►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
So
welcome
everyone
to
this
rewards
working
group
session.
It
is
april
27th
and
what
do
we
have
to
talk
about
today?
We
have,
in
addition
to
status
updates.
I
think
if
I
we
will
demo
two
new
bot
bot
commands
that
will
be
really
useful,
especially
for
for
beginners
using
the
prey
spot,
and
if
I
understood
correctly,
chewie
wants
some
time
describing
the
tutorial
storyboard.
B
C
A
B
So
but
then,
let's,
let's
begin
in
the
beginning
and
and
start
with
the
stud
praise
status
updates.
Who
would
like
to
go
first.
A
A
So
that
should
be
fine.
Now
and
also
I
worked
on
other
small
bugs,
like
I
think.
When
period
was
closed,
the
screen
was
empty
and
what
else
also
we
were
getting
some
errors
when
user
is
not
that
mean
so
that
is
fixed,
and
next
I
will
try
to
figure
out
the
boat
and
maybe
help
wherever
we
in
the
future.
There.
D
You
go
I
so.
The
big
thing
that
I
got
done
was
set
up
tests
for
the
api
and
I
didn't.
I
didn't
write
tests,
but
I
set
up
the
testing
framework
for
the
api
and
I
wrote
tests
for
the
authentication
and
then
I
set
up
the
github
so
that
every
time
we
open
a
new
pr,
the
the
test
suite
that
we
have
on
the
api
will
have
to
be
run
and
all
the
tests
will
have
to
pass
before
we
can
merge
it.
D
And
then
I've
been
working
on
consolidating
all
the
logic
to
calculate
the
the
scores
throughout
the
application,
because
it
was
kind
of
scattered
and
hard
to
reason
about
so
consolidating
it
and
deep,
removing
any
like
redundant
logic
and
then
making
sure
it's
very
clear
code
and
then
I'll
write
tests
based
on
my
understanding
of
how
the
score
should
be
calculated,
so
that
we
can
be
very,
very
secure
and
and
know
that
that's
all
working
properly.
D
Yeah
there's
there's
a
few.
There
were
a
few
separate
implementations,
but
I'm
making
progress
on
on
de-duplicating
them
and
then
I'll
write
tests
on
them
and
confirm
that
my
assumptions
about
it
are
right
with
you
guys
great.
B
Okay,
mike,
while
you
look
into
your
audio
issues,
I
can
describe
what
I've
been
doing,
so
you
just
emerge,
you
put
a
request.
B
The
different
components
of
appraise,
which
means
that
we
can
package
all
the
different
subsystems
in
in
docker
containers
and
and
more
easily
run
them
in
a
production
environment.
So
this
is
a
step
in
the
direction
of
making
the
system
more
more
easily
installed
and
easily
managed
and
easily
upgraded
and
so
on.
So
it's
the
first
step
in
that
direction.
B
Next
steps
will
be
to
make
sure
that
these
docker
images
are
automatically
built
on
github
and
pushed
to
the
github
packages
registry
and
that
we
also
include
a
mechanism
to
download
the
and
and
upgrade
the
images
when
there
are
new
ones.
So
we
need
to
figure
out
that
structure
with
the
maybe
the
dev
builds
and
and
the
production
builds
and
a
staging
server
and
a
production
server
so
that
we
yeah
can
try
out
the
top
before
before
it
goes,
live
basically
using
this
new
methodology.
B
B
I'm
sorry
we'll
we'll
we'll
continue
and
if
you,
if
you
get
things
going
again
just
scream
and
and
you
you
will,
they
can
take
the
mic.
B
E
Matter,
yeah,
if
you
have
the
bot
running,
it
would
be
all
right.
Mine
is
taking
a
little
bit
long
longer
to
run.
I
I
just
fetched
the
latest
branch
yeah.
B
I
think
this
should
be
good
to
go
so
this
is
a
in
in
the
test.
My
personal
test
discord,
channel
server.
E
All
right,
so
we
added
two
commands.
One
is:
who
am
I
that's
just
giving
the
user
some
information
about
themselves
like
which
ethereum
wallet
address?
Are
they
using
what
user
roles
they
have
and
their
address
out
there
activations?
E
And
the
second
command
we
added
is:
who
am
is
help
and
that's
just
to
get
some
help
text
for
place
so
either
you
could
just
run
forward
slash
help
or
you
could
give
in
a
parameter
to
that.
So
you
can
mention
the
command
so,
for
example,
activate
forward
press
admin,
omr.
