►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Agenda
01:09 - Sourcecred bots
09:20 - Praise Back end
10:16 - Praise Front end
10:45 - Allocation distribution
25:40 - Identity management
29:29 - Rewards Board
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Welcome
again
to
this
reward
system-
sync
I'd
say
we
are
roughly
or
we
were
a
little
bit
past
the
half
time
with
the
the
compared
to
our
initial
plan
of
being
ready
by
the
end
of
november
and
the
general
general
feeling
is
that
we
are
roughly
on
track.
We
are
somewhat
behind
schedule
on
the
coding
I'd
say,
but
not
much.
I
think
we
can
pick
it
up
and
and
deliver
hopefully
on
time
and
yeah.
A
So
just
let's
jump
right
into
the
the
weekly
that
the
status
updates
and
sure
I
guess
we
have
around
five
minutes
per
per
work
stream,
because
then
we
have
reserved
30
minutes.
The
other
half
of
the
meeting
to
the
rewards
committee
to
be
able
to
have
a
little
bit
deeper
discussion
about
that.
B
Error
so
last
week
I
didn't
really
work
on
anything
because
I
was
gone
street
third
to
fifth.
This
week
I
did
work
on
polishing
some
details
for
the
meeting
track
report
and
specifically
flash
commands,
I'm
actually
looking
into
tracking
the
duration.
Someone
stays
in
the
call,
instead
of
what
it,
what
the
what
usually
attracts.
So
that's
something
that's
gonna
change,
maybe
tomorrow
or
some
somewhere
around
that
that
should
be
done,
and
we
should
have
a
deployable
version
of
this
launch.
B
I
did
sync
with
christopher
and
we
discussed
what's
a
good
way
to
move
forward
with
this,
instead
of
like
having
a
a
channel
where
we
log
everyone
having
calls
and
then
having
source
code
run
through
it,
another
approach
might
be
like
making
a
source
great
plugin
and
entering
the
data
in
directly
inside
source
grid,
because,
as
far
as
I
know,
the
meaning
behind
tracking
credit
for
joining
meetings
was
to
keep.
It
is
to
not
keep
it
subjective.
It
had
to
be
link
object.
B
It
just
had
to
be
like
super
specific,
like
one
great
perk
or
something
similar
to
that,
instead
of
like
keeping
it
open-ended,
that
people
react
with
emojis.
In
in
like
a
in
in
the
channel
in
the
like,
it
doesn't
subscribe,
and
then
we
measure
that
data,
because
that
might
like
value
the
data
like
meetings
that
have
more
attendees
would
have
more
greater,
similarly
that
it's
issues
might
arise.
So
that's
something
we
can
maybe
discuss
today
and
christopher
shared
something
that
might
make
us
not
need
the
twitter
integration.
B
That
is
like
there's
something
that
is
being
worked
on
called
idx.
So
I
I
looked.
I
just
read
up
about
it,
so
it
looks
interesting.
I'm
not
sure
when
we'll
have
like
a
deployable
version
that
integrates
with
source
grid
and
that's
pretty
much
it.
A
Yeah,
and-
and
the
big
thing
here
is,
is
I
I
think
is
it
worth
investigating
or
or
I'd
say
it
is
worth
in
investigating
if,
if
it
could
be
possible
to
write
a
source
cred
plug-in
instead
of
routing
the
data
through
discord?
Because
writing
the
data
through
discord
is
sort
of
a
really
hacky
solution
and
also
it
invites
for.
A
Community
reactions,
which
we
don't
want
on
on
the
to
the
twitter
praise,
so
it
will
be
really
exciting
to
see
what
you
see
how
how
difficult
it
is
to
to
write
a
a
source,
cred
plugin,
basically.
A
But
if
someone
here
in
this
meeting
feels
strongly
that
we
should
be
posting
meeting
attendance
information
in
discord
for
for
some
other
reason
now,
maybe
it's
a
good
time
to
to
talk
about
that.
If
that
that
is
the
case,.
C
I
really
like
the
idea
of
not
posting
everyone's
personal
information
on
discord.
Let
me
just
say
that
I
love
the
idea
of
getting
idx
integrated
ceramic
is
by
definitely
the
future
of
identity
in
crypto.
It
feels
very,
I
feel,
pretty
confident
about
that.
The
right
people
are
doing
it
right.
People
aren't
engaged
with
it
and
they're
all
legit.
C
What
I
would
say
is
that
I
don't
want
I
you
know
an
mvp
version
doesn't
have
to
have
ceramic
going
in.
It
is
what
I
I
would
just
caution.
You
know
like
it's
still
like
you
know,
bleeding
edge
tech
and
there's
going
to
be
problems
that
everyone
runs
into.
So
I
wouldn't
I
I
would
try
to
avoid
having
it
in
the
scope
one
off,
but
man
if
we
can
avoid
people
posting
information
like
in
github
and
connecting
all
of
their
data
or
sorry
in
discord
in
channels
like
that.
That
would
be
fantastic.
D
A
Yeah
and
I'll
get
back
to
the
this,
actually,
the
identity
of
things
a
little
bit
further
down
as
well,
but
for
the
for
the
twitter
bot
is
there
anyone
opposing
that
that
we
investigate,
if
feeding
the
data
straight
into
source
credit
instead
of
routing
it
through
discord,.
