►
From YouTube: Praise Quant 9 - Review Session
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
And
me:
okay,
cool
yeah,
so
let's
get
started
with
intentions
and
distractions.
My
intentions
is
to
facilitate
and
hopefully
encourage
some
thoughtful
responses
from
the
quantifiers.
A
B
C
Intentions
would
be
to
actually
become
a
quality
quantifier.
C
I
participated
in
the
testing
process,
but
did
not
actually
complete
any
single
quantification
round
and
if
I
may
be
honest
and
something
I
kind
of
resisted,
participating
in
the
praise
process
entirely
because
of
some
aspects
where
I
was
generally
turned
off
by
it
previously,
but
with
how
things
are
developing
recently,
I'm
incredibly
encouraged
by
it
to
where
I'm
really
really
wanting
to
do
a
good
job
of
participating
in
this
process,
and
so
that
I
have
no
distractions
right
now.
Flip
focused
on
this,
and
I
will
pass
that
to.
D
Okay,
I'm
not
a
quantifier,
so
I'm
just
here
to
listen
to
people's
experience
specifically
for
rat
dashboard,
we're
working
on
creating
kind
of
individualized
feedback
for
quantifier,
based
on
the
data
so
like
to
know
like
for
quantifiers.
What
do
you
want
to
know
for
each
quantification
period
and
destruction
is?
I
might
need
to
jump
to
another
meeting
if
I
got
called
on
during
this
session,
I've
passed
two
septimus.
E
Thank
you,
sirway
yeah.
My
intention
is
actually
this
is
becoming
one
of
my
favorite
goals,
like
especially
like
the
second
part
when
we
get
to
the
chance
to
see,
like
you
know,
the
behavior
of
the
community,
with
the
praise
yeah
just
share
my
feedback
and
yeah
hang
out
in
here.
A
Cool,
well
maybe
we'll
pass
it
to
libya.
F
Thanks
yeah,
I
I
feel
that
too
zap
timis.
This
is
one
of
my
favorite
calls
it's
a
late
call
kind
of
a
late
call,
but
it
feels
I
don't
feel
tired
for
it
and
intention
yeah
just
to
take
notes,
listen
to
everyone
and
no
distractions.
Right
now,.
A
Nice,
okay,
oh!
What
am
I
doing
here
so
my
first
question
is:
how
comfortable
did
you
feel
with
your
quantification,
I'm
trying
to
remember
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
know
olivia.
You
were
in
this
one
forever
and
always
a
quantifier.
How
did
you
feel
about
this
round.
F
Yeah,
I
I
didn't
manage
my
time
so
well,
because
I
could
have
done
like
on
monday
that
I
have
I
had
more
free
time,
but
then
on
wednesday
I
had
eight
hours
of
calls,
and
I
remembered
I
hadn't
done
the
quantification
and
then
at
the
end
of
the
day
it
was
just
like,
so
we
felt
a
little
heavy
because
of
that,
but
totally
my
fault
and-
and
there
was
some
bugs,
I
think
in
the
in
the
in
the
new
ui,
because
the
the
sliders
were
moving
by
themselves.
F
I
was
even
like
I
was
so
tired
I
was
like
is:
is
this
my
head,
or
this
is
actually
happening
like
I
would
do
two
in
the
bottom
and
then
the
top
one
would
move
just
a
little
bit
and
then
it
would
move
back
to
the
number.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
was
happening
to
anyone
else,
but
and
also
duplicate
praises
when
sometimes
they
would
work,
but
then
sometimes
it
would
bring
the
original
value
to
zero,
which
was
also
when
using
that
blue
new
button.
Not
if
we
clicked
on
the
side.
F
F
C
What's
the
question
about
what
you
just
just
said
that
very
in
there
what
the
the
individuals
that
participate
most
frequently,
what
you
were
just
concerned,
that
they
were
already
they're
already
quantified
or
you're
concerned
that
they
are
being
what
like
over
quantified
or
not
not
based
on
duplicity
but
just
based
on.
F
I'm
just
noticing
my
very
personal
behavior
of
like
how
was
my
mind
feeling
when
I
saw
a
big
chunk
of
for
some
reason.