E
So
it
just
gives
an
overview
of
the
command
and
usage
information.
We
could
make
this
more
detailed
in
the
future
if
needed,
but
for
now
I
think
this
surprises.
B
I
think
these
these
two
new
commands
are.
I
hope
that
they
will
be
super
helpful
for
for
especially
for
new
communities
that
that
a
community
manager
can
just
redirect
people
to
you
know
if
you're
uncertain,
if
you're
activated
or
not,
and
that
kind
of
stuff
just
type
the
who
am
I
command.
If
you
wonder
how
praise
works,
just
try
to
type
this
slash
help
command
to
get
some
help.
E
Because
that
I
there
are
other
updates
that
I've
been
working
on
one
is
the
the
praise
reasons.
Previously.
You
might
notice
that
a
while
quantifying
place
that
some
of
the
praise
text
had
some
weird
numbers
in
them
and
those
are
discord
ids.
So
there's
an
issue
for
it
for
that
on
normalizes,
that
into
user
names
and
role,
names
and
channel
names.
E
And
I
think
open
pr
for
that
tonight,
I'm
not
sure
when
but
yeah
that
actually
do
add
it
to
the
front
end
yeah,
that's
pretty
much.
It.
A
B
So
unless
we
have
mike
on
the
my
mic
on
the
mic,
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
next
topic,
which
is
a
source
cred-
and
I
don't
have
much
to
say
about
that
and
mateo
is
not
here-
we
will
most
likely
remove
this
as
a
as
an
item
and.
E
To
say
so,
there
was
a
meeting
tracker
board
that
I
was
working
on.
I
still
haven't
tested
it
out
on
us
deployed
source
crit
instance,
and
that's
mostly
because
I
wasn't
able
to
replicate
the
the
tc
source
credits
in
so
it
would
be
great
if
you
or
but
whoever
set
up
our
instance.
E
B
I
I
think
it
would
be
mateo
helps
you
with
that.
I
I
was
not
never
involved.
Setting
up
the
instance.
B
Yeah
and
regarding
the
the
repositories
we,
we
need
to
add
some
more
repositories
to
track
to
source
cred
and
I
just
sent
mateo
the
the
full
list
of
repositories
that
we
should
track
for
from
commons
build
and
in
to.
In
my
to
my
view,
I
think
we
should
track
all
repositories
that
have
had
activity
since
mid
since
july
last
year,
so
this
it's
the
same
same
time
period
that
we
track
everything
else.
We
track
praise
for
during
that
time
period
we
track
we
will.
That
is
the
time
period.
B
We
will
look
back
when
calculating
credit
and
grain
from
source,
cred,
and
also
the
repositories
we
look
at
are
only
those
who
have
had
activity
during
that
that
period.
B
No
so
nagano
or
t
way
would
you
like
to
give
a
status
update.
F
Yeah
well,
first
of
all
to
keep
the
record
straight.
It
was
actually
g
way
who
noticed
the
issues
with
the
numbers
so
praise
to
her
and
yeah.
Well,
we
we
are
going
forward.
We
had
we
had
a
sink
and
we
have
kind
of
a
list
of
stuff.
We
want
to
continue
developing
the
last
changes.
F
I
did
where
what
we
talked
about
changing
with
the
structure
of
the
of
the
repo
and
working
a
bit
on
how
the
how
the
new
system
gets,
it
gets
used
to
make
it
a
bit
user-friendlier.
F
We
now
also
remove
quantifiers,
who
didn't
show
up
to
distribute
from
the
actual
distribution
of
rewards,
so
people
don't
get
tc
tokens
for
not
doing
anything
and
yeah.
I
think
the
plan
is
to
maybe
in
in
around
a
week
switch
the
the
main
switch
the
system
we
are
using
now
to
the
main
and
and
start
using
that.
I
think
mitch
will
have
to
sync
with
you
to
kind
of
clear
any
any
doubts
that
it
should
be
easier
to
use
and
more
practical
and
yeah.
A
Not
really
well,
I
guess,
follow
up
from
the
analysis
I
posted
on
the
forum
last
week
about
the
disagreement
on
duplication
and
dismissals.
I
didn't
see
much
discussion
going
on
on
the
forum.
A
I
I
don't
know
how
we
usually
approach
this.
Do
we
encourage
more
discussion?
Do
we
directly
incorporate
that
into
a
qualifier
guideline
or
like
any
suggestion
how
to
go
forward.