E
A
A
E
Yeah,
I've
just
never
seen
so
it
would
be
taking
the
it
would
like
be,
it
would
be
taking
the
identities
of
the
people
who
are
posting
on
twitter
and
quantifying
them
based
on
emoji
reacts.
B
A
Routing
through
discord
also
adds
the
complexity
of
having
to
connect
discord
and
twitter
users,
which
is
would
be
a
messy
task
if
yeah,
so
I
I
think
everything
speaks
for
for,
except
for
the
the
possible
technical
implications
or
the
for
it
being.
You
know
complicated
of
writing
a
a
plugin
that
feeds
source
code
directly.
Everything
speaks
for
that
I'd,
say.
E
D
Question
on
the
couldn't
it
be
a
dm
that
requests
the
information,
so
people
join
discord.
There
is
a
message
they
receive
when
whenever
they
join
that,
if
they
want
to
sign
up
for
the
reward
system
so
to
be
rewarded
by
praising
source
cred,
they
need
to
submit
that
information
on
a
private
message.
So.
B
A
There's
also
an
additional
extra
layer
of
complexity
with
just
posting.
When
the
discord
information
is
posted
on
discord,
then
we
only
need
to
connect
the
discord
identity
with
the
the
source,
cred
identity.
And
but
when
you
post
on
on
on
twitter
and
then
feed
it
into
discord,
then
we
need
to
first
link
twitter
to
discord
and
discord
to
source
credit.
So
it
becomes
sort
of
a
chain
of
complex
things.
A
I
think
we
need
to
move
on
if
we
wouldn't
want
to
spend
the
second
half
hour
on
other
talks,
praise
back
end,
I'm
I'm
removing
a
noggin's
name
from
from
the
backend
backend
list.
So
so
now
there's
a
rudolph
doing
doing
only
the
the
back
end
development
and
I
have
a
short
statement
from
him
saying
that
he
plans
to
finish
this
week
with
the
creation
of
praise
from
various
sources.
So
the
actual
mechanism
of
feeding
praise
into
the
new
system,
the
mechanism
that
will
be
used
by
the
bots.
A
That
is
what
he
is
working
on
and
then
yeah
he's
also
looking
at
identity,
stuff
and
sort
of
basic
architectural
stuff.
So
that
is
his
short
status.
Update
and
there's
nothing
really
blocking
his
his
progress.
A
The
praise
front
end.
Let's
see
if
some
of
the
no
no
none
of
the
front-end
devs
are
here.
So
the
front-end
development
has
been
a
bit
slow.
The
last
week
we
have
two
new
front-end
developers
on
boarding
and
learning
the
code
base,
etc.
So
so
no
new
features
delivered
this
week,
but
we
hope
that
the
pace
we
will
pick
up
the
pace
the
coming
week
and
not
no
blockers
really
and
let's
move
on
and
hear
from
noggin
about
the
allocation
distribution
and
an
analysis,
work
stream.
F
Yeah,
so
we
had
our
office
okay
yeah,
so
we
had
our
first
meeting
today
to
kind
of
yeah
plan
out
everything
and
yeah.
The
the
main
thing
which
octopus
was
said
and
which
should
be
cleared,
is
that
we
need
a
pretty
like.
We
need
to
know
what
we
want
to
measure
in
a
way
like
we
can
take
all
this
data
and
put
it
together
and
do
a
lot
of
analysis.
But
we
want
to.
F
We
need
to
know
exactly
what
qualitative
information
we
want
to
distill
from
all
that
raw
data
that
we're
getting
in
because,
like
he
explained
it,
was
it's
going
to
four
steps.
The
first
one
is
qualitative,
which
is
the
normal
praise,
which
is
qualitative
in
nature,
which
then
gets
quantified
through
a
number
then
quantified
again
in
the
context
of
the
whole
data
set,
and
then
we
get
to
the
actual
sense
making,
which
is
all
again
qualitative
in
nature.
F
So
we
need
to
decide
on
on
a
specific
number
of
metrics,
which
he
said
should
be
like
four
to
six
graphs,
maybe
six
to
eight
numerical
numbers
in
it.
But
these
have
to
be
agreed
by
by
the
community.
We
can't
just
take
five,
we
want.
We
also.
We
saw
how
that
went.
So
we
how
do
so.
The
next
step
would
be
to
get
a
short
list
of
what
exactly
do.
F
So
yeah
I
was
thinking,
maybe
just
to
to
write
a
forum
post
and
have
the
whole
community
input,
maybe
ping
relevant
people
in
the
last
praise
situation,
but
yeah
I'd
be
very
happy
to
hear
feedback
from
you
guys.
What
do
you
think
is
the
is
the
best
way
to
kind
of
get
to
this
short
list,
which
we
can
then
implement.
F
E
A
F
F
Which
way
so
we
kind
of
can
find
the
metrics
which
help
us
evaluate
if
we
are
going
in
the
right
direction
or
not,
and
that
and
the
the
decision
about
which
metrics
we
want
to
to
track
and
want
to
show
cannot
be
decided
by
octopus,
ms
in
me,
so
it
has
to
be
something
which
comes
from
the
from
the
greater
community
and
and
as
such,
I
was
just
thinking
to
maybe
write
a
forum
post
and
ping,
the
people
of
which
were
very
in
the
praise
debate
very
present
there
and
and
that
stuff
to
kind
of
yeah
get
to
to
a
to
consensus
and
and
yeah,
and
that
was
it
and
I
think
olivia
you
wanted
to.