It
was
easier
to
quantify
like
let's
say,
10
praises
from
like
300
people,
then
50
praises
from
10
people.
B
Thanks
so
I
just
have
to
say
how
it
was
my
personal
experience
how
comfortable
I
felt.
I
think
you
I
I
tried
to
understand
in
the
beginning
how
I
would
set
the
standards
so
how
I
would
evaluate
a
phrase
like
this
is
more
valuable
than
that
and
it
was
a
cool
experience.
Also.
It
changed
the
way
that
I
started
praising
afterwards
and
it
I
had
yeah.
B
I
had
some
issues
like
leaving
it
whenever
I
had
to
duplicate
something
it
would
either
remove
all
the
of
the
values
that
I
had
already
added,
and
I
had
to
do
it
again
or
you
would
tag
like
this
is
duplicate
of
this
number
and
I
could
not
find
what
number
that
is
about.
B
B
A
B
Okay,
let's
see
acid
laser
is
in
the
car.
E
E
It
took
me
like
three
times
to
get
this
phrase,
and
then
I
also
had
this
thing
that
levy
said
like
sometimes
when
you're
marking
duplicates
they
go
all
to
zero
and
you
have
to
mark
them
again
but
other
than
that,
like
they,
I
felt
yeah
I
feel
like
actually
like
it
was
so
smooth
like
the
new
deployment,
is
fantastic,
it's
much
better
than
the
old
one.
So
yeah,
that's
my
experience,
I'll
pass
it
to
c-way.
A
Yeah,
so
maybe
this
next
question
I
have
is
for
sorting
out
duplicates
and
I'm
really
curious,
because
I
wasn't
a
quantifier,
so
I
actually
didn't
get
to
see
this
new
ux
and
all
the
wonderful
bugs,
but
I'm
wondering
like
based
on
this
new
thing
like
if
anybody
has
any
like
points
that
could
be
improved
besides
the
obvious
bug,
I'll
just
leave
it
open.
If
anyone.
B
Yeah,
sorry,
I
just
joined,
so
I
don't
know
if
I'm
having
like
a
new
a
newbies
excitement
only,
but
I,
when
I
was
teaching
phrases
quantifying,
I
thought
to
myself
what
are
the
key
words
that
I
see
in
each
phrase.
So,
even
if
it's
like
how
much
value
it
gives
or
how?
What?
What
is
this
phrase
about?
So
if
this
is
about
the
same
event,
this
is
about
the
same
action
that
is
being
praised.
So
it's
a
duplicate
and
I
thought
it
would.
B
It
could
be
helpful
to
have
like
key
words
slightly
in
bold
or
in
italic
or
some
way
to
I,
so
you
can
identify
and
you
just
you
read
everything,
but
you
just
need
to
pass
an
eye
and
see
whatever
what
what
this
is
about.
What
is
the
focus?
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible,
but
that's
the
only
thing.
Let's
say.
C
A
C
Apologize
because
I
I
haven't
reviewed
the
entire
all
the
literature
for
appraisers,
but
I
will
help
we'll
have
by
tomorrow,
but
so
just
based
on
the
duplication
aspect.
C
A
B
A
So
it's
like
it
takes
ten
percent
of
the
value
of
the
original
praise
and
so.
C
A
Does
have
value
yeah
thanks
and
then
to
paddy's
point
I
did
have
in
the
original
wireframe
and
again
I
haven't
been
able
to
see
if
it
was
implemented,
but
right
on
that
that
marking
duplicate
modal,
like
you,
can
have
like
a
keyword
search
which
I
think
would
like
be
like.
You
could
just
type
in
development
and
then
it
would
highlight
all
the
instances
that
say:
development
on
there.
A
F
I
think
you
would
be
helpful
with
this
new
ui
to
be
able
to
differentiate,
which
is
the
praise
you
are
pointing
as
a
duplicate
off
how
to
make
sense
of
like
now.
We
can
select
two
praises
and
they
both
select
in
the
same
time
like
in
the
same
way,
I
think
that's,
what's
giving
the
bug
that
is
bringing
to
zero,
because
one
of
them
that
you're
clicking
is
on
zero.
