►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Yeah
yeah
I'll
be
honest.
It
was
a
lot
of
work.
Burning
Man,
it
was
probably
the
worst
weather
I've
seen
in
seven
years
of
going
there.
It's
like
insane
like
100,
kilometer,
wind
storms,.
B
A
B
A
C
C
Yeah,
a
grip
was
like
positive
before,
like
yeah,
you
should
go
with
your
family
of
yeah.
Of
course,
like
that's,
it
sounds
like
one
of
the
worst
punishments
imaginable
stuck
in
in
the
desert,
too
cranky
small
kids
with
no
water
and
like.
B
A
B
B
A
B
A
Okay,
well,
let's,
let's
dive
into
some
of
this
stuff
here
so
I
kind
of
did
away
with
a
lot
of
the
stuff
we
had
before
and
just
kind
of
like
thinking
of
what
we
need
to
do
and
then
catching
up
on
those
like
work,
streams,
I,
guess,
I!
Guess
we
can
start
with
intentions
and
distractions
and
I'll,
say
intentions
is
to
push
the
latest
rewards.
A
And
facilitate
distractions
is
there
is
someone
else
in
the
room
also
having
a
call
so.
A
And
and
I'll
pass
it
to
you
again.
B
Thanks
Mitch,
well
yeah
intentions,
kind
of
see
how
this
yeah,
the
other
words
group
system,
is
going
to
work
in
the
future.
I've
seen
you
wanna,
you
wanna
be
a
steward
and
she
kind
of
kind
of
get
into
the
new
the
new
flow
of
it
all
and
destruction's
none.
So
that's
good
as
to.
C
Get
up
to
date
with
the
sort
of
the
overall
to-do
list
for
the
working
group
get
a
you
know
an
over
good
overview.
What's
what's
next
and
and
then
now
the
distractions
are
none.
A
Okay,
cool
so
we'll
go
through
the
top
of
the
agenda
and
if
you
guys
want
to
add
anything
in
just
speak
up
otherwise
going
from
here,
our
give
Garden
proposal
passed,
we've
got
20
000
X
die
in
the
in
the
Dow.
I'm
gonna
grab
that
right
now,
so
that's
there.
A
So
the
biggest
blocker
will
be
figuring
out
how
to
do
that
through
this
doubt,.
A
Foreign,
how
to
make
the
swap
using
the
Aragon
agent
I
have
I
have
some
experience
using
frame
to
make
blockchain
interactions
using
as
an
Aragon
agent.
B
C
And
I
think
we
need
to
solve
is
is
to
let
the
Dow
sign
the
transaction
on
on
the
ABC.
B
A
A
So
that
could
be
a
technical
hurdle.
Yes,
last
option
is
to
send
to
a
trusted
Ernie
I,
eat
member
wallet,
make
the
Swap
and
send
back.
A
B
A
C
A
Trustful
and
you're
going
on
there
anything
else
to
add
to
this.
A
Really
good
I
think,
yes,
okay,
cool
rewards,
catch
up,
distribute
rewards
from
June
18th
to
July
31st.
A
This
is
specifically
because
I
think
this
July
31st
is
up
until
what
we've
Quantified
from
praise,
if
I'm
not
wrong.
So
the
active
run
right
now
for
quantification
is
from
June
31st
until
September
11th.
So
we
could
put
something
up
as
early
go
ahead.
Sorry.
C
A
So
yeah
we
need
to
figure
out
how
much
we
need
to
send
based
on
those
days,
how
much
of
the
vesting
needs
to
be
released
from
Source
cred
and
then
just
like
set
up
the
Forum
post
and
then
we'll
get
the
numbers,
make
the
Forum
post
and
then
do
the
distribution.
Basically.
B
B
Is
the
stuff
isn't
exported
yet
right
from
from
the
database
to
the
CSV?
No.
B
B
B
A
B
B
B
B
C
Them
on
I
think
yeah
and
the
details
are
on
the
source.
Cred
amounts
at
least
I.
Don't
remember
them
straight
up,
but
I
guess
yeah
foreign.
