►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
You
have
to
log
in
before
I
before
I
add
you.
A
The
pseudonyms
aren't
there
yet
because,
in
order
for
you
to
yeah
yeah
the
pseudonyms
first
that
that
feature
is
not
implemented
yet
the
setting
is
there
to
turn
it
on
and
off
it's
it's
a
simple
thing
to
add,
and
it's
not
at
this
stage
so
so
when,
when,
when
viewing
the
names
in
the
quantifier
pool,
the
pseudonyms
is
not
a
thing
because
there
we
would
like
to
see
the
real
persons
behind
the
who
is
in
the
quantifier
pool,
because
this
is
an
admin
page
that
you
are
seeing
on
my
screen
now.
A
But
currently
we
don't
see
any
any
of
your
usernames
either
because
you
haven't
activated
your
accounts
through
discord
and,
and
that's
that
is
one
step
that
we
haven't
finished
yet
because
that
for
doing
that,
we
need
to
have
the
bot
up
and
running,
but
that
is
not
vital
actually
to
be
able
to
quantify
praise.
The
only
thing
that
happens
when
you
activate
your
account
of
following
a
link
from
discord
is
that
your
discord
username
gets
connected
to
your
ethereum
address.
A
B
A
A
A
Yeah
yeah,
let
me
start
by
first
deleting
the
these
test
users,
so
we
because
the
the
system
assigns
quantifiers
automatically
when
I
press
the
assign
button.
So
if
I
remove
these,
I
will
sort
of
guarantee
that
I
removed
myself.
A
Yeah
quantifier
periods
like
you,
can
see.
There's
there
are
three
periods,
one
one
period
is
closed
and
the
other
two
are
open.
So
now
no
quantifiers
have
been
assigned
to
this
period.
A
A
So
I
press
the
assign
quantifiers
and
it
says
that
the
quantifier
pool
has
eight
members
and
and
based
on
the
amount
of
praise
and
the
settings
we
have
set.
We
we
need
the
six
quantifiers,
so
the
the
requirements
are
met,
which
means
I
can
assign,
and
now
we
get
some
notification
about
assigning
occurring
and
confirmation,
and
in
this
list
you
should
be
seeing
your
your
usernames
or
your
ethereum
addresses.
So
that
is
a
simple
fix.
A
I
will
make
and
now
there's
just
empty
empty
space
because
you
don't
have
any
usernames
only
ethereum
addresses,
but
as
far
as
I
can
tell-
or
you
now
should
have
been
assigned
a
praise
to
quantify.
So
if
you
reload
your
browser
and
press
shift
and
reload,
you
should
be
able
to
see.
A
Oh,
that's
right.
I
forgot
because
I
I
assign
a
new,
I
assign
new
roles
to
all
of
you.
You
used
to
be
only
users
and
now,
since
I
assigned
you
to
the
quantifier
pool,
you
have
become
quantifiers
as
you
need
to
log
out
of
the
system
and
login
again
and
there's
no
like
really
there's
not
there's
not
really
a
good
way
around
that
unless
we
on
each
request
sort
of
check.
A
If,
if
the
roles
have
been
changed,
which
seems
a
bit,
I
usually,
I
think
we
will
add
people
to
the
quantifier
pool
and,
and
they
will.
D
D
Oh,
no,
I
can't
because
it
won't.
Let
me
share
my
firefox
for
some
reason.
Sorry,
it's
just
that
when
I
get
to
the
page
and
there
it's
it
says,
like
current
quantification
ends
at
february
1st,
you
can
perform
quantifications
for
the
following
periods
and
then
there's
period
2,
which
is
a
link.
D
It
shows
me
my
the
users
I
can
quantify
and
takes
me
to
the
to
the
page
where
I
can
quantify.
D
B
A
Yeah
that
that
is
so
far
is
is
intended,
and
but
if
that
is
confusing,
we
we
can
of
course
change
that
so
so
clicking
on
on
the
clicking
on
the
quantification
periods.
It
just
lists
all
all
periods
and
and
the
the
the
pink
button
is
not
intended
as
a
a
button,
but
as
a
label.
Okay,
but
if
it
is
perceived
as
a
button,
then
we
need
to
make
it
more.
I.
