
tribute
like
I,
I
I
don't
want
them
to,
I
wouldn't
want
them
to
feel
limited
on
top
of
of
like
or
already
like
hatch
tribute
itself
as
a
limitation.
D
I
think
that
for
the
tec
is
pretty
straightforward,
like
what
we
want
to
achieve.
I
feel
that
there's
a
lot
of
value
that
the
community
is
giving
to
the
idea.
So
this
is
why
I'm
confident
in
just
like
yeah
like
staying
longer
and
trying
to
like
benefit
or
or
put
first,
the
people
that
are
like,
like
staying
staying
for
for
for
the
later
parts
of
the
of
the
project
hatch
period
30
days.
So
like
it's
just
what
I
think
it's
it's
it's
been
working
better.
D
I
also
think
that
is
something
that
the
community
agrees
upon.
In
my
last
I
in
my
last
proposal,
I
said
the
hatch
minting
rate
too
low
and
if
we
reach
like
our
maximum
goal,
is
going
to
be
such
a
mess,
so
I
I
brought
it
up
a
little
bit
more.
So
people
can
keep
a
better,
better
track
of
it.
This
is
how
it
looks
like
also
the
the
maximum
goal.
D
Also,
can
it
can
benefit
the
backers
a
lot
and
okay,
so
I'll
I'll
just
go
straight
to
the
to
the
dial
support
required
minimum
quorum.
Eight,
like
I,
I
brought.
I
brought
the
support
a
little
bit
down,
so
it
doesn't
like
it
is
like
at
88,
which
I
think
it
could
be
a
difficult,
but
80
even
psychologically
sounds
like
a
more
likable
to
happen.
D
I
also
like
I
agree
with
with
septi
with
with
the
tollgate
fee,
but
I
brought
it
like
a
little,
but
it's
just
like
yeah.
I
I
think
lower
than
a
grand
is
is
just
too
it's
it's
too
too
cheap,
but
yeah
like
1k
sounds
good
and
well
yeah.
I
think
that's
it.
I
think
my
time
is
up.
A
D
D
I
think
that
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
engagement,
so
yeah,
just
like
a
week,
sounds
like
even
like
basing
it
from
from
our
from
our
own,
like
voting
processes
and
and
how
just
I
think,
it's
just
like
a
community
rhythm
thing,
so
I
think
that
we
could
take
make
decisions
based
on
on,
on
the
same,
like
rhythm,
that
we've
been
developing
and
and
not
like,
have
like
super
strong,
like
like
limitations
or
or
set
of
of
time
around
it.
C
A
C
The
main
thing
what
it
is
in
this
business.
D
Minting
rape,
because
I
I
I
mean
also
for
for
like
a
a
low
circulation
model-
I
think
that
that
it
just
like
applies
better.
Maybe
I'm
I'm
I'm
based
because
of
my
experience
in
in
one
hive,
but
I
I
really
like
it.
I
I
feel
that
people
value
it.
I
feel
that,
like
these
kind
of
amounts
are
possible
for
for
people
that
work
and
put
time
and
effort
into
it,
and
it
also
likes
makes
them
value
if
they
have
like
a
whole
unit
of
it.
D
Any
questions:
okay,
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you,
griff
and
I'll
play
some
music.
I
think
we
ran
out
of
music.
A
Oh
thanks
chewie.
Well
I
I
did
have
one
more
question,
though
just
the
the
low
the
low
goal
why
the
low
goal
like
the
low
target
goal-
I
don't
aren't
you
worried
that,
like
you
know,
if
we
set
our
sights
at
1
million,
people
will
be
like
no.
We
hit
our
goal
and
like
not
care
anymore,.
D
I
hadn't
seen
it
that
that
way
like
I,
I
saw
it
the
other
way.
I
saw
it
more
of
something
that
can
be
like
open
enough
for
the
like
selective
group
that
we
already
have
and
yeah.
I
feel
that
it
just
like
gives
gives
people
time
to
yeah
like
maybe
participate
or
get
involved
in
in
in
other
ways,
but
I
feel
this
is
yeah.
I
I
don't
know
like
if
it
feels
right
like
doable.
I
don't
think
like
it.
D
It
gets
people
like
nervous
like
on
the
contrary
like
it's
it's
I
think
it's
a
wider
range
for
for
knowing
that
we
can
reach
a
a
goal,
but
also
knowing
that
we
can
go
much
higher
so
yeah.
Those
are
my
my
two.
A
Nice,
okay,
well,
everyone.
Thank
you
so
much
for
coming
we're
at
the
top
of
the
hour.
It
was
a
great
debate
and
don't
be
afraid
to
go
on
token
log
and
vote.
It
is
voting
time
today
is
the
day
we're
closing
it
during
the
community
call
so
rock
the
vote
like
definitely
go
out
there
and
if
you
wanted
to
participate
in
another,
if
you
wanted
to
participate,
it
looks
like
zeptimus
is
winning
eight's
not
far
behind.
A
We
got
crystal
ball
fork
easy
like
sunday
morning,
goldilocks
coming
in
the
the
goal
is
to
it's:
okay
like
he
doesn't.
Nothing
has
to
get
first
place,
but
the
more
all
of
your
votes
are
signals
and
they
will
be
counted
when
the
when
the
community
stewards
come
in,
like
goldilocks,
for
instance,
has
had
so
many
forks
that
you
know
those
votes
will
probably
kind
of
get
counted
together.
But
if
you
like
goldilocks
the
the
og
goldilocks
that
lauren
made,
you
probably
want
it
to
have
more
votes
than
goldilocks
v4
right.
A
So
there's
there's
all
these
individual
races
and
thoughts
that
you
might
want
to
consider
when
you're
getting
out
there
and
voting-
and
you
know
it's
quadratic
voting
so
the
for
it's
very
cheap
to
vote
on
vote
your
first
time
for
a
proposal
and
it
gets
exponentially
more
expensive
so
like
don't
be
afraid
to
spread
your
votes
around
pick
the
ones
that
you
like
and
signal
that
you
like
these
proposals.
Of
course,
if
you
don't
know
it
don't
feel
like
you
have
to
signal
and
we're
not
gonna,
this
is
anonymous.
A
So,
like
you
feel
free,
I
mean
it's
not
like
totally
anonymous,
but
no
one's
gonna.
Look
so
and
then
the
next
step
will
be
that
we,
the
coming
you
stewards,
are
gonna,
get
together,
try
to
hash
out
the
data
and
figure
out
which
ones
are
the
best
to
be
in
the
runoff
based
off
of
everyone's
opinions.
And
then
the
final
decision
will
be
made
next
week.
A
Yeah
and
the
final
vote
today
will
be
held
during
the
will
be
counted
I'll
just
scroll
through
in
the
video
and
community
call
at
the
during
the
parameters
of
the
time.
So
that
will
be
the
final
count
so
make
sure
to
get
out
there.
A
Thank
you
guys,
we'll
see
you,
oh
and,
and
there
are
more
parameter
calls.
Does
anyone
know
when
the
next
one
is?
I
have
to
look.