F
D
Yeah,
thank
you
so
much
for
repeating
that.
I
really
appreciate
it
so
there's
something
that
octopus
says
that
I
really
like.
He
says
that
when
a
metric
becomes
a
goal,
he
ceases
to
be
a
metric.
D
So
I
think
us
understanding
our
goals
should
be
should
come
before
the
matrix
and
the
matrix
should
be
like
a
reflection
of
the
contributions
that
exist
and
based
on
the
goal,
understanding
what
we're
trying
to
measure
so
we're
going
to
look
into
that
in
the
reward
system.
Research
group
for
the
tc,
as
well
so
we'll
be
coming
up
with
some
metrics,
based
on
the
on
the
data
analysis
of
like
what
could
be
good
metrics
for
the
types
of
contributions
that
we
have.
D
G
Just
some
questions,
maybe
nagin
from
distilling
that
information
and
and
what
kind
of
data
do
we
want
to
display?
Where
do
you
imagine
this
data
going
like?
Where
are
we
going
to
present
this
distilled
information.
A
Can
I
just
jump
in
and
do
a
short
recap
of
where
the
plan
plan
is
that
it
ends
up?
I
think
I
mentioned
it
last
time,
so
the
the
second
half
of
the
rewards
system
process
after
the
source
credit
has
calculated
a
distribution
and
after
the
price
system
after
we
have
done
the
quantification.
So
we
have
two
streams
of
raw
data
and
we
we
merge
them
together
into
a
into
a
jupiter
notebook,
most
likely
and
there
we
do
the
final
distribution
calculation
so
that
that's
what
I'm
showing
on
the
screen
right
now.
A
So
so
two
two
main
inputs,
one
one
screen
for
for
calculating
the
the
distribution,
the
final
distribution
of
those
two
merge,
much
streams
and,
and
then
one
one
notebook
for
for
analysis.
A
So
for
each
each
appraised
period
we
create
a
document
like
this
and
place
a
copy
in
in
on
a
github
in
a
github
folder
in
a
repository.
So
we
also
have
the
the
history
for
transparency.
You
can
move
back
and
see
how
what
did
the
analysis
show
like
two
periods
ago,
etc.
F
F
So,
okay,
speed
should
be
one
thing:
how
much
gas
we
have
is
another
one,
so
kind
of
yeah
agree
on
three
on
four
to
six
thing
things
we
want
to
show
and
and
that
we
we
can't
just
take
by
ourselves,
which
has
to
be
kind
of
a
consensus,
choice.
G
D
No,
that's
that's
exactly
that.
I
can
share
this.
That
is
something
we
were
discussing
yesterday,
just
to
exemplify
a
little
bit.
What
what
nagin
is
saying
so
understanding
what
types
of
metrics
we
want
to
have
so,
for
example,
here
he
uses
the
metaphor
of
a
city
like
measuring
cities,
happiness
and
then
maybe
with
the
tc
would
be
like
measuring
token
engineering
projects
that
were
successfully
funding
funded
or
like.
D
Are
we
advancing
the
field
of
token
engineering
and
then
the
rob
data
is
all
the
aggregates
of
the
praise
and
the
source
credit
that
we
get
and
then
some
of
the
the
metrics
for
the
raw
data,
like
the
simple
metrics
could
be.
I
don't
know
number
of
people
that
were
praised,
a
number
of
people
that
were
praised
with
the
highest
grade
that
we
have
in
the
scale
with
the
lowest
grade.
We
have
in
the
scale
types
of
contributions,
things
like
that
and
then,
when
you
go
to
the
complex
matrix,
then
it
gets
into
like.
D
Maybe
what
is
the
quality
of
the
contribution
that
was
more
highly
praised
and
and
then
it
starts
to
get
a
little
more
subjective?
D
G
D
I
think
it
can
be
post
mvp.
I
don't
know
how
complicated
it
is
to
build
the
ui,
but
just
thinking
of
like
why.
Why
did
you
put
up
for
the
praise
debates?
For
example,
there
was
three
metrics
that
we
were
using
and
the
graphs
coming
out
of
those
metrics
were
kind
of
like
built
up
at
the
moment
that
you
would
run
them
kind
of
like
the
dashboard
was
working.
D
A
And
since
this
is
a
thing
separate
from
from
the
praise,
the
praise
system,
the
the
the
the
jupiter
notebooks
is
more
more
like
a
standalone
docu,
just
a
bunch
of
documents,
and,
and
so
so
the
there
won't
be
that
much
ui
design.
It
will
look
like
basically
black
and
white
documents,
most
likely.
Unless
again
you
talked
about
making
them
really
fancy,
but
but
that
would
be
my
guess
that
it
looks
like
a
black
and
white
document,
with
some
charts,
basically
and
and
yeah.
A
A
To
tie
this
thing
together
and
sort
of
identify
next
actions
here,
because
it
sounds
to
me
that
that
the
the
research
group
are
planning
to
do
a
big
piece
of
the
work
of
identifying
what
what
to
measure
and
why
and
which
makes
the
this
whole
work
stream.