A
B
B
B
C
B
A
Distributions
the
total
after
that
is
four
with
six
destroys
remaining.
C
A
B
A
Great
any
more
questions
on
this
topic.
B
How
are
we
with
people
to
vote
on
the
Aragon
stuff
when
you
put
them
up
like?
Are
people
away
still
or
that.
C
Think
we
should
add
that,
as
a
separate
separate
point,
maybe
to
have
a
look
at
the
rewards
team
member
members,
okay,
yeah.
A
That's
that's
kind
of
what
I
put
in
there
today.
It
was
like
you
know,
I,
don't
know
if
these
people
are
still
around
particularly
Viva
and
chewy.
C
Vai
has
a
lot
to
do
in
school.
I
I
had
a
so
he's.
Definitely
around
I
had
a
long
chat
with
him
two
times.
A
A
Sure
that's
fine,
but
the
thing
is
like:
if
he's
working
on
praise,
that's
like
that's
no
longer
like
a
Tec
thing.
C
A
Yeah
yeah,
so
that's
the
thing
it's
like.
We
have
all
these
people
who
don't
really
do
anything
except
for
vote
and,
like
I,
don't
even
know
if
they
not
a
lot
of
people
but
a
few
more
people
so
like
they
don't
have
the
context.
They're
not
really
involved,
but
they're
still
getting
paid
a
percentage
of
each
distribution
right.
A
To
basically
like
to
basically
just
vote,
you
know
when,
when
we
say
vote.
C
B
C
Of
responsibilities,
and
that
is
I've
long
since
gone
yeah
and
I
think
it
should
be
reinstated.
C
C
The
team
you
should
yeah,
if
you're
part
of
the
team,
you
should
have
a
something
to
do
in
the
working
group,
except
for
just
signing
off
on
the
votes.
If
there
is
something
to
do
that
is
sort
of
the
the
scope
of
the
working
group
is
maybe
smaller
now
than
than
it
was
so.
A
A
Yeah
you're
just
going
full-time
Dev
on
like
praise
as
a
product
from
the
common
stack
and
doing
like
doing
the
architecture
for
like
rad
with
nugging,
which
is
also
going
to
be
a
common
stack
thing.
C
Yeah
and
I'm
happy
to
stay
on
as
a
working
group
member
for
like
the
rest
of
the
year
or
something
and
then
possibly
step
out
of
that
role
as
well.
Now
it
depends
on
what
happens
with
the
TC
and
and
everything
else,
but
I'm
happy
to
be
part
of
the
working
group.
A
Okay,
cool
well,
yeah
I
was
taking
that
into
consideration
and
since
they
cut
the
stewards,
funding
back
in
June
nobody's
really
getting
paid
for
doing
this
work.
So
I
was
like
well,
I
want
to
get
paid,
or
at
least
pay
General
magic
for
the
stuff
that
I'm
doing
here
so
I
mean
I'm.
Gonna
hit
this
with
the
Forum.
A
This
is
my
role
proposal
to
effectively
become
the
steward
of
the
working
group
and
take
a
take
some
of
the
responsibilities
that
Christopher's
been
doing
and
do
them
so
I
mean
go
ahead
and
review
that
and
leave
me
some
comments
since
I
think
you
people
are
the
most
in
the
know
of
what
I've
been
doing
here.
B
Yeah
one
quick
question:
sorry:
yeah:
what
about
what
about
Libya
I?
Think
right
now
you
work
kind
of
Christopher
kind
of
sharing
the
the
stewardship
role
like.
A
A
A
C
No,
my
initiative
feedback
on
this
proposal
is
that
it
it
looks,
super
straightforward
and
reasonable
100
I,
maybe
the
yeah
from
the
reward
for
treasury
I,
I
I,
think
we
have
said
that
the
the
money
we
get
from
the
TC
is
for
for
rewards
payments.
C
A
C
C
C
No
and
one
option
would
be
it
to
to
motivate
this
amount
would
be
to
also
make
the
reward
work,
rewards
working
group
smaller
at
the
Dallas
models,
so
we'd
actually
decrease
the
amount
that
flows
out
there
and
actually,
and
then
this
is
what
what.