A
Yeah
yeah
I
I
can
see
that
it
actually
looks
quite
much
like
a
button.
E
A
A
So
but
the
thing
is
before
for
you
it's
too
late
now
we
have
already
assigned
quantifiers
for
this
period
and
but
of
course
we
can,
we
could
add
we
could
assign
quantifiers
for
a
new
period
as
well.
B
Yeah
I
was
asking
which
scale
does
this
use
big
bananaki
right?
Sorry,
which,
which
scale?
Is
this
using
yeah
the
scale
of
the
brace.
B
A
A
And
that
is
also
on
purpose.
It's
like
one
three,
five,
eight,
what
what
is
the
scale.
C
A
Well,
that
is
easily
changeable.
I
I
was
uncertain,
but
what
we
decided
upon,
which
scale
that
question
I
think
levy.
You
asked
that,
and
I
I
realized
I
I
haven't.
I
have
sort
of
conflicting
notes
on
what
we
decided.
I
know
we
discussed
discussed
a
smaller
number
of
praise,
score
choices.
B
E
A
A
E
Yeah,
it
was
intended
right
to
have
a
slow
increase
that,
because
most
of
the
contributions
will
probably
be
in
the
lower
range
and
then
having
something
that
clearly
changes
from
that
range
to
something
more
meaningful
and
then
having
something
that,
if
it's
like
extraordinary,
it
can
go
all
the
way
up.
But
then
slowly
getting
there.
A
So
but
but
did
do
we
have
any
success
with
the
doing
the
the
quantifications
the
like
I
mentioned.
The
intention
is
not
that
you
should
go
into
the
quantification
periods
when
you
want
to
to
quantify.
Maybe
we
can
add
the
edit
somewhere
here
as
well
with
the
button
below
the
the
period
name
or
something
like
my.
A
My
thought
was
that
when,
if
you
see
this
information
on
the
on
the
first
page
and
on
the
on
the
the
period
listing
page,
it
doesn't
need
to
be
also
on
the
on
this
period,
detail
page
and
then
and
on
the
the
period
detail
page
you
all,
the
information
will
be
shown.
The
the
praise
scores
will
be
visible
here
when
I
close
the
the
period.
D
I
actually
have
a
small
issue:
I'm
trying
to
you
know,
fill
out
the
numbers
and
when
I
want
to
mark
appraises
duplicate
it,
the
the
the
id
isn't
showing
anywhere.
So
I
don't
know
how
to
point
to
the
other
place.
A
So
I
I
don't
know
if
there
is
a
simpler
way
of
selecting
it.
It's
a
similar,
similar
way
of
choosing,
as
in
when
referencing
github
issues
that
you
have
to
look
up
the
the
issue
number,
because
the
the
list
can
be
the
the
list
can
be
long.
So
how
do
you?
How
do
you
find
the
the
the
right
place
in
this
case?
How
do
you
find
the
duplicate?
D
D
A
Yeah-
and
I
guess
that
this
back
end
is
quite
slow,
because
I'm
running
the
the
database
and
the
the
web
server
and
the
front
end
on
the
same
really
small
digital
ocean
droplet.
But
I
guess
there
could
be
like
a
spinner
load
or
something
indicating
that
you're
waiting
for
for
suggestions.
B
I'm
having
some
problems
like
actually
like
when
I
go
to
my
braces,
ask
me
for
login,
I
sign
the
transaction,
but
then
it
goes.
Maybe
I
don't
know
if
it's
worth
if
I
share
screen
and
you
give
it
a
look
yep,
please
do
yeah.
A
Yeah
and
the
the
usernames
are
missing
there
because
you
haven't,
you
got
any
usernames,
but
it
should
show
something
instead,
like
you're,
a
short
version
of
your
ethereum
address
or
something
okay.
So,
if,
if,
if
nothing
shows
on
the
this,
the
quantification
periods
that
the
page
you
were
just
visiting
the
one
before
this,
that
means
you
are,
you
are
not.
A
Actually
you
have
been
assigned
as
a
quantifier
for
for
this
period
and
and
that
might
that
might
be
the
case
because
we
had
more
quantifiers
in
the
pool
than
than
we
needed
and
not
everyone
gets
assigned.