Maybe
shouldn't
focus
at
that
as
much
at
all
the
the.
Why
and
become
more
focusing
more
on
the
technical
sides
of
actually
putting
this
jupiter
notebook
together
and
crunching
the
data
and
producing
the
the
graphs.
F
Yeah
great
yeah,
I
think
we
can.
We
can
then
just
take
what
what
ygg
did
for
the
praise
as
a
kind
of
blueprint
of
what
we're
doing
right
now,
get
it
all
mounted
up
and
then
the
moment
the
reward
system
has
the
words
research
group
has
more,
has
some
some
other
stuff.
We
can
just
implement
it
post
mvp
and
for
the
start,
just
yeah
we
can.
We
can
do
that.
Definitely.
A
And
and
olivia,
do
you
think
there
is?
Do
you
think
that
that
is
doable,
that
you
could
you
and,
together
with
what
he
has
done
before,
could
produce
like
three
to
five
measures
that
we
know
that
we
will
need
from
from
the
beginning?
So
we
can
start
with
those.
A
A
Great
and
it's
worth
saying
also
that
that
it
will
be
totally
possible
to
to
go
back
to
a
an
old
notebook,
of
course,
opening
it
up
again,
adding
more
more
measurements
in
hindsight
so
sort
of
so
it's
not
just
because
we
have
finished
the
quant.
It
doesn't
mean
that
the
the
we
cannot
do
any
more
analysis
later
on.
A
But
I
think
that
sounds
like
like
a
a
plan.
So
so
you
you,
you
talk
to
each
other,
identify
a
few
metrics
and
then
focus
on
on
implementing
those
metrics
and
creating
the
actual
jupiter
notebook
so
so
that
we
have
it
working.
D
A
And
let
me
just
quickly
say
a
few
words
about
identity
management
before
we
move
into
the
awards
committee
talk
and
that
is
like
by
why
we
mentioned,
and
also
grief,
pointed
out
that
ceramic
is
doing
a
lot
of
work.
So
ceramic
is
not
a
blockchain
the
same
way
as
regular,
regular
blockchains,
but
more
of
a
peer-to-peer
data
storage
solution
with
some
blockchain
flavor
to
it.
A
Creating
the
the
possibility
for
for
many
projects
to
share
the
same
data
models,
and
in
this
case
we
can
many
projects
can
share
the
same
data
models
for
for
user
information,
and
we
identified
a
need
during
last
meeting.
I
think
it
was
that
we
realized
that
onboarding
will
be
a
hassle
of
when
we
want
to
onboard
new
members
to
for
them
to
be
able
to
receive,
rewards
from
both
source
credit
and
praise.
A
A
There
needs
to
be
some
some
kind
of
automation
and
either
we
do
something
ourselves
completely,
or
we
can
look
towards
the
one
hive
that
has
done
some
sort
of
semi-automated
stuff
or
we
could
look
to
what
sort
of
emerging
standard
solutions
there
are,
and
this
thing
that
ceramic
is
doing
called
idx
is
seems
to
be
one
one
of
those
sort
of
solutions
that
could
become
more
or
less
standardized,
and
the
good
thing
is
that
source
credit
is
working
on
implementing
this
idx
protocol
for
doing
sort
of
a
centralized,
decentralized
identity
management
solution,
and
so
it
would
work
like
a
standalone
web
page
or
web
service
where
you
as
a
user,
you
you
go
there
and
you
log
in
with
your
ethereum,
address,
metamask
login,
and
then
you
verify
your
different
accounts
once
and
one
you
once
you
have
verified
those
accounts
with
the
identity
service,
then
those
verifications
can
be
used
by
by
source
cred
and
they
can
be
used
by
praise.
A
So
so
that
that
was
the
the
background
and
what
they're
doing-
and
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
I'm
I'm
talking
to
people
at
source
cred
right
now
about
seeing
if
we
can
collaborate
on
this
somehow
because
we
have
some
additional
needs
that
source
credit
doesn't
have
we,
for
instance,
we
need
to
validate
twitter
and
telegram
accounts
which
source
cred
doesn't
need,
but
we
both
need
discord,
discourse
and
github.
A
Those
are
the
five
in
total
we're
looking
at
just
now,
so
maybe
we
can
do
a
collaboration
and
create
some
sort
of
solution
that
we
both
can
use,
which
would
be
really
cool
and
a
fun
project
of
a
sort
of
doubt
about
collaboration,
we'll
see
how
it
goes.
I
hope
we
can
manage
to
to
do
that,
but
post
more
updates.
When
I
know
more.
A
So
maybe
yeah,
let's
move
on
to
the
rewards
committee
talk
or
discussion
I'll
pass
it
to.
D
So
yeah
thanks
christopher,
for
offering
a
long
time
of
this
call
for
us
to
jump
in
this.
I
think
people
love
it
too,
that
we
don't
have
to
schedule
another
call.
So
here
we
have
the
to-do
list,
that's
stuff,
that
we
can.
We
need
to
cover-
and
I
think
a
lot
of
it
will
be
solved
in
this
call.
So
some
topics
that
I
want
to
bring
up
is
tasks
compensation.