G
C
A
B
And
and
when
it
comes
to
the
the
rat
dashboard
in
in
order
for
us
to
be
able
to
do
a
a
the
the
first
token
distribution,
correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong,
these
are
the
steps
that
we
need
to
still
to
complete.
We
need
to
make
sure
the
the
calculations,
the
the
price
score.
Calculations
are
correct,
so
that
we
know
the
exported
data
is
correct
and
we
need
to
update
the
the
data
in
in
the
the
repository.
B
So
we
know
that
we
know
that
we
have
the
right
export
and
the
right
data
in
the
repository
and-
and
we
need
to
then
know
that
with
the
the
dashboard,
the
red
dashboard
works,
as
does
its
thing
correctly
and,
and-
and
it
currently
does
or
is
that
is,
do
we
have
a
check
mark
on
that?
Or
do
we
want
to
bring
in
this
new
version
before
we
do
the
first
distribution,
or
is
it
either
or.
F
Yeah,
I
think
we
definitely
want
to
use
this
this
new
version
to
because
the
one
the
main
repo
is
a
bit
updated
and
yes,
yeah
yeah,
probably
swap
it
definitely.
Yes,.
B
Okay,
so
that,
then
we
will
await
your
merge
and
and
and
then
when
we
have
the
correct
data
and
the
correct
dashboard
that
then
we
can
run
it
and
test
it
and
before
paying
paying
out.
A
B
Yeah,
I
would
suspect
that
if
it's
not
controversial,
if
it's
not,
if
no
one
contests
the
analysis,
then
there
won't
be
that
much
discussion
and
what
I
saw
from
your
analysis.
It
wasn't
super
nice
as
they
say
that
was
what
wasn't
much
to
contest
there.
So
so
it's
you
know
just
adding
this
to
the
become
sort
of
evergreen
content
that
could
support
us
in
the
in
the
future.
A
B
Yeah,
perhaps
we
could
I
I
don't
know
matt.
What
do
you
think?
Do
you
think
the
the
praise
score
calculation
upgrade
fix
will
be
online
and
merged
before
before
the
end
of
this
week,.
B
Because
we
have
this
weekly
rad
dashboard
meeting
on
mondays,
yeah.
C
B
G
Way
better
than
that
that
stupid
conference
is
over
jeez
man.
No,
it's
it's!
It's
going
better!
This
week,
a
lot
more
people
are
showing
up
and
getting
stuff
done.
So
we.
B
G
G
Oh
man
geez,
you
know
anyway,
business
as
usual
I'll
be
closing
the
round
in
about
nine
hours.
We'll
have
our
insight
call
on
tomorrow,
we'll
open
up
for
march
march?
Are
we
at
march
already
yeah
or
with
february?
I
can't
remember
anyway.
The
next
month
will
go
up
on
friday
and
we'll
open
it
and
then
yeah
keep
going
from
there.
H
G
B
I
think
so
we
are.
We
are
retiring.
We
we're
retiring
the
old
bot
from
yeah,
it's
very
soon,
sorry
in
in
may.
It
should
not
produce
any
any
results,
but
we
also
need
to
decide
on
whether
we
should
retire,
the
the
telegram
bot
completely
and
be
a
and
don't
have
a
telegram,
but
at
all
or
if
we
should
live.
We
have
to
live
with
having
to
export
and
import
data
from
generated
by
the
telegram
bot
each
month.
E
I
think
it
would
be
neat
if
you
could
make
a
bot
for
telegram
that
integrates
with
the
new
system,
rather
than
you
know
importing
praise
if
he
could
spend
time
doing
that.
B
B
A
B
H
A
G
G
Yeah
after
that,
I
don't
think
there's
anything
to
add
for
quants
I
mean
I
can
see
the
maybe
this
is
more
reward
board,
so
I'll
I'll.
Just
let
you
keep
going.
B
So
reward
board
I'd
like
to
have
a
quick
look
at
the
the
forum
post.
That's
a
safety
and.
B
Sorry,
in
short,
this
is
this
is
what
it's
all
about.
The
reward
board
have
been
allocated,
this
budget
55
000
slightly
more
than
55
000
tec
in
the
initial
buy-in
to
be
used
for
rewards,
and
we
have.
We
propose
to
spend
these
funds
in
a
way
that
makes
the
the
funds
last
until.
B
Of
course,
we
propose
that
the
contributor
contributors
get
90
for
each
price
period
of
the
allocation
that
quantifiers
get
seven
percent
of
each
each
allocation
and
the
reward
board
members
get
three
percent
for
each
period
in
when,
when
we
have
done
trials
on
this,
it
turns
out
that.