B
A
B
A
Okay,
but
I'll
take
some
some
notes:
labels
in
at
least.
B
C
A
First
quantifying
period
yeah,
so
you
have
been
assigned
the
quantifier,
and
these
are
the
the.
What
you
see
on
this
screen
is
the
the
the
all
the
receivers
you
have
been
assigned
to
quantify.
A
A
A
So
what
what
remains
to
be
done,
except
for
fixing
these
small,
the
small
glitches
that
we
identify
now
like
you,
usernames,
etc,
but
those
are
really
small
things.
What
is
left
before
we
can
actually
do
perform.
The
trial
quantification
is
that
we
need
to
import
real
information
into
the
system,
and
I
see
it
because,
as
you
can
see,
the
quantification
works,
we
can
assign
quantifiers
and
we
just
also
implemented
the
export
function.
D
B
D
D
A
A
Hashtagging
and
paste
duplicate
doesn't
work,
so
I'm
trying
to
write
write
some
stuff
down
now,
so
we
because
all
this
was
really
good
feedback.
Can
you
help
me
remember
what
we
said?
What
was
the
glitches
labels
in
the
period
was
unclear?
A
C
There's
a
lot
of
ux
improvements
that
need
to
be
made
because
yeah
things
are
like
not
clear
how
to
get
to
where
we
need
to
go.
You
know,
like
maybe
just
more
obvious
buttons
to
get
to
places
and,
like
you
know,
when
we
finish
our
quantification
like
is
there
a
way
to
like
submit
it
or
at
least
to
like?
Let
the
quantifier
know
that
they're
done
everything.
C
A
We
could
absolutely
in
in
in
the
lists
now,
I'm
I'm
not
a
quantifier
anymore.
Let's
see.
A
So,
do
you
see
my
screen
now
yeah.
A
Of
course,
when
I
I
have
when
the
quantification
is
finished,
when
I've
done
all
items,
so
when
that
number
come
becomes
zero,
we
could
of
course
add
like
an
extra
like
add
a
check
mark
to
the
right
or
something
you
need
to
highlight,
like
you're
done
and
then
the
same
thing
here
in
in
this
summary
list.
That
shows
all
all
your.
A
A
A
C
Right
here,
so
you
click
here,
usually
click
here,
they're
here
they're
like
oh
quantify
away
and
then
maybe
just
having
this
link
so
this
period
to
show
up
somewhere
around
here.
B
A
C
A
Someone
mentioned
it,
but
I
don't
know
like
quantify.
C
And
well,
my
praise
throws
an
error.
I
don't
know
if
that's
normal
yeah.
A
A
That's
this
we
I,
I
added
that
as
a
like
a
killer
reset
function
for
now
when
we
develop,
so
when
something
goes
wrong,
it
just
clears
the
browser,
cache
and
forces
you
to
log
in
again
and
and
that
will
be
handled
in
a
better
way
further.
B
I
just
saw
the
the
admin
dashboard
and
there's
buttons
over
there
in
the
period
details.
Maybe
the
same
buttons
can
be
present
but
with
different
link,
I'll
link,
actual
link
to
the
poll,
maybe.
A
Absolutely
so
let
me
let
us
if
we
don't
have
any
more
like
clear
feedback
on
this
that
I
should
take
with
me.
A
I
will
switch
over
to
the
admin
view
again
and-
and
I
will
close
the
period
and
show
you
how
that
looks
and
also
export
the
the
praise,
so
here
viewing
the
as
an
admin.
I
I
can
view
the
information
here
and,
and
have
you
all
only
you
have
only
chosen
chosen,
the
the
first,
the
first
person
in
the
list
to
make
quantifications
or
is
my
interface
not
showing
the
full
picture.
A
No,
it
looks
better,
it
wasn't
updated,
so
you
can
see
now
the
interface
is
updated
with
the
total
price
score
and
if
I
view
a
person
here,
I
can
see
the
the
score
for
for
each
praise,
and
hopefully
we
can
see
that,
for
instance,
this
phrase
has
been
quantified
by
three
people,
giving
it
three
different
scores
and
and
that
so
so
there
you
see
the
calculated
average
price
score.
A
So
this
looks
good.