What
in
in
essence
will
happen
that
we
will
take
responsibilities
for
from
the
people
that
used
to
be
in
the
working
group
that
are
no
longer
engaged
and
and
replacing
them
on
your
shoulder.
C
A
A
A
C
A
But
I
want
to
recognize
that,
like
like
nugget
and
Christopher
and
Olivia,
like
you,
guys
all
do
and
to
some
extent
like
up-and-comers
like
like
wrecks
and
and
z-way
who
I
think
is
gone
essentially
but
like
like.
Do
you
guys
want
to
get
paid
like?
How
do
you
want
to?
How
do
you
want
to
set
this
up
because
you're
doing
work
too?
It's
just
like.
You
know
that
little
three
percent
that
we
kick
ourselves
from
each
distribution
like
do
you
want
more
like
do?
We
need
to
change
things.
C
I
I
think
it's
reasonable
that
the
person
taking
on
the
sort
of
the
the
brunt
of
the
responsibility
is
the
one
that
definitely
gets
paid
most
I.
A
C
A
B
A
B
I
mean
I'm
I'm
doing
it
I'm
happy
to
continue
doing
it.
If
we
get
the,
we
make
the
rewards
board
smaller
and
everybody
gets
a
bit
more.
It's
okay,
but
I'm
doing
it
on
on
the
on
GM
time,
basically
so
I'm
already
getting
paid
for
that.
If
the,
if
now,
praise
is
going
to
completely
move
into
something
separate
and
all
my
development
time
for
that
is
going
to
be
there
I
don't
know.
Maybe
we
can.
We
can
talk
about
something
but
I.
B
A
C
But
maybe
we
should
make
a
a
proposal
to
remodel
the
the
working
group
slightly
and
and
sort
of
attach
that
not
not
attach
that
but
reference
that
for
you,
so
they
reference
each
other.
Those
two
proposals
and
so
modify.
A
A
B
A
C
A
A
Recently
and
Libby,
you
know
I'm
sure
she
still
wants
to
be
involved,
but
I'm,
just
like
I'm
looking
at
chewy
and
Vivi
and
like
they
seem
to
be
busy
with
other
things.
So
like
I,
don't
know,
I
want
to
check
in
with
him
and
if
they
don't
respond,
then
I
mean
that's
a
pretty
good
indicator.
C
A
Oh
okay,
cool
anything
else
on
these
two
topics.
A
A
So
there's
a
few
people
getting.
B
A
A
C
But
basically
the
the
thing
we
can
do
is
to
to
make
new
exports
for
all
all
periods
that
we
would
like
to
distribute
this
way
and
compare
to
to
the
old
data
file,
and
we
will
see
the
the
differences
all
all
newly
activated
users
and
that
now
have
ethereum
addresses
and
didn't
have
now.
Please
distribute
those.
C
So
but
we
need
to
come
up
with
this
structure
that
makes
this
manageable,
because
I
I
think
I
proposed
sometime
that
for
each
each
period
we
should
make
like
two
consecutive
follow-up
payouts.
C
You
know
three
months
later
or
something
like
that,
and
that
sounds
to
me
like
a
huge
headache
to
do
to
pay
out
each
period
three
times
and
remember
all
those
payout
payouts.
Maybe
we
can
simplify
the
structure
somehow
like
we,
we
do
we
do
it
two
times
a
year.
C
A
B
B
A
C
A
Yeah
but
I
had
something
else
set
up
already.
Maybe
it
was
token
allocations
yeah.
Here
we
go
so
yeah
here
we
are
so
basically
we
just
put
a
filter
on
this
column.
Here.
A
And
then
we
know
that
we
knew
we
owe
this
person
this
much
from
each
round.
C
A
C
Yeah,
it
would
include
exactly
the
same
people
in
the
exactly
the
same
order
if
we
run
the
exactly
the
same
export
and
the
only
thing
that
would
be
be
different.