B
F
B
B
And
these
are
the
first
12
reward
rounds,
so
we
started
the
first
round
mid
month
of
july
july
12th,
which
was
after
the
the
the
hatch.
B
During
all
these
first
11
months,
we
have
allocated
a
hundred
percent
of
the
the
the
budget
towards
price
rewards.
That
is
because
source
credit
does
not.
Support,
does
not
support
that
you
we
can
go
in
and
do
retroactive
credit
and
grain
distributions
for
for
a
month.
B
For
an
old
month,
so
so
we
have
to,
we
have
the
system
only
supports
making
a
credit
grain
distribution.
As
of
the
the
day
you
press
the
button
and
then
you
can
choose
to
look
a
certain
time
back
into
the
future.
So
that
is
what
we
will
do
beginning
in
the
month
of
june.
We
will
start
allocating
25
of
the
budget
towards
space,
but
the
the
contributions
that
will
be
rewarded
by
source
credit
will
not
only
be
the
contributions
from
june
2022.
B
They
will
be
the
contribution
that
has
had
the
contributions
that
has
been
made
for
the
last
12
months
and
that
will
always
be
like
a
trailing
12
months.
When
we
do
the
the
token
distribution
in
july
of
this
year,
we
will
look
at
july
and
all
contributions
going
back
12
months,
which
means
that
someone
that
made
a
significant
contribution
like
six
months
ago
will
get
a
fairly
small
amount
of
source.
B
B
Yes,
the
the
time
will
come
when
the
funds
run
out.
We
were
initially
planning
to
make
the
funds
last
only
12
months,
the
the
the
promise
before
the
initial
buy-in.
B
What
was
that
the
reward
board
of
funds
would
last
six
months
and
six
months
from
from
january
roughly
when,
when
the
commerce
upgrade
and
the
initial
buy
was
was
until
june,
but
we
we
proposed
that
we
make
the
funds
last
two
additional
months,
which
sort
of
gives
us
some
time
to
write
a
new
proposal
and
also
the
debate
and
propose
debate
that
proposal
and
secure
funds
for
for
the
next
period,
whether
that
period
would
be
in
another
full
12
months
or
a
shorter
period.
That
will
be
a
later
discussion.
H
I
think
another
thing
like,
I
think
it's
not
in
the
post,
but
we
were
talking
in
the
like
with
you.
Christopher
nagin
is
like
the
fans
and
we
have
like
two
months.
If
we
don't
pass
a
proposal
in
next
two
months,
we'll
have
some
spare
money
for
two
months
before
making
like
the
new
proposal.
E
B
If,
if
that
didn't
come
across
clear
that,
that
is
what
I
meant
we
we
have
allocated
for
for
slightly
less
slightly
more
than
one
one
year,
so
that
we
have.
We
have
funds
for
two
additional
months
of
debating
and
proposing
a
new,
a
new
budget
for
the
following
period,
so
that.
B
B
So
do
we
does
anyone
have
any
questions
about
about
this?
This
proposal?
The
proposals
is
out
on
the
forum.
B
So
we
we
have
access
to
the
funds
now
we're
asking
the
community
or
we
we
propose
to
the
community
that
this
is
how
we
would
like
to
use
the
funds,
and
so,
unless
we
we
get
a
clear
signal
from
from
someone
or
some
group
that
that
you
would
see
some
other
use
of
the
funds
we
will
continue.
B
We
will
not
do
a
snapshot
vote
or
anything
like
that
unless,
unless
we
get
a
clear
signal
from
the
community
that
that
is
needed,
if
we
don't
get
any
pushback,
we
will
continue
with
that
this
as
planned
and
quite
soon.
Hopefully,
what
do
you
say
mitch,
maybe
end
of
next
week?
Where
would
when
would
we
like
to
do
the
first
token
payout.
G
B
Yeah,
currently
today
it
is
but
like
matt
described,
we
would
we
going
to
upgrade
the
the
price
score
calculation
to
make
sure
that
the
score
is
calculated
correctly
everywhere
and
then
upgrade
to
the
new
rand
dashboard
version
to
make
sure
that
the
distribution
calculations
are
are
all
all
right
and
and
then
we're
good
to
go.
A
G
G
B
Yeah
mitch
did
you
have
anything
else?
You
said
you
had
something
else
that
was
more
of
a
reward
board
issue.