A
A
Cool
any
anyone
else
have
any
comments
around
this.
This
duplication
thing,
the
new,
ux
or
or
some
ideas.
F
Also,
I
think
it
would
be
helpful.
I
think
we
would
need
like
a
whole
brainstorming
session
just
for
that,
but
to
give
better
direction
on
how
to
mark
duplicates,
because
even
for
me,
it
feels
confusing.
F
Like
I
don't
know
if
from
one
week,
I
should
give
the
full
value
from
the
other
week
or
if
I
should
just
mark
the
whole
period
as
duplicates.
If
there
is
like
one
action
that
is
repeating,
or
I
think
what
what
patty's
saying
like
the
the
keywords
could
help
a
lot,
because
sometimes
a
praise
is
about
a
similar
thing,
but
it's
pointing
a
different
value,
and
then
that
starts
to
be
really.
C
A
Yeah
sure
yeah
we
can
it'll
be
tough
to
do
something
synchronous,
but
I
think
that's
a
great
idea,
libby
and
maybe
we'll
just
like,
pin
down
some
like
concrete
pain
points
and
then
like
try
and
get
feedback
on
them
and
then
update
the
quantifier
onboarding.
A
If
that's
all
right,
then
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
question,
were
you
able
to
find
enough
context
to
adequately
quantify
praise
and
I
know
patty?
This
was
your
first
time,
so
I'm
actually
really
curious.
B
I
did
for
almost
everything
there
was
one
call
that
is
that
someone
didn't
write
the
full
name.
They,
I
think
someone
said
lf
and
I
was
like
what
is
it
and
then
I
went
to
the
glossary.
Then
I
went
to
everyone
and
I
couldn't
find
it,
but
I
eventually
found
below
because
other
people
just
should
praise
for
for
the
meeting.
I
don't
remember
the
name,
but
then
it
was
a.
B
It
was
a
call,
so
I
found
contacts
amongst
other
praises,
but
if
people
didn't
do
it,
I
would
have
no
idea
what
it
was
and-
and
we
I
had
some
I
maybe
I
should
write
this
down
next
time.
I
had
some
events
that
I
had
no
idea
what
they
were
about,
so
I
sometimes
by
understanding.
If
that
was
inspirational
for
other
people,
I
would
raise
the
value
of
the
quantification
and
sometimes
if
it
seemed
technical,
because
I
remember
during
the
last
call,
if
it
was
technical,
we
would
raise
the
quantify
the
quantified
value.
B
So
I
also
did
it,
but
let
me
see
I
didn't
I
I
would
like
to
see.
I
don't
know,
if
we'll
do
it
today,
some
references
of
what
would
be
a
high
value
provided
so
should
I
give
144
144
to
only
one
specific
case
where
someone
organized
every
everything,
for
example
chewy
in
the
daoist
mexico
he
organized
and
he
presented
and
he
gave
workshops.
B
A
Would
it
be
helpful
for
you
to
look
over
all
the
other
data
from
like,
since
we
started
doing
it
since
july
last
year,.
A
A
Okay,
sorry,
I
got
distracted,
but
anyway
there's
there's.
There
is
a
shared
google
folder,
where
you
can
find
all
of
these
spreadsheets,
and
so
you
can
actually
look
up
like
who
gave
the
top
scores
to
what
praise
and
then,
if
you
really
want
to
go
deep
like
that,
would
give
you
a
good
reference
point
for,
like
generally,
what
people
assign.
A
Thank
you,
yeah,
no
problem
I'll
pass
it
to.
We
can
pass
it
to
zap
if
you
have
anything
yeah.
E
Thank
you.
Actually.
I
was
thinking
about
talking
about
just
this
phrase
and
no
like
when
you
like.
You
know
the
one
thing
like
I
give
this
chord
to
christopher.
It's
because,
like
he
was
actually
working
on
the
dashboard
and
the
prey
system,
and
I
was
like
dude
he's
rocking
it.
So
let's
put
a
high
score
in
here.
Like
I
don't
know
if
this
is
like
gamifying
or
not,
but
I
honestly
think
he
deserves
that.
So
that's
why
I
put
it
there
but
yeah.