D
So
that
means
that
some
of
those
funds
I
mean
all
those
funds
would
be
sent
to
the
reward
and
then
from
there
we
would
just
have
to
distribute
them
in
the
proposal,
so
there's
not
much
to
manage,
but
just
knowing
that
those
funds
will
be
available
already.
D
If
that
proposal
passes
and
then
whenever
those
funds
end
that
they
should
last
a
while,
I
think
we
were
talking
something
about
like
six
months,
then
someone
from
the
committee
should
submit
a
proposal
to
the
dow
and
send
the
wrap
decks
die
to
the
funding
curve
to
get
the
tc
tokens
and
then
transfer
the
tech
tokens
to
the
reward
data.
And
for
that
we
would
need
a
multi-sig
wallet
for
for
the
people
who
is
submitting
this
proposal
or
is
just
one
address.
D
I
think
that's
what
I
remind
from
you
saying,
christopher
and
and
then
we
need
to
create
proposals
in
the
reward
dao
with
the
data
from
the
dashboard
to
distribute
funds
to
contributors.
So
this
would
be
the
praise
and
source
credit
combined
that
are
going
to
be
these
proposals
in
in
the
reward
now
and
then
everybody
just
needs
to
vote
for
those
funds
to
be
distributed,
and
then
last
post
an
analysis
report
that
shouldn't
be
shouldn't
require
any
writing
or
not.
Much
writing.
D
We
should
receive
this
info
almost
ready
from
the
analysis
section,
but
just
making
sure
that
that's
available
for
the
community
and
that
people
know
where
to
look
for
that.
G
Yeah
just
going
back
to
requesting
funds.
What,
at
what
intervals?
Did
you
imagine
doing
these
funding
requests
for
each
quant
quarterly.
G
Yeah
just
thinking
out
loud,
it's
really
going
to
depend
on
the
conviction,
voting
settings
that
we
choose,
because
it
might
turn
out
that
three
months
worth
of
funds
will
be
impossible
or
really
hard
to
request.
So
we'll
have
to
keep
an
eye
on
that
to
see.
What's,
what's
decided
for
the
commons
upgrade.
E
G
No
we'll
have
we'll
have
80k
from
the
initial
buy-in,
so
there
won't
actually
be
any
funds
in
the
reward
system
until
we
do
the
commons
upgrade
so
in
a
way,
you're
right
and
we
actually
don't
have
a
system.
We
won't
have
the
system.
Yet
funding
requests
until
the
commons
upgrade.
E
C
E
C
D
I
think
there
is
a
misunderstanding
here
just
because
we
have
a
buffer
of
six
months.
If
the
initial
buy-in
proposal
passes
that
we
wouldn't
need
to
request
those
funds.
So
that's
a
later
problem
and
this
will
be
solved
by
then.
So
we
just
need
to
make
sure
that
this
initial
buy-in
proposal
passes
and
those
35
percent
of
funds
go
to
the
rewards
that.
D
A
H
C
I
mean
I
I
couldn't
agree
more
because
the
price
is
it's
funny,
but
the
number
can
only
go
up
and
I
know
it
seems
like
a
meme.
But
actually,
if
we
just
wait
like
a
few
weeks,
the
price
will
only
go
higher.
So
it's
good
not
to
distribute
the
funds
like
the
week
of
launch,
maybe
at
least
wait
two
weeks
to
distribute
the
funds,
but
it
doesn't
mean
we
can't
quantify
it
and
then
have
a
vote
on
debating
how
much
should
be
distributed
and
stuff
like
that.
Yeah.
G
D
A
A
E
I
think
thank
you
so
much
for
saying
that
christopher
both
saying
that
it
might
not
be
our
work,
but
it's
work
that
we
need
to.
E
Some
people
seem
to
forget
that,
like,
if
someone's
banned
from
the
server
that
also
takes
them
out
of
the
instance,
for
example,
if
we're
using
discord
and
just
just
like
not
like
acknowledging
that
up
front
and
understanding
the
reactions
of
of
identity
management
and
and
reward
systems.
Credit
at
least.
B
I'd
like
to
add
something
about
automating
our
ids.
I
don't
think
idx
is
something
that
we
ready
for
at
the
moment,
but
one
it
does
have
a
bot
that
can
be
used
to
link
identities
and
it
also
verifies
them.
It
added
writes
directly
to
source
script.
So
maybe
we
can
you
fork
that
part
and
play
around
with
it.
Maybe
we
can
make
it
work
for
ourselves.
A
But
still
still
bought
or
bought
or
no,
but
I
agree
that
we
should
try
to
automate
it
as
simply
as
possible
to
to
decrease
the
workload,
but
but
still
the
responsibility
for
onboarding
and
off
boarding
needs
to
be
on
someone
or
some
some
group
and
the
main
question
just
here
is
it:
is
it
the
rewards
committee's
responsibility
for
someone
else's.
B
Because
their
funding
proposal
does
involve
like
having
five
to
six
people
that
are
responsible
for
onboarding
people
like
make
a
point
of
contact,
so
I
think
it
would
make
sense
to
have
this
as
something
that
they
manage
cool.
D
E
Libby
you're
doing
a
great
job,
there's
we're
already
working
and
we
haven't
even
discussed
our
roles
yet.
