►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
It
isn't
the
bug,
it's
just
that
the
commands
don't
get
registered.
Sorry
the
settings
don't
get
registered,
so
the
it
it
doesn't
get
added
to
the
database
so,
like.
I
think
it's
just
like
a
note
for
developers.
A
Just
like
a
comment,
they're
saying
that
the
setting
values
can't
be
empty
and
I
think
maybe
that
should
also
be
something
that
we
tell
the
users
that
if
they
leave
so
up
a
call
like
whenever
they're
filling
the
form
for
the
settings
if
they
leave
a
column
empty,
I
don't
know
if
that's
validated.
Maybe
it's
well.
B
Yeah-
okay-
let's
we'll
get
back
to
to
that.
Let's
get
get
started.
Welcome
to
the
rewards
working
group
meeting
the
weekly
march
2nd-
and
we
have
some
stuff
on
the
agenda
today
so
except
for
regular
status
updates.
B
I'd
say
the
main
talking
points
are
the
upcoming
first
quant
certification
and
also
source
cred.
I
think
we
should
talk
about
the
second
params
session
that
we
had
the
other
day.
So
I
really
hope,
let's
see
if
I
could,
it
would
be
great
if
matteo
or
auntie
or
both
could.
C
You
can
right
click
on
the
reward
system,
chat
and
it
says
invite
people.
B
C
C
I
I'm
still
testing
that
and
will
poor
soon
right
now,
I'm
I'm
fixing
small
bugs
that
we
have
warnings,
errors
and
stuff
like
that,
that
we
have
linking
warnings
and
errors.
B
Yeah
to
add
some
context
about
the
export
thing
we
not
realized
when
taking
the
the
export
I
made
and
pushing
it
into
the
the
rad
dashboard
that
some
additional
fields
were
needed
to
do
a
proper
analysis.
So
we
are,
we
are
adding
those
fields
to
the
export,
yeah
and
sanitization
is
about
making
sure
that
the
inputs
that
come
into
the
the
back
end
are.
B
B
Thank
you,
matt.
C
Hey,
I
did
a
few
that
I
did
like
two
tickets
to
just
kind
of
improve
the
performance
of
two
of
those
big
queries.
And
then
I
just
did
a
few
minor
like
cleaning
tickets,
and
my
next
one
is
improving
the
distribution
of
quantifiers
assignments.
B
B
So
now
the
the
the
user
interface
feels
snappy
again
when
you
reload
the
praise
page
or
that
that
doesn't
isn't
affected,
but
yeah
opening
a
period
like
this
just
takes
a
second
or
two
instead
of
like
10
seconds.
A
I've
been
doing
some
q
a
on
the
board
just
to
ensure
that
it's
it's
good
to
go.
I
found
some
small
bugs
and
fix
them,
mostly.
It
was
like
with
the
messages
right
now.
I've
been
working
on
the
settings
today
and
I
think
I
should
be
done
in
a
day
so
yeah,
so
we're
essentially
separating
the
messages
sent
out
by
the
bots.
A
Previously
they
used
to
be
hard-coded.
Now
we're
going
to
have
that.
I
have
those
in
the
settings
that
are
shown
to
the
admin
admin
in
shown
in
the
admin
panel
and
yeah
I'll,
probably
work
that
mostly
on
that
and
I
think
christopher
deployed
the
play
spot
on
the
on
on
production
inside
this
current
server.
The
actual
dc
server-
and
it
looks
like
it's
working,
fine,
just
great
and
another
small
minor
update
is
that
we
made
a
team
for
bots
on
discord.
A
So
if
anyone's
working
on
production
explicitly
working
on
production,
then
they
can
maybe
reach
out,
and
I
can
give
them
access
to
the
team.
A
B
So,
let's,
let's
demo
it
and
now
it's
and-
and
we
are
fast
approaching
the
the
point
in
time
where
we
actually
could
switch
and
start
using
the
the
new
bot.
So
let's
let
it
run
for
a
week
or
two
and
and
maybe
we
should
move
over
to
the
to
the
real
production
server.
First,
even
though
this
server
is
running
stably
that
the
testing
server
we
have
been
using
but
yeah,
I
guess
the
bot
is
mostly
good
good
to
go
and
and
ready
for
for
launch.
So
do
you
see
my
screen
now.
B
Yeah
nice,
so
I
have
installed
the
bot.
The
bot
is
live
on
the
tec
server,
but
I
will
let's,
let's
not
use
it
yet
in
in
the
open
channels,
at
least.