A
B
C
C
But
what
I
changed
from
the
last
one
is
just
add
the
activate
to
like
before
it
was
that
we
needed
to
give
permission
to
anyone,
but
now
we
just
activate
and
is
the
the
new
commands
you
said:
why
are
they
already
working.
B
C
Okay,
then
I'll
add
the
new
comments
here
too,
and
then
explaining
how
we
use
the
forward
command.
And
what
do
we
praise
then?
Based
on
the
discussions
we've
been
having
in
the
review
calls?
I
just
put
some
question
prompts
out
beside
each
one
of
the
topics
that
we
we
would
praise
so
being
kind.
B
Yes,
the
the
the
twitter
tracking
bot
is
far
away
off.
Okay,.
C
And
then
for
the
praise
etiquette,
I
thought
this.
The
three
points
from
gua
analysis
were
good
ones
for
for
people
who
are
praising
so
the
general
mention
of
the
project,
but
not
the
actual
contribution
and
then
I'll
put
some
examples
of
this
and
action
related
to
other
te
projects
and
then
actions
that
are
unrelated
to
tv
projects,
and
this
turned
to
be
kind
of
like
tears
for
praising.
C
Okay,
cool
awesome,
so
I'll
add
those
in
here
and
then
I
was
thinking
the
quantifier
guide
could
be
separate
because
I
think
it's
confusing
to
have
like
good
at
etiquette
for
praising
and
good
one
for
quantifying.
So
maybe
we
could
separate
those
posts
and
then
for
quantifiers
just
give
one
that
is
straight
forward
for
quantifying.
G
C
G
G
B
Have
the
forward
command
start?
Has
it
been
used
any
yet?
B
I
don't
think
so,
because
that
then
one
aspect
of
one
reason
that
makes
the
praise
low
quality
is
that
it
comes
out
from
the
same
person.
Then
that
goes
away
at
least.
H
I
just
wanted
to
say
what,
if
in
the
community
call
instead
of
you
know
having
like
45
seconds,
which
I
agree,
it's
a
rush.
We
have
like
two
places
that
you
can
do
like
only
two
or
even
one,
if
needed,
but
instead
of
putting
an
amount
of
time
on
on
the
amount
you
can
praise
just
put
amount
of
price.
You
can
do.
B
A
C
Yeah,
it's
funny
we're
having
this
conversation
all
over
again.
I
I,
I
think,
the
big
the
person
who
is
most
against
us
doing
that
was
griff
because
he
was
saying
people
are
not
gonna
write
down
their
praise
and
I
think
there
could
be
a
community
education
on
that.
But
then
I
also
agree
that
a
lot
of
the
praise
would
be
missed.
That
people
who
are
verbally
speaking,
wouldn't
write
it
down
and
then
that
just
wouldn't
be
captured.
H
I
mean
it's
just
an
idea,
so
if
you
have
like
that,
you
know,
if
you
only
say
two
like
you
can
be
more
like
explain
better
and
then
the
rest.
You
can
just
type
it
in
into
the
into
the
chat,
and
then
we
have
like
you
know.
People
is
what's
the
point,
though,
like
like
people
using
the
spot,
they
are
giving
like
a
long
clarification
on
what
they
are
praising
and
then,
if
they
want
press
more
people,
they
can
just
do
it
on
the
chat.
G
A
It
would
be
possible
to
like,
instead
of
giving
a
minute
per
person,
give
you
10
minutes
for
everyone
to
write
the
praise
on
on
the
praise,
channel
and.
B
Yeah,
that
sort
of
defeats
the
whole
thing
that
then
then
the
10
minutes
of
live
interactive
praising
becomes
10,
10
minutes
of
silence,
which
is
a
a
totally
different
thing.
But
I
guess
this
is
perhaps
it's
a
stewards,
stewards
issue
to
discuss
and
propose
and
make
changes
to
the
community
processes.
The
the
new
press
system
supports
the
either
way
you're
using
the
forward
command.
We
at
least
we
get
rid
of
that
the
confusion
of
who
sent
the
the
praise.
B
H
G
G
F
Yeah
I
mean,
I
also
think
that
a
reason
why
the
the
life
praise
is
so
low
quality
is
because,
since
you
only
have
40
seconds,
you
want
to
cram
and
anybody-
and
you
really
think
you
should
brace
so
maybe
reducing
it
to
like
two
or
three
makes
the
praise
also
better
quality.
Just
because
you
have
more
time
to
focus
on
exactly
what
you're
praising.