But
I
agree
that,
like
it'd
be
great
to
talk
about
what
you
took
for
the
last
14
minutes
like
just
looking
talking
about
each
other
a
little
bit.
It
would
be
awesome
and
then
we'll.
We
can
continue
to
pick
up
what
might
be
missing
from
the
list
and
how
to
yeah
between
this
and
the
other
working
groups.
D
H
Before
going
on,
I
wanted
to
add
something.
The
second
point
we
could
also
consider-
maybe
if
it's
not
too
crazy-
to
add
the
aragon
agent
agent
for
making
the
proposals
on
behalf
the
dao.
So
that
could
be
cool,
so
we
don't
have
to
assign
it
to
a
multisig.
So
it
is
essentially
a
multisig,
but
it
would
be
handled
by
the
dow
per
se.
So
for
the
second
point
to
asking
the
proposals
on
the
funding
and
all
of
that,
we
could
use
the
aragon
agent
for
that.
D
Yeah
that
that
sounds
great,
so
one
last
thing
that
we
have
to
do
so.
I
would
love
to
use
this
last
minutes
just
to
go
person
by
person
and
understand
like
from
this
commitment.
What
is
that
you're
more
interested
to
work
on
and
like
that?
We
could
start
separating
some
tasks
and
and
coordinate
the
further
steps.
D
So
writer
already
wrote
it
down
in
the
in
the
chat-
and
I
think
that's
great
so
just
to
give
an
example:
they
want
to
work
on
the
treasury
source
credit
parameters.
Instance:
maintenance,
discuss
about
creating
healthy
culture,
using
reward
systems
collectively
analyzing
data.
Do
you
want
to
add
anything
here?
Writer.
E
I
just
feel
I
might
at
least
with
who's
in
the
room.
Right
now
be
the
yes,
I'm
the
direct
link
to
like
source
credit
and
what
we're
prioritizing
now
grant
writing
like
generalizing
the
one
I've
bought,
and
so
a
lot
of
my
work
will
also
include
just
like
keeping
like.
I
think
that
it's
possible
that
I
could
help
us
with
our
pace
and
project
management
based
on
what
we're
building
at
source
cred.
E
So
that's
not
on
the
list,
but
being
that
middle
person,
source,
great,
steward
or
delegate,
or
something
because
there's
several.
We
are
building
right
now,
very
much
so
for
making
instance,
maintainers
lives
easier
and
yeah.
It's
kind
of
going
to
be
up
to
us
in
the
reward
style
like
how
much
we
want
to
trailblaze
ourself
or
wait
for
things
to
be
a
little
bit
easier,
as
things
are
being
built.
D
H
Sure,
well,
essentially,
I
could
be
doing
what
I've
been
doing
for
all
of
these
months.
That
is
not
necessarily
maintainers
but
onboarding,
affording
the
identities
on
source
credit
and
making
the
distributions.
H
I'm
not
sure
if
that
goes
a
little
bit
too
alike,
with
the
source
red
instance
maintainers
that
that
rider
was
mentioning,
but
that
would
be
most
of
it
also,
I
could
say
handling,
maybe
some
efforts
on
the
on
the
dow,
not
sure
if
that's
also
needed,
like,
for
example,
if
we
are
going
to
use
the
agent
trying
to
make
those
proposals
and
handling
all
of
the
action
items
that
we
need
to
do
from
the
job,
not
sure
how
to
make
that
super
clear,
but
yeah
supported
that
management
could
be
a
good.
H
If
you
guys
have
any
other
idea,
I
think
that
that
could
be
a
good
start.
H
A
Sure
I
then
will
of
course,
will
be
the
the
praise
system.
Delegate
sort
of
can
keep
an
extra
eye
on
that
instance
and
also
manage
the
the
praise
parameters
there.
There
are
few,
but
there
are
parameters.
A
And
also
I'm
the
direct
link
to
the
rewards
system
upgrade
project
I'd
say
so,
so
I
I'll
keep
my
sort
of
my
product
manager,
product
manager
hat
on
sometimes
and
do
some
of
the
nudging
and
and
maybe
process
work,
and
I
want
to
help
the
rewards
committee
to
build
up
a
process
around
that
this.
That
is
super
clear
and
as
clear
as
possible
and
and
that
we
communicate
it
clearly
it
and
it
becomes
it's
easy
for
everyone
to
understand
what
is
happening.
So
maybe
I'll
do
can
do
some
diagramming
as
well.
F
Yeah,
well,
I
think
it's
it
can
help.
If
I
get
I
can
involved
in
this.
In
the
analysis
part,
I
think
that's
there's
going
to
be
some
some
synergies
with
the
stuff
with
the
work
we're
taking
on
now
and
with
the
rewards
part.
So
that
would
be
something
and
I'm
happy
to
help
with
with
comms
and
yeah
and
onboarding,
even
also,
if
there's,
if
this
needs
stuff
to
be
done,.
D
G
Yeah
sure
the
internet
cut
out
a
bit
there,
so
I
lost
you
guys,
but
I
would
like
to
review
the
quants
so
that
that
final
step,
we
outlined
of
sorry
there's
a
plantain
party
going
on
behind
me.