B
A
B
A
If
no
one
else
has
the
role
like
we
can
have
that
role,
maybe
the
quantifiers
role
would
work
for
this
purpose,
so
only
the
quantifiers
would
be
able
to
use
the
bot
and
no
one
else,
and
then,
whenever
we're
switching
over,
we
can
change
that
setting
sounds.
B
Like
a
good
idea,
so
here
is
the
the
the
the
brace
dashboard.
B
Reloading
the
page
now
nothing
there,
nothing
new
and
sending
a
place
here
to
myself.
B
B
My
avatar
disappeared:
wherever
did
you
notice
that
I
had?
I
had
the
avatar
before
I
praised
and
now
it's
gone
so
perhaps
the
the
avatar
id
doesn't
upload.
C
B
About
praise
front
and
back
and
and
bots,
perhaps
not-
we
are
fixing
mostly
like
stability
issues.
So
so
the
system
is
like,
I
said
it's
running,
stably
and
and
is
mostly
ready
for
production,
but
the
the
general
plan
is
to
use
this
week
as
the
the
week
of
release.
We
are,
we
will
merge
the
current
the
current
development
branch
into
the
main
branch,
so
we're
doing
some
cleaning
up
and
documentation
and
that
kind
of
stuff
as
well,
and
we
will
name
this
version.
The
0.0.1
alpha
version.
B
D
B
D
Great
so
then
yeah
right
after
this
call
we'll
just
make
sure
all
the
quantifiers
get
signed
up
in
appraised
dashboard,
and
then
we
can
open
up
a
new
quant
for
monday.
B
B
Yeah
I
created
a
period
all
the
place.
Data
is
already
imported,
so
I
created
a
period
that
runs
only
for
for
only
two
weeks,
more
or
less
to
end
of
the
end
of
july,
and
my
thought
was
that
it
might
be
good
to
do
a
warm
up.
D
B
And
not
not
like
yeah,
it's
a
little
bit
like
an
additional
practice
run,
but
now
we'll
do
it
for
real
and
it
would
be
different
than
the
previous.
B
And
we
have
people
like
tam
saying,
like
you
know
she
could
do
a
quarter
at
a
time.
You
know
just
let's
get
it
over
with,
but
I
think
she
is
the
exception.
I
don't
think
we
would
want
to
do
quants
where
we
place.
You
know
a
thousand
praise
to
be
quantified
on
each
quantifier.
C
I
also
wouldn't
mind
I
spent
like,
with
you
know
a
saturday
eight
hours
quantificating
just
to
get
in
yeah,
supporting
town
and
getting.
C
So
much
get
the
praise
you
know
in
day,
so
yeah.
B
That
is
the
signal.
That
is
what
tom
told
me
as
well
that
that
she
also
sees
from
different
sources
that
that
it
no,
it
would
be
really
a
good
idea
to
have
get
it
up
and
running
soon.
D
B
No,
no!
No!
No!
It
won't,
because
that
that
won't
mean
a
an
upgrade
of
the
system
or
anything
like
we
have
done
now.
Now
the
the
the
upgrade
we
made
was
quite
a
major
one,
because
it's
we
have
yeah.
It
was
a
major
one
and
when
moving
from
from
this
server
to
the
other
server
that
it's
just
an
export
and
import
into
the
database,
it's
a
completely
exact
the
same
setup.
D
All
right:
well
then,
that
seems
pretty
clear
to
me,
like
probably
during
or
right
after
this
call
we'll
make
a
call
to
quantifiers
to
activate
and
then
we'll
create
a
period
and
then
we'll
open
it
for
quantification.
On
monday.
B
D
B
Yeah
yeah
and
the
question
I
posted
the
question
to
you
just
before
the
meeting.
If
we
I
could
make
an
import
script
that
exports
and
imports
from
the
old
database,
the
the
users
and
that
they're
activated
accounts.
It's
like
you
know,
but
it's
also
only
you.
You
have
to
design
the
sign
with
your
message
to
activate
again.
So
do
you
think
it's
worth
wait
waiting
for
me
doing
that
script
or.
B
All
users,
now,
when
you
go
to
the
quantify
pool,
this
list
is
empty
because
I
had
had
to
clean
out
the
database,
and
you
know
the
the
the
quantifiers
that
were
part
of
the
the
test
quant
they
had
already
registered
and
activated
their
accounts.
B
B
Before
you
wake
up,
or
we
tell
the
the
quantifiers,
you
just
have
to
activate
again.