Actually
this
is
the
the
first
the
time
we
we
try
quantifying
with
more
than
one
account
at
the
time.
So
I
hope
that
the
average
calculation
would
work
and
it
did.
A
So
but
let's,
let's
close
this
pair
down
because
now
we
are
done
so
I
close
it
and
closing.
It
means
that
no
more
quantifications
can
be
performed
closed.
A
But
that's
it.
The
period
is
closed
and
now
we
should
export
the
data
to
to
move
into
the
next
step.
And
now
you
don't
see.
B
A
C
D
Yeah,
I
actually
have
news
on
that,
because
I
was
talking
with
paulo
yesterday
from
the
common
swarm
and
he
was
he
said
he
was.
He
would
like.
He
was
going
to
do
it
anyway,
but
he's
writing
a
script
which
would
allow
us
to
just
take
the
list
of
of
the
of
the
of
the
of
the
distribution
and
actually
make
an
automatic
vote
in
the
gardens
which
already
shows
how
much
tokens
go
to
each
person
and
execute
it
once
the
vote
passes.
E
Yeah
and
that's
what
we
wanted
to
avoid
to
have
the
whole
community
doing
something
like
that
and
that
proposal
being
like
on
cue
of
the
other
proposals.
So
that's
why
we
created
another
dial
for
it,
but
maybe
what
we
could
use.
We
have
a
guidance
template
for
this
new
down.
C
I
don't
I
mean,
I
know
what
what
pablo
is
trying
to
do
with
the
the
evm
script
and
I
think
we
can
do
it,
but
yeah
migrating
into
a
gardens
is
a
whole
nother
thing.
You
know
we
have
this
thing
set
up
and
it
was
clearly
defined
from
the
get-go
that
we
were
going
to
use
an
aragon,
dow
and
all
this
stuff.
So
you
know
I
don't.
D
C
B
Yeah,
I
think
it's
cool
actually,
if
we
could
put
it
like
together,
like
an
idealized
conviction
voting,
so
you
know,
like
everyone,
who's
interested
both
on
that
I
mean
maybe
like
right
after,
like
the
first
world
war,
funds
go
out
like
if
we
could
do
it
in
convection
boating.
I
think
it's
I
mean
I
think.
E
A
C
I
mean
using
evm
crispr
will
be
super
easy.
I
can
tell
you
that,
and
it
will
like
not
create
too
much
overhead
of
trying
to
use
another
app
with
things,
and
you
know
the
common
swarm
like
pablo
and
sam
and
all
these
people
are
building
it.
So
we
have
a
lot
more
leverage
for
you
know
making
this
stuff
happen
and
getting
resorts.
C
D
I
think
it's
actually
probably
the
easiest
way
if
we
set
it
up,
it's
not
difficult
to
set
up,
and
it's
probably
going
to
be
easier
than
the
alternatives.
A
A
Set
it
up,
okay,
cool.
Let's
see,
we
have
15
more
minutes.
What
should
we
talk
about?
Could
we
plan
set
some
dates
mitch?
Do
you
feel
feel
that
we
could
schedule?
Something
now
is
it?
Is
it
done
enough.
C
A
Yeah
there
will
be.
I
know
I
mean
it's
like
I
said
it's
a
chicken
and
egg
situation
with
it
will
we
need
to
say
that
it
would
be
slightly
weird
to
wait
until
the
the
system
is
100
done
until
we
plan
something
and
then
realize
when
when
we
say
that
we
are
done,
then
we
say:
okay,
then,
in
two
weeks
we
can
do
the
product
one
and
we
could
have
used
those
two
weeks
of
doing
something
else.
A
I
mean
the
the
big
thing
that
needs
to
be
be.
That
remains,
is
the
importing
of
the
the
real
dating
into
the
system.
The
small
bugs
you
see
in
the
system
right
now
can
can
be
fixed
until
whatever
date
we
we
set,
it
can
be
done
by
by
friday
or
tomorrow.
It's
nothing.
C
Big,
the
other
thing
is
that
we
also
don't
have
the
the
final
parameters
ready
that
we
are
supposed
to
set
by
the
reward
board.
A
Yeah,
so
let's
set
a
date
for
for
setting
the
parameters.
First,
then,
because
we
to
move
into
status
updates.