This
time
would
be
that
some
of
the
addresses
or
some
of
the
the
receivers
now
have
addresses,
which
would
in
in
theory
at
least
mean
that
you
could
just
add
a
column
next
to
the
the
old
address
column
and
copy
paste,
the
new
address
column
next
to
the
old
one,
and
so
and
and
then
you
can
filter
those
two
together
to
see.
C
C
C
A
C
Okay,
because
we
would
like
to
do
it
in
in
like
one
big
distribution
right,
so
basically
we
would
take.
We
would
do
to
take
all
the
or
all
the
all
the
distributions
and
pack
them
together
somehow
and
then
run
new
distributions
for
all
periods
and
and
compare
that
to
all
the
old
data
and
find
the
difference
and
and
make
a
yeah
I.
A
A
C
B
C
Year
in
in
September,
we'll
do
the
same
thing
for
for
yeah,
from
July
22
to
July
23.
Basically,.
A
C
And
it's
not
important,
that
is,
it
is
the
same
date
every
year.
It's
basically
only
you
know
we
we
will
follow
the
the
period
dates
as
long
as
there's
no
period
is
left
out.
It's
it's
all
good.
A
Cool
any
other
questions
about
this.
C
B
A
A
Anything
else
anyone
wanted
to
talk
about
before
this
last
topic,
this
one's
a
little
bit
more
ethereal.
So
if
there's
anything
else,
important.
A
A
A
Okay,
anything
else.
A
Cool
this
last
topic
here,
I
kind
of
jumped
into
it
a
little
bit
before
going
on
vacation,
but
like
I,
just
didn't
really
have
the
space
to
do
anything
with
it
so
nobody's
coming
to
the
review.
Calls
basically-
and
you
know,
they're
kind
of
redundant
and
maybe
a
little
bit
boring.
So
how
can
we
get
more
engagement
in
there
and
I
think
we're
kind
of
making
it
into
the
idea
that
it
could
be
like
a
more
data
science
focused.
A
A
B
A
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
any
particular
hype
around
it,
but
I
I
do
see
a
gap
between
kind
of
the
a
lot
of
soft
skills
in
the
doctor
generating
Commons
and
a
lot
of
hard
skills
like
data
science
in
the
tea
and
I.
Think
it's
a
good
way
to
like
maybe
get
people
get
more
action
in
between
the
two.
A
A
So
I
don't
know
what
format
that's
going
to
look
like.
I,
don't
really
know
like
how
to
fully
execute
it
yet,
but
I'm
like
basically,
the
point
is
to
the
purpose
is
to
drive
more
interest
in
the
Quant
review
call
so
whether
that
is
focused
on
transparency
in
the
community
itself,
or
maybe
it's
a
different
angle,
that's
more
of
just
like
data
science
and
and
building.
C
Yeah
I
have
a
sense
that
a
lot
more
insight
can
be
squeezed
out
of
the
phrase
data
and
we're
currently
doing
yeah.
B
C
We
if
we
have
a
appraised
volume
that
is
big
enough
large
enough
compared
to
the
community
sites,
I,
don't
know
if
people
aren't
praising
each
other,
then
of
course
the
the
signal
is
weak.
A
And
I
mean
this-
is
this
is
a
perfect
use
case
for
this
modular
rad
that
we're
that
you
guys
are
building
it's
like.
We
have
actual
data.
We
have
this,
this
working
rad
thing
and
you
know
just
kind
of
letting
people
loose
on
it
and
like
maybe
finding
more
ways
that,
like
red,
can
be
useful
for
other
communities
by
using
the
Tec
is
like
a
a
testing
ground.
C
Yeah
yeah,
that
is
how
I
really
have
an
envisioned
this
modular
version
of
red,
that
we
have
this.
This
library
of
components
like
an
an
open
source
library
of
components
and
that
that's
and
anyone
can
can
add
to
it.
Like
a
bunch
of
token
engineering
students
just
go,
go
crazy
at
the
data
developing
20
new
analysis,
components,
analysing
the
data
from
various
angles
and
adding
those
components
to
the
library
for
and
then
for
for
any
Community
to
to
use
going
forward.
A
Cool
well
I
think.