D
B
Even
if
you
no,
these
were
people
that
logged
in
afterwards,
like
36
users
and
and
maybe
20
of
them
had
activated
and,
and
you
know,
connected
discord
and
their
console.
D
Okay,
well
then,
let's
let's
wait,
then
we'll
wait
until
then
that
that's
imported.
B
And
maybe
we
should
move
jump
right
ahead
to
the
source
spread
and
the
the
second
params
session.
Now
auntie
is
here
and
he
was
joined
that
session
and
I
think
we
ended
up
in
some
sort
of
conclusion
about
the
source,
credit,
params
or
andy.
What
what
would
you
say
and
then
again
over
there
as
well.
C
Hey
yeah,
so
ben
said
that.
C
What
it
was
like
he
said,
first
of
all
that
he
pretty
much
recommends
the
default
parameters,
but
he
said
like
it
looked
like
we,
like,
you,
guys,
put
a
lot
of
thought
into
the
parameters
and
that
those
could
work
really
well,
but
due
to
the
algorithm,
it's
a
bit
unpredictable,
the
results
of
of
like
you
may
change
up
a
bit
of
a
parameter,
and
you
can
you
know
it.
It
is
not
as
predictable
the
outcome
it
will
have
yeah.
C
C
But
but
yeah
like
like
auntie,
just
said
it.
He
said
it
was
pretty
convoluted
how
every
parameter
worked
out
in
the
end,
so
you
couldn't
just
one
to
one
control
how
the
stuff
would
look
like,
but
we
should
definitely
try
it
out
and
just
compare
with
the
default
to
see
if
yeah,
how,
how
how
it
looked
and
how
it
changed.
The
results.
B
He
described
the
source
cred
algorithm
as
sort
of
a
black
box
using
this
page
page
rank
algorithm,
and
so,
like
you
said,
it's
not
entirely
obvious.
But
what
happens
when
you
pull
the
lever
or
you
can
see
the
results
much
some
sometime
in
the
future
and
but
but
I
I
asked
him
the
quite
clear
question
to
to
have.
B
You
know,
look
at
the
at
the
settings
you
see
on
on
this
page
and
tell
us
if,
if
something
strikes
your
eye
as
being
you
know
totally
off
or
weird
or
this,
you
need
to
change,
and
he
it
didn't
say
any
any.
It
didn't
find
any
any
parameters
that
he
thought
needed
changing
and,
like
you
said,
instead,
he
seemed
excited
to
see
how
these
parameters
play
out.
B
To
begin
with
clean
out
the
current
source,
cred
instance,
so
that
the
the
the
old
grain
distributions
are
not
there
anymore
and
and
then
we
need
to
to
say
to
set
this
the
new
settings
and
then
we
need
to
set
a
first
date
for
a
grain
distribution.
B
So
my
proposal
would
be
that
we,
unless
we
we
feel
confident
that
we
can
come
up
with
better
settings.
And
now
we
have
spoken
to
one
of
the
core
guys
of
source
cred
and
unless
we
feel
confident
that
we
can
come
up
with
something
better
than
what
we
see
on
the
screen.
B
My
proposal
would
be
that
we
we
start
off
with
these
settings
and
and
set
like
the
25th
of
july
or
something
as
the
first
grain
distribution
date.
And
then
grain
distributions
will
be
made
weekly
on
sundays
every
sunday
automatically,
which
means
that
we
can
in
every
phrase
period
we
can
include
two
source
credit
grain
distributions,
or
maybe
we
can
configure
it
to
run
bi-weekly.
B
But
that
puts
more
pressure
on
us
to
also
do
the
praise
periods
on
this
same
same
interval.
I
I'm
not
sure
if
you
can
can
or
should
change
the
the
interval
when
grain
distributions
are
made
once
you
have
set
it
up.
I
guess
it's
more
better
to
just
let
it
run
on
that
scale
on
those
settings
so
letting
it
run
weekly.
Then
we
are
free
to
do
praise
periods
in
whichever
way
we
like,
and
then
we
just
if
we
need
to.
We
combine
several
grain
distributions
into
one.
C
B
And
one
thing
to
keep
in
mind
is
that
you
cannot
set
a
starting
date
for
for
when
source
credit
begins
tracking
contributions,
which
means
that
if
we
set
the
25th
of
july
the
sunday
as
the
the
first,
the
first
grain
distribution,
that
distribution
will
cover
all
contributions
ever
made
up
until
that
date.