The
plan
is
for
for
us
to
meet
tomorrow
about
the
source
cred
instance
and
setting
up
the
the
pollen
bot
so
that
the
the
source,
cred
instance
is,
is
fully
configured.
A
A
Yeah
but
but
the
the
question
is:
when
we
do
the
trial
quant,
do
we
only
do
the
trial
quantification
of
praise
or
do
we
do
a
trial
rewards
period
with
everything
I
have
also
a
plan
for
it
that
we
also
will
try
to
export
the
the
source
credit
data
for
november,
and
then
we
we
do
the
whole
thing
as
far
as
we
can
so
we
we
we
do
the
price
quantification.
We
export
the
source
credit
data
for
november.
E
So
so,
let's
schedule
right
now:
the
source
grand
the
source
grad
meeting
to
set
up
the
parents.
A
E
E
And
then,
while
this
is
being
integrated,
this
feedback
there's
a
few
days
for
finishing
source
cred,
and
then
we
have
this
meeting
to
update
the
params
and
then,
within
that
same
week
we
can
run
everything
all
together,
but
I
don't
think
all
of
this
forest
steps
need
to
happen
in
the
same
time
they
can
be
happening
and
then
the
final
run
will
just
be
when
everything
is
ready.
Right,
yep.
A
We
can
take
everything
a
step
at
a
time.
There's
no
stress,
and
it's
probably
better
and
wiser
to
do
like
you
described,
but
then
then
we
can
like
propose
a
date
for
for
doing
the
trial
quant,
and
I
I
think
I
I
think
we
are
ready
to
propose
that
we
we
could
do
the
the
trial
quant
next
week.
A
On
this
time
we
still
plan
to
be
be
finished,
with
the
the
prey
system,
like
fixing
all
these
small
ui
glitches
that
you
saw
today
by
friday
and
and
with
when
you
now
have
having
access
to
it.
We
can.
We
can
fix
the
small
remaining
issues
and
also
load
the
the
system
up
with
real,
with
real
praise.
A
And
and
then
we
have
a
few
days
next
week
to
fix
any
like
remaining
small
things
before
we
do
the
quant.
How
does
that
sound.
C
Yeah
sure
and
then
what's
my
other
question,
how
are
you
gathering
feedback.
A
C
A
Will
be
a
lot
yeah,
let's
come
up
with
a.
A
A
A
A
C
I
I
think
a
fair
amount
of
them
will
be
familiar
with
github,
because
that's
already
how
we
do
a
lot
of
the
stuff
in
tec
is
issue
tracking,
and
if
that
goes
directly
to
your
repository,
then
it's
much
easier
for
you
to
track.
A
B
B
If
we
have
a
scope
to
do
so,
maybe
we
can
add
a
feedback
button
and
do
one
of
those
text
boxes
that
just
goes
to
that
automatically
makes
like
a
like
an
issue
on
github.
It
would
be
some
work,
but
it
isn't
that
much
work
so.
A
E
What
is
that
needs
to
be
finished
in
source
current
christopher?
Is
it
just
the
meeting
tracker
bot.
A
No,
no
to
start
with
the
the
source
credit
instance
that
needs
to
be
out
to.
We
need
to
configure
the
pollenbot
so
that
that
users
can
self-administer
their
their
user
identity
so
that
they
can.
They
can
link
their
theme,
addresses
and
github
accounts,
etc.
A
So
that
is
one
thing
and
the
the
other
part
of
the
fallen
bot
is
also
auto
filling
the
database
with
new
information
at
regular
intervals
like
once
a
week,
all
the
information
is
getting
pulled
from
from
github
and
and
this
course
and
put
into
source
cred,
and
that
is
not
happening
automatically
right
now,
if
I'm,
if
I'm
right
yeah,
so
that
there's
like
some
small
configuration
details
that
needs
to
be
be
set
for
that
to
happen,
but
then
also
that
there
is
the
meeting
track
about
and
now
maybe
we
don't
have
time
to
to
talk
about
that.
A
B
Yeah
we
should.
I
just
had
one
quick
question:
if
people
can
answer,
would
we
be
comfortable
with
it
not
being
a
github
action
with
the
plugin
not
being
a
github
action.