F
F
A
F
A
That's
fine!
What
about
yourself
sep.
E
Not
really
that
I
recall
I
was
quantifying
the
people
I
used
to
work.
I
really
quantified
like
almost
on
the
stage.
B
A
Great,
that's
wonderful,
cool!
Well,
we'll
use
a
little
bit
of
this
next
half
of
the
call
to
go
through
some
of
the
data
just
for
funsies,
and
I
managed
to
get
this
new
rad
dashboard
repository
working
and
you
can
see
the
sheet
looks
a
lot
cleaner
than
it
has
in
previous
weeks.
Great
z-wave,
nugget
yeah.
So
do
you
feel
like
talking
about
any
of
this
z-wave
or
do
you
want
me
just
to
like
you
know,.
A
So
this
is
just
like
the
the
analytics
that
we
pulled
from
this
run
this
latest
round
so
from
march,
and
so
you
can
see
the
dates
here,
the
amount
of
tc
tokens
that
will
be
distributed
from
this
round
and
some
of
the
other
base
parameters
and
we're
looking
at
the
rating
distribution.
A
I
can't
even
get
that
on
my
screen,
man
like
5
89's
and
like
three
top
scores
of
144.,
so
very
sparing
I
if,
if
I
recall
from
march,
I
can
actually
recall
this
stuff
now
we're
so
close.
There
wasn't
really
anything
outstanding.
In
march
there
was
a
bit
of
like
carryover
from
the
daoist
in
mexico,
but
didn't
really
seem
like
anything.
Big
happened.
A
A
Wow
I've
been
unthrown,
which
makes
sense,
I
mean
you're,
doing
you're
still
doing
tons
of
stuff
in
the
reward
system
and
soft
gov
and,
like
you
know,
all
the
things
christopher's
up
there,
tam
zapp
myself,
chewy
lauren
nate,
and
we
keep
moving
down
here.
A
A
Praise
giver
sorted
by
total
score
yeah.
You
can
see
this
right
here.
Gene
I
know
by
a
long
shot,
but
soon
we'll
change
that
oh
and
then
myself,
wow,
nick
benz,
okay,
and
then
you
have
all
the
names
here
right
here
on
the
on
the
x-axis,
that's
cool!
Oh.
A
A
A
And
then
you
can
see
on
the
praise
flows
here.
This
is
just
another
interesting
representation
you
can
see
on
the
left
here.
This
is
the
praise
giver
and
on
the
right.
This
is
the
praise
receiver,
and
so
you
similar
to
what
we
see
in
the
last
bar,
you
can
see
mount
manu
addition
of
the
praise
and
what
are
these
numerical
values?
You
weigh
like
you
could
see
zap
and
it
says
248.
A
Okay,
all
right
cool,
so
yeah
you
can
see
here,
like
kind
of
like
the
flows
like
you
can
see
from
maddie
g
to
livia
average
score
41
average
score.
So
this
is
the
average
score
from
praise
that
maddie
g
sent
to
vive
iv,
for
instance
or
you're,
not
sure
either.
A
Great
question:
it
kind
of
I
think
it's
a
bit
tough
to
calculate.
I
don't
have
the
actual
algorithm
in
front
of
me,
but
I'm
sure
it's
not
it's
not
something
simple.
I
can
tell
you
that
gene,
but
I
can
throw
you
the
repo
if
you
want
and
you
can
dig
around
in
it
and
maybe.
A
A
All
right-
and
so
we
can
see
here-
this
is
the
spread
okay,
so
this
is
the
the
spread.
Is
the
difference
between
the
highest
and
the
lowest
score
given
for
an
instance
of
praise,
yeah.
A
Wow,
but
wouldn't
okay,
so
that's
the
maximum,
wouldn't
the
one
that
zeptimists
did
for
ignore.
This
praise
show
up
here
somewhere.
D
A
A
F
I
didn't
understand
so
the
max
was
144
and
what
was
the
minimum?
A
Is
there
a
way
this
is
just
an
html
file?
Is
there
a
way
to
like
easily
publish
this,
or
do
I
just
just
drop
the
html
file.