So
yeah
reviewing
quant,
you
know
looking
for
anomalies,
I
love
the
idea
as
well
of
like
looking
into
the
analytics
for
the
mvp
product,
and
there
was
another
thing:
oh
yeah.
If
we
decide
to
go
the
eragon
dow
route,
I
also
am
capable
of
doing
some
magic
with
that.
B
Mainly
I'd
like
to
do
platform
support,
which
is
anything
that
really
happening
with
discord
or
github
that
we
would
need
to
in
order
to
make
source
credit
work
or
any
anomalies
that
pop
up.
One
thing
that
I'd
like
to
do
is
maybe
work
on
a
backup
system
for
place
where
we
have
a
secondary
bot
tracking
phrase
so
that
if,
whenever
there's
a
law
I
lost,
we
have
a
way
to
recover
that.
B
That's
something
I'd
be
interested
in
and
integrations
if
there
are
any
that
are
needed
for
linking
things
together
and
I'd,
be
here
for
onboarding
people
too.
B
H
D
Yeah
we're
just
going
over
the
roles
that
everyone
wants
to
take
within
the
committee.
So
what
would
you
be
interested
to
collaborate
with.
H
I
can
definitely
support
the
count,
part
and
yeah.
I
feel
that
maybe
like
promotion
like
around
the
the
like
the
votes
and
and
internal
communications
is
like
a
good
initial
like
objective
and
and
yeah.
H
Also,
I
I
I
feel
that
just
being
able
to
to
guide
like
some
of
some
of
the
people
through
the
through
the
basics
kind
of
like
there's,
there's
not
really
like
a
role
for
it
in
in
one
hive,
but
I
feel
that
stewards
can
can
it
can
help
a
lot
with
with
that
role,
it
could
be
like
like
well
yeah,
like
like
reward
systems,
onboarding
and
and
yeah.
Most
of
all,
like
observe
what
else
I
can
contribute
with.
D
Awesome,
thank
you.
Yeah
help
with
comms
will
be
super
appreciated.
Maybe
if,
if
that's
cool
for
you,
you
could
be
responsible
for
this
post
analysis
report
that
is
kind
of
related
to
comms.
H
I
guess
it's
kind
of
like
something
that
maybe
we
could
think
with
manus
like
weekly
updates
and
like
in
a
in
a
similar
way.
As
I
do
with
common
swarm,
you
mean.
D
Cool
thank
you
and
I
would
like
to
help
with
metrics
and
data
analysis
and
support
the
cultural
call
with
the
with
the
quantifiers.
D
I
I'd
like
to
step
in
in
some
like
I
I
when
I
first
saw
it,
I
thought
it
was
not
that
fun,
but
there's
some
yeah.
C
There
are
some,
I
think
I.
I
Like
to
participate
like,
I
think
it's
it's
good
to
have,
you
know,
for
example,
in
reviewing
the
you
know,
reviewing
the
quants,
it's
good
to
have
more
eyes
and
for
like
I
I
like,
like
there
are
three
things
that
catch
my
attention.
Like
the
data
analysis,
I
I'm
I'd
like
to
be
on
board.
I
I
think
it's
also
going
to
help
me
with
the
audit,
since
we
are
going
to
do
a
lot
of
analysis
there,
so
I
like
to
be
with
the
crew
who's
talking
about
that
just
being
there,
and
I
really
also
like
to
see
them
the
yeah
review,
the
the
you
know
like
after
the
price.
I
One
review
like
I
feel
it's
important
like
have
many
ice
as
possible,
not
as
much
as
cultural
in
size,
but
you
know
like
when,
when
we
were
doing
the
the
praise-
and
sometimes
we
were
editing
the
price,
because
you
know
it's
subjective,
sometimes
some
people
who
was
contributing
a
lot
was
not
getting
enough
praise
or
vice
versa.
I
D
And
I
think
we're
leaning
on
not
necessarily
tweaking
the
numbers
there.
I
don't
know.
Maybe
we
need
to
discuss
more
about
that
with
everyone.
But
my
idea
is
that
we
wouldn't
tweak
so
much
the
numbers
there,
but
because
we
have
the
cultural
insights
and
the
analysis,
that's
something
that
can
be
fixed
in
the
future
rounds
like
something
that
doesn't
carry
a
problem
that
doesn't
carry
on
and
that
we
don't
need
to
like
touch
so
much
on
the
legitimacy
of
the
process
that
the
quantifiers
are
having.
A
In
the
the
current
process
that
we
have
planned
for
the
the
it's
not
on
the
rewards
committee's
responsibility
to
change
anything
basically
or
you're,
not
that
is
a
task
for
for
the
quantifiers,
a
a
group
group
exercise
there.
They
are
doing
after
the
they
do
the
in
individual
quantifications
and
then
they
meet
and
have
this
session
for
doing
cultural
analysis
and
and
maybe
tweaking
what
needs
tweaking.
A
So
if
the
rewards
committee
also
need
wants
the
possibility
to
actually
edit
the
distribution
and
then
that
would
have
to
be
added
somewhere.
I
Yeah,
I
also
agree
yeah.
Okay,
it
wasn't
clear
but
yeah
the
cultural
insights.
Then
I
think
it's
fun
and
could
I
get
some
explanation
on
the
like?
Only
trader
is
working
on
the
treasury.
What's
the
role
there.