B
Because
most
of
the
current
plugins
are
like
the
discord.
Plugin
also
runs
in
a
github
action,
as
I
was
wondering,
if
there's
some
preference
for
that,
or
is
it
all
ready
to
run
it
inside
a
dislotion
droplet.
B
There's
like
some
some
there
might
be
some
argument
about
transparency
over
here
that
you
can't
see
if
it's
happening
but
yeah.
That's
me.
The
my
main
concern
is
that
the
only
way
to
check
that
that
it
wrote
things
properly
is
to
either
check
the
source
grid
instance
or
log
into
your
docker
container
and
checking
checking
if
it
did
what
it
was
supposed
to
do.
B
Yeah
but
but
like
the
credit
output,
yeah
like
if
you
go
to
github-
and
you
know,
all
the
action
runs
are
locked
by
github,
so
you
can
have
an
output
that
say
that
displays
the
grid
rank
output.
So
anyone
can
go
over
there
and
view
the
data
and
match
it
with
source
grid.
So
that's
just
that
they
can
be
sure
that
there
hasn't
been
no
any
tampering
in
this
case.
That's
not
that
transparent.
If
it's
like
running
inside
a
container,
that's
on
a
server
that
everyone
does
not
have
access
to.
A
Is
there
a
huge
need
to
be
able
to
have
transparency
in
all
all
lengths
of
the
chain
from
from
tracking
meeting
attendance
to
the
data
ending
up
in
the
source
cred
database,
because
I
guess
you
can
also
in
look
at
the
the
final
data
stored
in
stored
in
the
source,
cred
database
or
the
their
ledger,
and
compared
to
your
your
member,
because
you
always
have
to
have
have
to
have
something
to
to
compare
against.
A
B
I
like,
I
think,
that's
a
collective
decision,
but
I
think
like
like
we
try
our
best
and
if
you
know
like
and
actually
like,
if
it's
on
christopher's
computer,
like
at
least
we
can
say
okay,
if
someone
wants
to
check
check
up
with
christopher
and
christopher,
like
give
the
data
without
manipulating
anything.
I
think
that
should
be
fine,
but
that's
just
my
opinion.
A
And
and
like
we
discussed
earlier
today
that
the
the
the
the
the
place
in
between
discord
and
source
cred
would
be
this
database,
where
the
the
bot
that
the
discord
meeting
tracker
board
stores
the
the
information
and
that
that
database,
we
wouldn't
delete
any
data
from
that
database.
Unless
we
we,
we
run
out
of
storage
space
and
since
the
meeting
tracker
information,
it's
quite
a
small
amount
of
data.
A
We
could
assume
that
that
we
could
at
least
like
track
a
year's
worth
of
meeting
information
meeting
attendance
information
without
a
problem
even
on
like
a
small,
a
digital
ocean
setup.
So
if,
if
something
would
occur,
if
someone
would
question
something
we
could
always,
you
know
just
open
up.
Do
a
report
from
the
database
like
showing
like
this.
This
is
exactly
what
we
have
tracked.
A
But
like
I
said
that
information
isn't
worth
much
unless
you
have
something
to
compare
against
and
you
don't,
there
is
no
way
of
generating
a
list
to
compare
against
unless
you
have
manually
taken,
notes
of
who
were
attending
each
meeting,
as
so
you
would
only
you
were,
would
only
be
able
to
do
like
a
pinpoint
and
and
do
what
means,
which
called
stick
proofs
controller,
where
you
check
a
single
check,
one
meeting,
because
you
you
took
notes
of
that
meeting
and
see
if
that
that
is
correct
income,
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
compare
the
whole
series
of
meetings.
B
If
it
runs
in
like
buy,
buy
this
computer
christopher,
I
don't
know
someone
is
working
on
it
like
three
different
sources.
It's
it's
even
better.
Like
you
know,
it's
not
one
person
that
have
like
control,
like
you
know,
like
blockchain
like
if
it's
running
all
the
data
in
different
places.
It's
it's
better.
A
Yeah,
it
will
most
likely
be
a
centralized
location
in
like
a
digital
ocean
or
heroku,
or
something
not
heroku,
but
like
a
server,
but
we
are
actually.
We
are
out
of
time
for
today.