From
where
from
when
we
first
started,
using
the
discord
server
and
from
when
we
first
started.
C
C
B
I
don't
know
how
that
works
if
we,
if
we
set
the
the
the
date
for
the
first
screen
distribution
way
back
in
the
in
the
past,
when
are
the
all
the
grain
distributions
between
july
25th
and
and
current
date?
When
are
those
made?
Do
we
make
those
manually
one
by
one,
just
pressing
a
button?
B
B
But
that
means
that
we
we
should
do
one
after
the
first
distribution.
We
should
really
look
at
the
settings
and
for
the
first
few,
distributions
really
really
look
at
the
settings
and
adapt
if
something
seems
off,
because
in
between
every
distribution,
we
can
of
course,
change
the
settings
and
hope
to
affect
the
the
outcome
and,
and
he
seemed
uncertain
if
it
yeah.
C
B
But
it
feels
at
least
like
we
have
a
general
direction
for
the
source,
cred
implementation
and
setup
and
and
something
to
try
out
and
get
started
with,
and
that
feels
good
and
and
and
according
to
mateo.
He
could
have
it
up
and
running
by
by
monday,
which
means
that
in
in
the
best
of
worlds
and
where
everything
goes
smooth
and
as
expected,
then
then
we
can
include
that
grain
distribution
in
this
first
phrase
period,
quantification,.
C
I
know
I
kind
of
mentioned
these
like
pretty
much
in
every
meeting,
but
I'm
really
interesting
to
I'm
really
interested
to
know
like
what
policies
for
the
rewards
be
or
who
makes
the
decisions
in
case
something
happens.
For
example,
I
don't
know
what
what's
considered
gaming,
what's
not
what's
to
be
invented,
instant
device,
the
community.
D
Well,
I
mean
the
short
answer
is:
who
decides
if
the
system
is
being
gamed
or
not?
That's
going
to
be
done
by
the
the
quantifiers
themselves,
who's
looking
at
the
praise
data
and
then,
on
the
other
end
we're
going
to
have
the
reward
board
which
is
going
to
be
looking
at
the
whole
distribution,
and
I
mean
mostly,
everything
should
be
approved.
But
if
there's
like
some
sort
of
gross
gamification
like
there
is
that
last
backstop
there,
where
a
distribution
could
be
rejected.
C
Yeah
yeah,
can
you
repeat
it
this
again,
you
mentioned
so
different.
The
praise
is
like
the
process
for
this
day
system.
Taking
your.
C
D
Yeah,
so
that
that,
like
that
whole
gamification
talk
like
usually,
I
expect
the
reward
board
is
going
to
be
the
final
backstop
for
anything
like
weird
from
going
out.
But
we're
also
going
to
be
having
like
a
a
community
review
process
where,
like
the
distributions,
are
going
to
be
posted
and
then
people
can
see
like
there's
any
anomalies
or
anything
and
like
we're
going
to
have
like
an
iteration
process
to
catch.
Any
of
these
weird
things.
B
Of
course,
you
can
sort
of
praise
contribution,
contributions
that
have
never
been
made,
and
but
if,
if
we
have
a
pool
of
quantifiers
that
are
knowledgeable
about
what
goes
on
in
the
community
and
have
a
rough
sense
of
who
does
what
that,
then,
I
guess
and
any
attempts
of
of
sort
of
gave
me
gamifying
and
the
the
actual
price
data
could
be
spotted
quite
easily,
and
that
is
my
my
hope
at
least,
and
then,
of
course,
there
is
the
sense
of
the
gamification
of
you
know.
B
B
But
my
hopes
are
that
the
solid
practices
and
culture
will
build
over
time.
That
makes
gaming
the
system
quite
difficult.
B
D
I
mean:
did
anybody
take
this
on
because
I
know
like
there
was
a
lot
of
problems
we
were
having
with
the
rules
of
praise
document
and
just
like
it
needs
a
facelift
to
reflect
everything
we
found
out.
So
that's
like
somebody
that
we
would
need
to
like
incorporate
all
this
data
and
make
a
more
comprehensive
forum
post.
B
And
nate
you,
you
expressed
some
some
interest
or
are
you
to
maybe
perhaps
write
something.
E
Yeah,
currently,
I'm
doing
for
trying
to
write
the
script
for
the
praise,
quantification
and
then
doing
some
documentation
around
the
reward
system.
So,
if
there's
anything
that
specifically
needs
to
get
done
quickly,
just
let
me
know-
and
I
can
get
that
written
up
for
you.