The
next
step
for
me
is
like
maybe
touching,
base
with
Angela
or
Patty
and
like
seeing
what
works
for
them
because
really
like
I
We're,
not
gonna,
find
like.
We
have
a
few
data
scientists,
but
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
the.
The
action
is
happening
over
there
and
seeing
like
when
format
makes
sense
for
them.
C
Yeah
I
I
know
We
Will
We
Will
present
the
the
new
a
modular
rad
set
up
for
for
them
for
for
talking
engineering
people
once
it's
done
of
course,
and
when
they
see
it
when
they,
when
they
see
the
presentation
and
they
see
like
oh,
this
is
like
a
toolkit.
We
can
use
to
analyze
Place
data
to
begin
with,
and
then
they
will
become
super
excited
and
I
want
to
do
it
basically.
C
To
really
dig
in
and
look
deeper
at
the
work
you
have
been
doing
and
and
I
was
going
to
suggest,
let's
push
this
a
bit.
If
you
have
capacity
and
try
to
finish
the
current
new
version
that
you're
working
on
so
that
we
can
start
using
it
and
I
have
an
idea
on
how
we
can
how
we
would
allow
make
it
easy
for
for
users
to
run
it
or
yeah
cool.
B
A
Cool
well,
this
was
really
great
anything
else
to
add
to
the
Quant
review,
call
overhaul.
A
Okay,
anything
else
you
guys
wanted
to
mention
in
this
meeting.
C
I
mean
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
do
some,
some
Quant
review
in
like
the
community,
the
weekly
meetings
instead
like
taking
the
top
10
contributions
or
something
and
presenting
them
at
the
community
meeting.
You
know
bringing
some
of
this
analysis
into
the
into
the
to
the
open
by
talking
about
these,
like
these
were
the
main
contributions
the
last
week
or
something.
C
A
B
A
A
So
yeah
I'm
gonna,
try
and
figure
out
how
to
convert
this
on
the
ABC.
If
I
figure
it
out,
I'm
just
gonna,
do
it
and
and
make
the
vote
and
then
we'll
see
what
happens.
A
And
then
the
rewards
catch
up,
you're.
B
A
A
B
Reward
voice,
just
just
to
be
sure,
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
make
one
a
big
round.
Okay,
so
I'm
not
gonna,
save
it
in
three
different
rounds,
but
using
one
extra
like
or
do
you
prefer
to
have
like
one
16,
17
18
as
a
separate
route
for
the
archive
and
then
just
one
distribution
make
probably
that's
best
right.
Yeah
yeah.
A
And
then
the
housekeeping
thing
I
guess
we'll
follow
up
and
I'm
gonna
probably
give
these
guys
give
them
a
week
to
respond.
A
And
then
like
this
will
all
be
in
the
chat.
So
if
there's
any
pushback,
then
we'll
deal
with
it.
A
C
A
A
Cool
well,
then,
I'll
probably
go
ahead
and
still
in
the
next
couple
of
days,
Distributing
missed,
rewards
Christopher's,
going
to
take
a
stab
at
this
and
likely
we
will
all
be
involved
in
putting
this
final
CSV
together.
C
C
They
won't
be
able
to
you
to
use.
You
know
rad
as
intended
as
this
tool
where
they
can.
C
Of
course
they
can
use
the
current
version
of
rad
still
so
you
can
I
guess
you
can
soften
soften
up
Angela
a
little
bit,
but
still
talking
about
stop
talking
about
what's
in
common,
but
maybe
we
should
wait.
Okay,.
C
C
A
C
B
Probably
should
at
least
I
mean
maybe
I
don't
need
to
be
in
it
right
now,
but
once
the
details
start
getting
in
I
probably
would
want
to
be
involved
in
some
way
just
to
know.
What's
coming,
okay,
well,.
A
We'll
just
be
mindful
of
that
and
then
I'll
just
keep
I'll
just
try
and
add
some
fun
information
into
the
next
Community
call
from
the
rewards
data.
B
B
A
It's
awesome:
okay
and
we'll
do
this
again
next
week,
I
suppose.