D
F
A
A
So
you
could
see
like
like
phil
here
was
conservative,
usually
still
like
used
like
a
very
small
range
to
give
quantifications
eduardo,
didn't
quantify
so
he's
a
flatline.
A
Cool
and
so
some
of
this
stuff,
like
z,
way
where
it
says
like
q3,
q1,.
D
A
G
A
A
And
that's
really
amazing:
how
did
you,
how
did
you
manage
to
wrangle
up
this?
This
statistic
here
like
mapping
together
all
the
duplicates.
D
Yeah,
I'm
actually
not
sure
whether
this
is
adaptable
for
the
new
ui,
but
in
the
old
one
you
would
say
for
each
price
for
quantifier
one
two,
three
four
did
they
mark
it
as
duplicate
or
not,
and
if
so,
which
duplicate
do
they
mark?
As
the
like
duplicate
all
right,
duplicate,
original
message,
yeah,
I
need
good
point.
I
need
to
check
the
current
ui.
How
is
that
done.
C
A
Well,
it's
just
like,
because
you
could
mark
you,
can
mark
the
original
praise
and
then
you
can
mark
are
the
duplicates
of
it.
So
you
could
mark
the
original
praise
as
praise
one
and
then
two
and
three
are
duplicates
or
you
could
mark
praise
two
as
the
original
and
one
and
three
is
duplicates.
A
C
So
can
I
is
there
any
data
that
shows
like
strength
of
role
bias
or
is
it?
Does
anybody
get
consistently
higher
scores
because
of
who
they
are
or
consistently
lower
scores?
You
can
see
who
they
are.
D
A
Yeah,
and
so
we
only
had
less
than
10
percent
disagreement
on
dismissals,
and
so
this
would
be
like
three
people
would
dismiss
it,
and
one
person
wouldn't,
or
vice
versa
or.
A
D
E
I
think
it'd
be
interesting
to
know
you
know,
because
I'm
feeling,
like
the
people,
I'm
is
usually
at
the
top
like
I
don't
know
if,
because
I
use
a
different
metric
that
than
the
rest
of
the
people,
or
maybe
it
is
just
coincidence,
I
don't
know,
but
maybe
like
yeah
check
like
you
know
what
quantifiers
are
doing
and
why,
like
you,
know
like,
why
is,
for
example,
people
that
is
being
quantified
but
septimus
have
more
praise
than
people
that's
quantifying
in
validity
or
whatever
and
yeah.
A
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
what
you're
saying
seth
but
like
seeing
my
own
personal
bias
in
like
how
I
quantify
people
so
like
being
able
to
see
my
scores
that
I've
given
over
time
to
like
livia
to
gene
to
griff
and
stuff,
and
so
seeing
being
able
to
see
you
know.
Maybe
I
didn't
like
livia
one
month,
and
so
I
get
really
bad
scores.
C
Like
on
an
individual
for
individual
basis
or
like
on
a
what
the
task
was
or
what
the
phrase
was
or
basis
like
you,
love
devs,
but
you
hate
community
members
or
you
know.
F
F
D
D
A
C
C
So
much
of
this
praise
process
could
be
done
by
the
praisers
and
not
by
the
quantifiers.
But
is
that
completely
not
the
idea
or.
F
Yeah,
I
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
leave
it
as
like
to
leave
quiet
free
for
the
people
who
are
praising
what
is
the
choice
of
words
they
have
because
I
think
this
is
very
like
cultural
enhancing.
You
know,
like
people
come
from
different
cultural
backgrounds
and
we
wouldn't
know
to
like
we
wouldn't
want
to.
A
A
Okay,
no
problem
and
yeah.
We
just
have
a
few
more
minutes
left
and
so
based
on
what
you
guys
experienced
from
this
quant.
Do
you
have
any
suggestions
to
the
the
praise
dashboard
or
the
system
itself.
F
F
A
A
Wonderful,
okay!
Well,
if
there's
no
other
comments
left,
I
think
we've
pretty
much
gone
through.
What
I
wanted
to
cover
in
this
review
call.
A
And
libby
will
be
capturing
some
of
like
the
big
points
in
here
and
hopefully
we'll
make
them
into
github
issues
and
we'll
work
through
them
and
make
it
even
better.