B
I
would
like
to
nudge
this
topic
of
discussion
to
the
stewards
call
or
some
other
call,
and
and
but
but
maybe
chu
is
not
here
right.
H
H
B
H
I
mean
the
idea
yeah,
it's
like
posted,
like
every
two
weeks.
Every
you
know
every
time
like
there
is
a
price
point
and
then
yeah
at
some
point.
We
were
saying
like
do
our
first
global
analysis
with
the
first
distribution
and
that
probably
involves
more
than
one
month
but
yeah.
We
can
discuss
the
details
on
on
the
other
call.
F
Yeah,
I
still
have
one
one
question
that
I
that
I
remember
was
because
we
were
talking
about
during
the
first
distribution
like
next
week
or
or
at
least
soon.
How
is
the
situation
with
all
the
missing
ethereum
addresses
for
the
first
distribution?
F
H
E
G
I
gave
the
data
that
christopher
gave
me
yesterday
of
the
missing
activated
quantifiers
to
edu,
and
so
you
know
if
anyone
wants
to
help
out
edu
reach
out
to
all
these
people,
you
know
I
think
he
needs
some
help
in
communitas,
there's,
like
hundreds
of
people
still
to
contact.
B
G
B
So
that
this
is
not
an
issue
for
the
first
payout,
like
we
discussed
in
in
amsterdam,
I
think
that
the
the
it
will
become
an
issue
when
we're
do
when
we
do
the
second
payout,
because
then
we
need
to
start
keep
keeping
track
of
who
has
activated
since
last
payout
and
who
should
also
have
not
only
be
paid
for
the
second
payout,
but
also
get
redirectively
for
the
first
payout.
B
So
once
we
start
doing
payouts,
we
really
need
to
come
up
with
a
smart
solution
to
that,
and
I
I
don't
I
think,
do
you
think
that
the
the
smart
solution
is
to
keep
payout
lists
and.
B
And
other
data
in
the
github
repository
for
each
period
we
keep
track
of
who
who
should
get,
how
much
funds
and
who
has
been
paid,
how
much
funds?
And,
as
long
as
we
have
those
lists
for
all
the
periods,
we
can
write
a
smart
script
that
adds
together
and
compares
and
yeah
gives
us
the
answers.
We
need.
F
B
B
But
then,
of
course,
I
also
have
this
idea
about
this.
Super
cool
rewards
claim
rewards
dot,
eth
the
the
new
service,
where
you
we
can
do
payouts
without
knowing
the
the
ethereum
addresses.
But
then
we
need
a
a
solid
solidity
dev
and
a
front
end
and
a
backup
dev
for
a
month
or
so
and
we'll
can.
We
can
hack
that
up.
F
F
B
B
Pedro
and
vitor
er
yeah
pedro,
he's
already
doing
some
work
on
the
on
the
front.
End
and
vitor
had
some
issue
with
the
the
database
and
he
was
working
on
that
today,
but
I
am
yeah.
G
I
I
know
that
you
guys
have
a
limited
bandwidth
and
but
there's
just
like
such
a
backlog
of
features
and
bugs
that,
like
it's,
it's
affecting
our
review
sessions
because
we're
like
trying
to
analyze
the
praise,
dashboard
and
the
process,
but
the
process
is
never
changing
because
there's
no
developer
updates.
You
know.
B
Okay,
that
is
new
information.
What
what
we
that
is,
not
how
we
see
things
from
the
dev
team.
Like
there's
a
long,
we
are
sort
of
making
a
lot
of
effort
to
do
infrastructure,
work
and
packaging
this
to
make
it
easily
installable
and
and
like
new
features,
is
not
like
the
top
top
of
our
list.
Of
course,
they're
fixing
bugs
like
this
price
score
thing.
So
what
would
you
say
what
what
is
the
the
the
things
that
you
acutely.
G
G
B
Well,
we
haven't
talked
about
much
other
than
the
the
ability
to
mark
more
than
one
pace
as
a
duplicate.
As
far
as
I
know
when
it
comes
to
feature
with,
you
know,
quantify
related
stuff.
B
A
B
Yeah
the
the
the
road
map
and
that
ends
in
the
next
after
two
two
more
quantifications
but
yeah
yeah,
the
the
multiple.
B
We
are
aiming
for
for
this
stable
beta
version,
where
we
can
install
the
system
for
for
common
stack
and
and
and
give
it
as
well.
So
that
is
also
like
the
top,
the
top
on
our
list.