D
E
I
think
I've
gotten
the
the
gist
of
everything
that's
been
written.
I
think
the
only
thing
is
the
conversation
that
krista
fear
and
I
had
before
about
whether
we
want
to
explicitly
state
document
what
is
being
rewarded
through
source
cred
to
avoid
any
type
of
gamification,
or
we
should
keep
it
vague
to
avoid
that
type
of
situation.
E
So
I
think
that's
the
big.
The
only
concern
that
I
have
with
it
but
christopher,
like
you,
said
before
you
know,
if
we
can't
handle
the
truth,
then
then
why
bother
so
yeah?
That's
just
my
thoughts.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
has
any
dissenting
opinions
around
that,
but
yeah.
B
I
know
that
we
have
one
thing
came
up
during
the
test
quants,
and
that
was
the
the
need
or
that
or
that
it
would
be
good
to
have
some
sort
of
help
text
readily
accessible
when
quantifying
like
these
are
things
to
keep
in
mind
when
quantifying
not
like
guidelines,
how
to
what
score
to
give
certain
contributions,
but
more
like
this
is
how
you
do
it
the
quantification,
but
maybe
that
is
so.
We
we
haven't
implemented
that
I
said
that
we
might
implement
that
before
the
first
quant,
some
sort
of
maybe
a
small.
E
What
would
that
would
that
include
the
duplication
of
phrases
like
do
you
want
people
to
be
informed
about
that
situation?.
B
Yeah,
that
would
be
a
typical
thing
to
inform
about
to
remind
people
that
dupli.
What
is
a
duplicate
praise?
How
is
a
duplicate
praise,
valued,
for
instance,
that
it
gets
a
percentage
of
the
original
value
original
price
value?
Okay,
but.
E
Yeah
in
terms
of
educating
the
appraised
quant
people,
the
the
the
goal
right
now
on
the
team
dial-
was
to
develop
that
animation,
video
for
it
I'm
sure,
and
that
was
just
one.
E
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
the
right
approach
that
we
want
to
take
in
terms
of
making
it
a
little
bit
more
simple
to
educate,
praise,
quant
quantifiers
on
the
process,
and,
if
that's
the
case,
you
do
want
it
more
focused
on
the
actual
context
of
each
praise
and
like
what
they
should
be
looking
for
or
just
explaining
how
it
works
from
a
you
know,
an
initial
state
perspective.
E
B
Maybe
I
think
that
that
is
not
not
even
a
free
form
text
is
more
more
like
a
number
of
bullet
points,
so
maybe
we
can
nail
that
down
ourselves
to
begin
with
at
least
okay.
E
Yeah
and
yeah
I
I
can
get
most
of
the
information
I
think
from
between
the
forum
post
and
the
documentation
that
you
already
have.
I
can
put
together
something
reference
document
for
people
who
are
praise
quantifier.
B
So
it
would,
that
would
be
the
so
the
the
quantification
reference
like
this
is
how
how
it
works
to
to
quantify
just
a
bunch
of
small
number
of
bullet
points
and.
B
D
So
I
do
like
a
live
quantification
session
like
we
can
like
we'll
do
the
first
quant
we'll
have
like
something
where
people
can
join
in
and
answer
questions.
B
D
Yeah,
I
think
that
was
really
valuable,
the
one
that
we
did
during
the
test,
clients
and
the
fact
that
it
was
recorded,
I
think,
provided
a
lot
of
value
for
people
who
are
coming
in
to
try
and
understand
what
they're
supposed
to
do
so.
Definitely
next
week,
probably
early
next
week,
we
can
try
and
set
something
up
where
whoever's
able
to
join
can
join.
And
then
we
can
answer
questions
and
do
some
quantification
together.
B
Cool,
I
haven't
taken
any
notes
as
usual
and
but
I
will
look
at
the
recording
and
and
because
now
it
feels
like
we
have
made
a
few
decisions
and
planned
some
stuff
about
source,
cred
and
etc.
B
I'm,
at
least
it
is,
I
am
excited
about
doing
the
first
first
week
soon.
A
B
Has
been
a
long
time
coming
and
I'm
happy
that
we
have
the
the
system
is
online
now
and
feels
snappy
and,
and
it
looks
okay
and.
B
Okay,
so
unless
we
have
any
other
issues
to
to
bring
up,
then
we
will
cut
this
meeting
short
for
15
minutes
and
and
let
everyone
get
back
to
whatever
they
were
doing
before.