I
I
I
like
to
know.
D
So
sorry,
we
just
we're
just
on
top
of
the
hour
and
thank
you
everyone
for
coming
and
if
you
anyone
needs
to
go,
feel
free
to
go
and
I'll
answer
you
what's
up,
so
the
the
treasury
will
be
mostly
just
deciding
how
much
funds
are
going
to
be
distributed
in
every
round.
D
So
it's
basically
like
for
source
credit
that
would
be
setting
up
the
grain
and,
like
the
the
amount,
that's
going
to
be
sent
to
the
rewards
that
were
captured
and
then
for
praise
kind
of
like
we
did
in
the
points
you
know
on
the
top.
We
would
put
like
how
much
impact
hours
we
were
willing
to
give
on
that
round,
but
now
that
will
be
with
actual
tokens
with
funds.
E
I
want
to
add
that
this
is
all
just
on
paper
for
now,
like
I
don't
actually
know
people
interact
with
these
systems
yet
just
because
we
had
a
meeting,
you
know
that's
our
first
meeting
and
I
think
that
that
is
we're
all
in
these
systems
also
and
I've
salaried
and
I
don't
know
who's
receiving
grants
and
there's
just
so
many
reward
systems
happening
simultaneously,
even
ones
that
we're
not
considering,
and
what
I'm
really
interested
in
is
like
noticing
the
tools
we're
using
and
how
much
they
can.
E
That's
paying
people
on
a
recent
policy,
and
I
just
don't
want
these
options
to
be
overlooked
because
of
poor
documentation
or
lack
of
understanding
of
the
product,
and
so
as
we
continue
to
make
these
things
available,
I
want
them
to
be
accessible
to
people,
and
so
I'm
just
like
trying
to
bring
out
that
kind
of
nuance.
I
know
that
tec
developed
praise,
and
so
they,
you
all
know
a
lot
about
praise
but,
like
I
think
our
product
might
not
have
the
same.
E
Like
nuanced
understanding-
and
I
want
to
bring
that-
and
I'm
it's
being
brought
to
me
every
day,
so
yeah.
A
And
I
guess
that
that
is
still
quite
an
open
topic
of
discussion.
The
the
reward
system
will
will
exist
on
top
of
other
streams
of
of
payment
like
salaried
work,
etc.
But
I
I
don't
believe
it's
decided
upon.
How
will
the
work
groups
and
how
will
different
people
involved
in
the
tc
going
forward
will
be?
How
will
they
be
salaried?
There
will
be,
I
guess,
grants
of
some
some
kind
there.
A
E
Salary
people
for
what
they're
receiving
from
emoji
reactions
or
whatever
depends
how
you're
using
it
because
discord
all
the
different
plugins
are
different
but
yeah
just
just
trying
to
bring
in
that
nuance.
A
And
that
new
nuance
would
be
one
of
the
sort
of
main
topics
that
the
rewards
committee
is
responsible
for
for
managing
or
over
time
to
to
massage
the
source
credit
instance
and
see
when
new
new
features
arrive,
suggest
to
the
community
that
maybe
now
we
shouldn't
do
maybe
now
we
should
do
our
work
group
fixed
budgets
within
source
credit.
Somehow,
because
now
the
system
supports
that
etc
and.
E
I
just
yeah-
and
I
just
requested
the
feature
yesterday
of
time-
scoped
distributions
that
we
could
say
like
okay,
this
yeah,
so
that
we
could
have
a
grant-
that's
just
distributed
through
source
cred
to
a
team
or
two
like
a
set
of
people.
Just
between
these
certain
dates
you
know
like
if
it
was
quarterly
or
if
it
was
once
or
over
a
year
or
whatever,
for
residents,
etcetera,.
C
Can
I
can
I
jive
after
off
of
what
you
were
saying
there
there
there's
like
a.
I
think,
it's
a
really
important
point
that
some
people
get
paid
and
from
other
systems
and
some
others
don't
and
eventually.
I
hope
the
reward
system
has
a
way
to
account
for
that
or
we
create
some
sort
of
social
system
to
account
for
that
in
some
way,
but
also
there
was
another
point
that
I
thought
or
that
came
up
where
you're
like.
Oh,
you
guys
are
deep
in
praise
and
you
can
source
could
learn
from
us.
C
But
honestly,
I
also
really
want
to
learn
from
you
guys
and
how
you
do
props,
and
I
did
a
thing.
One
thing
that
we
always
had
trouble
with
was
self-praise
and
it
doesn't
feel
good
to
praise
yourself,
but
the
idita
thing
seems
to
have
a
like
a
mitigation
there,
and
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
part
of
the
mvp
and
I
don't
want
us
to
ever
change
scope
at
this
stage,
but
I
really
wish
that
we
could
find
a
solution
like
I
did
a
thing
for
self
praise.
C
B
G
B
Because
I'm
wondering
like
we
won't
need
to
change
anything
in
the
back
end
like
we
don't
need
to
change
how
the
data
gets
faded.
A
We
still
need
to
somehow
separate
the
the
two
I
think
in
the
back
end,
because
they
did
represent
two
different
things.
A
B
A
So
libby,
what
do
you
say?
Are
we
done
with
the
rewards
committee
discussion
for
today?
I
I
need
to
leave
at
least.